The Steeple Times

Category: Liars

The Steeple Times calls out the Liars

  • “Stupid” Randy Andy – The No Longer Grand Old Duke of York

    “Stupid” Randy Andy – The No Longer Grand Old Duke of York

    After Jeffrey Epstein victims’ lawyer Brad Edwards labels Prince Andrew “stupid” at CrimeCon in Las Vegas, ‘The Steeple Times’s’ Matthew Steeples looks forward to discussing the ratbag royal and mucky madam Ghislaine Maxwell’s fate at CrimeCon London in June

    On Sunday, The Sun quoted Brad Edwards, Esq. – a crusading lawyer for 69 victims of the croaked paedophile Jeffrey Epstein and a founding partner of Fort Lauderdale, Florida based Edwards Pottinger LLC – as describing Prince Andrew as “stupid” and someone who is “going to have to live a life of ridicule for a long time.”

     

    Going further and making somewhat punchy comments to the paper’s Alex Diaz whilst at the recent CrimeCon event in Las Vegas, Mr Edwards added:

     

    “How stupid can you possibly be to remain friends with Jeffrey Epstein after he was labeled a sex offender and he came out of jail? Have you lost your mind? I imagine the Queen has bent him over her knee a couple of times.”

     

    “He paid a lot of money to settle a case and try to make up for what he allegedly did many years ago.”

     

    “I just wish that in the process, Virginia didn’t have to take the media hit that she did because he was trying to cover his own butt.”

     

    “He should have just accepted responsibility and moved on.”

     

    “A lot of people would hope that the Queen had banished him, but if your own mom’s not going to love you then nobody will.”

     

    Edwards – who was honoured by the New York Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children in November 2020 – was targeted by Epstein and in April 2020 told Page Six that during meetings at a Starbucks in Boca Raton, Florida, the financier told him: “Brad, if you keep prosecuting me in this way, somebody’s going to get hurt.”

     

    Page Six continued: “[Edwards] revealed: “[Epstein] put my family under surveillance, when I called him on it and said, ‘Hey, you put my family under surveillance, you told me you weren’t a bad guy,’ he said, ‘No, no, I just took you off the surveillance – I didn’t realise I had done that. I have a bunch of people who work for me, so see I’m the good guy, I’ll treat you fairly, let’s settle this case.’”

     

    The attorney refused to settle and in due course Epstein was “finally forced to make a full apology in a letter read in court in 2018.”

     

    Continuing exploration of such matters, The Steeple Times’ Matthew Steeples will spend an hour discussing his research into the crimes and connections of not only Jeffrey Epstein but also Ghislaine Maxwell at CrimeCon UK in London on 12th June with YouTube True Crime Channel host and author Shaun Attwood and his podcaster co-host Jennifer Hopkins.

     

    Delving also into Attwood’s 2021 book Who Killed Epstein? and Prince Andrew’s recent settlement with Virginia Roberts, in addition, the trio will turn in the wake of last week’s nigh on 4-hour documentary epic Untouchable take questions about the antics of another royal rotter – the monstrous paedophile and necrophiliac, Sir Jimmy Savile – given that show has attracted an astonishing 120,000 views since it premiered.

     

    Speaking of the forthcoming event, Matthew Steeples remarked Tuesday:

     

    “I am looking forward to being able to return to CrimeCon London after speaking there in September 2021 on the subject of the pension pot plunderer’s deviant daughter and her coterie of evil cohorts.”

     

    “Last year, it was great to spend time with everyone from the punchy storyteller behind the Hunting Ghislaine podcast, John Sweeney, to crime enthusiasts who’d travelled from far and wide because of their interest in the Epstein-Maxwell case and others both Shaun and I’ve covered including the incarceration of Jeremy Bamber and ‘missing’ Madeleine McCann.”

     

    “Last year’s audience for our segment was somewhat small given the size of the room, but with the anticipation of sentencing of Maxwell on the 28th June and a much larger space, I look forward to sharing the stories of my experiences with the key players, both for and against this wicked, now rightly shamed socialite, on 12th June.”

     

    Matthew Steeples will be discussing the sordid stories of Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, Prince Andrew and Sir Jimmy Savile with Shaun Attwood and Jennifer Hopkins at CrimeCon UK on 12th June from 11am to 12 noon at the Leonardo Royal Hotel & Spa, St Paul’s, 10 Godliman Street, EC4V 5AJ.

     

    To book tickets to CrimeCon London 2022 partnered by CBS Reality, click here and use the discount code ATTWOOD to get 10% off ticket prices. The weekend event runs over two days from 11th to 12th June 2022.

     

    Brad Edwards Edwards Pottinger
    The Fort Lauderdale based lawyer for Jeffrey Epstein’s victims, Brad Edwards, has been pursuing the cases of those sexually molested by the taxi driver turned teacher turned sex offender on a pro bono basis for the past decade.
    CrimeCon London Matthew Steeples Shaun Attwood
    Shaun Attwood with co-host Jennifer Hopkins will discuss “two of the biggest stories in true crime” on 12th June 2022 between 11am and 12 noon at the UK’s number one gathering of those interested in true crime in Britain and beyond.
    CrimeCon London 2022
  • Depp v Maxwell –Trial Media Coverage Differences

    Depp v Maxwell –Trial Media Coverage Differences

    Matthew Steeples suggests those moaning that Ghislaine Maxwell’s trial should have been covered by the media in the same way as Johnny Depp’s libel suit do not understand the differences between the two cases; there is simply no “conspiracy” or “cover-up” going on here

    In April 2014, whilst promoting the film Transcendence, Johnny Depp remarked: “People get famous now for I-don’t-know-what.” He was right and the level of interest in both his British and American court appearances and that of Ghislaine Maxwell’s 2021 trial have provided opportunity for goodness only knows how much of the dirty linen of famous faces to be grubbily bandied around.

     

    Now, amongst others ‘blue ticked’ on Twitter Nick Adams, a “four-time best-selling author” and presidential appointee in the Trump administration, are rather stupidly asking: “Why didn’t the Ghislaine Maxwell trial have the same transparency as the Johnny Depp trial?”

     

    Many others – including some you’d clearly expect better of – go further and ludicrously suggest it to be a “conspiracy” that Maxwell’s criminal trial wasn’t aired on television, whilst Depp’s civil trial of libel allegations has been. Quite rightly, however, this week AP News’s Angelo Fichera called out this “widely shared misinformation” for what it truly is – sheer claptrap and utter baloney.

     

    As was also pointed out by the crusading author of Ghislaine Maxwell: An Unauthorized Biography Kirby Sommers on Twitter also, the Maxwell matter was held in a federal court and “federal courts do not allow cameras like some state courts do.” Depp’s civil suit, meanwhile, is taking place in a county circuit court and as, Fichera adds, “that court court does allow photo and video with a judge’s permission.”

