Where has the never-normally-far-from-the-limelight meddling menace formerly known as Meghan Markle vanished to?
A woman known normally for displaying more front than Harrods, the deviant diva that is the Duchess of Sussex has literally vanished off the face of the planet. Normally, as she has repeatedly said in the past “always moving together,” the fact that the “like salt and pepper” duo that are her and her hapless husband have not been seen together in weeks is telling.
Said by some to be allowing Prince Harry his own space to promote his tittle-tattling tome Spare, ‘Moaning Meg’ is likely, given the flooding that devastated the surrounding area recently, not at her £14 million Montecito mansion.
Instead, this hard-faced harridan, it has been claimed, could have returned to her old chums from her Suits days in Canada or possibly headed to Washington to begin what she supposedly desires most next – a career in politics. As Prince Harry once said: “What Meghan wants, Meghan gets” and a frontline role in the Democratic Party is very much on her tick list.
For this former actress, this move would likely, however, come too soon. Presently, even the once loathed and detested Queen Consort, Camilla, is more popular than her in America – with an official poll ranking the former -13 and the latter -8.
Aside from facing upto and settling a lawsuit from her far more sensible sister, Samantha Markle, it might be better for this deranged duchess to do something else. It is time for this alleged former ‘yacht girl’ to Prince Andrew to head off to Siberia and if they’re not divorcing – as some have predicted – she ought to take her seriously stupid sidekick with her; ‘MeGain’ ought to get gone and simply never come back.
Editor’s Note – Unlike as is the case in many publications, this article was NOT sponsored or supported by a third-party.
Where has the mendacious menace formerly known as Meghan Markle vamoosed to? She has literally vanished off the face of the planet but where has she gone?
Of her claiming having got married the day before she actually did, Mr Markle stated: “Lying about the archbishop? How can you say: ‘We’ve been married three days before we got married’? Her lies are so obvious, I don’t know why she says them.”
Her very own half-sister, Samantha Markle, who is currently bringing a defamation case against her, has called her out as a liar on multiple occasions also. It has been proven that the duchess’s claim that she hasn’t seen her sibling in over 20 years was untrue given a photo of the pair together 14 years ago proves quite to the contrary.
Her very own half-brother, Thomas Jr., said of her: “I told Prince Harry, I think she’s going to ruin your life. She’s very shallow… She’s a phony, a bully, a jaded, shallow, conceited woman.”
The wife of Prince Harry has been called out on multiple occasions for spinning stories against other members of the royal family, most especially the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge.
Staff who’ve worked for her have complained that she is a bully and investigations into this remain ongoing.
The Duchess of Sussex is a known manipulator of the press and paparazzis and it has been claimed that she’ll “twist the truth” to get any headline she wants.
Questions remain as to how many times she’s actually been married in total. Some say twice, some say thrice.
What’s the truth about Meghan’s mother Doria Ragland? Is this clearly equally manipulative woman an honest and decent citizen or is she a jailbird who has spent time in the clink?
Did the ‘Montecito Meddler’ meet Prince Andrew or Prince Harry first? Rumours abound that she could have spent time and holidayed with the former as long ago as 2001 and that her claim to have no prior knowledge of the royal family until 2016 is just utter baloney.
Could the Duchess of Sussex be with her allegedly gay ‘bestie’ Markus Anderson? The Soho House employee is always close to anything murky that is going on with this mendacious minx and he’s undoubtedly the first person she turns to with any problem.Could the wicked wench formerly known as Meghan Markle be with her ever-willing to say anything she tells him PR peddler Omid Scobie? Prince Harry has made out that ‘Finding Freedom’ included clear lies in recent days whilst promoting ‘Spare’ and in response Scobie has clearly begun to turn on his masters. In comments, reported on in the ‘Daily Express,’ the ‘author’ remarked: “In many ways, how can a regular person not have Sussex fatigue at this point? I almost feel it’s like my duty to follow it every step of the way, but I can understand how general members of the public have just had enough of hearing about the royal dramas in general. I sympathise with the Sussexes in some ways, because they’re only now getting to join the story at this very late stage. For many years, they weren’t able to share their side. They watched others try and tell versions of it or they sat back and watched things reported about them that they didn’t agree with or didn’t feel were a fair representation of themselves. So now they’ve come in with their versions of events, with their stories and are filling in the gaps that we didn’t know about. But of course, it comes after years and years of coverage. So, I think people are starting to get a little tired of the story in general.”Could the deranged diva Duchess of Sussex and her mouthy mother Doria Ragland be hiding out in Canada or could she be spinning herself into the world of politics in Washington even? The truth is always stranger than fiction with ‘MeGain’ and God only knows what this psycho will do next.
