As meddling minx Meghan Markle gets mocked about her jaunt into jam and loopy lettuce-loathing loon Liz Truss gets mocked about bumbling like a buffoon about her book, Samantha Markle speaks exclusively to ‘The Steeple Times’ about her soppy, self-centred sister
In comments to The Steeple Times last week, Samantha Markle shared a most sensible set of sentiments about her half-sister, the Duchess of Sussex marrying into the royal family.
In remarks sent via WhatsApp messenger, this wise and witty author and screenwriter shared her thoughts about the ongoing sagas caused by the outrageous behaviour of the drip Prince Harry and his mendacious menace wife, the wicked wench formerly known as Meghan Markle. Samantha Markle spoke for many and observed:
“I knew this was all just by design from the beginning… I hate to say it, but had everyone listened to me from the beginning, we would not be where we are today in the world with this madness.”
“If you really think about it, if it could all be unraveled and had people listened to me and had Harry listened to Prince William about not being hasty, things would be different now.”
Now, just days later and yet again proving herself as a self-centred, self-serving, self-publicist, the Duchess of Sussex has again made it all about herself and bizarrely brought out her own ‘brand’ – if this supposedly homemade muck could even be termed such – of jam.
Issued as a “limited edition” of just 50 jars, the sister-in-law of Prince William’s “American Riviera Orchard” strawberry offering was described as a “soft launch” and “so sweet” by the usually acerbic Perez Hilton. The pots were supposedly gifted to “influencers” – a group of bizarre beings deservedly mocked by Miriam Margolyes yesterday when she asked: “What the f**k is that?” – including someone with just 7,459 Instagram followers named Tracy Robbins and someone else slightly more popular with 560,000 Instagram followers from Argentina named Delfina Blaquier. We doubt any of you will have heard of one, let alone both of these Botoxed brainboxes.
Of the gooey gloop, Robbins gushed: “I absolutely love this jam so not sure I’m sharing with anyone, thank you M!” before cringeworthily crafting: “Breakfast, lunch and dinner just got a little sweeter.” Blaquier, the wife of one of the dopey dunce Prince Harry’s few remaining “pals,” polo player Nacho Figeraus, sordidly “slathered the sweet stuff on a piece of toast alongside strawberries and a cheese plate” and said: “Strawberry jam makes me happy and I am your jam.”
Meanwhile elsewhere, she-who-lasted-less time than an iceberg lettuce in serving just 49 days in office, the shortest-lived Prime Minister in modern history, The Rt. Hon. Liz Truss MP, has been doing the media circuit also. Clutching a copy of a banal book she’s allegedly written yet could not hold the correct way around or the correct way up, Truss has come out in support of Donald Trump and in favour of abolishing the United Nations.
Which of these two tepid twerps will reach their best before dates first? A confirmed betting man would be at a loss even and would avoid any kind of wager on ‘Bizzy Lizzy’ and ‘Mucky MeGain.’
Sisters together in happier times; the jam flogger (pictured right) is now getting flagged up for her latest attempt to profit from her marriage into the royal family. One member of the public quite rightly asked on social media: “Is it right for the daughter-in-law of the King to be selling her soul to sell fifty pots of bloody effing jam?”American Riviera Orchard is the ‘brand’ the Duchess of Sussex is attempting to launch. That she cannot even get the labels to stick on to just 50 bottles of jam properly is proof enough that this is a ‘brand’ that won’t exactly be considered a threat to Tiptree, Hartley’s or Bonne Maman.The most disastrous PM the Conservative Party has ever selected, Liz Truss, lasted 49 days in office; she got very upset about the comparison to a lettuce lasting longer than her and she must be absolutely irate that there is even a Wikipedia page celebrating “the lettuce ‘victorious’ over Truss.” Of the mockery, Truss herself raged: “I don’t think it’s funny, I just think it’s puerile.” In response, the ‘Daily Star’ called her “fun sponge Liz.”The mere suggestion that Meghan Markle “likely made the 50 jars of jam she sent to friends ‘with her own hands using ingredients from Montecito’ as part of the very soft focus launch of American Riviera Orchard in an attempt to highlight the brand ‘rather than herself,’ claims expert” were met with derision; Liz Truss’s antics regarding the lettuce had been met with similar mockery in the autumn of 2022 with mockups such as this (pictured right).Neither women look exactly ‘at home’ in the kitchen; which is a more likely Julia Child and which is a more likely Nigella Lawson?The late distinguished and dignified Queen Elizabeth and the distinguished and dignified current King Charles have never looked comfortable being pictured with either the repugnant and rotten Liz Truss or the repugnant and rotten Duchess of Sussex. One has to wonder why; the two mentioned formerly clearly were of sound judgement.When the wicked wastrel and alleged “yacht girl” formerly known as Meghan Markle handed out bananas with patronising notes written on them, she was deservedly derided. What on earth else did this nasty nutcase expect would have occurred?‘MeGain’ used to blog about her supposed favourite wine, Tiganello. Now, with the launch of her new American Riviera Orchard ‘brand,’ one has to wonder if she’ll also be launching her own tipple also. The public hope not given it’d likely be as acid and acerbic as her own rotten persona.
What’s the truth about the stories that abound about the Duchess of Sussex?
Of her claiming having got married the day before she actually did, Mr Markle stated: “Lying about the archbishop? How can you say: ‘We’ve been married three days before we got married’? Her lies are so obvious, I don’t know why she says them.”
Her very own half-sister, Samantha Markle, who is currently continuing a defamation case against her, has called her out as a liar on multiple occasions also. It has been proven that the duchess’s claim that she hasn’t seen her sibling in over 20 years was untrue given a photo of the pair together 14 years ago proves quite to the contrary.
Her very own half-brother, Thomas Jr., said of her: “I told Prince Harry, I think she’s going to ruin your life. She’s very shallow… She’s a phony, a bully, a jaded, shallow, conceited woman.”
The wife of Prince Harry has been called out on multiple occasions for spinning stories against other members of the royal family, most especially the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge.
Staff who’ve worked for her have complained that she is a bully and investigations into this remain ongoing.
The Duchess of Sussex is a known manipulator of the press and paparazzis and it has been claimed that she’ll “twist the truth” to get any headline she wants.
Questions remain as to how many times she’s actually been married in total. Some say twice, some say thrice.
What’s the truth about Meghan’s mother Doria Ragland? Is this clearly equally manipulative woman an honest and decent citizen or is she a jailbird who has spent time in the clink?
Did the ‘Montecito Meddler’ meet Prince Andrew or Prince Harry first? Rumours abound that she could have spent time and holidayed with the former as long ago as 2001 and that her claim to have no prior knowledge of the royal family until 2016 is just utter baloney.
Further disaster strikes for telly box twerp Phillip Schofield as he strikes it unlucky and finds his TV tell-all compared to the car crash interviews of Michael Barrymore, Prince Andrew, Amber Heard and the Duchess of Sussex
Creepy crybaby cretin Phillip Schofield doesn’t have the option of excusing what he got upto with a youngster he met first (he claims) when the whippersnapper was just 15-years-old by claiming he was at a Pizza Express; equally, he probably doesn’t have the option as to using the excuse for what he got upto with Gordon T. Gopher also.
