Category: Foot-in-Mouth

  • Spare Us Senseless Scobie – Omid Scobie Talks Nonsense About ‘Spare’

    Spare Us Senseless Scobie – Omid Scobie Talks Nonsense About ‘Spare’

    As Omid Scobie claims that drippy Prince Harry’s ‘Spare’ will reveal “the real truth” about him and his mendacious menace wife ‘MeGain,’ we say: Please spare us

    “Unless I’m missing something, what really would be a revelation would be for Harry to admit that, all things considered, he’s led a rather cushy, privileged life and if one of the worst things that happened to him was that he was born only second in line to the throne, then he might have done better not to have taken a reported £20 million for a four-book deal – does anyone want to read Harry on leadership and wellness? – and to have sucked it up and not made such a fuss” remarked John Crace this morning in The Guardian in his ‘Digested Week’ column.

     

    Quite right in his analysis, Crace hit the nail bang on the head, yet elsewhere yesterday the House of Sussex’s always predictably toady tin-banging twerp Omid Scobie decided to claim “the media’s got it all wrong about Prince Harry’s memoir.” Doing as he was no doubt told, as he always does when the mendacious menace formerly known as Meghan Markle no doubt put in a call, this PR peddler went further and declared to his extremely limited Yahoo! News UK audience: “Here’s the real truth.”

     

    Whilst anyone with a quarter of a brain would admit that senseless Scobie wouldn’t know “truth” it gnawed him repeatedly in the arse, the Finding Freedom ‘author’ whined about the “angered reactions” to the forthcoming diatribe of drivel that is Spare and suggested the media were claiming “quelle surprise, ‘all Meghan’s doing.’”

     

    Lauding the title of the tittle-tattling tome as a “punchy choice,” the unsophisticated former Heat gossip columnist and onetime mate of glamour ‘model’ Jodie Marsh continued his arse licking and declared:

     

    “So far, only the smallest official details about the book’s 416 pages have been released by the publisher. They describe SPARE as a title written with ‘raw, unflinching honestly,’ a book that is filled with ‘insight, revelation, self-examination, and hard-won wisdom.’ I’d expect nothing less from prolific ghostwriter J. R. Moehringer, who is famous for encouraging his subjects to switch on the lights in the darkest parts of their story.”

     

    Going further and bragging that he’s allegedly already seen the finished product, Scobie added:

     

    “Among those who have already had sight of the book’s manuscript, Harry’s journey of being the spare, plus that difficult decision to change his destiny and start a new life elsewhere, serve as significant parts of the book. Filled with the prince’s trademark cheekiness, this memoir also tells a surprisingly relatable life story. Sure, its opulent royal backdrop is far beyond a world any of us will ever know, but themes explored in SPARE should resonate with readers from all backgrounds.”

     

    “For all the tabloid reports about Harry supposedly ‘trashing’ his family (spoiler alert: he doesn’t), the book actually offers a more sympathetic look at the realities of their near-impossible existence. There were also no last-minute rewrites or edits after the Queen’s death. SPARE’s manuscript was completed almost five months before the monarch’s passing, a detail that will be acknowledged in a note at the start of the book.”

     

    “Hundreds of journalists, including myself, have written versions and fragments of the duke’s story over the years. It’s a story that, as a working member of the Royal Family, he has long been unable to tell himself. Now, having created an independent life away from the confines of the royal institution, Harry finally has the chance to set often-inaccurately reported records straight. The freedom of speech. And no matter how you may feel about the man, it’s hard not to agree he should have the right to that.”

     

    Elsewhere this week, speaking exclusively to The Steeple Times, the wicked wench formerly known as Meghan Markle’s somewhat more sensible sister, Samantha, declared of Spare: “’Spare’ us all the hypocritical pity party.” She is right and this book deserves only one thing; pulping.

     

    Pictured top – Twitter users unsurprisingly loathe and detest the mouthpiece of the Duchess of Sussex and mocked his ‘Finding Freedom’ as ‘Finding French Fries’ recently.

     

    Web Summit 2023
    Attempting to move the story onto his never-sorry-self, the ‘Finding Freedom’ PR peddling pillock shared news about how he’d been on the stage at Web Summit 2023 in Lisbon. He tweeted: “This year’s @WebSummit was the first to include stages focused on media, publishing and journalism so I was excited to be invited to speak, share stories, and discuss some of the challenges our industries are facing (from cancel culture to misinformation) and how to tackle them.” It was a shame he didn’t share that he’s the queen of misinformation himself.
    Jodie Marsh and Omid Scobie
    In August 2020, the ‘Daily Mail’ shared that plastic-not-fantastic Omid previously worked at gossip magazine ‘Heat’ and partied with the ‘glamour model’ Jodie Marsh. They mentioned how somebody had “airbrushed” Meghan Markle’s “entry on the online encyclopedia Wikipedia… to include more flattering details days before her romance with Prince Harry became public” and illustrated the ‘Finding Freedom’ author’s “drastic transformation” in two very different photographs. Maniac Scobie is someone who most definitely would like his past forgotten, but here again we remind him that he’s actually just a two-faced twerp who spins nothing but nonsense.

    Twitter reacts to Scobie’s diatribe of nonsense about Prince Harry’s nonsensical ‘Spare’…

  • Moron of the Moment 2022 – Immigrant Hater Natalie Elphicke OBE MP

    Moron of the Moment 2022 – Immigrant Hater Natalie Elphicke OBE MP

    Immigrant hater Natalie Elphicke OBE MP should be reminded that she, the wife of a convicted sex offender, is the noxious nasty who actually deserves to be hated

    In March this year, The Steeple Times slammed the “total plonker” Conservative Member of Parliament for Dover, Natalie Elphicke, over her pathetic handling of the sacking of 800 P&O ferry workers by Zoom after she deservedly got heckled at a protest in support of their rights.

     

    Unsurprisingly called out then also as a “stunningly stupid woman who once ludicrously suggested “border issues at Dover were not a problem created by Brexit, but were Brussels’ fault,” this 51-year-old first took her seat in December 2019 and now, this morning, she showed herself up when she penned yet another of her regular rants for The Mail on Sunday.

     

    Previously, Dover had been the domain of her husband, Charlie – a cretinous creep known for running around the marital home yelling: “I’m a naughty Tory” as he went about groping horrified visiting ladies. Mr Elphicke was subsequently thrown in the slammer in July 2020 after being convicted of three counts of sexual assault against two women.

     

    In today’s column, which was titled: “When will The Left admit this is no refugee crisis… but simply illegal immigration,” Mrs Elphicke blamed everyone but her own party for refugees landing daily on British shores. “They are not fleeing wars,” she raged, before adding: “The injustice affects everyone… Not that you’d know it from the handwringing rights industry, the charity sector and the skewed reporting of the issue from the Left-wing media and the BBC.”

