The latest pathetic excuses not apologies offered by ITV presenters Ferne McCann and Phillip Schofield prove this pointless pair of pillocks to be utter plonkers and total disgraces
Queue jumping as the Queen lay in-state, it seems, was perfectly excusable to ITV This Morning presenter Phillip Schofield; insulting the sixteen victims of the acid chucking father of her child, it seems, was perfectly excusable to sometime ITV This Morning presenter Ferne McCann.
“Have you got nothing better to do with your time? … Why should I apologise?” raged rabid Schofield yesterday when approached outside his home by a reporter from GB News when asked if he thought he thought he was unfairly targeted in what became known as the ‘Queuegate’ scandal. The notoriously nasty flogger of noxious boxed ‘plughole plonk’ then continued: “I think [Holly Willoughby and I] were unfairly targeted… You’re a bit late with that story, mate.” The sometime ‘friend’ of Matthew McGreevy then slammed his door; he no doubt then went and had a little weep.
Elsewhere yesterday, fellow ITV presenter Ferne McCann – a wicked-wastrel-woman who disgracefully flogged lip plumping primer beauty products online on the very day in December 2018 when the father of her child, Arthur Collins, was sentenced for throwing acid over sixteen innocent people – took to Instagram to issue a wishy-washy set of words about voice notes in which she shockingly termed scarred-for-life Sophie Hall, a victim of her ex-shagging partner, a “silly b*tch.”
Instead of owning and genuinely offering up a heartfelt apology, yesterday (and offering to put right her wrongs also), McCann dug deeper into the hole that she and only she has created. On Instagram, this dimwitted dunce rambled:
“I am aware that people will have a number of questions about the voice messages being put into the public domain and purportedly being sent by me. I feel I have no choice but to address these (to the extent that I can as there are restrictions on me which I explain below).”
“Most importantly I want to apologise to all the victims of Arthur Collins abhorrent actions in 2017 that they have to relive that night and the pain that followed because this matter is again in the public domain.”
‘In particular I want to apologise to Sophie Hall. I do not believe her to be ugly or stupid. She has been brave beyond belief.”
“Arthur Collins’ crimes created genuine victims so I am not trying to portray myself as one. I am unable to say much because there are important and significant legal proceedings that prevent me from setting the record straight at this stage.”
“What I can say is that the voice messages that are being released are manipulated; edited and taken entirely out of context.”
“Even so, I will have said things that are untrue and I did not believe – but I did so to protect my family and myself from serious harm and in the face of significant threats.”
Effectively an admission that she DID say these things – though she claims she didn’t mean them and shouldn’t have said them – here is proof why ITV must not put this victim shaming cretin back on our screens.
Warbling wazzock Ferne McCann, 32, is of mind stir-fried and moral compass warped. She is not fit to lecture others on how to bring up children; she’s beyond childish herself. Blubbing crybaby Philip Schofield, 60, on the other hand, is older and should be wiser and should know better. He clearly isn’t and just like his over Botoxed protégé, it’s simply time to pension off the nation’s ultimate plonker. Next!
Editor’s Note – Unlike as is the case in many publications, this article was NOT sponsored or supported by a third-party.
'I think we were [unfairly targeted]'
Phillip Schofield refuses to apologise over 'queuegate' accusations that he skipped the queue to see the late Queen lying-in-state. pic.twitter.com/wT4Sf61Sq0
ITV1’s ‘This Morning’ co-host Phillip Schofield cringed and looked as if he was about to snap when approached outside his West London home by GB News presenter Ben Leo yesterday. Here is a mouse-not-a-man who wrongly assumes that he’s some kind of national treasure worthy of not a jot of criticism.Instead of skipping queues and upsetting the nation in the process, the all-round-angry man and ‘This Morning’ host and ex-sidekick of Gordon the Gopher should quit his ITV job and focus on improving his deservedly slammed boxed wines (right). He thought his red “perfect with olives” whilst the public decided it “better poured down the plughole.” Alternatively, he could put some effort into ‘making up’ with his missing from our screens for quite some time now former close friend, Matthew McGreevy.When she thought she could rake in some wonga from ‘OK!’ feckless fool Ferne McCann happily posed for snaps with the since convicted criminal Arthur Collins. This nasty piece of toerag, known best now for her vicious tongue and twisted moral compass, deserves only one thing – permanent cancellation.The only thing on the mind of the now former ‘The Only Way Is Essex’ participant is clearly fame and money. She doesn’t care how she gets it and she doesn’t care who gets hurt along the way. Here is a wazzock woman who clearly couldn’t give a jot about what damage was done to the 16 victims her once-to-be-hubby hurled acid all over. There should be no excuses made for her vile conduct.Courageous victim Sophie Hall has shown resilience and responded to the vicious remarks made about her by stating: “Ferne herself has said before that she struggles with her own appearance. So, to be commenting on how someone else looks –regardless if it was never meant to be heard – is wrong. This is me fighting back and remaining strong. I want them to know we should be proud of our scars because they are a reminder of how strong we are. I would ask Ferne: ‘What have I ever done to you? Why are you targeting me, when all I’ve been trying to do is make a positive out of a terrible and traumatic experience that I sincerely hope no one ever has to go through in their lifetime?’ I wanted to have a positive impact and perhaps inspire people and not only build my confidence, but help other victims out there that may be having a tough time and to show that you can still go on and achieve fantastic things. There’s so much to overcome and I’ve found there’s lots of rounds in this competition that you have to take part in and it has helped me rebuild different parts of my life – it’s helped me massively.” She is to be saluted whilst the ITV ‘This Morning’ presenter should be slammed.
Be sure to follow @ladywhistledown195 on Instagram; you’ll learn plenty about Ferne McCann’s vile views about her acid chucking ex-fiancé and her abhorrent views about his 16 innocent victims
The Instagram account of the moment to follow is undoubtedly an anonymous one that uses the handle @ladywhistledown195. Whether or not the content it shares is genuine has been questioned, but the voice of the person it has recordings of sounds very, very genuine.
