Category: Prince Andrew – Duke of York

  • Who Did Jeffrey Epstein & Ghislaine Maxwell Sex Traffic Their Victims To? Unsealing of Epstein Documents, New Book About Maxwell

    Who Did Jeffrey Epstein & Ghislaine Maxwell Sex Traffic Their Victims To? Unsealing of Epstein Documents, New Book About Maxwell

    As 200 pages of transcripts about the 2006 investigation into paedophile Jeffrey Epstein are unsealed, a new book – released Thursday – examines “who is permitted to speak” about sexual abuse by an abuse victim present at mucky madam Ghislaine Maxwell’s 2021 trial; One key question still remains tellingly unanswered: “Who did these two monsters actually sex traffic their victims to?”

    Just after The Observer’s Stephanie Merritt reviewed abuse victim Lucia Osborne-Crowley’s new book about her experiences attending the trial of the convicted sex offender Ghislaine Maxwell on Sunday, yesterday Peruvian born Circuit Judge The Honorable Luis Delgado of the 15th Judicial Court of Florida released nigh on 200 pages of previously embargoed documents concerning the 2006 investigation into allegations against Jeffrey Epstein.

     

    Explaining why yet more information about a megalomaniac monster he himself termed “the most infamous pedophile [sic] in American history” were being made public now, the judge observed:

     

    “Details in the record will be outrageous to decent people.”

     

    “The testimony taken by the Grand Jury concerns activity ranging from grossly unacceptable to rape – all of the conduct at issue is sexually deviant, disgusting, and criminal.”

     

    “Epstein is indeed notorious and infamous and is widely reported to have flaunted his wealth while cavorting with politicians, billionaires, and even British royalty.”

     

    “It is understandable that given those reports the public has a great curiosity about what was widely reported by news [agencies] as ‘special treatment’ regarding his prosecution.”

     

    Going further, Joseph Abruzzo, Clerk of the Circuit Court and Comptroller for Palm Beach, added:

     

    “When I became Clerk of the Circuit Court and Comptroller, I promised that I would leave no stone unturned to ensure the release of the Jeffrey Epstein Grand Jury records.”

     

    “We are making these important documents available to the public to ensure transparency to the people of Palm Beach County that we serve every day, and to the international community that has closely followed the Epstein case.”

     

    “It was legislation our office championed that led to the release of these grand jury records… It is our hope that the release of these records gives peace of mind to our community and gives Jeffrey Epstein’s victims the closure they deserve.”

     

    The release of the documents came about after Florida Governor Ron DeSantis signed a bill in February allowing such transcripts to be made public on or after 1st July 2024. Until now, Grand Jury documents normally remain permanently sealed.

     

    To buy a copy of The Lasting Harm: Witnessing the Trial of Ghislaine Maxwell by Lucinda Osborne-Crowley for a discounted price whilst supporting independent bookshops, go to our Bookshop.org page by clicking here on mobile devices or via the embed below on desktop devices.

    Elsewhere, in her article for The Observer, Merritt shared of The Lasting Harm: Witnessing the Trial of Ghislaine Maxwell – which is to be published on American Independence Day, Thursday 4th July:

     

    “At the heart of Lucia Osborne-Crowley’s account of the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, The Lasting Harm, is a question about who is permitted to speak on the subject of sexual, particularly childhood, abuse. Osborne-Crowley is the author of two previous books, I Choose Elena and My Body Keeps Your Secrets, both of which examine the ongoing trauma of her childhood grooming by a sports coach, and a violent rape by a stranger at 15. This, then, is the indelible experience she brings to her court reporting on this most sensitive of issues.”

     

    Quoting Osborne-Crowley, Merritt added:

     

    “‘I have been accused many times of being a biased journalist because of my history of abuse. To that I say: yes, I am biased. Everybody is, whether we own it or not.’ She goes on to say, ‘the journalists I met at the Maxwell trial – mostly men in their 40s – who did not have any experience of sexual trauma are also biased. These issues have never affected their lives and so they subscribe to a patriarchal, societal and defensive narrative;’ one that does not, she argues, take into account the pervasive effects of trauma and shame on victims, particularly when it comes to speaking up about the crimes.”

     

    “For the duration, Osborne-Crowley got up at 1.30am to stand in line until the courthouse opened, to be sure that one of those seats would be hers; for almost five weeks she sat ‘a foot away’ from Maxwell while her victims were questioned. Despite this proximity, Maxwell exists as a shadowy figure in the courtroom sections, a constant presence who is also a notable absence. She doesn’t speak until the verdict, and speech attributed to her at the time of the abuse is taken from the testimony of the women.”

     

    “The Lasting Harm makes for painful reading, and the author is frank about what the process cost her personally – two stints in a trauma clinic as her immersion in the details of Jeffrey Epstein and Maxwell’s crimes triggers her own memories. She is unequivocal about the purpose of her work – she quotes the investigative journalist Julie K. Brown, who says ‘journalism is about giving a voice to the powerless,’ and in this, Osborne-Crowley has succeeded admirably. The fact that none of Epstein’s male associates has yet been held to account suggests that there is a long way to go.”

     

    Both developments in this matter add to the narrative of knowledge about the vile crimes of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, but one thing they continue to fail to do is this: They continue to keep the names of the powerful fellow monsters these two twisted toe rags sex trafficked their victims to firmly under wraps.

     

    Going further, one could observe, that whilst many names of presidents, politicians and personalities continue to swirl around in the context of this sordid case, nothing much seems to be done about bringing them to justice. It has been all too easy for the claim of “I knew them, but I didn’t know what they did” to be bandied around for too long now and whilst ‘names not proven of anything (yet)’ including the likes of ex-Barclays banker Jes Staley have fallen because of his financial links and film fiddler Harvey Weinstein was jailed for his own sexual crimes, so many others allegedly deeply connected to Epstein and Maxwell continue to thrive and indeed prosper on their own terms. Some of them may be innocent, but many of them most certainly are not.

     

    As I have said again and again, there will be no satisfaction until the day the actual co-conspirators are finally named and shamed and brought to book. The powerful and the privileged should not be allowed to be continue to think that they are above the law; it is time for true justice to be served.

     

    Editor’s note – Unlike as is the case in many publications, this article was NOT sponsored or supported by a third-party. Follow Matthew Steeples on Twitter at @M_Steeples and watch his shows discussing true crime and all matter of other topics on YouTube at @mjs2781.

     

    A message from our editorial team – Thank you for reading this article. We’re more reliant on your support than ever as the shift in consumer habits brought about by coronavirus and the cost-of-living crisis impacts our advertisers. If you haven’t already, please consider supporting our trusted, fact-checked journalism by supporting our work via Patreon.

     

    Harvey-Weinstein-Jeffrey-Epstein-Ghislaine-Maxwell
    A trio of sex fiends – Harvey Weinstein, Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.
    Joseph Abruzzo Luis Delgado
    The lawmakers who revealed nigh on 200 pages more about Epstein’s 2006 legal wranglings – Clerk of the Circuit Court and Comptroller for Palm Beach Joseph Abruzzo and Circuit Judge The Honorable Luis Delgado of the 15th Judicial Court of Florida.
    Donald and Melania Trump Jeffrey Epstein Ghislaine Maxwell
    Was Melania Trump trafficked by Epstein and Maxwell? Jeffrey Epstein claimed to have been the one to have introduced the then Melania Knauss to Donald Trump. He was known to favour ‘girls’ of her type and it could indeed be true that Epstein met Knauss before Knauss met Trump though Wikipedia states that “the Kit Kat Club is often described as where they met.” They add: “The exact details of when and where [there first meeting] took place are unclear.”
    Debbie Staley Jes Staley
    Swivel eyed Deborah Nitzan Staley and her casino banker husband Jes Staley were such close associates of Jeffrey Epstein that they spent time on his Little St. James island. Of him, Wikipedia state: “In June 2023 it was reported that Staley wrote on December 26, 2009 – while Epstein was on house arrest for procuring a child for prostitution and of soliciting a prostitute in Florida – ‘Fun tonight. What do we do next?????’ Epstein replied saying his driver whom he described as ‘former dea [Drug Enforcement Administration]’ and ‘armed,’ would pick him up in St. Thomas in the Virgin Islands. Epstein continued, ‘helicopter also available for a tour around , … remember I own the two big marinas.. yacht haven grand, in st thomas and the marina at red hook… you can use my atv’s jet ski ,gym etc.’ Later that month Staley wrote to Epstein, ‘Arrived at your harbor. Someday, we have to do this together.’” In November 2021, because of the stench associated with his links to Epstein, Staley was forced to resign from as CEO of Barclays.
    Rudy Giuliani
    On Hill.TV in July 2019, Rudy Giuliani claimed that the fallout from the Jeffrey Epstein sex trafficking case was “obviously going to implicate a lot of people –I can’t tell you who but it’s not going to end up with just Jeffrey Epstein.” Of the now disgraced, disbarred and bankrupted politician, in November 2022, crusading author Kirby Sommers remarked: “It’s clear that my research upset many of the people in the trafficking ring connected to Epstein/Maxwell. Seems so many are connected. Even Rudy Giuliani who was the Mayor of New York.”
    Peter Mandelson and Jeffrey Epstein
    Another close associate who was “particularly close” to Jeffrey Epstein was Peter Mandelson. Lord Mandelson – whom the paedophile nicknamed ‘Petie’ – stayed at Epstein’s New York ‘Paedo Palace’ whilst the financier was serving 18 months for soliciting prostitution from a minor and was also photographed with him at the since croaked deviant’s apartment in Paris in 2007 and in St Barts in 2005.
  • The Lights Are On But No One Should Be Home… Royal Ratbag Prince Andrew SHOULD Be Turfed Out Of Royal Lodge

