Category: Audacity

Malignant Meghan Markle Expose (Part II) – Shaun Attwood & Matthew Steeples
Second part of interview with Matthew Steeples by Shaun Attwood about the former Meghan Markle watched over 25,000 times in 24 hours since it aired after first part is watched 160,000 times; Steeples again condemns hapless Prince Harry and his malignant menace wife

Having attracted 159,000 views for the first part of what has been titled Meghan Markle Expose: Part I, Matthew Steeples, editor-in-chief of The Steeple Times, returned to the small screen on Monday for Meghan Markle Expose: Part II with a 1:19:30-minute interview with the popular podcaster Shaun Attwood.

Aired on YouTube, the segment followed-up on topics discussed in the first part, but moved the narrative along to what might happen at King Charles III’s coronation on 6^th May 2023.

Amongst topics discussed were:
- Will or will not the Duke and Duchess of Sussex attend the coronation of King Charles on 6th May given the fallout from Spare?
- If they do attend, what might their roles at that event be given they, like Prince Andrew, are no longer “working royals”?
- What will be the situation if they do show-up, given the offensive comments they’ve made about amongst others the Queen Consort and the Prince and Princess of Wales?
- What is the story behind the $10 million donation to Archewell and who is the mystery donor?
- Could the truth of that donation relate more to tax affairs than to charitable motives?
- What are the most recent developments in the case of Markle v Markle? Will the Duke and Duchess of Sussex be forced into handing over documentation from the Oprah interview and information about Finding Freedom and Spare?
- What is the situation in the court case of Broughty v Boozy? Are the wheels falling off for Christopher Boozy after his Netflix appearance for Meghan and Harry?
- What year was Meghan born? Was she born 4th August 1981 and is thus 41 or is she actually as old as 45?
- Was Meghan a bully at college and was there a ‘hazing’ incident in which she allegedly glued the eyelashes of another girl whilst at Northwestern University, Chicago in the early 2000s?
- Was the then Meghan Markle a “wild child” in those university years and prior and not little Miss Innocent campaigner as she now claims? “Burger King binger”, fake IDs, wild parties.
- Why does Meghan associate with alleged bullies like Ellen DeGeneres given the proven “toxic workplace culture” that was proven when 10 former employees made accusations and 3 executives were made to leave?
- Are Meghan and Harry being shunned by the powerful famous people they once coveted or are they just choosing to keep under the radar until the coronation is dealt with?
- What is the truth of Meghan suggesting the Princess of Wales “was not a hugger” after the embrace with her ex-history teacher?
- Does Prince Harry deserve criticism over the way Saha Walpole – the “awkward sex in a field” lady – was not told that he’d be writing about her in his book Spare?
- Does the situation that follow illustrate that Prince Harry is just selfish and inconsiderate?
- Does it show that he puts his personal profile and personal profit above all else?
Over 400 comments have already been received in response to the aired episode and amongst them were remarks including: “Thank you for getting the truth out there. This is what people need to listen to” and “Matthew is correct; so many don’t want to see them at the coronation.”

Going further, Brian Pollard added: “A possible resolution: Andrew and Harry should make a formal public apology and may then be allowed to attend the coronation (seated marginally). Meghan Markle should stay home” whilst Jonathan Bach concluded: “Can you imagine that heifer showing her radioactive smile at the coronation? The whole world would jointly throw-up.”

Elsewhere yesterday on the UK Royal Reels channel in a 3:41-minute feature, the first part of Meghan Markle Expose was given a worthy mention. In a feature titled: “Spot on!” the channel examined, the channel commended the interview with the presenter observing: “Steeples brought reliable news about Meghan to the interview… Steeples did not hold back on airing his thoughts. He goes through many theories about Meghan’s recent disappearance.” It can be watched below.

Editor’s Note – Unlike as is the case in many publications, this article was NOT sponsored or supported by a third-party. Follow Matthew Steeples on Twitter at @M_Steeples.

Follow Shaun Attwood on Twitter at @shaunattwood.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vhm03O7dizI&t=4s

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-4tycbbMCCs&list=PLPT_cCpNMvT50d_7cJ55ciKoZEY8q_YPt&index=11&t=0s

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yhWasaQEqaw

Should the Duke & Duchess of Sussex private jet it in to attend the coronation of King Charles III on 6th May 2023 in the UK? #MeghanMarkle #Meghan #PrinceHarry #KingCharles #Coronation #MeghanAndHarryAreFinished #MeghanMarkleisToxic #HarryisaBackstabbingLiar #HarryandMeghan
— Matthew Steeples (@M_Steeples) February 15, 2023

What’s the truth about the stories that abound about the Duchess of Sussex?
- In November 2021, the duchess was forced to apologise to the Appeal Court in London for making a misleading statement in her privacy case against The Mail on Sunday’s publishers.
- Her very own father, Thomas, has called out her many untruths about him and others again, again and again.
- Of her claiming having got married the day before she actually did, Mr Markle stated: “Lying about the archbishop? How can you say: ‘We’ve been married three days before we got married’? Her lies are so obvious, I don’t know why she says them.”
- Her very own half-sister, Samantha Markle, who is currently bringing a defamation case against her, has called her out as a liar on multiple occasions also. It has been proven that the duchess’s claim that she hasn’t seen her sibling in over 20 years was untrue given a photo of the pair together 14 years ago proves quite to the contrary.
- Her very own half-brother, Thomas Jr., said of her: “I told Prince Harry, I think she’s going to ruin your life. She’s very shallow… She’s a phony, a bully, a jaded, shallow, conceited woman.”
- The wife of Prince Harry has been called out on multiple occasions for spinning stories against other members of the royal family, most especially the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge.
- Staff who’ve worked for her have complained that she is a bully and investigations into this remain ongoing.
- The Duchess of Sussex is a known manipulator of the press and paparazzis and it has been claimed that she’ll “twist the truth” to get any headline she wants.
- Questions remain as to how many times she’s actually been married in total. Some say twice, some say thrice.
- What’s the truth about Meghan’s mother Doria Ragland? Is this clearly equally manipulative woman an honest and decent citizen or is she a jailbird who has spent time in the clink?
- Did the ‘Montecito Meddler’ meet Prince Andrew or Prince Harry first? Rumours abound that she could have spent time and holidayed with the former as long ago as 2001 and that her claim to have no prior knowledge of the royal family until 2016 is just utter baloney.
- “Would you trust this woman with a bargepole?” is something often asked of this money motivated minx.
Shaun Attwood interviewed Matthew Steeples on Sunday 12th February 2023 and first aired that interview on Monday 13th February 2023 at 7pm GMT on his YouTube.

In the discussion, Steeples returned to the subject of how the Duke of Sussex remains under the thumb of his wife. He reminded viewers of the prince’s words: “What Meghan wants, Meghan gets” and illustrated the narcissistic tendencies of the Duchess of Sussex in detail.

It must be remembered that the wicked woman formerly known as Meghan Markle claimed she knew nothing about the royal family before she met her now husband; this photograph of her in her youth outside Buckingham Palace in London proves quite to the contrary.

For a couple who left for the sake of “privacy,” suggested Matthew Steeples, here are a pair who’ve done an awful lot of “publicity.” With the coronation on the horizon, we wait with baited breath to see what trouble that the malignant meddler Meghan and her drip of a husband will resort to next. “Shame on the pair of them!” concludes Steeples.
February 15, 2023
‘Screwing’ With Ghislaine – Moaning Mucky Madam Ghislaine Maxwell Complains About Abuse In New Prison

Noxious nonce Ghislaine Maxwell complains that prison guards are “screwing” with her; she should be reminded she was the one who has been convicted after “screwing” her victims

Ghislaine Maxwell (AKA ‘prisoner 02879-509’) used to enjoy ‘screwing’ the young girls that she used to pick up to sex traffic to Jeffrey Epstein and her other creepy cronies. Now, the worm has turned and this noxious nonce is allegedly getting a ‘screwing’ by prison guards at FCI Tallahassee, the supposedly “cushy country club-esque” prison where she deservedly will rot for the rest of her twenty-year sentence.

Yesterday in the DailyMail.com, Daniel Bates shared a supposed “exclusive” in which a “prison consultancy company” founder named Holli Coulman told him that guards are “not easy” on Maxwell and that she has been forced to “keep close to her pod mates.”

Going further, Coulman, the founder of Pink Lady Consultants and a woman “who has a number of clients serving time inside the same prison,” added:

“She rarely associates out of that group. I am told that the guards like screwing with her by shining their lights at night, clanging their keys and talking really loud and derogatory at her. I know that the guards at night are not easy on her when they come by her bunk and check that she’s there.”

