The Steeple Times

Category: Deranged Divas

  • Tommy’s Trolls v Sussex Squaddies – Vile Abusive Troll Supporters of Ghislaine Maxwell, Tommy Robinson and Duchess of Sussex

    Tommy’s Trolls v Sussex Squaddies – Vile Abusive Troll Supporters of Ghislaine Maxwell, Tommy Robinson and Duchess of Sussex

    Whose troll is worse? The bigots who support racist Tommy Robinson, the apologists for mucky madam Ghislaine Maxwell or Meghan Markle’s ‘Sussex Squaddies’?

    Whilst Ghislaine Maxwell has pathetic PR peddling pillocks like Brian Basham and Jay Beecher still batting for her on social media in spite of the evidence pointing towards that they – just like the lawyers currently suing her for £754,000 ($878,000, €877,000 or درهم2.2 million) over their unpaid bills – won’t get a dime for their time, the likes of the Tommy Robinson and the Duchess of Sussex continue to follow her lead and encourage their deranged troll followers to harass anyone who dares call their appalling antics out.

     

    Yesterday, when rabid racist Robinson was trending on Twitter over his hate-stoking towards Pakistani men, I dared to suggest that it rather suited his narrative of profiteering from the somewhat beyond stupid supporters who’ve funded his lifestyle for long now, I was met with comments that included suggestions that I was a “grooming gang apologist” and indeed a “nonce” myself.

     

    Clearly endgendered with the intent of encouraging hate crimes against myself and others who agreed with my sentiments, these keyboard warriors are the kind of people that wouldn’t say boo to a goose in a pub, but assume that from behind their nasty net curtains they can make threats and issue slurs to their hearts’ contents.

     

    In the hours that followed, after calling out one particularly obnoxious woman believed to be called Lucy Terina (whose mangled missives are shared below along with those of ‘Sussex Squaddie’ leader Christopher Bouzy), Robinson’s ranters bombarded me with hate and suggested all kinds of nonsense. In doing so, however, all they did was illustrate to anyone rational that Twitter is simply an echo room where those that shout loudest simply make the biggest berks of themselves.

     

    The grubby groper Ghislaine Maxwell and the mendacious minx that is the Duchess of Sussex should take note – employing trolls simply puts you in the same league as the racist Tommy Robinson. Now please girls, pipe down and play nicely.

     

    Pictured top (left to right) – A covered in milkshake Tommy Robinson, a contemplative Ghislaine Maxwell and a seriously smug Duchess of Sussex.

     

    Fake-Followers
    Plastic-anything-but-fantastic Omid Scobie, like the equally off-his-merry-rocker chump Christopher Bouzy, peddles poison and lies for the Duchess of Sussex. He is not a journalist, but in fact someone who encourages gross mistruths about other members of the royal family to be spread. Whilst the rest of the world condemned the wicked wench formerly known as Meghan Markle for her ludicrous ‘Archetypes’ podcast, in his ‘Yahoo!Life’ column Scobie raged: “Once silenced by the establishment, it’s clear that Meghan finally has her voice back. A voice that will be very familiar to those who followed her before Harry. This time, however, she’s brought an entire movement alongside it.” No doubt his huge number of “fake” followers adored that gibberish.

    Example Troll – @terinalucy1972 (Presumably actually named Lucy Terina)

    The not-so-lovely London based Lucy Terina unsurprisingly backs Brexit and as well as hash-tagging that also adds: #Borisismasterofbrexit. That’s she a big fan of Tommy Robinson leads to only one conclusion about this brazen bigot and that is: “How terribly predictable.”

    Example Troll – @cbouzy (Christopher Bouzy, BotSentinel)

    ‘Blue ticked’ by Twitter in spite of being nothing but a nasty piece of toerag, Christopher Bouzy targets anyone who dares speak out against those he’d love to be more closely involved with – namely the Duchess of Sussex and Amber Heard. He has a past clearly chequered and peppered with questionable episodes. It’s no surprise that one of Ghislaine Maxwell’s favoured mouthpieces, Jay Beecher, associates with him.

  • Moron of the Moment 2022 – Maniac PR Peddler Omid Scobie

    Moron of the Moment 2022 – Maniac PR Peddler Omid Scobie

    In yet again making it all about his anything but sorry self and tittle-tattling about his delusional worries about his personal security, the PR peddler for the Duchess of Sussex that is the maniac Omid Scobie yet again shows himself as nothing but a prized pillock and prat

    Some people make it their life’s work to laud those that do good whilst others make it their life’s work to bring down those that behave improperly. In many ways both sets of people – and some fall into both categories variously – are to be celebrated, but then there are those that simply have to connect anything to their not at all relevant in any way to anything narrative’s to themselves.

     

    Unsurprisingly yet again showing himself as the ultimate example of such yesterday, the rotten-to-his-core PR peddler for the Duchess of Sussex that is the maniac Omid Scobie turned a story about who ought to pay for royal security into a fantasy about his worries about his own personal security.

     

    In a rabid rant for Yahoo! News, the – just like the deranged duchess he so toadily cosies up to – the one-time mate of the glamour model Jodie Marsh whinged and whined and then whimpered:

     

    “I witness a lot myself, too. Thanks to a never-ending stream of false tabloid tales calling me the couple’s ‘close friend’ or ‘spokesman,’ I regularly receive an extension of their online threats. The messages range from extreme racism to disturbingly violent scenes involving the likes of dismemberment, car accidents and rape. They always get forwarded to the police.”

     

    Deservedly called out on many an occasion by amongst others The Steeple Times favourite Sadie Quinlan (AKA ‘Yankee Wally’), the leading apologist for the drippy Duke and Duchess of Sussex revealed earlier this month that he’d be dribbling out more drivel on behalf of the delusional duo in a new book to be published by Harper Collins.

     

    Clearly aimed at countering the deserved hatchet job done by Tom Bower’s Revenge: Meghan, Harry and the War between the Windsors, this as yet untitled tittle-tattling trash, according to its avaricious author, will focus on “a new chapter of the royal story and feature unique insight, deep access and exclusive revelations… [that will] have the world talking.”