Very much like Prince Andrew – whom tried to claim he didn’t meet the then 17-year-old Virginia Roberts because he’d been in Woking’s most famous eatery, yet paid her £12 million nonetheless – however, the anything-but-sorry Schofield’s interview with the BBC’s Amol Rajan now finds itself compared to the non-sweaty royal’s Newsnight one in terms of it being a juggernaut wreck that would have been best avoided.
Very much deservedly mocked on social media as being in the league of disastrous interviews given previously by the likes of not only the late Queen Elizabeth II’s one with Emily Maitlis – which concluded with the presenter asking: “Is there anything left that has been unsaid that you would like to address now?” to which the rotten royal arrogantly answered: “No, I don’t think so. You have probably dragged out most of what is required” – here was a gluttony of gibberish that has now been likened to such given by the blubbing bore Amber Heard, the wicked wastrel formerly known as Meghan Markle and the bombastic bully Michael Barrymore.
Homan’s point is indeed valid, but equally it might be time to realise that such people as Prince Andrew, Michael Barrymore, Amber Heard, Phillip Schofield and the Duchess of Sussex deserve only one thing. That one thing? Cancellation.
Editor’s Note – Unlike as is the case in many publications, this article was NOT sponsored or supported by a third-party. Follow Matthew Steeples on Twitter at @M_Steeples.
This morning on Twitter, Matthew Steeples asked: “Which of these car-crash interviews will telly box twerp crybaby Phillip Schofield’s ‘rant-a-thon’ to Amol Rajan be remembered as being most like?” Options given included Michael Barrymore with Piers Morgan, the Duchess of Sussex with Oprah Winfrey, Prince Andrew with Emily Maitlis and any interview given by Amber Heard. By 11:30am on Saturday 3rd June 2023, the majority of respondents favoured the option of the Duke of York’s ‘Newsnight’ nightmare.
Two others incapable of giving interviews without making total berks of themselves… ‘Turd leaver’ Amber Heard and daughter of alleged convicted ‘drug dealer’ Doria Ragland, the Duchess of Sussex.The disgraced entertainer Michael Barrymore pictured ‘worshiping’ Sir Jimmy Savile in the ‘Celebrity Big Brother’ house in January 2006. Of the late paedophile, at the time, the self-centred ex-television host – whose interview with Piers Morgan also was considered beyond repugnant – disgustingly declared: “When he came in I was blown away because it’s him and he never lets you down. I didn’t think seeing Jim and hearing Jim talking and being so personal and kind to me. I started to well up in there and thought here we go.”Michael Barrymore disgustingly pretending to be Hitler (left) and the innocent victim of rape and murder at his home, father of two Stuart Lubbock (right).
Twitter compares the famous faces who’ve given the worst interviews known to man…
Justice for Stuart Lubbock – The people who need to man-up and tell the truth about what happened at Michael Barrymore’s home on 31st March 2001…
Michael Parker (AKA Michael Barrymore) – Allegedly loudly said: “I need a f**k” in a taxi as he left the Millennium Nightclub to return to his home, the scene of the death of Stuart Lubbock. Barrymore later lied to a coroner’s court about facilitating drug taking at his house on the night in question also.
Barrymore claimed to have been first to have discovered the body of Stuart Lubbock at 5.45am, called his manager Mike Brown before the ambulance arrived and then left the premises. He admits that was “wrong” and also bizarrely told Piers Morgan that in spite of “knowing others were hiding secrets about what happened to Mr. Lubbock” that “I am not going to say their names. I just hope they are brave enough to come forward one day.”
Mike Brown – Agent of Michael Barrymore. Called to the property before emergency services arrived.
Kelly Campbell – Had met Michael Barrymore for the first time on the night of the incident. Claimed not to have been aware of what happened.
James Futters (sometimes spelt ‘Futers’) – A paper boy turned chef. Described as “a local from the village” and a “friend and neighbour of Barrymore.” Claimed to have been the first to discover the body with Simon Shaw and stated: “[It was not] Michael Barrymore and not Jonathan Kenney [who found him].” Later, of him the Evening Standard reported: “Barrymore offered James Futters a white powder on his finger saying: ‘Do you want to try this?’ Mr Futters told the inquest that he leaned forward and licked the powder.”
Claire Jones – Then aged 17. Had met Michael Barrymore for the first time on the night of the incident. Claimed not to have been aware of what happened but told the police that she “saw Barrymore rummaging through drawers and changing his clothes before police arrived. When he left the house, he had a ‘bundle of material’ under his arm,” according to the Evening Standard. “She added: ‘Jonathan (Kenney) was rushing through the bungalow before the ambulance and police arrived. I got the impression he was hiding something.’”
Jonathan Kenney – Estate agent, drag queen and Michael Barrymore’s then lover; later arrested on suspicion of murder but never charged; known for having a “record of violence.” Claimed to have been the first to have discovered the body and is now aged 50.
Justin Merritt – A dustman from Essex. Later arrested on suspicion of murder but never charged. Later paid £30,000 by the News of the World for an interview in which he stated Barrymore had “rubbed cocaine on Stuart Lubbock’s lips shortly before he died.”
Kylie Merritt – Sister of Justin Merritt. She also alleged Barrymore “rubbed cocaine on Stuart Lubbock’s lips shortly before he died” (curiously in the wake of her brother selling his account of the night).
Simon Shaw – Described as “a local from the village.” Michael Barrymore supposedly “ran off” to Mr. Shaw’s house to “buy himself thinking time [for two hours] before he was questioned by the police [at 7.49am].”
In addition, others, who’ve never been identified could also have possibly been present. If they were, they should come forward or be named by those listed above.
As a ticket package to a dinner with the Duchess of Sussex is laughably peddled for £795,000, Matthew Steeples reminds the much loathed ‘MeGain’s’ PR peddler Omid Scobie that “recollections may vary” as he heads to court to support Prince Harry
“Recollections may vary” was the late Queen Elizabeth II’s deservedly punchy response to the ongoing insults piled on her family by the Duke and Duchess of Sussex in March 2021 after the commencement of the couple’s train wreck ‘interview tour’ with the likes of Netflix and Oprah Winfrey.
Now, with the pomp and ceremony of the coronation over, Prince Harry is again causing trouble by forming part of a group action against Mirror Group News (MGN) at the High Court in London. Meanwhile, back in America, his whack job wife is back being ‘me-me-me-and-a-little-more-me’ and ‘doing the circuit’ of awards galas later this month in New York and Beverly Hills, California.
Laughably, guests at the Ms. Foundation Women ceremony – where the meddling menace formerly known as Meghan Markle will be awarded the ‘Woman of Vision’ award on 23rd May – are being touted tickets for astounding sums of upto £795,000 for a ‘lead’ package that includes 24 tickets. The cheapest offering comes in at £20,000 and includes hospitality for 10 guests.
In Beverly Hills, however, the event where the dastardly duchess will receive a digital media national winner award for her Spotify podcast Archetypes, is illustrative that Californians are tiring of this moaning Minnie. So-called ‘Sussex Squaddies’ will be able to nab a seat for ‘just’ £397.
