As ghastly, gobby and grim Darren Grimes gets axed by GB News, we call for the complete cancellation of a bombastic Brexit bore known best for pulling a Diane Abbott in wearing mismatching footwear
Self-declared “Northerner that says it how it is” Darren Grimes fits into the same category as Tom Harwood, Owen Jones and Omid Scobie in terms of being considered utterly irksome. With his nasty nasal twang and a Priti Patel-like use of language when he’s “scramblin’,” “wavin’” and “invadin’,” here is a tedious twerp who made even right-wing viewers of GB News turn off.
Now “abruptly cancelled” – according to Wikipedia – by GB News, Liberal Democrat turned right-wing Brexiteer Grimes took to Twitter on 4th November and declared:
“Sadly, my GB News show, Real Britain, is ending in a few weeks. I want to make its last few episodes on air the best of all. Thank you from the bottom of my heart to those who have loyally tuned in and supported me and the channel – it has been the greatest ride of my life!”
Responding on the social media network, most were unsympathetic of the plight of this County Durham born 29-year-old. One observed that GB News had “caused distress to his one viewer” whilst another added: “Good riddance to @Darren_Grimes: A vile racist and sh*t stirrer. May they all tumble, one after the other.”
Whilst Christine Hamilton proved herself a lone voice of support in stating: “You will be much missed” and adding “you will succeed whatever,” the cancellation of the founder of the since disgraced BeLeave campaign is something that has unsurprisingly been widely celebrated. It is now simply time for something else and that is to banish dimwitted Darren Grimes to Siberia for once and for all.
Pictured top – Darren Grimes (left) on a beach with what appears to be a small man running up his arm and a “coming soon” sign behind him; mockery of this “half-witted t***er” is unsurprisingly widespread on social media (right).
Rather like Diane Abbott, here is a tedious twerp who doesn’t appear able to match his footwear. Pictured at his beloved Newcastle United Football Club in a white shoe and a black shoe, Grimes has also been repeatedly subjected to widescale discussion of what he used to get upto whilst in the classroom as a child in year nine. “I’m not messing about,” he whimpered before not doing anything about his accusers.
Mocked widely on social media channels, the now axed GB News presenter is nothing but a disaster and a joke.
The diatribe of drivel that came from the mouth of ‘Grim Grimes’ clearly made viewers of even the right-wing news channel GB News turn off. His “I’m English and I’m damn well proud to be so” message didn’t even resonate with Brexiteers and BNP and EDL fanatics and now it is time that he was simply cancelled permanently.
Darren Grimes on Twitter…
Though he thought his time presenting ‘Real Britain’ the “greatest ride of my life!” the viewing public clearly felt otherwise and hence GB News unsurprisingly axed this very boring berk.His Twitter handle speaks volumes… “Media personality” is hardly the way someone with a viewing audience of just the “mam” he bangs on about so much would be described by anyone with half-a-brain.Though ‘Dim Dazzer’ seems to find most of his ‘fans’ on Twitter, he slammed it on the 6th November with the remark: “You virtue signaling cesspit.”On the 5th November also, one of his videos was unsurprisingly removed from TikTok after it was deemed to be “hate speech.”Trying to make out he’d actually had messages offering him “support and encouragement,” on the 5th November ‘Dopey Darren’ declared: “Don’t worry, I’m not going to stop making videos! I’ll be on your screens in some format!” God help the viewing public if that proves true.Returning to type a day later, the opinionated oaf took his fury out on those calling him out and childishly branded someone who’d condemned him as “Mr Britain-loathing Liberal Democrat.”This morning, very predictably, the now axed presenter got very, very, very upset over the cancellation of Boris Johnson’s pet project ‘royal yacht’ replacement by Rishi Sunak’s government. “Could it be that the left just doesn’t like anything associated with Britain?” he whined.
Reaction to ‘Crafty W*nk’ being cancelled and removed from television screens…
As respected BBC News and Sky News journalist Simon McCoy slams the “hypocrisy” of Omid Scobie for “trashing” real journalists, we remind ‘MeGain’s Mouthpiece’ that he is nothing but a pathetic PR peddler whilst the Duchess of Sussex’s very own sister Samantha Markle claims him to be “throwing out red herrings to deflect from the truth”
Omid Scobie doesn’t like making friends in the press; actually, he doesn’t like making friends full stop. Though he attempts to pretend to be a real journalist, he’s now being called out by real journalists and yesterday respected former BBC News and Sky News newsreader Simon McCoy became the latest to slam the tittle-tattling Finding Freedom ‘author.’
On Sunday, McCoy – who married the Dynasty star Emma Samms MBE in 2021 – politely tweeted: “Dear Omid, if I may. Your hypocrisy is astounding. You are no better than those of us who tried – honestly – to report on the Royal Family for years. But you apparently know better. Stop trashing those of us who have been this profession for a while. We see you.”
Responding to his comments, Twitter users subsequently told McCoy: “Shout it from the rooftops” and “he’s not a reporter, he’s a paid shrill.” One claimed: “Scoobie [sic] really is the pits!” whilst another added: “He knows zilch.” Labels of “trash media” and “he’s thick” came of the Duchess of Sussex’s PR peddler also and someone going by the handle ‘Juju Bean’ surmised: “He only speaks when Markle has something to say and gives him permission to say it.”
Sensibly, another account in the name of one Audrey Johnson concluded: “If @scobie titles himself as a ‘royal journalist,’ I’m the bloody Queen of Sheba. He is under some kind of illusion that the British public are stupid! We are well aware he is MM’s mouth piece, what she orders him to report he reports!!”
Elsewhere, corresponding via email with The Steeple Times over the weekend further to her exclusive interviews with us last week, the mendacious menace formerly known as Meghan Markle’s very own sister, Samantha Markle, poignantly observed:
“It seems Omid Scobie is in denial and throwing out red herrings to deflect from the truth and what transpired [when Meghan Markle embarked on joining the royal family].”
“No one can say she didn’t know what to expect from royal life because her PR made it clear that she went through ‘duchess school.’ She knew what the expectations were, and what the protocol was.”