    The Lights Are On But No One Should Be Home… Royal Ratbag Prince Andrew SHOULD Be Turfed Out Of Royal Lodge

    As Prince Andrew and Sarah, Duchess of York fall into yet another Daphne Barak trap, Matthew Steeples suggests this dimwitted pair of dunces SHOULD now be turfed out of Royal Lodge

    Neither non-sweater Prince Andrew nor his “needy and greedy,” live-in ex-wife Sarah, Duchess of York are known as Britain’s brightest brainboxes. Now, though, with news that they’re “digging their heels” in and refusing to leave Royal Lodge, Windsor comes further proof that this pugnacious pair of pillocks simply cannot read the room and that they clearly most definitely realise that the writing is one the world.

     

    Not the brightest bulbs in the box and in fact also clearly the dimmest dunces in the royal family, the ‘Grand Old Duke of Broke’ and his repeatedly nigh on bankrupt sidekick, if Daphne Barak – a PR peddler very tellingly associated with not only ‘Feckless Fergie,’ but also Hillary Clinton, Ghislaine Maxwell and her own very own Jeffrey Epstein chum uncle, former Prime Minister of Israel Ehud Barak – is to be believed, are now supposedly seeking a “showdown” with King Charles and the new Prince of Wales over whether or not they should be able to remain at the royal residence they’ve occupied for some thirty years.

     

    In an article, penned by Barak for this morning’s The Mail on Sunday and clearly penned with assistance from the Yorks themselves, yet more unnamed sources claimed:

     

    “Friends of the Yorks say Andrew, who was forced to step back as a front-line Royal because of his association with paedophile millionaire Jeffrey Epstein, is ‘refusing to budge’ from Royal Lodge. They say he’s in low spirits and has become reclusive. One friend said: ‘He is so fragile. He’s refusing to see anybody. This has been his family home for the past 20 years. Is it really sensible to kick him out?’”

     

    “‘He’s concerned that now the Coronation is over, the knives are out. He’s worried that the Royals might even turn off the utilities to get him out of there. But we’re dealing with human beings, not real estate.’”

     

    “‘If Charles wants Andrew to play ball and help the family through these difficult times, aren’t there better ways of going about it?’”

     

    “‘Why not do the decent thing, sit down and talk? If they need the house for William, perhaps Andrew should be told. Perhaps William should invite his uncle for tea and explain.’”

     

    “‘Or why doesn’t Charles invite his brother for a meeting and ask him if he’d leave Royal Lodge to help his nephew and the future of the monarchy? And agree a schedule acceptable to both sides.’”

     

    “‘Is a little decency so difficult? There are real people at the heart of all this. He’s just lost his mother. Who, straight after that, would want to be evicted by his brother?’”

     

    At the end of this very clearly ‘Randy Andy’ and ‘Feckless Fergie’ placed puff piece, Donald Trump supporting Daphne Barak then proceeds to promote her latest book, Struggling for One America, and “pop culture scoops.” The article’s mere existence proves that the without-any-sense-of-sense Duke of York and Sarah, Duchess of York have yet still to understand the concept of “with friends like these who needs enemies.”

     

    Editor’s Note – Unlike as is the case in many publications, this article was NOT sponsored or supported by a third-party. Follow Matthew Steeples on Twitter at @M_Steeples.

     

    Pictured Top – Guffawing goon Prince Andrew and his grimacing grabber sidekick Sarah, Duchess of York; their current crib Royal Lodge, Windsor. How long will these dimwits be able to remain there?

     

    This morning on Twitter, Matthew Steeples asked: “Should ‘Grand Old Duke of Broke’ Prince Andrew and his ‘needy and greedy’ live-in ex-wife Sarah, Duchess of York be turfed out of Royal Lodge, Windsor and should their utilities be turned off to aid the process?” By 11:30am on Sunday 14th May 2023, the majority of respondents favoured the answer: “Yes; send in the bailiffs.”
    Royal-Lodge-1
    Grade II listed Royal Lodge, Windsor Great Park, Windsor, SL4 2JD has been home to Prince Andrew since he took a 75-year lease on it from the Crown Estate in August 2003. He paid around £1 million for it and had to agree to spend £7.5 million at September 2002 prices excluding VAT on the building’s renovation. In January 2022, the building was valued as being worth a sum of £30 million on the open market.
    Royal Lodge entrance gates
    The entrance gates to the house are suitably grand for the known to be beyond pompous second son of the late Queen Elizabeth II and the late Duke of Edinburgh. For the Coronation, ‘Fergie’ promised to offer coronation chicken sandwiches at the end of the drive to the public. No photographs of her doing such have emerged; proof yet again that this self-publicist is nothing but a self-serving and self-centred piece of rubbish.
    Royal Lodge interior
    A reception room in the royal residence. Regular guests here are said to include the coffin dodging skinflint Bernie Ecclestone – a diminutive dwarf awaiting a trial for a fraud estimated at £400 million later this year. Supposedly, not many others choose to visit the croaked paedophile Jeffrey Epstein’s former ‘bestie’ since his juggernauth wreck of an interview with Emily Maitlis for ‘Newsnight’ anymore. Should the public feel sorry for the non-sweating, Pizza Express loving sort? We say: “Certainly not.”
    Frogmore-Cottage
    Frogmore Cottage received a £2.4 million ‘MeGain makeover.’ At the time, a predictably unnamed “royal source” told the ‘Daily Mail’ of the two orangeries added: “Natural light is important for the Sussexes as Meghan misses the LA sunshine.” A new kitchen at the property was said to have cost in excess of £100,000 whilst the predictably ‘woke’ wench formerly known as Meghan Markle also demanded all paints used must be from the vegan and chemical free £74 a tin Auro range. Somehow, however, one could not imagine pompous Prince Andrew and his live-in grifter ex-wife feeling suitable for their occupation considering how pretentious the pair of them are.
    Guffawing Fergie and Randy
    The rotten associations and poor decisions of the Duke of York and Sarah, Duchess of York are the reason that this reprehensible royal and his sidekick should be thrown out of a house that is also clearly far too large to be occupied by just two grifters and those that wait on their every want and need. It is time that the former home of the late Queen Mother be given to a family that might actually enjoy it and to a family that might actually use it for its true purpose – entertaining others for the benefit of the nation.
    Duke of York Ghislaine Maxwell
    It should NOT be forgotten that Ghislaine Maxwell was a regular visitor to the house and was not only just a ‘friend’ of ‘Fergie,’ but also allegedly a lover of not only Jeffrey Epstein but also the Duke of York supposedly also. The web of deceit and deviousness that has for too long invaded this 10-bedroomed, 30-room house must finally be banished to the past.
    Bell
    Mocked universally, this pair of bellends should finally be sent to social Siberia. King Charles III and his son clearly are on the right track and do not need this pair of toerags, and also the Duke and Duchess of Sussex in addition, causing yet further havoc for the rest of their family. Get them gone.
    Fergie Venice Stroll wedding
    Elsewhere yesterday, it was revealed Sarah, Duchess of York was in Venice, Italy “with at least three suitcases in tow” attending the wedding of the Canadian billionaire owner of Aston Martin Lawrence Stroll’s daughter Chloe to an Olmpian named Scotty James. In spite of her likely being made ‘homeless’ soon, it seems as if “life ain’t hard” for a woman who has still failed to answer the question: “Did you ever repay the loans and other benefits from the at-the-time-you-took-them criminal sex abuser Jeffrey Epstein?”
  • “Easy Mark” Randy Andy – Jeffrey Epstein Used The “Dim” Duke Of York As “His Front Man” In “Deals With Often Very Shady Players”

