Category: Jeffrey Epstein

Windbag Writer Defends Windbag Ball & Cat Kicker

“Very unkind” windbag writer Rachel Johnson, a sympathiser of convicted mucky madam sex offender Ghislaine Maxwell, offers sympathies windbag ball and cat kicker Kurt Zouma

“Poundland muckspreader” and “associate of two dirty dildo floggers” Baroness Brady of Knightsbridge CBE has been deservedly slammed for not firing Kurt Zouma, an overpaid kicker of bags of wind for West Ham, after he giggled as he got his brother to film him kicking and slapping a cat in his kitchen.

Now, the Prime Minister’s somewhat off her merry rocker sister, windbag writer Rachel Johnson, has decided to stick her claws in and on her LBC radio show yesterday suggested:

“Listen, I mean I know, thank God it’s after the watershed. I am not a cat person… However, I do think we are in danger of overreacting and cancelling Kurt Zouma for one misguided kick in his kitchen which his silly brother posted on social media.”

“He’s 27, clearly he’s old enough to know better, but do we really want to live in a world where one silly mistake can lead to the end of somebody’s career? I think we don’t.”

“I think he’s taken his punishment, his cats are no longer in the house. I think he should apologise and move on. I think there are bigger issues at stake.”

As we said of Baroness Brady – who pathetically excused this animal abuser and even suggested he could “turn something negative into long-lasting positives” – yesterday and we repeat again to Rachel Johnson today: “Try telling that to the poor abused cat.”

Previously, in November 2021, ‘Rabid Rachel’ penned another ‘excuse article’ for The Spectator that was rightly condemned as “sickening.” In it, the daughter of Stanley Johnson – a man whose first wife declared: “He hit me many times, over many years… He broke my nose. He made me feel like I deserved it” – offered her thoughts on the trial of the since convicted mucky madam sex offender Ghislaine Maxwell and disgracefully declared:

“It’s hard not to feel a batsqueak of pity for Ghislaine Maxwell – 500 days and counting in solitary confinement.”

“I intersected briefly with her at Oxford. As a fresher I wandered into Balliol JCR one day in search of its subsidised breakfast granola-and-Nescafé offering and found a shiny glamazon with naughty eyes holding court astride a table, a high-heeled boot resting on my brother Boris’s thigh.”

“She gave me a pitying glance but I did manage to snag an invite to her party in Headington Hill Hall – even though I wasn’t in the same college as her and Boris. I have a memory of her father, Bob, coming out in a towelling robe and telling us all to go home.”

“I’m sure fairweather friends would not reveal they went to a Ghislaine Maxwell party: as Barbara Amiel’s brilliant memoir Friends and Enemies proves, you only know who your real chums are when you’re in the gutter.”

Clearly Rachel Johnson – who believes being “called unkind… really cuts to the quick” – is a woman with a moral compass as warped as not only her buffoon brother Boris Johnson, but also a woman who’ll excuse the activities of both the abusers of animals and humans. Perhaps it is now time for this blonde bozo to reassess her recent remarks and realise that the cats and victims of a sick sex trafficker are the ones she’s most definitely been most unkind to.

Pictured top – West Ham’s cat abuser Kurt Zouma, convicted sexual abusers Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein and continually abusive of power and privilege siblings Rachel and Boris Johnson.

https://twitter.com/LBC/status/1492972471271710721

Rachel Johnson got her breasts out against Brexit in February 2019.

The LBC presenter with her father and siblings.

Karren Brady – another defender of cat abuser Kurt Zouma – got elevated to the House of Lords by her guffawing chum David Cameron in spite of claiming to “have no interest in politics.” She also likes bumping fists with Carrie Johnson’s puppet, Boris.

“Very Unkind” Rachel Johnson’s Most Ridiculous Remarks

Aside from once rightly suggesting her brother, Prime Minister Boris Johnson, uses the despatch box of the House of Commons as a “bully pulpit” and once condemned some of his speeches as “highly reprehensible,” journalist Rachel Johnson often gets rather carred away. Amongst her odd most ridiculous remarks are:

On boozy lockdown breaking parties in Downing Street:

“I didn’t see much of the Prime Minister and his family during lockdown, but the times I did see him, he was completely compliant: he dotted every ‘I,’ he crossed every ‘T.’”

“If it was rule of six, there were six. And what I didn’t see were all the things you’ve been reading about.”

“To my mind, if he did go out into the Downing Street garden – and he’s told us he did – for him, that would have been work. He may have had a drink, I don’t know. Is that one of the key questions? But that would have been work.”

“For example, at his birthday, it was me, my three brothers, Carrie and Wilf. That was six people. And I have to tell you something about my brother’s character.”

“You’ve been seeing the front pages which couldn’t have been worse: suitcases of booze going into Downing Street from the Co-op.”

“I can tell you from the bottom of my heart that he has never once turned to me or any member of my family and said: ‘I tell you what, let’s have an office party’ or: ‘I tell you what, let’s have a party.’”

“If anything, he would say: ‘Let’s play reading,’ when we were growing up, or even in our twenties, or: ‘Let’s play, who can memorise the most poems from the Oxford book of verse’’ And, of course, it was always him.”

“Look, I’m just telling you what I saw over lockdown and what I know of my brother’s character.”