     

    Desperate to scavenge anything he can from the car wreck that is the frankly increasingly boring ‘story’ of the modern day ‘Mr and Mrs Wallis Simpson,’ Scobie should (but of course won’t) finally realise one thing: The world’s laughing at this ludicrous arse-licker and not with him and his birdbrained bosses. It’s time all three of them did something else: It’s high time the lot of them bloody well bogged off.

     

    Prince Harry security
    “The safety of others should never be up for debate” pontificated the ‘Finding Freedom’ author whilst sharing his latest bag of bilge. He pompously ended: “Reinstate Harry’s security at his own expense – before it’s too late.” Clearly a crackpot crazy conspiracy theorist, what does this berk expect to happen to the couple he has made a career out of arselicking? A car crash? Murder at the Montecito mansion Manson style? Them eaten alive by a lion?
    In August 2020, the ‘Daily Mail’ shared that plastic-not-fantastic Omid previously worked at gossip magazine ‘Heat’ and partied with the ‘glamour model’ Jodie Marsh. They mentioned how somebody had “airbrushed” Meghan Markle’s “entry on the online encyclopedia Wikipedia… to include more flattering details days before her romance with Prince Harry became public” and illustrated the ‘Finding Freedom’ author’s “drastic transformation” in two very different photographs. Maniac Scobie is someone who most definitely would like his past forgotten, but here again we remind him that he’s actually just a two-faced twerp.
    Fake Followers
    An analysis of maniac Omid Scobie’s Twitter feed clearly shows that a large proportion of his followers are a bit like himself: FAKE.
    Watching
    Illustrating his clearly delusional desperation for attention, the ‘Finding Freedom’ author recently took to Twitter to declare: “Know that if I’m quiet at the moment, it’s because I’m busy writing – (and it feels so nice to be able to finally admit that!)… I’m always watching though.” Who on earth does this blabbering bozo think he is? MI5?
    Richard Eden
    On 4th August, the day the wicked wench formerly known as Meghan Markle turned maybe 41 or maybe 45, the both witty and wise ‘Daily Mail’ diarist Richard Eden tweeted: “Happy birthday to the Duchess of Sussex, who’s 41 today, or as Omid Scobie would put it, 31. #MeghanMarkle.”

    Can anyone solve a problem like ‘MeGain’?

    • In November 2021, the duchess was forced to apologise to the Appeal Court in London for making a misleading statement in her privacy case against The Mail on Sunday’s publishers.
    • Her very own father, Thomas, has called out her many untruths about him and others again, again and again.
    • Of her claiming having got married the day before she actually did, Mr Markle stated: “Lying about the archbishop? How can you say: ‘We’ve been married three days before we got married’? Her lies are so obvious, I don’t know why she says them.”
    • Her very own half-sister, Samantha, who is currently bringing a defamation case against her, has called her out as a liar on multiple occasions also. It has been proven that the duchess’s claim that she hasn’t seen her sibling in over 20 years was proven untrue when a photo of the pair 13 years ago emerged.
    • Her very own half-brother, Thomas Jr., said of her: “I told Prince Harry, I think she’s going to ruin your life. She’s very shallow… She’s a phony, a bully, a jaded, shallow, conceited woman.”
    • The former Meghan Markle has been called out on multiple occasions for spinning stories against other members of the royal family, most especially the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge.
    • Staff who’ve worked for her have complained that she is a bully and investigations into this remain ongoing.
    • The Duchess of Sussex is a known manipulator of the press and paparazzis and it has been claimed that she’ll “twist the truth” to get any headline she wants.
    • Questions remain as to how many times she’s actually been married in total. Some say twice, some say thrice. Any answer to such allegations, ‘MeGain’?
    • Who did this wicked wench meet first? Prince Andrew or Prince Harry?
    • Was the Duchess of Sussex ever associated in any way with Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell in the 2000s and 2010s?
    • What exactly defines the relationship between the Duchess of Sussex and Omid Scobie and Markus Anderson? Is it social, financial or is there something more to it?
    • “Would you trust this woman with a bargepole?” is something often asked of this money motivated minx.

     

  • The Age of ‘MeGain’ – Is The Duchess of Sussex Really 41 Today?

    The Age of ‘MeGain’ – Is The Duchess of Sussex Really 41 Today?

    As the Duchess of Sussex supposedly turns 41, pundits question whether this is yet another example of her “convenient truths” and suggest she could actually be now aged 45

    Today marks, if you believe her nonsensical narrative, the 41st birthday of the Duchess of Sussex. Today, if you don’t believe her narrative and side with her estranged sister Samantha, it is actually the wicked woman formerly known as Meghan Markle’s 45th birthday.

     

    Described as “having a very conflicted relationship with the truth” on many matters on Quora and accused again this week by crusading author Kirby Sommers of having met Prince Andrew and his since croaked paedophile mates Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell prior to hooking up with Prince Harry, here is a woman whose age is estimated as high as 46 – five years older than she herself claims.

     

    Accused also of having “fabricated past stories to bolster her career as an actress,” the now wife of Prince Harry’s claimed, aged 13 at the time, that she kissed a boy also aged 13 when they both attended a summer camp in Santa Monica. Given, that ‘boy,’ “honour winning entertainer and author” Joshua Silverstein, is listed as having been born in 1977, that would make the pair of them 45 and most certainly not 41.

     

    Today, as some wish her a happy birthday and others wish she’d just disappear forever into obscurity, it is time for some answers. Come on alleged ‘yacht girl’ Meghan, it’s time for the truth; how old, actually, are you?

