Category: Deranged Divas

Monster of the Moment 2022 – Vile Ferne McCann Exposed For Attacking Acid Attack Victims
Be sure to follow @ladywhistledown195 on Instagram; you’ll learn plenty about Ferne McCann’s vile views about her acid chucking ex-fiancé and her abhorrent views about his 16 innocent victims

The Instagram account of the moment to follow is undoubtedly an anonymous one that uses the handle @ladywhistledown195. Whether or not the content it shares is genuine has been questioned, but the voice of the person it has recordings of sounds very, very genuine.

In spite of having made just four posts since its first on 28^th September, this account has attracted over 66,700 followers. It has come to prominence after using the ‘stories’ function to release voice notes supposedly recorded by ITV television presenter Ferne McCann and boy are they shocking, disgusting and outrageous.

In them, someone believed to be moronic and mouthy Miss McCann – a woman with a child by a menace-not-a-man named Arthur Collins (who is in jail for 20 years for throwing acid over 16 individuals in 2017) – references her ex-lover’s past and her ex-lover’s victims.

Of one innocent victim, Sophie Hall, a poor lady left scarred for life, deciding to enter a beauty contest, a woman generally believed to be McCann is heard to say:

“I don’t know whether to laugh or cry, the silly b*tch has made a dress… A papier- mâché dress out of the newspaper cuttings from the [acid throwing incident] event.”

“She’ll probably win it, I’m not gonna [sic] lie, only because the event and the awards that she has entered or beauty competition, whatever it is.”

‘They’re probably loving all this free press for their event so they’ll probably fix it, she’ll win it.”

Responding, victim Miss Hall has spoken to various publications and variously commented:

“I’m in a state of shock and disbelief.”

“Ferne herself has said before that she struggles with her own appearance. So, to be commenting on how someone else looks –regardless if it was never meant to be heard – is wrong.”

“This is me fighting back and remaining strong. I want them to know we should be proud of our scars because they are a reminder of how strong we are.”

“I would ask Ferne: ‘What have I ever done to you? Why are you targeting me, when all I’ve been trying to do is make a positive out of a terrible and traumatic experience that I sincerely hope no one ever has to go through in their lifetime?’”

“I wanted to have a positive impact and perhaps inspire people and not only build my confidence, but help other victims out there that may be having a tough time and to show that you can still go on and achieve fantastic things.”

“There’s so much to overcome and I’ve found there’s lots of rounds in this competition that you have to take part in and it has helped me rebuild different parts of my life – it’s helped me massively.”

Reporting on the vile notes, the MailOnline’s Joanna Crawley quoted an unnamed ‘source’ who concluded: “Ferne has reportedly been left devastated by the leaked notes and ‘can’t stop crying’ as she has received backlash from fans online.”

Perhaps, instead of crying only after being caught, Miss McCann ought to do the decent thing and stop attacking the sixteen innocent people whose lives were ruined by her ex-lover and ‘baby dada.’

Shame on Ferne McCann and shame on all of those – most especially ITV (a channel that has also given the violent criminal abuser Boy George a platform) – that have and continue to enable this wicked woman to profit from the pain of others. It is time she did the decent thing and that is to learn the art of an apology.

Pictured Top – Ferne McCann and Arthur Collins sold news of their impending-never-to-happen wedding to ‘OK!’ in April 2017 (left) just days before Collins went on the rampage chucking acid over innocent people in a nightclub; later this washed-up-wastrel woman was snapped smashed-off-her-skull (right).

Editor’s Note – Unlike as is the case in many publications, this article was NOT sponsored or supported by a third-party.

When mentally challenged Arthur Collins decided to hurl acid over people he had utterly no connection to, he wore a T-shirt emblazoned with the words: “Candy Killer.” He wore the same item of clothing previously whilst on holiday in Dubai previously when posing in a Rolls-Royce alongside the warped-of-mind woman he never got to actually marry, Ferne McCann.

In December 2018, McCann – who very inappropriately took to Instagram to flog lip plumping primers on the day the father of her child was jailed in December 2017 – appeared on ITV’s ‘Loose Women’ with the creepy Christian crooner Sir Cliff Richard. Her latest scandal involving ‘victim shaming’ presents this wicked woman for exactly what she is – sick, twisted and frankly repugnant.

The injuries suffered by victims of the ‘despicable’ acid attack at Mangle, Dalston, London, E8 on 17^th April 2017

In December 2017, then 25-year-old Arthur Collins was jailed for 20 years with an extra 5 years on licence at Wood Green Crown Court. He had been convicted in November that year of 5 counts of grievous bodily harm with intent and 9 counts of actual bodily harm.

At the time, Judge Noel Lucas QC remarked: “Your case has attracted a great deal of public interest. This is because what you did at the Mangle club… was a despicable act” before praising the “extraordinary courage” of victims Phoebe Giorgiu, Lauren Trent and Sophie Hall.

Collins, a vile toerag deemed to have a “low IQ that bordered on a learning disability,” was told “he had demonstrated not the least remorse for his actions, which injured 14 people” before he was deservedly sent down, The Guardian reported.

The graphic injuries suffered by the victims of Arthur Collins…

In December 2017, Neal Baker of The Sun detailed the “horrifying extent of the injuries” of the 16 victims whose lives the deranged deviant Arthur Collins changed forever.

Baker noted:
- Victim 1: A 29-year-old man, suffered second degree chemical burns to left side of the face, including cheek, eye, eyelids and lips. His wounds extended from right temple and forehead, across the bridge of his nose and into the left eyebrow.
- Victim 2: A 24-year-old man, suffered third degree chemical burn injuries to the left side of face, ear, neck and shoulder area. One and a half per cent of total body surface area affected. A skin graft was required.
- Victim 3: A 21-year-old man, sustained chemical burns, to right cheek, lower left cheek, and anterior neck with additional areas to his left check and left arm and hand. Six per cent of the total body surface area affected.
- Victim 4: A 21-year-old woman, suffered chemical burns, on nose and cheeks extending onto lips, on her left shoulder extending to her left breast. Multiple small blistered areas affecting her neck, upper chest and upper limbs. A corneal abrasion (scratch on eye) with chemical conjunctivitis.
- Victim 5: A 23-year-old woman, suffered chemical burns, affecting chest, breasts, neck and upper left arm. Three per cent of total body surface area affected. Surgical intervention to treat abscess infection resulting in a further week in hospital subsequent to her discharge.
- Victim 6: A 22-year-old woman, sustained chemical burns, affecting neck, upper chest, abdomen and lower limbs.
- Victim 7: A 23-year-old woman, suffered chemical burns, affected forehead and swollen left eye and corneal abrasion.
- Victim 8: A 29-year-old man, suffered chemical burns, splash marks over his face.
- Victim 9: A 25-year-old man, sustained first degree chemical burns to right cheek and neck and upper limbs.
- Victim 10: A 20-year-old woman, suffered chemical burns to right shoulder and back.
- Victim 11: A 25-year-old woman, sustained reddening and irritation to skin on foot.
- Victim 12: A 24-year-old woman, suffered chemical burns, splash marks affected posterior and left lower leg. One per cent of total body surface area affected.
- Victim 13: A 22-year-old woman, suffered burn splash marks on the back of her right leg.
- Victim 14: A 23-year-old man, sustained chemical burns, corneal injury with cloudiness in the right eye.
- Victim 15: A 19-year-old woman, suffered chemical burns on her left leg.
- Victim 16: A 23-year-old woman, suffered chemical burns, splash marks to left arm, shoulder and forehead.
The Instagram posts of @ladywhistledown195…
November 11, 2022
Spare Us Meghan Markle – Samantha Markle On Prince Harry’s ‘Spare’