In spite of having made just four posts since its first on 28th September, this account has attracted over 66,700 followers. It has come to prominence after using the ‘stories’ function to release voice notes supposedly recorded by ITV television presenter Ferne McCann and boy are they shocking, disgusting and outrageous.
In them, someone believed to be moronic and mouthy Miss McCann – a woman with a child by a menace-not-a-man named Arthur Collins (who is in jail for 20 years for throwing acid over 16 individuals in 2017) – references her ex-lover’s past and her ex-lover’s victims.
Of one innocent victim, Sophie Hall, a poor lady left scarred for life, deciding to enter a beauty contest, a woman generally believed to be McCann is heard to say:
“I don’t know whether to laugh or cry, the silly b*tch has made a dress… A papier- mâché dress out of the newspaper cuttings from the [acid throwing incident] event.”
“She’ll probably win it, I’m not gonna [sic] lie, only because the event and the awards that she has entered or beauty competition, whatever it is.”
‘They’re probably loving all this free press for their event so they’ll probably fix it, she’ll win it.”
Responding, victim Miss Hall has spoken to various publications and variously commented:
“I’m in a state of shock and disbelief.”
“Ferne herself has said before that she struggles with her own appearance. So, to be commenting on how someone else looks –regardless if it was never meant to be heard – is wrong.”
“This is me fighting back and remaining strong. I want them to know we should be proud of our scars because they are a reminder of how strong we are.”
“I would ask Ferne: ‘What have I ever done to you? Why are you targeting me, when all I’ve been trying to do is make a positive out of a terrible and traumatic experience that I sincerely hope no one ever has to go through in their lifetime?’”
“I wanted to have a positive impact and perhaps inspire people and not only build my confidence, but help other victims out there that may be having a tough time and to show that you can still go on and achieve fantastic things.”
“There’s so much to overcome and I’ve found there’s lots of rounds in this competition that you have to take part in and it has helped me rebuild different parts of my life – it’s helped me massively.”
Reporting on the vile notes, the MailOnline’s Joanna Crawley quoted an unnamed ‘source’ who concluded: “Ferne has reportedly been left devastated by the leaked notes and ‘can’t stop crying’ as she has received backlash from fans online.”
Perhaps, instead of crying only after being caught, Miss McCann ought to do the decent thing and stop attacking the sixteen innocent people whose lives were ruined by her ex-lover and ‘baby dada.’
Shame on Ferne McCann and shame on all of those – most especially ITV (a channel that has also given the violent criminal abuser Boy George a platform) – that have and continue to enable this wicked woman to profit from the pain of others. It is time she did the decent thing and that is to learn the art of an apology.
Pictured Top – Ferne McCann and Arthur Collins sold news of their impending-never-to-happen wedding to ‘OK!’ in April 2017 (left) just days before Collins went on the rampage chucking acid over innocent people in a nightclub; later this washed-up-wastrel woman was snapped smashed-off-her-skull (right).
Editor’s Note – Unlike as is the case in many publications, this article was NOT sponsored or supported by a third-party.
When mentally challenged Arthur Collins decided to hurl acid over people he had utterly no connection to, he wore a T-shirt emblazoned with the words: “Candy Killer.” He wore the same item of clothing previously whilst on holiday in Dubai previously when posing in a Rolls-Royce alongside the warped-of-mind woman he never got to actually marry, Ferne McCann.In December 2018, McCann – who very inappropriately took to Instagram to flog lip plumping primers on the day the father of her child was jailed in December 2017 – appeared on ITV’s ‘Loose Women’ with the creepy Christian crooner Sir Cliff Richard. Her latest scandal involving ‘victim shaming’ presents this wicked woman for exactly what she is – sick, twisted and frankly repugnant.
The injuries suffered by victims of the ‘despicable’ acid attack at Mangle, Dalston, London, E8 on 17th April 2017
In December 2017, then 25-year-old Arthur Collins was jailed for 20 years with an extra 5 years on licence at Wood Green Crown Court. He had been convicted in November that year of 5 counts of grievous bodily harm with intent and 9 counts of actual bodily harm.
At the time, Judge Noel Lucas QC remarked: “Your case has attracted a great deal of public interest. This is because what you did at the Mangle club… was a despicable act” before praising the “extraordinary courage” of victims Phoebe Giorgiu, Lauren Trent and Sophie Hall.
Collins, a vile toerag deemed to have a “low IQ that bordered on a learning disability,” was told “he had demonstrated not the least remorse for his actions, which injured 14 people” before he was deservedly sent down, The Guardian reported.
The graphic injuries suffered by the victims of Arthur Collins…
In December 2017, Neal Baker of The Sun detailed the “horrifying extent of the injuries” of the 16 victims whose lives the deranged deviant Arthur Collins changed forever.
Baker noted:
Victim 1: A 29-year-old man, suffered second degree chemical burns to left side of the face, including cheek, eye, eyelids and lips. His wounds extended from right temple and forehead, across the bridge of his nose and into the left eyebrow.
Victim 2: A 24-year-old man, suffered third degree chemical burn injuries to the left side of face, ear, neck and shoulder area. One and a half per cent of total body surface area affected. A skin graft was required.
Victim 3: A 21-year-old man, sustained chemical burns, to right cheek, lower left cheek, and anterior neck with additional areas to his left check and left arm and hand. Six per cent of the total body surface area affected.
Victim 4: A 21-year-old woman, suffered chemical burns, on nose and cheeks extending onto lips, on her left shoulder extending to her left breast. Multiple small blistered areas affecting her neck, upper chest and upper limbs. A corneal abrasion (scratch on eye) with chemical conjunctivitis.