     

    Today on Twitter, Matthew Steeples asked: “Do you believe the woman formerly known as Meghan Markle is turning 41 today or do you believe her estranged sisters and others who suggest she might actually be turning 45?” The overwhelming response thus far suggests that the Twitterati believe the Duchess of Sussex to be telling porky pies about her real age.
    Samantha Markle and sister Meghan
    Samantha Markle was supposedly born on Tuesday 24th November 1964, which makes her 57 years, 8 months old. Her sister, she has claimed in legal documents is 13 years older than her, which would make her 45 years old and born in 1977 and not 41 and born in 1981 as she has claimed.
    Centre of attention 1
    At a time when the Queen has lost her husband and suffered the indignity of the embarrassment caused by her second son ‘Randy Andy’s’ antics with the likes of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, the attention seeking ways of Prince Charles’s second son and his trashbag American wife are not exactly helpful.
    Speculation
    Quora users have long speculated about and questioned the date of birth of the daughter of Thomas Markle and Dora Ragland. They, frankly, simply do not believe her suggestion of having been born on the 4th August 1981.
    Centre of attention 2
    Whatever the situation and whomever she is with, here is anything but camera shy woman who has to make utterly everything about herself.

    Can anyone solve a problem like ‘MeGain’?

    • What year was Meghan Markle actually born in? Is she 41 and born in 1981 or is she 45 and born in 1977 as has variously been claimed?
    • In November 2021, the duchess was forced to apologise to the Appeal Court in London for making a misleading statement in her privacy case against The Mail on Sunday’s publishers.
    • Her very own father, Thomas, has called out her many untruths about him and others again, again and again.
    • Of her claiming having got married the day before she actually did, Mr Markle stated: “Lying about the archbishop? How can you say: ‘We’ve been married three days before we got married’? Her lies are so obvious, I don’t know why she says them.”
    • Her very own half-sister, Samantha, who is currently bringing a defamation case against her, has called her out as a liar on multiple occasions also. It has been proven that the duchess’s claim that she hasn’t seen her sibling in over 20 years was proven untrue when a photo of the pair 13 years ago emerged.
    • Her very own half-brother, Thomas Jr., said of her: “I told Prince Harry, I think she’s going to ruin your life. She’s very shallow… She’s a phony, a bully, a jaded, shallow, conceited woman.”
    • The former Meghan Markle has been called out on multiple occasions for spinning stories against other members of the royal family, most especially the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge.
    • Staff who’ve worked for her have complained that she is a bully and investigations into this remain ongoing.
    • The Duchess of Sussex is a known manipulator of the press and paparazzis and it has been claimed that she’ll “twist the truth” to get any headline she wants.
    • Questions remain as to how many times she’s actually been married in total. Some say twice, some say thrice.
    • “Would you trust this woman with a bargepole?” is something often asked of this money motivated minx.
    National Enquirer
    Speculation about the former actress having had “hook-ups” with Matt Lauer have been doing the rounds. The former NBC news personality had his contract terminated with NBC in November 2017 after it was revealed he’d been into all sorts of sexual inappropriate behaviour in the workplace.
    Globe
    “Humiliated” Prince Harry’s wife has been accused also of being his “puppet master” and “destroying” him. His friends are said to have “blasted” her for taking him away from them and isolating him in their Montecito mansion.
    Tanya Gold on Meghan Markle
    In 2019, tedious twerp and ‘Unherd’ contributor Tanya Gold got the Duchess of Sussex completely wrong when she wrote in the ‘New York Times’: “Why does Meghan have the press in such paroxysms? Well, she is an interloper: divorced, American, biracial and, apparently, progressive. And she dares not only to inhabit the role of duchess but also to make it her own. Still, her critics – energized by their racism, misogyny and snobbery – can relax. She is not a revolutionary socialist, nor a convincing human rights activist who destroy everything they love. She will not bring down the royal family. In 2019, she is precisely what it needs.” Oxford educated (but Oxford hating), former alcoholic Tanya clearly ought to stick to other topics – she’s best known, after all, for also bigging-up the late paedophile Jimmy Savile as a “national treasure” and “enabling Savilisation.”
  • Was Mucky Minx Meghan Markle A ‘Yacht Girl’ For ‘Randy Andy’?

    Was Mucky Minx Meghan Markle A ‘Yacht Girl’ For ‘Randy Andy’?

    As author Kirby Sommers suggests that the then Meghan Markle likely spent time with Prince Andrew and Jeffrey Epstein before she met Prince Harry, we again highlight the mucky, murkiness and mendacious manner of this alleged “yacht girl”

    In January 2020, following a tip from a renowned journalist from a national newspaper, The Steeple Times asked: “Did the then Meghan Markle meet Prince Andrew before she met Prince Harry? Or did she meet the friend of the late paedophile Jeffrey Epstein first?”

     

    Now, just as the fallout from Tom Bower’s Revenge book continues to excite Twitter and her pugnacious PR peddler Omid Scobie announces that he’s writing a sequel to Finding Freedom, this very question has again resurfaced.

     

    Discussed in a 35:49-minute podcast shared on YouTube late last week, crusading author of Ghislaine Maxwell: An Unauthorized Biography Kirby Sommers examines the connections between the Duchess of Sussex, Prince Andrew, Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.

     

    Effectively suggesting Markle’s mate, Markus Anderson of Soho House, to be a ‘connector’ going back as far as 2001, Sommers argues the mainstream media “may have a photo of her” on a yacht in Phuket, Thailand “cavorting” with Prince Andrew at the behest of the mucky madam Maxwell and the since croaked paedophile Epstein.

     

    Going further, the author also provides evidence of Markle having been invited to the ‘Yacht Week 2016’ in Croatia by an individual named Adam Haun. Founded by William Wenkel in 2006 and described as “Sodom and Gommorah at sea” by GQ in 2015, it is unknown whether then actress attended the hedonistic “Tinder at sea” event that one participant, Sweet Home Alabama dating show ‘bachelor’ Tribble Reese lauded as “like the Bahamas on steroids!”

     

    Concluding on Twitter, Sommers observed: “[The Duchess of Sussex] is controlled by the same forces that controlled Jeffrey Epstein.”

     

    The Duke and Duchess of Sussex and the Duke of York andn their representatives, unsurprisingly, failed to respond to requests for comment.