     

    Frankly, it is as simple as that and the “Conservative activist” who Fichera quoted who tweeted: “Sooooo, the Johnny Depp trial can be live streamed but the Maxwell trial can’t? Make that make sense” really ought to just learn to keep up.

     

    Whilst many of us, myself included, would very much liked to have watched the mucky madam and daughter of a pension pot plundering and wartime murderer squirm before the cameras as she was convicted, the rules are the rules and there simply was no “gag order” in the case of Ghislaine Maxwell.

     

    Pictured top – Though both now internationally known, the legal matters that this acclaimed actor and this notorious sex trafficking mucky madam are now forever linked to are being handled by the American legal system quite correctly. One was dealt with in a federal court whilst the other is a civil matter and that is exactly why media coverage – including most pertinently video footage – of these cases has been not-allowed and allowed respectively.

     

     

    Kirby Sommers
    Crusading author Kirby Sommers very accurately summed up the differences between the two cases in a tweet shared on 22nd April 2022. It pointed out the differences between “federal” and “civil” case and ended: “Please learn the difference.”
    Dame Brigitte Gabriel
    Self-anointed “quintessential example of a 21st American Dream story” and one-time news anchor ‘Dame’ Brigitte Gabriel – a “survivor of terrorism” and “NYT best-selling author” told her 435,800 Twitter followers: “The media live streams the Johnny Depp trial and not the Ghislaine Maxwell trial because they think we’re stupid” on 23rd April. Clearly, ‘Dame’ Brigitte ought to be sent to a school in fact checking and learn she’s been duped by what Donald Trump might term “fake news, fake news.”
    Shane Hazel
    Equally, 2022 Republican candidate for Governor of Georgia Shane Hazel is another fine example of a boorish berk who doesn’t get it. He tweeted: “When the news covers Johnny Depp 24/7 but didn’t say shit about Epstein & Ghislaine Maxwell you can be sure it’s because American billionaires are molesting kids” on 22nd April. Mr Hazel has an astonishing 38,900 followers; followers he’s clearly misleading whilst at the same time running for high office.
    Trial differences
    Those claiming to be “kept in the dark” about the criminal trial of the late paedophile Jeffrey Epstein’s one-time lover and co-conspirator in sex trafficking whilst banging on about the live-streaming of an actor’s libel action simply do not understand that there is no conspiracy going on in terms of how media coverage of such matters is handled.
    Tweets 1
    Twitter users have gone utterly bonkers about this, let’s be frank, non-issue. Live-streaming is allowed in some courts and it is not in others and those screaming “conspiracy” and “cover-up” from the rooftops on this subject simply need to accept that there was no “gag-order” in the case of media coverage of the pension pot plunderer’s daughter’s December 2021 trial in New York.
    Tweet 5
    Continuing, the anything but rational Twitterati claimed “money doesn’t talk, it shuts everyone up” whilst others suggested “LMAO” of how the French born associate of amongst others Jean-Luc Brunel, the Duke of York and Harvey Weinstein “couldn’t be recorded” whilst the ‘Pirates of the Caribbean’s’ legal case can.
    Tweet 4
    Amongst words used of the two matters were “distractions” and “should tell you all you need to know.” Wallaby killer Russell Brand even got a mention.
    Tweet 3
    The very same conspiracy theorists claimed also a “media blackout” in the 2021 case whilst the 2022 one “live-streamed for all to see.” One argued: “You can clearly see the media’s agenda here” and another added: “I know which one I care about the most.” Others brought up their thoughts on Ukraine, Hunter Biden and his father, 46th President of the United States of America Joe Biden. Here are people who believe the current coverage is “a joke” yet here also are people who cannot accept that the mucky madam’s trial was heard in a federal court in New York – a place where cameras simply are not allowed to be present.
    Tweets 2
    “Something stinks” and “hush hush” claimed one Scot named Gordon Cameron of what he and countless others on social media believe to be a case lacking in transparency of Maxwell’s trial. He and those like him would do better to ask why none of those that the decidedly deviant mucky madam supplied her victims to have yet been brought before the justice system. As the cook and football club owner Delia Smith once slurred (whilst drunk admittedly): “Come on, let’s be ‘avin ya.”
    The libel case brought by the star of ‘The Tourist’ against his ex-wife Amber Heard has descended into moments of comedy and mirth. It is completely the antithesis of the trial of the one-time lover of Prince Andrew – a trial in which victims of sex trafficking and abuse by the powerful and the privileged was very clearly highlighted. Shamefully, however, none of those other powerful and privileged individuals have yet been brought to book. With sentencing due on the 28th June in the Maxwell case, one can only hope that justice will finally be served on the other evil parties who’ve still to this day remained under the radar.
  • The Thief, His Wife and the Canoe

    The Thief, His Wife and the Canoe

    ITV1’s ‘The Thief, His Wife and the Canoe’ is a must watch; it recasts the narrative of the 2002 disappearance of John Darwin and shows his wife as an under the thumb woman manipulated into fraud – just as said 71-year-old fraudster has supposedly headed off to Ukraine to fight

    Whilst the disappearance of Lord Lucan on 8th November 1974 and the disappearance of Madeleine McCann on 3rd May 2007 are perhaps the two best known examples of disappearances of British citizens, the story of how the fraudster John Darwin went missing on 21st March 2002 is certainly up there in the league of “most famous British missing persons’ cases.”

     

    Highlighted again now – after the first two episodes of ITV1’s The Thief, His Wife and the Canoe aired on Sunday and Monday – is an example of a modern-day Walter Mitty. John Darwin, the primary subject of the series, was a father of two, former teacher, prison officer and a wannabe business tycoon and he was someone with a penchant for living well and truly beyond his means.

     

    After accumulating vast debts after buying up 12 houses to run as bedsits and a Range Rover with a personalised numberplate also, Mr Darwin concocted a plan to make it appear he’d drowned at sea and then have his wife, Anne, claim life insurance policies to clear their debts and help them start a new life free of their financial shackles.

     

    The four-hour ITV drama – written by Unforgotten creator Chris Lang and starring Eddie Marsan and Monica Dolan as John and Anne Darwin – whilst slammed by some for having accents “insulting” to people from Hartlepool is truly worth watching.

     

    In it, whilst John Darwin is rightly portrayed as a true deviant and all-round nasty piece of toerag, his wife is shown to be an under-the-thumb and bullied woman who goes along with the plan because she has a genuine fear of what would happen to her if she doesn’t.

     

    Controlled totally by a man who once supposedly told her only friend that he only allowed her out on voting day, here is a woman who clearly did wrong and clearly orchestrated much of their fraud because her husband was supposedly dead. Here also, ironically, is a woman whose jail sentence was 3 months longer than that of her then husband.