Returning to the Prince Harry v Mirror Group News case, predictably Finding Freedom ‘co-author’ and guffawing gossip Omid Scobie has yet again stuck in his sticky fingers. Very much like Prince Andrew, who very distinctly remembered going to a Pizza Express on the night in 2001 when the then Virginia Roberts Giuffre claimed she was with the non-sweater, Scobie is now behaving as if he has “one of the great memories of all time” in Donald Trump-like fashion.
Offering, as ever, his undying support to the domineering duke and duchess, the little read YahooNewUK ‘executive editor (royals)’ has curiously not shared anything other than retweets since 8th May, but has submitted evidence in support of Prince Harry’s accusations in the case.
According to Newsweek’s Jack Royston: “[Scobie] approached Harry’s lawyer offering evidence. It allegedly tied [Piers] Morgan to illegal acts at his newspaper, [the Mirror].”
The filing reads:
“As a journalism student [Scobie] spent a week at the showbiz desk of the Sunday People [another MGN title]. He was given a list of mobile telephone [cellphone] numbers and a verbal description of how to listen to voicemails, as if it were a routine newsgathering technique.”
“In April/May 2002, he did additional work experience on the Daily Mirror’s 3AM column. He recalls during one of those days in the office the editor, Piers Morgan, came over to talk to someone about a story relating to Kylie Minogue and her [then] boyfriend James Gooding.”
“Mr Morgan asked how confident they were in the reporting, and was told that the information had come from voicemails. After informing the claimants [Prince Harry and others who are suing] about this information, Mr Scobie found an article online dated 11th May 2002 which appears to relate to that discussion.”
Going further, Royston added: “Scobie told the court he did not carry out the request to hack phones at the Sunday People viewing the practice as ‘immoral.’” He failed, however, to mention that in November 2021, the Duchess of Sussex was forced to apologise to the Appeal Court in London for making a misleading statement about her involvement with Finding Freedom in her another privacy case against The Mail on Sunday’s publishers.
The truth is no doubt stranger than fiction, but in the case of the anything-but-selfless Scobie: “Recollections may vary, recollections may indeed vary.”
Editor’s Note – Unlike as is the case in many publications, this article was NOT sponsored or supported by a third-party. Follow Matthew Steeples on Twitter at @M_Steeples.
This morning on Twitter, Matthew Steeples asked: “What is to be made of PR peddling pillock Omid Scobie’s allegations that he supposedly overheard Piers Morgan talking about a story gained via phone hacking whilst on work experience at ‘The Mirror’ some 21 years ago?” By 11:30am on Thursday 11th May 2023, the very clear majority of respondents had voted in favour of the option: “He’s telling porky pies.”
The Forthcoming Known Diary Dates Of The Not-So-Private ‘Privacy Seeking’ Duke & Duchess Of Sussex
10th May onwards for 6 to 7 weeks – The Duke of Sussex v Mirror Group Newspapers lawsuit at the High Court in London. The Honourable Mr Justice Fancourt is the presiding judge in the case.
Prince Harry will be cross-examined over the allegations and will be the first senior royal to appear in court since his aunt, Princess Anne, appeared and was found guilty in November 2002 after her English bull terrier dog, Dotty, bit two children in Windsor Great Park in April that year.
The prince forms part of a group litigation and amongst others bringing the action are the former Girls Aloud ‘star’ Cheryl Cole, the Coronation Street actor Michael Le Vell, the estate of the late singer George Michael, the model Paul Sculfor, the actor Ricky Tomlinson and the television presenter Ian Wright.
Prince Harry is represented by David Sherborne QC, whose previous clients have included ex-Prime Minister Tony Blair and his wife Cherie, actor Johnny Depp, actress Sienna Miller, model Kate Moss, ‘Wagatha Christie’ Coleen Rooney and the somewhat reclusive businessman James Stunt.
16th May – ‘MeGain’ to be awarded ‘Woman of Vision’ award at the Ziegfeld Ballroom at 141 West 54th Street in New York by the Ms. Foundation for Women.
Amongst those organising the event is the New York magazine journalist Gloria Steinem. Astoundingly, a package of two tables (24 seats) is offered for the sum of £795,000 ($1 million, €915,000 or درهم3.7 million); whether that includes an audience with the former Suits actress is unknown but those opting for this do get 2 Twitter posts about them or their company as a ‘Brucie bonus.’
Also on 16th May – Fifth ‘wedding’ anniversary of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex – if you believe the former Meghan Markle’s statement to Oprah Winfrey in March 2021 that: “Three days before our wedding, we got married. No one knows that. But we called the archbishop, and we just said, ‘Look, this thing, this spectacle is for the world, but we want our union between us.’ So, like, the vows that we have framed in our room are just the two of us in our backyard with the Archbishop of Canterbury.”
Justin Welby, the Archbishop of Canterbury, later called out this as utter baloney stating the only valid marriage occurred on 19th May 2018.
19th May – Fifth wedding anniversary of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex.
Tickets to this event are far cheaper and start at just £397 ($500, €458 or درهم1,836) – clearly the good people of Beverly Hills aren’t willing to pay as much to have a knees-up with the bestie of Sir Elton John and his titleless hubby David Furnish.
Twitter reacts to Matthew Steeples’ poll and Omid Scobie’s audacious antics…
As dimwitted dunce Sarah, Duchess of York again leaps to the defence of ropey ratbag Prince Andrew, we again ask ‘Feckless Fergie’ if she ever repaid loans taken from the croaked paedophile Jeffrey Epstein; it is time for some answers
Sarah, Duchess of York would most likely rather a photograph taken of her on 13th February 2010 to forever disappear. It was taken at the now infamous Lenox Hill, New York ‘Paedo Palace’ where Jeffrey Epstein conducted so much of his abuse and it features the royal ratbag grinning like ‘The Cheshire Cat’ alongside the since croaked paedophile’s also since deceased maid, Jun-Lyn Fontanilla.
Epstein, at that stage, was a convicted sex offender who had been released from jail on 22nd July 2009 and one would have thought someone would have advised the son of the late Queen Elizabeth II that hanging around in places of perversion might not be a good idea.
Just as was the case with her non-sweating, mate of Putin loving Bernie Ecclestone ex-husband – who himself spent a few days, where he claimed he was “ending the friendship,” at the “house of horror” at 9 East 71st Street, Lenox Hill subsequently on or about 6th December 2010 – it is clear that here is a woman lacking in the good sense to see that hanging around with a paedophile and his staff was never going to be wise.
Now the proud ‘owner’ – though she can’t sell it without the permission of her daughters whom created a clause effective to such on it – of a £5 million pad in ritzy Belgravia, London, ‘Feckless Fergie’ is currently on yet another tour of America flogging her tawdry tat.
This time in New York promoting a bonkbuster “romance novel” titled A Most Intriguing Lady, the 63-year-old raced to the defence of the ex-husband she weirdly still lives with. She made no comment as to whether they’d be moving from Royal Lodge to Frogmore Cottage, but claimed: “I feel that he [Prince Andrew is] a very good man. Zip.”
Still showing no sign of realising how loathed the Duke of York is, the redheaded rotter added:
“He’s had a few difficult years… [He’s] been going through such a tumultuous time… Since he stepped back [from royal duties] he doesn’t actually take taxpayers’ money. And I’m in a position where I can support him and the rest of the family through my work. And I’m really pleased and proud to do that.”