     

    Instead of seeking a solution on British shores, this heartless multi-millionaire mother-of-two simply offered: “It is undoubtedly the case that more can be done in France” before demanding “an immediate solution.” Idealistic, yes, realistic no and achievable, most definitely not.

     

    Frankly, all this latest column does is to provide further indication that here is an impractical woman unfit to represent the 72,000 people of her constituency. It is now jolly well time for ‘Nasty Nat’ to finally do the decent thing – resign and make way for someone who might actually help work towards a solution to this very real problem; a very real problem that affects both those arriving in Britain and those already living in Dover and beyond.

     

    Immigrant hater Natalie Elphicke OBE MP turned up to court regularly with her husband during his trial for sexual assault. She openly supported him and smiled for the cameras willingly alongside him, but as soon as he was convicted she took £25,000 from ‘The Sun’ for a negative story about him. Just days later, she changed her mind yet again and claimed her criminal hubby had been punished for being “charming, wealthy and successful – attractive, and attracted to, women.” She dismissed the claims of his accusers as nonsense and then, along with four other MPs (Sir Roger Gale, Theresa Villiers, Adam Holloway and Bob Stewart), were censored for using parliamentary notepaper to improperly pestering the judiciary with “naughty notes” trying to get the rotten sex offender off in November 2020. Here is a woman incapable of making up her mind and sticking to a single belief; here is a woman wholeheartedly unfit to be a Member of Parliament.
    Yesterday, the MP shared a video in a tweet caption: “I came across a discarded small boat on the beach in Dover earlier. Many more illegal arrivals again today.  We must get a grip on the small boats crisis and stop boats like this arriving on our shores.” Instead of telling those poor souls seeking asylum to “get a grip,” she ought first to “get a grip” and deal with the continuing fallout from her husband’s convictions and her efforts to clear this filthy pervert’s rotten name.

    Twitter reacts to the Member of Parliament for Dover’s latest antics…

  • Dopey Dent Coad Ditched – Kensington Labour Rejects Emma Dent Coad

    Dopey Dent Coad Ditched – Kensington Labour Rejects Emma Dent Coad

    Matthew Steeples suggests mouthy ex-MP Emma Dent Coad’s latest moan about how Labour have ditched her as a future candidate show her for what she is; a sore loser and a far-left hectoring harridan

    Ten days ago, ex-MP for Kensington Emma Dent Coad – a hectoring harridan with a penchant for using the block button on Twitter to anyone who dares calls out her diatribe of drivel – issued a statement after she was excluded from being on Labour’s longlist of prospective candidates for the next election.

     

    At the time, the far-left royal hater whined that she was “devastated” and “angry.” She moaned also that her party had “unjustly” prevented her from “standing for the seat I won just five years ago, the seat I came agonisingly close to holding even in 2019, despite the trade union backing which should have seen me longlisted automatically.” The now 67-year-old had won in 2017 by just 20 votes over Tory Lady ‘Call me Victoria’ Borwick and lost by 150 in 2019 to Felicity ‘Flicka’ Buchan, also a Conservative.

     

    Dent Coad – who was deservedly slammed in 2017 for having used the racist description “token ghetto boy” of the then Conservative mayoral candidate Shaun Bailey in 2010 – is now being made into a martyr with Novara Media’s Andrew Fisher describing her exclusion as “factional manouverings” that will be a “self-defeating… slap in the face” for Labour and Sir Keir Starmer. He titled his ridiculous rant: “Labour’s cult of factionalism is going into overdrive. Emma Dent Coad is the latest scalp.”

     

    Speaking to the Communist Morning Star, a Momentum spokesperson added:

     

    “It is a travesty of justice that passionate, popular advocates for their community like Emma are being blocked en-masse by Keir Starmer’s Labour on spurious grounds, so loyalists from outside the area can be parachuted in.”

     

    “This is a deeply damaging episode for the Labour Party in Kensington, and one that local people are unlikely to forget.”

     

    Instead now, if Labour actually want to make headway given Rishi Sunak somewhat steadying the Conservatives in just a few days in office, it is time that the party woke up and smelt the markets. The days of trade unionism and Jeremy Corbyn are dead; Britain needs a centrist opposition that genuinely opposes, but one that actually works with business rather than supports strikes against it.

     

    Pictured top: Jeremy Corbyn apologist Owen Jones and Emma ‘Dense’ Dent Coad – a footnote in history who (along with Jones) has blocked ‘The Steeple Times’ on Twitter; here is a woman who plainly cannot cope with any discussion where she’s not hectoring all others.

     

    Twitter block
    Here is a privileged Kensington resident – who was married to Sir Hadley Gregory D’Oyly, 15th Baronet from 1978 to 1972 – who likes to play the card that she’s a woman of the people. She’s incapable of dialogue with anyone who doesn’t totally agree with her and simply blocks that dares question her on Twitter.
    One Kensington
    The far-left, Corbynite socialist councilor for the Globorne ward of the Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Council since 2006 is proud to be trade union backed and also has a book just out that she clearly wants to promote and profiteer from.

    Dent Coad’s statement in full:

    I am devastated that the Labour Party has blocked me from standing to once again represent my community in Parliament, the community I have spent the last 20 years of my life fighting for.

     

    At the same time, I am angry that local members and our local community in Kensington have been denied the opportunity to vote in a free and fair contest, which has been sacrificed for the sake of factional intrigue from Labour officials.

     

    This campaign has never been about me. I stood to offer dedicated representation for the people of Kensington in Parliament, from someone who knows and cares for our communities.

     

    From my role as a local councillor and Labour Group leader, to my campaigning efforts as Kensington’s MP on housing issues so dear to our hearts, I have only ever sought the chance to champion our people, whose voices all too often go unheard.

     

    If I have been outspoken in my politics, it is due to my passion and care for Kensington – for my neighbours and friends – and because of my burning desire to stamp out injustice and build a fairer, more equal society.

     

    Upsettingly, unaccountable Labour officials have exploited this outspokenness to unjustly prevent me from standing for the seat I won just five years ago, the seat I came agonisingly close to holding even in 2019, despite the trade union backing which should have seen me longlisted automatically.

     

    It is plain as day that the candidate selection process now being run by the Party is being factionally abused and is not fit for purpose.

     

    I deplore injustice, and through my 16 years on the Council, various reports and my recent book, ‘One Kensington’ I have done my utmost not only to draw attention to the very real inequalities in our community but to actively fight it, from the council chamber to the House of Commons.

     

    Above all, my driving ambition has been to combat the inequality which scars our community, the systematic disregard for working-class people which led to the atrocity of the Grenfell Tower fire, and which has led many to lose faith with the political process.

     

    These people deserve and need representation in Parliament. I hope that Labour’s eventual candidate will gain the respect and trust of all communities in Kensington. It won’t be easy.

