The Steeple Times

Category: Deviants

Deviant

  • Tall Tales At The Telegraph – Newspaper Taken In By Yet More Lies From Ian Maxwell About That Infamous Bathtub Bonk

    Tall Tales At The Telegraph – Newspaper Taken In By Yet More Lies From Ian Maxwell About That Infamous Bathtub Bonk

    As ‘The Telegraph’ falls for tall tales from mucky madam Ghislaine Maxwell’s brother Ian Maxwell about Prince Andrew’s infamous “bathtub bonk” at her home, we remind readers of the truth about that standard sized tub

    “It’s the most peculiar photograph I’ve ever seen on a front page” raged Justin Webb on Radio 4’s Today programme this morning. Mr Webb, was referencing the day’s cover of The Telegraph and was talking of a story peddled to the rag-no-longer-a-readable paper by the nutty-not-nice Ian Maxwell, brother of the incarcerated noxious nonce Ghislaine Maxwell.

     

    Going further of this clear episode of an editor gone bonkers, Labour MP Chris Bryant asked on Twitter: “Is it 1st April? Was the whole editorial team on acid?” of an article by Robert Mendick and Victoria Ward that was titled: “The photo that ‘clears Duke [of York]’ over bath sex.”

     

    In said piece, the pontificating and pointless paper shared an image of two people sitting in the first-floor bathtub at Ghislaine Maxwell’s former home at 44 Kinnerton Street, Belgravia, London with images of Virginia Roberts Giuffre and Prince Andrew in place of their faces. Bizarre it most definitely was, but newsworthy it was not.

     

    If that was not weird enough, Mendick and Ward then chose to quote Ian Maxwell as if he were some kind of reliable source. The nutjob ranted:

     

    “I am releasing my photos now because the truth needs to come out. They show the truth that the bath is too small for any sort of sex frolicking.”

     

    “The whole of Virginia Giuffre’s case pivots upon a photograph taken more than 20 years ago at my sister’s former house in Kinnerton Street, in Belgravia.”

     

    “It proves nothing. Prince Andrew and my sister think it’s a fake, but I take the view that it’s irrelevant. It just shows that Prince Andrew had his arms around a girl who wanted a photograph, as she has said herself, ‘to show to her mother.’”

     

    “Ghislaine was in custody, and shortly after the picture was taken, the mews house was sold.”

     

    “[Giuffre’s] story relating to having had sex in the bath dates back many years, and the obvious time to put it to her that the bath is too small and makes sex impossible was at the trial. But Virginia Giuffre was never called to give evidence, and the photo never came to light.”

     

    “But her admission that her claim of having sex with Alan Dershowitz may be mistaken and therefore untrue, and given Prince Andrew is considering appealing the settlement, it seemed in the context of that the correct moment to release the images.”

     

    “Prince Andrew has been completely cancelled on the basis of the allegations…The truth really does need to come out. If this photo is helpful in achieving that, then that is what this is all about.”

     

    In January 2022, in a world exclusive subsequently picked up by the Daily Mail also, The Steeple Times revealed the first ever known photograph of the aforementioned bathroom and that this image showed this tub to be exactly what it is – full sized and thus perfectly capable of being a space in which two people could fool around and fornicate.

     

    Prior to this latest release of what should be condemned as nothing but fake news, on 25th January, Epstein victim lawyer Lisa Bloom tweeted of the matter:

     

    “So important. Prince Andrew’s reported new effort to worm out of the settlement he signed comes just as his buddy Ghislaine Maxwell says Virginia’s photo with Andrew is faked. But OTHER PHOTOS. And she looks like such a little girl in the photo on right. Because she was.”

     

    Editor’s Note – Unlike as is the case in many publications, this article was NOT sponsored or supported by a third-party.

     

    Pictured Top – ‘The Telegraph’s’ front page on Saturday 28th January and their soppy source, the swivel-eyed half-witted fruitcake Ian Maxwell; that this paper has been taken in by this nutcase is just further proof that this once respectable publication has well and truly gone to the dogs.

     

    Ghislaine Maxwell 44 Kinnerton Street bathtub
    When asked about what occurred on the night of 10th March 2001 in the first floor bathroom at her Kinnerton Street mews house, Ghislaine Maxwell responded: “[Virginia Roberts] then characterized [sic] things took place in my bathroom in the bathtub itself. The tub is too small for any kind of activity whatsoever.” The picture of that very same tub used in marketing material by Wellbelove Quested proves exactly to the contrary.
    Ghislaine Maxwell 44 Kinnerton Street layout
    The floor plan shared by the likes ‘The Daily Mail’ and ‘The Sun suggested the first-floor bathroom at the house to be 7-foot, 4 inches by 7-foot, 2-inches. Floor plans shared by estate agents Wellboved Quested suggested that the room is actually 8-foot, 4-inches by 8-foot, 2-inches. There was most definitely plenty of room for two…
    44 Kinnerton Street floorplan
    A floorplan of 44 Kinnerton Street, Belgravia. In it, mucky madam Ghislaine Maxwell’s home is clearly shown to be a place where ‘public’ entertaining took place on the ground floor, whilst ‘extracurricular’ activities took place on the upper two floors.
    44 Kinnerton Street banister
    These photographs of 44 Kinnerton Street, taken in July 2021, provide proof that the bannisters seen in the March 2001 photographs remain inside said property. The setting in which Prince Andrew and Virginia Roberts were captured was indeed most definitely genuine. In the same month, the new owners of the property displayed a poster at 44 Kinnerton Street for a festival that was to be held in East Anglia from 31st July 2021 to 1st August 2021. The event, the EA Festival, was hosted at Hedingham Castle – home to Jason and Demetra Lindsay – in Essex and had a line-up that included model and advocate Arizona Muse, film director Mike Figgis, ‘Countdown’s’ Susie Dent, sex commentator Rowan Pelling and comedian Josh Berry. The same open doorway also showed something else… The very same bannister that was shown in the photograph Prince Andrew, Virginia Robert and Ghislaine Maxwell appeared in.
    Matthew Steeples poll Kinnerton Street bath
    This morning on Twitter, Matthew Steeples asked: “Why is Ian Maxwell, brother of Ghislaine Maxwell, trying to make out that the bathtub at her former home at 44 Kinnerton Street, Belgravia too small for Prince Andrew & Virginia Roberts Giuffre to have had sex in? I proved it was of normal size last year.” The majority of respondents thus far have taken the view that “he’s working for Prince Andrew.”
    Prince Andrew nonce bathmat
    In November 2020, ‘The Steeple Times’ featured bathtub mats featuring Prince Andrew’s face and the caption “nonce” that were available for sale through Redbubble.com. Priced then at £23.61 ($32.30, €28.29 or درهم118.61), these 61cm by 43cm polyester microfiber items clearly proved very popular as they are no longer on the site. Clearly, there is a market for bathtub memorabilia that references the Queen’s supposed favourite son.

    THAT 2001 Photo Thus Far NOT PROVEN A FAKE – The 10th March 2001 photograph of Prince Andrew, Virginia Roberts and Ghislaine Maxwell

    The photograph, taken supposedly by Jeffrey Epstein on the first floor landing at 44 Kinnerton Street, Belgravia, London, SW1X 8ES, United Kingdom, has been shared by the world’s media in hundreds of thousands of articles and analysed countless times by countless experts.