“They don’t like her because of her entitled attitude. I’m sure it’s something she can’t change as she has a different demeanor than let’s say an inmate serving time for drugs. Her upbringing was upper class.”

Clearly not content with buckling down and getting on with her sentence silently, mucky madam Maxwell has not stopped moaning since her arrest on 2^nd July 2020 in Bradford, New Hampshire.

Showing a temper akin to that of her poisonous pension pot plundering papa in August 2021, Jeffrey Epstein and Prince Andrew’s supposedly shared one-time lover barricaded herself in the video conferencing room of the Metropolitan Detention Center with a cart load of documents and subsequently got banned from using said cart.

Earlier, in April that year, the mendacious madam’s family complained she was being deprived of sleep, her hair was falling out and that she “was being treated worse than Hannibal Lecter.” The Metropolitan Detention Center responded to these clear falsehoods by declaring: “[We have] not observed the defendant experience any noticeable hair loss… Most recently, when the defendant was weighed last week, her weight was 137.5 pounds… [Maxwell wears an eye mask and] regularly sleeps through night-time wellness checks.”

In the time since, “boob groper” Maxwell has had her PR peddlers out complaining also. In May 2022, Ian Maxwell bleated: “There are nasty Internet trolls out there continuing the lynch mob against her… [Her] once-close friends have only disowned her because of cancel culture” whilst quite rightly, at sentencing in June 2023, United States attorney Damian Williams observed:

“Ghislaine Maxwell sexually exploited young girls for years. It is difficult to overstate the magnitude of her crimes and the harm she caused… The lenient sentence the defendant seeks would send the message that there is one system of laws for the rich and powerful, and another set for everyone else.”

“Maxwell was an adult who made her own choices… If anything stands out from the defendant’s sentencing submission, it is her complete failure to address her offense conduct and her utter lack of remorse. Instead of showing even a hint of acceptance of responsibility, the defendant makes a desperate attempt to cast blame wherever else she can.”

“Moreover, even now, at sentencing, the defendant has shown no acceptance of responsibility, and her submission fails to even mention, much less accept responsibility for, the harm she has caused her victims. Instead, her entire submission is an effort to cast herself as a victim: of her father, of Epstein, of the media, of prosecutors, of the Bureau of Prisons.”

Illustrating further that the ‘bestie’ of Prince Andrew had no concept of accepting what she had done and that all that this “remorseless” woman ever does is moan and groan, Williams added:

“At bottom, the defendant’s complaints about jail seem to come down to the vast gulf between the conditions of her confinement and the defendant’s lived experience up until her arrest and detention on July 2, 2020.”

“Until July 2020, the defendant spent her entire life living in extraordinary luxury. Her childhood and adolescence were filled with wealth and privilege. That access to wealth continued into adulthood when the defendant found a benefactor in Epstein, who provided her with millions of dollars and invited her to share in his luxurious lifestyle of mansions, house staff, private chefs, and private planes.”

“After leaving that relationship, the defendant remained exceptionally wealthy, residing in palatial estates and owning multiple homes. It is no wonder, then, that she found jail jarring. Going from being waited on hand and foot to incarceration is undoubtedly a shocking and unpleasant experience.”

“The massive difference between the defendant’s prior life and the life of an inmate may feel extreme to the defendant, but when compared to the experiences of other pretrial detainees in this District, her experience is by no means so shocking as to merit a downward variance.”

“If anything, the defendant’s privilege remained intact while at the MDC, as demonstrated by the exceptional benefits she received. No other inmate received the kind of access to discovery and to counsel that the defendant did. The defendant had her own shower, her own television, her own desktop computer, her own laptop, and her own space to spend the day outside of her cell.”

“The defendant was able to get any concerns, no matter how small, immediately brought to the attention of MDC legal counsel through her attorneys. Comparing that treatment to SAMS is out of touch with reality.”

“In many respects, the defendant’s conditions of confinement were preferential and more beneficial than those experienced by other inmates… At bottom, the defendant does not like jail.”

“… Finally, it bears emphasizing that the defendant has told blatant lies about her conditions of confinement. She repeatedly claims to have suffered significant hair loss, but anyone who has seen the defendant in court can easily see that is not true.”

“She repeatedly claims to have lost an extreme amount of weight, but, as noted above, BOP medical records make clear that she has not. The defendant is perfectly healthy, with a full head of hair.”

“The investigation uncovered that the defendant committed terrible crimes, and that is what this case is about. The Court should see the defendant’s attack on the Government’s motives for exactly what it is: a desperate attempt to shift the blame for her own crimes and distract from the gravity of her offense conduct.”

Editor’s Note – Unlike as is the case in many publications, this article was NOT sponsored or supported by a third-party.

Pictured Top – Ghislaine Maxwell liked ‘screwing’ around with the FBI and when caught had ludicrously wrapped her mobile phone in tinfoil (the trick, by the way does not work); in happier times she lived-it-up drinking Krug and fine wines with the likes of Mick Jagger; those days for this wicked wastrel woman are long gone and she now gets the punishment she deserves instead.

Moaning Maxwell and her soppy siblings have regularly suggested her conditions to be akin to those of Hannibal Lecter. Sadly for her, there’s no Chianti let alone Krug on tap.

That this paedophile groomer was recently allowed to go on Jeremy Kyle’s TalkTV television show – courtesy of assistance from her PR peddler Daphne Barak and no doubt her old mate Rupert Murdoch, the channel’s owner – is frankly outrageous. It is not this evil monster that deserves a voice; it is, instead, her victims.

The Privileges The Pension Pot Plunderer’s Deviant Daughter Once Enjoyed…

Fast cars… In June 2019, in her last known public appearance, lived it up with Pink Floyd drummer Nick Mason’s wife by driving from London to Monte Carlo in the Cash & Rocket ‘charity’ car rally. Ironically, the rally was meant to raise funds for victims of sex trafficking; a great pity that the organiser, Julie Brangstrup, clearly was someone who didn’t bother with due diligence and allowed a woman who’d already paid compensation to one of the victims of her sex trafficking activities to participate alongside Paris Hilton and Caroline Stanbury.

Private planes… No more jetting around will be possible for Jeffrey Epstein’s enabler until at least 17th July 2037 as this is grubby groper Ghislaine Maxwell’s earliest possible parole date. Instead, the only private jets she’ll see are the ones flying over FCI Tallahassee as she jogs around the jail’s running track.

Floating gin palaces… Enya’s song ‘Orinoco Flow’ playing on her radio – if she opts to buy one off the prison commissary list – is about as close as this deviant will get to sailing away also. Meanwhile, the yacht that her daddy Robert Maxwell ‘fell’ off on 5th November 1991 was rebranded as ‘Lady Mona K (1993 to 2018) and has since been ‘Dancing Hare’ since 2018. It is ironically owned by the ex-wife of the disgraced media baron’s rival and now counts Anna Murdoch Mann as its mistress.

The ‘Privileges’ The Convicted Sex Offender Has Had Since Being Incarcerated…

On Twitter in April 2021, crusading author of ‘Ghislaine Maxwell: An Unauthorized Biography’ Kirby Sommers illustrated how privileged Jeffrey Epstein’s sidekick’s pre-trial prison conditions were. Whilst most prisoners make do with a bucket and gruel, the mucky madam had access to “perks in jail” that included both a desktop and laptop computer from which she can send and receive emails, had a television and a telephone in her cell and a private bathroom also. She was the sole inmate on the second floor of the jail, was fully vaccinated against COVID-19 and was allowed more time to communicate with her legal representatives than other inmates. Talk about a hard life!

February 11, 2023
Meddling Meghan Markle Expose – Attwood, Hopkins & Steeples
Expose interview with Matthew Steeples by Shaun Attwood and Jennifer Hopkins about the former Meghan Markle watched over 73,000 times in 16 hours since it aired; Steeples condemns hapless Prince Harry and his meddling menace wife

Over 73,000 viewers have watched a 1:10:24-minute interview with Shaun Attwood, Jennifer Hopkins and Matthew Steeples on YouTube since it aired at 7pm GMT last night.

Shared also in shorter segments that have been watched thousands of times also and titled ‘Meghan Markle Expose’ by Atwood to his 756,000 subscribers, the feature was a deep delve into many matters about the meddling menace Duchess of Sussex, her birth family and the family she married into.