On Twitter this morning, Matthew Steeples took a very different view. He asked of the former Sarah Ferguson:
Editor’s Note – Unlike as is the case in many publications, this article was NOT sponsored or supported by a third-party. Follow Matthew Steeples on Twitter at @M_Steeples.
Pictured Top – Sarah, Duchess of York with Jeffrey Epstein’s maid Jun-Lyn Fontanilla (left) and promoting an aptly titled book named ‘Odd’ (right).
As grasping grifter Sarah, Duchess of York defends Prince Andrew whilst answering chosen questions on latest moneymaking tour in NYC, should she answer as to whether she ever repaid loans taken from Jeffrey Epstein? #Fergie#JeffreyEpstein#PrinceAndrewhttps://t.co/F45XUUqitD
This morning on Twitter, Matthew Steeples asked: “As grasping grifter Sarah, Duchess of York defends Prince Andrew whilst answering chosen questions on latest moneymaking tour in NYC, should she answer as to whether she ever repaid loans taken from Jeffrey Epstein?” As of 11:30-am on Tuesday 7th March, 42.9% of respondents agreed with the sentiment “yes; outraged she hasn’t.”A second photograph shows Prince Andrew’s ex-wife with Jeffrey Epstein’s maid and her husband Jojo Fontanilla also. Here was a woman who clearly liked spending time at ‘Paedo Palace’ and here was someone very comfortable to associate not only with her host, but also with his staff as well.In her defence, ‘Fergie’ was not the only famous person to pose with Jun-Lyn Fontanilla in Epstein’s New York mansion. President Bill Clinton (shown here with the maid and her husband Jojo, who also worked for Epstein) was another to get snapped with her whilst others included the actress Hilary Swank, the actor Chris Tucker and the politician John Kerry.‘Paedo Palace’ loan taking – The former Sarah Ferguson was snapped at Jeffrey Epstein’s New York mansion on 13th February 2010 with a maid named Jun-Lyn Fontanilla. She was clearly there to see this woman’s boss about her messy financial predicament or to accept his hospitality at the very least. It has been suggested that she took around £15,000 ($18,000, €16,900 or درهم66,100-) as a direct transfer from Epstein around this date and that she also got other “assistance” with her “problems” from him also. 9 East 71st Street (also known as ‘The Herbert N. Strauss Mansion’), Lenox Hill, New York, NY 10021, USA was sold for £36 million ($50 million, €42 million or درهم184 million) in March 2021, a sum 192% lower than the £69 million ($88 million, €74 million or درهم351 million) originally sought in September 2020.The “toe sucking twerp” that is ‘Fergie’ is someone whom many have excused over the years as “a bit simple” and “harmless.” She may well have taken everyone she met as “nice” and “kind,” but that she has repeatedly spent time hanging around wealthy sex fiends such as Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and Peter Nygård shows she’s simply prepared to put money above all else.Drunk in a car, playing char lady and mopping the floors at Royal Lodge or making a fool of herself whilst also drunk; the ‘public looks’ that Sarah, Duchess of York are illustrative of a woman beyond badly advised. It is time that this pointless prattler finally realised the error of her ways; of course, actually, she never will.
Given the live-in ex-wife at Royal Lodge, Windsor of supposedly skint ‘Randy Andy’ – a non-sweating man who got his long-suffering relatives to pay a supposed sum of circa £12 million to Virginia Roberts Giuffre, a woman he has previously claimed to have met – is in America to prattle on to anyone who pays to listen, perhaps she should be reminded of her own weird and even weirder warblings. They number:
Of sex, her and goats: “One of the worst headlines said 82% [of the population] would rather sleep with a goat than Fergie. It’s never left me.”
Of the royal family: “They tried to put the little redhead in a cage.”
Of her own family: “I do believe in family unity. I think forgiveness is key.”
Of the Duke of York: “A good man… In 1986, I married a very good man. Zip.”
Of supporting her disgraced ex-husband financially: “I will always be there [for Prince Andrew].”
“When Andrew went through a hard time, I used to be able to throw it to ‘The Boss.’”
“Since he stepped back [from royal duties] he doesn’t actually take taxpayers’ money and I’m in a position where I can support him and the rest of the family through my work. And I’m really pleased and proud to do that.”
“All I will say is that for many years now – it started with Budgie the Little Helicopter – I’ve really pushed to look after my girls and to contribute to the York family life.”
Of her daughters Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie: “Exceptional… I love my girlies, I’m so proud of them. They are exceptional children… If mum’s OK, they’re OK.”
Of the late Queen Elizabeth II: “More my mother than my mother… The Queen was like a hand of support behind your back without being there.”
“For the whole nation, for the world. Steadfast, consistent, iconic. [She had an] extraordinary ability to put someone at ease. I still now think it was such an honour [to have known her].”
“During the last three years, her poor son [was] going through such a tumultuous time… And I think HM was very relieved I could help her with him, so we became even closer, then.”
Of the late Queen’s corgis: “They’re very good boys, they’re very gentle. I think they knew that they weren’t to jump up and be naughty. They used to sit and watch the racing with her. And when you give them a biscuit, they don’t snatch. They’re very special, they’re national treasures.”
Of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex: “I have been judged all my life, and I have no judgment on the Sussexes.”
“It must be hard for Meghan and can I relate to her. I believe she is modern and fabulous. She was famous before. She is great. Why can’t Meghan be great? Why can’t she be celebrated? I have been in Meghan’s shoes, and I still am. There’s always a twist of negativity and it just gets so sad and tiring… I abhor bullying and I feel desperately sorry for the pain they must be going through.”
Of herself and her life: “I have been in the gutter.”
“I’m a brilliant mother. The best mother.”
“I don’t believe that any single person has the right to judge another person. I’m not in a position myself to make any judgments.”
Of food, family and dining: “As long as it is hot, wet and goes down the right way, it’s fine with me.”
“With every smell, I smell food. With every sight, I see food. I can almost hear food. I want to spade the whole lot through my mouth at Mach 2. Basta!”
“We all sit round the table and eat together. Andrew and I believe in total parent unity. We’re best friends.”
On the coronation of King Charles III: “Well I’ve decided the best thing about British around a coronation – although I’ve never been to one – I think we should, I should set up a tea room at the bottom of the drive with bunting and cakes.”
Of wanting to be a television star: “I would quite like to go on Dancing With The Stars. I would like somebody to teach me to tango. I do know the show and my children would be so proud of me.”
Of when she decided she wanted to bag a royal: “I met [Prince Andrew] when I was 12, and I said: ‘I’m going to marry him.’”
Of marriage, divorce and work: “I left my marriage knowing I’d have to work. I have.”
“I didn’t want a divorce, but had to because of circumstance.”
“I wish we’d never got divorced. He and I both wish we’d never divorced, but we did. I wish I could go back and be the bride again, but I can’t.”
Of her many, many mistakes: “I felt that I ostracised myself by my behaviour, by the past, by living with all the regrets of my mistakes, that I sort of wore a hair shirt and beat myself up most of the day thinking and regretting why did I make such a mistake. Why have I made so many mistakes?”
“You look at the devil in the face, which you do. Then you forgive, and you say: ‘OK, I’ve made almost a mistake that will never be forgotten,’ and forgive.”