    “Easy Mark” Randy Andy – Jeffrey Epstein Used The “Dim” Duke Of York As “His Front Man” In “Deals With Often Very Shady Players”

    Royal author Tina Brown suggests “dim” Prince Andrew was just considered an “easy mark” by paedophile Jeffrey Epstein whilst condemnation of the mocked-up “bathtub bonk” by Ian Maxwell widens

    Yesterday the Express’s Sophie McCabe revisited the relationship between Prince Andrew and his late “bestie,” the since croaked paedophile Jeffrey Epstein.

     

    Examining comments by The Diana Chronicles author and former Vanity Fair editor Tina Brown (also known as Lady Evans CBE), McCabe stated:

     

    “Prince Andrew was first introduced to Jeffrey Epstein in 1999 by his friend and now-convicted sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell. The Duke of York went on vacations with both Epstein and Maxwell, invited them to royal residences and visited the disgraced financier on his private island. According to royal author and expert Tina Brown, the prince was an ‘easy mark’ for Epstein.”

     

    “Ms Brown, the creator of The Daily Beast, met Epstein in the Noughties. When her publication was about to publish the first of what would be six detailed investigative reports exposing his role in sex-trafficking young girls, he unexpectedly turned up at her office.”

     

    “In her book, The Palace Papers, she describes Epstein as ‘snake-eyed and terse,’ adding: ‘There was a morose, menacing air to him that I found sinister.’”

     

    “She also revealed that Epstein referred to Andrew as his “useful idiot” and described the characteristics that made the late Queen Elizabeth II’s second son an ‘easy mark for con artists and crooks.’”

     

    “Ms Brown claimed: ‘Andrew, unfortunately, exhibited classic symptoms of what is scientifically recognized as the Dunning-Kruger effect, the cognitive bias in which people come to believe that they are smarter and more capable than they really are.’”

     

    “‘The combination of minimal self-awareness and dim intellectual wattage leads sufferers of this condition to overestimate their capabilities. Years of enjoying unearned obeisance to his royal position allowed Andrew to bang on with a combination of overweening self-confidence and unchallenged ignorance. It made him an easy mark for con artists and crooks,’ she continued.”

     

    “According to Ms Brown’s unnamed source, Epstein flew Andrew on his corporate jet to places where he wanted to negotiate deals, knowing their governments were obliged to receive the British Prince. The financier would use Andrew as ‘his front man negotiated deals with often shady players.’ Ms Brown claimed Epstein would ‘give Andrew some cream off the cake.’”

     

    Now, in a month when the possibly as high as £9.7 million ($12 million, €11 million or درهم44.1 million) mutually agreed non-disclosure agreement reached by the equally birdbrained bagger of freebies Sarah, Duchess of York’s live-in ex-husband with Virginia Roberts comes to an end, the woes for this non-sweater are definitely worsening.

     

    Though he might have possibly even have encouraged Ian Maxwell to release to The Daily Telegraph what was subsequently mocked as “the most peculiar photograph seen on a front page,” the Duke of York simply looks more and more ridiculous.

     

    Of the snap of two random people with their faces covered with A4 printouts of photographs of Roberts Giuffre and Prince Andrew in the infamous bath where they were alleged to have begun their sexual shenanigans on 10th March 2001, Good Morning Britain host Susanna Reid on Monday observed:

     

    “It shows two people in the very bath in Ghislaine Maxwell’s former Belgravia home where the Duke of York was alleged to have abused Virginia Guiffre.”

     

    “Ghislaine Maxwell’s brother believes that it discredits Virginia Guiffre’s claims. It’s very odd, because Virginia Guiffre says that they were in the bath together.

     

    “This setup, this mockup, that the two people have done wearing masks, which is supposed to recreate that they were in the bath together – I have no idea what it recreates other than it’s clearly a bath big enough for two people to be in.”

     

    “In what sense it discredits Virginia Giuffre – I think most people looking at it would be at a complete loss.”

     

    Giving his tuppence worth, Reid’s co-host Richard Madeley added:

     

    “If you’re going to say the bath is too small for two people to sit in it, then you have a photograph presumably that demonstrates you can only get one person in it. To say this bath is too small and to prove that with a picture of two people in the bath, it seems to me bonkers. It just makes no sense at all.”

     

    Elsewhere in an “exclusive” on Sunday, Mirror news reporter Patrick Hill interviewed US attorney Spencer Kuvin, who represents nine of Jeffrey Epstein’s many, many victims about the Maxwell mockup. He shared that he thinks “the prince’s advisers are part of the PR plot” and observed:

     

    “It’s absurd. They seem to be saying Virginia was in the house after all. It undermines their case.”

     

    “As for Ghislaine’s comments about the genuine photo of Andrew with Virginia at her home in London, it shows a lot of work is being done on his behalf – he’s desperate to rehabilitate his image.”

     

    “Ghislaine protects the men in her life. She’s hoping Andrew can help her.”

     

    “There’s a PR campaign at work. It’s a public relations exercise, not so much a legal one. I think he and his lawyers have realised they have an impossible hill to climb.”

     

    “But he has nothing to lose by saying he wants to do it. He wins from declaring he’s innocent and should be let back into the royal family, but it’s never going to happen.”

     

    “It is unbelievable he’d try to reverse the agreement. If he starts down that route it’ll reopen the entire case.”

     

    Editor’s Note – Unlike as is the case in many publications, this article was NOT sponsored or supported by a third-party.

     

    THAT 2001 Photo Thus Far NOT PROVEN A FAKE – The 10th March 2001 photograph of Prince Andrew, Virginia Roberts and Ghislaine Maxwell

    The photograph, taken supposedly by Jeffrey Epstein on the first-floor landing at 44 Kinnerton Street, Belgravia, London, SW1X 8ES, United Kingdom, has been shared by the world’s media in hundreds of thousands of articles and analysed countless times by countless experts.

     

    In November 2019, the Daily Mail’s Inderdeep Bains called it: “The photograph that WON’T go away” and it, as of date, has NEVER been discredited. Amongst evidence suggesting it to be perfectly real is that:

     

    • The setting of the photograph has been confirmed as genuine by the Maxwell family. Of it, in March 2021, Ian Maxwell told Radio 4’s Today programme: “I do recognise that setting.”
    • The window in the picture has the same features as the front first floor windows of 44 Kinnerton Street.
    • The width of the first floor landing is accurate to the measurements shown in the floor plan of the sales brochure prepared on the 14th October 2021 by estate agents Wellbelove Quested.
    • Though he claimed to be “at a loss to explain this particular photograph” during the 2019 BBC interview, the Duke of York has admitted to having visited 44 Kinnerton Street. He stated: “I don’t think I think ever went upstairs… The dining room and everything was on the ground floor.” Contradicting the royal, sources have claimed that the room behind him, Roberts and Maxwell in the photograph was used as a sitting room.
    • The heights of all three individuals in the picture look to be accurate proportionately.
    • Prince Andrew’s “chubby fingers” are clear to see. The Queen’s second son’s fingers are clearly “chubby fingers” and these very same “chubby fingers” have been seen hundreds of thousands of times in hundreds of thousands of other photographs.
    • Prince Andrew has claimed he only ever goes out in London in a suit and tie. Images of him in open necked shirts in the capital – including one of him leaving the nightclub Chinawhite – prove to the contrary.
    • Prince Andrew has claimed he does not “do” hugs and and embraces in photographs. Images of him taken in St Tropez embracing the US socialite Chris Von Aspen in July 2007 suggest the alleged non-sweater is wrong also on that score.
    • The outfit worn by Virginia Roberts – a woman who has already received financial settlements from Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell – has been seen on her in photographs of her at Naomi Campbell’s 2001 birthday party in France. In spite of some suggestions that a lady only wears an outfit once, we counter that a lady in Miss Roberts’ unfortunate situation would be forced to wear what she was told appealed to those in control of her wished her to wear.
    • Matthew Steeples of The Steeple Times and Shaun Attwood of Shaun Attwood’s True Crime Channel have both seen inside 44 Kinnerton Street and the stair rail shown in the photo remains in place and is thus genuine to the setting. Attwood subsequently released film footage of this on his YouTube channel and The Steeple Times shared its most recent image of the open front door with the stair rail beyond in July 2021.
    • Many experts have repeatedly stated photo manipulation was in its infancy at the time that this image first surfaced.
    • The FBI have never questioned the authenticity of the image.