     

    Matthew Steeples posted a poll on Twitter yesterday. It asked: “Who did the then Meghan Markle meet first and was she a “yacht girl”? Prince Andrew or Prince Harry? #PrinceAndrew #DukeOfYork #PrinceHarry #DukeOfSussex #Meghan #MeghanAndHarry #MeghanMarkle #MeghanMarkleisaLiar #royal #disgrace #lies #deception #outrage.” Indicating interest in the subject, it has attracted 500 votes in less than 24 hours with the majority of the belief that the former actress was indeed a “yacht girl” for Prince Andrew prior to meeting her now husband.
    Markus Anderson Prince Andrew
    A man believed to be Markus Anderson pictured on a yacht in Phuket, Thailand with Prince Andrew in 2001.

    Tweets by crusading author of ‘Ghislaine Maxwell: An Unauthorized Biography’ Kirkby Sommers about the connection between the Duchess of Sussex, the Duke of York and the late Jeffrey Epstein:

    KS Tweet 1
    KS Tweet 4
    KS Tweet 6
    KS Tweet 7

    Can anyone solve a problem like ‘MeGain’?

    • In November 2021, the duchess was forced to apologise to the Appeal Court in London for making a misleading statement in her privacy case against The Mail on Sunday’s publishers.
    • Her very own father, Thomas, has called out her many untruths about him and others again, again and again.
    • Of her claiming having got married the day before she actually did, Mr Markle stated: “Lying about the archbishop? How can you say: ‘We’ve been married three days before we got married’? Her lies are so obvious, I don’t know why she says them.”
    • Her very own half-sister, Samantha, who is currently bringing a defamation case against her, has called her out as a liar on multiple occasions also. It has been proven that the duchess’s claim that she hasn’t seen her sibling in over 20 years was proven untrue when a photo of the pair 13 years ago emerged.
    • Her very own half-brother, Thomas Jr., said of her: “I told Prince Harry, I think she’s going to ruin your life. She’s very shallow… She’s a phony, a bully, a jaded, shallow, conceited woman.”
    • The former Meghan Markle has been called out on multiple occasions for spinning stories against other members of the royal family, most especially the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge.
    • Staff who’ve worked for her have complained that she is a bully and investigations into this remain ongoing.
    • The Duchess of Sussex is a known manipulator of the press and paparazzis and it has been claimed that she’ll “twist the truth” to get any headline she wants.
    • Questions remain as to how many times she’s actually been married in total. Some say twice, some say thrice.
    • “Would you trust this woman with a bargepole?” is something often asked of this money motivated minx.
  • Organic Vegetable Maxwell – Rotten-To-Her-Core Ghislaine Maxwell Moves Jail

    Organic Vegetable Maxwell – Rotten-To-Her-Core Ghislaine Maxwell Moves Jail

    As mucky madam Ghislaine Maxwell is moved to a low security prison in Florida where prisoners will supposedly likely “hate” her, PR peddler Jay Beecher’s ‘The Maxwell Files’ website bizarrely starts promoting organic vegetables in Sussex and lists stories about this anything but wholesome criminal as “recipes”

    Conspiracy theorists would have you ludicrously believe that Ghislaine Maxwell (now more simply known as prisoner register number 02879-509) doesn’t exist. They cite the fact as supporting evidence of her disappearance that whilst Johnny Depp’s civil defamation case with Amber Heard was televised, the convicted mucky madam nonce’s criminal trial was not, but, as they often do, these crackpots get it all wrong.

     

    Whilst such individuals miss the very clear points of differences about the domain of each case and how media are allowed to cover or not cover such, they also ignore the simple matter that there were people present and that they did see a woman who was simply not suffering from malnutrition as her family had claimed. Cashmere clad Ghislaine Maxwell, our sources present tell us, was very much real, had a full head of hair and her weight had declined from 146 pounds on arrest by just 1.5 pounds to 144.5 pounds by the time of her trial.

     

    Rightly called out for her decidely dodgy deviancy – which ranged from inventing pseudonyms to telling porky pies about her multi-million dollar fortune – ‘The Bouncing Czech’s’ favourite child was last weekend transferred to the Tallahassee Federal Correctional Institution in Florida. She will now serve a sentence there that, if she learns to behave herself a bit better than she has thus far, will see her released on 17th July 2037.

     

    Joining other female inmates including Narcisa Véliz Novack – the notorious murderer of the former Fontainebleau Miami Beach hotel owner Bernice Novack (her ex-mother-in-law) and her son Ben Novack Jr. (her ex-husband) – Maxwell will now be forced to “clean toilets and wash dishes” for the “paltry sum” of “15 to 27 cents an hour” according to the DailyMail.com.

     

    Going further, the paper’s Daniel Bates added of the thus far unapologetic supposed ex-lover of non-sweating Prince Andrew:

     

    “[She] could become a target for others inmates unless she acts humbly and stops complaining about her life. But Maxwell has done the exact opposite so far and has griped relentlessly about her conditions.”

     

    “[She] will still still have a tough time adjusting and will be in with murderers and women who have committed serious assaults. The facility is run down, humid and some women will ‘hate her’ because of her celebrity… There will be women who have been abused themselves and will not like her at all because of her crimes.”

     

    Elsewhere yesterday, one of vegan Maxwell’s PR peddlers, Jay Beecher, took down the ‘Maxwell Files’ website where he has spread many falsehoods against the victims of this now convicted criminal sex trafficker. He replaced it with a “coming soon” missive, but by this morning an even stranger replacement had sprouted.

     

    The ‘Maxwell Files,’ now, has become a website that promotes the sale of “locally farmed organic vegetables” from a “12-acre farm in Sussex.” It still includes articles featuring the sexual abuser’s sibling Ian Maxwell bleating on about her “innocence,” but weirdly describes such as “our favourite recipes.” One thing, however, is for sure – the only grub Ghislaine Maxwell will deservedly be getting for the next twenty years is nothing but gruel. Off to the compost heap with this rotten apple!

     

    Pictured top (left to right) – Sordid “socialite” Ghislaine Maxwell living it up at Ascot racecourse in happier times in June 1991 prior to the death of her pension pot plundering papa; contributor to discredited ‘Politicalite’ publication – which disgracefully smeared the good name of respected journalist Peter Jukes – Jay Beecher and a selection of organic vegetables – as promoted by Beecher on his extremely toady arse-licking ‘Maxwell Files’ website.

