The Steeple Times

Category: Telly Box Twerps

  • Tommy’s Trolls v Sussex Squaddies – Vile Abusive Troll Supporters of Ghislaine Maxwell, Tommy Robinson and Duchess of Sussex

    Tommy’s Trolls v Sussex Squaddies – Vile Abusive Troll Supporters of Ghislaine Maxwell, Tommy Robinson and Duchess of Sussex

    Whose troll is worse? The bigots who support racist Tommy Robinson, the apologists for mucky madam Ghislaine Maxwell or Meghan Markle’s ‘Sussex Squaddies’?

    Whilst Ghislaine Maxwell has pathetic PR peddling pillocks like Brian Basham and Jay Beecher still batting for her on social media in spite of the evidence pointing towards that they – just like the lawyers currently suing her for £754,000 ($878,000, €877,000 or درهم2.2 million) over their unpaid bills – won’t get a dime for their time, the likes of the Tommy Robinson and the Duchess of Sussex continue to follow her lead and encourage their deranged troll followers to harass anyone who dares call their appalling antics out.

     

    Yesterday, when rabid racist Robinson was trending on Twitter over his hate-stoking towards Pakistani men, I dared to suggest that it rather suited his narrative of profiteering from the somewhat beyond stupid supporters who’ve funded his lifestyle for long now, I was met with comments that included suggestions that I was a “grooming gang apologist” and indeed a “nonce” myself.

     

    Clearly endgendered with the intent of encouraging hate crimes against myself and others who agreed with my sentiments, these keyboard warriors are the kind of people that wouldn’t say boo to a goose in a pub, but assume that from behind their nasty net curtains they can make threats and issue slurs to their hearts’ contents.

     

    In the hours that followed, after calling out one particularly obnoxious woman believed to be called Lucy Terina (whose mangled missives are shared below along with those of ‘Sussex Squaddie’ leader Christopher Bouzy), Robinson’s ranters bombarded me with hate and suggested all kinds of nonsense. In doing so, however, all they did was illustrate to anyone rational that Twitter is simply an echo room where those that shout loudest simply make the biggest berks of themselves.

     

    The grubby groper Ghislaine Maxwell and the mendacious minx that is the Duchess of Sussex should take note – employing trolls simply puts you in the same league as the racist Tommy Robinson. Now please girls, pipe down and play nicely.

     

    Pictured top (left to right) – A covered in milkshake Tommy Robinson, a contemplative Ghislaine Maxwell and a seriously smug Duchess of Sussex.

     

    Fake-Followers
    Plastic-anything-but-fantastic Omid Scobie, like the equally off-his-merry-rocker chump Christopher Bouzy, peddles poison and lies for the Duchess of Sussex. He is not a journalist, but in fact someone who encourages gross mistruths about other members of the royal family to be spread. Whilst the rest of the world condemned the wicked wench formerly known as Meghan Markle for her ludicrous ‘Archetypes’ podcast, in his ‘Yahoo!Life’ column Scobie raged: “Once silenced by the establishment, it’s clear that Meghan finally has her voice back. A voice that will be very familiar to those who followed her before Harry. This time, however, she’s brought an entire movement alongside it.” No doubt his huge number of “fake” followers adored that gibberish.

    Example Troll – @terinalucy1972 (Presumably actually named Lucy Terina)

    The not-so-lovely London based Lucy Terina unsurprisingly backs Brexit and as well as hash-tagging that also adds: #Borisismasterofbrexit. That’s she a big fan of Tommy Robinson leads to only one conclusion about this brazen bigot and that is: “How terribly predictable.”

    Example Troll – @cbouzy (Christopher Bouzy, BotSentinel)

    ‘Blue ticked’ by Twitter in spite of being nothing but a nasty piece of toerag, Christopher Bouzy targets anyone who dares speak out against those he’d love to be more closely involved with – namely the Duchess of Sussex and Amber Heard. He has a past clearly chequered and peppered with questionable episodes. It’s no surprise that one of Ghislaine Maxwell’s favoured mouthpieces, Jay Beecher, associates with him.

  • The Age of ‘MeGain’ – Is The Duchess of Sussex Really 41 Today?

    The Age of ‘MeGain’ – Is The Duchess of Sussex Really 41 Today?

    As the Duchess of Sussex supposedly turns 41, pundits question whether this is yet another example of her “convenient truths” and suggest she could actually be now aged 45

    Today marks, if you believe her nonsensical narrative, the 41st birthday of the Duchess of Sussex. Today, if you don’t believe her narrative and side with her estranged sister Samantha, it is actually the wicked woman formerly known as Meghan Markle’s 45th birthday.

     

    Described as “having a very conflicted relationship with the truth” on many matters on Quora and accused again this week by crusading author Kirby Sommers of having met Prince Andrew and his since croaked paedophile mates Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell prior to hooking up with Prince Harry, here is a woman whose age is estimated as high as 46 – five years older than she herself claims.

     

    Accused also of having “fabricated past stories to bolster her career as an actress,” the now wife of Prince Harry’s claimed, aged 13 at the time, that she kissed a boy also aged 13 when they both attended a summer camp in Santa Monica. Given, that ‘boy,’ “honour winning entertainer and author” Joshua Silverstein, is listed as having been born in 1977, that would make the pair of them 45 and most certainly not 41.

     

    Today, as some wish her a happy birthday and others wish she’d just disappear forever into obscurity, it is time for some answers. Come on alleged ‘yacht girl’ Meghan, it’s time for the truth; how old, actually, are you?