Ninety-minute interview with Samantha Markle watched by over 40,000 since premiering 13 hours ago; in it the Duchess of Sussex’s sister slams both her and her husband Prince Harry
Fresh from having shared several stories with The Steeple Times in recent weeks, the sensible sister of the murky meddler formerly known as Meghan Markle gave a 1:31-minute interview on Friday evening on Shaun Attwood’s YouTube channel.
In it, Matthew Steeples and Jennifer Hopkins joined Attwood for a wide-ranging chat with Samantha Markle that delved into the fallout from Prince Harry’s tittle-tattling tome Spare. Markle spoke via telephone and didn’t mince her words and whilst Attwood and Hopkins calmly moderated, Steeples added a somewhat ‘refreshed’ perspective with some punchy questions and observations.
Beginning with a focus on the book that most would rather be actually ‘spared’ from, other topics included numbered the situation created by Marlene Headley (AKA ‘Ngozi Fulani’) with Lady Susan Hussey and her charity being under investigation by the Charity Commission. Allegations about the Duke of Sussex being involved in an incident in Jamaica, Christopher Bouzy and Omid Scobie’s PR peddling and those lies about Air New Zealand tickets were also touched upon.
Commenting afterwards, viewer Tracey Reed observed: “This is the most forthright interview I’ve seen with Samantha yet.” Another, going by the pseudonym ‘Ten Ten,’ added: “Samantha Markle is so well spoken and articulate. She delivers such complexity in such a clear manner. It’s evident that she’s a very intelligent person and a very genuine person.”
Editor’s Note – Unlike as is the case in many publications, this article was NOT sponsored or supported by a third-party. Follow Matthew Steeples on Twitter at @M_Steeples.
Pictured Top – Samantha Markle with her sister Meghan in happier times prior to the latter ghosting her birth family.
Shaun Attwood’s YouTube channel has over 744,000 subscribers and though any video uploaded there tends to trend as a result, that this particular episode has attracted over 40,000 views in just 13 hours is telling of the interest in the saga of Prince Harry and his decidedly deviant other half.
Separately in a poll yesterday, Matthew Steeples asked his Twitter followers: “Where is Meghan Markle hiding out?” The majority response thus far from the 400 who’ve voted are of the belief that she is back in Canada. It remains to be seen if that is the case and what this currently very unusually and strangely silent woman will do next.Jennifer Hopkins and Shaun Attwood took the lead in questioning Samantha Markle in an interview conducted by telephone on Friday evening and premiered at 9pm on Sunday 15th January 2022.Mockery of Prince Harry’s memoir ‘Spare’ has been relentless since its launch earlier this month. It seems that the Duke of Sussex has well and truly dug a hole and has continued to fail to realise that when you’re in a hole, it is generally wise to stop digging.What’s next for this deviant duo? Money motivated and revenge reekers most definitely, the popularity of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex has plummeted since not only the publication of ‘Spare’ but also since that God awful interview with Oprah Winfrey in 2021. A recently released YouGov poll found: “Just 26% of Britons have a positive view of Prince Harry, the lowest level since we started tracking in 2011. This represents a seven-point drop since the previous survey in early December. Currently, approach two thirds of Britons (64%) have a negative view of the fifth in line to the throne, up from 59%. Even younger Britons, who generally tended to hold favourable views of Prince Harry, are now divided, with 41% having a positive impression and 41% a negative one. In December’s survey there had been a twenty-point lead, with 49% holding a positive view and 29% a negative one.”Some Sainsbury’s stores have confined the Duke of Sussex’s book to where it truly belongs – next to the bog roll. In other shops it has been placed next to wet wipes and even Bella Mackie’s book ‘How To Kill Your Family.’
Air New Zealand call out Prince Harry’s lies about bookings to fly Thomas Markle and again illustrate that him and ‘Mendacious Meg’ find the truth highly inconvenient
Whilst also Sir Freddie admitted this his “devotion to his work possibly short-changed all his wives,” another frequent flyer with a problematic wife – though generally himself prone to using land of olive oil production loving Sir Elton John’s private jets rather than anything as common as Easyjet – named the Duke of Sussex has been called out after telling ‘porky pies’ about booking flights with Air New Zealand in his tittle-tattling tome Spare.
Responding to claims in the book that the former Meghan Markle’s now husband had booked first-class flights to bring her father, Thomas, to Britain from Mexico, the airline yesterday tweeted: “Introducing #SussexClass. Apparently, coming soon.”
Air New Zealand later added that it has never operated flights between Mexico and the United Kingdom and equally confirmed, that they do not offer a first-class service. Speaking to the New Zealand Herald, a spokesperson for the firm very clearly added: “We’ve never had flights between Mexico and the UK. And we only have Business Premier.”
Responding on social media, members of the Twitterati then understandably piled on – with one writing: “Any spare seats, anyone?”
Editor’s Note – Unlike as is the case in many publications, this article was NOT sponsored or supported by a third-party.