WORLD EXCLUSIVE – Samantha Markle shares her thoughts on Prince Harry’s tittle-tattling tome ‘Spare’ with ‘The Steeple Times’; she slams it as likely “cold, malicious and reckless” and wishes he’d “spare us all the hypocritical pity party”

Following on from our interview with Samantha Markle yesterday – quoted extensively elsewhere including by Richard Eden for the Daily Mail and Jack Wright for MailOnline this morning – we today publish the thoughts of the estranged half-sister of the Duchess of Sussex on her husband’s forthcoming tittle-tattling tome, Spare.

In comments exclusively to The Steeple Times via email, Ms. Markle observed:

“With regard to the book Spare, I have [like the rest of the planet, obviously] not read it [yet], but the idea that there was an alleged request or appeal for money between Harry and King Charles and when King Charles turned him down, reportedly he said he would go ahead with the book seems like extortion on the surface and blackmail.”

“We can only hope that the book will not be slanderous and scandalous, but after everything that has transpired it seems like such a cold, malicious and reckless disregard for his own family especially the father who has given him everything. Just like my father gave my sister everything, they seem to be two peas in a pod where using and disposing of others, when they don’t get their way is concerned. Some people are not capable of empathy remorse shame or gratitude.”

“In all of the pictures that were salient in the media throughout his life, Harry never seemed to be unhappy as a member of the royal family so [his] statement now does not intersect with visible evidence of a lifespan.”

“Many around the world have noticed the same thing. it almost seems like grasping for straws as a coping strategy for the discomfort of being in denial.”

“More than anything what is glaring is that while he posits the idea of mental health as being so important, neither he nor my sister seem to have any regard for the mental health of their families and others whom they have stepped on. They preach about peoples’ voices needing to be heard but they don’t care about the voices of those whom they have knowingly wronged. Their hypocrisy has been noted globally.”

“Prince William has honoured the legacy of his mother beautifully and carried on with integrity and loyalty. [He understands the concept of] role models [and the] importance of family. Prince Harry, on the other hand, seems to use the victim card as a crutch for accountability and integrity in every area of his life, in my opinion. I like the title of the book only in that maybe he should ‘spare’ us all the hypocritical pity party.”

Turning to her thoughts on the reaction to her interview yesterday with The Steeple Times, Ms. Markle concluded:

“This was an excellent article and I’m so grateful to you for your objective, honest overview.”

“Everyone else was afraid to tell the truth and an attorney in London told me that there was an entrenched media agenda against me. PRs were being paid to write nasty articles about me and everytime I would speak the truth, it never got printed.”

Follow Samantha Markle on Twitter at @SammyMarkleReal.

Pictured top – Samantha Markle (left); The Duke of Sussex’s book has already been embarrassingly reduced to the bargain basement bin at Waterstones – where it is priced at £14 down from £28 (centre); the mendacious menace, the Duchess of Sussex, will no doubt be less than amused to learn of the bookseller’s move and of her sibling’s latest comments.

With his tackily titled book already in the half-price bargain basement bin, the Duke of Sussex will likely to turn to the rotten weasel PR peddler Omid Scobie to help him flog a few extra copies.

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex will no doubt also engage the vile trashbag troll Christopher Bouzy also. He was quite rightly called out by Samantha Markle yesterday and currently, very deservedly, also has legal troubles of his own.

Another oddity the pair could turn to for assistance in PR-ing the pointless, pitiful book is Markus Anderson. A PR party or two at Soho House, perhaps?

On Twitter, the half-sibling of the Duchess of Sussex slammed her and stated: “My grandmother would roll over in her grave to see what my sister has done to this family and I think it disgraces the family name. My dad worked very hard at his craft and did a sensational job, to give us the life that we had. #Markle.”

Going further, Samantha Markle modestly added: “And like any family, we are not perfect, but we are far from what the media have portrayed us as and did not deserve that. It’s OK, what doesn’t kill you makes you stronger and we all know it gives us a great sense of humour!”

November 2, 2022
Samantha Markle Speaks – Samantha Markle Returns To Twitter
WORLD EXCLUSIVE – ‘The Steeple Times’ interviews Samantha Markle – the sensible sister of the mendacious meddler formerly known as Meghan Markle – as she returns to Twitter courtesy of Elon Musk’s reopening of the social media network

Samantha Markle, like her father, did not choose the glare of public spotlight. Forced into it courtesy of her heartless half-sister ‘bagging’ Prince Harry in 2019 and then treated like a pariah by this mendacious meddling actress turned international nuisance, here is a lady who, like many, got quite disgracefully deplatformed by the woke wazzocks who formerly controlled Twitter.

Now, courtesy of Elon Musk taking ownership in the last week, the elder sibling of the Duchess of Sussex has been quite justifiably allowed to return to the medium.

Asked of what she thought of joining Kanye West in getting back into the Twittersphere, Ms Markle – who submitted court filings earlier this month that suggested she’d had her “life turned upside down by the royal sister’s faithful fans and others” – exclusively told The Steeple Times:

“Thank you so much Matthew! My dad is making good strides daily and that’s a blessing! Thank you for asking!”

“I am really happy to be on Twitter after being unjustly targeted and shut down by bots and trolls falsely reporting my account. Prior to that I was hacked out of several accounts, so they tried to spin information to look like I was circumventing.”

“Chris Bouzy and Twitter trolls bragged and took credit for getting me shut down.”

“The only time I was legitimately restricted on Twitter was for mentioning Ivermectin because I shared a medical article about it. Medical articles are not disinformation.”

“I’m glad that Elon musk is going to save free speech and [turn] Twitter into a greater platform than it has ever been. We can all have our opinions, and disagree. Elon Musk wants to make it fair for both the right and the left equally. Differing opinions and controversy make people think and grow.”