     

    Solidarity,

     

    Emma

     

    Statement
    The ex-Labour MP for Kensington’s full statement. It clearly illustrates her lack of respect for democracy and how she is instead totally unfit to be a Member of Parliament again. In October 2019 whilst still an MP, she was forced to apologise after liking a Facebook post that claimed: Israel “disgraces all of us Jews worldwide,” according to the ‘Jewish News.’
  • Wally of the Week – The Rt. Hon. Liz Truss MP

    Wally of the Week – The Rt. Hon. Liz Truss MP

    That Liz Truss appointed an adviser who’d previously worked for the mate of paedophiles Prince Andrew sums up her complete lack of sense and good judgment; that she’s almost unpopular as the rotten ratbag royal is also telling

    George Canning lasted just 119 days in office from 12th April 1827 until his death on 8th August that year and now Liz Truss needs to ‘survive’ until 3rd January 2023 if she isn’t to replace him as the shortest serving Prime Minister in British history. Frankly, her chances of that seem a little bit beyond ‘Slim Shady.’

     

    Truss – a schoolgirl-like being akin to a cross between the lisping limpet Violet Elizabeth Bott and the hectoring harridan with a mission to make the nation fat that is Mary Berry – faces woes on all fronts. However, what was most telling was that her adviser Jason Stein, who was forced out yesterday, had previously been an adviser to the man who paid a sum commonly purported to be £12 million to a woman he claimed to have never met, the non-sweaty friend of paedophiles Prince Andrew.

     

    A clear case of “the truth being stranger than fiction,” the choices of Truss – a woman whose own lack of loyalty was illustrated most clearly when she had an affair with the now former MP Mark Field in 2006 – in also both her also-now-gone Chancellor and Home Secretary are most definitely indicative of someone who simply doesn’t have her finger on the pulse in any regard.

     

    Elsewhere yesterday, the booze loving Felicity ‘Call Me Flicka’ Buchan, was called out by the acidicly acerbic blog From The Hornets Nest for being a “rare voice of support” for Ms Truss. Quoting an article from The Times, the blog observed that the Kensington MP was “out on a limb in supporting [the] hapless” Prime Minister and claimed it was “as if Truss was working for the Labour Party” and “was unfit for purpose.”

     

    Going further, it was observed of a meeting of the One Nation Group:

     

    “One obsequious murmur came from the minister Felicity Buchan, who offered a rare voice of support. But otherwise, the MPs filtered out of the room, and to their various disconsolate dinners, in a state of open hopelessness. ‘It was 99 per cent unsympathetic, 1 per cent Felicity Buchan,’ one said.”

     

    Update – 2pm, 20th October – ‘Slim Shady’ Liz Truss proved to come and go even quicker than expected and now the shortest serving PM in British history has gone after just 44 days in office; God only knows what calamity comes next.

     

    Pictured top – Two of the most unpopular people in Britain right now, Liz Truss and the Duke of York. What a pair of berks!

     

    Mark Field strangler
    The former lover of Liz Truss, the now ex-MP Mark Field, came under fire in June 2019 after he grabbed a female protester by the neck at a bankers’ banquet. He was subsequently suspended from his Foreign Office position for manhandling Greenpeace activist Janet Barker. Rabbit loving farm dweller Ms Barker, 38, subsequently suggested Field “should consider anger management lessons” but did not comment on what she thought of the then Westminster MP’s sexual antics with the now (for the moment) Prime Minister he had enjoyed intimate relations with.
    Prime Minister
    Once lauded as ‘Lioness Liz,’ but now more widely considered to be ‘Loopy Liz’ and ‘Ludicrous Liz,’ here is a Prime Minister who is nothing but an international laughing stock. King Charles rightly muttered “oh dear, you’re back again” on encountering her recently and soon she’ll no doubt be consigned to where all political careers inevitably end – the dustbin of failures. Poor, laughable lassy Liz Truss.
    George Canning
    Will the current Prime Minister beat George Canning in having a record for being the shortest-lived Prime Minister in office? Given her current predicament, she looks most likely to be the ultimate winner.
    Felicity Buchan booze
    When you’ve got the backing of the current MP for Kensington – who won by just 150 votes at the last general election– you know you’re onto a loser. Boozed-up Felicity Buchan – a woman who has failed to reply to a letter sent to her by her constituent Matthew Steeples in July 2022 – is someone no one in their right-mind would want the backing of. Lazy and ludicrous, here is someone who can’t even deal with the potholes in Walton Street, the very street she lives in in Knightsbridge let alone judge the mood of the nation.
  • Morons of the Moment 2022 – Despicable Just Stop Oil Vandals

    Morons of the Moment 2022 – Despicable Just Stop Oil Vandals

    The Just Stop Oil ‘protestors’ who attacked a Van Gogh yesterday should be branded as what they truly are: Moronic vandals; that their organisation is funded by a member of the Getty family is even more outrageous

    Vexatious vicenarians Anna Holland and Phoebe Plummer are due at Westminster Magistrates’ Court today after being charged with criminal damage to Vincent Van Gogh’s ‘Sunflowers’ (1888) oil painting at the National Gallery in London.

     

    At 11am yesterday, these Just Stop Oil ‘protestors’ (as they’d like to brand themselves; we’ll instead term them ‘brainless vandals’) entered Room 43 at the gallery and threw an orange substance believed to be Heinz tomato soup at the painting. They then glued themselves to the wall beneath it and started shouting.

     

    The pink haired half of this deranged pair of deviants launched into what Metro termed a “rambling tirade” and ranted:

     

    “What is worth more, art of life? Is it worth more than food, worth more than justice?”

     

    “Are you more concerned about the protection of a painting or the protection of our planet and people?”

     

    “The cost of living crisis is part of the cost of oil crisis. Fuel is unaffordable to millions of cold, hungry families. They can’t even afford to heat a tin of soup.”

     

    “We cannot afford more oil and gas. It is going to take everything we know and love. We will [unintelligible]…”

     

    At this point security guards cleared the room to spare other visitors listening to these attention-seeking, moronic maniacs and to allow the Metropolitan Police access to arrest 20-year-old Newcastle resident Holland and 21-year-old Clapham resident Plummer.

     

    Valued at a sum of at least £75.3 million ($84.2 million, €86.6 million or درهم309.2 million), the painting was fortunately protected by a piece of glass but National Gallery sources later confirmed: “There is some minor damage to the frame, but the painting is unharmed.”

     

    In a statement late Friday, scumbags associated with the duo raged: “The art establishment, artists and the art-loving public need to step up into civil resistance if they want to live a world where humans are around to appreciate art.”