“It was reported that she only spent 72 days total in royal duty before quitting to allegedly pursue a life in ‘Hollywood.’ Not surprisingly, she never gave up her agent and manager in Hollywood, or her citizenship.”
“Could leaving have been a plan from the beginning? Omid Scobie was also noted as being a close personal friend, so perhaps he knew about it.”
“I think Omid Scobie’s credibility has been called into question several times especially after he allegedly admitted that Megan lied in the Oprah interview.”
“All things taken together, it seems that it’s not that they didnt accept her, but it seems more the case that she didn’t like rules, truth and protocol, and it seems like she wanted to jump to the top of the hierarchy after only putting in 72 days of royal duty.”
“Maybe what they couldn’t accept was the constant breaking of protocol, disrespect, and the lying. Who can blame them for feeling betrayed and not accepting that? But apparently Omid Scobie can’t seem to wrap his brain around the fact that betrayal and dishonesty have consequences.”
Pictured top – Twitter users really dislike the ‘Finding Freedom’ author and regularly create memes of his plastic not fantastic face.
Allegations have swirled in recent months that the woman then known as Meghan Markle spent time on yachts in 2012 and in the years before. Here is a picture of her with someone alleged to be Omid Scobie in Cannes around that time. If the man in the sunglasses is genuinely the ‘Finding Freedom’ author, it is one of the only known photographs in the public domain of the pugnacious pair together. One is left asking: “If they are as close as Scobie likes to brag and boast, why do they avoid being seen in public together?”
Twitter responds to Omid Scobie’s diatribe of drivel about what he claims to know about Prince Harry’s disgraceful diatribe of drivel that is his forthcoming tittle-tattling tome ‘Spare’…
That motormouthed MP Diane Abbott took to Twitter to defend a migrant rapist simply shows her as an utter twerp; perhaps, instead, she should focus on controlling her own son – a brat who likes to go around exposing himself –instead first
In January 2020, Diane Abbott MP’s son, James Abbott-Thompson, was charged with nine assaults, exposure and racially aggravated criminal damage. By March that year, aside from having exposed himself, this then 28-year-old had also spat at and punched one police officer and bitten the thumb of another, yet now his mother thinks she can wade into the migrant crisis and share her views on alleged sexual assaults.
Ms Abbott, a woman well known to be of mind stir-fried, took to Twitter last week and announced: “Teenage boy raped at hotel housing refugees. Terrible case. But it is what happens when you demonise migrants take NO responsibility for safeguarding migrant children.”
Going further in spite of very rightly being condemned for sharing such a glaringly inappropriate and morally repugnant excuse for rape, she continued: “My earlier tweet regarding the rape of the teenager in the migrant home may have been slightly raw in context but I maintain my theory, you treat migrants like rapists then they are going to behave like rapists.”
Strangely, this mother of a clearly wayward wastrel, then deleted the second tweet. Strange that, very strange indeed; shame on Diane Abbott and shame on all those who’ve subsequently come out and excused her wicked words.
The weird, weird words of the Labour Member of Parliament for Hackney North and Stoke Newington
On the ex-Labour leader, who she used to ‘enjoy’ sexual relations with, Jeremy Corbyn:
“Jeremy is always right.”
On his replacement as Labour leader (but not as her lover, allegedly) Sir Keir Starmer MP:
“Talks nonsense… Is quite strange.”
“On the question of Keir Starmer, I think we have to look at some of his advisors. It now seems that Peter Mandelson is a top advisor to Keir Starmer.”
“We only have to look at Peter Mandelson’s life and times to understand where he stands in relation to the wealthy and the powerful.”
“I think Keir Starmer’s problems are his advisors and he needs to be listening to his own party and grass roots party members more.”
“Keir Starmer’s people are spinning it, but in 2017, people forget you know, Jeremy got more votes than any other Labour leader and, you know, if he hadn’t had most of the PLP attacking him night and day, he might possibly have won in 2017.”
Responding to be accused of not being able to add up:
“I do know my figures.”
“Of course, I think things through.”
“I’m here, of course I’m here. I’m doing a media interview, I’m going on to do another media interview. There’s no truth that I’m not in the media talking about what happened.”
“I think I’m Shadow Home Secretary.”
Diane Abbott on the cost of recruiting 10,000 police officers:
“If we recruit 10,000 police officers, men and women, over a four year period, we believe it will be about £300,000… Sorry, I mean, they will cost, it will cost, erm, about £80 million.”
“We will be paying them the average, it’s been thought through. Of course it’s been thought through.”
“What we said is, of course, we’ll find the money to recruit the 10,000 police people by cutting the, cutting the money… I think that would give us 170, erm, sorry… We would find the money by restoring levels of capital gains tax.”
On racism:
“The British invented racism.”
“White people love playing divide and rule. We should not play their game… I don’t think saying that is racist… It was part of a sequenced debate that I said that.”
“We need unity between black, Asian, minority ethnic and Muslim people – we need the maximum public show of unity. Because time after time, in the past 32 years, I’ve seen efforts of people to organise disrupted by white people.”
On dogs:
“I was a postman one Christmas and I developed a morbid fear of dogs.”
On her own marriage:
“I wanted my marriage to work, but it didn’t.”
On “outsiders” and “insiders”:
“Outsiders often have an insight than an insider doesn’t quite have.”
On being an MP:
“Being an MP is a good job, the sort of job all working-class parents want for their children – clean, indoors and no heavy lifting. What could be nicer?”
“I want power. I suppose that’s the story of my life – seeking power.”
“I’m in politics to be a voice for people who don’t have a voice.”
On the Kurdistan Workers’ Party:
“There is no difference between the PKK and ISIS.”
On the vile piece of toerag and one-time friend of Ghislaine Maxwell and the late croaked paedophile Jeffrey Epstein that is Naomi Campbell:
“I am a fangirl of Naomi Campbell.”
On why she wanted to be Labour’s candidate to be Mayor of London:
“One of my advantages, if I was Labour’s candidate, is that loads of people know me. I’m not just talking about politics – they’ve seen me on Come Dine With Me, they’ve seen me on Pointless.”