     

    Today on Twitter, Matthew Steeples asked: “Do you believe the woman formerly known as Meghan Markle is turning 41 today or do you believe her estranged sisters and others who suggest she might actually be turning 45?” The overwhelming response thus far suggests that the Twitterati believe the Duchess of Sussex to be telling porky pies about her real age.
    Samantha Markle and sister Meghan
    Samantha Markle was supposedly born on Tuesday 24th November 1964, which makes her 57 years, 8 months old. Her sister, she has claimed in legal documents is 13 years older than her, which would make her 45 years old and born in 1977 and not 41 and born in 1981 as she has claimed.
    Centre of attention 1
    At a time when the Queen has lost her husband and suffered the indignity of the embarrassment caused by her second son ‘Randy Andy’s’ antics with the likes of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, the attention seeking ways of Prince Charles’s second son and his trashbag American wife are not exactly helpful.
    Speculation
    Quora users have long speculated about and questioned the date of birth of the daughter of Thomas Markle and Dora Ragland. They, frankly, simply do not believe her suggestion of having been born on the 4th August 1981.
    Centre of attention 2
    Whatever the situation and whomever she is with, here is anything but camera shy woman who has to make utterly everything about herself.

    Can anyone solve a problem like ‘MeGain’?

    • What year was Meghan Markle actually born in? Is she 41 and born in 1981 or is she 45 and born in 1977 as has variously been claimed?
    • In November 2021, the duchess was forced to apologise to the Appeal Court in London for making a misleading statement in her privacy case against The Mail on Sunday’s publishers.
    • Her very own father, Thomas, has called out her many untruths about him and others again, again and again.
    • Of her claiming having got married the day before she actually did, Mr Markle stated: “Lying about the archbishop? How can you say: ‘We’ve been married three days before we got married’? Her lies are so obvious, I don’t know why she says them.”
    • Her very own half-sister, Samantha, who is currently bringing a defamation case against her, has called her out as a liar on multiple occasions also. It has been proven that the duchess’s claim that she hasn’t seen her sibling in over 20 years was proven untrue when a photo of the pair 13 years ago emerged.
    • Her very own half-brother, Thomas Jr., said of her: “I told Prince Harry, I think she’s going to ruin your life. She’s very shallow… She’s a phony, a bully, a jaded, shallow, conceited woman.”
    • The former Meghan Markle has been called out on multiple occasions for spinning stories against other members of the royal family, most especially the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge.
    • Staff who’ve worked for her have complained that she is a bully and investigations into this remain ongoing.
    • The Duchess of Sussex is a known manipulator of the press and paparazzis and it has been claimed that she’ll “twist the truth” to get any headline she wants.
    • Questions remain as to how many times she’s actually been married in total. Some say twice, some say thrice.
    • “Would you trust this woman with a bargepole?” is something often asked of this money motivated minx.
    National Enquirer
    Speculation about the former actress having had “hook-ups” with Matt Lauer have been doing the rounds. The former NBC news personality had his contract terminated with NBC in November 2017 after it was revealed he’d been into all sorts of sexual inappropriate behaviour in the workplace.
    Globe
    “Humiliated” Prince Harry’s wife has been accused also of being his “puppet master” and “destroying” him. His friends are said to have “blasted” her for taking him away from them and isolating him in their Montecito mansion.
    Tanya Gold on Meghan Markle
    In 2019, tedious twerp and ‘Unherd’ contributor Tanya Gold got the Duchess of Sussex completely wrong when she wrote in the ‘New York Times’: “Why does Meghan have the press in such paroxysms? Well, she is an interloper: divorced, American, biracial and, apparently, progressive. And she dares not only to inhabit the role of duchess but also to make it her own. Still, her critics – energized by their racism, misogyny and snobbery – can relax. She is not a revolutionary socialist, nor a convincing human rights activist who destroy everything they love. She will not bring down the royal family. In 2019, she is precisely what it needs.” Oxford educated (but Oxford hating), former alcoholic Tanya clearly ought to stick to other topics – she’s best known, after all, for also bigging-up the late paedophile Jimmy Savile as a “national treasure” and “enabling Savilisation.”
  • Knickers In A Twist – Harry’s £800k Pants – Royal Underpants For Auction

    Knickers In A Twist – Harry’s £800k Pants – Royal Underpants For Auction

    Former Las Vegas stripper attempts to auction drippy Prince Harry’s black underpants for the ludicrous sum of £800,000; who on earth would want these soiled goods?

    Whilst interest in Tom Bower’s book on them, Revenge: Meghan, Harry and the war between the Windsors, continues to ignite the passions of the Twitterati in spite of it actually revealing very little new, a former Las Vegas stripper is now selling a pair of black underpants Prince Charles’s second son gave her in August 2012 because she quite rightly believes he’s become a “bore.”

     

    Set to be auctioned on 17th August this year at the Hustler Club in Las Vegas, what the Mirror described as a “raunchy keepsake” have been guided at £800,000 ($963,000, €942,000 or درهم3.5 million) along with the dress and swimsuit worn by British born Carrie Reichert (now known as ‘Carrie Royale’ and formerly nicknamed ‘Lady Dominique’) on the occasion when she met a man she dubbed then “fun Harry.”

     

    Speaking of why she is selling now, 43-year-old Reichert told the paper:

     

    “Harry has become such a bore, it’s a real shame. When he partied in Vegas, everyone loved him and his sense of fun. At least these pants are a reminder of what he used to be like… when Harry was the fun prince.”