Victim 5: A 23-year-old woman, suffered chemical burns, affecting chest, breasts, neck and upper left arm. Three per cent of total body surface area affected. Surgical intervention to treat abscess infection resulting in a further week in hospital subsequent to her discharge.
Victim 6: A 22-year-old woman, sustained chemical burns, affecting neck, upper chest, abdomen and lower limbs.
Victim 7: A 23-year-old woman, suffered chemical burns, affected forehead and swollen left eye and corneal abrasion.
Victim 8: A 29-year-old man, suffered chemical burns, splash marks over his face.
Victim 9: A 25-year-old man, sustained first degree chemical burns to right cheek and neck and upper limbs.
Victim 10: A 20-year-old woman, suffered chemical burns to right shoulder and back.
Victim 11: A 25-year-old woman, sustained reddening and irritation to skin on foot.
Victim 12: A 24-year-old woman, suffered chemical burns, splash marks affected posterior and left lower leg. One per cent of total body surface area affected.
Victim 13: A 22-year-old woman, suffered burn splash marks on the back of her right leg.
Victim 14: A 23-year-old man, sustained chemical burns, corneal injury with cloudiness in the right eye.
Victim 15: A 19-year-old woman, suffered chemical burns on her left leg.
Victim 16: A 23-year-old woman, suffered chemical burns, splash marks to left arm, shoulder and forehead.
WORLD EXCLUSIVE – Samantha Markle shares her thoughts on Prince Harry’s tittle-tattling tome ‘Spare’ with ‘The Steeple Times’; she slams it as likely “cold, malicious and reckless” and wishes he’d “spare us all the hypocritical pity party”
In comments exclusively to The Steeple Times via email, Ms. Markle observed:
“With regard to the book Spare, I have [like the rest of the planet, obviously] not read it [yet], but the idea that there was an alleged request or appeal for money between Harry and King Charles and when King Charles turned him down, reportedly he said he would go ahead with the book seems like extortion on the surface and blackmail.”
“We can only hope that the book will not be slanderous and scandalous, but after everything that has transpired it seems like such a cold, malicious and reckless disregard for his own family especially the father who has given him everything. Just like my father gave my sister everything, they seem to be two peas in a pod where using and disposing of others, when they don’t get their way is concerned. Some people are not capable of empathy remorse shame or gratitude.”
“In all of the pictures that were salient in the media throughout his life, Harry never seemed to be unhappy as a member of the royal family so [his] statement now does not intersect with visible evidence of a lifespan.”
“Many around the world have noticed the same thing. it almost seems like grasping for straws as a coping strategy for the discomfort of being in denial.”
“More than anything what is glaring is that while he posits the idea of mental health as being so important, neither he nor my sister seem to have any regard for the mental health of their families and others whom they have stepped on. They preach about peoples’ voices needing to be heard but they don’t care about the voices of those whom they have knowingly wronged. Their hypocrisy has been noted globally.”
“Prince William has honoured the legacy of his mother beautifully and carried on with integrity and loyalty. [He understands the concept of] role models [and the] importance of family. Prince Harry, on the other hand, seems to use the victim card as a crutch for accountability and integrity in every area of his life, in my opinion. I like the title of the book only in that maybe he should ‘spare’ us all the hypocritical pity party.”
Turning to her thoughts on the reaction to her interview yesterday with The Steeple Times, Ms. Markle concluded:
“This was an excellent article and I’m so grateful to you for your objective, honest overview.”
“Everyone else was afraid to tell the truth and an attorney in London told me that there was an entrenched media agenda against me. PRs were being paid to write nasty articles about me and everytime I would speak the truth, it never got printed.”
Pictured top – Samantha Markle (left); The Duke of Sussex’s book has already been embarrassingly reduced to the bargain basement bin at Waterstones – where it is priced at £14 down from £28 (centre); the mendacious menace, the Duchess of Sussex, will no doubt be less than amused to learn of the bookseller’s move and of her sibling’s latest comments.
With his tackily titled book already in the half-price bargain basement bin, the Duke of Sussex will likely to turn to the rotten weasel PR peddler Omid Scobie to help him flog a few extra copies.The Duke and Duchess of Sussex will no doubt also engage the vile trashbag troll Christopher Bouzy also. He was quite rightly called out by Samantha Markle yesterday and currently, very deservedly, also has legal troubles of his own.Another oddity the pair could turn to for assistance in PR-ing the pointless, pitiful book is Markus Anderson. A PR party or two at Soho House, perhaps?On Twitter, the half-sibling of the Duchess of Sussex slammed her and stated: “My grandmother would roll over in her grave to see what my sister has done to this family and I think it disgraces the family name. My dad worked very hard at his craft and did a sensational job, to give us the life that we had. #Markle.”Going further, Samantha Markle modestly added: “And like any family, we are not perfect, but we are far from what the media have portrayed us as and did not deserve that. It’s OK, what doesn’t kill you makes you stronger and we all know it gives us a great sense of humour!”
WORLD EXCLUSIVE – ‘The Steeple Times’ interviews Samantha Markle – the sensible sister of the mendacious meddler formerly known as Meghan Markle – as she returns to Twitter courtesy of Elon Musk’s reopening of the social media network
Samantha Markle, like her father, did not choose the glare of public spotlight. Forced into it courtesy of her heartless half-sister ‘bagging’ Prince Harry in 2019 and then treated like a pariah by this mendacious meddling actress turned international nuisance, here is a lady who, like many, got quite disgracefully deplatformed by the woke wazzocks who formerly controlled Twitter.
Now, courtesy of Elon Musk taking ownership in the last week, the elder sibling of the Duchess of Sussex has been quite justifiably allowed to return to the medium.
“Thank you so much Matthew! My dad is making good strides daily and that’s a blessing! Thank you for asking!”
“I am really happy to be on Twitter after being unjustly targeted and shut down by bots and trolls falsely reporting my account. Prior to that I was hacked out of several accounts, so they tried to spin information to look like I was circumventing.”