“I am not associated with the past.”
On women in Northern Ireland:
“Women in Northern Ireland are second class citizens.”
Diane Abbott on supporting the IRA:
“Defeat for the British state would be a great liberation. A defeat in Northern Ireland would be a defeat indeed.”
On supposedly changing her views on supporting the IRA:
“It was 34 years ago, I had a rather splendid afro at the time. I don’t have the same hairstyle, I don’t’ have the same views. It was 34 years on. The hairstyle is gone, some of the views are gone.”
On supposedly changing her views about MI5:
“At that time, I and a lot of people felt MI5 needed reforming. It has since been reformed and, of course, I would not call for its abolition now. That MI5 has gone. It’s been reformed, it’s a different MI5 and that’s why so many of us are able to support it now.”
Diane Abbott on Mao Zedong:
“I suppose some people will judge that on balance Mao did more good than harm… He led his country from feudalism, he helped to defeat the Japanese and he left his country on the verge of the great economic success they are having now. I was just putting the case for Mao.”
Insulting white mothers:
“West Indian mums will go to the wall for their children.”
On being a mother:
“I put being a mother ahead of being a politician.”
On the son she sent to a private school, who went on to commit various criminal offences:
“I knew what could happen to my son if he was sent to the wrong school and got in with the wrong crowd.”
On abortion:
“Abortion is an issue of conscience for the Labour party.”
“I believe every abortion is a tragedy.”
Diane Abbott on sex:
“Of course, sex is great. We don’t have to pretend otherwise.”
On masculinity:
“There is a crisis of masculinity in Britain because of the pressures rapid economic and social change have placed on masculine identity. A generation of men are in transit and unclear of their social role. They are also under pressure to live up to pornified ideals.”
Diane Abbott on her decision to send her criminal son to a private school:
“[It was] indefensible and intellectually incoherent.”
“I’m not the only Labour MP who sent their child to public school, but I’m the only one who’s questioned about it.”
On parenting:
“When fast food is not a treat but a dietary staple, the children surf the Internet all day in dark corners of the room and are bombarded with the latest gadgets. Things replace parental standards.”
“Tackling obesity is key… Families are struggling against a tide of junk information on junk food.”
On being demoted to the backbenches:
“I was a backbencher for a few years and there is an awful lot to do on the backbenches.”
On her political strategy:
“[I am going to stop Labour going into a] dead end.”
“In politics, the people I most despise are those who have no values.”
On defending the indefensible:
“You can’t defend the indefensible. Anything you say sounds self-serving and hypocritical.”
On her many mistakes:
“You learn from your mistakes.”
On her future plans:
“I want to write a best-selling book.”
On being intensely disliked:
“[I am the] most abused of any Labour MP ever.”
And a final word from Diane Abbott herself:
“This is going round in circles… I’ve got nothing more to say, I’ve got nothing more to say.”
One of several recent tweets by the Labour Member of Parliament for Hackey North and Stoke Newington that rightly enraged members of the public. With a mouth larger than China and more front than Harrods, here, yet again, is just another example of why this ridiculous woman is totally unfit for high office.
Twitter reacts to Jeremy Corbyn’s former lover @HackneyAbbott making a twerp of herself yet again on Twitter…
As Omid Scobie claims that drippy Prince Harry’s ‘Spare’ will reveal “the real truth” about him and his mendacious menace wife ‘MeGain,’ we say: Please spare us
“Unless I’m missing something, what really would be a revelation would be for Harry to admit that, all things considered, he’s led a rather cushy, privileged life and if one of the worst things that happened to him was that he was born only second in line to the throne, then he might have done better not to have taken a reported £20 million for a four-book deal – does anyone want to read Harry on leadership and wellness? – and to have sucked it up and not made such a fuss” remarked John Crace this morning in The Guardian in his ‘Digested Week’ column.
Quite right in his analysis, Crace hit the nail bang on the head, yet elsewhere yesterday the House of Sussex’s always predictably toady tin-banging twerp Omid Scobie decided to claim “the media’s got it all wrong about Prince Harry’s memoir.” Doing as he was no doubt told, as he always does when the mendacious menace formerly known as Meghan Markle no doubt put in a call, this PR peddler went further and declared to his extremely limited Yahoo! News UK audience: “Here’s the real truth.”
Whilst anyone with a quarter of a brain would admit that senseless Scobie wouldn’t know “truth” it gnawed him repeatedly in the arse, the Finding Freedom ‘author’ whined about the “angered reactions” to the forthcoming diatribe of drivel that is Spare and suggested the media were claiming “quelle surprise, ‘all Meghan’s doing.’”
Lauding the title of the tittle-tattling tome as a “punchy choice,” the unsophisticated former Heat gossip columnist and onetime mate of glamour ‘model’ Jodie Marsh continued his arse licking and declared:
“So far, only the smallest official details about the book’s 416 pages have been released by the publisher. They describe SPARE as a title written with ‘raw, unflinching honestly,’ a book that is filled with ‘insight, revelation, self-examination, and hard-won wisdom.’ I’d expect nothing less from prolific ghostwriter J. R. Moehringer, who is famous for encouraging his subjects to switch on the lights in the darkest parts of their story.”
Going further and bragging that he’s allegedly already seen the finished product, Scobie added:
“Among those who have already had sight of the book’s manuscript, Harry’s journey of being the spare, plus that difficult decision to change his destiny and start a new life elsewhere, serve as significant parts of the book. Filled with the prince’s trademark cheekiness, this memoir also tells a surprisingly relatable life story. Sure, its opulent royal backdrop is far beyond a world any of us will ever know, but themes explored in SPARE should resonate with readers from all backgrounds.”
“For all the tabloid reports about Harry supposedly ‘trashing’ his family (spoiler alert: he doesn’t), the book actually offers a more sympathetic look at the realities of their near-impossible existence. There were also no last-minute rewrites or edits after the Queen’s death. SPARE’s manuscript was completed almost five months before the monarch’s passing, a detail that will be acknowledged in a note at the start of the book.”