The tweet in question has well and truly made yet another mockery of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex.Sir Freddie Laker’s remarkable life story was immortalised in a book by Roger Eglin and Berry Ritchie in 1980.Here was a frequent flyer who was a lot more fun than the noxious nuisances that are the Duke and Duchess of Sussex.Described as a “Russian oligarch kind of jet,” the Bombardier Global 6000 aircraft that the couple returned to California on from Farnborough in June 2022 emitted nearly 60 tonnes of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. Of this, the ‘Daily Mail’ stated: “Under the terms of the Paris Agreement objective of keeping global warming below 2C, each person’s carbon budget should be no more than 2.1 tonnes per year – meaning Harry and Meghan exceeded this by nearly 15 times in just one flight. As the Sussexes also flew into Britain on a private jet, and assuming it was the same aircraft, their overall return trip would have exceeded the annual limit by nearly 30 times. By comparison, the carbon emission rating of flying from Heathrow to LA in an economy-class seat on a commercial aircraft is 1.4 tonnes, according to climate consultancy Cube6.” They added: “The Queen’s grandson previously described climate change as one of the ‘most pressing issues we are facing’, and told Oprah Winfrey during the couple’s bombshell interview last year: ‘We need to do better about stopping or allowing the things that are causing so much harm to so many of us at the source, rather than being distracted by the symptom.’”In September 2019, it was reported that since marrying the alleged former “yacht girl” Meghan Markle, the now King Charles III’s second son is said to have used private plans for six out of ten flights despite claiming to travel commercial 99% of the time. Here is a condescending couple who tell others what to do and then who themselves go and do the exact opposite without shame or explanation.
The pathetic attention seeking son of the late Diana, Princess of Wales has previously claimed that his decision to use private aircraft is because he is determined to “keep his family safe.” Clearly immune to the fact that the vast majority of the public who fly commercial are perfectly safe, here is a brat who clearly has no conception of how hypocritical he and his sordid sidekick truly are.
Matthew Steeples suggests Prince Harry’s revolting revelations about his “todger” to be inappropriate given he moved to the US to become a more “private” person
It has become clearer and clearer in recent days that Prince Harry doesn’t understand the concept of “public” and “private.” Whilst this renegade royal moved to America in 2016 as he and his wicked wastrel wife supposedly didn’t want to be “public” anymore, their inability to remain “private” in the time since is proof that here are a mendacious pair of meddlers with no concept that with “rights” come “responsibilities.”
Turning to another “private member” mentioned in his memoirs Spare – of which every single member of the public I’ve spoken with since their release has responded with words to the effect of: “Please SPARE us anymore from that drip” – this morning, the Daily Mail’s Richard Eden shared a retweet that included a clip of the Duke of Sussex reading aloud from his tittle-tattling tome.
In his tweet – captioned “Have a listen to this clip, if you dare… #PrinceHarry #Spare #royal” – Eden tellingly selected a tweet by a former Penguin Random House book editor named Dominic Wakeford.
In that tweet, Wakeford – whose former employers, of course, are the publishers of Spare – wrote: “This book is a Freudian nightmare.” The tweet has, to date, been shared some 5,000 times and liked by over 56,000 accounts and in it, a 0:33-second clip read by King Charles III’s second son is included.
Prince Harry shockingly shares:
“My penis was oscillating between extremely sensitive and borderline traumatised. The last place I wanted to be was Frostnipistan.”
“I’d been trying some home remedies including one recommended by a friend. She’d urged me to apply Elizabeth Arden cream. ‘My mum used that on her lips. You want me to put that on my todger?’ ‘It works Harry, trust me.’”
“I found the tube and the minute I opened it, the smell transported me through time. It felt as if though my mother was right there in the room and I took a smidge and applied it down there.”
Responding, one member of the Twitterati observed: “He’s thinking of his mother as he applies the cream to his nether regions. My God, he really is a tuppence short of a shilling and what bright spark thought this was worthy of inclusion? I’m certain Harry expected the sympathy vote, but he comes across as stark raving mad!”
Another added of the former Meghan Markle’s puppet’s product placement attempt: “For years, Elizabeth Arden has been my trusty companion. I can never feel the same about it EVER again. I mean, I knew it was a cure, but…”
Editor’s Note – Unlike as is the case in many publications, this article was NOT sponsored or supported by a third-party.
Pictured Top – The world has reacted to the Duke of Sussex’s first ‘book’ by mocking him mercilessly. Aside from mocking him up as a “colossal tit,” this randy royal’s raging romps have been shot down by booksellers also. In Swindon, a “cheeky” retailer named Bert’s Books displayed ‘Spare’ next to a copy of Bella Mackie’s ‘How To Kill Your Family” in what Sky News termed a “light-hearted nod to his allegations against the royal family.”