     

    Ghislaine-Maxwell-44-Kinnerton-Street-bathtub
    When asked about what occurred on the night of 10th March 2001 in the first floor bathroom at her Kinnerton Street mews house, Ghislaine Maxwell responded: “[Virginia Roberts] then characterized [sic] things took place in my bathroom in the bathtub itself. The tub is too small for any kind of activity whatsoever.” The picture of that very same tub used in marketing material by Wellbelove Quested proves exactly to the contrary.
    Ghislaine-Maxwell-44-Kinnerton-Street-layout-1
    The floor plan shared by the likes ‘The Daily Mail’ and ‘The Sun suggested the first-floor bathroom at the house to be 7-foot, 4 inches by 7-foot, 2-inches. Floor plans shared by estate agents Wellboved Quested suggested that the room is actually 8-foot, 4-inches by 8-foot, 2-inches. There was most definitely plenty of room for two…
    44-Kinnerton-Street-floorplan
    A floorplan of 44 Kinnerton Street, Belgravia. In it, mucky madam Ghislaine Maxwell’s home is clearly shown to be a place where ‘public’ entertaining took place on the ground floor, whilst ‘extracurricular’ activities took place on the upper two floors.
    44-Kinnerton-Street-banister
    These photographs of 44 Kinnerton Street, taken in July 2021, provide proof that the bannisters seen in the March 2001 photographs remain inside said property. The setting in which Prince Andrew and Virginia Roberts were captured was indeed most definitely genuine. In the same month, the new owners of the property displayed a poster at 44 Kinnerton Street for a festival that was to be held in East Anglia from 31st July 2021 to 1st August 2021. The event, the EA Festival, was hosted at Hedingham Castle – home to Jason and Demetra Lindsay – in Essex and had a line-up that included model and advocate Arizona Muse, film director Mike Figgis, ‘Countdown’s’ Susie Dent, sex commentator Rowan Pelling and comedian Josh Berry. The same open doorway also showed something else… The very same bannister that was shown in the photograph Prince Andrew, Virginia Robert and Ghislaine Maxwell appeared in.
  • Suspended Sommers Speaks – Kirby Sommers To Speak About Twitter Suspension Just As Fergie’s ‘Toesucker’ Blabs Also

    Suspended Sommers Speaks – Kirby Sommers To Speak About Twitter Suspension Just As Fergie’s ‘Toesucker’ Blabs Also

    ‘The Steeple Times’ urges readers to tune in to the listen to the crusading author of ‘Ghislaine Maxwell: An Unauthorized Biography’ Kirby Sommers speak about her suspension from Twitter just as Jeffrey Epstein associate Donald Trump is allowed to return and John Bryan blabs about ‘Randy Andy’s’ disastrous interview

    Just as the overtly over-opinionated onetime friend of Ghislaine Maxwell that is Donald Trump has been allowed to return to Twitter (though he supposedly has no intention of actually doing such), the crusading author of Ghislaine Maxwell: An Unauthorized Biography Kirby Sommers has ludicrously been suspended by the medium now owned by Elon Musk – a man once snapped with the aforementioned daughter of the poisonous pension pot plunderer Robert Maxwell.

     

    A truly tenacious lady who has delved deeper into the sordid saga relating to the mucky madam Maxwell than most, Sommers, however, will not be silenced. This morning, she announced that she will go live on YouTube at 12 noon GMT (7am Eastern Time) to share her thoughts about this development and the reasons behind it.

     

    In an email missive to The Steeple Times, Sommers – who has quite rightly called out associates of the croaked paedophile Jeffrey Epstein including Prince Andrew and Bill Clinton also – shared:

     

    “As you probably know, I took a short hiatus and was planning to get back to tweeting after the Thanksgiving holiday in the U.S.”

     

    “I will be uploading a podcast at 7am Eastern Time on my YouTube channel to tell my followers how and where to find me.”

     

    “It’s clear that my research upset many of the people in the trafficking ring connected to Epstein/Maxwell. Seems so many are connected. Even Rudy Giuliani who was the Mayor of New York.”

     

    “I’ve done a bit of investigating and it appears that my suspension is due to Prince Andrew and Meghan Markle’s people. Seems they didn’t appreciate being exposed as possibly having a liaison before Markle married Andrew’s nephew, Harry.”

     

    “If you would be kind enough to tell our mutual followers that my account was suddenly suspended, but that I will be making an announcement at 7am. Eastern Time it would be greatly appreciated.”

     

    To watch the broadcast, click here.

     

    To purchase a copy of ‘Ghislaine Maxwell: An Unauthorized Biography’ by Kirby Sommers, click here.

     

    Editor’s Note – Unlike as is the case in many publications, this article was NOT sponsored or supported by a third-party.

     

    Editor’s Update (Tuesday 22nd November 2022) – All further comments will now not be published relating to this article due to persistent trolling from both those supportive of Kirby Sommers and those anti.

     

    Pictured Top – Noxious nonce and now convicted sex offender Ghislaine Maxwell with Twitter’s new owner Elon Musk in a photograph in which he claimed she “photobombed” him (left); the cover of the book about the daughter of the ‘Bouncing Czech’s’ deviant daughter by Kirby Sommers (right).

     

    Kirby Sommers Twitter suspension
    Kirby Sommers may have been suspended from Twitter, but thankfully she wasn’t banned and we are sure she will be back.
    John Bryan toesucker Sarah Duchess of York
    The ‘Toesucker’ Turns – In other news this morning, “roguish” John Bryan – the man who will forever be associated with being snapped sucking the toes of Sarah, Duchess of York in August 1992 – gave a “world exclusive” to ‘The Mail on Sunday’ and “broke a 30-year silence to talk about the infamous incident” whilst “the duchess last night declined to comment.” Turning to Jeffrey Epstein, Bryan claimed he “was ‘stunned’ to be invited back into the Royal fold in November 2019” to give Prince Andrew “honest advice” after his disastrous ‘Newsnight’ interview. He shamelessly bragged: “Sarah asked me to come and help Andrew and the girls. I’d stayed friends with Sarah, but when everything was going down, when it was bad, she reached out to me and I was happy to help.”
    Jeffrey Epstein Prince Andrew
    Documents related to the associates of the croaked paedophile Jeffrey Epstein will now be unsealed after Judge Loretta Preska decided on Friday that “public interest outweighed the privacy rights of the eight ‘John Does’ named in the documents.” One of the eight individuals is Tom Pritzker, the billionaire executive chairman of Hyatt Hotels, and another is Emmy Tayler, the former personal assistant to Ghislaine Maxwell.
    Sarah Duchess of York Instagram
    Bizarrely on Instagram, in recent days, Sarah, Duchess of York was herself rather cryptic in what she decided to share with her 426,000 followers. The definite dimwit declared: “I have stepped boldly into a new chapter of my life, which I am so excited to share with you” in one post before adding: “Thinking about my next move” in another. Clearly, aside from slamming down a reported £7 million on a Belgravia mews house – the funding of which remains curiously unexplained – this somewhat stupid woman remains utterly infatuated with the ex-husband she also weirdly still lives with at Royal Lodge, Windsor.
  • Wally of the Week – The Rt. Hon. Liz Truss MP

    Wally of the Week – The Rt. Hon. Liz Truss MP

    That Liz Truss appointed an adviser who’d previously worked for the mate of paedophiles Prince Andrew sums up her complete lack of sense and good judgment; that she’s almost unpopular as the rotten ratbag royal is also telling

    George Canning lasted just 119 days in office from 12th April 1827 until his death on 8th August that year and now Liz Truss needs to ‘survive’ until 3rd January 2023 if she isn’t to replace him as the shortest serving Prime Minister in British history. Frankly, her chances of that seem a little bit beyond ‘Slim Shady.’