     

    Whilst the real Anne Darwin served her time and is said to be making amends with her two sons, in March, the MailOnline reported that her now ex-husband’s new wife, Mercy Mae Avila Darwin, 48, had told the press that he was “on his way to Ukraine” to fight and ironically had “good life insurance.” The second Mrs Darwin, who runs clothing businesses in Manila, bizarrely remarked of the danger the now 71-year-old will face: “He will have a bullet proof vest… Dangerous for the Russian when he shoot them.”

     

    Of her husband, Anne Darwin once remarked: “He’s got such a good memory. The problem is he was never satisfied with what he had. He always had ideas above his station. He wanted to be grander than he was.” She sums him up perfectly and after watching this show, I, for one, will say that whilst the rotter John Darwin deserves to go down in history as a truly awful specimen, his now ex-wife is a prime example of why second chances should be allowed.

     

    To watch the full four-hour, four episode series, click here.

     

    Pictured top – The then supposedly dead John and his then still wife Anne in Panama in 2006. The photograph had been discovered when a member of the public searched for the words ‘John,’ ‘Anne’ and ‘Panama’ in Google Images. The photo had been featured on the website movetopanama.com and was brought to the attention of the ‘Daily Mirror’ and the Cleveland Police.

     

    TV drama
    Eddie Marsan and Monica Dolan star as the conman and his wife in the ITV drama.
    John Darwin
    Mercy May is said to be bankrolling her husband by sub-letting her market stall and running another shop in Manilla. The conman is supposedly living off his British state pension.
    Anne Darwin
    Of Anne Darwin (pictured recently above), ‘The Guardian’s’ Stuart Jeffries remarked: “’John was the sort of man,’ Anne Darwin tells us in voiceover early in this drama, ‘who would buy a Range Rover we couldn’t afford and then spend £3,000 on a personalised number plate.’ We all know that sort of man. Perhaps you’re married to him. If so – and while I’m not a professional marriage counsellor – my advice is: pack a bag and never look back. Instead, like a more tragicomic Tammy Wynette, Anne stood by her man. Until she could stand him no more, that is. The big question asked… is why it took her so long.”
  • It’s NOT “Duchess Meghan”

    It’s NOT “Duchess Meghan”

    In constantly referencing the Duchess of Sussex as “Duchess Meghan,” PR peddler and arse-licker Omid Scobie proves himself anything but an expert on royalty, titles, honours and protocol

    If you’d believe the twaddle on his Twitter handle, Omid Scobie is supposedly some kind of expert on all things royal. Here is someone who shares “positive vibes only” – please pass the sick bag – and laughably claims to be a “bestselling author.”

     

    If you then turn to reality, you’ll find – as Nikolay Kalinin revealed on these pages in July 2021 – Omid Scobie is in fact instead a pompous prattler who used to hang out with ‘glamour models’ such as Jodie Marsh. He’s anything but a real journalist and is in fact nothing but a wannabe spin doctor whose Twitter following is composed of at least 25% fake accounts.

     

    Botoxed to a point that he actually looks rather like the wench formerly known as Meghan Markle, Scobie is what one might call a ‘groupie’ and in constantly referencing Prince Charles’ second son’s wife as “Duchess Meghan,” he attempts to show familiarity and kinship with the former actress. He is, however, completely wrong and whatever one might wish to call the mendacious minx who may have been married twice or may have been married three times perhaps, it’s most certainly not “Duchess Meghan.”

     

    Whilst it must be remembered that the Duchess of Sussex – as she unfortunately is still correctly known in spite of her and her husband having renounced any kind of royal responsibilities – was forced to apologise over her cooperation with Scobie at the Appeal Court in London in November 2021, the co-author of the bargain bin confined Finding Freedom does, like her also, like to cause a ruckus at any opportunity.

     

    Whether having a pop at the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge over “palace diversity,” as he did during the couple’s recent visit to Jamaica, or making false claims about Sadie Quinlan (AKA ‘Yankee Wally’), here is someone with a clear chip on his shoulder.

     

    Faced with losing his own company, Meyou Limited, right now after failing to keep his accounts up to date, it is time for Scobie to also realise that the Duchess of Sussex – who also retains the titles of Her Royal Highness (not used in practice, but kept in style), Countess of Dumbarton and Baroness Kilkeel – is simply NOT and never will be called “Duchess Meghan.” Lexical semantics do matter and it is time that this tedious twerp was taught just such.

     

    Duke and Duchess of Sussex
    The overtly ambitious and clearly arrogant Duchess of Sussex has unsurprisingly been called out over her supposedly rude behaviour and alleged bullying of staff in many quarters. Unsurprisingly, her chief cheerleader Omid Scobie has little to no interest in highlighting that and only spreads the poison his favourite American wishes to put out there.
    Dan Wootton shared his mirth about Scobie’s use of “Duchess Meghan” on Friday and remarked: “Give it up, mate.”
    Perez Hilton
    Perez Hilton added: “Why refer to her as Duchess Meghan? Meghan Markle and Harry walked away from that life.”
    Twitter users got in on the use of correct titles on Friday. One going by the name of Mrs Frensham rightly responded: “Get with the programme please.”
    Line of Succession
    Another account, Line of Succession, rightly concluded: “Do you mean the Duke and Duchess of Sussex? Why can’t journalists ever get royal titles right?”
    Scarf
    Returning to criticism of Scobie, a “Cambridge fan” going by the name of Scarfie, observed: “Cracks me up when you read “positive vibes only!” In his bio… then read his comment section. Not to mention his snarky tweets.”
    Responding to a discussion about the best and worst things about Twitter orchestrated by Michael Sayman, a “product lead” at Twitter, a user named Amanda observed that she enjoys “talking to people from all over the world” but viewed the presence of the Bot Sentinel bore Christopher Bouzy and his cohort Omid Scobie to be her “least favourite” things on the medium.
    Twitter abuse
    The ‘Finding Freedom’ co-author often bangs on about “hate speech” and “abuse” online and constantly carps about those that have the audacity to have a differing opinion to his own. This pathetic specimen likes to give it out, but he simply cannot cope with a little bit of stick himself.
    Yankee Wally radio
    Twitter user Gill B. twisted the conversation back to logic and reminded the PR peddler: “You will be pleased to learn that Yankee Wally is now a Royal Reporter, having been signed by Sobel Promotions, and will be broadcasting to millions worldwide on Rainbow Radio FM. You and Bouzy have given her a louder voice! Well done!”
  • Abused To Abuser – No Excuses Ghislaine

    Abused To Abuser – No Excuses Ghislaine

    As the ‘Daily Mail’ claims to share new ‘bombshell’ revelations suggesting Ghislaine Maxwell herself a victim of abuse, we remind them that this story is nothing new and abused to abuser should not be allowed as her excuse

    In 2019, Eleanor Berry – daughter of the one-time chairman and editor-in-chief of the Daily Telegraph and Sunday Telegraph Baron Hartwell of Peterborough Court in the City of London (1911 – 2001) and a woman who crazily considered Robert Maxwell a “surrogate father” – wrote a book in which she alleged the pension pot plunderer used to allow his favoured real daughter, Ghislaine, to choose how she got beaten.