Prior to getting it on with the mendacious menace then known as Meghan Markle – a wicked wastrel woman whom may have been married twice or maybe even three times – the second son of the late Diana, Princess of Wales was quite happy to fool around in all sorts of ways – some more curious than others. Whether Elizabeth Arden creams were involved remains unknown.Elsewhere this morning on social media emails sent ‘Ginge and Cringe’ have been doing the rounds. In one of them came yet again further proof that these rotten ratbag royals DID cooperate with Omid Scobie and Carolyn Durand for their – like ‘Spare’ now also – bargain basement bag-of-bilge book about their avaricious antics. It is time now for Omid Scobie to be called out for what he truly is; here is not an independent minded author but here instead is a pointless puppet controlled PR peddler answerable to only woman – the mendacious menace formerly known as Meghan Markle.Another popular royal commentary account on Twitter going by the name ‘FawnOverMeGain’ went further and shared allegations about the Duke of Sussex on Tuesday. Whilst we very clearly point out that these allegations are completely unsubstantiated as of the present moment, that the tempestuous royal is accused of “making Prince Andrew look like a saint” is most definitely notable.
The Twitterati reacts to the Duke of Sussex sharing a sickening story about his “private member” (and a pugnacious plug for Elizabeth Arden’s cosmetic products)…
As Prince Harry literally shows himself as a complete prick by going on about his privates, Royal Marines commando turned acclaimed animal rescuer Pen Farthing slams him over animal suffering in Kabul
As the public ponders pugnacious Prince Harry’s ‘privates’ given his pointless prattling about his not-so-significant anything but private ‘member,’ former British Marines commando turned Nowzad Dogs charity founder Pen Farthing took to Twitter to share that the Duchess of Sussex’s drippy appendage’s antics have forced him out of Kabul.
In a series of tweets and comments, Farthing, a war hero and author of the best-selling One Dog at a Time, observed:
“We now have to deal with Taliban officials directly in every aspect of daily life here. We were trying to put what happened here behind us. We don’t need former soldiers bragging about numbers they killed, especially as it was all for nothing.”
“People were killed for no reason. I was a royalist until today. Prince Harry should have thought through the security implications for those of us still in Afghanistan trying to bring about some good.”
“It would be pretty difficult to get yourself out of any trouble you found yourself in here today, because there is no support. I just hope the Taliban don’t decide to make any examples of the ex-military they can get to.”
In other missives, both before and after his departure, he added:
“He never protected me at any point in my career thank you. And I have not targeted him. I have merely said he has been badly advised and puts former mil like me in quite a position as I am sat in Kabul… and THANK YOU for your support.”
“Because the Taliban are now the ones in power & their measured response was the Taliban he killed had families & every media outlet in the world is promoting it… Which now makes ex-forces a potential target for a revenge attack especially those on their own with no protection.”
“Well I was a Royalist until today…. Cheers #PrinceHarry You have been very badly advised I would probably say. And glad you thought through the security implications of those of us still out in #Afghanistan trying to bring about some good. #idiot #notmyprince.”
“To the idiots who made dumbass comments in support of #PrinceHarry in my tweet below, know I have had to evac from #Kabul tonight in case of potential reprisal attacks on ex-forces people like me in the wake of his badly judged memoir… The animals suffer not me. You happy?”
Whilst a few responded by coming out in support of Prince Harry’s ridiculous ramblings, the majority joined Farthing in condemning the disgrace that is now very much King Charles’s estranged second son.
Amongst responses about this “traitor” were comments that included: “He’s a disgrace to the nation,” “he’s a bell end,” and a suggestion that “[he’s] put a target on the whole country’s back and the royal family” also. “He needs serious help,” one very sensible person finally concluded.
Elsewhere, the Daily Mail’s Richard Eden shared another very relevant piece of news about the already bargain-basement bucket book. He tweeted: “If you think Prince Harry’s claims in his memoirs are shocking, imagine what he left out! His and Meghan’s cheerleader Omid Scobie says lawyers at the publisher Penguin Random House sent back FORTY-ONE pages of questions after Harry’s ghostwriter submitted a final draft.”
Editor’s Note – Unlike as is the case in many publications, this article was NOT sponsored or supported by a third-party.
Pictured Top – A war hero who now devotes his life to saving animals in conflict zones (left) and a pointless prick who spends his days profiteering and taking the dime of Netflix, Penguin Random House and Spotify (right).
Prince Harry has banged on about how he went to America to seek a more private life. In the time since he arrived there, all he has actually done instead is seek out copious amounts of publicity and sought, along with his money motivated, mendacious menace of a wife, to profiteer and drag the names of the royal and Markle families into the quagmire. Shame on him.Surely by now, even the wicked wench formerly known as Meghan Markle must realise that her stupid strategy to have become a royal without understanding that with rights comes responsibilities has well and truly backfired. This ‘Modern Day Mrs Simpson’ should be sent to Siberia as the disgraceful, disreputable pariah that she undoubtedly is and she should take her dodgy drip of a sidekick with her.