     

    In November 2019, the Daily Mail’s Inderdeep Bains called it: “The photograph that WON’T go away” and it, as of date, has NEVER been discredited. Amongst evidence suggesting it to be perfectly real is that:

     

    • The setting of the photograph has been confirmed as genuine by the Maxwell family. Of it, in March 2021, Ian Maxwell told Radio 4’s Today programme: “I do recognise that setting.”
    • The window in the picture has the same features as the front first floor windows of 44 Kinnerton Street.
    • The width of the first floor landing is accurate to the measurements shown in the floor plan of the sales brochure prepared on the 14th October 2021 by estate agents Wellbelove Quested.
    • Though he claimed to be “at a loss to explain this particular photograph” during the 2019 BBC interview, the Duke of York has admitted to having visited 44 Kinnerton Street. He stated: “I don’t think I think ever went upstairs… The dining room and everything was on the ground floor.” Contradicting the royal, sources have claimed that the room behind him, Roberts and Maxwell in the photograph was used as a sitting room.
    • The heights of all three individuals in the picture look to be accurate proportionately.
    • Prince Andrew’s “chubby fingers” are clear to see. The Queen’s second son’s fingers are clearly “chubby fingers” and these very same “chubby fingers” have been seen hundreds of thousands of times in hundreds of thousands of other photographs.
    • Prince Andrew has claimed he only ever goes out in London in a suit and tie. Images of him in open necked shirts in the capital – including one of him leaving the nightclub Chinawhite – prove to the contrary.
    • Prince Andrew has claimed he does not “do” hugs and and embraces in photographs. Images of him taken in St Tropez embracing the US socialite Chris Von Aspen in July 2007 suggest the alleged non-sweater is wrong also on that score.
    • The outfit worn by Virginia Roberts – a woman who has already received financial settlements from Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell – has been seen on her in photographs of her at Naomi Campbell’s 2001 birthday party in France. In spite of some suggestions that a lady only wears an outfit once, we counter that a lady in Miss Roberts’ unfortunate situation would be forced to wear what she was told appealed to those in control of her wished her to wear.
    • Matthew Steeples of The Steeple Times and Shaun Attwood of Shaun Attwood’s True Crime Channel have both seen inside 44 Kinnerton Street and the stair rail shown in the photo remains in place and is thus genuine to the setting. Attwood subsequently released film footage of this on his YouTube channel and The Steeple Times shared its most recent image of the open front door with the stair rail beyond in July 2021.
    • Many experts have repeatedly stated photo manipulation was in its infancy at the time that this image first surfaced.
    • The FBI have never questioned the authenticity of the image.

     

    Twitter reacts to ‘The Telegraph’ being taken in by Ian Maxwell’s tall-tales…

    Chris Bryant tweet Prince Andrew bath

    The Names & Numbers – ‘Mucky Madam Ghislaine Maxwell’s Bathtub Bonk Pad’ – 44 Kinnerton Street, Belgravia, London, SW1X 8ES, United Kingdom

    10th March 2001 photograph Virginia Roberts Ghislaine Maxwell Prince Andrew Jeffrey Epstein analysis
    • 28th January 2023 – Valued at £2.317 million ($2.871 million, €2.641 million or درهم10.544 million) on TheMoveMarket.com, a sum 32.4% higher than the April 2021 sale price and a sum 503.4% higher than the January 1997 sale price.

     

    • 14th January 2022 – Property website TheMoveMarket.com values the house at £2.11 million ($2.88 million, €2.53 million or درهم59 million), a sum 19% lower than the current asking price for the unrenovated property.

     

    • January 2022 – Estate agents Wellbelove Quested offer the mews house for £2.6 million ($3.6 million, €3.1 million or درهم1 million), an extraordinary increase of 49% on the sale price just 270 days earlier. The house is offered on a lease of 127 years that commenced on 24th June 2014 and previously on their website Wellbelove Quested had marketed the house for a higher price of £2.75 million ($3.738 million, €3.283 million or درهم13.731 million).

     

    • July 2021 – The Steeple Times reports on repainting work to the outside of the house being underway. An open door reveals the infamous staircase bannister to still be in-situ.

     

    • 19th April 2021 – Records confirm the house to have been sold for £1.75 million ($2.39 million, €2.09 million or درهم79 million).

     

    • March 2021 – Ghislaine Maxwell’s lawyer offered cash from the “pending sale of her £1.45 million ($2 million, €1.74 million or درهم28 million)” home as part of a package when they sought bail for the mucky madam for a third time, the Daily Mail reported. This sum was 44% lower than the September 2020 asking price and 400% higher than the January 1997 purchase price.

     

    • March 2021 – A Knightsbridge estate agent told The Steeple Times: “Knowing the street as I do, 44 is one of the smaller houses which I assume it to be a little over 1,000 square foot in size. Depending on the condition, I estimate the freehold value to be circa £1.8 million to £2 million ($2.5 million to $2.7 million, €2.2 million to €2.4 million or 9درهم million to درهم10 million).”

     

    • December 2020 – Members of the Maxwell family attempted to raise finance on the property but are not successful, The Steeple Times learns from a financier with connections to the Maxwell family and their representatives. They were rejected, were rejected on the basis of the “toxicity” of their familial name.

     

    • September 2020 – Estate agents Aylesford list 44 Kinnerton Street for sale for £2.6 million ($3.6 million, €3.1 million or درهم1 million) on (it was claimed) a freehold basis, a sum 797% than the January 1997 purchase price. They subsequently later reduce the asking price to £2.1 million ($2.9 million, €2.5 million or درهم10.5 million) “according to a leading property expert.”

     

    • August 2019 – According to Insider, a woman with “long hair [who] appeared to be in her 60s” was seen entering the property. She “denied that the socialite owns or lived in the house, claiming instead that the elusive socialite lived elsewhere down the street.”

     

    • 10th March 2001 – Prince Andrew allegedly had sexual relations with 17-year-old Virginia Roberts in a bathroom in the property. He continues to deny this occurred whilst claiming that a photograph of himself with Miss Roberts and Ghislaine Maxwell on the first floor of building is a fake also.

     

    • 22nd January 1997 – Ghislaine Maxwell paid £290,000 ($396,000, €347,000 or درهم5 million) for the three-storey leasehold mews house. It is situated at the heart of the Duke of Westminster’s Grosvenor Estate.

     

    • 1989 to 1995 – Ghislaine Maxwell is known to have resided at 69 Stanhope Mews East, South Kensington, London, SW7 5QT. Her father bought it for her two years before his mysterious death and she reportedly “groomed and befriended Minor Victim 3 in London, England, between approximately 1994 and 1995… Maxwell introduced Minor Victim 3 to Epstein and during those interactions, Maxwell encouraged Minor Victim 3 to massage Epstein, knowing that Epstein would engage in sex acts with Minor Victim 3. During those massages, Epstein sexually abused Minor Victim 3” at that very property. It was sold for £267,000 ($365,000, €320,000 or درهم3 million) on 15th March 1995 and then again for £1.75 million ($2.39 million, €2.10 million or درهم8.77 million) on 30th August 2019.

     

  • I’m All Ears – Criminal Dale Poppleton (With Half-An-Ear Missing) Goes Viral On Social Media; ‘Earless Today, Earless Tomorrow’

    I’m All Ears – Criminal Dale Poppleton (With Half-An-Ear Missing) Goes Viral On Social Media; ‘Earless Today, Earless Tomorrow’

    Mugshot of half-an-earless criminal Dale Poppleton goes viral on social media; he’s got a look of Van Gogh meets Evander Holyfield, yet it’s still to be heard what his latest crimes actually are

    “Looking forward to Apple suing him for copyright infringement; he looks like the Apple logo” remarked one Twitter user after West Yorkshire Police shared a mugshot of a criminal named Dale Poppleton earlier this week. Another mused: “Looks like Mike Tyson had a bite out of his ear” whilst one responded: “I haven’t seen him round ear.”

     

    The image, which has unsurprisingly gone viral on social media channels including Facebook and Twitter, was accompanied by the caption: “Have you seen Dale Poppleton? Wanted in connection with a serious offence in Bradford, could be in the North of England,” but it was the press release that it linked to that truly amused.