     

    On Monday 25th July 2022, the ‘Maxwell Files’ site run by PR peddler Jay Beecher disappeared and was replaced with a “coming soon” message.
    By Tuesday 26th July, the website had been updated and had become a place listing the sale of organic vegetables and delivering “locally farmed organic vegetable boxes from [a] 12-acre farm in Sussex.” Ghislaine Maxwell’s connections to this operation are unknown, but it seems unlikely to see her toiling the soil ‘Darling Buds of May’ style any day soon (or until her anticipated release date in 2037 even).
    Maxwell Files Sussex 2
    The news section of the new ‘Maxwell Files’ website bizarrely suggested visitors “try with our vegetables” and “our favourite recipes.” These “recipes” included stories about the anything but wholesome mucky madam rather than actual stories about cooking with organic produce.
    Ethical and sustainable
    Ironically, the website – which has been amongst the main places apologists for the ex-wife to be of Scott Borgerson have posted content in support of her – had a section called: “Why you’ll love us.” It suggested the offering to be “ethical” amongst other things – something the mucky madam has most definitely been proven to anything but be.
    Previously, in January this year, a lady named Nicole Cornes attempted to suggest Jay Beecher previously worked for ‘The Steeple Times.’ Thankfully, when she realised that we would NEVER associate with this rotten piece of toerag, she very sensibly apologised.
    Jay Beecher Tweet
    Beecher likes to make himself out to be some kind of crusader who will never allow anyone to “silence [his] reporting.” He is instead simply laughable and a hollow individual who’ll jump any rotten bandwagon. How rotten the vegetables from his new operation in Sussex are remains to be seen.
    The Spectator Ian Maxwell
    Elsewhere, earlier this month Jeffrey Epstein’s co-collaborator’s brother, Ian Maxwell, penned a feature for ‘The Spectator’ in which he claimed: “My sister Ghislaine was denied justice. The whole system was designed to convict, not to find the truth.” Going further, he tellingly showed his family’s arrogance in adding: “Ghislaine became a replacement for Epstein… The evidence is clear that Ghislaine believed herself to be free of guilt. Had she even suspected that she might be arrested she would have fled beyond the reach of the US legal system to France, of which she is a citizen.” Here, indeed, are a family who believe the law should not apply to them; this is a family who consider themselves above the law and, just like the late tax evader Leona Helmsley, above the “little people.”
  • Knickers In A Twist – Harry’s £800k Pants – Royal Underpants For Auction

    Knickers In A Twist – Harry’s £800k Pants – Royal Underpants For Auction

    Former Las Vegas stripper attempts to auction drippy Prince Harry’s black underpants for the ludicrous sum of £800,000; who on earth would want these soiled goods?

    Whilst interest in Tom Bower’s book on them, Revenge: Meghan, Harry and the war between the Windsors, continues to ignite the passions of the Twitterati in spite of it actually revealing very little new, a former Las Vegas stripper is now selling a pair of black underpants Prince Charles’s second son gave her in August 2012 because she quite rightly believes he’s become a “bore.”

     

    Set to be auctioned on 17th August this year at the Hustler Club in Las Vegas, what the Mirror described as a “raunchy keepsake” have been guided at £800,000 ($963,000, €942,000 or درهم3.5 million) along with the dress and swimsuit worn by British born Carrie Reichert (now known as ‘Carrie Royale’ and formerly nicknamed ‘Lady Dominique’) on the occasion when she met a man she dubbed then “fun Harry.”

     

    Speaking of why she is selling now, 43-year-old Reichert told the paper:

     

    “Harry has become such a bore, it’s a real shame. When he partied in Vegas, everyone loved him and his sense of fun. At least these pants are a reminder of what he used to be like… when Harry was the fun prince.”

     

    “It’s a shame he’s all po-faced and serious these days. Even as a married dad of two, he should still let his hair down now and again – what’s left of it any way.”

     

    Elsewhere dubbed “miserable and pompous” following his speech last week to a virtually empty room at the United Nations on Mandela Day, the Duke of Sussex continues to cause trouble for his relatives. This morning, the MailOnline’s Stewart Case shared news that the royal renegade “is reported to have completed his eagerly awaited autobiography.

     

    Of it, Case claimed “publisher Random House is aiming for the book to be out in time for the Thanksgiving and Christmas Holidays, when it could be marketed as a gift.” Frankly, who on earth would want it – apart from ‘MeGain’ and perhaps also PR peddler Omid Scobie?

     

    Pictured top – An especially unkempt and miserable looking Duke of Sussex at the United Nations in New York last week with his very ambitious crackpot wife sat alongside looking, as ever, as if she is the cat that well and truly got the cream.

     

    Carrie Reichert Carrie Royale
    Of the underwear story, ‘The Sun’ ran today with the headline: “Get ‘Em Orf’ and shared its previous front page of the royal in the buff – published on Friday 24th August 2012 in “Britain’s most popular paper” as a “souvenir printed edition.”
    UN speech
    The speech by the Duke of Sussex clearly wasn’t exactly welcomed at the United Nations given how many empty seats there were when he got up to ramble and rant and interfere in matters that he has no actual qualification. Here is a mouse-not-a-man who is, a bit like Boris Johnson, controlled by his pugnacious puppet mistress. What a shame that this once “fun loving” has become nothing but a drip and a hypocrite who brings nothing but shame on his relatives.
    Soulmate and Inmate Duke and Duchess of Sussex
    Twitter users compared the Duke of Sussex to an “inmate” and referenced his wife – who notably kept grabbing him by the hand during their visit to the UN in a most controlling fashion – as a “soulmate.” Frankly, they’d have done better to term her “prison governess.”
    Miserable
    Whilst the wicked wastrel woman formerly known as Meghan Markle looked utterly smug during their appearance in New York, her husband sat looking utterly trapped. The expression on his face was not of a man happy with his lot, but one of someone who looks utterly trapped. Life in America and away from his caring family clearly does not suit this spoilt little twerp and at some point, most likely, he will definitely try and escape.
  • Dershowitz Ditched – Larry David Snubs Alan Dershowitz

    Dershowitz Ditched – Larry David Snubs Alan Dershowitz

    As he faces a court showdown with Virginia Roberts Giuffre, Ghislaine Maxwell apologist Alan Dershowitz gets deservedly snubbed by his now former friend Larry David

    Seinfeld and Curb Your Enthusiasm star Larry David was rightly lauded after calling out the lawyer and Ghislaine Maxwell apologist Alan Dershowitz as “disgusting” last week after “bumping into him at a grocery store in Martha’s vineyard.”