“Hundreds of journalists, including myself, have written versions and fragments of the duke’s story over the years. It’s a story that, as a working member of the Royal Family, he has long been unable to tell himself. Now, having created an independent life away from the confines of the royal institution, Harry finally has the chance to set often-inaccurately reported records straight. The freedom of speech. And no matter how you may feel about the man, it’s hard not to agree he should have the right to that.”
Elsewhere this week, speaking exclusively to The Steeple Times, the wicked wench formerly known as Meghan Markle’s somewhat more sensible sister, Samantha, declared of Spare: “’Spare’ us all the hypocritical pity party.” She is right and this book deserves only one thing; pulping.
Pictured top – Twitter users unsurprisingly loathe and detest the mouthpiece of the Duchess of Sussex and mocked his ‘Finding Freedom’ as ‘Finding French Fries’ recently.
Attempting to move the story onto his never-sorry-self, the ‘Finding Freedom’ PR peddling pillock shared news about how he’d been on the stage at Web Summit 2023 in Lisbon. He tweeted: “This year’s @WebSummit was the first to include stages focused on media, publishing and journalism so I was excited to be invited to speak, share stories, and discuss some of the challenges our industries are facing (from cancel culture to misinformation) and how to tackle them.” It was a shame he didn’t share that he’s the queen of misinformation himself.In August 2020, the ‘Daily Mail’ shared that plastic-not-fantastic Omid previously worked at gossip magazine ‘Heat’ and partied with the ‘glamour model’ Jodie Marsh. They mentioned how somebody had “airbrushed” Meghan Markle’s “entry on the online encyclopedia Wikipedia… to include more flattering details days before her romance with Prince Harry became public” and illustrated the ‘Finding Freedom’ author’s “drastic transformation” in two very different photographs. Maniac Scobie is someone who most definitely would like his past forgotten, but here again we remind him that he’s actually just a two-faced twerp who spins nothing but nonsense.
Twitter reacts to Scobie’s diatribe of nonsense about Prince Harry’s nonsensical ‘Spare’…
Immigrant hater Natalie Elphicke OBE MP should be reminded that she, the wife of a convicted sex offender, is the noxious nasty who actually deserves to be hated
In March this year, The Steeple Times slammed the “total plonker” Conservative Member of Parliament for Dover, Natalie Elphicke, over her pathetic handling of the sacking of 800 P&O ferry workers by Zoom after she deservedly got heckled at a protest in support of their rights.
Previously, Dover had been the domain of her husband, Charlie – a cretinous creep known for running around the marital home yelling: “I’m a naughty Tory” as he went about groping horrified visiting ladies. Mr Elphicke was subsequently thrown in the slammer in July 2020 after being convicted of three counts of sexual assault against two women.
In today’s column, which was titled: “When will The Left admit this is no refugee crisis… but simply illegal immigration,” Mrs Elphicke blamed everyone but her own party for refugees landing daily on British shores. “They are not fleeing wars,” she raged, before adding: “The injustice affects everyone… Not that you’d know it from the handwringing rights industry, the charity sector and the skewed reporting of the issue from the Left-wing media and the BBC.”
Instead of seeking a solution on British shores, this heartless multi-millionaire mother-of-two simply offered: “It is undoubtedly the case that more can be done in France” before demanding “an immediate solution.” Idealistic, yes, realistic no and achievable, most definitely not.
Frankly, all this latest column does is to provide further indication that here is an impractical woman unfit to represent the 72,000 people of her constituency. It is now jolly well time for ‘Nasty Nat’ to finally do the decent thing – resign and make way for someone who might actually help work towards a solution to this very real problem; a very real problem that affects both those arriving in Britain and those already living in Dover and beyond.
Immigrant hater Natalie Elphicke OBE MP turned up to court regularly with her husband during his trial for sexual assault. She openly supported him and smiled for the cameras willingly alongside him, but as soon as he was convicted she took £25,000 from ‘The Sun’ for a negative story about him. Just days later, she changed her mind yet again and claimed her criminal hubby had been punished for being “charming, wealthy and successful – attractive, and attracted to, women.” She dismissed the claims of his accusers as nonsense and then, along with four other MPs (Sir Roger Gale, Theresa Villiers, Adam Holloway and Bob Stewart), were censored for using parliamentary notepaper to improperly pestering the judiciary with “naughty notes” trying to get the rotten sex offender off in November 2020. Here is a woman incapable of making up her mind and sticking to a single belief; here is a woman wholeheartedly unfit to be a Member of Parliament.
I came across a discarded small boat on the beach in Dover earlier.
Many more illegal arrivals again today.
We must get a grip on the small boats crisis and stop boats like this arriving on our shores. pic.twitter.com/8y7bvapk0q
Yesterday, the MP shared a video in a tweet caption: “I came across a discarded small boat on the beach in Dover earlier. Many more illegal arrivals again today. We must get a grip on the small boats crisis and stop boats like this arriving on our shores.” Instead of telling those poor souls seeking asylum to “get a grip,” she ought first to “get a grip” and deal with the continuing fallout from her husband’s convictions and her efforts to clear this filthy pervert’s rotten name.
Twitter reacts to the Member of Parliament for Dover’s latest antics…
Matthew Steeples suggests mouthy ex-MP Emma Dent Coad’s latest moan about how Labour have ditched her as a future candidate show her for what she is; a sore loser and a far-left hectoring harridan
Ten days ago, ex-MP for Kensington Emma Dent Coad – a hectoring harridan with a penchant for using the block button on Twitter to anyone who dares calls out her diatribe of drivel – issued a statement after she was excluded from being on Labour’s longlist of prospective candidates for the next election.
At the time, the far-left royal hater whined that she was “devastated” and “angry.” She moaned also that her party had “unjustly” prevented her from “standing for the seat I won just five years ago, the seat I came agonisingly close to holding even in 2019, despite the trade union backing which should have seen me longlisted automatically.” The now 67-year-old had won in 2017 by just 20 votes over Tory Lady ‘Call me Victoria’ Borwick and lost by 150 in 2019 to Felicity ‘Flicka’ Buchan, also a Conservative.