     

    Subsequently, however, Holland and Plummer were deservedly condemned for their totally irrational and utterly pointless prank. On Twitter, one user called the pugnacious pair “Hooray Henrietta thugs” whilst broadcaster Janet Street-Porter added: “[Does] vandalising a masterpiece make a point about the cost of living? Well done Phoebe and Anna – you are just a couple of twerps.”

     

    Another, Russ Jones, sensibly concluded:

     

    “What on earth has Van Gogh’s ‘Sunflowers’ got to do with oil? Why not shove Michelangelo’s ‘David’ into the sea to stop oil? Pound a mammoth skeleton into dust to stop oil? Stab a dolphin? Piss onto a puffin? I’m completely behind stopping oil, but this seems mad.”

     

    Ironically, Aileen Getty gave £447,000 ($500,000, €514,000 or درهم1.8 million) to Climate Emergency Fund (CEF) – sponsors of Just Stop Oil’s obnoxious activities which also includes blocking roads used by ambulances rushing people to hospitals in the UK– in 2019. Her Getty Oil founder grandfather is no doubt spinning in his grave.

     

    The disgraceful duo behind this pointless protest must have alerted members of the media in advance as cameras were present to capture their disgraceful action. Shame on the media present for not alerting the police and National Gallery. This disgrace clearly could have been prevented.
    Metropolitan Police arrest
    The Metropolitan Police, for once, did a great job and swiftly dragged Holland and Plummer down to the nick – along with their can of Heinz tomato soup.
    New Scotland Yard
    In a separate incident yesterday afternoon, another member of the same group sprayed orange paint over the New Scotland Yard sign outside the Metropolitan Police headquarters. Lora Johnson, 38, of Southwold was subsequently also arrested and charged.
    Aileen Getty
    Hypocritical heiress Aileen Getty’s wealth stems from oil, yet she spends her wealth funding morons who go around attacking oil paintings. She ought to consider the ridiculousness of her position given that she lives off wealth created from oil – the very thing those she funds are so hateful of.

    Twitter reactions to the mindless vandalism of a Van Gogh…

  • Ghislaine’s Deviancy – New Allegations Against Ghislaine Maxwell

    Ghislaine’s Deviancy – New Allegations Against Ghislaine Maxwell

    As new theories about Elon Musk and Ghislaine Maxwell’s connections emerge, further new stories about the grubby groper’s deviancy follow involving Donald Trump and a Scottish madam

    Like the case of the boy who repeatedly cried wolf, grubby groper Ghislaine Maxwell is someone whose word simply cannot be trusted.

     

    Now, as she experiences the realities of her 20-year prison term, maybe, just maybe this wicked wench might name names before a June 2023 deadline if she wants to see her sentence reduced – and now, also, it seems powerful people are starting to get worried.

     

    Yesterday, the jailed sex trafficker and mucky madam Miss Maxwell – AKA Mrs Scott Borgerson, ‘Jennifer Ellmax,’ ‘Jen Marshall,’ ‘Janet Marshall’ and just plain old ‘G’ – returned to the news when the Mirror’s United States editor Christopher Bucktin revealed that she supposedly “asked the Elon Musk to ‘destroy the Internet’ before [appearing with him in a now] notorious party photo.”

     

    Taken in 2014 at a Vanity Fair party, the aforementioned snap of the billionaire Tesla CEO being, as he has claimed on Twitter, “photo-bombed” by the since disgraced pension pot plunderer’s daughter, it “has [also] been claimed,” captured a moment witnessed by an unnamed Vanity Fair employee.

     

    Of it, this ‘source’ told the New York Times: “The pair chatted. Ms Maxwell asked if Mr Musk if there were a way to remove oneself from the Internet and encouraged Mr Musk to destroy [it].”

     

    Continuing, Bucktin added that this unnamed magazine worker claimed that “Maxwell also allegedly asked why aliens had yet to make contact with humans.”

     

    The source curiously claimed: “Musk replied that all civilisations eventually end – including Maxwell’s hypothetical alien one – and raised the possibility that humans are living in a simulation.”

     

    Previously Musk has stated “don’t know [her] at all” of Jeffrey Epstein’s hideous henchwoman, whilst earlier this month The Guardian reported that a new book has suggested that Donald Trump has been doing his best to distance himself from the deviancy of his former friend.

     

    According to the paper, author of Confidence Man: The Making of Donald Trump and the Breaking of America Maggie Haberman suggests that Trump asked campaign advisers at a meeting in July 2020 in the Oval Office: “You see that article in the [New York] Post today that mention me… She [GM] say anything about me?”

     

    The paper’s Page Six story concerned quoted Steven Hoffenberg, the since deceased convicted Ponzi scheming mentor of Epstein, as saying: “Ghislaine thought she was untouchable – that she’d be protected by the intelligence communities she and Jeffrey helped with information: the Israeli intelligence services, and Les Wexner, who has given millions to Israel; by Prince Andrew, President Clinton and even by President Trump, who was well-known to be an acquaintance of her and Epstein’s.”

     

    Elsewhere in other news, a Scottish madam has claimed she once received a call from Ghislaine Maxwell, but “refused to provide women for Jeffrey Epstein” according to the Daily Record.

     

    Anna Gristina, from Kirkliston, West Lothian – who herself spent four months on remand at the Rikers Island prison in New York in 2012 for her involvement in a £6 million vice ring – told Radar Online “she ran a legitimate matchmaking service” and stated: “[Maxwell] called up from London to say she had a gentleman friend in Florida who likes company, but he likes younger girls and she heard I was very reputable and had the best models in the industry.”

     

    She added: “”I was at a hockey game with my kids when the call came in. Afterward, I did a little digging and my friend told me to stay away. If I had known more at the time I would have turned him in.”

     

    The fake and staged photographs associated with the mucky madam and her cohort Jeffrey Epstein

    • 10th August 2022 – Fox News air a photoshopped image of Judge Bruce Reinhart sitting on a private plane with Ghislaine Maxwell. The original image had featured Jeffrey Epstein and had been doctored after Reinhart signed the arrant on the search of Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate. Fox host Brian Kilmeade later tweeted: “This depiction never took place and we wanted to make clear that we were showing a meme in jest.”
    • 29th April 2021 – Lawyers for Maxwell issue an image of her purportedly which they claimed to be her with a black eye. It turned out that the wicked wench had simply had an eye infection.
    • 12th August 2019 – Pictured at an In-N-Out burger diner in Los Angeles, California in a clearly doctored shot. Photo of of the ‘Bouncing Czech’s’ deviant daughter taken allegedly by Leah Saffian.
    • 5th December 2010 – Jeffrey Epstein and Prince Andrew walking in New York. Of this the journalist who tracked the pair down with photographer Jae Donnelly, Annette Witheridge, told the Mirror: “My theory is Epstein wanted to be pictured. Why go out in the bitter cold for a quick walk around Central Park? I think Epstein was relying on the fact a photographer was outside. He would’ve known we were there, we weren’t trying to hide. He had been in prison and he wanted to rehabilitate his reputation. Who better to be seen with than the Queen’s son? He was saying to the world that Prince Andrew is my friend.”
    • 10th March 2001 – Forever world-famous photo that cost Prince Andrew a payment of circa £12 million to a woman, Virginia Roberts Giuffre, he claimed never to have met taken at Miss Maxwell’s Kinnerton Street, Belgravia mews house. This infamous image has never been discredited in spite of claims from Prince Andrew and others.