Covering the ongoing saga of ‘Missing Meghan’ – who subsequently emerged from her two month ‘disappearing act’ a day after the interview was filmed last Friday to attend a bit of a bash with the alleged bully Ellen DeGeneres – Steeples did not hold back on airing his thoughts and condemned the Archewell Foundation having given just 23% of the donations it has received as “an utter disgrace.”

Turning to Prince Harry’s friendship circle, Steeples called out the way in which this rotten royal has ditched those that he grew up with and moved into a world of “me, me and me” with his wife. “With rights come responsibilities,” he argued before going through issues such as the alleged 10-year disappearance of Meghan’s mother Doria Ragland, the ex-Suits actress changing religion and the clear lies told about the date of her 2018 marriage.

Editor’s Note – Unlike as is the case in many publications, this article was NOT sponsored or supported by a third-party. Follow Matthew Steeples on Twitter at @M_Steeples.

Follow Shaun Attwood on Twitter at @shaunattwood and Jennifer Hopkins on Instagram at @jenhopkins88.

Pictured Top – The Duchess of Sussex hits the headlines daily and in spite of her disappearing act – which may or may not have involved the billionaire Gordon Getty – this meddling isn’t helping matters with her antics; pictured right with a clearly displeased Theresa May.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-4tycbbMCCs&t=4s

What’s the truth about the stories that abound about the Duchess of Sussex?
- In November 2021, the duchess was forced to apologise to the Appeal Court in London for making a misleading statement in her privacy case against The Mail on Sunday’s publishers.
- Her very own father, Thomas, has called out her many untruths about him and others again, again and again.
- Of her claiming having got married the day before she actually did, Mr Markle stated: “Lying about the archbishop? How can you say: ‘We’ve been married three days before we got married’? Her lies are so obvious, I don’t know why she says them.”
- Her very own half-sister, Samantha Markle, who is currently bringing a defamation case against her, has called her out as a liar on multiple occasions also. It has been proven that the duchess’s claim that she hasn’t seen her sibling in over 20 years was untrue given a photo of the pair together 14 years ago proves quite to the contrary.
- Her very own half-brother, Thomas Jr., said of her: “I told Prince Harry, I think she’s going to ruin your life. She’s very shallow… She’s a phony, a bully, a jaded, shallow, conceited woman.”
- The wife of Prince Harry has been called out on multiple occasions for spinning stories against other members of the royal family, most especially the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge.
- Staff who’ve worked for her have complained that she is a bully and investigations into this remain ongoing.
- The Duchess of Sussex is a known manipulator of the press and paparazzis and it has been claimed that she’ll “twist the truth” to get any headline she wants.
- Questions remain as to how many times she’s actually been married in total. Some say twice, some say thrice.
- What’s the truth about Meghan’s mother Doria Ragland? Is this clearly equally manipulative woman an honest and decent citizen or is she a jailbird who has spent time in the clink?
- Did the ‘Montecito Meddler’ meet Prince Andrew or Prince Harry first? Rumours abound that she could have spent time and holidayed with the former as long ago as 2001 and that her claim to have no prior knowledge of the royal family until 2016 is just utter baloney.
- “Would you trust this woman with a bargepole?” is something often asked of this money motivated minx.
Matthew Steeples, Shaun Attwood and Jennifer Hopkins chatted about all matters ‘MeGain’ on Friday 4th February 2023.

The Duke of Sussex has most definitely ended up pretty much on the floor and an international laughing stock after launching his tittle-tattling tome ‘Spare.’ His wicked wastrel wife meanwhile seems to have moved onto pastures new and appears to be attempting to forge ahead with her own projects with considerably richer billionaires.

Could it be curtains for this condescending couple’s marriage in the coming weeks or months?
February 7, 2023
Binned Barrymore – Michael Barrymore Insults Memory Of Murder Victim Stuart Lubbock

In pretentiously posing for pictures as-if-dead, utter berk Michael Barrymore yet again insults the victim of murder at his Essex bungalow Stuart Lubbock; this rotten ratbag should be binned

After yet again illustrating himself as an utter shameless scumbag last August when he shared letters from the late Diana, Princess of Wales, Michael Barrymore has yet again proven himself an utter cretin by filming himself posing as if dead and throwing himself into a bin.

Shared on TikTok, the footage of this feckless fool is nothing but an insult to the victim of the poor father of two murdered at his home on 31^st March 2001, Stuart Lubbock.

Responding online, respected journalist Alexis Parr condemned the footage as “weird” whilst others suggested “Michael’s lost it again” might come to be the analysis of this reprehensible ratbag best known for rolling around on the floor off his skull with the convicted racist Marie-Claire, Baroness von Alvensleben.

Shame on Michael Barrymore; may he be forevermore cancelled.

Editor’s Note – Unlike as is the case in many publications, this article was NOT sponsored or supported by a third-party.

Justice for Stuart Lubbock – The people who need to man-up and tell the truth about what happened at Michael Barrymore’s home on 31^st March 2001

Michael Parker (AKA Michael Barrymore) – Allegedly loudly said: “I need a f**k” in a taxi as he left the Millennium Nightclub to return to his home, the scene of the death of Stuart Lubbock. Barrymore later lied to a coroner’s court about facilitating drug taking at his house on the night in question also.

Barrymore claimed to have been first to have discovered the body of Stuart Lubbock at 5.45am, called his manager Mike Brown before the ambulance arrived and then left the premises. He admits that was “wrong” and also bizarrely told Piers Morgan that in spite of “knowing others were hiding secrets about what happened to Mr. Lubbock” that “I am not going to say their names. I just hope they are brave enough to come forward one day.”

Mike Brown – Agent of Michael Barrymore. Called to the property before emergency services arrived.

Kelly Campbell – Had met Michael Barrymore for the first time on the night of the incident. Claimed not to have been aware of what happened.

James Futters (sometimes spelt ‘Futers’) – A paper boy turned chef. Described as “a local from the village” and a “friend and neighbour of Barrymore.” Claimed to have been the first to discover the body with Simon Shaw and stated: “[It was not] Michael Barrymore and not Jonathan Kenney [who found him].” Later, of him the Evening Standard reported: “Barrymore offered James Futters a white powder on his finger saying: ‘Do you want to try this?’ Mr Futters told the inquest that he leaned forward and licked the powder.”

Claire Jones – Then aged 17. Had met Michael Barrymore for the first time on the night of the incident. Claimed not to have been aware of what happened but told the police that she “saw Barrymore rummaging through drawers and changing his clothes before police arrived. When he left the house, he had a ‘bundle of material’ under his arm,” according to the Evening Standard. “She added: ‘Jonathan (Kenney) was rushing through the bungalow before the ambulance and police arrived. I got the impression he was hiding something.’”

Jonathan Kenney – Estate agent, drag queen and Michael Barrymore’s then lover; later arrested on suspicion of murder but never charged; known for having a “record of violence.” Claimed to have been the first to have discovered the body and is now aged 50.

Justin Merritt – A dustman from Essex. Later arrested on suspicion of murder but never charged. Later paid £30,000 by the News of the World for an interview in which he stated Barrymore had “rubbed cocaine on Stuart Lubbock’s lips shortly before he died.”

Kylie Merritt – Sister of Justin Merritt. She also alleged Barrymore “rubbed cocaine on Stuart Lubbock’s lips shortly before he died” (curiously in the wake of her brother selling his account of the night).

Simon Shaw – Described as “a local from the village.” Michael Barrymore supposedly “ran off” to Mr. Shaw’s house to “buy himself thinking time [for two hours] before he was questioned by the police [at 7.49am].”

In addition, others, who’ve never been identified could also have possibly been present. If they were, they should come forward or be named by those listed above.

The disgraced entertainer pictured ‘worshiping’ Sir Jimmy Savile in the ‘Celebrity Big Brother’ house in January 2006. Of the late paedophile, at the time, the self-centred ex ‘Strike It Lucky’ host disgustingly declared: “When he came in I was blown away because it’s him and he never lets you down. I didn’t think seeing Jim and hearing Jim talking and being so personal and kind to me. I started to well up in there and thought here we go.”

The scene of the rape and murder of Stuart Lubbock on 31st March 2001: Michael Barrymore’s then home, 4 Beaumont Park Drive, Roydon, Harlow, Essex, CM19 5HB. The property was most recently sold for £1.33 million in 2017 whilst Barrymore had paid £392,500 for it in 1998 and was forced to sell it for £802,000 in 2005 to cover costs related to his bankruptcy.

The eight people who went to party on 31st March 2001 who didn’t die. Why won’t any of them tell the truth and why has one of them changed his name?