Speaking to the Communist Morning Star, a Momentum spokesperson added:
“It is a travesty of justice that passionate, popular advocates for their community like Emma are being blocked en-masse by Keir Starmer’s Labour on spurious grounds, so loyalists from outside the area can be parachuted in.”
“This is a deeply damaging episode for the Labour Party in Kensington, and one that local people are unlikely to forget.”
Instead now, if Labour actually want to make headway given Rishi Sunak somewhat steadying the Conservatives in just a few days in office, it is time that the party woke up and smelt the markets. The days of trade unionism and Jeremy Corbyn are dead; Britain needs a centrist opposition that genuinely opposes, but one that actually works with business rather than supports strikes against it.
Pictured top: Jeremy Corbyn apologist Owen Jones and Emma ‘Dense’ Dent Coad – a footnote in history who (along with Jones) has blocked ‘The Steeple Times’ on Twitter; here is a woman who plainly cannot cope with any discussion where she’s not hectoring all others.
Here is a privileged Kensington resident – who was married to Sir Hadley Gregory D’Oyly, 15th Baronet from 1978 to 1972 – who likes to play the card that she’s a woman of the people. She’s incapable of dialogue with anyone who doesn’t totally agree with her and simply blocks that dares question her on Twitter.The far-left, Corbynite socialist councilor for the Globorne ward of the Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Council since 2006 is proud to be trade union backed and also has a book just out that she clearly wants to promote and profiteer from.
Dent Coad’s statement in full:
I am devastated that the Labour Party has blocked me from standing to once again represent my community in Parliament, the community I have spent the last 20 years of my life fighting for.
At the same time, I am angry that local members and our local community in Kensington have been denied the opportunity to vote in a free and fair contest, which has been sacrificed for the sake of factional intrigue from Labour officials.
This campaign has never been about me. I stood to offer dedicated representation for the people of Kensington in Parliament, from someone who knows and cares for our communities.
From my role as a local councillor and Labour Group leader, to my campaigning efforts as Kensington’s MP on housing issues so dear to our hearts, I have only ever sought the chance to champion our people, whose voices all too often go unheard.
If I have been outspoken in my politics, it is due to my passion and care for Kensington – for my neighbours and friends – and because of my burning desire to stamp out injustice and build a fairer, more equal society.
Upsettingly, unaccountable Labour officials have exploited this outspokenness to unjustly prevent me from standing for the seat I won just five years ago, the seat I came agonisingly close to holding even in 2019, despite the trade union backing which should have seen me longlisted automatically.
It is plain as day that the candidate selection process now being run by the Party is being factionally abused and is not fit for purpose.
I deplore injustice, and through my 16 years on the Council, various reports and my recent book, ‘One Kensington’ I have done my utmost not only to draw attention to the very real inequalities in our community but to actively fight it, from the council chamber to the House of Commons.
Above all, my driving ambition has been to combat the inequality which scars our community, the systematic disregard for working-class people which led to the atrocity of the Grenfell Tower fire, and which has led many to lose faith with the political process.
These people deserve and need representation in Parliament. I hope that Labour’s eventual candidate will gain the respect and trust of all communities in Kensington. It won’t be easy.
Solidarity,
Emma
The ex-Labour MP for Kensington’s full statement. It clearly illustrates her lack of respect for democracy and how she is instead totally unfit to be a Member of Parliament again. In October 2019 whilst still an MP, she was forced to apologise after liking a Facebook post that claimed: Israel “disgraces all of us Jews worldwide,” according to the ‘Jewish News.’
The Just Stop Oil ‘protestors’ who attacked a Van Gogh yesterday should be branded as what they truly are: Moronic vandals; that their organisation is funded by a member of the Getty family is even more outrageous
Vexatious vicenarians Anna Holland and Phoebe Plummer are due at Westminster Magistrates’ Court today after being charged with criminal damage to Vincent Van Gogh’s ‘Sunflowers’ (1888) oil painting at the National Gallery in London.
At 11am yesterday, these Just Stop Oil ‘protestors’ (as they’d like to brand themselves; we’ll instead term them ‘brainless vandals’) entered Room 43 at the gallery and threw an orange substance believed to be Heinz tomato soup at the painting. They then glued themselves to the wall beneath it and started shouting.
The pink haired half of this deranged pair of deviants launched into what Metro termed a “rambling tirade” and ranted:
“What is worth more, art of life? Is it worth more than food, worth more than justice?”
“Are you more concerned about the protection of a painting or the protection of our planet and people?”
“The cost of living crisis is part of the cost of oil crisis. Fuel is unaffordable to millions of cold, hungry families. They can’t even afford to heat a tin of soup.”
“We cannot afford more oil and gas. It is going to take everything we know and love. We will [unintelligible]…”
At this point security guards cleared the room to spare other visitors listening to these attention-seeking, moronic maniacs and to allow the Metropolitan Police access to arrest 20-year-old Newcastle resident Holland and 21-year-old Clapham resident Plummer.
Valued at a sum of at least £75.3 million ($84.2 million, €86.6 million or درهم309.2 million), the painting was fortunately protected by a piece of glass but National Gallery sources later confirmed: “There is some minor damage to the frame, but the painting is unharmed.”
In a statement late Friday, scumbags associated with the duo raged: “The art establishment, artists and the art-loving public need to step up into civil resistance if they want to live a world where humans are around to appreciate art.”
Subsequently, however, Holland and Plummer were deservedly condemned for their totally irrational and utterly pointless prank. On Twitter, one user called the pugnacious pair “Hooray Henrietta thugs” whilst broadcaster Janet Street-Porter added: “[Does] vandalising a masterpiece make a point about the cost of living? Well done Phoebe and Anna – you are just a couple of twerps.”
Another, Russ Jones, sensibly concluded:
“What on earth has Van Gogh’s ‘Sunflowers’ got to do with oil? Why not shove Michelangelo’s ‘David’ into the sea to stop oil? Pound a mammoth skeleton into dust to stop oil? Stab a dolphin? Piss onto a puffin? I’m completely behind stopping oil, but this seems mad.”