     

    Self-declared “black humour” specialist Berry’s suggestion that the daughter ‘The Bouncing Czech’  named his yacht after was whipped also has long done the rounds and featured also in the crusading author Kirby Sommers’ Ghislaine Maxwell: An Unauthorized Biography and on our pages also, but now the former Vanity Fair editor Tina Brown (AKA Lady Evans) has got in on the game and written of these allegations also.

     

    Featured three years after they first surfaced, the story of how the now convicted criminal mucky madam Maxwell was effectively herself a victim of parental abuse was yesterday ludicrously described as a “new bombshell” by the Daily Mail’s chief reporter Martin Robinson. A simple Google search might have prevented Lord Rothermere’s operation making this error, but clearly nobody at Northcliffe House bothered to even think of that.

     

    Clearly, Mr Robinson was fed the uber connected Lady Evans’ publisher’s press release about her no doubt very heavily promoted tome. If he’d actually done some checks, he would have realised that Berry’s revelations to this particular author – which originally but unmentioned by the Mail included that Ghislaine Maxwell had been seeing a psychiatrist over “daddy’s canings” in New York in the 1990s – are nothing new and remain unsubstantiated.

     

    Whilst it is well-known that the most definite bully, thief and supposed war criminal Robert Maxwell had a temper that made the Emperor Nero look mild, the excuse that his now incarcerated daughter simply went  from abuse victim to abuser is somewhat pathetic and insulting to her multiple victims.

     

    After ‘dodgy daddy’ died by means foul or fouler depending on who you’d believe on his yacht in 1991, this wicked wastrel had a choice. Ghislaine Maxwell’s siblings accepted that their papa had died of natural causes; she did not and then she headed to New York and took up with Jeffrey Epstein – an equally perverted sexually perverted monster and Ponzi schemer whom her father had most definitely met prior to his deserved demise.

     

    At that time, Ghislaine Maxwell could have decided to make up for what had gone wrong in her world. Betty, her Roman Catholic mother, after all, devoted her subsequent life to researching the Holocaust, yet her French born 60-year-old daughter decided to take up sex trafficking minors. The choice is telling of a woman whose own father once said: “I have a beautiful daughter and she’s just like me.”

     

    Of Ghislaine Maxwell, the wonderfully witty wonder that is Anne Robinson – who worked for Robert Maxwell on the Mirror in the 1980s – is the one who actually sums up the deviant daughter best. In school mistress like fashion, the current host of Countdown remarked in June 2021: “She had a horrendous childhood, she lacked goals.”

     

    Pictured top – A glum looking Ghislaine Maxwell with her now late mother and a photograph of her late father. Though some have lauded the now convicted sex offender’s mother as a “good woman,” others have argued that she had an equally wicked and warped sense of morals to her clearly completely lacking in a moral compass husband.

     

    Ghislaine Maxwell Robert Maxwell Betty Maxwell
    In 2019, Eleanor Berry recounted of the familial abuse she claims to have been told of by Ghislaine Maxwell (pictured left with her father and right with her mother): “I know I shouldn’t have asked a nine-year-old child the question, but I was absolutely riveted. I tried to hide the tone in my voice. ‘When you said your father is going you a ‘hiding’ what sort of a hiding will it be?’ I asked as casually as I could. Ghislaine looked nonplussed… I was fascinated by the sight of the punitive instruments which had been arranged in a row on the table. Among things I notice, were a riding crop, a ruler, a stick, a cane, which made a swishing noise, on being brought down through the air, and a shoe horn which couldn’t inflict any pain at all. I regret that I was behaving very irresponsibly by toying with the psyche of a child… I completely lost my head. ‘I would ask your father if I could lower my trousers and whip me with the cane,’ I said. ‘What? On your bare bottom?’ ‘Yes,’ I said without thinking. I had caught a bit of sunstroke that morning and my wits were not about me. ‘Why would you ask my father to beat you on your bare bottom with the cane, particularly when the cane is the most painful of the lot? You’re not making any sense.’ It was at this point I got scared, as I feared Ghislaine would repeat my words to her father. ‘Well Ghislaine,’ I replied, ‘pain affects different people in different ways. If I were a man whipping me, I would only want him to be your father.’ … Ghislaine persisted like a dog knowing at its favourite bone. ‘I really didn’t understand you, when you said you’d actually like to take down your trousers and be whipped by my father.’” In a subsequent passage Berry describes Betty Maxwell as “[reminding] her a bit of Fagin, when he was counting tiaras” in the context of a conversation she had overheard about this abuse.
    Anne Robinson Tina Brown Lady Evans
    Anne Robinson (left) was amongst those not afraid of ‘Cap’n Bob’ when she worked for him; fellow journalist Tina Brown (right) is now, however, being incorrectly made out to be sharing “bombshell” news that is anything but news about how the mucky madam daughter of the pension pot plunderer was abused by her very own father.
    Jeffrey Epstein
    In February 2022, Kirby Sommers shared of a woman who replaced her monstrous father with the equally monstrous Jeffrey Epstein after the former’s death: “So, she knows she’s going to get a beating and Robert Maxwell storms into his office and Eleanor Berry goes on to chat with 9-year-old Ghislaine and Ghislaine is just ‘ho, hum, ho, hum, he’s going to hit me and Eleanor Berry says: ‘That’s really interesting and what tends to happen?’ Ghislaine gets up off the ground and she leads Eleanor into the house and into this room and she shows her a table and on the table are all kinds of things. There’s like a brush and a paddle and a whip. It goes on and on, there are all sorts of things that she can later choose. He allows her to choose, obviously, what he is going to beat her with. Eleanor is asking her: ‘What are you going to select?’ and Ghislaine tells her that she’s going to select the paddle because it doesn’t really hurt that much, but her friend, who is a lot older than her and in fact has a crush on Robert Maxwell says: ‘Well, I would select this.’ The whole thing is just a very bizarre episode, not only because here is an older woman talking to this 9-year-old child about her own sexual fantasies that she has about her father, but by this point it didn’t matter to Ghislaine that she was going to have a beating by her father. Later on, as she grows up, we now know it now through the victims allegedly… That Ghislaine was into say that world, that sadomasochistic world. She would treat her ‘sex slaves’ and I have to call them that because that’s how they refer to themselves with cruelty. This is something else she got from her father: She got the ability to turn on the charm, but to be cruel when needed. In her case, because she was a female, she learnt early on to turn on the charm for men and she was always very cruel to women – which she still is, she still is.”
  • Funding A Fool

    Funding A Fool

    That the fool Prince Andrew and his feckless live-in ex-wife were prepared to accept £1.3 million from a Turkish conman illustrates how low their moral compasses truly are

    It may be April Fools’ Day, but today and every day both the non-sweating, Pizza Express loving Prince Andrew and his toe sucking loving wife Sarah, Duchess of York opt to play the role of cringeworthy court jesters.