“Chris Bouzy and Twitter trolls bragged and took credit for getting me shut down.”
“The only time I was legitimately restricted on Twitter was for mentioning Ivermectin because I shared a medical article about it. Medical articles are not disinformation.”
“I’m glad that Elon musk is going to save free speech and [turn] Twitter into a greater platform than it has ever been. We can all have our opinions, and disagree. Elon Musk wants to make it fair for both the right and the left equally. Differing opinions and controversy make people think and grow.”
“If we all agreed, we would never grow. The free flow of information is critical to progress, and people should be allowed to process it independently rather than being censored or brainwashed.”
“I believe that this will be a historically positive change for our social and economic world. That free flow of information being taken out of the hands of the radically oppressive left will allow us to thrive as a society and as an economy. I think it’s going to be very exciting! I’d like to see Elon Musk buy Google!”
Somewhat controversially, before signing off, she added:
“And let’s not forget Donald Trump is going to get the world back on the right track.”
Watch out ‘MeGain’ – Your sensible sister Samantha was never going to be silenced and as much as you wish to spin out nonsense in Spare, the world will be watching and waiting as you yet again bring shame on the hapless House of Sussex.
The half-sister of the Duchess of Sussex now has her account back. We urge readers to join us in following her as she takes on a sibling whose antics are quite frankly nothing other than noxious.The two sisters pictured together in happier times. How different things could have been if Prince Harry’s wicked wife had simply included her birth family in the fold.Prince Harry’s wife is attempting to block her half-sister from deposing him and her father Thomas in her defamation lawsuit it was reported earlier this month. According to ‘Hello!’ earlier this month: “[Her legal team] have requested a judge stop the process of collecting and releasing evidence until a ruling on whether the lawsuit should be entirely thrown out. They argue that Meghan’s statements about her relationship with Samantha are ‘non-actionable opinion that are also substantially true… A deposition of Mr. Markle at this juncture, along with other discovery, would be an unnecessary spectacle and waste of the parties’ time, money, and resources,’ their filing read, via the publication. ‘[Samantha Markle] should not be permitted to force Meghan and, potentially, numerous non-parties to devote substantial resources to extraneous discovery while a meritorious motion that could dispose of the entire case is pending.’”
What’s the truth about the stories that abound about the Duchess of Sussex?
Of her claiming having got married the day before she actually did, Mr Markle stated: “Lying about the archbishop? How can you say: ‘We’ve been married three days before we got married’? Her lies are so obvious, I don’t know why she says them.”
Her very own half-sister, Samantha, who is currently bringing a defamation case against her, has called her out as a liar on multiple occasions also. It has been shown that the duchess’s claim that she hasn’t seen her sibling in over 20 years was proven untrue when a photo of the pair 13 years ago emerged.
Her very own half-brother, Thomas Jr., said of her: “I told Prince Harry, I think she’s going to ruin your life. She’s very shallow… She’s a phony, a bully, a jaded, shallow, conceited woman.”
The wife of Prince Harry has been called out on multiple occasions for spinning stories against other members of the royal family, most especially the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge.
Staff who’ve worked for her have complained that she is a bully and investigations into this remain ongoing.
The Duchess of Sussex is a known manipulator of the press and paparazzis and it has been claimed that she’ll “twist the truth” to get any headline she wants.
Questions remain as to how many times she’s actually been married in total. Some say twice, some say thrice.
Did the ‘Montecito Meddler’ meet Prince Andrew or Prince Harry first? Rumours abound that she could have spent time and holidayed with the former as long ago as 2001 and that her claim to have no prior knowledge of the royal family until 2016 is just utter baloney.
The moaning menace Duchess of Sussex’s claims that she was treated as a “bimbo” when working as a ‘briefcase girl’ just prove that she’s a blithering, blubbing bore
The mendacious menace formerly known as Meghan Markle just cannot help but play the victim.
In spite of living in a £14 million ($15.8 million, €16 million or درهم57.9 million) Montecito mansion most people could only dream of and having bagged a royal as her second – possibly third – husband, the Duchess of Sussex just cannot stop moaning and boy does she have the art of whining down to a tee.
In her latest tirade of tediousness, Prince Harry’s petulant partner told Paris Hilton on her Archetypes Spotify podcast that she was treated as a “bimbo” and not “valued specifically for her brain” whilst working on Deal or No Deal as a ‘briefcase girl.’
Yet again proving herself an attention seeker interested in only herself and not an interviewer interested in her subject, the petulant pest bored on:
“There was a very cookie-cutter idea of precisely what we should look like. It was solely about beauty – and not necessarily about brains. When I look back at that time, I’ll never forget this one detail: Moments before we’d get on stage, there was a woman who ran the show and she’d be there backstage, and I can still hear her. She couldn’t properly pronounce my last name at the time and I knew who she was talking to because she’d go, ‘Markle, suck it in! Markle, suck it in!’”
“And by the way, I was surrounded by smart women on that stage with me, but that wasn’t the focus of why we were there. I would end up leaving with this pit in my stomach knowing that I was so much more than what was being objectified on the stage. I didn’t like being forced to be all looks and little substance, and that’s how it felt for me at the time – being reduced to this specific archetype: the word ‘bimbo.’”
Predictably “me, me, me” in her manner, just as with her “me, me, me” speech in Manchester in September, here is a woman who’d do better to do just one thing. That thing? Learn the art of silence.
Twitter reacts to ‘Moaning Meg’ and brands her a total “bore”
What’s the truth about the stories that abound about the Duchess of Sussex?
Of her claiming having got married the day before she actually did, Mr Markle stated: “Lying about the archbishop? How can you say: ‘We’ve been married three days before we got married’? Her lies are so obvious, I don’t know why she says them.”