     

    In it, the force shared a glaringly obvious observation about this 41-year-old individual. They ever so lackadaisically added: “[Mr Poppleton] is very distinctive due to the fact that he has half an ear (right side).”

     

    Going further of a 6’1” tall, half-an-earless man previously labelled an “accomplished criminal” in 2020 when “he was sentenced to three years and nine months in jail for burglary,” the MailOnline’s Matt Powell mused: “During the trial Bradford Crown Court heard how Poppleton had 19 previous convictions for 99 offences, many of them for matters of dishonesty.”

     

    Finishing their press release, West Yorkshire Police concluded:

     

    “He is thought to have connections to not only the Bradford area but the North of England. He was last seen in East Yorkshire. Extensive enquiries have been carried out to locate Poppleton but he is deliberately evading Police. Anyone who sees Poppleton is asked not to approach him.”

     

    The force failed to mention whether or not they are in possession of the missing piece from Poppleton’s ear. In 1997, after Mike Tyson bit off part of Evander Holyfield’s ear during a fight, the former later apologised. In 2013, speaking to The Sunday Times, Tyson remarked: “I see Evander every now and again. We actually did an ESPN commercial together, and I gave him his ear back in formaldehyde.”

     

    Editor’s Note – Unlike as is the case in many publications, this article was NOT sponsored or supported by a third-party.

     

    Twitter reacts to half-an-earless “what a boat race” Dale Poppleton… “This appeal will just fall on deaf ear(s). Once caught, give him an earful.”

    The worst ever ‘famous face’ mugshots…

    Jocelyn Wildenstein mugshot
    In December 2016, Swiss born ‘Bride of Wildenstein’ Jocelyn Wildenstein (née Périsset) got her claws out and stuck them into her on-off lover Lloyd Klein at her apartment in Trump Tower, New York. She was arrested “after gouging her boyfriend’s face with her nails and stabbing him twice in the chest with her scissors.” She subsequently appeared in court later in the day charged with felony assault charges in the second degree and ‘The Steeple Times’ later reported: “She [was] accused of inflicting injuries with a weapon against 49-year old Canadian couturier Lloyd Klein and allegedly poured hot wax over him, ‘went for his face with her nails’ and ‘grabbed some scissors and stabbed them twice into his chest.’ The cat-like woman is to said to have been provoked into the violent frenzy after Klein allegedly failed to ‘pay her enough attention’ after an evening meal, according to an unnamed source who spoke with the ‘MailOnline.’”
    Jeremy Meeks Chloe Green
    ‘Hot mugshot guy’ Jeremy Meeks went viral on social media after people claimed the image taken after his July 2014 arrest was suggested to be “showing his smouldering model good looks.” This violent criminal got two Hollywood agents, given deals with big brands and subsequently got engaged to and had a brat with the repugnant ratbag Sir Philip Green’s fat pudding of a daughter. The couple unsurprisingly subsequently split up and whilst Meeks lived-it-up with other women, Chloe Green got herself up-the-duff by another geezer. Classy.
    Jeffrey Epstein mugshot
    Since croaked paedophile Jeffrey Epstein didn’t show anyone contrition when snapped after his arrest on 6th July 2019 by the FBI-NYPD Crimes Against Children Task Force at Teterboro Airport in New Jeresey on sex trafficking charges.

    The worst ever ‘non-famous face’ mugshots…

  • Scobie’s Scuttled – Has Meghan Markle Ditched Boring Blabber Omid Scobie?

    Scobie’s Scuttled – Has Meghan Markle Ditched Boring Blabber Omid Scobie?

    Has the Duchess of Sussex ditched boring blabber Omid Scobie and will his forthcoming ‘book’ just prove to be another bag of bilge?

    Just as it has been revealed that Virginia Roberts Giuffre – the woman who received a sum estimated as anything upto £9.7 million ($12 million, €11 million or درهم44.1 million) from a man she never met if you believe his narrative, Prince Andrew – is about to pen her memoirs, a very boring blabber is preparing to blab yet again also.

     

    Currently, Omid Scobie is doing the rounds (or what what he prefers to bombastically term “the beat”) talking about his forthcoming tittle-tattling tome which is to be titled Endgame. The sequel to the bag of bilge that was Finding Freedom will be published on 1st August and though this sapless spiv is clearly beginning early on his pontificating, promotional rounds, what is clear is that he has likely been scuttled by his puppet mistress, the currently ‘missing,’ mendacious menace formerly known as Meghan Markle.

     

    In comments to the self-declared “polymath” Micheal Timilehin Omoniyi yesterday shared in a 0:34-minute video clip released on Twitter whilst wearing a baseball cap, Scobie whined:

     

    “[The Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s] mere existence, their mere story has raised issues about misogyny within the institution and the monarchy; about unconscious bias and racism. And I know how Harry called it ‘unconscious bias,’ but I’m still going to call it racism because I think that it is only not racist when it’s unconscious. The second someone makes it conscious to you and you try and minimise it or skirt the topic or ‘recollections may vary’ it, that is racism… Even me saying that makes people feel uncomfortable.”

     

    Speaking in September 2021, the British-Persian ‘journalist’ and boring blabber had described his last known encounter with the duke and duchess as involving a “big farewell hug.” Going further, at that time, he cringeworthily claimed: “Meghan told him: ‘It didn’t have to be this way.’ I think she wanted to share that last moment because it is a moment in history, but also to do it in an environment she felt safe in.”

     

    Tellingly of the twaddle he’s subsequently peddled, the dimwitted dunce added in comments reported in The Independent: “He said he doesn’t ‘even know if the Sussexes like me, to be honest,’ adding that ‘press is press.’”

     

    Updating the situation on Tuesday, the Daily Express’s Emma Crabtree turned to Prince Harry “accusing Scobie of writing ‘utter nonsense’ about Meghan’s fake kidnapping” and “lying” about a story he included in Finding Freedom about a “staged kidnapping.”

     

    Commenting on this in the article, GB News host Dan Wootton “accused Scobie of being a sycophant to the shunned Sussexes by calling him a ‘hagiographer’ and slammed the authoritative tone of the royal commentator.”

     

    Wootton added: “It all sounds very dramatic doesn’t it, and very authoritative from oddball Scobie… I would say to Scobie, don’t take it personally, after all Harry’s book was a pack of lies too.”

     

    Meanwhile elsewhere yesterday, The Steeple Times was sent a ‘mindmap’ illustrating the links between the alleged ‘yacht girl’ that is the Duchess of Sussex and Prince Andrew and Harvey Weinstein. A fascinating illustration which we share below, this document was first published on a site named Project Fangirl on 18th November 2022, but where it could go further would be to add in names such as Ghislaine Maxwell, Markus Anderson, Piers Morgan and Scobie himself even. Here, yet again, is proof that the world of ‘MeGain’ is nothing but a murky, mucky mess and one that petulant pillock Prince Harry should never have got himself involved in.

     

    Editor’s Note – Unlike as is the case in many publications, this article was NOT sponsored or supported by a third-party.

     

    Pictured Top – A rather startled Omid Scobie (left) and his puppet mistress the Duchess of Sussex (right) with her allegedly gay ‘bestie’ Markus Anderson.