On her own character:

“Of course, I’m naughty.”

“Without my Johnson trademark mop of yellow hair, I think I would be nothing.”

On politicians:

“If you tell the truth you get into trouble and that’s why politicians are extremely dull.”

On the sex trafficker and daughter of a thieving murderer Ghislaine Maxwell:

“It’s hard not to feel a batsqueak of pity for Ghislaine Maxwell.”

On food and coffee:

“In Germany, salads are assemblies of ham and mayonnaise.”

“I am a total coffee snob and bore. If anyone makes the mistake of offering me ‘a coffee’ they tend to regret it. I’m worse than Mariah Carey and the hot milk rider is completely non-negotiable.”

On her work:

“I used to sit at home in my tracksuit bottoms and the real excitement of my day would be going out to get a copy of Private Eye and a latte.”

“It’s often discouraging sitting working at home, wondering whether to put the heating on, answering the doorbell to the gas board, feeling it’s all utterly pointless.”

“The Lady [which she was the 9^th editor of between 2009 and 2013] is a piddling little magazine that no one cares about or buys.”

On what others think of her:

“I’m worried about looking like a bad person… I don’t like the public image I’ve been dressed with and it worries me.”

“When I’m called unkind, that really cuts to the quick. You can say anything else that you like about me.”

“I don’t mind being called snobbish, a pain and a social climber, but being called unkind really hurts.”

February 14, 2022
Flipping Randy Andy’s Bathtub Bonk Pad
WORLD EXCLUSIVE – Ghislaine Maxwell’s Belgravia bonk pad – where Prince Andrew allegedly shockingly had it off with Virginia Roberts in the bath in 2001 – is relisted for £2.6 million just months after it sold for £1.75 million in April 2021; we share the first ever seen photos of that famous tub and ask: “Does its presence add value?”

Everybody in the world has now seen the infamous snapshot of Prince Andrew with his chubby fingers wrapped around the waist of his alleged victim Virginia Roberts at the Belgravia home of Ghislaine Maxwell in 2001. Nobody has ever discredited that photograph and nobody has proven that the bathtub in the bathroom that adjoined the first floor landing where they were snapped was anything other than a full-sized 5-foot-6-inches long.

Everyone in the world has also seen the floorplan of the first floor of Miss Maxwell’s former London home, but now, today, The Steeple Times can exclusively share an image of that very bathtub in which the lady now known as Virginia Giuffre claims the Duke of York supposedly had sexual relations with her on 10^th March 2001. That still unrenovated home, 44 Kinnerton Street, is now on the market for the sum of £2.6 million – a sum £850,000 higher than it sold for less than a year ago.

Whilst everybody in the world now knows that the now convicted mucky madam daughter of the pension pot plunderer Robert Maxwell faked a photo of herself at an In-N-Out burger joint in August 2019, photographs of the now somewhat tired bathroom in London, SW1 prove it to be a space where two people could easily have cavorted. In sharing them, they show Prince Andrew’s porky pies for exactly what they are. Two people could very easily have fitted into that rotten tub.

Offered by an exotically named firm of real estate hawkers who go by the name of Wellbelove Quested, the 1,573 square foot, three-storey former home of the mucky madam Miss Maxwell is marketed as “charming” and having “plenty of potential.” It is described as “requiring updating,” but unsurprisingly no mention is made as to its tawdry past. A photograph of the very bath where ‘Randy Andy’ allegedly bonked on that fateful night bizarrely features in the marketing material, but somewhat more carefully imagery of the landing area has been left out.

Asked by The Steeple Times for comment, a leading local estate agent – whom wished to remain off the record – remarked:

“Any previous sale at either £1.45 million or £1.75 million seems suspiciously low. At £1,653 per square foot today, it sounds about right in terms of an asking price, although some buyers might be deterred by The Nags Head being so close.”

“As for the activity that may have gone on inside there, I am of the view it adds a bit of interest to the marketing, but neither adds to nor detracts from the value.”

“Equally, now I see these pictures, it looks to me that Prince Andrew, Ghislaine Maxwell and Virginia Roberts were all standing in the doorway of the front bedroom of the first floor that day. It begs the question: ‘Why?’”

Contacted earlier in the day by a reader of The Steeple Times who alerted us to the sale subsequently, Andrew Quested of Wellbelove Quested somewhat lackadaisically opined in response via email:

“My clients made a good purchase. I think you will find a lot of properties have a past resident that is not always good… I do understand your thoughts [about the links to Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein and the Duke of York], but these things pass.”

Occasional contributor to The Steeple Times Jack Hine, however, took a different view. When approached Friday, the Hove, Sussex and Belgravia, London based dealer in vintage memorabilia stated:

“That bath, whatever it’s murky heritage, has royal pedigree and it’s got a grimy, unrestored appearance. ‘Where there’s muck, there’s bloody brass,’ I say.”

“There’s always going to be ghouls out there with a desire for such, so I advise whoever buys 44 Kinnerton Street to most certainly not to put what could become one of the most costly bathtubs in history ever in the skip.”

“Prince Andrew’s antics in this tub may well cost him well north of £10 million and I’d suggest that the new owner of this house will get tens of thousands for that tawdry tub. I’d definitely put in a bid.”

This photograph of the first floor bathroom at 44 Kinnerton Street, Belgravia proves one thing – those that said that the tub is too small for two are nothing but loopy liars.