Jonathan Kenney – a now 51-year-old – was the ‘entertainer’s’ lover at the time of the killing. He is now said to be a coach driver, resides supposedly in Cheshire and has most curiously changed his name. One is left wondering why.

Michael Barrymore disgustingly pretending to be Hitler (left) and victim of rape and murder at his home, Stuart Lubbock (right).

Michael Barrymore pictured rolling around on the floor off-his-skull with the convicted racist bigot Marie-Claire, Baroness von Alvensleben.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=3&v=-1wRAvqXOos&embeds_euri=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.thesteepletimes.com%2F&source_ve_path=MzY4NDI&feature=emb_logo

January 31, 2023
Tall Tales At The Telegraph – Newspaper Taken In By Yet More Lies From Ian Maxwell About That Infamous Bathtub Bonk
As ‘The Telegraph’ falls for tall tales from mucky madam Ghislaine Maxwell’s brother Ian Maxwell about Prince Andrew’s infamous “bathtub bonk” at her home, we remind readers of the truth about that standard sized tub

“It’s the most peculiar photograph I’ve ever seen on a front page” raged Justin Webb on Radio 4’s Today programme this morning. Mr Webb, was referencing the day’s cover of The Telegraph and was talking of a story peddled to the rag-no-longer-a-readable paper by the nutty-not-nice Ian Maxwell, brother of the incarcerated noxious nonce Ghislaine Maxwell.

Going further of this clear episode of an editor gone bonkers, Labour MP Chris Bryant asked on Twitter: “Is it 1^st April? Was the whole editorial team on acid?” of an article by Robert Mendick and Victoria Ward that was titled: “The photo that ‘clears Duke [of York]’ over bath sex.”

In said piece, the pontificating and pointless paper shared an image of two people sitting in the first-floor bathtub at Ghislaine Maxwell’s former home at 44 Kinnerton Street, Belgravia, London with images of Virginia Roberts Giuffre and Prince Andrew in place of their faces. Bizarre it most definitely was, but newsworthy it was not.

If that was not weird enough, Mendick and Ward then chose to quote Ian Maxwell as if he were some kind of reliable source. The nutjob ranted:

“I am releasing my photos now because the truth needs to come out. They show the truth that the bath is too small for any sort of sex frolicking.”

“The whole of Virginia Giuffre’s case pivots upon a photograph taken more than 20 years ago at my sister’s former house in Kinnerton Street, in Belgravia.”

“It proves nothing. Prince Andrew and my sister think it’s a fake, but I take the view that it’s irrelevant. It just shows that Prince Andrew had his arms around a girl who wanted a photograph, as she has said herself, ‘to show to her mother.’”

“Ghislaine was in custody, and shortly after the picture was taken, the mews house was sold.”

“[Giuffre’s] story relating to having had sex in the bath dates back many years, and the obvious time to put it to her that the bath is too small and makes sex impossible was at the trial. But Virginia Giuffre was never called to give evidence, and the photo never came to light.”

“But her admission that her claim of having sex with Alan Dershowitz may be mistaken and therefore untrue, and given Prince Andrew is considering appealing the settlement, it seemed in the context of that the correct moment to release the images.”

“Prince Andrew has been completely cancelled on the basis of the allegations…The truth really does need to come out. If this photo is helpful in achieving that, then that is what this is all about.”

In January 2022, in a world exclusive subsequently picked up by the Daily Mail also, The Steeple Times revealed the first ever known photograph of the aforementioned bathroom and that this image showed this tub to be exactly what it is – full sized and thus perfectly capable of being a space in which two people could fool around and fornicate.

Prior to this latest release of what should be condemned as nothing but fake news, on 25^th January, Epstein victim lawyer Lisa Bloom tweeted of the matter:

“So important. Prince Andrew’s reported new effort to worm out of the settlement he signed comes just as his buddy Ghislaine Maxwell says Virginia’s photo with Andrew is faked. But OTHER PHOTOS. And she looks like such a little girl in the photo on right. Because she was.”

Editor’s Note – Unlike as is the case in many publications, this article was NOT sponsored or supported by a third-party.

Pictured Top – ‘The Telegraph’s’ front page on Saturday 28^th January and their soppy source, the swivel-eyed half-witted fruitcake Ian Maxwell; that this paper has been taken in by this nutcase is just further proof that this once respectable publication has well and truly gone to the dogs.

When asked about what occurred on the night of 10th March 2001 in the first floor bathroom at her Kinnerton Street mews house, Ghislaine Maxwell responded: “[Virginia Roberts] then characterized [sic] things took place in my bathroom in the bathtub itself. The tub is too small for any kind of activity whatsoever.” The picture of that very same tub used in marketing material by Wellbelove Quested proves exactly to the contrary.

The floor plan shared by the likes ‘The Daily Mail’ and ‘The Sun suggested the first-floor bathroom at the house to be 7-foot, 4 inches by 7-foot, 2-inches. Floor plans shared by estate agents Wellboved Quested suggested that the room is actually 8-foot, 4-inches by 8-foot, 2-inches. There was most definitely plenty of room for two…

A floorplan of 44 Kinnerton Street, Belgravia. In it, mucky madam Ghislaine Maxwell’s home is clearly shown to be a place where ‘public’ entertaining took place on the ground floor, whilst ‘extracurricular’ activities took place on the upper two floors.

These photographs of 44 Kinnerton Street, taken in July 2021, provide proof that the bannisters seen in the March 2001 photographs remain inside said property. The setting in which Prince Andrew and Virginia Roberts were captured was indeed most definitely genuine. In the same month, the new owners of the property displayed a poster at 44 Kinnerton Street for a festival that was to be held in East Anglia from 31st July 2021 to 1st August 2021. The event, the EA Festival, was hosted at Hedingham Castle – home to Jason and Demetra Lindsay – in Essex and had a line-up that included model and advocate Arizona Muse, film director Mike Figgis, ‘Countdown’s’ Susie Dent, sex commentator Rowan Pelling and comedian Josh Berry. The same open doorway also showed something else… The very same bannister that was shown in the photograph Prince Andrew, Virginia Robert and Ghislaine Maxwell appeared in.

This morning on Twitter, Matthew Steeples asked: “Why is Ian Maxwell, brother of Ghislaine Maxwell, trying to make out that the bathtub at her former home at 44 Kinnerton Street, Belgravia too small for Prince Andrew & Virginia Roberts Giuffre to have had sex in? I proved it was of normal size last year.” The majority of respondents thus far have taken the view that “he’s working for Prince Andrew.”

In November 2020, ‘The Steeple Times’ featured bathtub mats featuring Prince Andrew’s face and the caption “nonce” that were available for sale through Redbubble.com. Priced then at £23.61 ($32.30, €28.29 or درهم118.61), these 61cm by 43cm polyester microfiber items clearly proved very popular as they are no longer on the site. Clearly, there is a market for bathtub memorabilia that references the Queen’s supposed favourite son.

THAT 2001 Photo Thus Far NOT PROVEN A FAKE – The 10th March 2001 photograph of Prince Andrew, Virginia Roberts and Ghislaine Maxwell

The photograph, taken supposedly by Jeffrey Epstein on the first floor landing at 44 Kinnerton Street, Belgravia, London, SW1X 8ES, United Kingdom, has been shared by the world’s media in hundreds of thousands of articles and analysed countless times by countless experts.