The disgraceful duo behind this pointless protest must have alerted members of the media in advance as cameras were present to capture their disgraceful action. Shame on the media present for not alerting the police and National Gallery. This disgrace clearly could have been prevented.The Metropolitan Police, for once, did a great job and swiftly dragged Holland and Plummer down to the nick – along with their can of Heinz tomato soup.In a separate incident yesterday afternoon, another member of the same group sprayed orange paint over the New Scotland Yard sign outside the Metropolitan Police headquarters. Lora Johnson, 38, of Southwold was subsequently also arrested and charged.Hypocritical heiress Aileen Getty’s wealth stems from oil, yet she spends her wealth funding morons who go around attacking oil paintings. She ought to consider the ridiculousness of her position given that she lives off wealth created from oil – the very thing those she funds are so hateful of.
Twitter reactions to the mindless vandalism of a Van Gogh…
As new theories about Elon Musk and Ghislaine Maxwell’s connections emerge, further new stories about the grubby groper’s deviancy follow involving Donald Trump and a Scottish madam
Like the case of the boy who repeatedly cried wolf, grubby groper Ghislaine Maxwell is someone whose word simply cannot be trusted.
Now, as she experiences the realities of her 20-year prison term, maybe, just maybe this wicked wench might name names before a June 2023 deadline if she wants to see her sentence reduced – and now, also, it seems powerful people are starting to get worried.
Yesterday, the jailed sex trafficker and mucky madam Miss Maxwell – AKA Mrs Scott Borgerson, ‘Jennifer Ellmax,’ ‘Jen Marshall,’ ‘Janet Marshall’ and just plain old ‘G’ – returned to the news when the Mirror’s United States editor Christopher Bucktin revealed that she supposedly “asked the Elon Musk to ‘destroy the Internet’ before [appearing with him in a now] notorious party photo.”
Taken in 2014 at a Vanity Fair party, the aforementioned snap of the billionaire Tesla CEO being, as he has claimed on Twitter, “photo-bombed” by the since disgraced pension pot plunderer’s daughter, it “has [also] been claimed,” captured a moment witnessed by an unnamed Vanity Fair employee.
Of it, this ‘source’ told the New York Times: “The pair chatted. Ms Maxwell asked if Mr Musk if there were a way to remove oneself from the Internet and encouraged Mr Musk to destroy [it].”
Continuing, Bucktin added that this unnamed magazine worker claimed that “Maxwell also allegedly asked why aliens had yet to make contact with humans.”
The source curiously claimed: “Musk replied that all civilisations eventually end – including Maxwell’s hypothetical alien one – and raised the possibility that humans are living in a simulation.”
Previously Musk has stated “don’t know [her] at all” of Jeffrey Epstein’s hideous henchwoman, whilst earlier this month The Guardian reported that a new book has suggested that Donald Trump has been doing his best to distance himself from the deviancy of his former friend.
According to the paper, author of Confidence Man: The Making of Donald Trump and the Breaking of America Maggie Haberman suggests that Trump asked campaign advisers at a meeting in July 2020 in the Oval Office: “You see that article in the [New York] Post today that mention me… She [GM] say anything about me?”
The paper’s Page Six story concerned quoted Steven Hoffenberg, the since deceased convicted Ponzi scheming mentor of Epstein, as saying: “Ghislaine thought she was untouchable – that she’d be protected by the intelligence communities she and Jeffrey helped with information: the Israeli intelligence services, and Les Wexner, who has given millions to Israel; by Prince Andrew, President Clinton and even by President Trump, who was well-known to be an acquaintance of her and Epstein’s.”
Elsewhere in other news, a Scottish madam has claimed she once received a call from Ghislaine Maxwell, but “refused to provide women for Jeffrey Epstein” according to the Daily Record.
Anna Gristina, from Kirkliston, West Lothian – who herself spent four months on remand at the Rikers Island prison in New York in 2012 for her involvement in a £6 million vice ring – told Radar Online “she ran a legitimate matchmaking service” and stated: “[Maxwell] called up from London to say she had a gentleman friend in Florida who likes company, but he likes younger girls and she heard I was very reputable and had the best models in the industry.”
She added: “”I was at a hockey game with my kids when the call came in. Afterward, I did a little digging and my friend told me to stay away. If I had known more at the time I would have turned him in.”
The fake and staged photographs associated with the mucky madam and her cohort Jeffrey Epstein
29th April 2021 – Lawyers for Maxwell issue an image of her purportedly which they claimed to be her with a black eye. It turned out that the wicked wench had simply had an eye infection.
5th December 2010 – Jeffrey Epstein and Prince Andrew walking in New York. Of this the journalist who tracked the pair down with photographer Jae Donnelly, Annette Witheridge, told the Mirror: “My theory is Epstein wanted to be pictured. Why go out in the bitter cold for a quick walk around Central Park? I think Epstein was relying on the fact a photographer was outside. He would’ve known we were there, we weren’t trying to hide. He had been in prison and he wanted to rehabilitate his reputation. Who better to be seen with than the Queen’s son? He was saying to the world that Prince Andrew is my friend.”
10th March 2001 – Forever world-famous photo that cost Prince Andrew a payment of circa £12 million to a woman, Virginia Roberts Giuffre, he claimed never to have met taken at Miss Maxwell’s Kinnerton Street, Belgravia mews house. This infamous image has never been discredited in spite of claims from Prince Andrew and others.