     

    Meghan Markle Harvey Weinstein Prince Andrew Mindmap
    The ‘mindmap’ detailing the links between the Duchess of Sussex and Harvey Weinstein is a fascinating one and includes the likes of Larry King, Amol Rajan, Rachael Ray, Lindsay Roth and Sunshine Sachs. There is, however, much more to this and many more noxious names deserve to be added; amongst them Markus Anderson, Ghislaine Maxwell and Omid Scobie.
    Omid Scobie plastic not fantastic
    Omid Scobie is most definitely plastic and not fantastic, but how long will he last without his puppet mistress giving him permission to lie on her behalf? Perhaps, in the coming months, this definite ‘melt’ will just melt away and then we can all say: “Good bloody riddance.”
    House of York Houses of Paedophiles
    The House of York and the Houses of Paedophiles – In 2006, the pugnacious paedophiles Harvey Weinstein, Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell partied at Windsor Castle with the Duke of York, his ex-wife Sarah, Duchess of York and their two daughters Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie. Did nobody think to do a test on the guest list for criminal perverts? Clearly not.
    Harvey Weinstein Sarah Duchess of York
    On 19th December 2016, the dimwitted dunce Sarah, Duchess of York attended a “VIP screening” of ‘Lion’ hosted by Harvey Weinstein and Georgina Chapman at Soho House in London. Whether Markus Anderson arranged this event is unknown, but the former Meghan Markle’s mate Princess Eugenie of York most definitely showed up also.
    Oprah Winfrey Harvey Weinstein
    The friendship between Oprah Winfrey – a regular on the roster of spinners for the Duke and Duchess of Sussex and their deviancy – and Harvey Weinstein cannot be shown to be anything but clear. This picture proves how much the former clearly adored the latter now jailed sex offender.
    Tweet 1
    Omid Scobie has been called out by his old chum’s husband Prince Harry as nothing but a muckspreading teller of untruths. His answer? “Surprise.”
    Tweet 2
    Scobie claims to be “stuck in a fever dream” for now; likely soon, this washed-up wazzock will just be a forgotten syllable in a chapter that the royal family would actually rather just forever forget.
  • Where Is Meghan Markle? Where Has The Meddling Menace Duchess of Sussex Vanished To?

    Where Is Meghan Markle? Where Has The Meddling Menace Duchess of Sussex Vanished To?

    Where has the never-normally-far-from-the-limelight meddling menace formerly known as Meghan Markle vanished to?

    A woman known normally for displaying more front than Harrods, the deviant diva that is the Duchess of Sussex has literally vanished off the face of the planet. Normally, as she has repeatedly said in the past “always moving together,” the fact that the “like salt and pepper” duo that are her and her hapless husband have not been seen together in weeks is telling.

     

    Said by some to be allowing Prince Harry his own space to promote his tittle-tattling tome Spare, ‘Moaning Meg’ is likely, given the flooding that devastated the surrounding area recently, not at her £14 million Montecito mansion.

     

    Instead, this hard-faced harridan, it has been claimed, could have returned to her old chums from her Suits days in Canada or possibly headed to Washington to begin what she supposedly desires most next – a career in politics. As Prince Harry once said: “What Meghan wants, Meghan gets” and a frontline role in the Democratic Party is very much on her tick list.

     

    For this former actress, this move would likely, however, come too soon. Presently, even the once loathed and detested Queen Consort, Camilla, is more popular than her in America – with an official poll ranking the former -13 and the latter -8.

     

    Aside from facing upto and settling a lawsuit from her far more sensible sister, Samantha Markle, it might be better for this deranged duchess to do something else. It is time for this alleged former ‘yacht girl’ to Prince Andrew to head off to Siberia and if they’re not divorcing – as some have predicted – she ought to take her seriously stupid sidekick with her; ‘MeGain’ ought to get gone and simply never come back.

     

    Editor’s Note – Unlike as is the case in many publications, this article was NOT sponsored or supported by a third-party.

     

    What’s the truth about the stories that abound about the Duchess of Sussex?

    • In November 2021, the duchess was forced to apologise to the Appeal Court in London for making a misleading statement in her privacy case against The Mail on Sunday’s publishers.
    • Her very own father, Thomas, has called out her many untruths about him and others again, again and again.
    • Of her claiming having got married the day before she actually did, Mr Markle stated: “Lying about the archbishop? How can you say: ‘We’ve been married three days before we got married’? Her lies are so obvious, I don’t know why she says them.”
    • Her very own half-sister, Samantha Markle, who is currently bringing a defamation case against her, has called her out as a liar on multiple occasions also. It has been proven that the duchess’s claim that she hasn’t seen her sibling in over 20 years was untrue given a photo of the pair together 14 years ago proves quite to the contrary.
    • Her very own half-brother, Thomas Jr., said of her: “I told Prince Harry, I think she’s going to ruin your life. She’s very shallow… She’s a phony, a bully, a jaded, shallow, conceited woman.”
    • The wife of Prince Harry has been called out on multiple occasions for spinning stories against other members of the royal family, most especially the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge.
    • Staff who’ve worked for her have complained that she is a bully and investigations into this remain ongoing.
    • The Duchess of Sussex is a known manipulator of the press and paparazzis and it has been claimed that she’ll “twist the truth” to get any headline she wants.
    • Questions remain as to how many times she’s actually been married in total. Some say twice, some say thrice.
    • What’s the truth about Meghan’s mother Doria Ragland? Is this clearly equally manipulative woman an honest and decent citizen or is she a jailbird who has spent time in the clink?
    • Did the ‘Montecito Meddler’ meet Prince Andrew or Prince Harry first? Rumours abound that she could have spent time and holidayed with the former as long ago as 2001 and that her claim to have no prior knowledge of the royal family until 2016 is just utter baloney.
    • “Would you trust this woman with a bargepole?” is something often asked of this money motivated minx.

     

    Markus Anderson Duke and Duchess of Sussex
    Could the Duchess of Sussex be with her allegedly gay ‘bestie’ Markus Anderson? The Soho House employee is always close to anything murky that is going on with this mendacious minx and he’s undoubtedly the first person she turns to with any problem.
    Omid Scobie
    Could the wicked wench formerly known as Meghan Markle be with her ever-willing to say anything she tells him PR peddler Omid Scobie? Prince Harry has made out that ‘Finding Freedom’ included clear lies in recent days whilst promoting ‘Spare’ and in response Scobie has clearly begun to turn on his masters. In comments, reported on in the ‘Daily Express,’ the ‘author’ remarked: “In many ways, how can a regular person not have Sussex fatigue at this point? I almost feel it’s like my duty to follow it every step of the way, but I can understand how general members of the public have just had enough of hearing about the royal dramas in general. I sympathise with the Sussexes in some ways, because they’re only now getting to join the story at this very late stage. For many years, they weren’t able to share their side. They watched others try and tell versions of it or they sat back and watched things reported about them that they didn’t agree with or didn’t feel were a fair representation of themselves. So now they’ve come in with their versions of events, with their stories and are filling in the gaps that we didn’t know about. But of course, it comes after years and years of coverage. So, I think people are starting to get a little tired of the story in general.”
    Doria Ragland
    Could the deranged diva Duchess of Sussex and her mouthy mother Doria Ragland be hiding out in Canada or could she be spinning herself into the world of politics in Washington even? The truth is always stranger than fiction with ‘MeGain’ and God only knows what this psycho will do next.
  • How The Mighty Fall… Grubby Groper Ghislaine Maxwell To Slum It In TV Interview With Sickening Shock Jock Jeremy Kyle

    How The Mighty Fall… Grubby Groper Ghislaine Maxwell To Slum It In TV Interview With Sickening Shock Jock Jeremy Kyle

    As it is announced Ghislaine Maxwell is to be interviewed by Jeremy Kyle, one is left asking: “Is this part of the mucky madam sex offender’s calculating strategy as she seeks an appeal?”

    A Manchester district judge, Alan Berg, once branded The Jeremy Kyle Show a “human form of bear-baiting.” He went further and suggested “it seems to be me that its whole purpose is to effect a morbid and depressing display of dysfunctional people who are in some kind of turmoil” and now its former host is about to engage with someone far worse.

     

    That person? On Monday, Kyle returns to our screens with an interview with the imprisoned noxious nonce Ghislaine Maxwell. In a way, one can suppose, this wicked woman can be surmised an ideal ‘subject,’ but equally one is left questioning how someone who once hung out with presidents and princes has now denigrated herself to such a low-level.