When asked about what occured on the night of 10th March 2001 in the first floor bathroom at her Kinnerton Street mews house, Ghislaine Maxwell responded: “[Virginia Roberts] then characterized [sic] things took place in my bathroom in the bathtub itself. The tub is too small for any kind of activity whatsoever.” The picture of that very same tub used in marketing material by Wellbelove Quested proves exactly to the contrary.

The floor plan shared by the likes ‘The Daily Mail’ and ‘The Sun suggested the first floor bathroom at the house to be 7-foot, 4 inches by 7-foot, 2-inches. Floor plans shared by Wellboved Quested suggest that the room is actually 8-foot, 4-inches by 8-foot, 2-inches. There was most definitely plenty of room for two…

Why did they stand on the first floor landing when the only entertaining areas were downstairs? Were they progressing upwards? Was Ghislaine Maxwell leading her friend Prince Andrew and a concubine to a bedroom? Who took the photograph? Many questions remain unanswered, but it’s now clear that the bathtub could easily have fitted two.

A floorplan of 44 Kinnerton Street, Belgravia. In it, mucky madam Ghislaine Maxwell’s home is clearly shown to be a place where ‘public’ entertaining took place on the ground floor, whilst ‘extracurricular’ activities took place on the upper two floors.

These photographs of 44 Kinnerton Street, taken in July 2021, provide proof that the bannisters seen in the March 2001 photographs remain inside said property. The setting in which Prince Andrew and Virginia Roberts were captured was indeed most definitely genuine. In the same month, the new owners of the property displayed a poster at 44 Kinnerton Street for a festival that was to be held in East Anglia from 31st July 2021 to 1st August 2021. The event, the EA Festival, was hosted at Hedingham Castle – home to Jason and Demetra Lindsay – in Essex and had a line-up that included model and advocate Arizona Muse, film director Mike Figgis, ‘Countdown’s’ Susie Dent, sex commentator Rowan Pelling and comedian Josh Berry. The same open doorway also showed something else… The very same bannister that was shown in the photograph Prince Andrew, Virginia Robert and Ghislaine Maxwell appeared in.

In November 2020, ‘The Steeple Times’ featured bathtub mats featuring Prince Andrew’s face and the caption “nonce” that were available for sale through Redbubble.com. Priced then at £23.61 ($32.30, €28.29 or درهم118.61), these 61cm by 43cm polyester microfiber items clearly proved very popular as they are no longer on the site. Clearly, there is a market for bathtub memorabilia that references the Queen’s supposed favourite son.

The Names & Numbers – ‘Mucky Madam Ghislaine Maxwell’s Bathtub Bonk Pad’ – 44 Kinnerton Street, Belgravia, London, SW1X 8ES, United Kingdom
- 14^th January 2022 – Property website TheMoveMarket.com values the house at £2.11 million ($2.88 million, €2.53 million or درهم59 million), a sum 19% lower than the current asking price for the unrenovated property.
- January 2022 – Estate agents Wellbelove Quested offer the mews house for £2.6 million ($3.6 million, €3.1 million or درهم1 million), an extraordinary increase of 49% on the sale price just 270 days earlier. The house is offered on a lease of 127 years that commenced on 24^th June 2014 and previously on their website Wellbelove Quested had marketed the house for a higher price of £2.75 million ($3.738 million, €3.283 million or درهم13.731 million).
- July 2021 – The Steeple Times reports on repainting work to the outside of the house being underway. An open door reveals the infamous staircase bannister to still be in-situ.
- 19^th April 2021 – Records confirm the house to have been sold for £1.75 million ($2.39 million, €2.09 million or درهم79 million).
- March 2021 – Ghislaine Maxwell’s lawyer offered cash from the “pending sale of her £1.45 million ($2 million, €1.74 million or درهم28 million)” home as part of a package when they sought bail for the mucky madam for a third time, the Daily Mail reported. This sum was 44% lower than the September 2020 asking price and 400% higher than the January 1997 purchase price.
- March 2021 – A Knightsbridge estate agent told The Steeple Times: “Knowing the street as I do, 44 is one of the smaller houses which I assume it to be a little over 1,000 square foot in size. Depending on the condition, I estimate the freehold value to be circa £1.8 million to £2 million ($2.5 million to $2.7 million, €2.2 million to €2.4 million or 9درهم million to درهم10 million).”
- December 2020 – Members of the Maxwell family attempted to raise finance on the property but are not successful, The Steeple Times learns from a financier with connections to the Maxwell family and their representatives. They were rejected, were rejected on the basis of the “toxicity” of their familial name.
- September 2020 – Estate agents Aylesford list 44 Kinnerton Street for sale for £2.6 million ($3.6 million, €3.1 million or درهم1 million) on (it was claimed) a freehold basis, a sum 797% than the January 1997 purchase price. They subsequently later reduce the asking price to £2.1 million ($2.9 million, €2.5 million or درهم10.5 million) “according to a leading property expert.”
- August 2019 – According to Insider, a woman with “long hair [who] appeared to be in her 60s” was seen entering the property. She “denied that the socialite owns or lived in the house, claiming instead that the elusive socialite lived elsewhere down the street.”
- 10^th March 2001 – Prince Andrew allegedly had sexual relations with 17-year-old Virginia Roberts in a bathroom in the property. He continues to deny this occurred whilst claiming that a photograph of himself with Miss Roberts and Ghislaine Maxwell on the first floor of building is a fake also.
- 22^nd January 1997 – Ghislaine Maxwell paid £290,000 ($396,000, €347,000 or درهم5 million) for the three-storey leasehold mews house. It is situated at the heart of the Duke of Westminster’s Grosvenor Estate.
- 1989 to 1995 – Ghislaine Maxwell is known to have resided at 69 Stanhope Mews East, South Kensington, London, SW7 5QT. Her father bought it for her two years before his mysterious death and she reportedly “groomed and befriended Minor Victim 3 in London, England, between approximately 1994 and 1995… Maxwell introduced Minor Victim 3 to Epstein and during those interactions, Maxwell encouraged Minor Victim 3 to massage Epstein, knowing that Epstein would engage in sex acts with Minor Victim 3. During those massages, Epstein sexually abused Minor Victim 3” at that very property. It was sold for £267,000 ($365,000, €320,000 or درهم3 million) on 15^th March 1995 and then again for £1.75 million ($2.39 million, €2.10 million or درهم8.77 million) on 30^th August 2019.
And finally… Some other images of the ‘Mucky Madam’s’ crib