     

    “It’s a shame he’s all po-faced and serious these days. Even as a married dad of two, he should still let his hair down now and again – what’s left of it any way.”

     

    Elsewhere dubbed “miserable and pompous” following his speech last week to a virtually empty room at the United Nations on Mandela Day, the Duke of Sussex continues to cause trouble for his relatives. This morning, the MailOnline’s Stewart Case shared news that the royal renegade “is reported to have completed his eagerly awaited autobiography.

     

    Of it, Case claimed “publisher Random House is aiming for the book to be out in time for the Thanksgiving and Christmas Holidays, when it could be marketed as a gift.” Frankly, who on earth would want it – apart from ‘MeGain’ and perhaps also PR peddler Omid Scobie?

     

    Pictured top – An especially unkempt and miserable looking Duke of Sussex at the United Nations in New York last week with his very ambitious crackpot wife sat alongside looking, as ever, as if she is the cat that well and truly got the cream.

     

    Carrie Reichert Carrie Royale
    Of the underwear story, ‘The Sun’ ran today with the headline: “Get ‘Em Orf’ and shared its previous front page of the royal in the buff – published on Friday 24th August 2012 in “Britain’s most popular paper” as a “souvenir printed edition.”
    UN speech
    The speech by the Duke of Sussex clearly wasn’t exactly welcomed at the United Nations given how many empty seats there were when he got up to ramble and rant and interfere in matters that he has no actual qualification. Here is a mouse-not-a-man who is, a bit like Boris Johnson, controlled by his pugnacious puppet mistress. What a shame that this once “fun loving” has become nothing but a drip and a hypocrite who brings nothing but shame on his relatives.
    Soulmate and Inmate Duke and Duchess of Sussex
    Twitter users compared the Duke of Sussex to an “inmate” and referenced his wife – who notably kept grabbing him by the hand during their visit to the UN in a most controlling fashion – as a “soulmate.” Frankly, they’d have done better to term her “prison governess.”
    Miserable
    Whilst the wicked wastrel woman formerly known as Meghan Markle looked utterly smug during their appearance in New York, her husband sat looking utterly trapped. The expression on his face was not of a man happy with his lot, but one of someone who looks utterly trapped. Life in America and away from his caring family clearly does not suit this spoilt little twerp and at some point, most likely, he will definitely try and escape.
  • Dershowitz Ditched – Larry David Snubs Alan Dershowitz

    Dershowitz Ditched – Larry David Snubs Alan Dershowitz

    As he faces a court showdown with Virginia Roberts Giuffre, Ghislaine Maxwell apologist Alan Dershowitz gets deservedly snubbed by his now former friend Larry David

    Seinfeld and Curb Your Enthusiasm star Larry David was rightly lauded after calling out the lawyer and Ghislaine Maxwell apologist Alan Dershowitz as “disgusting” last week after “bumping into him at a grocery store in Martha’s vineyard.”

     

    In an interview by telephone with Isaac Chotiner – published in The New Yorker on Tuesday 19th July – the emeritus professor of law at Harvard declared he had been “cancelled” for “daring to defend” Donald Trump and stated of his encounter with David:

     

    “What happened is – it’s interesting because I was having lunch with a very radical lawyer who loves me. I mean, he disagrees with me. We argue all the time, but he is not part of the Chilmark crowd. So I was having lunch with him and then a number of other people were there. Suddenly, Larry David walks in to buy some groceries. I say, ‘Hey. Hi, Larry,’ and he turns away, and he just walks away. I say, ‘Larry, can’t we at least talk?’ He said, ‘No. You’re disgusting.’”

     

    “He said, ‘I saw you pat Mike Pompeo on the back.’ It’s true. I did. Here’s the story. It was the Abraham Accords, or the movement toward peace in Israel under the Trump Administration, which I played a central role in.”

     

    He said, ‘I saw you pat Mike Pompeo on the back.’ It’s true. I did. Here’s the story. It was the Abraham Accords, or the movement toward peace in Israel under the Trump Administration, which I played a central role in.”

     

    Asked if he’d watch Curb Your Enthusiasm again, the leading Ghislaine Maxwell apologist curtly responded:

     

    “No. Because I know that the Larry David that’s in Curb Your Enthusiasm is not a fictional character. He’s the real Larry David… If you know that he’s the real Larry David, that curmudgeon, the nasty guy.”

     

    Elsewhere last week, Virginia Roberts Giuffre – whom accuses Dershowitz of sexually abusing her on at least 6 occasions and claims him to be “engaging in revisionist history” – revealed that she is seeking a date of March 2023 for their defamation. The lawyer and retired Harvard professor has previously claimed to have never met the woman Prince Andrew paid £12 million to in spite of also claiming to have never her and has also called her a “certified, complete, total liar.”

     

    Pictured top – Comedian and actor Larry David in a ‘Make America Great Again’ baseball cap (left) and lawyer Alan Dershowitz enjoying a giggle with the late croaked paedophile Jeffrey Epstein (right).