     

    With news that the Queen’s rotten-to-his-core and national embarrassment second son has been paid £1.1 million and his live-in ex-wife has been paid £225,000 in addition by a Turkish conman comes further proof that here is a couple completely lacking in any kind of moral compass.

     

    According to The Sun, a former Goldman Sachs banker named Selman Turk and his associate Nebahat Isbilen made “suspicious” payments to the pair as part of a £40 million fraud. It is alleged the sum “would pay for a help with a passport” and in return Mr Turk got to be given an award at St James’s Palace by the prince at one of his Pitch@Palace events.

     

    Speaking of yet another especially sordid situation, a spokesman for the Duchess of York took the usual dopey excuse line and remarked: “The duchess was completely unaware of the allegations that have since emerged against Mr Turk. She is naturally concerned by what has been alleged against him.”

     

    Aside from the fact also that feckless ‘Fergie’ has still to confirm whether or not she ever repaid loans she took from the since croaked paedophile Jeffrey Epstein and also from Chinese investors, Prince Andrew also managed to make a spectacle of himself when escorting his beleaguered mother down the aisle at Westminster Abbey this week. After the event, unsurprisingly, the Internet turned on the randy royal and condemned his presence as a totally inappropriate distraction.

     

    In all of his actions the Duke of York – someone who it must also be noted paid circa £12 million to a woman he’d previously claimed never to have actually met – simply continues to illustrate how out of touch he is with the reality of the situations he has himself created. Here is a moron-not-a-man with an ego the size of Russia and an out-of-touch-with-reality buffoon clearly incapable of accepting what he truly must now do: Disappear into obscurity and never again expect to have an ounce of respect from a single member of the public.

     

    Shame on Prince Andrew and shame on those that continue to enable this festering turd by continuing to give him such significant chunks of change.

     

    Pictured top – ‘Randy Andy’ thinks himself a bit of a card whilst the wastrel formerly known as Sarah Ferguson likes to go on YouTube to read books about farting. This pair of royal rotters ought to be thoroughly ashamed of themselves, but of course they’re anything but sorry about their continually appalling antics.

     

    Amusing 1
    After Prince Philip’s memorial, the Internet wash awash with individuals commenting on how utterly shocked they were with the Queen’s selfish second son’s decision to put himself centre stage at the event.
    Amusing 2
    Even the tediously tepid Greta Thunberg got a mention.
    Grubby groper Randy Andy
    Grubby groper ‘Randy Andy’ should come to realise that his presence at any public event is not required. Here is someone whose actions have brought shame and disgrace on his family and here is someone whose proximity to convicted sex traffickers Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein and accused sex abusers such as Peter Nygård illustrate how tawdry, tacky and tasteless he truly is. It is now time only for one thing: Get this right royal rotter gone.
    Matthew Steeples Tweet
    Matthew Steeples of ‘The Steeple Times’ took to Twitter and suggested that this “festering turd” needed “to be flushed.” Here is a national embarrassment and ‘bestie’ of the coffin dodger Bernie Ecclestone whose moral compass has been frankly stir fried.
  • Public Randy vs. Private Harry

    Public Randy vs. Private Harry

    Whilst privacy obsessed yet decidedly public when for profit Prince Harry won’t be attending his grandfather’s memorial, his now disgraced uncle Prince Andrew surprisingly will be rocking up for this clearly public occasion

    A mouthy mouse-not-a-man who is also a mouthy mouse-not-a-man who doesn’t sweat who eventually willingly paid £12 million to a woman he previously claimed he’d never met has announced that he is going to be making his first public appearance since making his out of court settlement on 29th March.

     

    Pizza Express loving Prince Andrew (or ‘Randy’ his few remaining chums), a spokesman this morning confirmed, will now attend the memorial service for Prince Philip next week and of this the Daily Star’s Benedict Tetzlaff-Deas reported:

     

    “The decision regarding Andrew’s attendance was understood to depend on whether she considered the service a family event or an official engagement… The decision regarding Andrew’s attendance was understood to depend on whether she considered the service a family event or an official engagement.”

     

    Responding on Twitter, one user, Anthony Akhurst, commented: “Why is this moron still free and not behind prison bars?” whilst another, Northern Lass, pointedly added: “Be interesting to see who doesn’t snub him.”

     

    A rare and more sympathetic voice, however, came in the form of one Graham Marshall. He tweeted: “We allow prisoners to attend such events. Prince Andrew should attend Duke of Edinburgh’s memorial service – have some humanity.” It would be most interesting to know what Mr Hawick would have to say if introduced to the many, many, many victims of the Duke of York’s convicted criminal besties Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.

     

    Meanwhile, in a very clear snub in spite of the fact he’s managing to travel to the Netherlands for another publicity stunt, the drip that is Prince Harry will not be attending his grandfather’s memorial service and nor will his ‘Modern Day Mrs Simpson’ wife, the meddling minx that was formerly known as Meghan Markle.

     

    Pictured top running and sweating (left) and guffawing (right) – The arrogant and avaricious Duke of York is undoubtedly man who has brought the royal family into its most embarrassing moment in modern history. This shameless friend of the coffin dodging Putin apologist Bernie Ecclestone would do best to disappear and disappear forever.

     

    Laughing stock
    Though the public shame of Prince Andrew seemed to be complete, his decision to return to attend a public event is going to distract from that very event. Yet again, this self-centred twerp has put himself before his mother and siblings and though some would say he has very right to be there, if he had any sense he’d pay his respects privately instead given the sordid mess he himself created.
    Yacht party
    Rather than focusing on duty, both the Duke of York and his feckless thicko live-in ex-wife, the former Sarah Ferguson, have spent their lives holidaying and personal profiteering. Their associations with people of dubious backgrounds including dictators, paedophiles and crooks – many of whom they’ve holidayed with – always comes back to bite them in their not so sorry arses.
    Corsica yacht holiday 2011
    The age and name of a young lady the Queen’s second and favourite son cavorted with and kissed in the sea on yet another yachting jolly in Corsica in 2011 remains the subject of much discussion amongst critics of this rotten royal.
    Goga Ashkenazi Ascot
    Pictured at Ascot with his “very, very close friend,” the Oxford educated Kazakh businesswoman and socialite Goga Ashkenazi, the Duke of York’s connections have often been called out. Defending him, Ashkenazi told the ‘Evening Standard’ in April 2012: “I told Andrew not to worry, that he’d done nothing wrong, and that it was being blown out of proportion. Of course, he knows it was unwise to fraternise with this Epstein character, and it was silly to be photographed with his arm around Epstein’s masseuse [Virginia Roberts]. But I know Andrew as a lovely, lovely man – kind-hearted, impeccably behaved and honourable – and I’m quite sure that at the time he had no idea that she was underage or anything more than a masseuse to Epstein.” Going further of her role in selling the former marital home of her mate, Sunninghill Park, at a price grossly over-inflated to a decidedly questionable chap who’d also been her lover, without a jot of regret, she added: “It was never bought for personal use. The plan is to convert it into a charitable school for bright Kazakh children who can then try for the top British universities.” That turned out to be a bag of bilge given there is now another naff mansion standing on the site.
    https://twitter.com/NorthernLass72/status/1506185665251270657
  • Bring Back ‘Yankee Wally’ – The Duchess of Sussex’s nemesis should NOT be cancelled