In November 2019, the Daily Mail’s Inderdeep Bains called it: “The photograph that WON’T go away” and it, as of date, has NEVER been discredited. Amongst evidence suggesting it to be perfectly real is that:
- The setting of the photograph has been confirmed as genuine by the Maxwell family. Of it, in March 2021, Ian Maxwell told Radio 4’s Today programme: “I do recognise that setting.”
- The window in the picture has the same features as the front first floor windows of 44 Kinnerton Street.
- The width of the first floor landing is accurate to the measurements shown in the floor plan of the sales brochure prepared on the 14^th October 2021 by estate agents Wellbelove Quested.
- Though he claimed to be “at a loss to explain this particular photograph” during the 2019 BBC interview, the Duke of York has admitted to having visited 44 Kinnerton Street. He stated: “I don’t think I think ever went upstairs… The dining room and everything was on the ground floor.” Contradicting the royal, sources have claimed that the room behind him, Roberts and Maxwell in the photograph was used as a sitting room.
- The heights of all three individuals in the picture look to be accurate proportionately.
- Prince Andrew’s “chubby fingers” are clear to see. The Queen’s second son’s fingers are clearly “chubby fingers” and these very same “chubby fingers” have been seen hundreds of thousands of times in hundreds of thousands of other photographs.
- Prince Andrew has claimed he only ever goes out in London in a suit and tie. Images of him in open necked shirts in the capital – including one of him leaving the nightclub Chinawhite – prove to the contrary.
- Prince Andrew has claimed he does not “do” hugs and and embraces in photographs. Images of him taken in St Tropez embracing the US socialite Chris Von Aspen in July 2007 suggest the alleged non-sweater is wrong also on that score.
- The outfit worn by Virginia Roberts – a woman who has already received financial settlements from Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell – has been seen on her in photographs of her at Naomi Campbell’s 2001 birthday party in France. In spite of some suggestions that a lady only wears an outfit once, we counter that a lady in Miss Roberts’ unfortunate situation would be forced to wear what she was told appealed to those in control of her wished her to wear.
- Matthew Steeples of The Steeple Times and Shaun Attwood of Shaun Attwood’s True Crime Channel have both seen inside 44 Kinnerton Street and the stair rail shown in the photo remains in place and is thus genuine to the setting. Attwood subsequently released film footage of this on his YouTube channel and The Steeple Times shared its most recent image of the open front door with the stair rail beyond in July 2021.
- Many experts have repeatedly stated photo manipulation was in its infancy at the time that this image first surfaced.
- The FBI have never questioned the authenticity of the image.
Twitter reacts to ‘The Telegraph’ being taken in by Ian Maxwell’s tall-tales…

The Names & Numbers – ‘Mucky Madam Ghislaine Maxwell’s Bathtub Bonk Pad’ – 44 Kinnerton Street, Belgravia, London, SW1X 8ES, United Kingdom
- 28^th January 2023 – Valued at £2.317 million ($2.871 million, €2.641 million or درهم10.544 million) on TheMoveMarket.com, a sum 32.4% higher than the April 2021 sale price and a sum 503.4% higher than the January 1997 sale price.
- 14^th January 2022 – Property website TheMoveMarket.com values the house at £2.11 million ($2.88 million, €2.53 million or درهم59 million), a sum 19% lower than the current asking price for the unrenovated property.
- January 2022 – Estate agents Wellbelove Quested offer the mews house for £2.6 million ($3.6 million, €3.1 million or درهم1 million), an extraordinary increase of 49% on the sale price just 270 days earlier. The house is offered on a lease of 127 years that commenced on 24^th June 2014 and previously on their website Wellbelove Quested had marketed the house for a higher price of £2.75 million ($3.738 million, €3.283 million or درهم13.731 million).
- July 2021 – The Steeple Times reports on repainting work to the outside of the house being underway. An open door reveals the infamous staircase bannister to still be in-situ.
- 19^th April 2021 – Records confirm the house to have been sold for £1.75 million ($2.39 million, €2.09 million or درهم79 million).
- March 2021 – Ghislaine Maxwell’s lawyer offered cash from the “pending sale of her £1.45 million ($2 million, €1.74 million or درهم28 million)” home as part of a package when they sought bail for the mucky madam for a third time, the Daily Mail reported. This sum was 44% lower than the September 2020 asking price and 400% higher than the January 1997 purchase price.
- March 2021 – A Knightsbridge estate agent told The Steeple Times: “Knowing the street as I do, 44 is one of the smaller houses which I assume it to be a little over 1,000 square foot in size. Depending on the condition, I estimate the freehold value to be circa £1.8 million to £2 million ($2.5 million to $2.7 million, €2.2 million to €2.4 million or 9درهم million to درهم10 million).”
- December 2020 – Members of the Maxwell family attempted to raise finance on the property but are not successful, The Steeple Times learns from a financier with connections to the Maxwell family and their representatives. They were rejected, were rejected on the basis of the “toxicity” of their familial name.
- September 2020 – Estate agents Aylesford list 44 Kinnerton Street for sale for £2.6 million ($3.6 million, €3.1 million or درهم1 million) on (it was claimed) a freehold basis, a sum 797% than the January 1997 purchase price. They subsequently later reduce the asking price to £2.1 million ($2.9 million, €2.5 million or درهم10.5 million) “according to a leading property expert.”
- August 2019 – According to Insider, a woman with “long hair [who] appeared to be in her 60s” was seen entering the property. She “denied that the socialite owns or lived in the house, claiming instead that the elusive socialite lived elsewhere down the street.”
- 10^th March 2001 – Prince Andrew allegedly had sexual relations with 17-year-old Virginia Roberts in a bathroom in the property. He continues to deny this occurred whilst claiming that a photograph of himself with Miss Roberts and Ghislaine Maxwell on the first floor of building is a fake also.
- 22^nd January 1997 – Ghislaine Maxwell paid £290,000 ($396,000, €347,000 or درهم5 million) for the three-storey leasehold mews house. It is situated at the heart of the Duke of Westminster’s Grosvenor Estate.
- 1989 to 1995 – Ghislaine Maxwell is known to have resided at 69 Stanhope Mews East, South Kensington, London, SW7 5QT. Her father bought it for her two years before his mysterious death and she reportedly “groomed and befriended Minor Victim 3 in London, England, between approximately 1994 and 1995… Maxwell introduced Minor Victim 3 to Epstein and during those interactions, Maxwell encouraged Minor Victim 3 to massage Epstein, knowing that Epstein would engage in sex acts with Minor Victim 3. During those massages, Epstein sexually abused Minor Victim 3” at that very property. It was sold for £267,000 ($365,000, €320,000 or درهم3 million) on 15^th March 1995 and then again for £1.75 million ($2.39 million, €2.10 million or درهم8.77 million) on 30^th August 2019.
January 28, 2023
I’m All Ears – Criminal Dale Poppleton (With Half-An-Ear Missing) Goes Viral On Social Media; ‘Earless Today, Earless Tomorrow’

Mugshot of half-an-earless criminal Dale Poppleton goes viral on social media; he’s got a look of Van Gogh meets Evander Holyfield, yet it’s still to be heard what his latest crimes actually are

“Looking forward to Apple suing him for copyright infringement; he looks like the Apple logo” remarked one Twitter user after West Yorkshire Police shared a mugshot of a criminal named Dale Poppleton earlier this week. Another mused: “Looks like Mike Tyson had a bite out of his ear” whilst one responded: “I haven’t seen him round ear.”

The image, which has unsurprisingly gone viral on social media channels including Facebook and Twitter, was accompanied by the caption: “Have you seen Dale Poppleton? Wanted in connection with a serious offence in Bradford, could be in the North of England,” but it was the press release that it linked to that truly amused.

In it, the force shared a glaringly obvious observation about this 41-year-old individual. They ever so lackadaisically added: “[Mr Poppleton] is very distinctive due to the fact that he has half an ear (right side).”

Going further of a 6’1” tall, half-an-earless man previously labelled an “accomplished criminal” in 2020 when “he was sentenced to three years and nine months in jail for burglary,” the MailOnline’s Matt Powell mused: “During the trial Bradford Crown Court heard how Poppleton had 19 previous convictions for 99 offences, many of them for matters of dishonesty.”

Finishing their press release, West Yorkshire Police concluded:

“He is thought to have connections to not only the Bradford area but the North of England. He was last seen in East Yorkshire. Extensive enquiries have been carried out to locate Poppleton but he is deliberately evading Police. Anyone who sees Poppleton is asked not to approach him.”

The force failed to mention whether or not they are in possession of the missing piece from Poppleton’s ear. In 1997, after Mike Tyson bit off part of Evander Holyfield’s ear during a fight, the former later apologised. In 2013, speaking to The Sunday Times, Tyson remarked: “I see Evander every now and again. We actually did an ESPN commercial together, and I gave him his ear back in formaldehyde.”

Editor’s Note – Unlike as is the case in many publications, this article was NOT sponsored or supported by a third-party.

Twitter reacts to half-an-earless “what a boat race” Dale Poppleton… “This appeal will just fall on deaf ear(s). Once caught, give him an earful.”

The worst ever ‘famous face’ mugshots…

In December 2016, Swiss born ‘Bride of Wildenstein’ Jocelyn Wildenstein (née Périsset) got her claws out and stuck them into her on-off lover Lloyd Klein at her apartment in Trump Tower, New York. She was arrested “after gouging her boyfriend’s face with her nails and stabbing him twice in the chest with her scissors.” She subsequently appeared in court later in the day charged with felony assault charges in the second degree and ‘The Steeple Times’ later reported: “She [was] accused of inflicting injuries with a weapon against 49-year old Canadian couturier Lloyd Klein and allegedly poured hot wax over him, ‘went for his face with her nails’ and ‘grabbed some scissors and stabbed them twice into his chest.’ The cat-like woman is to said to have been provoked into the violent frenzy after Klein allegedly failed to ‘pay her enough attention’ after an evening meal, according to an unnamed source who spoke with the ‘MailOnline.’”