     

    BBC
    The BBC was rightly forced to apologise for giving the loudmouth lawyer airtime in December 2021 after Ghislaine Maxwell’s conviction in New York. On Twitter, their press team declared giving the lawyer the opportunity to speak “did not meet the BBC’s editorial standards.” They added that they subsequently realized that he “was not a suitable person to interview as an impartial analyst, and we did not make the relevant background clear to our audience.” They concluded: “We will look into how this happened” yet unsurprisingly no heads subsequently rolled.
    Harvard
    Dershowitz and Epstein pictured together at a Harvard event. The pair liked to portray themselves as sophisticated, but frankly both of them have ended up as being portrayed as grasping, grubby gropers. Of the latter, the former told the ‘Miami Herald’ in June: “Everybody missed it. My wife and I never saw young girls at that house. There was never a young girl in that house. There was never a picture of a young girl in that house. There were pictures of [former President Bill] Clinton, and other prominent people.” Of Virginia Roberts Giuffre, he added: “I want all the $20 million [in civil settlements] she’s gotten to be taken away from her and given to the real victims,” Dershowitz said. “Which I will do. I want her to go to prison for committing massive perjury. This case will never be over until Virginia Giuffre pays the price for her false accusations.”
    Red wine
    Dershowitz (left) drinking red wine with Epstein (centre) and former Treasury Secretary and later Harvard President Lawrence Summers (right) at a Harvard sponsored event on 9th September 2004 in Cambridge, Massachusetts.
    Virginia Roberts Giuffre
    At the likely March 2023 trial, lawyers for Roberts Giuffre (pictured above) intend to call in-person witnesses (aside from herself) including David Boies, Sigrid McCawley, Brad Edwards, Paul Cassell, David Stone and Epstein’s first known British victim, Anouska de Georgiou.
    Alan Dershowitz was played by Ron Silver in the 1990 American drama film ‘Reversal of Fortune’ with Jeremy Irons as Claus von Bülow and Glenn Close as Sunny von Bülow. The 111-minute film grossed £12.3 million at the box office and was lauded for its “exceptional performances” and “cunning script.”
  • Mandela & MeGain – Duke & Duchess of Sussex trend on Twitter as hypocrites and liars

    Mandela & MeGain – Duke & Duchess of Sussex trend on Twitter as hypocrites and liars

    As the Duke and Duchess of Sussex are slammed as “hypocrites” and “liars,” they perform another “PR stunt” in announcing a forthcoming speech on Mandela Day

    “At Archewell, we unleash the power of compassion to drive systemic cultural change” begin the Duke and Duchess of Sussex on the website for their “non-profit.” They continue by referencing the noun “Arche” as a “Greek word meaning ‘source of action’” and “Well” as “a plentiful source or supply; a place we go to dig deep.”

     

    Trending this morning on Twitter with hashtags including #PrinceHarryisaLiar, #PrinceHarryisaHypocrite, #PrinceHarryisaRacist, #MeghanMarkleisaLiar, #MeghanMarkleisaBully and #MeghanMarkleisaNarcissist, Yahoo!News yesterday reported Prince Harry will be “relaunch[ing] his career as a global humanitarian with a keynote address to the United Nations in New York next week to mark Nelson Mandela day” on Monday next.

     

    Described by the publication’s Tom Sykes as an attempt to “flirt with increasingly political causes” and an attempt to “turn a page on the humiliations they suffered during their visit to England for the Platinum Jubilee, where snubs by the royals, which included being seated behind the Duke of Gloucester in a church service and being banned from appearing with the Queen,” here is another example of the decidedly drippy but also deviant duo yet again stirring the pot.

     

    Rightly, Sykes pointed out “many observers were left wondering what the purpose of their appearance was” and resultingly on Twitter, condemnation and mockery followed.

     

    In separate news, the noxious nuisance formerly known as Meghan Markle has failed in her attempt to dismiss her half-sister’s defamation suit against her whilst the singer Dolly Parton’s sister has come out in support of the actress turned activist.

     

    Stella Parton stated: “I think more people should speak out when they see phony [sic] people in high places thinking their snooty behavior is ok. I also think it’s very telling of Meghan’s sister to change her name back to Markle then use it to trash her little half-sister.”

     

    Twitter 1
    Twitter users including @DuchessPnocchio reacted to the trending topics about Prince Charles’ second son and his wife by stating “let’s keep this trend rolling.” The intense dislike for the pair of pontificating prattlers continues to grow.
    Twitter 2
    Another @tartanpirate1 added: “Guess his past misdemeanors have come back to bite him. That’s what you get when you Nelson Mandela, the global freedom fighter against Apartheid as a PR stunt to launch your business. Still standing on the back of others, eh?”
    Twitter 3
    @LemonTrifle concluded: “2 of the most hypocritical, deplorable people ever to step foot off a private jet and sashay into the UN to record private conversations on hidden recording equipment.” Here, indeed, are a couple that are considered an embarrassment to the royal family and here is a pair who have proven themselves to be not at all private – as they had claimed they wanted to be – but instead publicity seeking personal profiteers.

    Can anyone solve a problem like ‘MeGain’?

    • In November 2021, the duchess was forced to apologise to the Appeal Court in London for making a misleading statement in her privacy case against The Mail on Sunday’s publishers.
    • Her very own father, Thomas, has called out her many untruths about him and others again, again and again.
    • Of her claiming having got married the day before she actually did, Mr Markle stated: “Lying about the archbishop? How can you say: ‘We’ve been married three days before we got married’? Her lies are so obvious, I don’t know why she says them.”
    • Her very own half-sister, Samantha, has called her out as a liar on multiple occasions also. It has been proven that the duchess’s claim that she hasn’t seen her sibling in over 20 years was proven untrue when a photo of the pair 13 years ago emerged.
    • Her very own half-brother, Thomas Jr., said of her: “I told Prince Harry, I think she’s going to ruin your life. She’s very shallow… She’s a phony, a bully, a jaded, shallow, conceited woman.”
    • The former Meghan Markle has been called out on multiple occasions for spinning stories against other members of the royal family, most especially the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge.
    • Staff who’ve worked for her have complained that she is a bully and investigations into this remain ongoing.
    • The Duchess of Sussex is a known manipulator of the press and paparazzis and it has been claimed that she’ll “twist the truth” to get any headline she wants.
    • Questions remain as to how many times she’s actually been married in total. Some say twice, some say thrice.
    • “Would you trust this woman with a bargepole?” is something often asked of this money motivated minx.