     

    44 Kinnerton Street
    This anything but fake photograph of “chubby fingered” Prince Andrew, Virginia Roberts and Ghislaine Maxwell on the first-floor landing of 44 Kinnerton Street, Belgravia, London, SW1X 8ES on 10th March 2001 quite rightly remains in the public domain in spite of the royal and others such as Lady Victoria Hervey claiming it to have been a doctored creation.
    Prince Andrew Jeffrey Epstein 2010 park walk
    A walk in New York’s Central Park in December 2010 in matching jackets illustrated the deviancy of Jeffrey Epstein; the by then convicted paedophile clearly wanted to be snapped with a royal as he sought to attempt to restore his reputation – a ‘quality’ clearly shared by his former lover and the woman he most likely funneled dirty stolen pension pot money for.
    Fake In-N-Out photo 2019
    Prior to her arrest at the curiously named ‘Tucked Away’ using the invented name ‘Jen Marshall’ or Janet Marshall,’ woman-of-multiple identities Ghislaine Maxwell’s associates allegedly released faked images of her at an In-N-Out restaurant in August 2019. The advert in the background at the bus stop had never been at that location.
    Fake black eye photo
    Another example of deviancy came about when the mucky madam’s then lawyers tried to make out their client was being abused in jail and released a picture of her with what they claimed to be a black eye. It was simply an eye infection and now they’re probably regretting helping her as she’s not even paid their bills.
    Fake plane photo
    That Fox News thought it funny to share a faked picture of a judge with connections to both the cases of Trump and Epstein with Maxwell was a further curious example of deviancy at work in this sordid saga.
    With Donald and Melania Trump
    Trump and Maxwell’s history goes back decades. He clearly sent her a message with his “I wish her well, whatever that may mean” message when asked about her during his presidential term.

    Names in the firing line most obvious from Ghislaine’s filthy ‘Little Black Book’ as she seeks to minimise her sentence

    Ghislaine Maxwell has until June 2023 to cooperate and thus “name names” if she wishes to see her sentence reduced.

     

    Those Scott Borgerson’s estranged wife has been known to associate with – none of whom The Steeple Times is suggesting at this time as having been involved in any of her crimes, but whom she might seek revenge against for not offering her what she might consider enough public or even private support – include:

     

    • Alexander Acosta
    • Woody Allen
    • Ehud Barak
    • Tom Barrack
    • Scott Borgerson (estranged husband, facing legal woes in connections with the non-payment of his wife’s vast legal bills)
    • Jean-Luc Brunel (deceased)
    • Naomi Campbell
    • President Bill Clinton and his wife Hillary
    • Alan Dershowitz
    • Glenn Dubin and his wife Eva
    • Bernie Ecclestone
    • Bill Gates
    • Geordie Greig
    • Countess of Iveagh (AKA Clare Guinness, Clare Hazell)
    • Lord Mandelson
    • Marvin Minsky
    • George J. Mitchell
    • Rupert Murdoch
    • Elon Musk
    • Peter Nygård
    • Bill Richardson III
    • Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman
    • Kevin Spacey (who is currently involved in a civil sexual assault trial himself)
    • Jes Staley
    • Ken Starr
    • President Donald Trump and his potentially trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein wife Melania
    • Ivana Trump (deceased)
    • Chris Tucker
    • Harvey Weinstein
    • Leslie Wexner
    • Prince Andrew, Duke of York and his live-in ex-wife Sarah, Duchess of York

     

  • Arresting Andy – More Woes For Deplorable Duke Of York

    Arresting Andy – More Woes For Deplorable Duke Of York

    It looks as if there might be more woes to come for Prince Andrew as Ghislaine Maxwell is given until June 2023 to dob those she sex trafficked to in; the FBI should get ready to do some arresting

    Whilst the Daily Mail’s Ephraim Hardcastle effectively somewhat ludicrously suggested on Thursday that there might be a way back for Prince Andrew or at the least the saving of his HRH title because of his daughter’s “virtues,” the DailyMail.com’s Harriet Alexander and Jamie Phillips were quite contradictory in arguing: “This isn’t the end of the story” for him in a separate article.

     

    With Ghislaine Maxwell given until June 2023 to cooperate with authorities over naming which famous faces she and Epstein actually sex trafficked her victims to, now comes the possibility that the royal’s mucky madam mate may be amongst others to get a visit from the rozzers.

     

    In July we reported Spencer Kuvin, a lawyer for several of the Epstein and Maxwell victims, telling the Mirror that the non-sweating favourite child of the late Queen would be “one of the targets” of the FBI for potential prosecution in the wake of Maxwell’s sentencing, he went further this week and claimed: “She really holds all the secrets.”

     

    Bashed yet again in a new documentary titled Prince Andrew: Banished, the bestie of currently on trial for fraud Bernie Ecclestone was also slammed as an “idiot” and a “spoiled brat.” Amongst other comments made of him were that he was a “narcissist” and “there’s always onerunt of the litter, and Andrew was it… Couldn’t keep his trousers closed.”

     

    In the programme, of a braggart and bully who paid circa £12 million to a woman he claimed never to have met, ex-press secretary Dickie Arbiter shared: “The problem is, the man’s an idiot” whilst ‘royal author’ Phil Dampier added: “His one big thing is sex.”

     

    Going further, of why King Charles’s much loathed brother chose to associate with Epstein, Kirwan-Taylor suggested: “The moment he met Epstein, Andrew said hurrah… Because Epstein was every dodgy businessman or sheikh that Andrew had ever wanted” whilst former Vanity Fair editor Tina Brown pointedly added:

     

    “The other great glue between them was Andrew’s sex life… Epstein was very good at making him feel like he was incredibly important… For Andrew it was heaven [being with Epstein in New Mexico, New York and Palm Beach). He could behave as he liked behind closed doors… His decision to do that interview [with the BBC’s Newsnight] was the most unbelievable act of self-destruction… Andrew strapped on a suicide vest.”

     

    It is now time for the sidekick of the help-herself-to-anything-that-is-not-pinned-down grifter Sarah, Duchess of York to do the decent thing. It is time for this international embarrassment to fly to America and it is time for him to tell the truth what he knows about his chums – including also Bill Clinton, Kevin Spacey and Donald Trump – to the FBI. Given his previous form, we all know that of course he won’t.