The ground floor sitting room has a somewhat sadistic quality about it. Rather like a doctor or dentist’s waiting room in its styling, here is a room where the mucky madam no doubt just prepped her victims for their prey upstairs. How many chairs does one need for such a purpose?

This place is anything but homely. It is, in fact, scary.

A kitchen that wasn’t for a coffee and a chat; a kitchen where saintly types like Delia Smith and Mary Berry most definitely don’t belong. Ghislaine Maxwell is personified as a woman as clinical to her core.

The mucky mistresses’ master bedroom. God only f$%king knows went on in this creepy crib.

Another supposedly innocent looking room that was likely a torture chamber.

The bedroom Andrew, Ghislaine and Virginia posed next to. It is currently set up as an extra sitting room rather conveniently, but doesn’t look like a place anyone has bothered or would even to sit.

The house even has a roof terrace. It looks f$%ing rotten, just like its former owner, mucky madam Ghislaine Maxwell, daughter of murdering pension pot plunderer Robert Maxwell.

And finally, back to that bloody bathroom… It even has double shower. It’s hardly small, is it? It’s perfectly feasible that Prince Andrew and Virginia Roberts could have very easily fitted in there also.
January 15, 2022
What, first, Peter Mandelson, was it that attracted you to the multi-millionaire Jeffrey Epstein?

After ‘The Sun’ publishes a previously unseen photograph of pompous ‘Prince of Darkness’ Peter Mandelson at a birthday bash for croaked paedophile Jeffrey Epstein in Paris, it is time for Sir Keir Starmer to respond to the petition calling for the peer’s suspension from Labour whilst an investigation is carried out

Proudly “pompous” ‘Prince of Darkness’ Peter Mandelson’s proximity to the prolific paedophile Jeffrey Epstein was first featured on our pages back in June 2020. Now, after The Sun shared a previously unseen photo of the pair together in Paris, calls for Sir Keir Starmer to suspend the peer from Labour whilst an investigation is carried out into how deep their involvement went is again attracting attention.

In the image – taken circa 20^th January 2007 in Epstein’s £10.025 million ($13.525 million, €11.900 million or درهم49.670 million) Parisian paedo pad AFTER the lover and associate of Ghislaine Maxwell had been charged with soliciting a woman for prostitution in August 2006 – the pair are seen with diminutive butler Valdson Viera Cotrin celebrating the financier’s birthday.

Pictured in a hoodie in his dining room blowing out candles is Epstein whilst ‘Mandy’ – whom features in the now infamous ‘black book’ we believe belonged to Ghislaine Maxwell with 10 phone numbers attributed – gawps onwards rather over-enthusiastically, a glass of red wine in front of him. The pair look perfectly at ease together, in spite of the fact that various newspapers had already reported on the horrific allegations against the Brooklyn born taxi driver turned teacher turned financier.

As published previously in The Steeple Times, Lord Mandelson – at the time the European Union Trade Commissioner – holidayed with Epstein just months before the latter’s arrest in 2005 on St Barts. The two “middle-aged holidaymakers” were photographed in a fashion boutique where the former was snapped trying on a white belt whilst wearing his £21,000 ($28,500, €25,200 or درهم104,800) Patek Phillipe watch – which the Daily Mail pointedly noted to be worth “almost two months of hism post-tax income”). Opposite him, his clear ‘mate’ Epstein is captured giggling.

The key ‘classic question’ Lord Mandelson now needs to answer is a paraphrasing of that put to decidedly dippy Debbie McGee by the late Caroline Ahern (in her role as the bonkers but brilliant ‘Mrs Merton’) in 1997: “What, first, Peter, was it that attracted you to the multi-millionaire Jeffrey Epstein?”

To join the 1,500 people who have already signed the petition calling on Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer “to SUSPEND Peter Mandelson’s membership of the party while ordering an independent investigation into the extent of Mandelson’s historical involvement in the sex trafficking, paedophilia and sexual blackmail enterprise of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell,” click here.