     

    Aired on some 3,000 occasions on ITV between 2005 and 2019, the now deservedly cancelled “dark and dangerous” The Jeremy Kyle Show show featured a braying assembly of hoodlums on a set where guests simply had to be as obnoxious as possible. Kyle, the now 57-year-old son of a personal secretary to the late Queen Mother, egged them on, whilst the studio audience jeered and jostled to join in with what can only be described as a “sh*tshow” of car crash proportions.

     

    Almost anything went on what was also unsurprisingly called out as “the vilest show on the planet.” Aside from lie detectors and DNA and paternity tests, Kyle and his security guards presided over a gathering of what can only be described as the detritous of humanity, but what he will be enquiring of the monstrous menace that is Ghislaine Maxwell has yet to be properly revealed.

     

    Whilst The Jeremy Kyle Show’s supposedly “most hated guest ever,” Dwayne Davison of Nottingham, subsequently claimed participating to have been “the worst thing that has ever happened in my life” and that it had “ruined” his life, Maxwell is clearly banking on trying to get the public she previously treated like the ‘great unwashed’ on her side. We already know this convicted criminal to be cold and calculating, but what benefit she and her and her advisors think will come of this will most certainly be deserving of analysis post-showing.

     

    According to the MailOnline’s chief reporter Martin Robinson, the host – whose ITV show was axed after a guest took his own life following a lie detector test – will use the TalkTV interview on the Rupert Murdoch owned channel to “lift the lid on Epstein, Prince Andrew and even our late Queen.” In an announcement, Kyle added: “This is Ghislaine Maxwell behind bars and in her own words.” He does not, however, add mention of whether he’s got a lie detector or a dose of pontificating PR peddler Brian Basham to go with that.

     

    Editor’s Note – Unlike as is the case in many publications, this article was NOT sponsored or supported by a third-party.

     

    Pictured Top – Jeremy Kyle liked to use “double lie detectors” on his show (right); boob bagger Ghislaine Maxwell is in need of being subjected to such as it might force her to admit the truth; she should also finally show some decency and name the names of those she so disgustingly sex trafficked her many, many victims to.

     

    On Saturday morning on Twitter, Matthew Steeples asked: “Is mucky madam sex fiend Ghislaine Maxwell illustrating intelligent strategy by going on Talk TV on Monday with shock jock Jeremy Kyle?” He asked followers to vote as to whether this is a “calculating and clever move” or whether this showed “she’s mental and delusional.” A further two options offered were that this represents a move by her “PR peddlers spinning away” and a suggestion that “she’s being fed to the wolves” to keep those powerful people she associated with – such as Bill Clinton, Donald Trump and Prince Andrew – from having to answer questions. After all, here is a wicked wastrel woman who was convicted of sex trafficking her victims, but here is a case where no one has been convicted of ‘receiving’ these very victims.
    Prison
    How the mighty fall… Ghislaine Maxwell was first incarcerated after being arrested in Bradford, New Hampshire on 2nd July 2020. Kept at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn, New York prior to her trial, the wicked wench is now serving her sentence at FCI Tallahassee in Florida. It is from there that she conducted the interview with Jeremy Kyle that will air on TalkTV on Monday 23rd January 2023.
    The Jeremy Kyle Show
    “My daughter accused me of stealing and then said she slept with my fiancé!” was a typical staged encounter that occurred on the ITV show. Surely even the audacious pension pot plunderer Robert Maxwell wouldn’t have ever lowered himself to appear on such a show, yet his definitely deviant daughter has clearly decided that lowering herself to such a level might actually be a strategy that could help her win over the court of public opinion. Is she deranged or is there method in her madness?
    Ghislaine Maxwell Piers Morgan
    The main host on TalkTV is Piers Morgan. Pictured here with Ghislaine Maxwell at a launch party for Geordie Greig’s ‘Breakfast with Lucien’ book on 21st October 2013 at a private residence in New York, Morgan now regularly gets called out for having appeared in a number of photographs with the convicted sex offender but continues to claim that he did not actually know her well.
    Ghislaine Maxwell Rupert Murdoch
    Equally, illustrating another link to TalkTV, the ‘Bouncing Czech’s’ grubby groper daughter was happily snapped with the channel’s owner, Rupert Murdoch, at the fifth ‘Important Dinner for Women’ in New York on 20th September 2010. In spite of the intense rivalry between Rupert Murdoch and Robert Maxwell in the years prior to the latter’s death, it is clear that the feud between the two newspapers barons did not continue beyond the grave and that friendly relations developed between Ghislaine Maxwell and the House of Murdoch subsequently.
    Royal Ascot
    How the mighty fall… In times happier, Ghislaine Maxwell was able to live it up at Royal Ascot with her mate and alleged lover Prince Andrew (left); Piers Morgan meanwhile has been known to turn up there also with Jeremy Kyle also (right).
    Living it up parties Mick Jagger Donald Trump
    How the mighty fall… In times happier, Ghislaine Maxwell lived it up at parties at palaces and counted Mick Jagger (left) and Donald Trump (right) amongst her social circle. Her and her fat and fearsome father cultivated power and privilege, but that she has now lowered herself to the base of humanity and Jeremy Kyle speaks volumes as to the fact that she’s now a bottom feeding slurry tank dweller.
    Innocence
    Yesterday’s ‘MailOnline’ article about the forthcoming interview concluded with a remark from the mucky madam’s “spokesman.” One can only presume this to have been either Brian Basham (most likely) or either her brother Kevin Maxwell or her former British based PR peddler Ross Gow, but that they say: “Her spirits are holding up as you might expect of an innocent woman” simply shows how delusional this deranged woman and those around her truly are.
    Satan
    Jeremy Kyle once said: “Some people will always think I’ve got the eyes of Satan. Others will think I’m a TV God. People have the right to criticise.” Many will say that his forthcoming subject has, like her monstrous father, the eyes of Satan also and many will also criticise his television interview with Jeffrey Epstein’s lover turned girl procurer.
  • UnAppealing Ghislaine – Will Wicked Wench Ghislaine Maxwell Succeed At Appeal?

    UnAppealing Ghislaine – Will Wicked Wench Ghislaine Maxwell Succeed At Appeal?

    As mucky madam Ghislaine Maxwell gets a new appeal lawyer in spite of owing a fortune to her previous representatives, journalist Daphne Barak PR peddles for her after posing for pictures with the feckless fool that is the ultimate grifter, Sarah, Duchess of York

    It must be noted that scum tends to inevitably float to the top of any pond and that birds of a feather tend to stick together. Examples of such came last week with revelations that Ghislaine Maxwell is now being represented by the pugnacious paedophile Harvey Weinstein’s lawyer and that a PR peddler named Daphne Barak is about to share a new interview with the noxious nonce in the coming days.

     

    Whilst Barak – whom also posed for snaps with she who has never confirmed if she repaid loans taken from the croaked paedophile Jeffrey Epstein, Sarah, Duchess of York last month – was this morning given acreage to promote her ‘interview’ with her old chum of many years in both The Sun on Sunday and The Mail on Sunday, it was Page Six that revealed that Maxwell was becoming “jailbirds of a feather” with her old chum Weinstein after taking on attorney Arthur L. Aidala.

     

    Maxwell (AKA prisoner 02879-509), who is now laughably also supposedly currently teaching “etiquette lessons” in the clink if the Independent is to be believed, still owes a sum estimated at £3 million ($3.7 million, €3.4 million or درهم13.5 million) to lawyers previously hired by her, her brother Kevin and her estranged husband Scott Borgerson.

     

    Editor’s Note – Unlike as is the case in many publications, this article was NOT sponsored or supported by a third-party.