     

    In an interview by telephone with Isaac Chotiner – published in The New Yorker on Tuesday 19th July – the emeritus professor of law at Harvard declared he had been “cancelled” for “daring to defend” Donald Trump and stated of his encounter with David:

     

    “What happened is – it’s interesting because I was having lunch with a very radical lawyer who loves me. I mean, he disagrees with me. We argue all the time, but he is not part of the Chilmark crowd. So I was having lunch with him and then a number of other people were there. Suddenly, Larry David walks in to buy some groceries. I say, ‘Hey. Hi, Larry,’ and he turns away, and he just walks away. I say, ‘Larry, can’t we at least talk?’ He said, ‘No. You’re disgusting.’”

     

    “He said, ‘I saw you pat Mike Pompeo on the back.’ It’s true. I did. Here’s the story. It was the Abraham Accords, or the movement toward peace in Israel under the Trump Administration, which I played a central role in.”

     

    He said, ‘I saw you pat Mike Pompeo on the back.’ It’s true. I did. Here’s the story. It was the Abraham Accords, or the movement toward peace in Israel under the Trump Administration, which I played a central role in.”

     

    Asked if he’d watch Curb Your Enthusiasm again, the leading Ghislaine Maxwell apologist curtly responded:

     

    “No. Because I know that the Larry David that’s in Curb Your Enthusiasm is not a fictional character. He’s the real Larry David… If you know that he’s the real Larry David, that curmudgeon, the nasty guy.”

     

    Elsewhere last week, Virginia Roberts Giuffre – whom accuses Dershowitz of sexually abusing her on at least 6 occasions and claims him to be “engaging in revisionist history” – revealed that she is seeking a date of March 2023 for their defamation. The lawyer and retired Harvard professor has previously claimed to have never met the woman Prince Andrew paid £12 million to in spite of also claiming to have never her and has also called her a “certified, complete, total liar.”

     

    Pictured top – Comedian and actor Larry David in a ‘Make America Great Again’ baseball cap (left) and lawyer Alan Dershowitz enjoying a giggle with the late croaked paedophile Jeffrey Epstein (right).

     

    BBC
    The BBC was rightly forced to apologise for giving the loudmouth lawyer airtime in December 2021 after Ghislaine Maxwell’s conviction in New York. On Twitter, their press team declared giving the lawyer the opportunity to speak “did not meet the BBC’s editorial standards.” They added that they subsequently realized that he “was not a suitable person to interview as an impartial analyst, and we did not make the relevant background clear to our audience.” They concluded: “We will look into how this happened” yet unsurprisingly no heads subsequently rolled.
    Harvard
    Dershowitz and Epstein pictured together at a Harvard event. The pair liked to portray themselves as sophisticated, but frankly both of them have ended up as being portrayed as grasping, grubby gropers. Of the latter, the former told the ‘Miami Herald’ in June: “Everybody missed it. My wife and I never saw young girls at that house. There was never a young girl in that house. There was never a picture of a young girl in that house. There were pictures of [former President Bill] Clinton, and other prominent people.” Of Virginia Roberts Giuffre, he added: “I want all the $20 million [in civil settlements] she’s gotten to be taken away from her and given to the real victims,” Dershowitz said. “Which I will do. I want her to go to prison for committing massive perjury. This case will never be over until Virginia Giuffre pays the price for her false accusations.”
    Red wine
    Dershowitz (left) drinking red wine with Epstein (centre) and former Treasury Secretary and later Harvard President Lawrence Summers (right) at a Harvard sponsored event on 9th September 2004 in Cambridge, Massachusetts.
    Virginia Roberts Giuffre
    At the likely March 2023 trial, lawyers for Roberts Giuffre (pictured above) intend to call in-person witnesses (aside from herself) including David Boies, Sigrid McCawley, Brad Edwards, Paul Cassell, David Stone and Epstein’s first known British victim, Anouska de Georgiou.
    Alan Dershowitz was played by Ron Silver in the 1990 American drama film ‘Reversal of Fortune’ with Jeremy Irons as Claus von Bülow and Glenn Close as Sunny von Bülow. The 111-minute film grossed £12.3 million at the box office and was lauded for its “exceptional performances” and “cunning script.”
  • Biden To Pardon Ghislaine? Stranger things…

    Biden To Pardon Ghislaine? Stranger things…

    As it is suggested ‘Sleepy Joe’ Biden might pardon Ghislaine Maxwell, Matthew Steeples suggests that notion to be highly doubtful

    Prime Ministers, Presidents and dictators have long been known to kowtow to media moguls. Be it Adolf Hitler with the 1st Viscount Rothermere and both Margaret Thatcher and Tony Blair with Rupert Murdoch, the power of the titans that control the press is long known but this week’s suggestion that Joe Biden might pardon Ghislaine Maxwell seems a little beyond ludicrous.

     

    Featured as the cover story by the American tabloid the National Enquirer – a title best known for its “catch and kill” strategies and for its photographer Ron Galella’s harassment case with Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis in the 1970s – in their 25th July edition, Peter Sheridan of BoingBoing.net highlighted this in his ‘The Tabloids’ column.

     

    Responding to the headline “MAXWELL SELLS OUT TRUMP! Epstein MADAM dealing for PARDON from BIDEN” – which was accompanied by subheadings including “wild and WICKED parties!” and “What she KNOWS about MELANIA!” – Sheridan called it out as a “will o’ the wisp yarn” that is “wildly speculative.”

     

    Going further, he adds:

     

    “According to this tabloid of record: ‘Imprisoned child sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell has told authorities she’s ready to squeal on party pal Donald Trump in a desperate bid to get out of jail before she dies.’”