In using Twitter to share rabid rants about everything from Ribena to the royals, Omid Scobie simply shows himself as unprecedentedly awful
At Christmas some people hit the hooch whilst others hit the hay. Soppy scrag-end Omid Scobie, however, ain’t in that sphere and instead this week, he hit Twitter and went on a series of rabid rants about subjects ranging from Ribena to the royals.
In the most bizarre of his ‘Saviour’s Day’ period posts, instead of bowing down to his puppet mistress the Duchess of Sussex, this Cliff Richard-like oddity shared a picture of a Daily Mail headline banner featuring the Duchess of Cornwall and a child whose face he’d blurred. He grubbily accompanied it with the words: “Seriously, what is this sh*t?”
Given Mr Scobie supposedly aims at being some kind of holier-than-though woke warrior, his use of profanities might seem surprising, but actually they were instead indicators of the true character of this ex-clubbing bestie of the lump of junk that is Jodie Marsh.
As we move towards 2023 and a New Year in which PR peddling pillock Scobie will publish another tome of tediousness – this time titled Endgame (sadly it won’t be the end given his grim grift will no doubt then continue with Endgame 2 through to Endgame 100) – the Finding Freedom ‘co-author’ (who neglected to relay the involvement of the mendacious minx formerly known as Meghan Markle in that bargain bin book) decided to ask his followers a question.
He enquired: “What words do you feel are most overused in royal reporting?” before temptingly adding: “I’ll go first with ‘unprecedented.’”
Viewed by 254,000 people in less than 24 hours since and liked an astounding 2,600 times, this tweet was then followed with a discussion of how he and one of his groupies didn’t like the use of the word “that” being written in capital letters. How unprecedentedly dull this apologist for ‘Ginge and Cringe’ truly is. Now THAT’s over, next…
Editor’s Note – Unlike as is the case in many publications, this article was NOT sponsored or supported by a third-party.
Omid Scobie’s Christmas twittering spam…
Everything including reliable, Scobie had to make everything about himself and the woman that controls his every move this Christmas. Devoted and devoted in a deranged fashion, this moronic mouthpiece took to ‘the socials’ to declare:
“Was the great royal burgundy parade a cheeky swipe at Meghan? The evidence” clearly sent the ‘Finding Freedom’ author over the cliff and invoked fury in him unprecedented. One is only left wondering if his employers at Yahoo! consider this acceptable conduct for a journalist on their payroll. Shame on them for not calling out this very uncalled for use of the ‘s’ word.The modern-day version of the vapid vomit comet that is Pam Ayres then had to go further and asked his followers: “What words are most overused in royal reporting?” He sanctimoniously patronised his dimwitted devotees by declaring his dislike for the word “unprecedented.”He then got rather overexcited about the responses to his tweet and started, in a very childlike fashion, using emojis to express his delight that a few people were taking an interest in his frankly tedious topic. Clearly being ‘liked’ is something that Omid Scobie actually wants to achieve in 2023. To do so, he’ll need to think and learn that maybe distancing himself from ‘Ginge and Cringe’ is the only way of achieving such; back to Jodie Marsh for the Botoxed bore, we think.Concluding for Christmas, this senseless pest decided to share his views on Ribena – a perfectly likeable tipple that he clearly doesn’t like. Maybe he’s overdosed on it instead of the Kool Aid normally supplied to him by the demented dimwit formerly known as Meghan Markle.
Matthew Steeples salutes Jeremy Clarkson for expressing honest thoughts about the deviant Duchess of Sussex (and especially for causing the soppy snowflake that is ‘MeGain’s mouthpiece Omid Scobie to have a moronic meltdown as a result)
They say a “grifter’s gotta’ grift” and now that Omid Scobie’s been given another book deal courtesy of his ever-awful antics on behalf of his puppet mistress, the Duchess of Sussex, this PR peddling pillock had to yet again get his noxious knickers in a twist.
This time, Jeremy Clarkson – a man who may have finally found a subject of common ground with his love-hate rival Piers Morgan – wrote in The Sun of how much he loathes the meddling menace formerly known as Meghan Markle.
In his weekly column, Clarkson raged:
We all know in our heart of hearts that Harold Markle is a slightly dim but fun-loving chin who flew Apache helicopter gunships in Afghanistan and cavorted around Las Vegas hotel rooms with naked hookers.
But then along came Meghan, who obviously used some vivid bedroom promises to turn him into a warrior of woke.
And now it seems that she has her arm so far up his bottom, she can use her fingers to alter his facial expressions.
I actually feel rather sorry for him because today he’s just a glove puppet with no more control over what he says or does than Basil Brush.
Meghan, though, is a different story. I hate her.
Not like I hate Nicola Sturgeon or Rose West. I hate her on a cellular level.