“If we all agreed, we would never grow. The free flow of information is critical to progress, and people should be allowed to process it independently rather than being censored or brainwashed.”

“I believe that this will be a historically positive change for our social and economic world. That free flow of information being taken out of the hands of the radically oppressive left will allow us to thrive as a society and as an economy. I think it’s going to be very exciting! I’d like to see Elon Musk buy Google!”

Somewhat controversially, before signing off, she added:

“And let’s not forget Donald Trump is going to get the world back on the right track.”

Watch out ‘MeGain’ – Your sensible sister Samantha was never going to be silenced and as much as you wish to spin out nonsense in Spare, the world will be watching and waiting as you yet again bring shame on the hapless House of Sussex.

Follow Samantha Markle on Twitter at @SammyMarkleReal.

The half-sister of the Duchess of Sussex now has her account back. We urge readers to join us in following her as she takes on a sibling whose antics are quite frankly nothing other than noxious.

The two sisters pictured together in happier times. How different things could have been if Prince Harry’s wicked wife had simply included her birth family in the fold.

Prince Harry’s wife is attempting to block her half-sister from deposing him and her father Thomas in her defamation lawsuit it was reported earlier this month. According to ‘Hello!’ earlier this month: “[Her legal team] have requested a judge stop the process of collecting and releasing evidence until a ruling on whether the lawsuit should be entirely thrown out. They argue that Meghan’s statements about her relationship with Samantha are ‘non-actionable opinion that are also substantially true… A deposition of Mr. Markle at this juncture, along with other discovery, would be an unnecessary spectacle and waste of the parties’ time, money, and resources,’ their filing read, via the publication. ‘[Samantha Markle] should not be permitted to force Meghan and, potentially, numerous non-parties to devote substantial resources to extraneous discovery while a meritorious motion that could dispose of the entire case is pending.’”

What’s the truth about the stories that abound about the Duchess of Sussex?
- In November 2021, the duchess was forced to apologise to the Appeal Court in London for making a misleading statement in her privacy case against The Mail on Sunday’s publishers.
- Her very own father, Thomas, has called out her many untruths about him and others again, again and again.
- Of her claiming having got married the day before she actually did, Mr Markle stated: “Lying about the archbishop? How can you say: ‘We’ve been married three days before we got married’? Her lies are so obvious, I don’t know why she says them.”
- Her very own half-sister, Samantha, who is currently bringing a defamation case against her, has called her out as a liar on multiple occasions also. It has been shown that the duchess’s claim that she hasn’t seen her sibling in over 20 years was proven untrue when a photo of the pair 13 years ago emerged.
- Her very own half-brother, Thomas Jr., said of her: “I told Prince Harry, I think she’s going to ruin your life. She’s very shallow… She’s a phony, a bully, a jaded, shallow, conceited woman.”
- The wife of Prince Harry has been called out on multiple occasions for spinning stories against other members of the royal family, most especially the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge.
- Staff who’ve worked for her have complained that she is a bully and investigations into this remain ongoing.
- The Duchess of Sussex is a known manipulator of the press and paparazzis and it has been claimed that she’ll “twist the truth” to get any headline she wants.
- Questions remain as to how many times she’s actually been married in total. Some say twice, some say thrice.
- Did the ‘Montecito Meddler’ meet Prince Andrew or Prince Harry first? Rumours abound that she could have spent time and holidayed with the former as long ago as 2001 and that her claim to have no prior knowledge of the royal family until 2016 is just utter baloney.
- “Would you trust this woman with a bargepole?” is something often asked of this money motivated menace.
November 1, 2022
Taking Everyone Down Maxwell Style
Prince Andrew’s second cousin calls out Daphne Barak’s ‘interviews’ with mucky madam Ghislaine Maxwell as “self-serving” and her way of “taking everyone down with her”

Hillary Clinton mouthpiece Daphne Barak’s ‘interviews’ with convicted sex trafficking nonce Ghislaine Maxwell have gone down like a lead balloon with Christina Oxenberg, a second cousin of Prince Andrew.

Speaking to The U.S. Sun about what she views as a pair of “self-serving” interviews by Jeffrey Epstein’s co-collaborator in multiple abuse of multiple victims, Oxenberg remarked:

“They are pretending that they’re on [Prince Andrew’s] side and they’re helping him and they’re working with him. They’re not at all, this is entirely self-serving.”

“He doesn’t need any more help from Ghislaine. Here they are saying: ‘We’re gonna prove that the photograph is not real.’ It doesn’t really matter anymore. He’s already paid the money.”

“This is her way of pretending she’s helping him, and he’s buying it.”

“She says there are 50 points wrong with the photograph, that’s how liars speak.”

“A truthful person would say: ‘The three of us were never in that house. So, it’s impossible.’ And she never goes anywhere near that. She’s like: ‘No, look at the shadow on his hand.’”

“She really destroyed the last year of the Queen’s life, making Her Majesty worry about Andrew and the shenanigans and that’s all on Maxwell, she caused all of that distress.”

“And her only motivation is to save herself, meanwhile taking everyone down with her on the way.”

“I wish he would come out and say: ‘I am so sorry [Maxwell] tricked me and I fell for it. I brought disgrace, I brought misery.’”

“But now that I see clearly all I can do is be grateful that I know the truth and cut all ties with Ghislaine and admit my shame and move forward in a positive way.”

“The best thing he could do is have the courage to come out and admit he was used by her. And then he would be free of her. Let her rot in jail and forget about her. And he could start his road to redemption.”

Turning to Maxwell’s comments about her former “friends” President Bill Clinton and President Donald Trump, Oxenberg surmised that she was “’signalling’ to the pair that she still holds the power.” She added:

“She is reminding them who is boss. She’s so sinster and creepy, she’s evil and I won’t drop that stance. She has no remorse.”

“This line that she’s pushing about how any woman could have fallen in love [with a bad guy]. Very few women would agree to commit felonies, multiple felonies for years. There are some, but there are very few. And most are in jail.”

“That is so insulting to say that: ‘Oh, anyone who’s been in a bad relationship.’ First of all, it wasn’t a relationship, it was a job. And she never said she loved him, she tried to get him to marry her.”

Of how the former Oceana ‘charity’ chief will cope in the clink, Oxenberg offered:

“I’m well aware that Ghislaine is a good fit. She’s with her own kind, those with a criminal mind. She’s tough, she’s arrogant and they’ll love her accent, they’ll find it funny. And she’s just going to blame everything on Epstein.”

Previously, in January 2020, Christina Oxenberg told Page Six that she had attended a “ladies’ tea party” in Maxwell’s then home on 79^th Street in New York in 1991 where the mucky madam was dressed in just her knickers and bra.