‘Hot mugshot guy’ Jeremy Meeks went viral on social media after people claimed the image taken after his July 2014 arrest was suggested to be “showing his smouldering model good looks.” This violent criminal got two Hollywood agents, given deals with big brands and subsequently got engaged to and had a brat with the repugnant ratbag Sir Philip Green’s fat pudding of a daughter. The couple unsurprisingly subsequently split up and whilst Meeks lived-it-up with other women, Chloe Green got herself up-the-duff by another geezer. Classy.

Since croaked paedophile Jeffrey Epstein didn’t show anyone contrition when snapped after his arrest on 6th July 2019 by the FBI-NYPD Crimes Against Children Task Force at Teterboro Airport in New Jeresey on sex trafficking charges.

The worst ever ‘non-famous face’ mugshots…

January 27, 2023
Scobie’s Scuttled – Has Meghan Markle Ditched Boring Blabber Omid Scobie?

Has the Duchess of Sussex ditched boring blabber Omid Scobie and will his forthcoming ‘book’ just prove to be another bag of bilge?

Just as it has been revealed that Virginia Roberts Giuffre – the woman who received a sum estimated as anything upto £9.7 million ($12 million, €11 million or درهم44.1 million) from a man she never met if you believe his narrative, Prince Andrew – is about to pen her memoirs, a very boring blabber is preparing to blab yet again also.

Currently, Omid Scobie is doing the rounds (or what what he prefers to bombastically term “the beat”) talking about his forthcoming tittle-tattling tome which is to be titled Endgame. The sequel to the bag of bilge that was Finding Freedom will be published on 1^st August and though this sapless spiv is clearly beginning early on his pontificating, promotional rounds, what is clear is that he has likely been scuttled by his puppet mistress, the currently ‘missing,’ mendacious menace formerly known as Meghan Markle.

In comments to the self-declared “polymath” Micheal Timilehin Omoniyi yesterday shared in a 0:34-minute video clip released on Twitter whilst wearing a baseball cap, Scobie whined:

“[The Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s] mere existence, their mere story has raised issues about misogyny within the institution and the monarchy; about unconscious bias and racism. And I know how Harry called it ‘unconscious bias,’ but I’m still going to call it racism because I think that it is only not racist when it’s unconscious. The second someone makes it conscious to you and you try and minimise it or skirt the topic or ‘recollections may vary’ it, that is racism… Even me saying that makes people feel uncomfortable.”

Speaking in September 2021, the British-Persian ‘journalist’ and boring blabber had described his last known encounter with the duke and duchess as involving a “big farewell hug.” Going further, at that time, he cringeworthily claimed: “Meghan told him: ‘It didn’t have to be this way.’ I think she wanted to share that last moment because it is a moment in history, but also to do it in an environment she felt safe in.”

Tellingly of the twaddle he’s subsequently peddled, the dimwitted dunce added in comments reported in The Independent: “He said he doesn’t ‘even know if the Sussexes like me, to be honest,’ adding that ‘press is press.’”

Updating the situation on Tuesday, the Daily Express’s Emma Crabtree turned to Prince Harry “accusing Scobie of writing ‘utter nonsense’ about Meghan’s fake kidnapping” and “lying” about a story he included in Finding Freedom about a “staged kidnapping.”

Commenting on this in the article, GB News host Dan Wootton “accused Scobie of being a sycophant to the shunned Sussexes by calling him a ‘hagiographer’ and slammed the authoritative tone of the royal commentator.”

Wootton added: “It all sounds very dramatic doesn’t it, and very authoritative from oddball Scobie… I would say to Scobie, don’t take it personally, after all Harry’s book was a pack of lies too.”

Meanwhile elsewhere yesterday, The Steeple Times was sent a ‘mindmap’ illustrating the links between the alleged ‘yacht girl’ that is the Duchess of Sussex and Prince Andrew and Harvey Weinstein. A fascinating illustration which we share below, this document was first published on a site named Project Fangirl on 18^th November 2022, but where it could go further would be to add in names such as Ghislaine Maxwell, Markus Anderson, Piers Morgan and Scobie himself even. Here, yet again, is proof that the world of ‘MeGain’ is nothing but a murky, mucky mess and one that petulant pillock Prince Harry should never have got himself involved in.

Editor’s Note – Unlike as is the case in many publications, this article was NOT sponsored or supported by a third-party.

Pictured Top – A rather startled Omid Scobie (left) and his puppet mistress the Duchess of Sussex (right) with her allegedly gay ‘bestie’ Markus Anderson.

The ‘mindmap’ detailing the links between the Duchess of Sussex and Harvey Weinstein is a fascinating one and includes the likes of Larry King, Amol Rajan, Rachael Ray, Lindsay Roth and Sunshine Sachs. There is, however, much more to this and many more noxious names deserve to be added; amongst them Markus Anderson, Ghislaine Maxwell and Omid Scobie.

Omid Scobie is most definitely plastic and not fantastic, but how long will he last without his puppet mistress giving him permission to lie on her behalf? Perhaps, in the coming months, this definite ‘melt’ will just melt away and then we can all say: “Good bloody riddance.”

The House of York and the Houses of Paedophiles – In 2006, the pugnacious paedophiles Harvey Weinstein, Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell partied at Windsor Castle with the Duke of York, his ex-wife Sarah, Duchess of York and their two daughters Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie. Did nobody think to do a test on the guest list for criminal perverts? Clearly not.

On 19th December 2016, the dimwitted dunce Sarah, Duchess of York attended a “VIP screening” of ‘Lion’ hosted by Harvey Weinstein and Georgina Chapman at Soho House in London. Whether Markus Anderson arranged this event is unknown, but the former Meghan Markle’s mate Princess Eugenie of York most definitely showed up also.

The friendship between Oprah Winfrey – a regular on the roster of spinners for the Duke and Duchess of Sussex and their deviancy – and Harvey Weinstein cannot be shown to be anything but clear. This picture proves how much the former clearly adored the latter now jailed sex offender.

Omid Scobie has been called out by his old chum’s husband Prince Harry as nothing but a muckspreading teller of untruths. His answer? “Surprise.”

Scobie claims to be “stuck in a fever dream” for now; likely soon, this washed-up wazzock will just be a forgotten syllable in a chapter that the royal family would actually rather just forever forget.

January 26, 2023
Where Is Meghan Markle? Where Has The Meddling Menace Duchess of Sussex Vanished To?
Where has the never-normally-far-from-the-limelight meddling menace formerly known as Meghan Markle vanished to?

A woman known normally for displaying more front than Harrods, the deviant diva that is the Duchess of Sussex has literally vanished off the face of the planet. Normally, as she has repeatedly said in the past “always moving together,” the fact that the “like salt and pepper” duo that are her and her hapless husband have not been seen together in weeks is telling.

Said by some to be allowing Prince Harry his own space to promote his tittle-tattling tome Spare, ‘Moaning Meg’ is likely, given the flooding that devastated the surrounding area recently, not at her £14 million Montecito mansion.

Instead, this hard-faced harridan, it has been claimed, could have returned to her old chums from her Suits days in Canada or possibly headed to Washington to begin what she supposedly desires most next – a career in politics. As Prince Harry once said: “What Meghan wants, Meghan gets” and a frontline role in the Democratic Party is very much on her tick list.

For this former actress, this move would likely, however, come too soon. Presently, even the once loathed and detested Queen Consort, Camilla, is more popular than her in America – with an official poll ranking the former -13 and the latter -8.

Aside from facing upto and settling a lawsuit from her far more sensible sister, Samantha Markle, it might be better for this deranged duchess to do something else. It is time for this alleged former ‘yacht girl’ to Prince Andrew to head off to Siberia and if they’re not divorcing – as some have predicted – she ought to take her seriously stupid sidekick with her; ‘MeGain’ ought to get gone and simply never come back.

Editor’s Note – Unlike as is the case in many publications, this article was NOT sponsored or supported by a third-party.