This anything but fake photograph of “chubby fingered” Prince Andrew, Virginia Roberts and Ghislaine Maxwell on the first-floor landing of 44 Kinnerton Street, Belgravia, London, SW1X 8ES on 10th March 2001 quite rightly remains in the public domain in spite of the royal and others such as Lady Victoria Hervey claiming it to have been a doctored creation.A walk in New York’s Central Park in December 2010 in matching jackets illustrated the deviancy of Jeffrey Epstein; the by then convicted paedophile clearly wanted to be snapped with a royal as he sought to attempt to restore his reputation – a ‘quality’ clearly shared by his former lover and the woman he most likely funneled dirty stolen pension pot money for.Prior to her arrest at the curiously named ‘Tucked Away’ using the invented name ‘Jen Marshall’ or Janet Marshall,’ woman-of-multiple identities Ghislaine Maxwell’s associates allegedly released faked images of her at an In-N-Out restaurant in August 2019. The advert in the background at the bus stop had never been at that location.Another example of deviancy came about when the mucky madam’s then lawyers tried to make out their client was being abused in jail and released a picture of her with what they claimed to be a black eye. It was simply an eye infection and now they’re probably regretting helping her as she’s not even paid their bills.That Fox News thought it funny to share a faked picture of a judge with connections to both the cases of Trump and Epstein with Maxwell was a further curious example of deviancy at work in this sordid saga.Trump and Maxwell’s history goes back decades. He clearly sent her a message with his “I wish her well, whatever that may mean” message when asked about her during his presidential term.
Names in the firing line most obvious from Ghislaine’s filthy ‘Little Black Book’ as she seeks to minimise her sentence
Ghislaine Maxwell has until June 2023 to cooperate and thus “name names” if she wishes to see her sentence reduced.
Those Scott Borgerson’s estranged wife has been known to associate with – none of whom The Steeple Times is suggesting at this time as having been involved in any of her crimes, but whom she might seek revenge against for not offering her what she might consider enough public or even private support – include:
Alexander Acosta
Woody Allen
Ehud Barak
Tom Barrack
Scott Borgerson (estranged husband, facing legal woes in connections with the non-payment of his wife’s vast legal bills)
Jean-Luc Brunel (deceased)
Naomi Campbell
President Bill Clinton and his wife Hillary
Alan Dershowitz
Glenn Dubin and his wife Eva
Bernie Ecclestone
Bill Gates
Geordie Greig
Countess of Iveagh (AKA Clare Guinness, Clare Hazell)
As Gerry and Kate McCann lose their libel case in the European Court of Human Rights, it is time for the pointless and totally wasteful £14 million search for their daughter to finally wind down
Bringing an end to an almighty and very costly charade where costs and damages will likely run into the hundreds of thousands for the McCanns and their foundation, Mr Amaral’s victory in this highest of courts ends the prospects of the British couple being able to pursue him further.
In a judgment issued online, “the European Court of Human Rights held, unanimously, that there had been: no violation of Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life) of the European Convention on Human Rights.”
Going further, the court added:
“The case concerned statements made by a former detective inspector – in a book, a documentary and a newspaper interview – about the applicants’ alleged involvement in the disappearance of their daughter, Madeleine McCann, who went missing on 3 May 2007 in southern Portugal. Before the Court, the applicants alleged that there had been a violation of their right to reputation and to their right to be presumed innocent.”
“The Court considered that, even assuming that the applicants’ reputation had been damaged, this was not on account of the argument put forward by the book’s author but rather as a result of the suspicions expressed against them, which had led to their being placed under investigation in the course of the criminal investigation (the prosecutor’s office decided to take no further action in July 2008) and had led to intense media attention and much controversy.”
“The information had thus been brought to the public’s attention in some detail even before the investigation file was made available to the media and the book in question was published. It followed that the national authorities had not failed in their positive obligation to protect the applicants’ right to respect for their private life.”
“The Court also considered that in the Supreme Court’s judgments of January and March 2017 – concerning the civil claims lodged by the applicants – it had not made comments implying any guilt on the part of the applicants or even suggesting suspicions against them with regard to the circumstances in which their daughter had disappeared. The applicants’ complaint concerning their right to be presumed innocent was thus manifestly ill-founded.”
Responding, journalist and anti-corruption in charity campaigner Matthew Steeples, who has written extensively about the case since 2007 and who was introduced to Mr and Mrs McCann by the “Chanel-clad” former charity boss Baroness Meyer remarked:
“The vexatiously litigious McCanns have failed in their efforts to sully the name of Gonçalo Amaral. They have, with clear tenacity, gone after this Portuguese police officer again and again since 2008 and when Portugal’s highest court ruled that he was entitled to ‘freedom of expression’ in 2017, they still did not give up.”
“Today, having wasted yet more money in regard to a case of a ‘missing person’ who will likely never be found on top of the £14 million ($16 million, €15.9 million or درهم58.8 million) of public money already squandered, I suggest that it is time for this merry-go-round to stop and it is also time for Mr Amaral to be left in peace.”
“Whatever occurred on the evening of 3rd May 2007 in Praia da Luz, Portugal was most certainly a tragedy and a tragedy most definitely for Madeleine McCann – a 3-year-old child who had a full life ahead of her. It was right that the case was investigated, but over 15 years have passed.”
“As I have said again and again, there are other missing people out there and there are cases that with resources could and can be solved. These cases get little to no support and the disproportionate allocation of resources to the search for Madeleine McCann – a child who would by now be an 18-year-old adult – is clearly never going to lead anywhere.”
“Enough is enough. The end of the road has been reached and it is time that the Metropolitan Police finally wound down the disgraceful waste of money and resources that is Operation Grange.”
Meanwhile elsewhere, again today, we remind readers that Christian Brueckner – the current main ‘suspect’ in the case – has still not been charged. Strange that; very strange indeed.
Pictured top – ‘Missing’ since 3rd May 2007 Madeleine McCann (left) as a child and her parents out running in the days after their daughter supposedly vanished off-the-face of the planet.
Gonçalo Amaral was again victorious after the ECHR decided in favour of the Portuguese civil courts being right in their decision.The European Court of Human Rights tossed out Mr and Mrs McCann’s case against Portuguese detective Gonçalo Amaral on Tuesday 20th September 2022 as utterly meritless. This undignified pair should now see sense and put up and shut up.The information shared by the court prior to judgment clearly explains the details of the longstanding dispute in question.
Missing Madeleine – Questions STILL without Answers
Many questions about what happened on the evening of the disappearance of Madeleine McCann remain. Some that have been highlighted by the press and discussed online include:
Why did Kate McCann refuse to answer 48 questions put to her by the Portuguese police?