At night, I’m unable to sleep as I lie there, grinding my teeth and dreaming of the day when she is made to parade naked through the streets of every town in Britain while the crowds chant, “Shame!” and throw lumps of excrement at her.
Everyone who’s my age thinks the same way.
But what makes me despair is that younger people, especially girls, think she’s pretty cool.
They think she was a prisoner of Buckingham Palace, forced to talk about nothing but embroidery and kittens.
That makes me even angrier. Can’t they see everything that’s happening is so very obviously pre-planned.
Leave the UK. Blame the royals. Do an interview with Oprah.
Get Basil Brush to write a book. Do a Netflix series — which should have been called A Woman, Talking Bollocks.
I can see it clearly. The studied pauses. The mock incredulity.
And the B-movie, soap-actress, quivery-voiced, more-in-sorrow-than-anger stories that are so obviously claptrap.
Do you really think she would have entertained a move to New Zealand? That’s 13 hours away from everything.
Responding on Twitter to a feature most definitely designed to stir-up the woke wazzocks of this world, the clearly very much unamused Finding Freedom ‘author’ and fake news muckspreader Scobie – whose next tittle-tattling tome, Endgame, will be speedily headed to the bargain basement bucket after publication on the 1st August 2023 – continued his ongoing attacks on the Queen Consort. Without using a question mark, the possibly 41-year-old (possibly older) ‘writer’ enquired:
“Would that be the same Jeremy Clarkson was at a private Christmas party with Camilla, the Queen Consort earlier this week (alongside guests including a Mail editor and Piers Morgan).”
Following up later, in a further muddled missive, the onetime clubbing chum of the lump of junk that is Jodie Marsh painfully prattled:
“Timewasters trying to pop up in my mentions saying Clarkson and the Queen Consort are not friends. The man literally spoke about their close friendship on ITV’s cooperative Camilla’s County Life documentary four months ago. Bye.”
Paraphrasing something Jeremy Clarkson once said of Piers Morgan back in December 2012, today we conclude: “Americans. It took us 35 years to get rid of Prince Harry. Please don’t send him or his wicked wife back and whilst you’re at it take in the rabid ratbag Omid Scobie along with the man who paid £12 million to a woman he’d supposedly never met, Prince Andrew. You can have his feckless wife, Fergie, as a ‘Brucie bonus’ given it’s Christmas. Thank you ever so much, thank you kindly.”
Editor’s Note – Unlike as is the case in many publications, this article was NOT sponsored or supported by a third-party. Follow Matthew Steeples on Twitter at @M_Steeples.
Pictured Top – Jeremy Clarkson brews beer and fools about on farms; he enjoys life and doesn’t take things too seriously. Omid Scobie, meanwhile, is simply an eternal misery and an arselicker of a mendacious meddler loathed by millions.
Prince Harry and his wife have brought more shame on the royal family in 2022 than even the mouthy moron Prince Andrew. In a year when we lost Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, that this pair decided to air their dirty linen on Netflix and Spotify is proof that they are utterly reprehensible and fit only to be sent to Siberia.After Jeremy Clarkson quite justifiably had a pop at the Duchess of Sussex, it was only to be expected that Omid Scobie would stick his rotten oar in. Reliably, when met with criticism of his whining, pathetic specimen Scobie ended another tweet about Clarkson’s article with a curt: “Bye.”It must be made clear that the ‘Finding Freedom’ author has another a book to peddle and his publishers must be giving him a bit of a hard time. Likely having had sent up a rocket up his never-sorry-arse, Scobie will likely now desperately spin all sorts of additional nonsensical yarns in the coming months.A job flogging French fries in McDonald’s might actually prove more appropriate for him by 2nd August 2023.Elsewhere on Twitter, further mockery of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex understandably followed in the wake of their disgraceful Netflix diatribe.
As fake news muckspreader Christopher Bouzy appears in Netflix’s ‘Harry & Meghan’ trailer, we remind readers of what a noxious nasty this reprehensible rubber-lipped rotter truly is
Better known as the online sensation ‘Yankee Wally,’ Quinlan provided entertainment to millions with her YouTube video missives where she shared her thoughts on the money-motivated-menace formerly known as Meghan Markle. She always brought joy, whereas Bouzy brought Barry Bollocks.
Aside from always beginning with the now much missed: “All my content is found on the public domain, it’s just my opinions and I play by the rules” [whatever they may be], Quinlan often remarked: “I thoroughly enjoy exposing the lies of Meghan Markle, and her husband is just as bad. I’m here till they lose titles and funding.” She was spot on in her analysis then and it is still as relevant now.
Now, bombastic bore Bouzy is trying get his revenge and in the tiresome trailer declared: “It’s about hatred. It’s about race.” After it released yesterday, the founder of the bag of bilge that is the Bot Sentinel founder pompously took to social media to declare:
“I guess I can officially announce I am in the Harry & Meghan docuseries.”