Her very own half-sister, Samantha, who is currently bringing a defamation case against her, has called her out as a liar on multiple occasions also. It has been proven that the duchess’s claim that she hasn’t seen her sibling in over 20 years was proven untrue when a photo of the pair 13 years ago emerged.
Her very own half-brother, Thomas Jr., said of her: “I told Prince Harry, I think she’s going to ruin your life. She’s very shallow… She’s a phony, a bully, a jaded, shallow, conceited woman.”
The wife of Prince Harry has been called out on multiple occasions for spinning stories against other members of the royal family, most especially the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge.
Staff who’ve worked for her have complained that she is a bully and investigations into this remain ongoing.
The Duchess of Sussex is a known manipulator of the press and paparazzis and it has been claimed that she’ll “twist the truth” to get any headline she wants.
Questions remain as to how many times she’s actually been married in total. Some say twice, some say thrice.
Did the ‘Montecito Meddler’ meet Prince Andrew or Prince Harry first? Rumours abound that she could have spent time and holidayed with the former as long ago as 2001 and that her claim to have no prior knowledge of the royal family until 2016 is just utter baloney.
Questions about the alleged former ‘yacht girl’ Duchess of Sussex’s involvement with Soho House director Markus Anderson have also been doing the rounds in recent days. The pair’s involvement with the pugnacious PR peddler Omid Scobie have also again surfaced.
Boo-hoo for cretinous crybaby queue jumper Phillip Schofield as the flogger of “plughole plonk” unsurprisingly gets booed at the National Television Awards
Rightly called out as a disgrace in September alongside his equally tedious This Morning co-host Holly Willoughby, smugger-than-smug flogger of “fit only for pouring down the plughole boxed wine” Phillip Schofield unsurprisingly got booed at the National Television Awards last night. They were at the OVO Arena in Wembley, London to accept the 2022 Best Daytime Award and surrounded by an audience of their peers.
Known best until he and Willoughby jumped the queues to pay respects to the late Queen as she lay in state in Westminster for laughable, lowbrow television, the “widespread backlash” against this overpaid pair of prattlers caused “concerns for the pair’s mental health” if you’d believe the MailOnline’s Brittany Chain and Sean O’Grady. If, however, you take the view of the majority of the populous into consideration instead, the public would simply rather these two tedious twerps were just taken off our telly boxes for once and for all.
Whilst Schofield and Willoughby’s bosses defended “queuegate” and expressed “serious concerns over their well-being,” it was made clear again last night that even those in their industry have also had quite enough of the audacious antics of this awful duo.
In response to the “outrageous scandal,” a Change.org petition started by a woman named Laura Harrison argued:
“Holly Willoughby and Phillip Schofield, two hosts of one of the most damaging to mental health day time TV shows This Morning, were able to push past those thousands and get immediate access [those waiting to pay their respects to the late Queen].”
“I’d like to see This Morning axed for good as I do believe it causes more harm than good, without people noticing. For example, like turning cost of living anxiety into a game show. At the least though, these presenters Holly and Phillip should finally be removed from our TV screens. They’ve monopolised way too long.”
“If you agree, please sign. If enough people sign we can show ITV that the public do matter. And these two don’t deserve our time.”
As of this morning at 11.30am, the total number of signatures to the petition had reached 79,000. It is time ITV paid attention to the public and axed not only This Morning’s Phillip Schofield and Holly Willoughby but also ridded their channel of the equally repugnant harpy hosts of the sexually salacious Loose Women.
Cretinous crybaby Schofield is an attention seeking berk who well and truly should be silenced for once and for all.Instead of skipping queues and upsetting the nation in the process, the all-round-angry man and ‘This Morning’ host and ex-sidekick of Gordon the Gopher should quit his ITV job and focus on improving his deservedly slammed boxed wines. He thought his red “perfect with olives” whilst the public thought it “better poured down the plughole.”Telly box legend Christine Hamilton showed her outrage for Phillip Schofield on 16th September when she highlighted how footballer David Beckham queued with the public whilst the ‘This Morning’ host “queue jumped.” She highlighted the lack of “special treatment” for the ex-England footballer with the ITV presenter’s arrogance and concluded: “Has he endured the privations of the queue? Has he hell. What in God’s name is he doing? Who the hell does he think he is?”Phillip Schofield was photographed Matthew McGreevy on a number of occasions. In 2020, various publications reported about the links between the two during the latter’s youth.
The temper tantrum prone television presenter with his ‘friend’ Mr McGreevy at a later date when they worked together. Whether they are still in contact or friends still even is unknown.Please sign our petition to get the equally repugnant ‘Loose Women’ axed from ITV. Started in 2018, it has yet to gain the traction of the ‘Axe Phillip Schofield and Holly Willoughby from TV’ on Change.org, but it deserves to now be revived. In it, at the time of launching it, Matthew Steeples stated: “ITV1’s ‘Loose Women’ celebrates all that is toxic about womankind. Their latest debacle, involving Coleen Nolan making Kim Woodburn cry on air, is indicative of how low this show stoops. On another occasion Judy Finnigan suggested the convicted rapist Ched Evans deserved to be allowed to return to playing football. There have been plenty of other examples involving Katie Price, Gloria Hunniford and Linda Robson that simply provide illustration of how tawdry this programme – screened when mothers are surely watching with young children – is. ITV – Do the decent thing. Axe ‘Loose Women.’”
Rotten-to-his-core convicted paedophile ‘entertainer’ Rolf Harris may have cancer, but his refusal to apologise to his multiple victims speaks volumes as to his continuing vileness
In August, it was announced that the nonagenarian nonce Rolf Harris would be featured in a forthcoming ITV documentary titled Hiding In Plain Sight, but now the perverted predator’s chums have bashed back. Ludicrously, these people of minds clearly stir-fried are attempting to garner sympathy for the sickening scumbag.