     

    Truss – a schoolgirl-like being akin to a cross between the lisping limpet Violet Elizabeth Bott and the hectoring harridan with a mission to make the nation fat that is Mary Berry – faces woes on all fronts. However, what was most telling was that her adviser Jason Stein, who was forced out yesterday, had previously been an adviser to the man who paid a sum commonly purported to be £12 million to a woman he claimed to have never met, the non-sweaty friend of paedophiles Prince Andrew.

     

    A clear case of “the truth being stranger than fiction,” the choices of Truss – a woman whose own lack of loyalty was illustrated most clearly when she had an affair with the now former MP Mark Field in 2006 – in also both her also-now-gone Chancellor and Home Secretary are most definitely indicative of someone who simply doesn’t have her finger on the pulse in any regard.

     

    Elsewhere yesterday, the booze loving Felicity ‘Call Me Flicka’ Buchan, was called out by the acidicly acerbic blog From The Hornets Nest for being a “rare voice of support” for Ms Truss. Quoting an article from The Times, the blog observed that the Kensington MP was “out on a limb in supporting [the] hapless” Prime Minister and claimed it was “as if Truss was working for the Labour Party” and “was unfit for purpose.”

     

    Going further, it was observed of a meeting of the One Nation Group:

     

    “One obsequious murmur came from the minister Felicity Buchan, who offered a rare voice of support. But otherwise, the MPs filtered out of the room, and to their various disconsolate dinners, in a state of open hopelessness. ‘It was 99 per cent unsympathetic, 1 per cent Felicity Buchan,’ one said.”

     

    Update – 2pm, 20th October – ‘Slim Shady’ Liz Truss proved to come and go even quicker than expected and now the shortest serving PM in British history has gone after just 44 days in office; God only knows what calamity comes next.

     

    Pictured top – Two of the most unpopular people in Britain right now, Liz Truss and the Duke of York. What a pair of berks!

     

    Mark Field strangler
    The former lover of Liz Truss, the now ex-MP Mark Field, came under fire in June 2019 after he grabbed a female protester by the neck at a bankers’ banquet. He was subsequently suspended from his Foreign Office position for manhandling Greenpeace activist Janet Barker. Rabbit loving farm dweller Ms Barker, 38, subsequently suggested Field “should consider anger management lessons” but did not comment on what she thought of the then Westminster MP’s sexual antics with the now (for the moment) Prime Minister he had enjoyed intimate relations with.
    Prime Minister
    Once lauded as ‘Lioness Liz,’ but now more widely considered to be ‘Loopy Liz’ and ‘Ludicrous Liz,’ here is a Prime Minister who is nothing but an international laughing stock. King Charles rightly muttered “oh dear, you’re back again” on encountering her recently and soon she’ll no doubt be consigned to where all political careers inevitably end – the dustbin of failures. Poor, laughable lassy Liz Truss.
    George Canning
    Will the current Prime Minister beat George Canning in having a record for being the shortest-lived Prime Minister in office? Given her current predicament, she looks most likely to be the ultimate winner.
    Felicity Buchan booze
    When you’ve got the backing of the current MP for Kensington – who won by just 150 votes at the last general election– you know you’re onto a loser. Boozed-up Felicity Buchan – a woman who has failed to reply to a letter sent to her by her constituent Matthew Steeples in July 2022 – is someone no one in their right-mind would want the backing of. Lazy and ludicrous, here is someone who can’t even deal with the potholes in Walton Street, the very street she lives in in Knightsbridge let alone judge the mood of the nation.
  • Ghislaine’s Deviancy – New Allegations Against Ghislaine Maxwell

    Ghislaine’s Deviancy – New Allegations Against Ghislaine Maxwell

    As new theories about Elon Musk and Ghislaine Maxwell’s connections emerge, further new stories about the grubby groper’s deviancy follow involving Donald Trump and a Scottish madam

    Like the case of the boy who repeatedly cried wolf, grubby groper Ghislaine Maxwell is someone whose word simply cannot be trusted.

     

    Now, as she experiences the realities of her 20-year prison term, maybe, just maybe this wicked wench might name names before a June 2023 deadline if she wants to see her sentence reduced – and now, also, it seems powerful people are starting to get worried.

     

    Yesterday, the jailed sex trafficker and mucky madam Miss Maxwell – AKA Mrs Scott Borgerson, ‘Jennifer Ellmax,’ ‘Jen Marshall,’ ‘Janet Marshall’ and just plain old ‘G’ – returned to the news when the Mirror’s United States editor Christopher Bucktin revealed that she supposedly “asked the Elon Musk to ‘destroy the Internet’ before [appearing with him in a now] notorious party photo.”

     

    Taken in 2014 at a Vanity Fair party, the aforementioned snap of the billionaire Tesla CEO being, as he has claimed on Twitter, “photo-bombed” by the since disgraced pension pot plunderer’s daughter, it “has [also] been claimed,” captured a moment witnessed by an unnamed Vanity Fair employee.

     

    Of it, this ‘source’ told the New York Times: “The pair chatted. Ms Maxwell asked if Mr Musk if there were a way to remove oneself from the Internet and encouraged Mr Musk to destroy [it].”

     

    Continuing, Bucktin added that this unnamed magazine worker claimed that “Maxwell also allegedly asked why aliens had yet to make contact with humans.”

     

    The source curiously claimed: “Musk replied that all civilisations eventually end – including Maxwell’s hypothetical alien one – and raised the possibility that humans are living in a simulation.”

     

    Previously Musk has stated “don’t know [her] at all” of Jeffrey Epstein’s hideous henchwoman, whilst earlier this month The Guardian reported that a new book has suggested that Donald Trump has been doing his best to distance himself from the deviancy of his former friend.

     

    According to the paper, author of Confidence Man: The Making of Donald Trump and the Breaking of America Maggie Haberman suggests that Trump asked campaign advisers at a meeting in July 2020 in the Oval Office: “You see that article in the [New York] Post today that mention me… She [GM] say anything about me?”

     

    The paper’s Page Six story concerned quoted Steven Hoffenberg, the since deceased convicted Ponzi scheming mentor of Epstein, as saying: “Ghislaine thought she was untouchable – that she’d be protected by the intelligence communities she and Jeffrey helped with information: the Israeli intelligence services, and Les Wexner, who has given millions to Israel; by Prince Andrew, President Clinton and even by President Trump, who was well-known to be an acquaintance of her and Epstein’s.”

     

    Elsewhere in other news, a Scottish madam has claimed she once received a call from Ghislaine Maxwell, but “refused to provide women for Jeffrey Epstein” according to the Daily Record.

     

    Anna Gristina, from Kirkliston, West Lothian – who herself spent four months on remand at the Rikers Island prison in New York in 2012 for her involvement in a £6 million vice ring – told Radar Online “she ran a legitimate matchmaking service” and stated: “[Maxwell] called up from London to say she had a gentleman friend in Florida who likes company, but he likes younger girls and she heard I was very reputable and had the best models in the industry.”

     

    She added: “”I was at a hockey game with my kids when the call came in. Afterward, I did a little digging and my friend told me to stay away. If I had known more at the time I would have turned him in.”