Of the bizarre encounter – prior to which the ‘Bouncing Czech’s’ deviant daughter had “wailed… ‘I’m poor!’” on the telephone whilst inviting her guest – Oxenberg recalled:

“Ghislaine presided in a white lacy bra and underwear set and lots of jewelry; she jangled as she moved. She explained the lack of clothing was because she was hot and it was summertime. She fanned herself with a copy of Vogue … I can’t remember their names but there were three other females at this tea party. We remained fully clothed.”

Also present was “a baby Yorkshire terrier” named Max, “which Maxwell had been gifted.” Of this Oxenberg observed: “More than once, she threw the quivering little bundle violently across the room. She thought this was hilariously funny.”

Taking everyone down Maxwell style – The deranged deviant, mucky madam with the terrier she is said to have abused just like she abused her victims. Here is a wicked woman allegedly abused by her wicked father who did not know right from wrong and who thus viewed abusing both humans and animals as perfectly normal.

Taking everyone down Maxwell style – The mucky madam with Christina Oxenberg and His Royal Highness Prince Dimitri of Yugoslavia in 2013.

Taking everyone down Maxwell style – The mucky madam with her siblings in London in the summer of 2019.

Key quotes from Daphne Barak’s ‘interviews’ that are more PR peddling spinning than journalistic digging and key questions that arise as a result of this disgraceful PR peddling even being allowed

The recent toady interviews in The Sun on Sunday and The Mail on Sunday by ‘journalist’ Daphne Barak, who seems to like associating with the mates of the mucky madam Maxwell as much as she did herself, have been rightly called out as “poor” and “nothing but PR” by a woman with a goal of “taking everyone down” with her.

Key questions that arise as a result are:
- Why did the American authorities allow a prisoner to give such interviews so soon after her conviction?
- Did the authorities not consider the impact such interviews would have on the victims of this convicted sex trafficking nonce and grubby groping abuser?
- What is the agenda of Daphne Barak and what involvement did Kevin Maxwell and his siblings have in setting up these interviews?
- Did PR peddlers for the mucky madam – such as Brian Basham, Jay Beecher and Ross Gow – have any involvement in the bringing about of these interviews?
- Why did this so-called ‘journalist’ not ask anything about what this mucky madam feels about the impact of her actions on her many victims?
- Why did this so-called ‘journalist’ not ask anything about this mucky madam’s secret marriage to Scott Borgerson in 2015?
- Why did this so-called ‘journalist’ not ask why Ghislaine Maxwell – someone she’s associated with for at least 30 years – hasn’t paid off her debts to her lawyers?
Some quotes from Barak’s clearly biased in favour of assisting Jeffrey Epstein’s one-time-lover and co-abuser’s interviews follow:

Of Prince Andrew:

“I accept that this friendship could not survive my conviction. He is paying such a price for the association. I consider him a dear friend. I care about him.”

Of President Bill Clinton:

“It was a special friendship, which continued over the years. We had lots in common. I feel bad that he is another victim, only because of his association with Jeffrey. I understand he, like others, can no longer consider me as a friend.”

Of Jeffrey Epstein:

“I said in my court statement that meeting Epstein was the greatest mistake of my life. And obviously, if I could go back today, I would avoid meeting him, and I would make different choices.”

Of President Donald Trump:

“We knew each other and mingled in the same circles, in New York, Palm Beach. I was very grateful when he wished me well after (the arrest). He got bad media for it, but he dared, while others didn’t.

“I was honoured he remembered me. Well, he is known to say what he thinks. It gave me a big boost.”

Of other friends and former friends:

“There are people who have disappointed me and there are people I’m surprised have not, you know, been a little more proactive. I completely understand people have livelihoods to protect… children to protect.”

“But having said that, there are people who have stood by me privately. Quite a few, actually, and I’m extremely appreciative of their private support.”

“I have friends who I have literally known my entire life since I was at kindergarten. It’s good to know there are people out there who know who I am, really.”

Of that now infamous photo with Prince Andrew and the then Virginia Roberts at 44 Kinnerton Street, Belgavia in March 2001:

“This photo is not real… There was never an original one produced.”

Names in the firing line most obvious from Ghislaine’s filthy ‘Little Black Book’ as she seeks to minimise her sentence

Ghislaine Maxwell has until June 2023 to cooperate and thus “name names” if she wishes to see her sentence reduced.

Those Scott Borgerson’s estranged wife has been known to associate with – none of whom The Steeple Times is suggesting at this time as having been involved in any of her crimes, but whom she might seek revenge against for not offering her what she might consider enough public or even private support – include:
- Alexander Acosta
- Woody Allen
- Ehud Barak
- Tom Barrack
- Scott Borgerson
- Jean-Luc Brunel (deceased)
- Naomi Campbell
- President Bill Clinton and his wife Hillary
- Alan Dershowitz
- Glenn Dubin and his wife Eva
- Bernie Ecclestone
- Bill Gates
- Geordie Greig
- Countess of Iveagh (AKA Clare Guinness, Clare Hazell)
- Lord Mandelson
- Marvin Minsky
- George J. Mitchell
- Rupert Murdoch
- Elon Musk
- Peter Nygård
- Bill Richardson III
- Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman
- Kevin Spacey
- Jes Staley
- Ken Starr
- President Donald Trump and his potentially trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein wife Melania
- Ivana Trump (deceased)
- Chris Tucker
- Harvey Weinstein
- Leslie Wexner
- Prince Andrew, Duke of York and his live-in ex-wife Sarah, Duchess of York
October 21, 2022
Briefcase Bore – ‘Moaning Meg’ Is A Bimbo And A Bore
The moaning menace Duchess of Sussex’s claims that she was treated as a “bimbo” when working as a ‘briefcase girl’ just prove that she’s a blithering, blubbing bore

The mendacious menace formerly known as Meghan Markle just cannot help but play the victim.

In spite of living in a £14 million ($15.8 million, €16 million or درهم57.9 million) Montecito mansion most people could only dream of and having bagged a royal as her second – possibly third – husband, the Duchess of Sussex just cannot stop moaning and boy does she have the art of whining down to a tee.

In her latest tirade of tediousness, Prince Harry’s petulant partner told Paris Hilton on her Archetypes Spotify podcast that she was treated as a “bimbo” and not “valued specifically for her brain” whilst working on Deal or No Deal as a ‘briefcase girl.’

Yet again proving herself an attention seeker interested in only herself and not an interviewer interested in her subject, the petulant pest bored on:

“There was a very cookie-cutter idea of precisely what we should look like. It was solely about beauty – and not necessarily about brains. When I look back at that time, I’ll never forget this one detail: Moments before we’d get on stage, there was a woman who ran the show and she’d be there backstage, and I can still hear her. She couldn’t properly pronounce my last name at the time and I knew who she was talking to because she’d go, ‘Markle, suck it in! Markle, suck it in!’”