Where has the mendacious menace formerly known as Meghan Markle vamoosed to? She has literally vanished off the face of the planet but where has she gone?
— Matthew Steeples (@M_Steeples) January 25, 2023

What’s the truth about the stories that abound about the Duchess of Sussex?
- In November 2021, the duchess was forced to apologise to the Appeal Court in London for making a misleading statement in her privacy case against The Mail on Sunday’s publishers.
- Her very own father, Thomas, has called out her many untruths about him and others again, again and again.
- Of her claiming having got married the day before she actually did, Mr Markle stated: “Lying about the archbishop? How can you say: ‘We’ve been married three days before we got married’? Her lies are so obvious, I don’t know why she says them.”
- Her very own half-sister, Samantha Markle, who is currently bringing a defamation case against her, has called her out as a liar on multiple occasions also. It has been proven that the duchess’s claim that she hasn’t seen her sibling in over 20 years was untrue given a photo of the pair together 14 years ago proves quite to the contrary.
- Her very own half-brother, Thomas Jr., said of her: “I told Prince Harry, I think she’s going to ruin your life. She’s very shallow… She’s a phony, a bully, a jaded, shallow, conceited woman.”
- The wife of Prince Harry has been called out on multiple occasions for spinning stories against other members of the royal family, most especially the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge.
- Staff who’ve worked for her have complained that she is a bully and investigations into this remain ongoing.
- The Duchess of Sussex is a known manipulator of the press and paparazzis and it has been claimed that she’ll “twist the truth” to get any headline she wants.
- Questions remain as to how many times she’s actually been married in total. Some say twice, some say thrice.
- What’s the truth about Meghan’s mother Doria Ragland? Is this clearly equally manipulative woman an honest and decent citizen or is she a jailbird who has spent time in the clink?
- Did the ‘Montecito Meddler’ meet Prince Andrew or Prince Harry first? Rumours abound that she could have spent time and holidayed with the former as long ago as 2001 and that her claim to have no prior knowledge of the royal family until 2016 is just utter baloney.
- “Would you trust this woman with a bargepole?” is something often asked of this money motivated minx.
Could the Duchess of Sussex be with her allegedly gay ‘bestie’ Markus Anderson? The Soho House employee is always close to anything murky that is going on with this mendacious minx and he’s undoubtedly the first person she turns to with any problem.

Could the wicked wench formerly known as Meghan Markle be with her ever-willing to say anything she tells him PR peddler Omid Scobie? Prince Harry has made out that ‘Finding Freedom’ included clear lies in recent days whilst promoting ‘Spare’ and in response Scobie has clearly begun to turn on his masters. In comments, reported on in the ‘Daily Express,’ the ‘author’ remarked: “In many ways, how can a regular person not have Sussex fatigue at this point? I almost feel it’s like my duty to follow it every step of the way, but I can understand how general members of the public have just had enough of hearing about the royal dramas in general. I sympathise with the Sussexes in some ways, because they’re only now getting to join the story at this very late stage. For many years, they weren’t able to share their side. They watched others try and tell versions of it or they sat back and watched things reported about them that they didn’t agree with or didn’t feel were a fair representation of themselves. So now they’ve come in with their versions of events, with their stories and are filling in the gaps that we didn’t know about. But of course, it comes after years and years of coverage. So, I think people are starting to get a little tired of the story in general.”

Could the deranged diva Duchess of Sussex and her mouthy mother Doria Ragland be hiding out in Canada or could she be spinning herself into the world of politics in Washington even? The truth is always stranger than fiction with ‘MeGain’ and God only knows what this psycho will do next.
January 25, 2023
Anything But ‘Snow White’ – Barbarian Banker Jes Staley And Grubby Groper Ghislaine Maxwell Are Far From Innocent

As Ghislaine Maxwell gets ready for her first telly box appearance since hitting the clink tonight, old chum casino banker Jes Staley gets another very public shaming; Snow White this pair ain’t

Weirder-than-weird wacko Jeffrey Epstein supposedly survived on a strict diet of lettuce leaves. This Ponzi scheming taxi driver turned billionaire of means of curious sources did not drink, allegedly did not take drugs and supposedly abhorred smoking also. Like his fellow non-sweaty teetotal ‘bestie’ Prince Andrew, Epstein “preferred a small circle of friends” and “showered many times a day.” He did, however, like to send emails to his very, very obliging financier Jes Staley containing the very, very telling code words “snow white.”

Jailbird Ghislaine Maxwell, meanwhile, in times happier, was a bit of a boozer. Though vegan, like her caviar devouring daddy, she’s regularly been cited as a bit of a Krug swiller, but if she thinks she’s going to get rewarded with a flute of such after tonight’s forthcoming interview with the repugnant ratbag Jeremy Kyle, she will likely find herself very much mistaken. She’ll be lucky if she gets a glass of Ribena, but what this delusional deviant may well get is a ‘reminder’ visit to her cell from someone associated with the many, many powerful people she’s been until now protecting.

Returning to the alleged enabler of the pugnacious paedophiles Epstein and Maxwell that is Jes Staley, last night in the Daily Mail, the paper’s Tom Leonard asked: “Why DID former Barclays boss visit [the] convicted paedophile when he was in jail?” Leonard highlighted the ‘considerably-richer-than-yow’ Staley and his swivel-eyed heiress wife Debora’s “philanthropy” but also made clear that victims have alleged the deservedly disgraced casino banker to be “one of Epstein’s closest pals.”

One victim, named only as ‘Jane Doe 1,’ has claimed Staley watched on willingly as Epstein “sexually grabbed young women in front of him” and “benefitted from their close relationship in the receipt of massages, private jet flights with victims or co-conspirators of the operation, and other things of value.”

Going further, ‘Jane Doe 1’ added: “[Staley] was the key to making all of Epstein’s depraved dreams of sexual abuse and sex trafficking of countless young women possible.”

Elsewhere yesterday in The Mail on Sunday, surprise, surprise the decidedly dislikable Daphne Barak – a chum of amongst others “she whose husband allegedly slept with Ghislaine Maxwell on multiple occasions” Hillary Clinton and “she who won’t say if she repaid loans from Jeffrey Epstein” Sarah, Duchess of York – was allowed to spin yet another yarn relating to this continually evolving case. In it, this PR-peddler-not-a-real-journalist laughably claimed that the Duke of York has “assembled a £10 million ($12.3 million, €11.4 million or درهم45.3 million) war chest to launch [a] legal case against accuser Virginia Giuffre.”

Citing the proven liar and convicted criminal Maxwell as her source and evidence in spite of the fact the 10^th March 2001 photograph taken at the Kinnerton Street, Belgravia mews house has never been proven as anything other than genuine, Barak quoted a surprise, surprise unnamed “royal source” who stated that ‘Randy Andy’ wanted to “prove his innocence in a US court” and whom added:

“He was pressured into settling the case to avoid overshadowing the Platinum Jubilee and has paid a heavy price, personally and professionally.”

“The King is happy for him to pursue this. As Head of State, he can’t back him publicly, but Andrew is still his brother and he wants the best for him.”

Responding in the Mirror, Lisa Bloom – a lawyer for several victims of Epstein and also for Shukri Walker, a woman who claims to have witnessed the Duke of York with Virginia Roberts Giuffre on 10^th March 2001 at Tramp nightclub in tony St James’s, London – argued that King Charles III’s brother should “forget it” and “just feel grateful that he is not in jail.”

Going further, Bloom added:

“Prince Andrew signed his name to a settlement. And now he wants out? Forget it. Not going to happen. Nor should it, because the pain he would inflict on Virginia. Leave her alone. Live up to your agreement. Man up.”

In August 2020, Walker declared:

“When I watched the BBC interview and saw Prince Andrew deny knowing Virginia, saying he has no recollection of that night, I had to come forward. Because I was there and I do have recollection of it.”

“He looked like he was having a great time. And he was with this young girl who was close to my own age, perhaps even a bit younger than me.”

“They were not that alone. They were with the woman who has just been arrested [Ghislaine Maxwell], and Epstein. I will never forget that night because I was told this is a real prince.”

“That’s the moment that stood out for me. I don’t think I would have remembered otherwise.”

“I do remember the little girl perhaps was a little bit drunk or just had a weird expression, an awkward expression. But she wasn’t smiling, it was the opposite of smiles.”

Editor’s Note – Unlike as is the case in many publications, this article was NOT sponsored or supported by a third-party.

“I was her parents’ worst nightmare” – words said by James Staley his very self – will be ringing in the ears of swivel-eyed Debbie Nitzan Staley in the wake of her husband’s former company’s decision to not yet payout £22 million the couple were expecting. No doubt that’ll mean one less holiday for her and her two daughters on their 90-foot long gin palace ‘Bequia’ in the coming years.