     

    The fake and staged photographs associated with the mucky madam and her cohort Jeffrey Epstein

    • 10th August 2022 – Fox News air a photoshopped image of Judge Bruce Reinhart sitting on a private plane with Ghislaine Maxwell. The original image had featured Jeffrey Epstein and had been doctored after Reinhart signed the arrant on the search of Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate. Fox host Brian Kilmeade later tweeted: “This depiction never took place and we wanted to make clear that we were showing a meme in jest.”
    • 29th April 2021 – Lawyers for Maxwell issue an image of her purportedly which they claimed to be her with a black eye. It turned out that the wicked wench had simply had an eye infection.
    • 12th August 2019 – Pictured at an In-N-Out burger diner in Los Angeles, California in a clearly doctored shot. Photo of of the ‘Bouncing Czech’s’ deviant daughter taken allegedly by Leah Saffian.
    • 5th December 2010 – Jeffrey Epstein and Prince Andrew walking in New York. Of this the journalist who tracked the pair down with photographer Jae Donnelly, Annette Witheridge, told the Mirror: “My theory is Epstein wanted to be pictured. Why go out in the bitter cold for a quick walk around Central Park? I think Epstein was relying on the fact a photographer was outside. He would’ve known we were there, we weren’t trying to hide. He had been in prison and he wanted to rehabilitate his reputation. Who better to be seen with than the Queen’s son? He was saying to the world that Prince Andrew is my friend.”
    • 10th March 2001 – Forever world-famous photo that cost Prince Andrew a payment of circa £12 million to a woman, Virginia Roberts Giuffre, he claimed never to have met taken at Miss Maxwell’s Kinnerton Street, Belgravia mews house. This infamous image has never been discredited in spite of claims from Prince Andrew and others.

     

    44 Kinnerton Street
    This anything but fake photograph of “chubby fingered” Prince Andrew, Virginia Roberts and Ghislaine Maxwell on the first-floor landing of 44 Kinnerton Street, Belgravia, London, SW1X 8ES on 10th March 2001 quite rightly remains in the public domain in spite of the royal and others such as Lady Victoria Hervey claiming it to have been a doctored creation.
    Prince Andrew Jeffrey Epstein 2010 park walk
    A walk in New York’s Central Park in December 2010 in matching jackets illustrated the deviancy of Jeffrey Epstein; the by then convicted paedophile clearly wanted to be snapped with a royal as he sought to attempt to restore his reputation – a ‘quality’ clearly shared by his former lover and the woman he most likely funneled dirty stolen pension pot money for.
    Fake In-N-Out photo 2019
    Prior to her arrest at the curiously named ‘Tucked Away’ using the invented name ‘Jen Marshall’ or Janet Marshall,’ woman-of-multiple identities Ghislaine Maxwell’s associates allegedly released faked images of her at an In-N-Out restaurant in August 2019. The advert in the background at the bus stop had never been at that location.
    Fake black eye photo
    Another example of deviancy came about when the mucky madam’s then lawyers tried to make out their client was being abused in jail and released a picture of her with what they claimed to be a black eye. It was simply an eye infection and now they’re probably regretting helping her as she’s not even paid their bills.
    Fake plane photo
    That Fox News thought it funny to share a faked picture of a judge with connections to both the cases of Trump and Epstein with Maxwell was a further curious example of deviancy at work in this sordid saga.
    With Donald and Melania Trump
    Trump and Maxwell’s history goes back decades. He clearly sent her a message with his “I wish her well, whatever that may mean” message when asked about her during his presidential term.

    Names in the firing line most obvious from Ghislaine’s filthy ‘Little Black Book’ as she seeks to minimise her sentence

    Ghislaine Maxwell has until June 2023 to cooperate and thus “name names” if she wishes to see her sentence reduced.

     

    Those Scott Borgerson’s estranged wife has been known to associate with – none of whom The Steeple Times is suggesting at this time as having been involved in any of her crimes, but whom she might seek revenge against for not offering her what she might consider enough public or even private support – include:

     

    • Alexander Acosta
    • Woody Allen
    • Ehud Barak
    • Tom Barrack
    • Scott Borgerson (estranged husband, facing legal woes in connections with the non-payment of his wife’s vast legal bills)
    • Jean-Luc Brunel (deceased)
    • Naomi Campbell
    • President Bill Clinton and his wife Hillary
    • Alan Dershowitz
    • Glenn Dubin and his wife Eva
    • Bernie Ecclestone
    • Bill Gates
    • Geordie Greig
    • Countess of Iveagh (AKA Clare Guinness, Clare Hazell)
    • Lord Mandelson
    • Marvin Minsky
    • George J. Mitchell
    • Rupert Murdoch
    • Elon Musk
    • Peter Nygård
    • Bill Richardson III
    • Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman
    • Kevin Spacey (who is currently involved in a civil sexual assault trial himself)
    • Jes Staley
    • Ken Starr
    • President Donald Trump and his potentially trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein wife Melania
    • Ivana Trump (deceased)
    • Chris Tucker
    • Harvey Weinstein
    • Leslie Wexner
    • Prince Andrew, Duke of York and his live-in ex-wife Sarah, Duchess of York

     

  • Arresting Andy – More Woes For Deplorable Duke Of York

    Arresting Andy – More Woes For Deplorable Duke Of York

    It looks as if there might be more woes to come for Prince Andrew as Ghislaine Maxwell is given until June 2023 to dob those she sex trafficked to in; the FBI should get ready to do some arresting

    Whilst the Daily Mail’s Ephraim Hardcastle effectively somewhat ludicrously suggested on Thursday that there might be a way back for Prince Andrew or at the least the saving of his HRH title because of his daughter’s “virtues,” the DailyMail.com’s Harriet Alexander and Jamie Phillips were quite contradictory in arguing: “This isn’t the end of the story” for him in a separate article.

     

    With Ghislaine Maxwell given until June 2023 to cooperate with authorities over naming which famous faces she and Epstein actually sex trafficked her victims to, now comes the possibility that the royal’s mucky madam mate may be amongst others to get a visit from the rozzers.

     

    In July we reported Spencer Kuvin, a lawyer for several of the Epstein and Maxwell victims, telling the Mirror that the non-sweating favourite child of the late Queen would be “one of the targets” of the FBI for potential prosecution in the wake of Maxwell’s sentencing, he went further this week and claimed: “She really holds all the secrets.”

     

    Bashed yet again in a new documentary titled Prince Andrew: Banished, the bestie of currently on trial for fraud Bernie Ecclestone was also slammed as an “idiot” and a “spoiled brat.” Amongst other comments made of him were that he was a “narcissist” and “there’s always onerunt of the litter, and Andrew was it… Couldn’t keep his trousers closed.”

     

    In the programme, of a braggart and bully who paid circa £12 million to a woman he claimed never to have met, ex-press secretary Dickie Arbiter shared: “The problem is, the man’s an idiot” whilst ‘royal author’ Phil Dampier added: “His one big thing is sex.”

     

    Going further, of why King Charles’s much loathed brother chose to associate with Epstein, Kirwan-Taylor suggested: “The moment he met Epstein, Andrew said hurrah… Because Epstein was every dodgy businessman or sheikh that Andrew had ever wanted” whilst former Vanity Fair editor Tina Brown pointedly added:

     

    “The other great glue between them was Andrew’s sex life… Epstein was very good at making him feel like he was incredibly important… For Andrew it was heaven [being with Epstein in New Mexico, New York and Palm Beach). He could behave as he liked behind closed doors… His decision to do that interview [with the BBC’s Newsnight] was the most unbelievable act of self-destruction… Andrew strapped on a suicide vest.”

     

    It is now time for the sidekick of the help-herself-to-anything-that-is-not-pinned-down grifter Sarah, Duchess of York to do the decent thing. It is time for this international embarrassment to fly to America and it is time for him to tell the truth what he knows about his chums – including also Bill Clinton, Kevin Spacey and Donald Trump – to the FBI. Given his previous form, we all know that of course he won’t.