     

    “Presumably because getting out of jail after she dies isn’t optimal.”

     

    “If Maxwell was going to plea bargain, it would have been before her conviction and sentencing to 20 years imprisonment, not afterwards when she is now relying on a rare presidential pardon or commuted sentence.”

     

    “If Biden pardoned Maxwell just to nail Trump, he would be excoriated for making a purely political move that blatantly offers an incentive to Maxwell to potentially lie about the former president to win her freedom.”

     

    “Apart from the fact that Maxwell is a convicted criminal whose word can hardly be trusted, how could she prove any allegation she levels against Trump?”

     

    “The story isn’t even supported by evidence that Maxwell has requested such a deal. The best the Enquirer can come up with is a New York attorney who says: ‘After hearing her sentence, Ghislaine may have realised she has no other options but to sing.’”

     

    Monstrous media mogul turned pension pot plunderer’s daughter Miss Maxwell (AKA Mrs Scott Borgerson, ‘Jennifer Ellmax,’ ‘Jen Marshall,’ ‘Janet Marshall’ and just plain old ‘G’) certainly, however, has been photographed with Donald Trump on multiple occasions and clearly got along with him well.

     

    It must be remembered that Maxwell – whose odds of a pardoning from Trump were at 3/1 before he left office – was showed no mercy from her former friend, the 45th POTUS. He did, however, pardon another media mogul, his chum the convicted fraudster and former Daily Telegraph owner, Lord (Conrad) Black, and in doing so most definitely gave the now convicted mucky madam sex offender the finger.

     

    Allegations also that Melania Trump was trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein continue to do the rounds also and rotting in her cell, Maxwell, may finally realise her ‘friends’ have turned her and it’s time for her to turn on them. Stranger things, perhaps, indeed, have happened… The ‘Grubby Ghislaine’ show, after all, is the unwanted gift that keeps on giving.

     

    Pictured top – The latest edition of the ‘National Enquirer’ features a cover story that reads: “MAXWELL SELLS OUT TRUMP! Epstein MADAM dealing for PARDON from BIDEN” (left); Maxwell pictured on the infamous ‘Lolita Express’ with Bill Clinton (right).

     

    Margaret Thatcher
    Due to his power British Prime Ministers had to take his calls – Robert Maxwell with Margaret Thatcher in 1985 at Mirror Group Newspapers.
    George H. W. Bush
    American politicians were not immune to him either – Robert Maxwell with President George H. W. Bush and his wife Barbara circa 1989.
    Rupert Murdoch
    Other media tycoons had to spend time with him also – Robert Maxwell with Rupert Murdoch in 1969.
    Diana, Princess of Wales
    The royals clearly had to keep him onside also – Diana, Princess of Wales was photographed with ‘Bouncing Bob’ on multiple occasions.
    The Prime Minister who would do anything to keep the media mogul on side – In later years and now even still, Tony Blair has kowtowed to Rupert Murdoch again and again.
    Mirror
    Ironically, after he died at sea in November 1991, Robert Maxwell was remembered on the front page of the paper whose pension pot he had shamelessly plundered with the headline: “The man who saved the Daily Mirror.” Now, one is left asking: “Will Joe Biden actually save this tyrant’s favourite child?”
  • Mandela & MeGain – Duke & Duchess of Sussex trend on Twitter as hypocrites and liars

    Mandela & MeGain – Duke & Duchess of Sussex trend on Twitter as hypocrites and liars

    As the Duke and Duchess of Sussex are slammed as “hypocrites” and “liars,” they perform another “PR stunt” in announcing a forthcoming speech on Mandela Day

    “At Archewell, we unleash the power of compassion to drive systemic cultural change” begin the Duke and Duchess of Sussex on the website for their “non-profit.” They continue by referencing the noun “Arche” as a “Greek word meaning ‘source of action’” and “Well” as “a plentiful source or supply; a place we go to dig deep.”

     

    Trending this morning on Twitter with hashtags including #PrinceHarryisaLiar, #PrinceHarryisaHypocrite, #PrinceHarryisaRacist, #MeghanMarkleisaLiar, #MeghanMarkleisaBully and #MeghanMarkleisaNarcissist, Yahoo!News yesterday reported Prince Harry will be “relaunch[ing] his career as a global humanitarian with a keynote address to the United Nations in New York next week to mark Nelson Mandela day” on Monday next.

     

    Described by the publication’s Tom Sykes as an attempt to “flirt with increasingly political causes” and an attempt to “turn a page on the humiliations they suffered during their visit to England for the Platinum Jubilee, where snubs by the royals, which included being seated behind the Duke of Gloucester in a church service and being banned from appearing with the Queen,” here is another example of the decidedly drippy but also deviant duo yet again stirring the pot.

     

    Rightly, Sykes pointed out “many observers were left wondering what the purpose of their appearance was” and resultingly on Twitter, condemnation and mockery followed.

     

    In separate news, the noxious nuisance formerly known as Meghan Markle has failed in her attempt to dismiss her half-sister’s defamation suit against her whilst the singer Dolly Parton’s sister has come out in support of the actress turned activist.

     

    Stella Parton stated: “I think more people should speak out when they see phony [sic] people in high places thinking their snooty behavior is ok. I also think it’s very telling of Meghan’s sister to change her name back to Markle then use it to trash her little half-sister.”

     

    Twitter 1
    Twitter users including @DuchessPnocchio reacted to the trending topics about Prince Charles’ second son and his wife by stating “let’s keep this trend rolling.” The intense dislike for the pair of pontificating prattlers continues to grow.
    Twitter 2
    Another @tartanpirate1 added: “Guess his past misdemeanors have come back to bite him. That’s what you get when you Nelson Mandela, the global freedom fighter against Apartheid as a PR stunt to launch your business. Still standing on the back of others, eh?”
    Twitter 3
    @LemonTrifle concluded: “2 of the most hypocritical, deplorable people ever to step foot off a private jet and sashay into the UN to record private conversations on hidden recording equipment.” Here, indeed, are a couple that are considered an embarrassment to the royal family and here is a pair who have proven themselves to be not at all private – as they had claimed they wanted to be – but instead publicity seeking personal profiteers.