The Duke of York (pictured guffawing with the equally greedy “Chanel-clad” charity tin grabber Baroness Meyer) has previously made no secret of his dislike for the media and has been known even to suggested he disliked “those ***** journalists who poke their noses everywhere.” Given the possibility that he might now try and overturn the agreement he made with Virginia Roberts Giuffre last year, he might find himself getting even more unwanted media attention in the coming months than is normal even for his awful self.

The rotten royal’s Range Rover was attacked in Windsor last year by a woman who furiously thumped on the vehicle’s window. If he goes down the path of attempting to rewrite the history of his involvement with the paedophiles Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, he may find himself akin to a modern-day Marie Antoinette.

Ghislaine Maxwell allegedly got upto all sorts with Bill Clinton. Aside from no doubt hoovering up a bit of “snow white” together, the pair supposedly used Jeffrey Epstein as a cover whilst they conducted a clandestine affair sexual.

Miss Maxwell (AKA Mrs Scott Borgerson) was so ingrained with President Clinton that she attended his daughter Chelsea Clinton’s 31st July 2010 wedding to Marc Mezvinsky at Astor Courts in Rhinebeck, New York.

Equally, Clinton made plenty of effort to spend time with Jeffrey Epstein and flew on his ‘Lolita Express’ private jets at least 27 times and possibly many more besides.

Ghislaine Maxwell’s mouthpiece Daphne Barak shared an image of herself with Sarah, Duchess of York on her Twitter account late last year. She did not declare, however, if she’d ask the dimwitted duchess if she’d ever repaid the loans and other benefits in kind she took from the croaked paedophile Jeffrey Epstein.

January 23, 2023
How The Mighty Fall… Grubby Groper Ghislaine Maxwell To Slum It In TV Interview With Sickening Shock Jock Jeremy Kyle

As it is announced Ghislaine Maxwell is to be interviewed by Jeremy Kyle, one is left asking: “Is this part of the mucky madam sex offender’s calculating strategy as she seeks an appeal?”

A Manchester district judge, Alan Berg, once branded The Jeremy Kyle Show a “human form of bear-baiting.” He went further and suggested “it seems to be me that its whole purpose is to effect a morbid and depressing display of dysfunctional people who are in some kind of turmoil” and now its former host is about to engage with someone far worse.

That person? On Monday, Kyle returns to our screens with an interview with the imprisoned noxious nonce Ghislaine Maxwell. In a way, one can suppose, this wicked woman can be surmised an ideal ‘subject,’ but equally one is left questioning how someone who once hung out with presidents and princes has now denigrated herself to such a low-level.

Aired on some 3,000 occasions on ITV between 2005 and 2019, the now deservedly cancelled “dark and dangerous” The Jeremy Kyle Show show featured a braying assembly of hoodlums on a set where guests simply had to be as obnoxious as possible. Kyle, the now 57-year-old son of a personal secretary to the late Queen Mother, egged them on, whilst the studio audience jeered and jostled to join in with what can only be described as a “sh*tshow” of car crash proportions.

Almost anything went on what was also unsurprisingly called out as “the vilest show on the planet.” Aside from lie detectors and DNA and paternity tests, Kyle and his security guards presided over a gathering of what can only be described as the detritous of humanity, but what he will be enquiring of the monstrous menace that is Ghislaine Maxwell has yet to be properly revealed.

Whilst The Jeremy Kyle Show’s supposedly “most hated guest ever,” Dwayne Davison of Nottingham, subsequently claimed participating to have been “the worst thing that has ever happened in my life” and that it had “ruined” his life, Maxwell is clearly banking on trying to get the public she previously treated like the ‘great unwashed’ on her side. We already know this convicted criminal to be cold and calculating, but what benefit she and her and her advisors think will come of this will most certainly be deserving of analysis post-showing.

According to the MailOnline’s chief reporter Martin Robinson, the host – whose ITV show was axed after a guest took his own life following a lie detector test – will use the TalkTV interview on the Rupert Murdoch owned channel to “lift the lid on Epstein, Prince Andrew and even our late Queen.” In an announcement, Kyle added: “This is Ghislaine Maxwell behind bars and in her own words.” He does not, however, add mention of whether he’s got a lie detector or a dose of pontificating PR peddler Brian Basham to go with that.

Editor’s Note – Unlike as is the case in many publications, this article was NOT sponsored or supported by a third-party.

Pictured Top – Jeremy Kyle liked to use “double lie detectors” on his show (right); boob bagger Ghislaine Maxwell is in need of being subjected to such as it might force her to admit the truth; she should also finally show some decency and name the names of those she so disgustingly sex trafficked her many, many victims to.

Is mucky madam sex fiend Ghislaine Maxwell illustrating intelligent strategy by going on @TalkTV on Monday with shock jock Jeremy Kyle @JeremyKyleLive? #GhislaineMaxwell #JeremyKyle #TalkTV #JeffreyEpstein #PrinceAndrew #abuse #crime #truecrimecommunity #truecrime #arrest #weird
— Matthew Steeples (@M_Steeples) January 21, 2023

On Saturday morning on Twitter, Matthew Steeples asked: “Is mucky madam sex fiend Ghislaine Maxwell illustrating intelligent strategy by going on Talk TV on Monday with shock jock Jeremy Kyle?” He asked followers to vote as to whether this is a “calculating and clever move” or whether this showed “she’s mental and delusional.” A further two options offered were that this represents a move by her “PR peddlers spinning away” and a suggestion that “she’s being fed to the wolves” to keep those powerful people she associated with – such as Bill Clinton, Donald Trump and Prince Andrew – from having to answer questions. After all, here is a wicked wastrel woman who was convicted of sex trafficking her victims, but here is a case where no one has been convicted of ‘receiving’ these very victims.

How the mighty fall… Ghislaine Maxwell was first incarcerated after being arrested in Bradford, New Hampshire on 2nd July 2020. Kept at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn, New York prior to her trial, the wicked wench is now serving her sentence at FCI Tallahassee in Florida. It is from there that she conducted the interview with Jeremy Kyle that will air on TalkTV on Monday 23rd January 2023.

“My daughter accused me of stealing and then said she slept with my fiancé!” was a typical staged encounter that occurred on the ITV show. Surely even the audacious pension pot plunderer Robert Maxwell wouldn’t have ever lowered himself to appear on such a show, yet his definitely deviant daughter has clearly decided that lowering herself to such a level might actually be a strategy that could help her win over the court of public opinion. Is she deranged or is there method in her madness?

The main host on TalkTV is Piers Morgan. Pictured here with Ghislaine Maxwell at a launch party for Geordie Greig’s ‘Breakfast with Lucien’ book on 21st October 2013 at a private residence in New York, Morgan now regularly gets called out for having appeared in a number of photographs with the convicted sex offender but continues to claim that he did not actually know her well.

Equally, illustrating another link to TalkTV, the ‘Bouncing Czech’s’ grubby groper daughter was happily snapped with the channel’s owner, Rupert Murdoch, at the fifth ‘Important Dinner for Women’ in New York on 20th September 2010. In spite of the intense rivalry between Rupert Murdoch and Robert Maxwell in the years prior to the latter’s death, it is clear that the feud between the two newspapers barons did not continue beyond the grave and that friendly relations developed between Ghislaine Maxwell and the House of Murdoch subsequently.

How the mighty fall… In times happier, Ghislaine Maxwell was able to live it up at Royal Ascot with her mate and alleged lover Prince Andrew (left); Piers Morgan meanwhile has been known to turn up there also with Jeremy Kyle also (right).

How the mighty fall… In times happier, Ghislaine Maxwell lived it up at parties at palaces and counted Mick Jagger (left) and Donald Trump (right) amongst her social circle. Her and her fat and fearsome father cultivated power and privilege, but that she has now lowered herself to the base of humanity and Jeremy Kyle speaks volumes as to the fact that she’s now a bottom feeding slurry tank dweller.

Yesterday’s ‘MailOnline’ article about the forthcoming interview concluded with a remark from the mucky madam’s “spokesman.” One can only presume this to have been either Brian Basham (most likely) or either her brother Kevin Maxwell or her former British based PR peddler Ross Gow, but that they say: “Her spirits are holding up as you might expect of an innocent woman” simply shows how delusional this deranged woman and those around her truly are.

Jeremy Kyle once said: “Some people will always think I’ve got the eyes of Satan. Others will think I’m a TV God. People have the right to criticise.” Many will say that his forthcoming subject has, like her monstrous father, the eyes of Satan also and many will also criticise his television interview with Jeffrey Epstein’s lover turned girl procurer.

January 21, 2023