“And by the way, I was surrounded by smart women on that stage with me, but that wasn’t the focus of why we were there. I would end up leaving with this pit in my stomach knowing that I was so much more than what was being objectified on the stage. I didn’t like being forced to be all looks and little substance, and that’s how it felt for me at the time – being reduced to this specific archetype: the word ‘bimbo.’”

Predictably “me, me, me” in her manner, just as with her “me, me, me” speech in Manchester in September, here is a woman who’d do better to do just one thing. That thing? Learn the art of silence.

Twitter reacts to ‘Moaning Meg’ and brands her a total “bore”

What’s the truth about the stories that abound about the Duchess of Sussex?
- In November 2021, the duchess was forced to apologise to the Appeal Court in London for making a misleading statement in her privacy case against The Mail on Sunday’s publishers.
- Her very own father, Thomas, has called out her many untruths about him and others again, again and again.
- Of her claiming having got married the day before she actually did, Mr Markle stated: “Lying about the archbishop? How can you say: ‘We’ve been married three days before we got married’? Her lies are so obvious, I don’t know why she says them.”
- Her very own half-sister, Samantha, who is currently bringing a defamation case against her, has called her out as a liar on multiple occasions also. It has been proven that the duchess’s claim that she hasn’t seen her sibling in over 20 years was proven untrue when a photo of the pair 13 years ago emerged.
- Her very own half-brother, Thomas Jr., said of her: “I told Prince Harry, I think she’s going to ruin your life. She’s very shallow… She’s a phony, a bully, a jaded, shallow, conceited woman.”
- The wife of Prince Harry has been called out on multiple occasions for spinning stories against other members of the royal family, most especially the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge.
- Staff who’ve worked for her have complained that she is a bully and investigations into this remain ongoing.
- The Duchess of Sussex is a known manipulator of the press and paparazzis and it has been claimed that she’ll “twist the truth” to get any headline she wants.
- Questions remain as to how many times she’s actually been married in total. Some say twice, some say thrice.
- Did the ‘Montecito Meddler’ meet Prince Andrew or Prince Harry first? Rumours abound that she could have spent time and holidayed with the former as long ago as 2001 and that her claim to have no prior knowledge of the royal family until 2016 is just utter baloney.
- “Would you trust this woman with a bargepole?” is something often asked of this money motivated minx.
Questions about the alleged former ‘yacht girl’ Duchess of Sussex’s involvement with Soho House director Markus Anderson have also been doing the rounds in recent days. The pair’s involvement with the pugnacious PR peddler Omid Scobie have also again surfaced.

"She's clearly acting out of bad intent."

Tucker Carlson says he "watched with shock" when Piers Morgan lost his job after calling out "ridiculous narcissist" Meghan Markle.@TuckerCarlson | @piersmorgan | @TalkTV | #PMU pic.twitter.com/px5BTEygNA
— Piers Morgan Uncensored (@PiersUncensored) October 18, 2022

Meghan Markle's Deal or No Deal costar fires back at her claims

Good for Claudia calling out Fake’s BS https://t.co/Pvkw9MgDSu via @Femail
— HarrysGreySuit (@hrrysgreysuit) October 19, 2022
October 19, 2022
With Friends Like These… Prince Andrew Reacts To Ghislaine Maxwell Interviews

As prized pillock Prince Andrew reacts to mucky madam Ghislaine Maxwell’s interviews, we suggest that he’s a case of “with friends like these, who needs enemies”

Non-sweating, Pizza Express loving prized pillock Prince Andrew isn’t very good at choosing mates. He’s got “I’d take a bullet for Putin” coffin dodger Bernie Ecclestone – a deranged dwarf-like dweeb currently on trial for fraud – and aside from a fair few despots, he happily used to hang around with the croaked paedophile Jeffrey Epstein – even after his 2008 conviction.

Now, after another of his previously close mates, the convicted sex trafficking nonce and daughter of a pension pot plunderer Ghislaine Maxwell, gave a pair of “jaw-dropping” interviews to a PR peddler for Hillary Clinton named Daphne Barak, unnamed “close friends” of the royal have declared: “[He] needs Ghislaine’s support like a hole in the head.”

Whilst Maxwell claimed to “care for… dear friend [the Duke of York],” the chirpy, chatty “friend” of the late Queen’s second son responded describing the criminal’s remarks as “[having] not been very helpful.” Clearly, said individual is someone who likes understatements when it comes to observing public relations disaster areas.

“With friends like these, who needs enemies” comes to mind in the wake of Maxwell’s interviews with Barak for The Sun on Sunday and The Mail on Sunday. Here is a woman who has used her latest PR peddler to send out a message and it is a message that is clear.

The deviant daughter of a man most definitely a spy wants to tell the world something and that something is this: Ponzi schemer Jeffrey Epstein’s former lover is alerting the royal and the likes of Bill Clinton and Donald Trump that she expects them to help her out of her hell hole. It is a hell hole where she actually deserves to rot for the rest of her genuinely rotten existence.

Pictured top – The Duke of York and his live-in ex-wife Sarah, Duchess of York snapped in a Range Rover yesterday looking, as the ‘MailOnline’ was quick to point out, “ashen faced” and “incredibly serious.”

With friends like these… The guffawing goon that is the Duke of York was happy to take the “benefits” of his friendship with someone who bunged him cash and girls, Jeffrey Epstein, when it suited him. He was happy to take the “benefits” of his friendship with Ghislaine Maxwell, someone he allegedly even had a relationship with, when it suited him. He must now face the music and possibly also prepare to be dragged before the authorities if he ever dares to darken the doors of the United States of America ever again. Shame on him.

With friends like these… In February 2020, ‘The Steeple Times’ reported on croaked paedophile Jeffrey Epstein’s chum (and his wife Sarah, Duchess of York’s financial sponsor) Prince Andrew having Bernie Ecclestone over to Royal Lodge, Windsor to celebrate his birthday. Whether this man “with qualities that would make Leona Helmsley look generous” brought Sloppy Giuseppes from Pizza Express (Woking branch) for the bash remains still unknown.

With friends like these… Another chum of ‘Air Miles Andy’ is the billionaire despot leader of Azerbaijan President Ilham Aliyev. This authoritarian dictator is known for a regime that presides over elections that are not free and fair, where political power is concentrated in the hands of his family, where corruption is rampant and human rights violations are beyond severe. The Aliyev’s have over £400 million of property in the United Kingdom alone and the Duke of York has most definitely been beyond helpful to them.

With friends like these… Sarah, Duchess of York, equally, has a lot to fear from Ghislaine Maxwell. She happily took wonga from Ponzi schemer Jeffrey Epstein in loans and gifts and has never declared whether or not she ever repaid such prior to the paedophile’s death in 2019. Shame on her.