“I was so out of control with desperation… I was looking for quick fixes in the places I wouldn’t normally look… I’ve been a huge overtrusting, idiotic, stupid woman that went to look for the perfect situation, and that’s all I can say really.”
On Thursday 20th August 1992, the ‘Daily Mirror’ shared what they called “the pictures they didn’t want you to see.” In them, a topless Duchess of York was shown having her toes sucked in the South of France by a Texan millionaire named John Bryan. Of the incident, the ‘Mirror’ later reported: “Royal writer Richard Kay claimed in the ‘Daily Mail’ that he received a message via pager from Princess Diana the night before the photos hit the newspaper stands. Diana’s message was simple: ‘The redhead’s in trouble.’”Questionable Friendships – In February 2020, ‘The Steeple Times’ reported on croaked paedophile Jeffrey Epstein’s chum (and his wife Sarah, Duchess of York’s financial sponsor) Prince Andrew having Bernie Ecclestone over to Royal Lodge, Windsor to celebrate his birthday. Whether this man “with qualities that would make Leona Helmsley look generous” brought Sloppy Giuseppes from Pizza Express (Woking branch) for the bash remains still unknown. Just as was the case for him and his ex-wife over Epstein, the Duke of York’s decision to keep Mr Ecclestone as a friend is something that he deserves to be questioned about given the ex-Formula 1 head honcho is due to go on trial in connection with a £400 million fraud by false representation case brought against him by His Majesty’s Revenue & Customs (HMRC) on 15th November 2023.
Sarah, Duchess of York’s support for the Duchess of Sussex is another example of her backing the wrong horse. In 2019, the feckless live-in ex-wife of ‘Randy Andy’ remarked: “It must be hard for Meghan and can I relate to her. I believe she is modern and fabulous. She was famous before. She is great. Why can’t Meghan be great? Why can’t she be celebrated? I have been in Meghan’s shoes, and I still am. There’s always a twist of negativity and it just gets so sad and tiring… I abhor bullying and I feel desperately sorry for the pain they must be going through.”
In 2018, the mother of Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie had a temper tantrum on ’60 Minutes Australia’ when questioned about seeking out cash from what she clearly must have known to be illegitimate sources.
Second part of interview with Matthew Steeples by Shaun Attwood about the former Meghan Markle watched over 25,000 times in 24 hours since it aired after first part is watched 160,000 times; Steeples again condemns hapless Prince Harry and his malignant menace wife
Having attracted 159,000 views for the first part of what has been titled Meghan Markle Expose: Part I, Matthew Steeples, editor-in-chief of The Steeple Times, returned to the small screen on Monday for Meghan Markle Expose: Part II with a 1:19:30-minute interview with the popular podcaster Shaun Attwood.
Aired on YouTube, the segment followed-up on topics discussed in the first part, but moved the narrative along to what might happen at King Charles III’s coronation on 6th May 2023.
Amongst topics discussed were:
Will or will not the Duke and Duchess of Sussex attend the coronation of King Charles on 6th May given the fallout from Spare?
If they do attend, what might their roles at that event be given they, like Prince Andrew, are no longer “working royals”?
What will be the situation if they do show-up, given the offensive comments they’ve made about amongst others the Queen Consort and the Prince and Princess of Wales?
What is the story behind the $10 million donation to Archewell and who is the mystery donor?
Could the truth of that donation relate more to tax affairs than to charitable motives?
What are the most recent developments in the case of Markle v Markle? Will the Duke and Duchess of Sussex be forced into handing over documentation from the Oprah interview and information about Finding Freedom and Spare?
What is the situation in the court case of Broughty v Boozy? Are the wheels falling off for Christopher Boozy after his Netflix appearance for Meghan and Harry?
What year was Meghan born? Was she born 4th August 1981 and is thus 41 or is she actually as old as 45?
Was Meghan a bully at college and was there a ‘hazing’ incident in which she allegedly glued the eyelashes of another girl whilst at Northwestern University, Chicago in the early 2000s?
Was the then Meghan Markle a “wild child” in those university years and prior and not little Miss Innocent campaigner as she now claims? “Burger King binger”, fake IDs, wild parties.
Why does Meghan associate with alleged bullies like Ellen DeGeneres given the proven “toxic workplace culture” that was proven when 10 former employees made accusations and 3 executives were made to leave?
Are Meghan and Harry being shunned by the powerful famous people they once coveted or are they just choosing to keep under the radar until the coronation is dealt with?
What is the truth of Meghan suggesting the Princess of Wales “was not a hugger” after the embrace with her ex-history teacher?
Does Prince Harry deserve criticism over the way Saha Walpole – the “awkward sex in a field” lady – was not told that he’d be writing about her in his book Spare?
Does the situation that follow illustrate that Prince Harry is just selfish and inconsiderate?
Does it show that he puts his personal profile and personal profit above all else?
Over 400 comments have already been received in response to the aired episode and amongst them were remarks including: “Thank you for getting the truth out there. This is what people need to listen to” and “Matthew is correct; so many don’t want to see them at the coronation.”
Going further, Brian Pollard added: “A possible resolution: Andrew and Harry should make a formal public apology and may then be allowed to attend the coronation (seated marginally). Meghan Markle should stay home” whilst Jonathan Bach concluded: “Can you imagine that heifer showing her radioactive smile at the coronation? The whole world would jointly throw-up.”
Elsewhere yesterday on the UK Royal Reels channel in a 3:41-minute feature, the first part of Meghan Markle Expose was given a worthy mention. In a feature titled: “Spot on!” the channel examined, the channel commended the interview with the presenter observing: “Steeples brought reliable news about Meghan to the interview… Steeples did not hold back on airing his thoughts. He goes through many theories about Meghan’s recent disappearance.” It can be watched below.
Editor’s Note – Unlike as is the case in many publications, this article was NOT sponsored or supported by a third-party. Follow Matthew Steeples on Twitter at @M_Steeples.
Of her claiming having got married the day before she actually did, Mr Markle stated: “Lying about the archbishop? How can you say: ‘We’ve been married three days before we got married’? Her lies are so obvious, I don’t know why she says them.”
Her very own half-sister, Samantha Markle, who is currently bringing a defamation case against her, has called her out as a liar on multiple occasions also. It has been proven that the duchess’s claim that she hasn’t seen her sibling in over 20 years was untrue given a photo of the pair together 14 years ago proves quite to the contrary.
Her very own half-brother, Thomas Jr., said of her: “I told Prince Harry, I think she’s going to ruin your life. She’s very shallow… She’s a phony, a bully, a jaded, shallow, conceited woman.”
The wife of Prince Harry has been called out on multiple occasions for spinning stories against other members of the royal family, most especially the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge.
Staff who’ve worked for her have complained that she is a bully and investigations into this remain ongoing.
The Duchess of Sussex is a known manipulator of the press and paparazzis and it has been claimed that she’ll “twist the truth” to get any headline she wants.
Questions remain as to how many times she’s actually been married in total. Some say twice, some say thrice.
What’s the truth about Meghan’s mother Doria Ragland? Is this clearly equally manipulative woman an honest and decent citizen or is she a jailbird who has spent time in the clink?
Did the ‘Montecito Meddler’ meet Prince Andrew or Prince Harry first? Rumours abound that she could have spent time and holidayed with the former as long ago as 2001 and that her claim to have no prior knowledge of the royal family until 2016 is just utter baloney.