     

    Central Park 2010
    Arresting Andy – That neither Prince Andrew nor Jeffrey Epstein supposedly ever smoked, drank alcohol or took drugs is one thing, that they wore matching coats is another (as pictured when they walked in Central Park, New York in 2010); now, though, it seems the randy royal may face have to deal with more serious woes caused by his similarities of character to the croaked paedophile.
    Waving
    The Duke of York was rightly included in the funeral of his majestic mother, though also rightly not in a prominent manner. That he was snapped waving at photographers and public as if he was Kim Kardashian or Paris Hilton, however, was indicative that this the rotten ratbag is just as arrogant as he has always been. He should now not be seen and most certainly not heard.
    Arresting Andy – In February 2020, ‘The Steeple Times’ reported on croaked paedophile Jeffrey Epstein’s chum (and his wife Sarah, Duchess of York’s financial sponsor) Prince Andrew having alleged fraudster Bernie Ecclestone – who is currently on trial for allegedly trying to hide £400 million in assets from HMRC – over to Royal Lodge, Windsor to celebrate his birthday. Whether this man “with qualities that would make Leona Helmsley look generous” brought Sloppy Giuseppes from Pizza Express (Woking branch) for the bash remains still unknown. It is clear that the duke’s choices of friends, amongst them also despots and those of questionable financial means, remains as questionable as his arrogant behaviour to those he views to be beneath him.
    Whilst Lady Victoria Hervey may peddle her belief that the photograph taken of Prince Andrew, the then Virginia Roberts and Ghislaine Maxwell at 44 Kinnerton Street, Belgravia, London, SW1 on the evening of the 10th March 2001 is a fake, others including the photographer who photographed the original photograph in 2011, New Zealander Michael Thomas, takes an entirely different view. Speaking to the ‘New Zealand Herald’ in February, Thomas remarked: “As I have said before, it was just an ordinary photo you would have got from a chemist in the days of negatives. Surely, if it was fake, every media outlet in the world would be getting sued for using it. The fact that isn’t happening, to me says everything.” Of the image, previously in 2019, Thomas commented: “It wasn’t like she pulled the photo of Prince Andrew out, it was just in among the rest of them. They were just typical teenage snaps. There’s no way that photo is fake.”
    Spencer Kuvin
    Lawyer Spencer Kuvin has claimed that the FBI will be going after the Duke of York and others over their links to Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. It seems unlikely that any charges will be brought against the rotten royal, but others might well get thrown under the bus including Woody Allen, Bill Clinton, Alan Dershowitz, Kevin Spacey, Donald Trump and Leslie Wexner.
  • Mind-Blowing, Moaning, Money Motivated Meghan Markle… Or Just A Predictably Petulant Princess?

    Mind-Blowing, Moaning, Money Motivated Meghan Markle… Or Just A Predictably Petulant Princess?

    Is it that mind-blowing that the Duchess of Sussex thinks she’s helping her cause with her latest antics? Isn’t this just instead yet another predictable example of her showing her truly self-serving character?

    Deservedly condemned by Tom Bower in Revenge: Meghan, Harry and the war between the Windsors and hinted at as potentially a “yacht girl” for Prince Andrew by Kirby Sommers in July, the mendacious minx formerly known as Meghan Markle has very predictably scored multiple further own goals in recent days. Why, given her past form, anyone is surprised however is quite beyond comprehension.

     

    Aside from condescendingly comparing herself to Nelson Mandela – for which she unsurprisingly got slammed by the late South African president’s grandson Zwelivelile Mandela – the Duchess of Sussex was also called out as not having “an iota of common sense” by the New York Post’s Maureen Callahan.

     

    Going further, in an opinion piece widely saluted titled “Toddler and tiara: Meghan Markle STILL throwing tantrums about royal family,” Callahan added:

     

    “This woman has nothing to say. She has nothing to offer, no original thoughts or guiding philosophy, no earthly reason to be taking so much money from, and so much space in, the mainstream media she so clearly despises.”

     

    Summing her up as “the Greta Garbo of Montecito,” a new “Queen of All Things Sufferable” and “the Petulant Princess,” the award winning “Top 50 Power Women 2016” journalist amongst other things suggested:

     

    “I must concede her lone accomplishment here: Just when you think Meghan Markle can’t get any more delusional, she outdoes herself. Her self-regard runs in direct opposition to her waning relevance. She clearly has no real friends left — or even decent publicists… Meghan is an inveterate liar.”

     

    “What will make Meghan happy? Hell if she knows. The only solace she finds from this existential torment, it seems, is sitting for fancy photo shoots and talking to friendly journalists.”

     

    “Left to her own devices here, Meghan returns to her default mode, perseverating over the Queen’s refusal to give her and Harry everything they wanted: namely, to monetize [sic] their royal status while owing nothing in public service.”

     

    “’I think forgiveness is really important,’ Meghan says, adding that she has ‘a lot to say until I don’t. Sometimes, as they say, the silent part is still part of the song.’ Meghan Markle, two very weary nations beg you: Please. Be that silent part.”

     

    Though outrage at the conduct of the Duchess of Sussex and ultimately also her drip of a husband towards the Queen and other members of both the House of Windsor and her own birth family is understandable, this ridiculous woman is simply incapable of accepting that it is her that is at fault. It seems that ambitious and audacious ‘MeGain’ will stop at nothing to achieve her next goal – the keys to the White House.

     

    Banana
    Known for slipping on proverbial bananas – as well as writing patronising messages on them to prostitutes – the wife of Prince Charles’s second son is clearly on a path where she will create more embarrassment and bring yet more havoc to both her marital and birth families. It is an outrage that nobody urges her to see sense and teaches her to behave with a modicum of decorum and an ounce of decency.
    Here is a woman who won’t stop until she next seizes high office. It is clear that a political career is very much on the agenda of this self-obsessed ex-D-list actress.

    Can anyone solve a problem like ‘Mind-Blowing MeGain’?

    • In November 2021, the duchess was forced to apologise to the Appeal Court in London for making a misleading statement in her privacy case against The Mail on Sunday’s publishers.
    • Her very own father, Thomas, has called out her many untruths about him and others again, again and again.
    • Of her claiming having got married the day before she actually did, Mr Markle stated: “Lying about the archbishop? How can you say: ‘We’ve been married three days before we got married’? Her lies are so obvious, I don’t know why she says them.”
    • Her very own half-sister, Samantha, who is currently bringing a defamation case against her, has called her out as a liar on multiple occasions also. It has been proven that the duchess’s claim that she hasn’t seen her sibling in over 20 years was proven untrue when a photo of the pair 13 years ago emerged.
    • Her very own half-brother, Thomas Jr., said of her: “I told Prince Harry, I think she’s going to ruin your life. She’s very shallow… She’s a phony, a bully, a jaded, shallow, conceited woman.”
    • The former Meghan Markle has been called out on multiple occasions for spinning stories against other members of the royal family, most especially the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge.
    • Staff who’ve worked for her have complained that she is a bully and investigations into this remain ongoing.
    • The Duchess of Sussex is a known manipulator of the press and paparazzis and it has been claimed that she’ll “twist the truth” to get any headline she wants.
    • Questions remain as to how many times she’s actually been married in total. Some say twice, some say thrice.
    • “Would you trust this woman with a bargepole?” is something often asked of this money motivated minx.

     

    Twitter reacts to ‘MeGain’s’ latest antics…

    Tweet 5
    Tweet 3
    Tweet 2
    Tweet 1
  • Ghislaine Maxwell – Master Manipulator

    Ghislaine Maxwell – Master Manipulator

    Apple podcast featuring Matthew Steeples being interviewed by the Irish ‘Sunday World’s’ Nicola Tallant on her ‘Crime World’ channel about whether Ghislaine Maxwell was an innocent servant or a master manipulator goes live

    Earlier this week, after first meeting at CrimeCon UK in London in June 2022, The Steeple Times’ Matthew Steeples was invited onto the award-winning investigative journalist Nicola Tallant’s ‘Crime World’ podcast to discuss whether Ghislaine Maxwell should be considered as “Jeffrey Epstein’s innocent servant” or the reverse, his “master manipulator.”

     

    In a 37-minute interview with Tallant – who has been deservedly lauded for her investigations into Irish crimes for the Sunday World and Irish Daily Mirror – Steeples told of “his own views on Maxwell and how he believes she was the one who wore the trousers in the relationship with Epstein. We talk hidden cameras, a secret address book and a money trail right into the heart of their twisted world.”

     

    Commenting afterwards, Steeples remarked: “Nicola is clearly a lady with an ability to get to the heart of a story and I enjoyed chatting with her about how Ghislaine Maxwell was, in my humble opinion, actually the master in the relationship. She was, I would say, the controller and connector and Jeffrey Epstein was her money funnel.”

     

    “She was certainly a woman abused by her own father, but that doesn’t mean she should have gone on to abuse others and help others abuse others. As many comment on Twitter, she has been convicted of sex trafficking women but nobody has joined her yet who received those victims in being prosecuted. It is time that justice was served on her powerful associates – powerful associates who featured in the address book that was hers and hers long before she met the very man she now vilifies.”