“I want to thank everyone who has supported Bot Sentinel’s research and allowed us to expose the targeted hate campaign against Harry and Meghan.”
Harry & Meghan premieres on Netflix tomorrow, Thursday 8th December, when tree episodes will air. An additional three installments will follow on Thursday 15th December and no doubt Christoher Bouzy’s “dirty games” will continue thereafter.
Editor’s Note – Unlike as is the case in many publications, this article was NOT sponsored or supported by a third-party or endorsed by Christopher Bouzy – a tedious twerp who bombarded Matthew Steeples with nonsense also. We’re lucky to be amongst the elite blocked by him on Twitter.
Matthew Steeples found interaction with the coder-turned-complete creep very odd, very odd indeed.‘The Times’ reacted to the Bot Sentinel founder appearing in the trailer by reminding its readers that the hateful horror had once nastily trolled the now Prince of Wales and in March 2021 remarked of him: “I am sorry but Prince William isn’t sexy, that is quarantine thirst talking. William looks like a balding Muppet.”Since declining to do the royal duties they ought jolly well have honoured, ‘Ginge & Cringe’ have lived beyond their means and made themselves out to be some kind of moral crusaders. This deranged duo have instead just turned themselves into international laughing stocks who simply live beyond their means.In the latest trailer, Prince Harry makes many a pop at his relatives and declares: “There’s a hierarchy of the family. You know, there’s leaking of stories, but there’s also planting of stories.”The Bot Sentinel founder likes to go to war with all sundry. Even Ellie Hall, a waste of space wack-job not a writer, has been subjected to being called “dishonest” by him in spite of him using her as a way of releasing “a steady flow of information.” This hypocrite deserves to be shown for what he is – rotten-to-his-never-sorry-core.Providing indication of how wicked and warped of mind he truly is, Bouzy took to Twitter on another occasion to share to mock Sadie Quinlan when it was announced that she was in hospital. This shameless cretin was then called out for being “the true hate troll he really is!” Sadly, it did not stop him continuing his hate campaign against an elderly Welsh woman, but equally, it unsurprisingly also did the opposite of what he desired and actually engendered yet more support for ‘Yankee Wally.’
Twitter reacts to the Bot Sentinel founder’s appearance in the latest Netflix trailer for ‘Harry & Meghan’…
WORLD EXCLUSIVE – Samantha Markle reacts to her sister Meghan’s Netflix trailer and the “inappropriate woke backlash” in the wake of the disgraceful mistreatment of Lady Susan Hussey
“When the stakes are this high, doesn’t it make sense to hear the story from us?” gushes the mendacious menace formerly known as Meghan Markle in the trailer for what its promoter has deemed a “Netflix global event.” Unsurprisingly, the teaser for the forthcoming bag of bilge that has been titled Harry & Meghan has already been watched 3.9 million times on YouTube alone.
Whilst a tiny minority no doubt think it acceptable for the feckless Duchess of Sussex to take a sum estimated as high as £81.3 million ($100 million, €94.9 million or درهم367.3 million) to spill her guts and those of her drippy, delusional, under-the-thumb husband without considering the fallout, her very own and by contrast sensible sister, Samantha Markle, last night reacted to it by quite rightly declaring:
“As I watched the Netflix trailer, I felt as though I was watching a Neil Sedaka style music video about a couple who believe its them alone with the world against them at all the odds.”
“It was my observation that with the love support and resources of the British royal family, that all of the odds were laid out before them, and in their favour until the point at which they seemingly wanted more and did not want to follow protocol, or be honest in their dealings.”
“Harry claimed that he would do whatever it took to protect his ‘family.’ We are confused because for all intents and purposes, the royal family certainly is a large, lifelong family, and worthy of said protection. The implication in the trailer, though, was that his ‘family’ only includes the Montecito microcosm and excludes the royal family and the Markles.”
“If they perceive their love as the two of them against the world in a Neil Sedaka style video, then it’s only them against the world, seemingly because they have lied about, isolated, attacked and damaged through public relations, a multitude of family members on both sides of the ocean.”
“It seems easy for them to deflect from accountability to others and recoil into their own menagerie of a microcosm, all the while packaging it as some heroic move that is worthy of awards and music, videos, and books and Netflix series. Most amazing about that trailer is its attempt to embody a fairytale at the expense of the tragedies, and tragic endings of others.”
“Respectfully, I have to say that we observed it from across the pond and it was quite shocking. Everyone I know supports Lady Susan Hussey. I was shocked at the inappropriately reactive, rather than proactive woke backlash that this lovely 83-year-old royal aide has suffered to the extent of her resignation and unjust social shaming.”
“I heard the questions that Lady Susan asked Miss Fulani and given several issues, I feel this was a tragic misinterpretation of communication.”