Shaun Attwood interviewed Matthew Steeples on Sunday 12th February 2023 and first aired that interview on Monday 13th February 2023 at 7pm GMT on his YouTube.In the discussion, Steeples returned to the subject of how the Duke of Sussex remains under the thumb of his wife. He reminded viewers of the prince’s words: “What Meghan wants, Meghan gets” and illustrated the narcissistic tendencies of the Duchess of Sussex in detail.It must be remembered that the wicked woman formerly known as Meghan Markle claimed she knew nothing about the royal family before she met her now husband; this photograph of her in her youth outside Buckingham Palace in London proves quite to the contrary.For a couple who left for the sake of “privacy,” suggested Matthew Steeples, here are a pair who’ve done an awful lot of “publicity.” With the coronation on the horizon, we wait with baited breath to see what trouble that the malignant meddler Meghan and her drip of a husband will resort to next. “Shame on the pair of them!” concludes Steeples.
Has the Duchess of Sussex ditched boring blabber Omid Scobie and will his forthcoming ‘book’ just prove to be another bag of bilge?
Just as it has been revealed that Virginia Roberts Giuffre – the woman who received a sum estimated as anything upto £9.7 million ($12 million, €11 million or درهم44.1 million) from a man she never met if you believe his narrative, Prince Andrew – is about to pen her memoirs, a very boring blabber is preparing to blab yet again also.
Currently, Omid Scobie is doing the rounds (or what what he prefers to bombastically term “the beat”) talking about his forthcoming tittle-tattling tome which is to be titled Endgame. The sequel to the bag of bilge that was Finding Freedom will be published on 1st August and though this sapless spiv is clearly beginning early on his pontificating, promotional rounds, what is clear is that he has likely been scuttled by his puppet mistress, the currently ‘missing,’ mendacious menace formerly known as Meghan Markle.
“[The Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s] mere existence, their mere story has raised issues about misogyny within the institution and the monarchy; about unconscious bias and racism. And I know how Harry called it ‘unconscious bias,’ but I’m still going to call it racism because I think that it is only not racist when it’s unconscious. The second someone makes it conscious to you and you try and minimise it or skirt the topic or ‘recollections may vary’ it, that is racism… Even me saying that makes people feel uncomfortable.”
Speaking in September 2021, the British-Persian ‘journalist’ and boring blabber had described his last known encounter with the duke and duchess as involving a “big farewell hug.” Going further, at that time, he cringeworthily claimed: “Meghan told him: ‘It didn’t have to be this way.’ I think she wanted to share that last moment because it is a moment in history, but also to do it in an environment she felt safe in.”
Tellingly of the twaddle he’s subsequently peddled, the dimwitted dunce added in comments reported in The Independent: “He said he doesn’t ‘even know if the Sussexes like me, to be honest,’ adding that ‘press is press.’”
Updating the situation on Tuesday, the Daily Express’s Emma Crabtree turned to Prince Harry “accusing Scobie of writing ‘utter nonsense’ about Meghan’s fake kidnapping” and “lying” about a story he included in Finding Freedom about a “staged kidnapping.”
Commenting on this in the article, GB News host Dan Wootton “accused Scobie of being a sycophant to the shunned Sussexes by calling him a ‘hagiographer’ and slammed the authoritative tone of the royal commentator.”
Wootton added: “It all sounds very dramatic doesn’t it, and very authoritative from oddball Scobie… I would say to Scobie, don’t take it personally, after all Harry’s book was a pack of lies too.”
Meanwhile elsewhere yesterday, The Steeple Times was sent a ‘mindmap’ illustrating the links between the alleged ‘yacht girl’ that is the Duchess of Sussex and Prince Andrew and Harvey Weinstein. A fascinating illustration which we share below, this document was first published on a site named Project Fangirl on 18th November 2022, but where it could go further would be to add in names such as Ghislaine Maxwell, Markus Anderson, Piers Morgan and Scobie himself even. Here, yet again, is proof that the world of ‘MeGain’ is nothing but a murky, mucky mess and one that petulant pillock Prince Harry should never have got himself involved in.
Editor’s Note – Unlike as is the case in many publications, this article was NOT sponsored or supported by a third-party.
Pictured Top – A rather startled Omid Scobie (left) and his puppet mistress the Duchess of Sussex (right) with her allegedly gay ‘bestie’ Markus Anderson.
The ‘mindmap’ detailing the links between the Duchess of Sussex and Harvey Weinstein is a fascinating one and includes the likes of Larry King, Amol Rajan, Rachael Ray, Lindsay Roth and Sunshine Sachs. There is, however, much more to this and many more noxious names deserve to be added; amongst them Markus Anderson, Ghislaine Maxwell and Omid Scobie.Omid Scobie is most definitely plastic and not fantastic, but how long will he last without his puppet mistress giving him permission to lie on her behalf? Perhaps, in the coming months, this definite ‘melt’ will just melt away and then we can all say: “Good bloody riddance.”The House of York and the Houses of Paedophiles – In 2006, the pugnacious paedophiles Harvey Weinstein, Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell partied at Windsor Castle with the Duke of York, his ex-wife Sarah, Duchess of York and their two daughters Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie. Did nobody think to do a test on the guest list for criminal perverts? Clearly not.On 19th December 2016, the dimwitted dunce Sarah, Duchess of York attended a “VIP screening” of ‘Lion’ hosted by Harvey Weinstein and Georgina Chapman at Soho House in London. Whether Markus Anderson arranged this event is unknown, but the former Meghan Markle’s mate Princess Eugenie of York most definitely showed up also.The friendship between Oprah Winfrey – a regular on the roster of spinners for the Duke and Duchess of Sussex and their deviancy – and Harvey Weinstein cannot be shown to be anything but clear. This picture proves how much the former clearly adored the latter now jailed sex offender.Omid Scobie has been called out by his old chum’s husband Prince Harry as nothing but a muckspreading teller of untruths. His answer? “Surprise.”Scobie claims to be “stuck in a fever dream” for now; likely soon, this washed-up wazzock will just be a forgotten syllable in a chapter that the royal family would actually rather just forever forget.
Where has the never-normally-far-from-the-limelight meddling menace formerly known as Meghan Markle vanished to?
A woman known normally for displaying more front than Harrods, the deviant diva that is the Duchess of Sussex has literally vanished off the face of the planet. Normally, as she has repeatedly said in the past “always moving together,” the fact that the “like salt and pepper” duo that are her and her hapless husband have not been seen together in weeks is telling.
Said by some to be allowing Prince Harry his own space to promote his tittle-tattling tome Spare, ‘Moaning Meg’ is likely, given the flooding that devastated the surrounding area recently, not at her £14 million Montecito mansion.
Instead, this hard-faced harridan, it has been claimed, could have returned to her old chums from her Suits days in Canada or possibly headed to Washington to begin what she supposedly desires most next – a career in politics. As Prince Harry once said: “What Meghan wants, Meghan gets” and a frontline role in the Democratic Party is very much on her tick list.
For this former actress, this move would likely, however, come too soon. Presently, even the once loathed and detested Queen Consort, Camilla, is more popular than her in America – with an official poll ranking the former -13 and the latter -8.