    Bring Back ‘Yankee Wally’ – The Duchess of Sussex’s nemesis should NOT be cancelled

    Matthew Steeples slams the vindictive campaign against YouTube sensation Sadie Quinlan – known as ‘Yankee Wally’ – by the mendacious ‘Sussex Squad’ groupies led by PR peddlers Omid Scobie and Christopher Bouzy and helped along by a bashful ‘BuzzFeed News’ busybody named Ellie Hall

    The Duchess of Sussex has an inconvenient past she’d most certainly rather forget; her nemesis Sadie Quinlan (AKA ‘Yankee Wally’) has just such too.

     

    Whilst witty Welsh warbler Quinlan served her time and has openly admitted her prior indiscretions, the mendacious minx that is the former Meghan Markle has most certainly never been open, for example, about her supposed past relationship with a gay porn actor known as ‘Dirt Nasty.’ She was also forced to apologise to the Appeal Court in London in November 2021 and has been called out for being a bully allegedly also.

     

    Now, after a busybody Washington, D.C. based ‘senior reporter’ for BuzzFeed News named Ellie Hall last week produced a somewhat lacklustre ‘article’ linking the Duchess of Sussex’s half-sister Samantha Markle to Sadie Quinlan, the latter’s YouTube ‘Yankee Wally’ channel has been closed. It was done so after the snitch-on-her-sources Hall sent her so-called “evidence” to the social media video sharing medium and thereby proved herself not to be a “reportage writer” but instead a “troll-like campaigner.”

     

    According to joker-not-a-journo Hall, a clearly woke spokesman for YouTube named Jack Malon told her: “Upon review, we have terminated the ‘Yankee Wally’ channel for repeated violations of our harassment policy, which prohibits content targeting individuals based on intrinsic attributes. We enforce this policy equally for everyone, and channels that repeatedly violate or are dedicated to violative content are terminated.”

     

    Responding, Matthew Steeples of The Steeple Times commented: “Whilst the opinions of Sadie Quinlan might not to be everyone’s taste, she is as entitled to her views as much as anyone else. Just like with the case of Shaun Attwood – whose YouTube account has also been removed on occasions – the process by which such occurs is clearly beyond strangely and stupidly regulated.”

     

    “Whilst YouTube is entitled to control its domain in whatever manner it chooses, the fact that a Welsh woman is ‘cancelled’ for simply discussing a topic clearly of interest to her nigh on 50,000 followers seems ludicrous in the extreme. Ms Quinlan, to me, seems as dangerous as a chocolate teapot whilst those campaigning against her – headed by PR peddlers Omid Scobie and Christopher Bouzy – are the true villains of this piece.”

     

    Elsewhere on Friday the Daily Express reported that after the Daily Mail diarist Richard Eden shared news that he had contracted coronavirus, a clear ‘Sussex Squad’ supporter with the handle @royals_sussex trolled him with a meme featuring the reprehensibly vindictive words: “If he dies, he dies.”

     

    Duchess of Sussex Duchess of Cambridge
    Jealous to her core, the wife of the dimwitted drip Prince Harry has never managed to get over the fact that the British public love the Duchess of Cambridge yet loathe her.
    Simon Rex Cutright Dirt Nasty
    The Duchess of Sussex’s love life prior to bagging Prince Harry involved a fair amount of what could be termed “lowlife.” The finest example was most certainly tattooed trashbag Simon Rex Cutright.
    Gay porn actor turned musician Simon Rex Cutright (AKA ‘Dirt Nasty’) – shown here in a somewhat intoxicated state in a video shared on YouTube – supposedly dated the then Meghan Markle in 200. He claims to have received a letter from her after refusing to sell his story of how they “just hung out” after doing “a TV show together” and meeting “for lunch.”
    Richard Eden if he dies he dies
    The clear hatred of ‘Sussex Squad’ fanatics was shown in this tweet to ‘Daily Mail’ diarist Richard Eden – an open critic of such people – on Friday after he revealed he had contracted coronavirus. Though this vicious and vile message was reported by many, it remains live on Twitter.

    Can anyone solve a problem like ‘MeGain’?

    • In November 2021, the duchess was forced to apologise to the Appeal Court in London for making a misleading statement in her privacy case against The Mail on Sunday’s publishers.
    • Her very own father, Thomas, has called out her many untruths about him and others again, again and again.
    • Of her claiming having got married the day before she actually did, Mr Markle stated: “Lying about the archbishop? How can you say: ‘We’ve been married three days before we got married’? Her lies are so obvious, I don’t know why she says them.”
    • Her very own half-sister, Samantha Markle, has called the woman formerly known as Meghan Markle out as a liar on multiple occasions also. It has been proven that the duchess’s claim that she hasn’t seen her sibling in over 20 years was proven untrue when a photo of the pair 13 years ago emerged.
    • Her very own half-brother, Thomas Jr., said of her: “I told Prince Harry, I think she’s going to ruin your life. She’s very shallow… She’s a phony, a bully, a jaded, shallow, conceited woman.”
    • The former Meghan Markle has been called out on multiple occasions for spinning stories against other members of the royal family, most especially the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge.
    • Staff who’ve worked for her have complained that she is a bully and investigations into this remain ongoing.
    • The Duchess of Sussex is a known manipulator of the press and paparazzis and it has been claimed that she’ll “twist the truth” to get any headline she wants.
    • Questions remain as to how many times she’s actually been married in total. Some say twice, some say thrice.
    • “Would you trust this woman with a bargepole?” is something often asked of this money motivated minx.