     

    Central Park 2010
    Arresting Andy – That neither Prince Andrew nor Jeffrey Epstein supposedly ever smoked, drank alcohol or took drugs is one thing, that they wore matching coats is another (as pictured when they walked in Central Park, New York in 2010); now, though, it seems the randy royal may face have to deal with more serious woes caused by his similarities of character to the croaked paedophile.
    Waving
    The Duke of York was rightly included in the funeral of his majestic mother, though also rightly not in a prominent manner. That he was snapped waving at photographers and public as if he was Kim Kardashian or Paris Hilton, however, was indicative that this the rotten ratbag is just as arrogant as he has always been. He should now not be seen and most certainly not heard.
    Arresting Andy – In February 2020, ‘The Steeple Times’ reported on croaked paedophile Jeffrey Epstein’s chum (and his wife Sarah, Duchess of York’s financial sponsor) Prince Andrew having alleged fraudster Bernie Ecclestone – who is currently on trial for allegedly trying to hide £400 million in assets from HMRC – over to Royal Lodge, Windsor to celebrate his birthday. Whether this man “with qualities that would make Leona Helmsley look generous” brought Sloppy Giuseppes from Pizza Express (Woking branch) for the bash remains still unknown. It is clear that the duke’s choices of friends, amongst them also despots and those of questionable financial means, remains as questionable as his arrogant behaviour to those he views to be beneath him.
    Whilst Lady Victoria Hervey may peddle her belief that the photograph taken of Prince Andrew, the then Virginia Roberts and Ghislaine Maxwell at 44 Kinnerton Street, Belgravia, London, SW1 on the evening of the 10th March 2001 is a fake, others including the photographer who photographed the original photograph in 2011, New Zealander Michael Thomas, takes an entirely different view. Speaking to the ‘New Zealand Herald’ in February, Thomas remarked: “As I have said before, it was just an ordinary photo you would have got from a chemist in the days of negatives. Surely, if it was fake, every media outlet in the world would be getting sued for using it. The fact that isn’t happening, to me says everything.” Of the image, previously in 2019, Thomas commented: “It wasn’t like she pulled the photo of Prince Andrew out, it was just in among the rest of them. They were just typical teenage snaps. There’s no way that photo is fake.”
    Spencer Kuvin
    Lawyer Spencer Kuvin has claimed that the FBI will be going after the Duke of York and others over their links to Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. It seems unlikely that any charges will be brought against the rotten royal, but others might well get thrown under the bus including Woody Allen, Bill Clinton, Alan Dershowitz, Kevin Spacey, Donald Trump and Leslie Wexner.
  • Libelled Out – Madeleine McCann’s Parents Lose Libel Case In Highest Court In Europe

    Libelled Out – Madeleine McCann’s Parents Lose Libel Case In Highest Court In Europe

    As Gerry and Kate McCann lose their libel case in the European Court of Human Rights, it is time for the pointless and totally wasteful £14 million search for their daughter to finally wind down

    This morning in Strasbourg, the European Court of Rights unsurprisingly ruled against Gerry and Kate McCann, the parents of the ‘missing’ since 2007 child Madeleine McCann, and in favour of the “thorn in their side” ex PJ police coordinator Gonçalo Amaral.

     

    Bringing an end to an almighty and very costly charade where costs and damages will likely run into the hundreds of thousands for the McCanns and their foundation, Mr Amaral’s victory in this highest of courts ends the prospects of the British couple being able to pursue him further.

     

    In a judgment issued online, “the European Court of Human Rights held, unanimously, that there had been: no violation of Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life) of the European Convention on Human Rights.”

     

    Going further, the court added:

     

    “The case concerned statements made by a former detective inspector – in a book, a documentary and a newspaper interview – about the applicants’ alleged involvement in the disappearance of their daughter, Madeleine McCann, who went missing on 3 May 2007 in southern Portugal. Before the Court, the applicants alleged that there had been a violation of their right to reputation and to their right to be presumed innocent.”

     

    “The Court considered that, even assuming that the applicants’ reputation had been damaged, this was not on account of the argument put forward by the book’s author but rather as a result of the suspicions expressed against them, which had led to their being placed under investigation in the course of the criminal investigation (the prosecutor’s office decided to take no further action in July 2008) and had led to intense media attention and much controversy.”

     

    “The information had thus been brought to the public’s attention in some detail even before the investigation file was made available to the media and the book in question was published. It followed that the national authorities had not failed in their positive obligation to protect the applicants’ right to respect for their private life.”

     

    “The Court also considered that in the Supreme Court’s judgments of January and March 2017 – concerning the civil claims lodged by the applicants – it had not made comments implying any guilt on the part of the applicants or even suggesting suspicions against them with regard to the circumstances in which their daughter had disappeared. The applicants’ complaint concerning their right to be presumed innocent was thus manifestly ill-founded.”

     

    Responding, journalist and anti-corruption in charity campaigner Matthew Steeples, who has written extensively about the case since 2007 and who was introduced to Mr and Mrs McCann by the “Chanel-clad” former charity boss Baroness Meyer remarked:

     

    “The vexatiously litigious McCanns have failed in their efforts to sully the name of Gonçalo Amaral. They have, with clear tenacity, gone after this Portuguese police officer again and again since 2008 and when Portugal’s highest court ruled that he was entitled to ‘freedom of expression’ in 2017, they still did not give up.”

     

    “Today, having wasted yet more money in regard to a case of a ‘missing person’ who will likely never be found on top of the £14 million ($16 million, €15.9 million or درهم58.8 million) of public money already squandered, I suggest that it is time for this merry-go-round to stop and it is also time for Mr Amaral to be left in peace.”

     

    “Whatever occurred on the evening of 3rd May 2007 in Praia da Luz, Portugal was most certainly a tragedy and a tragedy most definitely for Madeleine McCann – a 3-year-old child who had a full life ahead of her. It was right that the case was investigated, but over 15 years have passed.”

     

    “As I have said again and again, there are other missing people out there and there are cases that with resources could and can be solved. These cases get little to no support and the disproportionate allocation of resources to the search for Madeleine McCann – a child who would by now be an 18-year-old adult – is clearly never going to lead anywhere.”

     

    “Enough is enough. The end of the road has been reached and it is time that the Metropolitan Police finally wound down the disgraceful waste of money and resources that is Operation Grange.”

     

    Meanwhile elsewhere, again today, we remind readers that Christian Brueckner – the current main ‘suspect’ in the case – has still not been charged. Strange that; very strange indeed.

     

    Pictured top – ‘Missing’ since 3rd May 2007 Madeleine McCann (left) as a child and her parents out running in the days after their daughter supposedly vanished off-the-face of the planet.