The latest picture – featured in ‘The Sun’ shows Jeffrey Epstein living it up with Peter Mandelson at his Paris paedo pad. Whilst Lord Mandelson may or may not have seen newspaper reports about the arrest of his ‘chum’ months earlier, one is left questioning the standard of his judgment in hanging around with this subsequently convicted nonce.

The setting of the picture is clearly the dining room of the apartment and the man in the middle of the previous picture is most definitely identifiable as the butler of the house, Valdson Viera Cotrin (pictured munching away at the same table, top).

As we’ve said of entries in the address book often misattributed to Jeffrey Epstein, which we instead believe is primarily the contacts of mucky madam Ghislaine Maxwell, The Right Honourable The Lord Mandelson PC is someone closer to this deviant duo than most. With TEN phone numbers for him and his partner since 1998, Reinaldo Avila da Silva, this is someone who they clearly had regular contact with.

Oxford educated Peter Mandelson (St Catherine’s College, 1973 to 1976, pictured with Matthew Freud) and Oxford educated Ghislaine Maxwell (Balliol College, graduated 1985, pictured with Rupert Murdoch) are connected in multiple ways. Of the pension pot plundering ‘Bouncing Czech,’ the Labour peer once remarked: “It was very strange because you’d simultaneously want to be at Maxwell’s parties and at the same time shrink away from him. Because he was such a bully and so unpredictable. To be honest, I was frightened of his company. He had that ability to make you feel completely small and inadequate, and that just scrambled my head.”

The Seven Questions Lord Mandelson Ought To Answer

Accompanying her iPetition, Petra Malkovich asks seven questions. They are:

1. In January 2009, Peter Mandelson called Jeffrey Epstein in the Palm Beach Stockade (jail) that Mr. Epstein had inhabited after pleading guilty to procuring a minor for sexual abuse. This phone conversation was reported by UK national broadcaster Channel 4 on the Dispatches programme aired in October 2019.

During the phone call, Mandelson sought Epstein’s assistance to set up a meeting with Jamie Dimon of JP Morgan bank. The sex offender referred to Mandelson by a nickname (‘Petie’) during the conversation.

“I must say I was astonished that a British cabinet minister at that time, probably the most powerful man other than the Prime Minister, was calling Jeffrey in jail to make an appointment, to seek an appointment with a very powerful banker in New York,” the whistle-blower told Dispatches.

How can it be justified that Lord Mandelson called a convicted child abuser in jail?

2. In 2012, Peter Mandelson declared in a statement posted on the website of the TerraMar Project, an ostensible charity set up by Ghislaine Maxwell with financial support from Jeffrey Epstein, that he was “supporting” Ms. Maxwell’s organisation. U.S. law enforcement contend that the TerraMar Project was a fake charity slush fund for victims of Maxwell-and-Epstein’s sex trafficking operation.

How can it be justified that Lord Mandelson publicly supported Ghislaine Maxwell’s alleged ‘fake charity slush fund’ for victims of sex trafficking?

3. On December 27^th 2005, Peter Mandelson took part in a shopping trip with Jeffrey Epstein in Saint Barthélemys (photos published by the Daily Mail on August 30^th 2019).

Peter Mandelson by this time had “known [Jeffrey Epstein] for several years, having previously once visited his Caribbean island for a holiday – when neither Epstein nor any of the girls were there,” the Daily Mail reported. Mandelson’s partner was also present for the earlier visit, according to eyewitness Cathy Alexander.

How can it be justified that Lord Mandelson socialised in person and discussed business in person with Jeffrey Epstein on multiple occasions [refer also to the events below]?

4. On a date falling after August 2006 and before June 30^th 2008, Lord Mandelson paid a social visit to Jeffrey Epstein at the sex trafficker’s mansion in Paris [see the photo above].

At some point during this rendezvous in Paris of unknown duration, Mandelson and Epstein celebrated a birthday together – seemingly Epstein’s (Epstein was born on January 20^th, which could point to the photo having been taken in either January 2007 or January 2008).

Epstein and Mandelson were joined for this birthday celebration by an as-yet-unnamed individual described in the press as an Epstein “staff member.”

How can it be justified that Lord Mandelson socialised with Jeffrey Epstein at the sex trafficker’s Paris residence after Epstein had already been charged with a sex crime (procuring a woman for prostitution)?

5. In March 2011 Virginia Roberts (now Virginia Giuffre) told the Mail on Sunday that Peter Mandelson had visited Jeffrey Epstein at his New York townhouse near Central Park, attending a dinner party with the sex trafficker. “I assumed they were in business together,” she recalled.

How can it be justified that Lord Mandelson socialised and/or discussed business with Jeffrey Epstein in the same building from which Mr Epstein was operating his sex trafficking, paedophilia and blackmail operation with Ghislaine Maxwell, with minors routinely sexually assaulted on the premises by Mr Epstein?

6. In January 2001 Peter Mandelson joined his friend Kevin Spacey at the Old Vic theatre in London, becoming an Associate Director in or before this date (Daily Telegraph, January 5 2001). Spacey had joined the board of the Old Vic Theatre Trust 2000 just a few weeks earlier, in November 2000.