     

    To listen to the ‘Crime World’ podcast on Apple, click here.

     

    Follow Nicola Tallant on Twitter at @CrimeNicola.

     

    Pictured top – Convicted sex offender and mucky madam Ghislaine Maxwell, renowned journalist Nicola Tallant and Matthew Steeples.

     

    Podcast
    Nicola Tallant has produced over 125 episodes of her ‘Crime World’ podcast series in conjunction with producer Ian Maleney.
    Jeffrey Epstein Ghislaine Maxwell
    On the show, which is the 126th edition of Tallant’s ‘Crime World’ series, Matthew Steeples discusses the power play between the croaked taxi driver turned conman turned paedophile Jeffrey Epstein and the incarcerated mucky madam sex offender Ghislaine Maxwell. He suggests the common belief that the former was in charge to be a misplaced conception and that the latter was the especially wicked power mistress. It was, after all, the contacts in her address book to whom their victims were supplied.
    Robert Maxwell
    Prior to moving to New York – supposedly penniless – after the death of her pension pot plundering father, ‘The Bouncing Czech’s’ favourite child considered him the most important man in her life. Once settled there, quite likely with the help of the Ponzi scheming paedophile Epstein, she turned him into a money funnel to draw out the £500 million stolen from the Mirror’s retired workers.
    House manual
    The house manual of Epstein’s Palm Beach residence clearly was written with the input of the clearly socially more adept Ghislaine Maxwell than the rougher Jeffrey Epstein. It is of the style of someone who grew up with privileges rather than someone from the wrong side of the tracks, but it also indicates how very controlling the former truly can be in her demands.
    Ghislaine Maxwell
    Here is an arrogant and entitled woman who used to have access to it all – be it power, parties, privileges, royalty, mansions, islands and yachts. She has now quite deservedly exchanged this for 20 years in a prison cell and also faces further legal suits and eternal shame and disgrace.
    116 East 65th Street, New York Sheldon Barr
    Earlier this month – just after her former home at 116 East 65th Street, New York was sold for £13.3 million ($16 million, €15.7 million or درهم58.8 million) by real estate investor Frederick Rudd and his wife Kim Greenberg on 20th May – it was revealed that the convicted mucky madam sex offender faces further woes relating to that property after an art dealer, Sheldon Barr (pictured), has filed a lawsuit against her claiming he suffered “life changing injuries” outside the property caused by her lack of maintenance in 2015. Maxwell sold the 7,000 square foot Lenox Hill townhouse for £12.5 million ($15 million, €14.7 million or درهم55.1 million) in 2015.
    TedTalk
    When Maxwell gave a speech about the oceans to TedX in Charlottesville, she was accompanied by the caption: “The ocean, the biggest threat.” It turns out that instead she was the biggest threat to young people and a liar and deceiver.
  • Gunning For Ghislaine 2022 – Search for gun continues in Maxwell jail

    Gunning For Ghislaine 2022 – Search for gun continues in Maxwell jail

    Authorities confirm to ‘The Steeple Times’ that search for smuggled gun at jail housing Ghislaine Maxwell and R. Kelly continues as mucky madam continues to bang on about her life being at risk

    Moaning menace Ghislaine Maxwell used to like shooting parties where she downed birds with Prince Andrew with a 12 bore. Instead now, this convicted sex offender has turned to banging on about how “her life has been threatened and death threats continue whilst she is incarcerated.”

     

    After the New York Post reported on Monday that officers had been “scouring the troubled lockup” where she is housed for a smuggled gun, her supporters raged that it is “outrageous that she is left at risk of being murdered.” For her, shotgun fun has been replaced by supposed real danger from illegal weaponry.

     

    Yesterday, The Steeple Times contacted representatives at the federal Bureau of Prisons about this development. They confirmed that the “search for a gun remains ongoing” at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Sunset Park, Brooklyn. The prison – which houses not only the pension pot plunder’s deviant daughter but also the “fallen R&B superstar” R. Kelly – had been alerted to the armament having been “introduced” to the facility on 7th June and yesterday shared: “It has yet to be found.”

     

    In the 77-page document submitted this week to the United States District Court Southern District of New York by attorneys for mucky madam Maxwell as they try to get her a laughable 4-year sentence on 28th June, they moaned about another “risk to her life”:

     

    “Just recently, Ms. Maxwell was the target of a credible death threat from a fellow inmate. On information and belief, one of the female inmates in Ms. Maxwell’s housing unit told at least three other inmates that she had been offered money to murder Ms. Maxwell and that she planned to strangle her in her sleep. The inmate who made the threat has been moved to the SHU, presumably to protect Ms. Maxwell.”

     

    “This incident reflects the brutal reality that there are numerous prison inmates who would not hesitate to kill Ms. Maxwell – whether for money, fame, or simple ‘street cred.’”

     

    “Ms. Maxwell has effectively traded the stress of flashlight checks every 15 minutes in the middle of the night while in isolation for the equivalent stress of having to sleep with one eye open – for as long as she is housed with other inmates.”

     

    “Ms. Maxwell will have live with this threat every day that she is housed in the MDC and every day that she is incarcerated in the prison where she is designated.

     

    Pathetically trying to justify why she went on the run during the summer of 2020, the mucky madam’s attorneys again returned to the theme of her being “at risk of being killed” and stated:

     

    “Ms. Maxwell was the target of numerous death threats and threats of violence and was being hunted by the press. One media outlet even offered a $10,000 bounty for information about her whereabouts.”

     

    “Tragically, this experience was not new for Ms. Maxwell. Decades earlier, when Ms. Maxwell was just a child and her father was a Member of Parliament, U.K. authorities found a ‘hit list’ of potential kidnapping/assassination targets in a safehouse used by the Irish Republican Army. Ms. Maxwell’s name was first on the list.”

     

    “This unnerving experience has haunted her, heightening her vigilance and concerns about the welfare and safety of her young stepchildren, who were being hounded by the media at school and at the beach; and her husband, who was besieged by media coverage and had lost his employment and professional relationships.”

     

    “Ms. Maxwell was also worried for herself, having legitimate reason to fear for her own life… Ms. Maxwell’s presence in New Hampshire was driven solely by the need to protect herself and her family from threats of physical harm and from the unprecedented and escalating press and public vilification she had to endure since Epstein’s death.”

     

    Whilst shooting parties necking sloe gin used to amongst her social pursuits, Ghislaine Maxwell will soon have to get used to threats against her as she sinks into life forever in the clink. This wicked woman chose to participate in sexual abuse and now as a convicted criminal, nobody in their right mind will feel sorry for her as she faces the grim perils of prison. Next!

     

    Pictured top – Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein at a shooting party hosted by Prince Andrew at Balmoral in Aberdeenshire in 1999 (left) and R. Kelly posing with people pointing guns at him in a music video (right).

     

    Metropolitan Detention Center
    The Metropolitan Detention Center at 80 29th Street, Brooklyn, New York houses 1,712 prisoners. It is an administrative facility that aside from Ghislaine Maxwell (prisoner 02879-509) and R. Kelly (prisoner 09627-035) currently houses amongst others the former President of Honduras Juan Orlando Hernández Alvarado (prisoner 91441-054) and the 2022 New York City subway attacker Frank James (prisoner 83999-053).
    Fellow convicted sex trafficker R. Kelly is in the facility alongside Jeffrey Epstein’s co-collaborator sex trafficker awaiting sentencing on 29th June 2022 for that and other crimes numbering racketeering, child sexual abuse, kidnapping and bribery. He was convicted in September 2021.
    Jeffrey Epstein Ghislaine Maxwell shooting party
    The days of living it up at shooting parties are numbered for the daughter of ‘The Bouncing Czech’ and her croaked paedophile lover.
    Elsewhere, for once in her otherwise anything but sorry for her windbag existence, Amanda Platell was spot on in her analysis. This morning, in her weekly ‘Daily Mail’ comment column, the apologist for her own paedophile mate, Rolf Harris, remarked: “Lawyers for Ghislaine Maxwell argue she should be spared a 20-year jail sentence for procuring young girls for Jeffrey Epstein and be given just four years as she was emotionally abused by her father, the corrupt media tycoon Robert Maxwell. She’s 60, for heaven’s sake. Too old to blame Daddy!”