In an article for the Daily Mail Australia yesterday, the paper’s Kylie Stevens reported that the Bray, Berkshire based “disgraced entertainer” – who often used to love a nosh up at a curry house favoured by Theresa May in the locality – is, thankfully for those not keen on hearing his rip-roaringly awful renditions of the now clearly inappropriately titled Jake The Peg and Two Little Boys, “unable to speak and fed by tubes.”
“Battling neck cancer” according to “neighbours and friends” including one Portia Wooderson – who claimed: “He can’t eat anymore” – Stevens added that the author of Rolf Harris: The Defence Team’s Special Investigator Reveals the Truth Behind the Trials William Merritt whined: “He prefers to be on his own and ‘doesn’t particularly like kids’ as he ‘hates the noise.’”
Strangely, Merritt forgot to explain why this evil Tie Me Kangaroo Down Sport singing monster decided in February 2019 to “visit” the Oldfield Primary School in Maidenhead to “wave at children.” Curious that; very curious indeed.
Pictured top – Rabid ratbag Rolf Harris (left) with his dog. Supposedly his “health took a turn for the worse after the sudden death of his beloved poodle earlier this year” and (right) with his daughter repugnant daughter Bindi Nicholls and apologist niece Jenny Harris arriving at court in November 2017. It is an outrage that this arrogant cretin has more sympathy for a dead dog than his victims and that he penned a song called ‘Gutter Girls’ of them in 2015 is shocking though not surprising. Shame on him.
Should convicted paedophile Rolf Harris be forced to giving an apology to his victims or offered sympathy following news that this rotten-to-his-core abuser has cancer?
On Twitter this morning, Matthew Steeples asked: “Should convicted paedophile Rolf Harris be forced to giving an apology to his victims or offered sympathy following news that this rotten-to-his-core abuser has cancer?” The overwhelming response this far was a most certain “of course he should.”That the convicted child abuser paedophile Rolf Harris “hates the noise” of children seems most perplexing given his February 2019 visit to the Oldfield Primary School in Maidenhead, Berkshire to “wave” at children. One can only surmise that this noxious nonce doth protest too much.Lady May MP is often to be found dining with her ‘Garden Gnome-like’ hubby Sir Philip in Malik’s Tandoori House in Cookham, Berkshire. Here, the owner, is pictured serving her and also posing with another regular, her constituent and convicted paedophile Rolf Harris and his wicked wife Alwyn Hughes.The evil ‘entertainer’ was convicted in an era when justice was also done with the convictions of fellow paedophiles Stuart Hall and Max Clifford.The ironically titled given his ‘love of children’ and abusing them ‘Two Little Boys’ singer with the crackpot crazy creepy Christian crooner Sir Cliff Richard. Shouldn’t the Aussie paedophile have been deported after his release from jail in May 2017?Bizarrely there are still people out there who seek to defend and justify the twisted antics of this criminal sex offender. Amongst them are individuals going by the names of William B. Merritt and Mark Walker. The book by the former of the two, a private investigator, came out remarkably in May 2022 in paperback format and shockingly attempts to claim the Australian abuser innocent and his very much-deserved convictions “sinister.” Sickeningly Merritt goes as far to allege: “Harris had no chance. Rolf was an entertainer he was a kind, artistic man who had spent most of his relying on others to manage and organize his working life. He had no experience in the rough and tumble world.”In August this year, of the Australian nonce, one Twitter user, James Tryand, shared: “When I was a child, if we naughty in class, we were sent outside the classroom to stare at the wall. For one class, this involved staring at a picture drawn by Rolf Harris when visited the school, So, for me, he will always be associated with the punishment of children.”
‘Gutter Girls’ by Rolf Harris
In 2015, this audacious Australian abuser penned a sordid ‘song’ in which he described his multiple victims as “slimy little woodworms.” It should have been banned on grounds of obscenity and was sickly titled Gutter Girls.
It outrageously went as follows:
Climb up out of the woodwork babe
From forty years ago,
The climate’s great in Britain now
For making loads of dough
You’ve festered down there long enough,
Time’s right to grab your chance
Clap eyes on a rich celebrity
And make the bastard dance
Chorus
Make him squirm, slimy little woodworm
Make him squirm, squirm, squirm
Sink your claws right in to the hilt, don’t let him go
(Group) NO! NO!
Make him burn, burn, burn
Slimy little woodworm, make him burn
Get your fifty-years-old hooks into his dough
(Group) GO BABY GO
That old bandwagon you crawled out of
(rotten to the core)
Conceals a host of foul accusers,
Twenty maybe more
My guess is they’ll slide after you
All following your stench,
Perhaps you believe you’re pretty still
Some perfumed sultry wench
Chorus
“Make him squirm”,
I can hear you singing
“Make him squirm, squirm, squirm:
Just imagine all of the money waiting there”
(Group) OH YEAH!
Make him burn, burn, burn
Come and join the feeding frenzy girls,
Don’t miss out, come on and join me for your share
As the ‘Sussex Squad’ yet again get rightly called out on Twitter, shameless socialist Jeremy Corbyn bizarrely leaps to the multi-millionaire’s defence; with an unlikely friend like him, who needs enemies?
This morning, as is so often the case, the ‘Sussex Squad’ and their mistress-in-chief the Duchess of Sussex trended on Twitter. There is nothing surprising about that – given the public’s clear dislike for the meddling menace formerly known as Meghan Markle – but now, it seems, the wicked wench has gone and got herself an unlikely super-fan: Labour’s worst ever leader, Jeremy Corbyn.
Speaking to Aaron Bastani, the co-founder of the left-wing media organisation Novara Media, on Tuesday ‘Jezza’ remarked:
“I had very nice chats with Harry and Meghan… Very interesting, interesting. Harry’s life, Harry’s life has always been totally in the public eye, but a former serving officer and so on in the armed forces and Meghan, I think, is very interesting, a very clear-thinking woman, I’ve got a lot of time for her.”