     

  • Not So Arresting Andy – Prince Andrew Could Be Next FBI Arrest Target

    Not So Arresting Andy – Prince Andrew Could Be Next FBI Arrest Target

    As mendacious mucky madam Ghislaine Maxwell is set to rot in the clink for 20 years, her mouthy mucker mate Prince Andrew may be arrested by the FBI

    The non-sweating nosebag nosher who paid £12 million to a woman he supposedly never met Prince Andrew may never be able to set foot on American soil again.

     

    The Duke of York – whose coffin dodging chum Bernie Ecclestone again shoved his hooves in the proverbial yesterday by again senselessly claiming he’d “take a bullet for Putin” – is, the New York Post revealed, to be targeted by lawyers for victims of his late croaked paedophile bestie, Jeffrey Epstein, and his now incarcerated co-collaborator and convicted sex offender, Ghislaine Maxwell.

     

    Of this juicy development for the non-sweating “favourite” son of the Queen, Spencer Kuvin, a lawyer for several of the victims of Epstein and Maxwell, told the Mirror: “Obviously, Andrew is one of the targets they will be looking into. He should definitely be concerned, but, if he did nothing wrong, then come forward and tell the full story to the FBI, not the media.”

     

    The paper’s United States editor Christopher Bucktin observed: “Mr Kuvin named other targets, which included another Briton” and going further the lawyer who secured Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s out-of-court settlement with the royal, Brad Edwards, stated: “Let’s hope they’re the next target. If we have anything to do with it, they will be.”

     

    Speaking to The Sun subsequently, Kuvin surmised: “Anyone who took advantage of a minor as a result of being provided that minor by Mr Epstein or Ms Maxwell should be prosecuted as well.”

     

    “It is highly unlikely an extradition would ever occur, so the Prince would have to be here in the US and be arrested while he’s here.”

     

    “Tell Prince Andrew he should spend the summer here in the US. Come on over to vacation.”

     

    Contrasting elsewhere and yet again sticking her oar in where it is not wanted, Lady Victoria Hervey has been doing the rounds with appearances on Channel 5 News and GB News to again claim the 2001 photograph of the then Miss Roberts and Prince Andrew at Ghislaine Maxwell’s then Belgravia home to be a fake.

     

    Speaking to the Daily Mail’s Richard Eden this morning, the aristocrat laughably concluded: “It’s so sad what’s happened to Andrew.”

     

    In other news on Friday in ‘The Sun,’ the prince was slammed by Paul Page, a Buckingham Palace armed protection officer in the 1990s and 2000s. He observed: “He’s a self-absorbed, obnoxious, horrible little man who is disrespectful to those below him… Andrew has something to hide and he has questions to answer – but I don’t think he will ever be in a position where he will have to answer them because of who he is. He’s got the ‘HRH’ title in front of his name, Ghislaine hasn’t – where is she? Jail. Where is he? At home. Simple as that.” Speaking previously of the relationship between his former boss and Ghislaine Maxwell, the former police officer stated: “From the way she was allowed to enter and exit the palace, at will, we realised… suspected, that she may have had an intimate relationship with Prince Andrew. A colleague of mine remembered her coming in four times in one day from the morning till the evening – she kept coming in and out, in and out.”
    Twitter users called for the FBI to go after ‘Randy Andy’ with one remarking: “WHY should Prince Andrew be allowed to avoid prosecution? By paying the women he allegedly abused, he’s admitted guilt. I hope the FBI keep chasing him down.” Another added: “If Ghislaine Maxwell was a British Princess and Prince Andrew was just a ‘socialite,’ Ghislaine would be walking free right now and Andrew would be spending 20 years in prison. Being royalty is a Get Out of Jail Free card.”
    44 Kinnerton Street 10th March 2001
    Whilst Lady Victoria Hervey may peddle her belief that the photograph taken of Prince Andrew, the then Virginia Roberts and Ghislaine Maxwell at 44 Kinnerton Street, Belgravia, London, SW1 on the evening of the 10th March 2001 is a fake, others including the photographer who photographed the original photograph in 2011, New Zealander Michael Thomas, takes an entirely different view. Speaking to the ‘New Zealand Herald’ in February, Thomas remarked: “As I have said before, it was just an ordinary photo you would have got from a chemist in the days of negatives. Surely, if it was fake, every media outlet in the world would be getting sued for using it. The fact that isn’t happening, to me says everything.” Of the image, previously in 2019, Thomas commented: “It wasn’t like she pulled the photo of Prince Andrew out, it was just in among the rest of them. They were just typical teenage snaps. There’s no way that photo is fake.”
  • Cash, Rockets & Mucky Madams 2022

    Cash, Rockets & Mucky Madams 2022

    As Ghislaine Maxwell’s former business partner Jemma Kidd takes part in a car rally that raises money for victims of sex trafficking, we again call out the ridiculous vanity project of rich-not-robust women that is Cash & Rocket

    Cash & Rocket is a ‘charitable organisation’ that claims to seek to bring about the “empowerment of women,” but it is actually ironically best known for having counted the since convicted sex trafficker of women Ghislaine Maxwell as amongst its participants in 2019.