October 17, 2022
Boo-Hoo Schofe – Brazen Blubber Phillip Schofield Booed At National TV Awards

Boo-hoo for cretinous crybaby queue jumper Phillip Schofield as the flogger of “plughole plonk” unsurprisingly gets booed at the National Television Awards

Rightly called out as a disgrace in September alongside his equally tedious This Morning co-host Holly Willoughby, smugger-than-smug flogger of “fit only for pouring down the plughole boxed wine” Phillip Schofield unsurprisingly got booed at the National Television Awards last night. They were at the OVO Arena in Wembley, London to accept the 2022 Best Daytime Award and surrounded by an audience of their peers.

Known best until he and Willoughby jumped the queues to pay respects to the late Queen as she lay in state in Westminster for laughable, lowbrow television, the “widespread backlash” against this overpaid pair of prattlers caused “concerns for the pair’s mental health” if you’d believe the MailOnline’s Brittany Chain and Sean O’Grady. If, however, you take the view of the majority of the populous into consideration instead, the public would simply rather these two tedious twerps were just taken off our telly boxes for once and for all.

Whilst Schofield and Willoughby’s bosses defended “queuegate” and expressed “serious concerns over their well-being,” it was made clear again last night that even those in their industry have also had quite enough of the audacious antics of this awful duo.

In response to the “outrageous scandal,” a Change.org petition started by a woman named Laura Harrison argued:

“Holly Willoughby and Phillip Schofield, two hosts of one of the most damaging to mental health day time TV shows This Morning, were able to push past those thousands and get immediate access [those waiting to pay their respects to the late Queen].”

“I’d like to see This Morning axed for good as I do believe it causes more harm than good, without people noticing. For example, like turning cost of living anxiety into a game show. At the least though, these presenters Holly and Phillip should finally be removed from our TV screens. They’ve monopolised way too long.”

“If you agree, please sign. If enough people sign we can show ITV that the public do matter. And these two don’t deserve our time.”

As of this morning at 11.30am, the total number of signatures to the petition had reached 79,000. It is time ITV paid attention to the public and axed not only This Morning’s Phillip Schofield and Holly Willoughby but also ridded their channel of the equally repugnant harpy hosts of the sexually salacious Loose Women.

Cretinous crybaby Schofield is an attention seeking berk who well and truly should be silenced for once and for all.

Instead of skipping queues and upsetting the nation in the process, the all-round-angry man and ‘This Morning’ host and ex-sidekick of Gordon the Gopher should quit his ITV job and focus on improving his deservedly slammed boxed wines. He thought his red “perfect with olives” whilst the public thought it “better poured down the plughole.”

Telly box legend Christine Hamilton showed her outrage for Phillip Schofield on 16th September when she highlighted how footballer David Beckham queued with the public whilst the ‘This Morning’ host “queue jumped.” She highlighted the lack of “special treatment” for the ex-England footballer with the ITV presenter’s arrogance and concluded: “Has he endured the privations of the queue? Has he hell. What in God’s name is he doing? Who the hell does he think he is?”

Phillip Schofield was photographed Matthew McGreevy on a number of occasions. In 2020, various publications reported about the links between the two during the latter’s youth.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cGuoqjTg1O8&feature=emb_imp_woyt

The temper tantrum prone television presenter with his ‘friend’ Mr McGreevy at a later date when they worked together. Whether they are still in contact or friends still even is unknown.

Please sign our petition to get the equally repugnant ‘Loose Women’ axed from ITV. Started in 2018, it has yet to gain the traction of the ‘Axe Phillip Schofield and Holly Willoughby from TV’ on Change.org, but it deserves to now be revived. In it, at the time of launching it, Matthew Steeples stated: “ITV1’s ‘Loose Women’ celebrates all that is toxic about womankind. Their latest debacle, involving Coleen Nolan making Kim Woodburn cry on air, is indicative of how low this show stoops. On another occasion Judy Finnigan suggested the convicted rapist Ched Evans deserved to be allowed to return to playing football. There have been plenty of other examples involving Katie Price, Gloria Hunniford and Linda Robson that simply provide illustration of how tawdry this programme – screened when mothers are surely watching with young children – is. ITV – Do the decent thing. Axe ‘Loose Women.’”

October 14, 2022
Jeremy Corbyn Joins The Sussex Squad
As the ‘Sussex Squad’ yet again get rightly called out on Twitter, shameless socialist Jeremy Corbyn bizarrely leaps to the multi-millionaire’s defence; with an unlikely friend like him, who needs enemies?

This morning, as is so often the case, the ‘Sussex Squad’ and their mistress-in-chief the Duchess of Sussex trended on Twitter. There is nothing surprising about that – given the public’s clear dislike for the meddling menace formerly known as Meghan Markle – but now, it seems, the wicked wench has gone and got herself an unlikely super-fan: Labour’s worst ever leader, Jeremy Corbyn.

Speaking to Aaron Bastani, the co-founder of the left-wing media organisation Novara Media, on Tuesday ‘Jezza’ remarked:

“I had very nice chats with Harry and Meghan… Very interesting, interesting. Harry’s life, Harry’s life has always been totally in the public eye, but a former serving officer and so on in the armed forces and Meghan, I think, is very interesting, a very clear-thinking woman, I’ve got a lot of time for her.”

“[She’s not been treated so badly] in the last few days, in the last few days it’s been alright for the last few days. They’ve been quite warm towards her, but she, erm, before that, I think the treatment of her has been appalling.”

“It’s led by the media wanting to, erm, I don’t know why, they just wanted to build her up into a negative figure, which she’s not. She is an intelligent, thoughtful woman.”

“I absolutely think there’s a racial component to it, absolutely, yeah. I do.”

“I mean, erm, who? Why? That’s speculation, but you know, she is a very able person and she’s got a great contribution to make and lots of radical ideas. She’s a good speaker, good, good.”

“I think that’s what the stress is [a career outside her marriage]… Well, the Duke of Edinburgh always called it ‘The Firm’ because they should be, click, like that. [She wasn’t up that]… NOPE! That’s what I understand, yeah.”

“Like that, where there’s any family stress, it’s very difficult to cope with. Look at it from the human point of view.”

Who’d have thought a far-left socialist and a woman living in a £14 million mansion in Montecito would end up besties? They say stranger things happen, but in this curious case they most certainly already have.

https://twitter.com/royal_suitor/status/1575251792354738177

Who’d have thought a leftie like Jeremy Corbyn would want to become a mouthpiece for the meddling menace that is the woman formerly known as Meghan Markle? Perhaps this hypocritical toerag is angling for a holiday at her Montecito mansion?