     

    Gonçalo Amaral
    Gonçalo Amaral was again victorious after the ECHR decided in favour of the Portuguese civil courts being right in their decision.
    ECHR
    The European Court of Human Rights tossed out Mr and Mrs McCann’s case against Portuguese detective Gonçalo Amaral on Tuesday 20th September 2022 as utterly meritless. This undignified pair should now see sense and put up and shut up.
    Case notes
    The information shared by the court prior to judgment clearly explains the details of the longstanding dispute in question.

    Missing Madeleine – Questions STILL without Answers

    Many questions about what happened on the evening of the disappearance of Madeleine McCann remain. Some that have been highlighted by the press and discussed online include:

    • Why did Kate McCann refuse to answer 48 questions put to her by the Portuguese police?

     

    • Why were certain records of phone calls on the evening of the disappearance “whoosh-clunked” from the memories of the phones of Mr and Mrs McCann and the ‘Tapas 7’?

     

    • Why were relevant mobile phone records never handed over to the authorities in spite of them potentially being useful to the search?

     

    • Why did the couple not use the babysitting service on offer in the holiday resort on the evening of 3rd May 2007 when they went out on the razzle dazzle with friends?

     

    • Why was the door to the apartment – which opened directly onto a public highway – left unlocked with three children aged under three years old alone inside?

     

    • Why did a British sniffer dog sense the smell of a corpse in a cupboard in the apartment from which Madeleine McCann disappeared?

     

    • Why did a sniffer dog also supposedly sense the smell of a corpse in a vehicle hired by the couple a month after the disappearance of their daughter?

     

    • Why did the McCanns repeatedly try to discredit the work of the sniffer dogs and their handlers?

     

     

     

    • Why have the McCanns attempted to ‘gag’ anyone who disputes their version of events – most especially Gonçalo Amaral?

     

    • Why given over £14 million has been spent on this search to date has nobody come forward with any sighting of ‘missing’ Madeleine McCann given the rewards on offer?

     

    In December 2017, when £11 million of British taxpayers’ money had been spent towards the search for ‘missing’ Madeleine McCann, 86% of viewers of ITV1’s ‘Loose Women’ said the public purse should cease to fund the investigation. Now, in September 2022, with that sum now well in excess of £14 million (aside from the millions in private money also), it is time to allocate resources to the search for missing people who actually can be found, we would suggest.
  • Moron of the Moment 2022 – Disgusting Queen Baiting Owen Jones

    Moron of the Moment 2022 – Disgusting Queen Baiting Owen Jones

    After rightly being crucified for baiting after the death of the Queen, rabid ranter Owen Jones today deservedly comes under fire from the gay community also

    Last week just prior to the death of Her Majesty The Queen, the pesky Poundland poison pen that is Owen Jones took to Twitter to brag: “OK, so something very big is about to happen.”

     

    Two hours later, this intentionally irksome journalist and author added: “It turns out the Queen is alive so stand down.” Subsequently, when the monarch passed this self-attention seeking scumbag added decided to make a fuss about the “mass cancellation of events” causing a “sudden loss of income for many people who are low-paid in insecure work” and demanded a “compensation further.”

     

    Going further against the national mood of mourning, he complained of “these mass cancellations” not being “even in accordance with government guidance” and “completely unnecessary.” Deservedly “crucified” by the Twitterati, this boring berk then ludicrously added:

     

    “Actually, no. I am going to post this. The Daily Mail et al are now going to scour the timelines of everyone and anyone that can construe as leftwing for content they can outrage their readers. If you are on the receiving end of this you, cannot imagine what will hit you.”

     

    “You could lose your job, be plastered across the Internet forever, and you could be subjected to very extreme threats of violence and death – and there are people in this country who may try and act on these. Don’t make yourself Daily Mail fodder! This might even be just for being a bit sarcastic or flippant, rather than something really OTT. It isn’t worth it!”

     

    Unsurprisingly, just as occurred with this ‘angry man’ and Waitrose hating rent-a-gob in July, was slammed as “insensitive” and “out-of-touch,” but again he’s ranting and raving on Twitter at it again.

     

    Turning his vicious tongue to the LGBTQ community despite being openly gay himself, Jones condemned an Australian gay man as a “bigot” and “anti-trans activist.” He described @Danfromsydney as being from a “cult” of “pariahs” and a “weirdo.”

     

    Who on earth will this cretinous creep go for next? Equally, before anyone forgets this gobby grifter was deservedly called out previously by Guido Fawkes for his hypocrisy over his income in 2015 – when it was suggested he’d earnt well over £500,000 in just 12 short months – and more recently was outed for “bullying colleagues and showing a lack of professionalism” and “stoking up internal disputes” in April this year.

     

    Owen Jones – whom tennis legend Martina Navratilova once called “truly despicable” – is a total disgrace and it is now time that this tittle-tattling twerp was simply turned ‘orf for once and for all.

     

    The wacky and worst words of the author of ‘Chavs’ and ‘The Establishment: And how they get away with it’

    On capitalism – “Based on a myth: that thriving private entrepreneurs generate wealth through their own hard work, innovation and get-up-and-go.”

    Of changing his mind – “Everyone is entitled to change their mind when the facts.”

    Of the much ridiculed ‘comedian’ Russell Brand – “Our generation’s [George] Orwell.”

    Of the much-loved war hero Sir Winston Churchill – “[It’s a] fact… [He] oversaw the death of three million people.”

    On the class system – “Chav-bashing draws on a long, ignoble tradition of class hatred. But it cannot be understood without looking at more recent events. Above all, it is the bastard child of a very British class war.”

    On Jeremy Corbyn and Corbynism – “[People] had been waiting for a long time for something like Corbynism to happen. They felt something had to give. There were so many people who wanted a genuine radical alternative. Against that, there were many diehard opponents of Corbynism, many of them within the Labour party, who thought, and still think, that it was a moral outrage and an aberration and that anyone involved in it should just go and die in a ditch.”

    On Jeremy Corbyn’s supposed support for those the rational majority would consider terrorists – “No one has [been] killed by a wreath.”

    On the establishment – One day, this Establishment will fall… For those of us who want a different sort of society, it is surely time to get our act together.”

    On free markets – “A creed that stirs up near religious devotion among its believers. It is in fact a con, a myth, a great deception.”

    On the late reality television ‘star’ Jade Goody – “What does the case of Jade Goody show us, other than the capacity of the British media for crassness and cruelty? Above all it demonstrated that it is possible to say practically anything about people from Jade’s background. They are fair game.”

    On himself – “People might think I am overconfident. I look petulant when I stand my ground.”

    Of the Labour party (he supposedly once loved) – “The parliamentary Labour party meetings were just brutal and gruesome. A lot of those people in the parliamentary Labour party – I’m just going to say it – are jumped-up thugs. Vicious, horrible people. They would sanctimoniously stand up and talk about the authoritarianism of Corbynism as they screeched like disturbed teenagers, spraying spittle at anyone with the temerity to support the elected leadership of the party of which they were members. I really don’t know what they are driven by.”

