According to this morning’s Telegraph, “2020 is the year of the loafer, apparently.”

The paper’s Adrian Clark, this development has been “[cited] to a return to smarter dressing and the revival of the classic Ivy League look,” but where the author goes wrong is in stating: “As for the socks or no socks question, well that’s up to you.”

As I have observed previously, not wearing socks is the preserve of the naff and foolish in a damp, cold country like Britain. Rightly banned in an Edinburgh pub named The Dreadnought for “making the place look scruffy,” going sockless also will result in “sweaty and stinky feet as well as some nasty smelling shoes” according to Hespoke Style.

Continue the thread

Two stories to keep beside you

lego man
From the same Steeple territory

Look out for Lego man

Matthew Steeples explores the story behind finding a wandering Lego man

Thicke socks the students
From the same Steeple territory

Thicke socks the students

Robin Thicke dismisses campuses who banned his song as ‘ridiculous’ When Robin Thicke’s Blurred Lines became a worldwide No 1, it also became a talking point on BBC Radio 4’s Woman’s Hour after Edinburgh University started a UK-wide movement by banning it from their campuses.

Frankly, unless you want to look like a prized berk, do the right thing. If you’re going to wear loafers, jolly well invest a natty pair of socks to accompany them.

Facebook: @TheSteepleTimes

Instagram: @TheSteepleTimes

Advertisement

Twitter: @SteepleTimes and @M_Steeples

Stick A Sock On – Loafers and the socks or no socks question – Matthew Steeples criticises ‘The Telegraph’ for suggesting men can wear loafers without socks.
One has to ask a man (who plainly is not a gentleman) who sports loafers with turned up trousers: “Can you not afford a pair of socks?”