     

    Ellie Hall
    ‘BuzzFeed News’ writer Ellie Hall is a woman clearly lacking in journalistic integrity. She snitched on her own sources rather than protecting them. Shame on her.
    Ellie Hall 1
    That the “senior reporter” was keener to brag about getting her source cancelled than actually reporting a story speaks volumes as to her lack of decency and respect for honesty in the profession she claims to be part of.
    Ellie Hall 2
    This is not the work of a crusading journalist, but instead that of someone obsessed with getting revenge on someone she simply doesn’t like.
    Christopher Bouzy
    Clear crackpot Christopher Bouzy is another fine example of a troll dedicated to causing trouble for anyone who dares to speak out against the mendacious minx that is ‘MeGain.’ He is a troll of the very first order in spite of claiming to be a campaigner against such.
    Omid Scobie 1
    Omid Scobie has been highlighted in ‘The Steeple Times’ for what he truly is on a number of occasions. He is anything but an honest journalist and instead blocks real ones such as Richard Eden because he cannot face the truth. That truth? That he simply a peddler of piffle and poison on behalf of a woman and her husband who’ve insulted the Queen and her family a little beyond too often.
    Omid Scobie 2
    The ‘Finding Freedom’ author’s delight in the expulsion of a Welsh woman from YouTube is clear indication that he is nothing but a pathetic specimen worthy of sectioning to Siberia.
    Yankee Wally troll
    The vitriolic nastiness of ‘Sussex Squaddies’ was clearly shown in a tweet by someone going by the nonsensical name of ‘Diana Queen of Hearts’ @BlueNextWaves this morning. They tweeted a remark that suggested they did not care that Sadie Quinlan is now in hospital after her supporters revealed news of such in the hours prior.

  • Will Grubby Ghislaine Give Up Names?

    Will Grubby Ghislaine Give Up Names?

    Matthew Steeples asks: “Given that both Jeffrey Epstein and Jean-Luc Brunel have been ‘suicided,’ will Ghislaine Maxwell now cough up the names of any of her co-conspirator sex abusers?”

    With both Jean-Luc Brunel and Jeffrey Epstein supposedly “suicided” and Bernie Madoff’s sister killed in a most curiously timed murder-suicide by her hubby, there’s now only the rancid ratbag Ghislaine Maxwell left rotting in the clink.

     

    Awaiting sentencing for sex trafficking, the mucky madam – whom the Metropolitan Police watched but failed to do anything about in London in 1994 – Miss Maxwell’s brother, Ian, last week spoke about Brunel and told the New York Post: “The family fears for her safety.” He added:

     

    “It’s really shocking. Another death by hanging in a high-security prison. My reaction is one of shock and bewilderment.”

     

    Going further and claiming it “ironic” that his sister was on suicide watch whilst Brunel and Epstein were not whilst in prison, Mr Maxwell yet again moaned about the “violation of prison rights and human rights” his convicted criminal sister is quite deservedly subject to whilst elsewhere on Twitter, the @RealGhislaine account his family controls continues to bang on about the “biased” juror ‘Scotty David.’

     

    Found unsurprisingly guilty on 29th December 2021 of enticing, grooming and sexually abusing underage girls with Jeffrey Epstein, ‘The Bouncing Czech’s’ decidedly deviant daughter faces upto 60 years in prison when she is finally sentenced on the 28th June 2022 and yet again today we ask of her: “Will you finally trade in a few of your co-conspirators and name some names?”

     

    Pictured top – Paedophile Ghislaine Maxwell having her breasts massaged by the since croaked paedophile Jeffrey Epstein whilst sat on the ‘Lolita Express’ with the also since croaked paedophile Jean-Luc Brunel.

     

    Ghislaine Maxwell
    Ghislaine Maxwell Jimmy Savile Prince Andrew

    Names in the firing line most obvious from Ghislaine’s filthy ‘Little Black Book’ as she seeks to minimise her sentence

    • Alexander Acosta
    • Woody Allen
    • Ehud Barak
    • Tom Barrack
    • Jean-Luc Brunel
    • Naomi Campbell
    • President Bill Clinton and his wife Hillary
    • Alan Dershowitz
    • Glenn Dubin and his wife Eva
    • Bill Gates
    • Geordie Greig
    • Lord Mandelson
    • Marvin Minsky
    • George J. Mitchell
    • Rupert Murdoch
    • Peter Nygård
    • Bill Richardson III
    • Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman
    • Kevin Spacey
    • Jes Staley
    • Ken Starr
    • President Donald Trump and his potentially trafficked wife Melania
    • Ivana Trump
    • Chris Tucker
    • Harvey Weinstein
    • Leslie Wexner
    • Prince Andrew, Duke of York and his live-in ex-wife Sarah, Duchess of York

     

    Examples of rotten-to-her-core Ghislaine Maxwell’s deviancy

    Proof that “wannabe insane” (but in fact just clearly acting up) Ghislaine Maxwell is well evidenced. That she’s as trustworthy as Pinocchio is provided by the facts:

     

    • The croaked paedophile Jeffrey Epstein’s ex-bestie used invented names whilst on the run in the summer of 2019 including Jennifer Marshall and Jen Marshall.
    • Maxwell’s purchase of a house ironically called ‘Tuckedaway’ is indicative of her clearly giving the justice system the proverbial middle finger. Whilst living there, she “demonstrated willingness and sophisticated ability to live in hiding,” according to prosecutors.
    • When the FBI arrived at ‘Tuckedaway’ to arrest her, Maxwell tried to flee and was also found with a mobile telephone wrapped in aluminium tin foil – a tactic used by criminals seeking to make their devices untraceable.
    • When arrested, Maxwell was discovered along with a “security company staffed with former members of the British military guard” whom had been hired by her brother.
    • Of her antics during her arrest, the FBI declared: “[She made] a seemingly misguided effort to evade detection… by law enforcement.”
    • Of why they decided to hold her in custody, Audrey Strauss, the acting U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York declared: “The government respectfully submits that the defendant cannot meet her burden of overcoming the statutory presumption in favour of detention. There are no conditions of bail that would assure the defendant’s presence in court proceedings in this case. Accordingly, any application for bail should be denied.”
    • When asked by the FBI which countries she was a citizen of, supposedly insane Maxwell arrogantly replied: “[I am a citizen of] TerraMar.” TerraMar is a non-existent place.
    • Maxwell is a citizen of three countries: The United Kingdom, France and the United States of America. After her arrest, prosecutors pointed out France “does not extradite its citizens to the United States pursuant to French law.”
    • She also has strong connections with Israel and her equally deviant father is buried there on the Mount of Olives.
    • The 95-page address book – generally incorrectly referenced as Jeffrey Epstein’s ‘little black book’ – compiled by Maxwell and filled with countless friends of hers. It totals 1,971 individual names and provides clear indication of her ties and connections to powerful people across the globe.
    • Maxwell has huge cash resources and has previously cited the ability to offer up £21.1 million ($28.5 million, €24.6 million or درهم7 million) and likely has other funds that have not yet even been declared.
    • Maxwell has the qualifications and ability to pilot submarines and aside from that and her husband Scott Borgerson’s maritime connections, the pair have links to plenty of wealthy people who could speed the alleged mucky madam away in a covert fashion using such vessels.
    • Mr Borgerson claimed to be “an ex-military man” during the time the couple were purchasing ‘Tuckedaway’ and was previously in the U.S. Coast Guard. It is obvious that such skills would be useful to his wife if she were to go on the run.
    • Maxwell appeared in a photoshopped image released to the press by an associate in August 2019. The image featured a bus stop with an advert that had never been shown at that location.
    • The Maxwell family have hired body doubles to try and deceive the media and authorities as to rotten-to-her-core Ghislaine Maxwell’s location.
    • Maxwell did not even tell her own family she had been married to her now estranged husband Scott Borgerson since 2016 prior to her arrest.
    • Maxwell’s lawyer’s release of the image of her with a black eye – which they claimed to have been caused by abuse by guards – turned out to be an example of fake news. She had actually simply suffered from an eye infection.
    • Of Maxwell, her very own friend, the fruitcake Lady Victoria Hervey once tellingly declared: “I don’t think anyone is going to find her. She’s gone far away. She’s a bit like a James Bond character. She’s quite a unique person and I don’t believe anyone is going to find her… I don’t think we will ever see her again, it’s going to be like Robert Maxwell continued; she will continue that family mystery.” Clearly, ‘Lady Herpes’ wasn’t bang on the nail on that one (not that she is ever bang on the nail ever).
    • Proecutors have declared Maxwell has “the resources and skills to flee prosecution and added: “She is an extreme risk of flight.”
    • Judge Nathan has previously declared of Robert Maxwell’s daughter: “[There are] no combination of conditions that can reasonably assure her appearance [if she is granted bail].”