     

    Now, with news, post coronavirus lockdowns, that the car rally is again on the road, The Steeple Times contacted Cash & Rocket’s founder and CEO, Julie Brangstrup, for comment as to her view on the forthcoming sentencing of Robert Maxwell’s mucky madam daughter. We have yet to receive a reply.

     

    With news from the Daily Mail’s Richard Eden this morning that Jemma Kidd (AKA the Countess of Mornington) – who counted the croaked paedophile Jeffrey Epstein’s onetime lover as a director of her now dissolved since January 2020 Jemma Kidd Makeup Limited company – is participating in this year’s event, we again question the clearly odd associations of Cash & Rocket.

     

    Happening this year between 9th to the 12th June and involving 80 women driving between Barcelona and Florence via Provence and Milan, the website for the ‘teams’ participating is very much more vague than in 2019. It does not, most tellingly, include the surnames of any participants and though it is claimed £291,460 has been raised thus far, we again today remind Julie Brangstrup that she still has questions to answer.

     

    In March 2021, we observed:

     

    “Whilst all mention of Ghislaine Maxwell from Cash & Rocket’s website and social media, the stench of the involvement of this incarcerated alleged sexual abuser of women is something that still needs to be explained. We today call upon Julie Brangstrup to ‘woman up’ and explain how the ‘Bouncing Czech’s’ deviant daughter was allowed to join the event on 13th June 2019 given alleged victim Maria Farmer had already filed a sworn affidavit against Maxwell on 16th April that year.”

     

    The Steeple Times’ Matthew Steeples will be interviewed by leading true crime podcaster and author Shaun Attwood about Ghislaine Maxwell and her likely fate tomorrow, 12th June, at CrimeCon 2022 in London between 11am and 12 noon. To purchase tickets to attend, click here and use the code ATTWOOD to get 10% off the price of tickets.

     

    Pictured top – The Alfa Romeo that Ghislaine Maxwell was the co-driver in in the 2019 rally with Annette ‘Nettie’ Mason, wife of Pink Floyd drummer Nick Mason.

     

    Jemma Kidd
    Of her involvement in the 2022 rally, the ‘Daily Mail’s’ Richard Eden this morning quoted Lady Mornington as “gushing”: “Can we just have an appreciation of how bloody spectacular this car is… It’s a 3-litre V6 hybrid from Ferrari and it goes from 0 to 60mph in 2.9 seconds. It’s blown my little socks off.”
    Rally 2019 Wellington Arch
    An image of the 2019 participants in Cash & Rocket’s rally at the Wellington Arch launch event on 13th June 2020. Miss Maxwell was presumably hiding ‘Where’s Wally?’ like somewhere within this shot.
    2019 rally
    In another image, shared a little more widely previously, the mucky madam posed next to the Alfa Romeo she co-drove with Nettie Mason with Paris Hilton and Caroline Stanbury behind her.
    Ghislaine Maxwell 2019
    The ‘charitable organisation’ featured Miss Maxwell on their website during the 2019 event but have since removed all reference to her. The profile for the drivers of ‘Car 28,’ at the time, bizarrely suggested they’d raised “£0” and thus proved their fundraising abilities to be “as much use as a chocolate teapot.”
    Matthew Steeples CrimeCon 2022
    Shaun Attwood with co-host Jennifer Hopkins will discuss “two of the biggest stories in true crime” on 12th June 2022 between 11am and 12 noon at the UK’s number one gathering of those interested in true crime in Britain and beyond.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uDYB46d3sgA&feature=emb_imp_woyt
  • A Thigh Too Far – Latest Twist In £14m Madeleine McCann Saga

    A Thigh Too Far – Latest Twist In £14m Madeleine McCann Saga

    ‘Missing’ Madeleine McCann £14 million investigation takes a bizarre new twist with still not charged supposed suspect Christian Brueckner set to have his thighs examined

    It has been more than 15 years since Madeleine McCann was last seen alive in Praia da Luz, Portugal and in that time over £14 million of British taxpayers’ hard-earned cash has been lavished on an investigation that has led to, quite frankly, Sweet Fanny Adams, zilch, zero and utterly nothing.

     

    That a child unusual in that she had a colomba of the iris that would make her stand out from any crowd literally vanished into thin air is beyond curious, but what is worse is that unlike with other missing person cases, the powers that be think it appropriate to continue their investigations is beyond acceptable.

     

    Whilst the families of others who have disappeared – such as Martin Allen, Luke Durbin and Ben Needham – get little to no assistance in terms of resources and financing, that Gerry and Kate McCann, a couple who after all left their children unattended, continue to get such high levels of support and media attention is frankly wrong.

     

    Now, at a time when the only remaining ‘live’ suspect in the case, German rapist Christian Brueckner, still has not been charged it is high time to end this charade and time also to reallocate resources to the search for missing people who could actually be found. That he is about to have his legs examined after in a development in an unrelated rape case is neither here nor there and if there was a prospect of him actually being convicted in the 2007 ‘disappearance,’ why haven’t the powers that be  already charged him?

     

    Pictured top – Angry-to-his-core man Gerry McCann and his supposedly ‘missing’ since 3rd May 2007 daughter, Madeleine.