     

    Pictured Top – Ghislaine Maxwell with Jeffrey Epstein sat outside a cabin at Balmoral during a visit their when they supposedly met the late Queen even – if Daphne Barak is to be believed. Of this, Barak shares that Maxwell has now declared: “The Queen was one of the most exceptional women I ever had the honour and privilege of meeting.” The convicted sex trafficker added that the monarch had a “sparkle” in her eyes and declared she was “profoundly sorry” to learn of her death last year.

     

    Harvey Weinstein Jeffrey Epstein Ghislaine Maxwell
    Birds of a rotten feather… The gruesome trio of paedophiles that was Harvey Weinstein, Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell pictured at a party given by he who paid a sum alleged to be as high as £12 million to a woman he claimed he never met, Prince Andrew, at Windsor Castle in 2006.
    Alan Dershowitz Arthur L Aidala
    Arthur L. Aidala is very much of the publicity hungry school of lawyers. Aside from Harvey Weinstein, his firm, Aidala, Bertuna & Kamins, has also represented other mates of Ghislaine Maxwell including Alan Dershowitz. In documents submitted this week, he claimed: “[Maxwell] was malnourished… And yet she’s supposed to sit for a trial [with her] life on the life… In the United States of America, anyone who’s accused of any crime should not be abused by the US government the way she was abused… She did not get a fair trial… The judge ignored the many claims of malnourishment, living with vermin in her cell, lack of sleep, and overall deplorable conditions. There were also issues regarding lack of access to her lawyers. This is all in violation of her fundamental constitutional rights and will be powerfully brought to the attention of the appellate courts.” Of how he came to be involved with the mucky madam and her family, scions of a pension pot plundering tyrant, Aidala added: “After her sentencing… her trial team was done representing her and her family quite frankly reached out to us. Obviously we’d been in the headlines with Mr Weinstein’s case.”
    Arthur Aidala Harvey Weinstein
    Scotch drinking “Arthur cancels ‘cancel culture’” Aidala – pictured with Harvey Weinstein – was described in a July 2022 article in ‘The New York Times’ as “camera-ready” and “a lawyer who welcomes press attention.” Amongst this registered Democrat’s previous clients are the accused “socialite granny shover” Lauren Pazienza, the crossdressing oddity Rudolph W. Giuliani, cleared “killer crane rigger” William Rapetti, “daddy’s penis chopper-offer” Brigitte Harris and “boyfriend stabber” John Pickett. Of him, Alan Dershowitz tellingly remarked: “Arthur is the new me.”
    Daphne Barak Sarah Duchess of York Hillary Clinton
    Daphne Barak pictured in December with Sarah, Duchess of York and with Hillary Clinton – whom she references her as having “hosted” and “supported the presidential bid” of. Here is a ‘journalist’ whose close connections clearly muddy her mind when it comes to interviewing her subjects. Why didn’t this ‘journalist’ ask mucky madam Maxwell about ‘Killary’s’ husband taking at least 27 flights on Jeffrey Epstein’s ‘Lolita Express’ and his convicted sex trafficker co-collaborator attending Chelsea Clinton’s wedding? Curious that; very curious indeed.
  • Fly Me, I’m Mendacious Meg! Prince Harry Proven To Have Lied

    Fly Me, I’m Mendacious Meg! Prince Harry Proven To Have Lied

    Air New Zealand call out Prince Harry’s lies about bookings to fly Thomas Markle and again illustrate that him and ‘Mendacious Meg’ find the truth highly inconvenient

    Sir Frederick Laker was the original budget airline man. Though his Skytrain project went bust in 1982 owing the equivalent of £818 million ($1 billion, €923 million or درهم3.7 billion) today, this bonkers businessman with a “common touch” was never one to “creep away with his tail between his legs.”

     

    Whilst also Sir Freddie admitted this his “devotion to his work possibly short-changed all his wives,” another frequent flyer with a problematic wife – though generally himself prone to using land of olive oil production loving Sir Elton John’s private jets rather than anything as common as Easyjet – named the Duke of Sussex has been called out after telling ‘porky pies’ about booking flights with Air New Zealand in his tittle-tattling tome Spare.

     

    Responding to claims in the book that the former Meghan Markle’s now husband had booked first-class flights to bring her father, Thomas, to Britain from Mexico, the airline yesterday tweeted: “Introducing #SussexClass. Apparently, coming soon.”

     

    Air New Zealand later added that it has never operated flights between Mexico and the United Kingdom and equally confirmed, that they do not offer a first-class service. Speaking to the New Zealand Herald, a spokesperson for the firm very clearly added: “We’ve never had flights between Mexico and the UK. And we only have Business Premier.”

     

    Responding on social media, members of the Twitterati then understandably piled on – with one writing: “Any spare seats, anyone?”

     

    Editor’s Note – Unlike as is the case in many publications, this article was NOT sponsored or supported by a third-party.

     

    Air New Zealand Prince Harry tweet
    The tweet in question has well and truly made yet another mockery of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex.
    Freddie Laker 1
    Sir Freddie Laker’s remarkable life story was immortalised in a book by Roger Eglin and Berry Ritchie in 1980.
    Freddie Laker 2
    Here was a frequent flyer who was a lot more fun than the noxious nuisances that are the Duke and Duchess of Sussex.
    Royal-Arrivals
    Described as a “Russian oligarch kind of jet,” the Bombardier Global 6000 aircraft that the couple returned to California on from Farnborough in June 2022 emitted nearly 60 tonnes of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. Of this, the ‘Daily Mail’ stated: “Under the terms of the Paris Agreement objective of keeping global warming below 2C, each person’s carbon budget should be no more than 2.1 tonnes per year – meaning Harry and Meghan exceeded this by nearly 15 times in just one flight. As the Sussexes also flew into Britain on a private jet, and assuming it was the same aircraft, their overall return trip would have exceeded the annual limit by nearly 30 times. By comparison, the carbon emission rating of flying from Heathrow to LA in an economy-class seat on a commercial aircraft is 1.4 tonnes, according to climate consultancy Cube6.” They added: “The Queen’s grandson previously described climate change as one of the ‘most pressing issues we are facing’, and told Oprah Winfrey during the couple’s bombshell interview last year: ‘We need to do better about stopping or allowing the things that are causing so much harm to so many of us at the source, rather than being distracted by the symptom.’”
    Royals-Arrivals-2
    In September 2019, it was reported that since marrying the alleged former “yacht girl” Meghan Markle, the now King Charles III’s second son is said to have used private plans for six out of ten flights despite claiming to travel commercial 99% of the time. Here is a condescending couple who tell others what to do and then who themselves go and do the exact opposite without shame or explanation.
    The pathetic attention seeking son of the late Diana, Princess of Wales has previously claimed that his decision to use private aircraft is because he is determined to “keep his family safe.” Clearly immune to the fact that the vast majority of the public who fly commercial are perfectly safe, here is a brat who clearly has no conception of how hypocritical he and his sordid sidekick truly are.

    Twitter reacts to Air New Zealand’s tweet…

  • Did Prince Harry Have To Share Details About His “Todger”?

    Did Prince Harry Have To Share Details About His “Todger”?

    Matthew Steeples suggests Prince Harry’s revolting revelations about his “todger” to be inappropriate given he moved to the US to become a more “private” person

    It has become clearer and clearer in recent days that Prince Harry doesn’t understand the concept of “public” and “private.” Whilst this renegade royal moved to America in 2016 as he and his wicked wastrel wife supposedly didn’t want to be “public” anymore, their inability to remain “private” in the time since is proof that here are a mendacious pair of meddlers with no concept that with “rights” come “responsibilities.”

     

    Turning to another “private member” mentioned in his memoirs Spare – of which every single member of the public I’ve spoken with since their release has responded with words to the effect of: “Please SPARE us anymore from that drip” – this morning, the Daily Mail’s Richard Eden shared a retweet that included a clip of the Duke of Sussex reading aloud from his tittle-tattling tome.