What’s the truth about the stories that abound about the Duchess of Sussex?
- In November 2021, the duchess was forced to apologise to the Appeal Court in London for making a misleading statement in her privacy case against The Mail on Sunday’s publishers.
- Her very own father, Thomas, has called out her many untruths about him and others again, again and again.
- Of her claiming having got married the day before she actually did, Mr Markle stated: “Lying about the archbishop? How can you say: ‘We’ve been married three days before we got married’? Her lies are so obvious, I don’t know why she says them.”
- Her very own half-sister, Samantha, who is currently bringing a defamation case against her, has called her out as a liar on multiple occasions also. It has been proven that the duchess’s claim that she hasn’t seen her sibling in over 20 years was proven untrue when a photo of the pair 13 years ago emerged.
- Her very own half-brother, Thomas Jr., said of her: “I told Prince Harry, I think she’s going to ruin your life. She’s very shallow… She’s a phony, a bully, a jaded, shallow, conceited woman.”
- The wife of Prince Harry has been called out on multiple occasions for spinning stories against other members of the royal family, most especially the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge.
- Staff who’ve worked for her have complained that she is a bully and investigations into this remain ongoing.
- The Duchess of Sussex is a known manipulator of the press and paparazzis and it has been claimed that she’ll “twist the truth” to get any headline she wants.
- Questions remain as to how many times she’s actually been married in total. Some say twice, some say thrice.
- Questions remain also as to what engagement the duchess has had with meddlers such as Christopher Bouzy, Omid Scobie and her other ‘Sussex Squaddies’ and also as to what her deals with the likes of Netflix and Spotify involve her ‘spilling.’
- Did the ‘Montecito Meddler’ meet Prince Andrew or Prince Harry first? Rumours abound that she could have spent time and holidayed with the former as long ago as 2001 and that her claim to have no prior knowledge of the royal family until 2016 is just utter baloney.
- “Would you trust this woman with a bargepole?” is something often asked of this money motivated minx.
Sussex Squad trends on Twitter (again)…
September 29, 2022
More Mess For Murky Mucky Maxwell – Saga Never Ends
The Maxwell mess continues… Ghislaine Maxwell trial commentator for CNN Page Peter drowns in Georgia as Jeffrey Epstein whistleblower Maria Farmer curiously claims she was planning to move in with his Ponzi scheming “mentor” Steven Hoffenberg before his death; separately Maxwell gets sued by another of her former lawyers.

On Sunday, 55-year-old constitutional law attorney Page Peter – whose commentary for CNN during Ghislaine Maxwell’s trial was noted – became the latest with a link to the mucky madam and her case to meet an unfortunate end when he tragically drowned off the coast of Georgia.

Whilst Mr Peter was pronounced dead at the scene, his son, who had been swimming alongside him, fortunately was rescued and meanwhile in other news on Tuesday, The Sun’s Chris White “exclusively” revealed that Jeffrey Epstein’s “mentor” Steven Hoffenberg was “due to move in with the late paedophile’s first whistleblower… [and] victim” Maria Farmer “just before he died.”

Grifting conman Hoffenberg, who left behind 200,000 victims of his Ponzi scheme when his decomposing body was found in August, was ludicrously lauded by Farmer as being “like an angel to all the survivors.” Going further of the born-again Christian criminal, the 52-year-old ex-receptionist added:

“I was his family. He was my family. I’ve never had a real father, Hoffenberg was like a father to me. He was loving and kind, and he was full of remorse about trusting Epstein.”

“He spent all of his days trying to make up for what he overlooked about Epstein.”

“He lived off social security, eating barely anything. He had £1,130 ($1,300, €1,301 or درهم4,774) a month to live on including rent. That’s why I wanted him to come here because he wouldn’t have to pay rent, so he would have a bit more money.”

“He would not let me give him anything, but I finally got him to agree because I had a place for him to live, we decorated the room for him.”

“We were writing a children’s book together. But then he got really, really sick – and that was a month before he died. He died at home alone.”

“I’m glad that he’s no longer suffering. But I can tell you this, people really missed out on a great man because I got to know him.”

“He was there for us all the time. He helped if I had any legal questions, and I didn’t want to bother my lawyers, I could call him and he had the answers, as he’d retrained as a lawyer in prison.”

“He was a sounding board for us. Hoffenberg felt culpable because he didn’t pick up on Epstein, just like I didn’t at first. You feel completely guilty.”

“He always said: ‘I just need to make up for everything that’s ever happened.’”

“He was the biggest supporter to all the survivors. He prayed for each of them every day.”

In another development, on Tuesday also, the Daily Beast’s Kate Briquelet shared that Kyle R. Waldner, a counsel in the U.S. Virgin Islands office of Quintairos, Prieto, Wood & Boyer, P.A. have followed Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C. – who are suing the ‘Bouncing Czech’s’ deviant daughter, her estranged husband Scott Borgerson and her brother Kevin Maxwell for £763,285 ($878,302, €879,247 or درهم3.2 million) in unpaid legal fees – and have announced they “would stop representing her unless payment was received.”

In a filing in late August, Kyle Waldner of the firm “indicated that he [had] informed Kevin Maxwell, and [Ghislaine] Maxwell herself in a letter to her in prison at FCI Tallahassee.”

Attorney and CNN commentator on the mucky madam Maxwell’s messy trial Page Peter tragically drowned last weekend.

The decomposing body of Steven Hoffenberg, the evil Ponzi schemer and “mentor” of Jeffrey Epstein, was found in a very messy house he shared in Derby, Connecticut on 23rd August.

Maria Farmer’s claim that she was planning on moving Steven Hoffenberg, the criminal associate and “mentor” of the man she went to the FBI to claim she abused by, Jeffrey Epstein, into her home prior to his death in August is beyond curious.

Scott Borgerson (pictured left with his new lover Kris McGlinn and right with his now estranged convicted criminal wife) is being chased for payment by Ghislaine Maxwell’s legal team. The likely costs involved are well above £1 million and the mess that the mucky madam got herself and her family into will ultimately have cost into the tens of millions.

63-year old Kevin Maxwell (pictured with his sibling Isabel) is also being pursued for his convicted criminal sister’s legal costs.