     

    Missing Madeleine – Questions STILL without Answers

    Many questions about what happened on the evening of the disappearance of Madeleine McCann remain. Some that have been highlighted by the press and discussed online include:

     

    • Why did Kate McCann refuse to answer 48 questions put to her by the Portuguese police?

     

    • Why were certain records of phone calls on the evening of the disappearance “whoosh-clunked” from the memories of the phones of Mr and Mrs McCann and the ‘Tapas 7’?

     

    • Why did a British sniffer dog sense the smell of a corpse in a cupboard in the apartment from which Madeleine McCann disappeared?

     

    • Why did a sniffer dog also supposedly sense the smell of a corpse in a vehicle hired by the couple a month after the disappearance of their daughter?

     

     

     

    Christian Brueckner Tweet 1
    The latest twist in the investigation into whether the undoubtedly evil Christian Brueckner actually has any links to what occurred on 3rd May 2007 in Praia da Luz in the Algarve region of Portugal has attracted much commentary on social media and in the international press. It relates to another case involving the German and an accuser who is alleged to have been attacked by someone with “a cross-shaped scar on his right thigh” – something Brueckner’s lawyer, Friedrich Fuelscher, claims him not to have. Of this development, one Twitter user, @Karma_Kiss1, remarked: “It just gets more bizzare, examine his thighs to look for a scar. The victim stated the rapist had. Should rule CB out once and for all. How many more cases will they try to pin on him? #mccann #Madeleinemccann.” Mr Brueckner maintains he had no involvement in the 2007 ‘disappearance.’
    Tweet 2
    Another user, @maddiesvoice1, returned to an old theme and linked to an article about the Home Office keeping secret files on the case to avoid a diplomatic incident with Portugal and observed: “Files kept secret. An institution labelled as institutionally corrupt housing rapists abusers and murderers. Entrusted with the case of a missing/dead child spending £14 million and 15 years later proving nor finding a single thing. Cover up anyone? #McCann.”
    Gerry and Kate McCann running Sir Clement Freud
    Kate McCann – a woman who went running, played tennis and dined on chicken and mushroom risotto and egg and watercress salads washed down with strawberry vodka with the paedophile Sir Clement Freud in the days after her daughter ‘disappeared’ – has a clear touch of the former Meghan Markle about her. Like ‘MeGain,’ whom banged on that “not many people have asked if I’m OK,” Mrs McCann said in 2011: “Officers walked past us as if we weren’t there. Nobody asked how we were doing, whether we were okay. Our child had been stolen and I felt as if I didn’t exist.”
    Gerry and Kate McCann Theresa May
    Living it Large – Gerry MccCann enjoying a round of golf (left); Kate McCann at Downing Street, London hobnobbing with Missing People CEO Martin Houghton-Brown, the Duchess of Gloucester and the then Home Secretary Theresa May on 23rd May 2012 (right).
    Sir Richard Branson Sir Christopher Meyer Baroness Catherine Meyer Sir Philip Green
    Amongst those to have supported the McCanns have been especially gobby attention seekers including job wrecker Sir Richard Branson, “Chanel-clad” charity begins at home tin banger Baroness (Catherine) Meyer and her pompous arsehole husband Sir Christopher and job wrecking grabber Sir Philip Green.
    In December 2017, when £11 million of British taxpayers’ money had been spent towards the search for ‘missing’ Madeleine McCann, 86% of viewers of ITV1’s ‘Loose Women’ said the public purse should cease to fund the investigation. Now, in June 2022, with that sum now in excess of £14 million (aside from the millions in private money also), it is time to allocate resources to the search for missing people who actually can be found, we would suggest.
  • Hypocrite Harry’s Jubilee Jet

    Hypocrite Harry’s Jubilee Jet

    Hypocritical Duke and Duchess of Sussex deserve condemnation for indulging in £320,000 worth of private jet flights for their Jubilee trip; just who paid for these unwanted wastrels’ travels remains unknown

    Prince Harry likes to tell others to be environmentally conscious, but now after indulging in £160,000 each way flights on a Bombadier Global 6000 private jet, this brazen buffoon and his deranged diva wife have rightly been condemned.

     

    Shot down as showing “enormous hypocrisy,” this “eco preaching” pair of pontificaters previously took ‘PJ’s’ funded by Sir Elton John and his titleless husband David Furnish in the summer of 2019. When questioned about this excessively indulgent behaviour, the tantrum prone singer responded:

     

    “I am deeply distressed by today’s distorted and malicious account in the press surrounding the Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s private stay at my home in Nice last week… I feel a profound sense of obligation to protect Harry and his family.”

     

    “I’m calling on the press to cease these relentless and untrue assassinations on their character that are spuriously crafted on an almost daily basis.”

     

    This time, rightly slammed as a “grotesque pair of platinum-grade hypocrites” who’ve “stuck two fingers up to climate change issues,” here is a couple who live by the mantra “do as I say, not as I do.”

     

    Having now produced 10 times more carbon than if they had flown commercial and having used up to 30 times their annual carbon footprint in the two flights, it is now time to again call out these two whining whingebags and to simply tell them to fly off into obscurity.

     

    Pictured top – Sir Elton John has repeatedly defended the decidedly dumb Prince Harry and the wicked wastrel wench formerly known as Meghan Markle for using private jets. He is wrong and the public are right to call out the hypocrisy of such antics.