    Can anyone solve a problem like ‘MeGain’?

    • In November 2021, the duchess was forced to apologise to the Appeal Court in London for making a misleading statement in her privacy case against The Mail on Sunday’s publishers.
    • Her very own father, Thomas, has called out her many untruths about him and others again, again and again.
    • Of her claiming having got married the day before she actually did, Mr Markle stated: “Lying about the archbishop? How can you say: ‘We’ve been married three days before we got married’? Her lies are so obvious, I don’t know why she says them.”
    • Her very own half-sister, Samantha, has called her out as a liar on multiple occasions also. It has been proven that the duchess’s claim that she hasn’t seen her sibling in over 20 years was proven untrue when a photo of the pair 13 years ago emerged.
    • Her very own half-brother, Thomas Jr., said of her: “I told Prince Harry, I think she’s going to ruin your life. She’s very shallow… She’s a phony, a bully, a jaded, shallow, conceited woman.”
    • The former Meghan Markle has been called out on multiple occasions for spinning stories against other members of the royal family, most especially the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge.
    • Staff who’ve worked for her have complained that she is a bully and investigations into this remain ongoing.
    • The Duchess of Sussex is a known manipulator of the press and paparazzis and it has been claimed that she’ll “twist the truth” to get any headline she wants.
    • Questions remain as to how many times she’s actually been married in total. Some say twice, some say thrice.
    • “Would you trust this woman with a bargepole?” is something often asked of this money motivated minx.

     

  • Not So Arresting Andy – Prince Andrew Could Be Next FBI Arrest Target

    Not So Arresting Andy – Prince Andrew Could Be Next FBI Arrest Target

    As mendacious mucky madam Ghislaine Maxwell is set to rot in the clink for 20 years, her mouthy mucker mate Prince Andrew may be arrested by the FBI

    The non-sweating nosebag nosher who paid £12 million to a woman he supposedly never met Prince Andrew may never be able to set foot on American soil again.

     

    The Duke of York – whose coffin dodging chum Bernie Ecclestone again shoved his hooves in the proverbial yesterday by again senselessly claiming he’d “take a bullet for Putin” – is, the New York Post revealed, to be targeted by lawyers for victims of his late croaked paedophile bestie, Jeffrey Epstein, and his now incarcerated co-collaborator and convicted sex offender, Ghislaine Maxwell.

     

    Of this juicy development for the non-sweating “favourite” son of the Queen, Spencer Kuvin, a lawyer for several of the victims of Epstein and Maxwell, told the Mirror: “Obviously, Andrew is one of the targets they will be looking into. He should definitely be concerned, but, if he did nothing wrong, then come forward and tell the full story to the FBI, not the media.”

     

    The paper’s United States editor Christopher Bucktin observed: “Mr Kuvin named other targets, which included another Briton” and going further the lawyer who secured Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s out-of-court settlement with the royal, Brad Edwards, stated: “Let’s hope they’re the next target. If we have anything to do with it, they will be.”

     

    Speaking to The Sun subsequently, Kuvin surmised: “Anyone who took advantage of a minor as a result of being provided that minor by Mr Epstein or Ms Maxwell should be prosecuted as well.”

     

    “It is highly unlikely an extradition would ever occur, so the Prince would have to be here in the US and be arrested while he’s here.”

     

    “Tell Prince Andrew he should spend the summer here in the US. Come on over to vacation.”

     

    Contrasting elsewhere and yet again sticking her oar in where it is not wanted, Lady Victoria Hervey has been doing the rounds with appearances on Channel 5 News and GB News to again claim the 2001 photograph of the then Miss Roberts and Prince Andrew at Ghislaine Maxwell’s then Belgravia home to be a fake.

     

    Speaking to the Daily Mail’s Richard Eden this morning, the aristocrat laughably concluded: “It’s so sad what’s happened to Andrew.”

     

    In other news on Friday in ‘The Sun,’ the prince was slammed by Paul Page, a Buckingham Palace armed protection officer in the 1990s and 2000s. He observed: “He’s a self-absorbed, obnoxious, horrible little man who is disrespectful to those below him… Andrew has something to hide and he has questions to answer – but I don’t think he will ever be in a position where he will have to answer them because of who he is. He’s got the ‘HRH’ title in front of his name, Ghislaine hasn’t – where is she? Jail. Where is he? At home. Simple as that.” Speaking previously of the relationship between his former boss and Ghislaine Maxwell, the former police officer stated: “From the way she was allowed to enter and exit the palace, at will, we realised… suspected, that she may have had an intimate relationship with Prince Andrew. A colleague of mine remembered her coming in four times in one day from the morning till the evening – she kept coming in and out, in and out.”
    Twitter users called for the FBI to go after ‘Randy Andy’ with one remarking: “WHY should Prince Andrew be allowed to avoid prosecution? By paying the women he allegedly abused, he’s admitted guilt. I hope the FBI keep chasing him down.” Another added: “If Ghislaine Maxwell was a British Princess and Prince Andrew was just a ‘socialite,’ Ghislaine would be walking free right now and Andrew would be spending 20 years in prison. Being royalty is a Get Out of Jail Free card.”
    44 Kinnerton Street 10th March 2001
    Whilst Lady Victoria Hervey may peddle her belief that the photograph taken of Prince Andrew, the then Virginia Roberts and Ghislaine Maxwell at 44 Kinnerton Street, Belgravia, London, SW1 on the evening of the 10th March 2001 is a fake, others including the photographer who photographed the original photograph in 2011, New Zealander Michael Thomas, takes an entirely different view. Speaking to the ‘New Zealand Herald’ in February, Thomas remarked: “As I have said before, it was just an ordinary photo you would have got from a chemist in the days of negatives. Surely, if it was fake, every media outlet in the world would be getting sued for using it. The fact that isn’t happening, to me says everything.” Of the image, previously in 2019, Thomas commented: “It wasn’t like she pulled the photo of Prince Andrew out, it was just in among the rest of them. They were just typical teenage snaps. There’s no way that photo is fake.”