“[She’s not been treated so badly] in the last few days, in the last few days it’s been alright for the last few days. They’ve been quite warm towards her, but she, erm, before that, I think the treatment of her has been appalling.”
“It’s led by the media wanting to, erm, I don’t know why, they just wanted to build her up into a negative figure, which she’s not. She is an intelligent, thoughtful woman.”
“I absolutely think there’s a racial component to it, absolutely, yeah. I do.”
“I mean, erm, who? Why? That’s speculation, but you know, she is a very able person and she’s got a great contribution to make and lots of radical ideas. She’s a good speaker, good, good.”
“I think that’s what the stress is [a career outside her marriage]… Well, the Duke of Edinburgh always called it ‘The Firm’ because they should be, click, like that. [She wasn’t up that]… NOPE! That’s what I understand, yeah.”
“Like that, where there’s any family stress, it’s very difficult to cope with. Look at it from the human point of view.”
Who’d have thought a far-left socialist and a woman living in a £14 million mansion in Montecito would end up besties? They say stranger things happen, but in this curious case they most certainly already have.
Who’d have thought a leftie like Jeremy Corbyn would want to become a mouthpiece for the meddling menace that is the woman formerly known as Meghan Markle? Perhaps this hypocritical toerag is angling for a holiday at her Montecito mansion?
What’s the truth about the stories that abound about the Duchess of Sussex?
Of her claiming having got married the day before she actually did, Mr Markle stated: “Lying about the archbishop? How can you say: ‘We’ve been married three days before we got married’? Her lies are so obvious, I don’t know why she says them.”
Her very own half-sister, Samantha, who is currently bringing a defamation case against her, has called her out as a liar on multiple occasions also. It has been proven that the duchess’s claim that she hasn’t seen her sibling in over 20 years was proven untrue when a photo of the pair 13 years ago emerged.
Her very own half-brother, Thomas Jr., said of her: “I told Prince Harry, I think she’s going to ruin your life. She’s very shallow… She’s a phony, a bully, a jaded, shallow, conceited woman.”
The wife of Prince Harry has been called out on multiple occasions for spinning stories against other members of the royal family, most especially the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge.
Staff who’ve worked for her have complained that she is a bully and investigations into this remain ongoing.
The Duchess of Sussex is a known manipulator of the press and paparazzis and it has been claimed that she’ll “twist the truth” to get any headline she wants.
Questions remain as to how many times she’s actually been married in total. Some say twice, some say thrice.
Questions remain also as to what engagement the duchess has had with meddlers such as Christopher Bouzy, Omid Scobie and her other ‘Sussex Squaddies’ and also as to what her deals with the likes of Netflix and Spotify involve her ‘spilling.’
Did the ‘Montecito Meddler’ meet Prince Andrew or Prince Harry first? Rumours abound that she could have spent time and holidayed with the former as long ago as 2001 and that her claim to have no prior knowledge of the royal family until 2016 is just utter baloney.
Boxed plonk selling plonker Philip Schofield outrages brilliantly bonkers ‘British Battleaxe’ Christine Hamilton by skipping the queue to pay respects to Her Majesty The Queen
Spectacularly right in her analysis of Schofield skipping the queue to pay respects to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II prior to her funeral on Monday, Hamilton was far from her alone in her anger at this warbling wazzock sticking two fingers up to members of the public who are now queuing for upto 24 hours to pass our wonderful former monarch for a moment whilst he just waltzed in.
Sanctimonious self-server Schofield, of course, has form. Condemned previously by Jonathan Dimbleby as “cretinous,” here is an overpaid television twerp who was laughed at as ludicrous in October 2020 for “making bizarre claims to have been murdered in a past life because of a debt” whilst promoting his “self-indulgent” ‘memoir’ Life’s What You Make Of It in an article in the Mirror.
At that time whilst desperately seeking any kind of publicity possible, the petulant and pompous This Morning presenter whined that he believed “he and an (imaginary) ‘family’ he’d plainly invented were murdered in a ‘past life’ over a debt.”
Showing himself as an utter crackpot, the definitely deranged flogger of wine condemned as “only fit for the bin” and “no more palatable than fizzy Ribena” declared:
“I opened the door to silence and felt horror wash over me. Three steps in, and I saw them – two murdered bodies on the floor.”
“I knew they were my wife and small child. Horror turned to fury. I knew why they were dead. I owed money to two brothers who worked at the end of the street in a sawmill.”
“The brother [then] found me, dragged me outside, punched me to the ground and, as my head hit the mud, he repeatedly stamped on it until I was dead!”
Behaving with dignity after a death is clearly something that this cretinous creep clearly hasn’t learnt. Shame on this ultimate television twerp; it is now time for Philip Schofield to offer an apology to the hundreds of thousands of people he pushed by without a shred of real respect.
Pictured top – Phillip Schofield looking angry whilst being noticed skipping the queue to pay respects to Her Majesty The Queen yesterday (left) and looking angry on the telly box on a previous occasion (right).
Telly box legend Christine Hamilton showed her outrage for Phillip Schofield yesterday when she highlighted how footballer David Beckham queued with the public whilst the ‘This Morning’ host “queue jumped.” She highlighted the lack of “special treatment” for the ex-England footballer with the ITV presenter’s arrogance and concluded: “Has he endured the privations of the queue? Has he hell. What in God’s name is he doing? Who the hell does he think he is?”In 2012, fellow television presenter Jonathan Dimbleby called out the ‘This Morning’ presenter as “cretinous” over his decision to present the then Prime Minister David Cameron with a list of names of alleged paedophiles during a live television segment. Mr Dimbleby concluded: “Grow up.”Instead of skipping queues and upsetting the nation in the process, the all-round-angry man and ‘This Morning’ host and ex-sidekick of Gordon the Gopher should focus on improving his deservedly slammed boxed wines. He thought his red “perfect with olives” whilst the public thought it “better poured down the plughole.”Phillip Schofield was photographed Matthew McGreevy on a number of occasions. In 2020, various publications reported about the links between the two during the latter’s youth.The temper tantrum prone television presenter with his ‘friend’ Mr McGreevy at a later date when they worked together. Whether they are still in contact or friends still even is unknown.