Aside from facing upto and settling a lawsuit from her far more sensible sister, Samantha Markle, it might be better for this deranged duchess to do something else. It is time for this alleged former ‘yacht girl’ to Prince Andrew to head off to Siberia and if they’re not divorcing – as some have predicted – she ought to take her seriously stupid sidekick with her; ‘MeGain’ ought to get gone and simply never come back.
Editor’s Note – Unlike as is the case in many publications, this article was NOT sponsored or supported by a third-party.
Where has the mendacious menace formerly known as Meghan Markle vamoosed to? She has literally vanished off the face of the planet but where has she gone?
Of her claiming having got married the day before she actually did, Mr Markle stated: “Lying about the archbishop? How can you say: ‘We’ve been married three days before we got married’? Her lies are so obvious, I don’t know why she says them.”
Her very own half-sister, Samantha Markle, who is currently bringing a defamation case against her, has called her out as a liar on multiple occasions also. It has been proven that the duchess’s claim that she hasn’t seen her sibling in over 20 years was untrue given a photo of the pair together 14 years ago proves quite to the contrary.
Her very own half-brother, Thomas Jr., said of her: “I told Prince Harry, I think she’s going to ruin your life. She’s very shallow… She’s a phony, a bully, a jaded, shallow, conceited woman.”
The wife of Prince Harry has been called out on multiple occasions for spinning stories against other members of the royal family, most especially the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge.
Staff who’ve worked for her have complained that she is a bully and investigations into this remain ongoing.
The Duchess of Sussex is a known manipulator of the press and paparazzis and it has been claimed that she’ll “twist the truth” to get any headline she wants.
Questions remain as to how many times she’s actually been married in total. Some say twice, some say thrice.
What’s the truth about Meghan’s mother Doria Ragland? Is this clearly equally manipulative woman an honest and decent citizen or is she a jailbird who has spent time in the clink?
Did the ‘Montecito Meddler’ meet Prince Andrew or Prince Harry first? Rumours abound that she could have spent time and holidayed with the former as long ago as 2001 and that her claim to have no prior knowledge of the royal family until 2016 is just utter baloney.
Could the Duchess of Sussex be with her allegedly gay ‘bestie’ Markus Anderson? The Soho House employee is always close to anything murky that is going on with this mendacious minx and he’s undoubtedly the first person she turns to with any problem.Could the wicked wench formerly known as Meghan Markle be with her ever-willing to say anything she tells him PR peddler Omid Scobie? Prince Harry has made out that ‘Finding Freedom’ included clear lies in recent days whilst promoting ‘Spare’ and in response Scobie has clearly begun to turn on his masters. In comments, reported on in the ‘Daily Express,’ the ‘author’ remarked: “In many ways, how can a regular person not have Sussex fatigue at this point? I almost feel it’s like my duty to follow it every step of the way, but I can understand how general members of the public have just had enough of hearing about the royal dramas in general. I sympathise with the Sussexes in some ways, because they’re only now getting to join the story at this very late stage. For many years, they weren’t able to share their side. They watched others try and tell versions of it or they sat back and watched things reported about them that they didn’t agree with or didn’t feel were a fair representation of themselves. So now they’ve come in with their versions of events, with their stories and are filling in the gaps that we didn’t know about. But of course, it comes after years and years of coverage. So, I think people are starting to get a little tired of the story in general.”Could the deranged diva Duchess of Sussex and her mouthy mother Doria Ragland be hiding out in Canada or could she be spinning herself into the world of politics in Washington even? The truth is always stranger than fiction with ‘MeGain’ and God only knows what this psycho will do next.
Ninety-minute interview with Samantha Markle watched by over 40,000 since premiering 13 hours ago; in it the Duchess of Sussex’s sister slams both her and her husband Prince Harry
Fresh from having shared several stories with The Steeple Times in recent weeks, the sensible sister of the murky meddler formerly known as Meghan Markle gave a 1:31-minute interview on Friday evening on Shaun Attwood’s YouTube channel.
In it, Matthew Steeples and Jennifer Hopkins joined Attwood for a wide-ranging chat with Samantha Markle that delved into the fallout from Prince Harry’s tittle-tattling tome Spare. Markle spoke via telephone and didn’t mince her words and whilst Attwood and Hopkins calmly moderated, Steeples added a somewhat ‘refreshed’ perspective with some punchy questions and observations.
Beginning with a focus on the book that most would rather be actually ‘spared’ from, other topics included numbered the situation created by Marlene Headley (AKA ‘Ngozi Fulani’) with Lady Susan Hussey and her charity being under investigation by the Charity Commission. Allegations about the Duke of Sussex being involved in an incident in Jamaica, Christopher Bouzy and Omid Scobie’s PR peddling and those lies about Air New Zealand tickets were also touched upon.
Commenting afterwards, viewer Tracey Reed observed: “This is the most forthright interview I’ve seen with Samantha yet.” Another, going by the pseudonym ‘Ten Ten,’ added: “Samantha Markle is so well spoken and articulate. She delivers such complexity in such a clear manner. It’s evident that she’s a very intelligent person and a very genuine person.”
Editor’s Note – Unlike as is the case in many publications, this article was NOT sponsored or supported by a third-party. Follow Matthew Steeples on Twitter at @M_Steeples.
Pictured Top – Samantha Markle with her sister Meghan in happier times prior to the latter ghosting her birth family.
Shaun Attwood’s YouTube channel has over 744,000 subscribers and though any video uploaded there tends to trend as a result, that this particular episode has attracted over 40,000 views in just 13 hours is telling of the interest in the saga of Prince Harry and his decidedly deviant other half.
Separately in a poll yesterday, Matthew Steeples asked his Twitter followers: “Where is Meghan Markle hiding out?” The majority response thus far from the 400 who’ve voted are of the belief that she is back in Canada. It remains to be seen if that is the case and what this currently very unusually and strangely silent woman will do next.Jennifer Hopkins and Shaun Attwood took the lead in questioning Samantha Markle in an interview conducted by telephone on Friday evening and premiered at 9pm on Sunday 15th January 2022.Mockery of Prince Harry’s memoir ‘Spare’ has been relentless since its launch earlier this month. It seems that the Duke of Sussex has well and truly dug a hole and has continued to fail to realise that when you’re in a hole, it is generally wise to stop digging.What’s next for this deviant duo? Money motivated and revenge reekers most definitely, the popularity of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex has plummeted since not only the publication of ‘Spare’ but also since that God awful interview with Oprah Winfrey in 2021. A recently released YouGov poll found: “Just 26% of Britons have a positive view of Prince Harry, the lowest level since we started tracking in 2011. This represents a seven-point drop since the previous survey in early December. Currently, approach two thirds of Britons (64%) have a negative view of the fifth in line to the throne, up from 59%. Even younger Britons, who generally tended to hold favourable views of Prince Harry, are now divided, with 41% having a positive impression and 41% a negative one. In December’s survey there had been a twenty-point lead, with 49% holding a positive view and 29% a negative one.”Some Sainsbury’s stores have confined the Duke of Sussex’s book to where it truly belongs – next to the bog roll. In other shops it has been placed next to wet wipes and even Bella Mackie’s book ‘How To Kill Your Family.’