     

    Royal Arrivals
    Described as a “Russian oligarch kind of jet,” the Bombardier Global 6000 aircraft that the couple returned to California on from Farnborough emitted nearly 60 tonnes of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. Of this, the ‘Daily Mail’ stated: “Under the terms of the Paris Agreement objective of keeping global warming below 2C, each person’s carbon budget should be no more than 2.1 tonnes per year – meaning Harry and Meghan exceeded this by nearly 15 times in just one flight. As the Sussexes also flew into Britain on a private jet, and assuming it was the same aircraft, their overall return trip would have exceeded the annual limit by nearly 30 times. By comparison, the carbon emission rating of flying from Heathrow to LA in an economy-class seat on a commercial aircraft is 1.4 tonnes, according to climate consultancy Cube6.” They added: “The Queen’s grandson previously described climate change as one of the ‘most pressing issues we are facing’, and told Oprah Winfrey during the couple’s bombshell interview last year: ‘We need to do better about stopping or allowing the things that are causing so much harm to so many of us at the source, rather than being distracted by the symptom.’”
    Royals Arrivals 2
    In September 2019, it was reported that since marrying the former “yacht girl” Meghan Markle, Prince Charles’s second son is said to have used private plans for six out of ten flights despite claiming to travel commercial 99% of the time. Here is a condescending couple who tell others what to do and then who themselves go and do the exact opposite without shame or explanation.
    Behaving like billionaires but not paying for it themselves seems to be perfectly acceptable to the prince and his deviant American wife.
    The pathetic attention seeking son of the late Diana, Princess of Wales previously claimed that his decision to use private aircraft was because he was determined to “keep his family safe.” Clearly immune to the fact that the vast majority of the public who fly commercial are perfectly safe, here is a brat who clearly has no conception of how hypocritical he and his sordid sidekick truly are.
  • Scobie’s Childish Clownery Backfires

    Scobie’s Childish Clownery Backfires

    MeGain’s nodding dog PR peddler Omid Scobie claims “clownery” forced him to delete a tweet deemed by many “hateful” to a 4-year-old child, Prince Louis

    After beginning his stint at Yahoo! News with a nonsensical “800-word rant” in May, the plastic-not-fantastic ‘Megamouthed Montecito Meddler’ that is Omid Scobie twisted his already leaky pen again last week with a feature titled: “Thomas Markle turned on his own daughter – Meghan owes him nothing.”

     

    As ever, shockingly written and peppered with his trademark use of “snark” and “toxic,” the ‘author’ of the bag of bilge that is Finding Freedom concluded of “publicity-hungry” Mr Markle: “Meghan doesn’t owe him a damn thing” after effectively suggesting that Prince Harry’s wife for now’s father was “conveniently captured” by paparazzi as he arrived at a California hospital after having a stroke.

     

    Aside from being unnecessarily insulting to a clearly unwell man – who he alleged also tells “twisted tales” and has supported “single-purpose-hate accounts about his daughter” – Scobie simply showed himself as ridiculous. Going further, this PR peddler continued in the same vein and yesterday in a tweet about the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge’s son, Prince Louis, again made a total prat of himself.

     

    Later deleted after he was widely condemned for picking on a 4-year-old child, accompanying an image of the clearly nothing but playful youngster, Scobie wrote: “I did wonder why Prince Louis was taken out for a while. Kids will be kids, eh?”

     

    Obviously a pointed jibe that aimed at hinting that the behaviour of the children of the House of Cambridge and the parenting skills of the heir to the throne and his wife are looked on differently to those of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, Scobie was subsequently asked: “Why did you delete your tweet?”

     

    His response – called out as “crying victim” – read: “Because despite turning off comments (something I now try to do on any tweet about royal children), there was negativity in the quote tweets and also some insane trolls claiming ‘kids will be kids, eh?’ is ‘inciting hate.’ I’m tired and have no time or patience for clownery.”

     

    Predictably once again here is a circa 40-year-old mouthy-mouse-not-a-man who throws his toys out of the pram when criticised; equally, shown up by a 4-year-old child, here is a proof that Scobie likes to give it out but he most certainly has again proven he can’t take it back. This gobby gadabout ought to learn to think before he tweets and leave commentary to real journalists and grownups.

     

    OS Tweet 1
    This tweet by the ‘Finding Freedom’ lasted less than a couple of hours. It was widely condemned as a “pointed jibe” and “offensive” and some went as far as to say it simply showed this PR peddler for the ‘House of Montecito’ to be a nasty piece of toerag and a pot stirring troublemaker.
    OS Tweet 2
    Asked why he deleted the missive, pathetic pontificater Scobie threw his toys out of the pram and declared: “I’m tired and have no time or patience for clownery.” In doing so, he simply illustrated himself to be anything but thoughtful in his communications and skilled at nothing but drawing attention to himself by any means.
    Response 1
    “Crying victim,” however, did not work out well for him and instead other Twitter users remarked of their view that he is the one “enabling hate” and “encouraging hate online against children.” He would have been wise not to have embarked on such a course of action in the first place, but having done so, his back peddling proved even more disastrous.
    Richard Eden
    The ‘Daily Mail’s’ Richard Eden responded to last week’s ‘Yahoo! News’ article by suggesting that it is “the royal family [who owe] Meghan nothing” rather than her owing her father nothing.
    OS Tweet 3
    Bragging about his article on 31st May on Twitter, the former ‘Heat’ magazine columnist and sometime mate of the titty flashing ‘glamour model’ Jodie Marsh called out the Duchess of Sussex’s father as a “toxic parent” who “has a long history of causing stress, anxiety and pain.” He argued: “Cutting them out is often the only answer” in spite of having no known knowledge of psychology.