Why were certain records of phone calls on the evening of the disappearance “whoosh-clunked” from the memories of the phones of Mr and Mrs McCann and the ‘Tapas 7’?
Why were relevant mobile phone records never handed over to the authorities in spite of them potentially being useful to the search?
Why did the couple not use the babysitting service on offer in the holiday resort on the evening of 3rd May 2007 when they went out on the razzle dazzle with friends?
Why was the door to the apartment – which opened directly onto a public highway – left unlocked with three children aged under three years old alone inside?
Why did a British sniffer dog sense the smell of a corpse in a cupboard in the apartment from which Madeleine McCann disappeared?
Why did a sniffer dog also supposedly sense the smell of a corpse in a vehicle hired by the couple a month after the disappearance of their daughter?
Why did the McCanns repeatedly try to discredit the work of the sniffer dogs and their handlers?
Why did Mr and Mrs McCann go jogging and play tennis in the days after their daughter’s disappearance?
Was it acceptable for Mr and Mrs McCann’s mortgage to be paid by the fund established to search for their missing daughter?
Why have the McCanns attempted to ‘gag’ anyone who disputes their version of events – most especially Gonçalo Amaral?
Why given over £14 million has been spent on this search to date has nobody come forward with any sighting of ‘missing’ Madeleine McCann given the rewards on offer?
In December 2017, when £11 million of British taxpayers’ money had been spent towards the search for ‘missing’ Madeleine McCann, 86% of viewers of ITV1’s ‘Loose Women’ said the public purse should cease to fund the investigation. Now, in September 2022, with that sum now well in excess of £14 million (aside from the millions in private money also), it is time to allocate resources to the search for missing people who actually can be found, we would suggest.
As it emerges that the Germans are taking the biscuit and the prospect of Christian Brueckner being charged in the Madeleine McCann case has slimmed further, isn’t it time that this pointless £14 million investigation was closed down?
After Matthew Steeples of The Steeple Times and Alexis Parr and Richard Eden of the Daily Mail shared an appeal for a missing friend, William Cookson, useful leads poured in that helped lead to his location being identified. Wonderfully, William was subsequently found, but meanwhile the Metropolitan Police – a force rightly currently being analysed for its gross incompetence – continue their charade of ‘investigating’ the ‘disappearance’ of Madeleine McCann.
With £14 million thrown already down the Thomas Crapper by that incompetent set of officers on a search for a child that would have been found given some nefarious sort would have come forward to trade some other nefarious sort in given the rewards on offer, it wasn’t surprising this morning when The Mirror – one of the few papers to report honestly on this case – shared news that the chances of the definitely vile sex offender Christian Brueckner has slimmed further.
In an “exclusive” article about how the German – referenced in many titles just as ‘Christian B’ – likely faces charges of a number of other sex offences, Patrick Hill and Rob Hill for the paper claimed: “There is no end in sight for the Maddie probe itself.”
Hans Christian Wolters, the head of the inquiry into the ‘disappearance’ of the child of Gerry and Kate McCann in Germany, added: “The investigation into Maddie is still ongoing. A conclusion is not insight. I really can’t say how long the investigation will take. It is also not certain whether an indictment can be made in the end.”
Previously and also writing for the red-top, Jerry Lawton and Ryan Merrifield revealed: “There is no evidence that the prime suspect in the Madeleine McCann case was responsible for her disappearance, claims an investigator. Ex-detective Mark Williams-Thomas says the then-toddler’s real abductor will now likely get away with it due to the narrow-minded focus on Christian Brueckner.”
Will Christian Brueckner ever be charged with the kidnapping/abuse/murder of Madeleine McCann or is this just another distraction to suit the narrative of Gerry and Kate McCann, the Met Police and others? #MadeleineMcCann#McCann#ChristianBrueckner#ChristianB#MetPolice
Missing Madeleine – Questions STILL without Answers
Many questions about what happened on the evening of the disappearance of Madeleine McCann remain. Some that have been highlighted by the press and discussed online include:
Why did Kate McCann refuse to answer 48 questions put to her by the Portuguese police?
Why were certain records of phone calls on the evening of the disappearance “whoosh-clunked” from the memories of the phones of Mr and Mrs McCann and the ‘Tapas 7’?
Why did a British sniffer dog sense the smell of a corpse in a cupboard in the apartment from which Madeleine McCann disappeared?
Why did a sniffer dog also supposedly sense the smell of a corpse in a vehicle hired by the couple a month after the disappearance of their daughter?
Why did Mr and Mrs McCann go jogging and play tennis in the days after their daughter’s disappearance?
Was it acceptable for Mr and Mrs McCann’s mortgage to be paid by the fund established to search for their missing daughter?
Kate McCann – a woman who went running, played tennis and dined on chicken and mushroom risotto and egg and watercress salads washed down with strawberry vodka with the paedophile Sir Clement Freud in the days after her daughter ‘disappeared’ – has a clear touch of the Duchess of Sussex about her. Like ‘MeGain,’ whom banged on that “not many people have asked if I’m OK,” Mrs McCann said in 2011: “Officers walked past us as if we weren’t there. Nobody asked how we were doing, whether we were okay. Our child had been stolen and I felt as if I didn’t exist.”Living it Large – Gerry McCann enjoying a round of golf (left); Kate McCann at Downing Street, London hobnobbing with Missing People CEO Martin Houghton-Brown, the Duchess of Gloucester and the then Home Secretary Theresa May on 23rd May 2012 (right).Amongst those to have supported the McCanns have been especially gobby attention seekers including job wrecker Sir Richard Branson, “Chanel-clad” charity begins at home tin banger Baroness (Catherine) Meyer and her pompous arsehole late ex-husband Sir Christopher and job wrecking grabber Sir Philip Green.
In December 2017, when £11 million of British taxpayers’ money had been spent towards the search for ‘missing’ Madeleine McCann, 86% of viewers of ITV1’s ‘Loose Women’ said the public purse should cease to fund the investigation. Now, in September 2022, with that sum now well in excess of £14 million (aside from the millions in private money also), it is time to allocate resources to the search for missing people who actually can be found, we would suggest.