In 2002, Ghislaine Maxwell, another of Mr. Spacey’s close friends, accompanied the Hollywood star on a private tour of Buckingham Palace led by Prince Andrew. Mr. Spacey was using his tenure at the Old Vic to serially sexually assault young actors – at least 20 – with most of the allegations relating to the period up to 2009.

How can it be explained that Lord Mandelson was so closely involved with Kevin Spacey and the Old Vic during the period of widespread sexual abuse concerned, yet encountered no reports of these recurring serious sexual abuse episodes involving his friend and colleague?

7. In or before 2013, Peter Mandelson was brought on to the board of the Alfred Herrhausen Society of Deutsche Bank, according to a July 14 2013 report in ‘Der Spiegel’ of Germany. The report identified Anshu Jain as the executive responsible for Mandelson’s appointment. Deutsche Bank executives approved Jeffrey Epstein as a client in 2013 and then kept working with him.

“[In 2013] Deutsche Bank was aggressively expanding its U.S. wealth management business under its new co-chief executive, Anshu Jain… Deutsche Bank executives ignored repeated red flags, including suspiciously large cash withdrawals and 120 wire transfers totaling $2.65 million to women with Eastern European surnames,” the New York Times reported.

Subsequently, Mr Jain “was forced to step down from the top job at Deutsche Bank after a series of regulatory mishaps.” In 2017 Mr Jain was hired by Jeffrey Epstein’s next-door-neighbour, Howard Lutnick of Cantor Fitzgerald, whose sister, Edie Lutnick, was (in common with Mandelson) a prominent self-declared supporter of Ghislaine Maxwell’s ‘TerraMar Project’ charity.

How can it be explained that Lord Mandelson was closely involved at Deutsche Bank with the rogue DB executive who was financially enabling Jeffrey Epstein in the exact same period?

In 1997, the late Caroline Ahern (in her role as the bonkers but brilliant ‘Mrs Merton’) jokingly asked the dippy wife of the late magician Paul Daniels: “What, first, Debbie, was it that attracted you to the multi-millionaire Paul Daniels?” This question now needs to be asked of a certain Labour peer and his relationship with the croaked Labour donor Robert Maxwell’s deviant daughter and her since croaked ex-lover Jeffrey Epstein.

January 10, 2022
Beecher ‘Barks’ (Well, Actually ‘Whimpers’) Back

Mucky madam Ghislaine Maxwell’s wannabe mouthpiece Jay Beecher barks, well whimpers, to ‘The Steeple Times’ on behalf of the convicted criminal sex offender

Jay Beecher has long been an attention seeking arse-licker and with his latest missive to The Steeple Times, received at 7:37am this morning, he’s yet again proved himself as nothing but a soppy sap.

First, in the mid 2010s, this noxious nitwit – whose only known limited company was curiously dissolved in March 2021 – turned his attention to UKIP. Then, when he was suspended by that ragbag of rotters for “using his time to attack people in his party rather than to build up support,” in September 2016, he hotfooted it over to the Tories – a party that clearly didn’t bother to do any due diligence.

Subsequently fined for driving whilst disqualified, driving with no insurance and having no MOT on his car whilst standing as a Conservative candidate in a by-election for Peterborough Council in June 2017, Beecher didn’t make any kind of apology. Instead, he pathetically blubbed: “This is a personal matter. It was a misunderstanding. It won’t affect me going forward.” That day, the violins most definitely played.

Continuing the theme of associating with failure and freaks, Beecher sidled further to the right next by getting himself involved with Politicalite – a much derided website that has published the works of the far-right, anti-Islam leader of For Britain and associate of convicted criminal Tommy Robinson, Anne Marie Waters.

In a somewhat sloppy and slovenly style, this vexatious and vain individual was able to share content on Politicalite that included not only praising a statement by Waters as “strong” and “nail-on-the-head” in her approach, but it is where also he started banging on about grooming and voter fraud. In calling anyone he didn’t like “absolute morons, lol [sic]” there, he also illustrated that literary genius most definitely emanates from his self-proclaimed “investigative journalist’s” somewhat addled mind.

Apparently, things haven’t worked out well for Politicalite – whose homepage has now been reduced to putting out clearly paid for ‘features’ on behalf of Heart Bingo and claims about being “silenced” rather than sharing anything political – and so, in recent months, Beecher moved his energies towards trying to become a mini-me of PR peddler Brian Basham and established another website. He hasn’t achieved anything close to one per cent of the man known only for his involvement in ‘Dirty Tricks’ thus far in column inches as part of this bonkers endeavour.

On the especially amateurishly presented The Maxwell Files, Beecher has offered up total claptrap about the case of the incarcerated sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell and sought to share information damaging about victims this clearly evil woman has now been convincingly convicted of abusing. He does so without merit and, as ever is the case with this wretched piece of toerag, yet again shows himself as desperate to elevate himself to a position in the public eye. Now, today, though he’s blocked us on Twitter in true Cowardy Custard fashion, he this morning sent through a missive. In it, this clear wack job whinged:

“A false statement to claim people ‘haven’t heard a word from me’ since the verdict – I’ve been speaking about it, tweeting about it, and writing about it every day, and have been mentioned in the Daily Mirror and others. As too have the others you mention. But one can’t expect anything less than demonstrable lies to be printed on blog site The Steeple Times.”