The ‘Curious’ Deaths Connected To Jeffrey Epstein And Ghislaine Maxwell That Continue To Stack Up…

People who’ve moved in the orbit of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell do have a habit of coming to ‘sticky ends’ – amongst them:
- Pension pot plundering tea leaf Robert Maxwell (death by ‘falling off the back of a boat’ in the Canary Islands, Spain on 5^th November 1991).
- Palm Beach based Ponzi schemer and paedophile Jeffrey Epstein (death by ‘suicide’ in prison in New York, USA on 10^th August 2019).
- Palm Beach based Ponzi scheming crook Bernard L. Madoff (death as a result of chronic kidney disease on 14^th April 2021 in Butner, North Carolina).
- Palm Beach based Marvin Weiner and his wife Sondra, the sister of Ponzi schemer Bernie Madoff (death by murder-suicide in Boynton Beach, USA on 17^th February 2022).
- Molester model agent and alleged paedophile Jean-Luc Brunel (death by ‘suicide’ in prison in Paris, France on 19^th February 2022).
- Convicted Ponzi scheming Donald Trump associate and self-publicist Steven J. Hoffenberg (death by causes yet unknown on date yet unknown in Derby, Connecticut, USA, decomposing body found on 23^rd August 2022).
- Attorney and trial lawyer Page Pate (death by drowning on the coast of Georgia on 11^th September 2022) – his commentary on Ghislaine Maxwell’s trial was noted.
September 15, 2022
Me, Me, Me Meghan Mocked – Meghan Markle’s Farcical Manchester Speech Derided
As the dopey Duchess of Sussex is derided for her “me, me, me” speech in Manchester, her pugnacious PR peddler Omid Scobie continues his cretinous campaign against her husband’s family

Today, as the new Prime Minister Liz Truss heads to Balmoral to see the Queen, it remains unknown as to whether her grandson Prince Harry and his wife – currently in Europe bigging themselves up in spite of the public clearly not wanting them present – will bother to do the same and pay a visit also.

In Düsseldorf today for the Invictus Games but said to be have “free time” tomorrow before being expected at the WellChild Awards in London on Thursday, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex were deservedly slammed by Gyles Brandreth yesterday on ITV’s This Morning programme.

Speaking of the dastardly duo, the much-loved veteran broadcaster and author declared: “The number of people being as sympathetic to them [the Sussexes] as they were initially does seem to be sort of thinning out a little bit… Once you make yourself the story, then you yourself become the story. What should be the story is the good works that you are doing… but, in fact, what we’re talking about is the family rift.”

Unsurprisingly, elsewhere the MailOnline’s Mark Duell referenced an intervention by Omid Scobie – who he termed “Meghan and Harry’s friend and trusted media partner” – in which the feckless Finding Freedom ‘author’ laughably claimed: “This is very much about the work [that the couple] wanted to do ever since they stepped back.” The leading “Sussex Squaddie” and all-round troll did, however, fail to mention what role paymasters’ Netflix and Spotify would play in the charade and also neglected to justify his continuing campaign against other members of Prince Harry’s family.

Turning to the speech to 2,000 young people in Manchester yesterday by the Duchess of Sussex, The Sun’s Sarah Grealish reported on a “Meg-A Snub” and shared news of the former Suits actress and her drippy husband being “booed and branded ‘fake royals’ by [the] crowd on [their] ‘me, me, me’ mini-tour.” The duchess referenced herself an astonishing 54 times during her 7-minute “nonsensical” tirade before the assembled gathering at the One Young World youth gala.

Grealish added that the couple were faced with “anti-royal placards” and “one woman accused Meghan of being a ‘liar and a hypocrite’ and of launching an ‘attack’ on the royal family.” Another, “Janet from Manchester” is said to have added: “She’s a fake humanitarian and a fake feminist. She’s a social climber… She thought she could be a celebrity in the royal family and she’s the most toxic, divisive woman I’ve ever heard of in my life.”

Pictured top – Plastic-not-anything-but-fantastic PR peddler not-a-journalist Omid Scobie (left) and his delusional puppet mistress, the Duchess of Sussex (right) yesterday in the north of England.

The ‘Montecito Meddler’ turned up looking like a scarlet woman to give her speech yesterday. It was met with derision given it was just about herself rather than inspiring to the young people who’d paid upto £1,000 to be present.

On Twitter, Jimmy Failla of ‘Fox Across America’ called out the Duchess of Sussex and remarked of her: “It takes a special kind of stupid to claim women are being held back on the SAME DAY they name a Female Prime Minister” in the United Kingdom.

Meanwhile this morning, after the ‘Daily Mail’s’ Richard Eden referenced “charity clearly [starting] at home for mother and daughter” behind the One Young World charity – after ‘The Sun’ reported that Kate Robertson and her daughter Ella Robertson McKay took home £634,494 in pay between them last year in spite of the pandemic, ‘The Steeple Times’s’ editor Matthew Steeples expressed surprise that “Chanel-clad” Baroness Meyer – who Eden had previously called out for her “charitable” antics” – had not got in on the act.

The second son of Prince Charles and his late former wife Diana, Princess of Wales were told they were “fake royals” and to “f**k off” by one placard waving protestor. Another added: “[‘MeGain’] has used every card she can – racism, mental health, feminism. She’s not a feminist, she’s just a hypocrite.”

As the duo arrived at the Bridgewater Hall, they were booed and jeered from behind barriers by an angry mob. Their demand for a “ring of steel” security curtain to shield them from such did nothing except draw further attention to how much the British public truly dislike their audacious antics.

The couple’s popularity has plunged further and further into the quagmire in recent months. Nobody is surprised about that and they’re most certainly up there with non-sweating friend of child abusing sex traffickers Prince Andrew in the very, very disliked stakes.

What’s the truth about the stories that abound about the Duchess of Sussex?
- In November 2021, the duchess was forced to apologise to the Appeal Court in London for making a misleading statement in her privacy case against The Mail on Sunday’s publishers.
- Her very own father, Thomas, has called out her many untruths about him and others again, again and again.
- Of her claiming having got married the day before she actually did, Mr Markle stated: “Lying about the archbishop? How can you say: ‘We’ve been married three days before we got married’? Her lies are so obvious, I don’t know why she says them.”
- Her very own half-sister, Samantha, who is currently bringing a defamation case against her, has called her out as a liar on multiple occasions also. It has been proven that the duchess’s claim that she hasn’t seen her sibling in over 20 years was proven untrue when a photo of the pair 13 years ago emerged.
- Her very own half-brother, Thomas Jr., said of her: “I told Prince Harry, I think she’s going to ruin your life. She’s very shallow… She’s a phony, a bully, a jaded, shallow, conceited woman.”
- The wife of Prince Harry has been called out on multiple occasions for spinning stories against other members of the royal family, most especially the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge.
- Staff who’ve worked for her have complained that she is a bully and investigations into this remain ongoing.
- The Duchess of Sussex is a known manipulator of the press and paparazzis and it has been claimed that she’ll “twist the truth” to get any headline she wants.
- Questions remain as to how many times she’s actually been married in total. Some say twice, some say thrice.
- Did the ‘Montecito Meddler’ meet Prince Andrew or Prince Harry first? Rumours abound that she could have spent time and holidayed with the former as long ago as 2001 and that her claim to have no prior knowledge of the royal family until 2016 is just utter baloney.
- “Would you trust this woman with a bargepole?” is something often asked of this money motivated minx.
September 6, 2022