“Firstly, Ms Fulani was wearing a glaringly and culturally, symbolic clothing ensemble, which would arouse curiosity and questioning by any reasonable person where the attire is not customary for the region.”
“That being said, if someone were standing outside my home, wearing a Samurai ensemble or an Irish jigging ensemble or a sari, I would respectfully ask where the individual is from. If the individual said: ‘I am from here,’ I might be confused because of the unique clothing and further ask: ‘No, but where are you really from or where is your family from?’”
“I would likely be fascinated, and want to know the origins of such a unique outfit and the person wearing them. I might want to know about their family, and I would be delighted to hear more. Although, somehow that it is considered rude to ask, I think that it is rude not to ask, but rather to assume or stereotype.”
“Respectfully asking allows us to learn about other cultures and people, and this is how we grow and evolve in the large, multicultural world we live in.”
“Also, considerable and worthy of note is the fact that Lady Susan is 83-years-old and respectfully and diligently served the royal family for many, many years. She is of a different generation to Miss Fulani, so perhaps it would have been customary in most cultures to extend respect to the elderly and realise that she has a different perspective and set of norms about cultural exchange.”
“I think Lady Susan did the right thing and didn’t want to draw assumptions, but rather respected Miss Fulani by asking and caring enough to do so. Based on everything I have seen, it is my opinion that there was entrapment occurring. The set up was racially driven to stimulate controversy around the British royal family targeting an 83-year-old woman to make an example out of and to shame. It is inhumane in my opinion, and shame on those, who are so irrational, and not capable of personal integrity and maturity, or human compassion enough to find other ways to work out their personal issues regarding racism as it pertains to their own lives.”
“I think Lady Susan should have also been provided with the opportunity to learn about this woman’s culture, without being dismissed and socially shamed abruptly. This could have been a win-win situation, and given all factors and variables.”
“I believe that Lady Susan ought be restored of her dignity, respect, and social prestige that she has worked so long for, and does not deserve to be stripped of, because of what seems like a staged encounter to spin a narrative that raises the public hackles, and is unjustly damaging to the British royal family, and certainly to Lady Susan.”
“Lady Susan should be fully exonerated and this matter of seemingly false accusations, constituting, incitement and the abuse of an elderly citizen should be investigated.”
“I might also add that was has been said about Lady Susan assisting my sister at the behest of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth and reporting back that my sister was allegedly difficult seems to correlate with a motive of vindication. It is also reported that there is a link between the organisation Miss Fulani represents and my sister.”
“When I was getting my masters degrees and studying multicultural counseling, I learned that it is wrong to make assumptions about others cultures, and not ask questions, because that can be construed as stereotyping, and each individual within a population or cultural group, does not adhere to culturally specific norms. We respect individuals by asking them what their personal preferences are regarding communication and take it from there.”
“I just wanted to qualify in case anyone wonders why I am commenting when I’m not a British citizen. We are all human and with my degree in counseling, and what I know multicultural counseling I felt it was important to mention some aspects of that matter that many may have overlooked.”
Editor’s Note – Unlike as is the case in many publications, this article was NOT sponsored or supported by a third-party. Follow Matthew Steeples on Twitter at @M_Steeples.
Pictured Top (left to right) – A caricature doing the rounds of the Duchess of Sussex mocking her money motivated ways; Lady Susan Hussey, an 83-year-old whose mistreatment has been outrageous, and the then Meghan Markle with her sister, Samantha Markle, in happier times.
In exclusive comments to ‘The Steeple Times’ last night, Samantha Markle shared her views on the disgraceful mistreatment of Lady Susan Hussey and her thoughts on her sister’s forthcoming Netflix series. She tellingly observed: “As I watched the Netflix trailer, I felt as though I was watching a Neil Sedaka style music video about a couple who believe its them alone with the world against them at all the odds.”The mistreatment of Lady Susan Hussey that has followed the “racism storm” orchestrated by Ngozi Fulani’s decision to go public about something that should have been left private continues to dominate headlines. “Kiss Means War” declared ‘The Sun’ of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s “Netflix ambush” of the Prince and Princess of Wales’s US tour.Shared as screenshots by @lolamorrisons on Twitter an article from ‘The Sun’ that references how the late Queen tried to broker a “peace deal” provides further evidence of how mistreatment of others remains very much on the agenda of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex.On social media, mistreatment was also on the agenda as a result of the Netflix trailing airing. The @RestingDollface account mused of one image shared: “Someone please get OPRAH on the phone. She needs explain how THIS pace was ‘so small they couldn’t stand-up in it,’ because us cost-of-living struggling plebs don’t understand.”
'I couldn't find the way they treated the Royal Family or our family anywhere in the dictionary under "protection"'.
Samantha Markle, sister of the Duchess of Sussex, reacts to Prince Harry saying "I had to do everything to protect my family", in the Sussexes' Netflix trailer. pic.twitter.com/716dxG5oZ0