     

    In his tweet – captioned “Have a listen to this clip, if you dare… #PrinceHarry #Spare #royal” – Eden tellingly selected a tweet by a former Penguin Random House book editor named Dominic Wakeford.

     

    In that tweet, Wakeford – whose former employers, of course, are the publishers of Spare – wrote: “This book is a Freudian nightmare.” The tweet has, to date, been shared some 5,000 times and liked by over 56,000 accounts and in it, a 0:33-second clip read by King Charles III’s second son is included.

     

    Prince Harry shockingly shares:

     

    “My penis was oscillating between extremely sensitive and borderline traumatised. The last place I wanted to be was Frostnipistan.”

     

    “I’d been trying some home remedies including one recommended by a friend. She’d urged me to apply Elizabeth Arden cream. ‘My mum used that on her lips. You want me to put that on my todger?’ ‘It works Harry, trust me.’”

     

    “I found the tube and the minute I opened it, the smell transported me through time. It felt as if though my mother was right there in the room and I took a smidge and applied it down there.”

     

    Responding, one member of the Twitterati observed: “He’s thinking of his mother as he applies the cream to his nether regions. My God, he really is a tuppence short of a shilling and what bright spark thought this was worthy of inclusion? I’m certain Harry expected the sympathy vote, but he comes across as stark raving mad!”

     

    Another added of the former Meghan Markle’s puppet’s product placement attempt: “For years, Elizabeth Arden has been my trusty companion. I can never feel the same about it EVER again. I mean, I knew it was a cure, but…”

     

    Editor’s Note – Unlike as is the case in many publications, this article was NOT sponsored or supported by a third-party.

     

    Pictured Top – The world has reacted to the Duke of Sussex’s first ‘book’ by mocking him mercilessly. Aside from mocking him up as a “colossal tit,” this randy royal’s raging romps have been shot down by booksellers also. In Swindon, a “cheeky” retailer named Bert’s Books displayed ‘Spare’ next to a copy of Bella Mackie’s ‘How To Kill Your Family” in what Sky News termed a “light-hearted nod to his allegations against the royal family.”

     

    Gay allegations, girl beating allegations
    Prior to getting it on with the mendacious menace then known as Meghan Markle – a wicked wastrel woman whom may have been married twice or maybe even three times – the second son of the late Diana, Princess of Wales was quite happy to fool around in all sorts of ways – some more curious than others. Whether Elizabeth Arden creams were involved remains unknown.
    Emails
    Elsewhere this morning on social media emails sent ‘Ginge and Cringe’ have been doing the rounds. In one of them came yet again further proof that these rotten ratbag royals DID cooperate with Omid Scobie and Carolyn Durand for their – like ‘Spare’ now also – bargain basement bag-of-bilge book about their avaricious antics. It is time now for Omid Scobie to be called out for what he truly is; here is not an independent minded author but here instead is a pointless puppet controlled PR peddler answerable to only woman – the mendacious menace formerly known as Meghan Markle.
    Rape allegations
    Another popular royal commentary account on Twitter going by the name ‘FawnOverMeGain’ went further and shared allegations about the Duke of Sussex on Tuesday. Whilst we very clearly point out that these allegations are completely unsubstantiated as of the present moment, that the tempestuous royal is accused of “making Prince Andrew look like a saint” is most definitely notable.

    The Twitterati reacts to the Duke of Sussex sharing a sickening story about his “private member” (and a pugnacious plug for Elizabeth Arden’s cosmetic products)…

  • Pen Farthing v Pugnacious Prince Harry’s ‘Privates’

    Pen Farthing v Pugnacious Prince Harry’s ‘Privates’

    As Prince Harry literally shows himself as a complete prick by going on about his privates, Royal Marines commando turned acclaimed animal rescuer Pen Farthing slams him over animal suffering in Kabul

    As the public ponders pugnacious Prince Harry’s ‘privates’ given his pointless prattling about his not-so-significant anything but private ‘member,’ former British Marines commando turned Nowzad Dogs charity founder Pen Farthing took to Twitter to share that the Duchess of Sussex’s drippy appendage’s antics have forced him out of Kabul.

     

    In a series of tweets and comments, Farthing, a war hero and author of the best-selling One Dog at a Time, observed:

     

    “We now have to deal with Taliban officials directly in every aspect of daily life here. We were trying to put what happened here behind us. We don’t need former soldiers bragging about numbers they killed, especially as it was all for nothing.”

     

    “People were killed for no reason. I was a royalist until today. Prince Harry should have thought through the security implications for those of us still in Afghanistan trying to bring about some good.”

     

    “It would be pretty difficult to get yourself out of any trouble you found yourself in here today, because there is no support. I just hope the Taliban don’t decide to make any examples of the ex-military they can get to.”

     

    In other missives, both before and after his departure, he added:

     

    “He never protected me at any point in my career thank you. And I have not targeted him. I have merely said he has been badly advised and puts former mil like me in quite a position as I am sat in Kabul… and THANK YOU for your support.”

     

    “Because the Taliban are now the ones in power & their measured response was the Taliban he killed had families & every media outlet in the world is promoting it… Which now makes ex-forces a potential target for a revenge attack especially those on their own with no protection.”

     

    “Well I was a Royalist until today…. Cheers #PrinceHarry You have been very badly advised I would probably say. And glad you thought through the security implications of those of us still out in #Afghanistan trying to bring about some good. #idiot #notmyprince.”

     

    “To the idiots who made dumbass comments in support of #PrinceHarry in my tweet below, know I have had to evac from #Kabul tonight in case of potential reprisal attacks on ex-forces people like me in the wake of his badly judged memoir… The animals suffer not me. You happy?”

     

    Whilst a few responded by coming out in support of Prince Harry’s ridiculous ramblings, the majority joined Farthing in condemning the disgrace that is now very much King Charles’s estranged second son.

     

    Amongst responses about this “traitor” were comments that included: “He’s a disgrace to the nation,” “he’s a bell end,” and a suggestion that “[he’s] put a target on the whole country’s back and the royal family” also. “He needs serious help,” one very sensible person finally concluded.

     

    Elsewhere, the Daily Mail’s Richard Eden shared another very relevant piece of news about the already bargain-basement bucket book. He tweeted: “If you think Prince Harry’s claims in his memoirs are shocking, imagine what he left out! His and Meghan’s cheerleader Omid Scobie says lawyers at the publisher Penguin Random House sent back FORTY-ONE pages of questions after Harry’s ghostwriter submitted a final draft.”

     

    Editor’s Note – Unlike as is the case in many publications, this article was NOT sponsored or supported by a third-party.

     

    Pictured Top – A war hero who now devotes his life to saving animals in conflict zones (left) and a pointless prick who spends his days profiteering and taking the dime of Netflix, Penguin Random House and Spotify (right).

     

    Duke of Sussex
    Prince Harry has banged on about how he went to America to seek a more private life. In the time since he arrived there, all he has actually done instead is seek out copious amounts of publicity and sought, along with his money motivated, mendacious menace of a wife, to profiteer and drag the names of the royal and Markle families into the quagmire. Shame on him.
    Duchess of Sussex
    Surely by now, even the wicked wench formerly known as Meghan Markle must realise that her stupid strategy to have become a royal without understanding that with rights comes responsibilities has well and truly backfired. This ‘Modern Day Mrs Simpson’ should be sent to Siberia as the disgraceful, disreputable pariah that she undoubtedly is and she should take her dodgy drip of a sidekick with her.

    Twitter responds to Pen Farthing’s comments…

  • Down The Rancid Rabbit Hole – Ghislaine Maxwell Saga Widens

    Down The Rancid Rabbit Hole – Ghislaine Maxwell Saga Widens

    A year on from her conviction, the rabbit hole that is the story of Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein and their victims widens with new lawsuits on the horizon and new troubles for Prince Andrew also

    As someone named Niki Watkins once crooned: “If you think it’s all over, then the joke is on you” and a year on from her conviction, the saga of Ghislaine Maxwell and her wicked associates continues to deliver up new twists and turns that prove that this is a saga that is far from over.