     

    Jean-Luc Brunel Israel
    The death by supposed suicide of Jean-Luc Brunel – pictured on Jeffrey Epstein’s ‘Paedo Island’ curiously wearing a hat emblazoned with the words “Israel Army” – should most definitely be considered suspicious. It came at a time far too convenient as the ‘clean-up’ of this murky, mucky saga continues.
    Jeffrey Epstein suicide prison cell
    Jeffrey Epstein’s supposed suicide as the guards watching him supposedly slept also seems far too convenient. What next for his former lover and deviant daughter of the pension pot plunderer? Will she live on? Will she croak also? Will she name names? Will she she get off because of a dodgy juror? This is a story that keeps on giving.
  • Vicky Vanishes – Lady Victoria Hervey Quits Twitter

    Vicky Vanishes – Lady Victoria Hervey Quits Twitter

    Party pest and piffle peddling pillock Lady Victoria Hervey vanishes from Twitter; the mouthy moron likes to criticise others, yet clearly can’t take criticism herself

    First, earlier this month, in spite of having more front than Harrods and a mouth larger than Russia, prattling pillock and daughter of a convicted thief Lady Victoria Hervey blocked The Steeple Times on Twitter.

     

    Clearly incapable of taking criticism on the chin, in spite of happily taking media money to peddle piffle about Prince Andrew and Virginia Giuffre, cowardy custard Lady Victoria has now gone further and closed down her Twitter account completely. She did so after being confronted by The Mail on Sunday’s Charlotte Griffiths about her pestering the crusading author of Ghislaine Maxwell: An Unauthorized Biography Kirby Sommers on the social media platform.

     

    Responding to a request from Griffiths about why she had contacted Sommers “seeking dirt” on Virginia Giuffre, ‘Lady Herpes’ abruptly answered: “Mistook her for someone else. I never use Twitter. Had an intern do it, hence all the typos. I don’t write like that.” Now, Vicky dear: Please try pulling the other one; next!

     

    To purchase a copy of ‘Ghislaine Maxwell: An Unauthorized Biography’ by crusading author Kirby Sommers, click here.

     

    Lady Victoria Hervey Twitter account blocked
    Lady Victoria Hervey blocked ‘The Steeple Times’ account and that of Matthew Steeples on Twitter also in early February 2022. If asked, she’d probably claim that she got her no doubt unpaid intern to have done that for her too.
    Lady Victoria Hervey Twitter account closed
    By Sunday 20th February, the @Thebritishladyv Twitter account appeared with the message: “This account doesn’t exist.” No doubt the aristoprat capable of leaving a trail of debts amounting to £350,000 when her Knightsbridge knicker flogging boutique went under, got her intern – if he or she actually exists – to do the closing down for her.
    https://twitter.com/KirbySommers/status/1493201393439719429
    On 14th February, Kirby Sommers shared the begging letter sent to her by Lady Victoria Hervey on her Twitter feed. In it, the birdbrained blonde asked: “Wondering if you have any diet [sic] for me on Maria or Viginia.” She clearly meant “dirt,” but yet again illustrated that she most definitely should never enter a spelling bee contest.
    Instagram 1
    Elsewhere on Instagram (a technological medium she seems capable of using herself apparently), illustrating that she remains in cahoots with Ghislaine Maxwell’s PR team the lover of threesomes included a link to Jay Beecher’s TheMaxwellFiles.com – a website filled with utter gibberish about the case against ‘The Bouncing Czech’s’ deviant daughter. She also referenced a story from ‘The Mail on Sunday’ by Sharon Churcher – the journalist who first revealed the picture of Prince Andrew, Ghislaine Maxwell and Virginia Roberts to the world in February 2011 – and aside from suggesting “[she’s] lucky it’s 2022 or she would be hung for TREASON” added: “These people are the bottom feeder gutter rats.”
    Instagram 2
    In other Instagram story posts, the “toff you’ll never see on ‘Mastermind’” demanded that Ghislaine Maxwell be released “until her new trial date” and claimed that the mucky madam sex trafficker “isn’t safe” in the Metropolitan Detention Center. The one-time lover of both Prince Andrew allegedly and Jeffrey Epstein definitely awaits sentencing on 28th June 2022 and aside from being monitored continually, has the luxury of a floor of the prison to herself and all sorts of privileges. The only thing this wicked criminal hasn’t got is Krug on tap. Diddums.
    Lady-Victoria-Hervey-Instagram
    In June 2020, further illustrating the vileness of her tongue, Lady Victoria – who has been known also to come out with clangers including “I’m not stupid. I’m not a dumb model” and “[I aim to become] the next Kate Winslet – but with class” – was deservedly lambasted after she attacked the Black Lives Movement in spite of her own ancestors having been abolitionists. After ‘The Steeple Times’ first and the ‘Mail on Sunday’ subsequently named and shamed her, she deleted her clearly highly offensive Intagram post, but it remains clear that she still doesn’t realise what an utter berk she truly is.