As the dopey Duchess of Sussex is derided for her “me, me, me” speech in Manchester, her pugnacious PR peddler Omid Scobie continues his cretinous campaign against her husband’s family
Today, as the new Prime Minister Liz Truss heads to Balmoral to see the Queen, it remains unknown as to whether her grandson Prince Harry and his wife – currently in Europe bigging themselves up in spite of the public clearly not wanting them present – will bother to do the same and pay a visit also.
In Düsseldorf today for the Invictus Games but said to be have “free time” tomorrow before being expected at the WellChild Awards in London on Thursday, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex were deservedly slammed by Gyles Brandreth yesterday on ITV’s This Morning programme.
Speaking of the dastardly duo, the much-loved veteran broadcaster and author declared: “The number of people being as sympathetic to them [the Sussexes] as they were initially does seem to be sort of thinning out a little bit… Once you make yourself the story, then you yourself become the story. What should be the story is the good works that you are doing… but, in fact, what we’re talking about is the family rift.”
Unsurprisingly, elsewhere the MailOnline’s Mark Duell referenced an intervention by Omid Scobie – who he termed “Meghan and Harry’s friend and trusted media partner” – in which the feckless Finding Freedom ‘author’ laughably claimed: “This is very much about the work [that the couple] wanted to do ever since they stepped back.” The leading “Sussex Squaddie” and all-round troll did, however, fail to mention what role paymasters’ Netflix and Spotify would play in the charade and also neglected to justify his continuing campaign against other members of Prince Harry’s family.
Turning to the speech to 2,000 young people in Manchester yesterday by the Duchess of Sussex, The Sun’s Sarah Grealish reported on a “Meg-A Snub” and shared news of the former Suits actress and her drippy husband being “booed and branded ‘fake royals’ by [the] crowd on [their] ‘me, me, me’ mini-tour.” The duchess referenced herself an astonishing 54 times during her 7-minute “nonsensical” tirade before the assembled gathering at the One Young World youth gala.
Grealish added that the couple were faced with “anti-royal placards” and “one woman accused Meghan of being a ‘liar and a hypocrite’ and of launching an ‘attack’ on the royal family.” Another, “Janet from Manchester” is said to have added: “She’s a fake humanitarian and a fake feminist. She’s a social climber… She thought she could be a celebrity in the royal family and she’s the most toxic, divisive woman I’ve ever heard of in my life.”
Pictured top – Plastic-not-anything-but-fantastic PR peddler not-a-journalist Omid Scobie (left) and his delusional puppet mistress, the Duchess of Sussex (right) yesterday in the north of England.
The ‘Montecito Meddler’ turned up looking like a scarlet woman to give her speech yesterday. It was met with derision given it was just about herself rather than inspiring to the young people who’d paid upto £1,000 to be present.On Twitter, Jimmy Failla of ‘Fox Across America’ called out the Duchess of Sussex and remarked of her: “It takes a special kind of stupid to claim women are being held back on the SAME DAY they name a Female Prime Minister” in the United Kingdom.Meanwhile this morning, after the ‘Daily Mail’s’ Richard Eden referenced “charity clearly [starting] at home for mother and daughter” behind the One Young World charity – after ‘The Sun’ reported that Kate Robertson and her daughter Ella Robertson McKay took home £634,494 in pay between them last year in spite of the pandemic, ‘The Steeple Times’s’ editor Matthew Steeples expressed surprise that “Chanel-clad” Baroness Meyer – who Eden had previously called out for her “charitable” antics” – had not got in on the act.The second son of Prince Charles and his late former wife Diana, Princess of Wales were told they were “fake royals” and to “f**k off” by one placard waving protestor. Another added: “[‘MeGain’] has used every card she can – racism, mental health, feminism. She’s not a feminist, she’s just a hypocrite.”As the duo arrived at the Bridgewater Hall, they were booed and jeered from behind barriers by an angry mob. Their demand for a “ring of steel” security curtain to shield them from such did nothing except draw further attention to how much the British public truly dislike their audacious antics.The couple’s popularity has plunged further and further into the quagmire in recent months. Nobody is surprised about that and they’re most certainly up there with non-sweating friend of child abusing sex traffickers Prince Andrew in the very, very disliked stakes.
What’s the truth about the stories that abound about the Duchess of Sussex?
Of her claiming having got married the day before she actually did, Mr Markle stated: “Lying about the archbishop? How can you say: ‘We’ve been married three days before we got married’? Her lies are so obvious, I don’t know why she says them.”
Her very own half-sister, Samantha, who is currently bringing a defamation case against her, has called her out as a liar on multiple occasions also. It has been proven that the duchess’s claim that she hasn’t seen her sibling in over 20 years was proven untrue when a photo of the pair 13 years ago emerged.
Her very own half-brother, Thomas Jr., said of her: “I told Prince Harry, I think she’s going to ruin your life. She’s very shallow… She’s a phony, a bully, a jaded, shallow, conceited woman.”
The wife of Prince Harry has been called out on multiple occasions for spinning stories against other members of the royal family, most especially the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge.
Staff who’ve worked for her have complained that she is a bully and investigations into this remain ongoing.
The Duchess of Sussex is a known manipulator of the press and paparazzis and it has been claimed that she’ll “twist the truth” to get any headline she wants.
Questions remain as to how many times she’s actually been married in total. Some say twice, some say thrice.
Did the ‘Montecito Meddler’ meet Prince Andrew or Prince Harry first? Rumours abound that she could have spent time and holidayed with the former as long ago as 2001 and that her claim to have no prior knowledge of the royal family until 2016 is just utter baloney.