     

    In a 30-minute podcast, released on New Year’s Eve by Law & Crime, attorneys Sigrid McCawley and Kenya Davis reflected on “recent developments” and claimed that “a new Empire State law could change the course of the investigation in 2023.”

     

    Of this, Law & Crime’s Adam Klasfeld reported:

     

    “Known as the Adult Survivors Act, the statute temporarily suspends the statute of limitations on historic sexual abuse claims. The statute is similar to and broadens the reach of another New York law called the Child Victims Act, which focused on the sexual abuse of minors specifically.”

     

    Addressing the matter that sends the Twitterati into a tizzy on a daily basis as to no other accused co-conspirator of Maxwell having been charged, McCawley – who has represented a number of Epstein’s victims including Annie Farmer – declared: “I think the lesson and legacy of the Ghislaine Maxwell case is that nobody is above the law in the United States.”

     

    Going further, Davis added: “I think you will see a ramp-up pretty, pretty quickly, especially after the start of the year” with “more docket activity soon.”

     

    With the U.S. Virgin Islands also having sued JPMorgan and Deutsche Bank over their alleged enabling of the croaked paedophile Epstein – with dates now set for the 7th August and 5th September respectively – and Maxwell facing a 23rd January deadline herself to cough up some names if she wants to even get close to the prospect of her sentence being reduced, now is a time when things will start to heat up in this most curious of cases.

     

    Whilst Donald Trump “wished her well, whatever that may mean” in times past of his old mucker Maxwell, he may well now be hoping she does something completely different. The 45th POTUS and Bill Clinton and Prince Andrew and others will most definitely prefer ‘The Bouncing Czech’s’ deviant daughter continues down the path of solemn silence.

     

    Elsewhere on 30th December, the New York Post reported that Virginia Roberts Giuffre has now claimed that a defamation suit filed against her by Rina Oh, a lover of the dead paedophile Epstein during the early 2000s, is “a sham.” Ms Oh, whom admitted she had “brought at least three women to Epstein” in 2020, had filed a £8.4 million ($10 million, €9.5 million or درهم36.7 million) suit last January after Giuffre publicly named her as “one of Epstein’s recruiters” on Twitter.

     

    At the time, this now 39-year-old lady who also received a sum estimated as high as £10.1 million ($12 million, €11.3 million or درهم44.1 million) from Prince Andrew in spite of him claiming he’d never met her, claimed Oh’s interview had “retraumatised” her. Oh had revealed she had taken the “then-teenage Giuffre to buy a school girl outfit to please the rich financier – justifying the outing by saying ‘17 to me is not a child’” and also stands accused of “cutting and slashing her as part of the sadomasochist abuse for Epstein’s pleasure.”

     

    Editor’s Note – Unlike as is the case in many publications, this article was NOT sponsored or supported by a third-party.

     

    Virginia Roberts Giuffre Rina Oh Jeffrey Epstein Jacques Pepin
    Rina Oh now lauds herself as “producing art therapy with children” and an “longtime advocate of healthy eating for children” but also has been accused of doing far worse things to youngsters by Virginia Roberts Giuffre. Ms Oh is quite proud of her work with children, chefs and restaurateurs like Jacques Pépin (pictured far right) and Dave Arnold and even has a blog named ‘Dining With Out-Laws.’ She is far quieter about her time as the supposed girlfriend of Jeffrey Epstein.
    Prince Andrew Virginia Roberts Giuffre Ghislaine Maxwell Kinnerton Street
    Rina Oh – according to the podcast ‘The Recruiters: Broken: Seeking Justice’ – has suggested the 10th March 2001 photograph of Ghislaine Maxwell, Prince Andrew and Virginia Roberts at 44 Kinnerton Street, Belgravia, London to be a “composite” and not genuine. Ms Oh has produced paintings herself of Jeffrey Epstein as Bacchus, Ghislaine Maxwell “nude in The Garden of Sin (like Eve)” and also sketched images of the pension pot plunderer Robert Maxwell also; her husband, Vincent Amen, was a “a former Michael Jackson employee who was named as one of five alleged unindicted co-conspirators in the late star’s unsuccessful 2005 molestation trial. Mr Amen denied the allegations.” Michael Thomas, a New Zealand photographer, who photographed the original 10th March 2001 image in 2011 responded: “As I have said before, it was just an ordinary photo you would have got from a chemist in the days of negatives. Surely, if it was fake, every media outlet in the world would be getting sued for using it. The fact that isn’t happening, to me says everything… It wasn’t like [Roberts Giuffre] pulled the photo of Prince Andrew out, it was just in among the rest of them. They were just typical teenage snaps. There’s no way that photo is fake.”
    Peter Mandelson Prince Andrew
    For Prince Andrew (pictured here with mutual Epstein and Maxwell chum Peter Mandelson), aside from being turfed out of Buckingham Palace by his elder brother as the year begins, life could take a turn for the worse on another front. The gagging order agreed to when the late Queen’s second son agreed to pay a sum estimated between £3 million and £10 million to Virginia Roberts Giuffre comes to an end in February. After that time, Ms Giuffre will be free to write about the matter and give interviews; her commentary could prove yet another bombshell given what she’s previously said of ‘Randy Andy’ and others.
    Peter Mandelson Jeffrey Epstein Valdson Viera Cotrin
    Lord Mandelson ‘living-it-up’ with Jeffrey Epstein in the presence of the latter’s butler, Valdson Viera Cotrin, at the £10 million Parisian paedo pad owned by the Ponzi scheming sex fiend circa 20th January 2007. That the Labour peer – whose name 10 numbers attributed features in the Epstein-Maxwell ‘black book’ – was willing to celebrate the financier’s birthday with him is shocking – especially given it was widely by then known that Epstein had been charged with sex crimes in August 2006. The key ‘classic question’ Lord Mandelson now needs to answer is a paraphrasing of that put to decidedly dippy Debbie McGee by the late Caroline Ahern (in her role as the bonkers but brilliant ‘Mrs Merton’) in 1997: “What, first, Peter, was it that attracted you to the multi-millionaire Jeffrey Epstein?”
    Jeffrey Epstein Harvey Weinstein Ghislaine Maxwell
    Meanwhile now, though Maxwell will go down in history alongside her wicked sex offenders including Harvey Weinstein and Jeffrey Epstein, outrage remains that not a single one of those she sex trafficked her victims to has been brought to justice.
    Kevin Spacey Ghislaine Maxwell
    Shockingly, in spite of being due to appear in court in the UK this month on sexual assault charges, Kevin Spacey (pictured partying in Buckingham Palace with Ghislaine Maxwell), is to play President Franjo Tudjman in a 90-minute film titled ‘Once Upon A Time in Croatia.’ Director Jakov Sedlar justified giving Spacey the role and claimed “[he] is absolutely innocent” in comments to ‘The Times’ yesterday.
    Ghislaine Maxwell Scott Borgerson
    Facing troubles on other fronts… Notorious for fakery as well as for being a convicted sex offender and noxious nonce, Ghislaine Maxwell (AKA ‘Mrs Scott Borgerson’ as well ‘Jen Marshall’ and ‘Janet Marshall’; now known just as prisoner 02879-509) faces troubles on the home front. Whilst it is known that Mr Borgerson ended his relationship with Maxwell prior to her December 2021 trial by telephone, it is not known if they have yet divorced. Miss Maxwell transferred some £15 million to her husband since circa 2015 or 2016 and currently the sum owed to lawyers is an estimated £3 million plus. The prospects for the mucky madam now being able to afford to appeal her sentence thus looks more and more unlikely.