Air New Zealand call out Prince Harry’s lies about bookings to fly Thomas Markle and again illustrate that him and ‘Mendacious Meg’ find the truth highly inconvenient
Whilst also Sir Freddie admitted this his “devotion to his work possibly short-changed all his wives,” another frequent flyer with a problematic wife – though generally himself prone to using land of olive oil production loving Sir Elton John’s private jets rather than anything as common as Easyjet – named the Duke of Sussex has been called out after telling ‘porky pies’ about booking flights with Air New Zealand in his tittle-tattling tome Spare.
Responding to claims in the book that the former Meghan Markle’s now husband had booked first-class flights to bring her father, Thomas, to Britain from Mexico, the airline yesterday tweeted: “Introducing #SussexClass. Apparently, coming soon.”
Air New Zealand later added that it has never operated flights between Mexico and the United Kingdom and equally confirmed, that they do not offer a first-class service. Speaking to the New Zealand Herald, a spokesperson for the firm very clearly added: “We’ve never had flights between Mexico and the UK. And we only have Business Premier.”
Responding on social media, members of the Twitterati then understandably piled on – with one writing: “Any spare seats, anyone?”
Editor’s Note – Unlike as is the case in many publications, this article was NOT sponsored or supported by a third-party.
The tweet in question has well and truly made yet another mockery of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex.Sir Freddie Laker’s remarkable life story was immortalised in a book by Roger Eglin and Berry Ritchie in 1980.Here was a frequent flyer who was a lot more fun than the noxious nuisances that are the Duke and Duchess of Sussex.Described as a “Russian oligarch kind of jet,” the Bombardier Global 6000 aircraft that the couple returned to California on from Farnborough in June 2022 emitted nearly 60 tonnes of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. Of this, the ‘Daily Mail’ stated: “Under the terms of the Paris Agreement objective of keeping global warming below 2C, each person’s carbon budget should be no more than 2.1 tonnes per year – meaning Harry and Meghan exceeded this by nearly 15 times in just one flight. As the Sussexes also flew into Britain on a private jet, and assuming it was the same aircraft, their overall return trip would have exceeded the annual limit by nearly 30 times. By comparison, the carbon emission rating of flying from Heathrow to LA in an economy-class seat on a commercial aircraft is 1.4 tonnes, according to climate consultancy Cube6.” They added: “The Queen’s grandson previously described climate change as one of the ‘most pressing issues we are facing’, and told Oprah Winfrey during the couple’s bombshell interview last year: ‘We need to do better about stopping or allowing the things that are causing so much harm to so many of us at the source, rather than being distracted by the symptom.’”In September 2019, it was reported that since marrying the alleged former “yacht girl” Meghan Markle, the now King Charles III’s second son is said to have used private plans for six out of ten flights despite claiming to travel commercial 99% of the time. Here is a condescending couple who tell others what to do and then who themselves go and do the exact opposite without shame or explanation.
The pathetic attention seeking son of the late Diana, Princess of Wales has previously claimed that his decision to use private aircraft is because he is determined to “keep his family safe.” Clearly immune to the fact that the vast majority of the public who fly commercial are perfectly safe, here is a brat who clearly has no conception of how hypocritical he and his sordid sidekick truly are.
Matthew Steeples suggests Prince Harry’s revolting revelations about his “todger” to be inappropriate given he moved to the US to become a more “private” person
It has become clearer and clearer in recent days that Prince Harry doesn’t understand the concept of “public” and “private.” Whilst this renegade royal moved to America in 2016 as he and his wicked wastrel wife supposedly didn’t want to be “public” anymore, their inability to remain “private” in the time since is proof that here are a mendacious pair of meddlers with no concept that with “rights” come “responsibilities.”
Turning to another “private member” mentioned in his memoirs Spare – of which every single member of the public I’ve spoken with since their release has responded with words to the effect of: “Please SPARE us anymore from that drip” – this morning, the Daily Mail’s Richard Eden shared a retweet that included a clip of the Duke of Sussex reading aloud from his tittle-tattling tome.
In his tweet – captioned “Have a listen to this clip, if you dare… #PrinceHarry #Spare #royal” – Eden tellingly selected a tweet by a former Penguin Random House book editor named Dominic Wakeford.
In that tweet, Wakeford – whose former employers, of course, are the publishers of Spare – wrote: “This book is a Freudian nightmare.” The tweet has, to date, been shared some 5,000 times and liked by over 56,000 accounts and in it, a 0:33-second clip read by King Charles III’s second son is included.
Prince Harry shockingly shares:
“My penis was oscillating between extremely sensitive and borderline traumatised. The last place I wanted to be was Frostnipistan.”
“I’d been trying some home remedies including one recommended by a friend. She’d urged me to apply Elizabeth Arden cream. ‘My mum used that on her lips. You want me to put that on my todger?’ ‘It works Harry, trust me.’”
“I found the tube and the minute I opened it, the smell transported me through time. It felt as if though my mother was right there in the room and I took a smidge and applied it down there.”
Responding, one member of the Twitterati observed: “He’s thinking of his mother as he applies the cream to his nether regions. My God, he really is a tuppence short of a shilling and what bright spark thought this was worthy of inclusion? I’m certain Harry expected the sympathy vote, but he comes across as stark raving mad!”
Another added of the former Meghan Markle’s puppet’s product placement attempt: “For years, Elizabeth Arden has been my trusty companion. I can never feel the same about it EVER again. I mean, I knew it was a cure, but…”
Editor’s Note – Unlike as is the case in many publications, this article was NOT sponsored or supported by a third-party.
Pictured Top – The world has reacted to the Duke of Sussex’s first ‘book’ by mocking him mercilessly. Aside from mocking him up as a “colossal tit,” this randy royal’s raging romps have been shot down by booksellers also. In Swindon, a “cheeky” retailer named Bert’s Books displayed ‘Spare’ next to a copy of Bella Mackie’s ‘How To Kill Your Family” in what Sky News termed a “light-hearted nod to his allegations against the royal family.”
Prior to getting it on with the mendacious menace then known as Meghan Markle – a wicked wastrel woman whom may have been married twice or maybe even three times – the second son of the late Diana, Princess of Wales was quite happy to fool around in all sorts of ways – some more curious than others. Whether Elizabeth Arden creams were involved remains unknown.Elsewhere this morning on social media emails sent ‘Ginge and Cringe’ have been doing the rounds. In one of them came yet again further proof that these rotten ratbag royals DID cooperate with Omid Scobie and Carolyn Durand for their – like ‘Spare’ now also – bargain basement bag-of-bilge book about their avaricious antics. It is time now for Omid Scobie to be called out for what he truly is; here is not an independent minded author but here instead is a pointless puppet controlled PR peddler answerable to only woman – the mendacious menace formerly known as Meghan Markle.Another popular royal commentary account on Twitter going by the name ‘FawnOverMeGain’ went further and shared allegations about the Duke of Sussex on Tuesday. Whilst we very clearly point out that these allegations are completely unsubstantiated as of the present moment, that the tempestuous royal is accused of “making Prince Andrew look like a saint” is most definitely notable.
The Twitterati reacts to the Duke of Sussex sharing a sickening story about his “private member” (and a pugnacious plug for Elizabeth Arden’s cosmetic products)…