Continuing, lonesome lunatic Beecher finished:

“This website is hilarious – a blog written by a creepy bloke whom no-one has heard of, who works with conspiracy numpty Shaun Attwood (recently exposed as having promoted lies about the Epstein case), and whose vocabulary is so limited he regurgitates lines such as ‘mucky madam’ a million times; each time no doubt chortling to himself alone in his grimy flat as he punches each letter into his sticky keyboard.”

“The fact that this website’s disclaimer clearly states that it prints ‘fake news,’ just adds to the hilarity, and the irrelevance of its non-entity owner.”

Whilst clearly penned by a pugnacious person whose brain has obviously been tossed around in a wok ten times too many, it might do Jay Beecher well to focus on another matter outstanding – that of the libel case brought against him by the esteemed writer of Waking the Dead and co-founder of Byline Times Peter Jukes.

A crowdfunder supporting Mr Jukes – a decent and principled gent disgracefully defamed in Politicalite and elsewhere online in June 2021 – has already raised nearly £57,000 in pledges. Today, again, we remind readers of The Steeple Times to support this effort to root out the cancerous poison spread by the likes of Jay Beecher and today we call out him and others supporting the deviant daughter of the pension pot plundering murderer Robert Maxwell.

Pictured top – In November 2020, Jay Beecher shared a photo of himself “minglin’” with the “ultimate neighbour from hell” Priti Patel on Twitter. One of his ‘fans’ responded: “Gorgeous couple.” It’s no wonder they get on given the “neighbour from hell” Home Secretary likes “snitchin’ and bullyin’” just like him.

In September 2016, Jay Beecher – a prattling pillock who blocks anyone who dares call him out on Twitter – issued what he called a “long statement” – take that to mean a pyramid of piffle and a deluge of drivel – about his “great party” UKIP had become a “mates club” controlled by the likes of Arron Banks (“who use our party as his plaything”). He claimed “poisonous elements” were trying to destroy the ragbag “from within” and subsequently a spokesman for the party stated: “Mr Beecher has been suspended after repeatedly making deliberate and demonstratively false allegations against other members of the party, and doing so to various media outlets.” Now, after trying all manner of other avenues as part of his fame seeking, he’s latched himself onto the croaked paedophile Jeffrey Epstein’s now also convicted sex offender, Ghislaine Maxwell. Talk about desperate; talk about pathetic and you’ll most certainly have to talk about Jay Beecher.

‘Politicalite’ – a warped organ for which Jay Beecher penned a series of drivel between 2018 and 2021 – announced on the 16th December that it was “taking an extended break due to personal family reasons and will be back in the New Year.” On the 30th December, after sharing a clearly paid for “don’t miss” puff piece about Heart Bingo and how bingo is “trendy” and “getting bigger” on Boxing Day – without labelling it as such – the online rag’s founder Jordan James announced: “Politicalite is back in January 2022 and promises in-depth investigations, big exclusives, entertainment exclusives and big stories that matter from across the UK, including a very ‘BIG’ surprise.”

Author, screenwriter, playwright and journalist Peter Jukes has attracted huge support for a crowdfunder to support his libel action against others Jay Beecher. We urge readers to join those who’ve back it already.

January 7, 2022
Murky Maxwell, Vexatious Vine, & Rabid Rachel

Matthew Steeples calls out those who’ve tried to excuse “murky” Ghislaine Maxwell – most especially ‘journalists’ Sarah Vine and Rachel Johnson – and lauds those who’ve joined him in demanding the mucky madam no longer be called a “socialite”

Some of those who came out ‘in support’ or at least ‘in sympathy’ for Ghislaine Maxwell prior to her having been confirmed last week as nothing but a “convicted sex offender,” have unsurprisingly gone quiet. Others, including allegedly even her own husband Scott Borgerson, it seems, have unceremoniously ditched her.

Of these peoples’ views of croaked paedophile Jeffrey Epstein’s one-time lover, one or two have rather conveniently changed their minds and then there’s the case of two Tory tattling Daily Mail hacks – Rachel Johnson and Sarah Vine.

On 14^th November, Vine – the soon ex-wife-to-be of the “loose cannon, nutter” Labour to Tory transplant The Rt. Hon. Michael Gove MP – penned a column in which she banged on about how “Maxwell [was] not a live threat to others” and claimed she needed to “be treated with respect and humanity.” She showed her sympathy for this wicked woman’s plight and in doing so belittled the mucky madam’s victims.

Now, today, Vine has returned to the topic and – whilst avoiding taking stance on what punishment should be given out – noted: “It’s not the obvious Freudian aspects of Ghislaine’s life that I find most interesting. It’s what her trial tells us about the world in which we once lived – and the one in which we live today.”

Peddling herself as some kind of expert on high society in spite of having no known connection with such a world, comprehensive school educated Vine – a woman once mocked by fellow Tory MP wife Sophie Swire as laughably lowbrow and “lumbered with cooking all the food” whilst “bending over backwards to please the Camerons” – continued:

“Quite simply, it wasn’t just Ghislaine who was on trial in that New York courtroom, but an entire culture. A culture where wealth, privilege and power gave people permission to do whatever to whomever whenever they wanted, without fear of consequences… A culture that, when all is said and done, was rotten to the core.”