    On his life thus far – “It was bloody hard, but it would have been far worse to wallo.”

    On millennials – “Better to be seen as victim than the aggressor [in the] brutal battleground of the culture war.”

    On politics in general – “A brutal business… The last few years have been like a Quentin Tarantino movie.”

    On far-left politics in the 2020s – “The idea… is viable.”

    Of his politics and writing – “I am a man of the left and I will always write from that perspective.”

    Of political reporting – “Too often trivialised, treated as a soap opera based in Westminster.”

    Of private education – “Private schools do confer other advantages, of course: whether be it networks, or a sense of confidence that can shade into a poisonous sense of social superiority.”

    On sneering sorts – “A sneer can often reveal far more about the sneerer than the object of their derision.”

    Of Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer MP – “A professional political conman… [who is] not someone anyone can trust.”

    On his own “wants” (in 2019) – “For much-loved pop stars to stop being inadvertent propogandists for mass-murdering dictatorships.”

    On those of wealthy parentage – “If you are dim but have rich parents, a life of comfort, affluence and power is almost inevitable – while the bright but poor are systematically robbed of their potential.”

    What others think of the “Witchfinder General” Owen Jones…

    Olympian Sharon Davies MBE – “No victim.”

    According to Fox News – “A braying jackal.”

    Colleagues at The Guardian – “Lacking professionalism… [Stoked up] internal disputes.”

    Author and journalist Douglas Murray – “[Like] a young child in a classroom letting off a stink bomb.”

    Tennis superstar Martina Navratilova – “Truly despicable.”

    Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer – “I’m not focused on Owen. I’m sorry Owen. I know Owen.”

    And finally, the thoughts of some on Twitter… “He needs to stop doing the blow” and “an absolute helmet.”

  • Mind-Blowing, Moaning, Money Motivated Meghan Markle… Or Just A Predictably Petulant Princess?

    Mind-Blowing, Moaning, Money Motivated Meghan Markle… Or Just A Predictably Petulant Princess?

    Is it that mind-blowing that the Duchess of Sussex thinks she’s helping her cause with her latest antics? Isn’t this just instead yet another predictable example of her showing her truly self-serving character?

    Deservedly condemned by Tom Bower in Revenge: Meghan, Harry and the war between the Windsors and hinted at as potentially a “yacht girl” for Prince Andrew by Kirby Sommers in July, the mendacious minx formerly known as Meghan Markle has very predictably scored multiple further own goals in recent days. Why, given her past form, anyone is surprised however is quite beyond comprehension.

     

    Aside from condescendingly comparing herself to Nelson Mandela – for which she unsurprisingly got slammed by the late South African president’s grandson Zwelivelile Mandela – the Duchess of Sussex was also called out as not having “an iota of common sense” by the New York Post’s Maureen Callahan.

     

    Going further, in an opinion piece widely saluted titled “Toddler and tiara: Meghan Markle STILL throwing tantrums about royal family,” Callahan added:

     

    “This woman has nothing to say. She has nothing to offer, no original thoughts or guiding philosophy, no earthly reason to be taking so much money from, and so much space in, the mainstream media she so clearly despises.”

     

    Summing her up as “the Greta Garbo of Montecito,” a new “Queen of All Things Sufferable” and “the Petulant Princess,” the award winning “Top 50 Power Women 2016” journalist amongst other things suggested:

     

    “I must concede her lone accomplishment here: Just when you think Meghan Markle can’t get any more delusional, she outdoes herself. Her self-regard runs in direct opposition to her waning relevance. She clearly has no real friends left — or even decent publicists… Meghan is an inveterate liar.”

     

    “What will make Meghan happy? Hell if she knows. The only solace she finds from this existential torment, it seems, is sitting for fancy photo shoots and talking to friendly journalists.”

     

    “Left to her own devices here, Meghan returns to her default mode, perseverating over the Queen’s refusal to give her and Harry everything they wanted: namely, to monetize [sic] their royal status while owing nothing in public service.”

     

    “’I think forgiveness is really important,’ Meghan says, adding that she has ‘a lot to say until I don’t. Sometimes, as they say, the silent part is still part of the song.’ Meghan Markle, two very weary nations beg you: Please. Be that silent part.”

     

    Though outrage at the conduct of the Duchess of Sussex and ultimately also her drip of a husband towards the Queen and other members of both the House of Windsor and her own birth family is understandable, this ridiculous woman is simply incapable of accepting that it is her that is at fault. It seems that ambitious and audacious ‘MeGain’ will stop at nothing to achieve her next goal – the keys to the White House.

     

    Banana
    Known for slipping on proverbial bananas – as well as writing patronising messages on them to prostitutes – the wife of Prince Charles’s second son is clearly on a path where she will create more embarrassment and bring yet more havoc to both her marital and birth families. It is an outrage that nobody urges her to see sense and teaches her to behave with a modicum of decorum and an ounce of decency.
    Here is a woman who won’t stop until she next seizes high office. It is clear that a political career is very much on the agenda of this self-obsessed ex-D-list actress.

    Can anyone solve a problem like ‘Mind-Blowing MeGain’?

    • In November 2021, the duchess was forced to apologise to the Appeal Court in London for making a misleading statement in her privacy case against The Mail on Sunday’s publishers.
    • Her very own father, Thomas, has called out her many untruths about him and others again, again and again.
    • Of her claiming having got married the day before she actually did, Mr Markle stated: “Lying about the archbishop? How can you say: ‘We’ve been married three days before we got married’? Her lies are so obvious, I don’t know why she says them.”
    • Her very own half-sister, Samantha, who is currently bringing a defamation case against her, has called her out as a liar on multiple occasions also. It has been proven that the duchess’s claim that she hasn’t seen her sibling in over 20 years was proven untrue when a photo of the pair 13 years ago emerged.
    • Her very own half-brother, Thomas Jr., said of her: “I told Prince Harry, I think she’s going to ruin your life. She’s very shallow… She’s a phony, a bully, a jaded, shallow, conceited woman.”
    • The former Meghan Markle has been called out on multiple occasions for spinning stories against other members of the royal family, most especially the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge.
    • Staff who’ve worked for her have complained that she is a bully and investigations into this remain ongoing.
    • The Duchess of Sussex is a known manipulator of the press and paparazzis and it has been claimed that she’ll “twist the truth” to get any headline she wants.
    • Questions remain as to how many times she’s actually been married in total. Some say twice, some say thrice.
    • “Would you trust this woman with a bargepole?” is something often asked of this money motivated minx.

     

    Twitter reacts to ‘MeGain’s’ latest antics…

    Tweet 5
    Tweet 3
    Tweet 2
    Tweet 1