Turning to another topic, that of Brigitte Macron being outed as potentially transgender, Vine again brought up Maxwell and pointedly began with the words: “Madame Macron’s real murky past…” She concluded: “What does disturb me, especially in the light of the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, is the idea that [Macron] allegedly seduced her future husband when he was just 15 and she 39.”

In using the word “murky” of a lady subjected to what are apparently completely untrue rumours, vexatiously vicious Vine has yet again shown herself as someone who likes to have a pop at clearly wronged people like Madame Macron whilst excusing someone genuinely “murky” like Ghislaine Maxwell. It does her no favours and is yet again proof that it is time for this supporter of the reintroduction of the death penalty to be sent off to journalistic Siberia. Her ice cold manner might actually go down a bit there, after all.

Known for her especially vicious tongue, Sarah Vine (pictured here with her now estranged husband, Michael Gove) doesn’t like “the persistent bile and vitriol aimed at MPs across various social media channels such as Facebook and Twitter [as it] eggs on sick individuals, encouraging and – perhaps most importantly – [enabling] abusive and dangerous behaviour.” Today, she didn’t offer similar sympathy to the victims of Jeffrey Epstein’s co-conspirator, but instead banged on about high society and how its changing – a topic she clearly has no qualification to offer any kind of opinion on.

Though Sarah Vine called for the reintroduction of the death penalty in November 2021, she doesn’t seem to want to commit to supporting any kind of punishment for Ghislaine Maxwell; instead, today, she prefers to pick on Brigitte Macron and bring up a clearly ‘fake news’ story that ludicrously alleges that the French President’s wife is transgender. Shame on this preposterous, poisonous pen of clearly warped mind once described as having “the moral sure-footedness of an alleycat on a trampoline.”

Rachel Johnson (pictured with her brother Prime Minister Boris Johnson) is well known for being ridiculous and perhaps a little beyond bonkers. Her writing style has been described as “chummy burbling” and her gaffes have included “joking” that Rupert Murdoch told her brother to “kill” the BBC. Of that the fool later wrote: “Sorry to disappoint but Rupert Murdoch NEVER told the PM to get rid of the BBC as I am quoted as saying in today’s ‘Daily Mail.’ It never happened. Joke taken out of context. Totally my fault for agreeing to say ‘a few words’ about the future of the media. Apols to all who got excited.”

Remaining remarkably quiet on the other hand at this time, Boris Johnson’s sister and sometime colleague of Sarah Vine at the Daily Mail, Rachel, has yet to come out with her thoughts on the verdict and victims in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial.

Known for having more front than Harrods and a megaphone in place of a mouth, Ms. Johnson ludicrously expressed “pity” for Ghislaine Maxwell in The Spectator in November.

At the time, she went all “jolly hockey sticks” and was slammed after stating:

“It’s hard not to feel a batsqueak of pity for Ghislaine Maxwell – 500 days and counting in solitary confinement.”

“I intersected briefly with her at Oxford. As a fresher I wandered into Balliol JCR one day in search of its subsidised breakfast granola-and-Nescafé offering and found a shiny glamazon with naughty eyes holding court astride a table, a high-heeled boot resting on my brother Boris’s thigh.”

“She gave me a pitying glance but I did manage to snag an invite to her party in Headington Hill Hall – even though I wasn’t in the same college as her and Boris. I have a memory of her father, Bob, coming out in a towelling robe and telling us all to go home.”

“I’m sure fairweather friends would not reveal they went to a Ghislaine Maxwell party: as Barbara Amiel’s brilliant memoir Friends and Enemies proves, you only know who your real chums are when you’re in the gutter.”

Now, unsurprisingly, with only the prospect perhaps of an invite to Miss Maxwell’s penitentiary facility rather than a society party, Ms. Johnson will now have to go the same way as she did after calling the Duchess of Sussex “exotic.” Apologising for that particular gaffe, the journalist admitted in January 2018: “It didn’t go down well and I hereby apologise Harry” and now, we call on her to do the same to the victims of the convicted criminal Ghislaine Maxwell.

Elsewhere, in an opinion piece in today’s The Guardian, Joan Smith was one columnist, however, who got it right when she echoed my own sentiments – expressed on Thursday in an article titled: “Ghislaine Maxwell – From ‘Seasoned Socialite’ to ‘Sordid Sex Trafficker’” – and stated: “Let’s call Ghislaine Maxwell what she is – a sex trafficker, not a socialite.”

Going further, Smith summed up this wicked woman perfectly in three paragraphs. Of the deviant daughter of ‘The Bouncing Czech,’ she remarked:

“Predators have a sixth sense when it comes to choosing co-conspirators. Maxwell was a grown woman when she met Epstein… It must have occurred to Maxwell by now that the two men she put absolute faith in, her father and her ex-lover, both left her to face the music after their apparent suicides. And for what?”

“The columnist Barbara Amiel, who is married to the former newspaper magnate Conrad Black, recalls a conversation that shows Maxwell in an unexpected and highly unflattering light. ‘I bet I’m in charge of more lavatories and bathrooms than you are,’ Maxwell suddenly said as the two women were walking along a beach. While Amiel thought about it, Maxwell reminded her to include those on planes. ‘Thirty-nine,’ said Amiel and Maxwell’s face lit up. ‘I win,’ she exclaimed.”

“Questions about Maxwell’s relationship with Epstein have now been cleared up. She procured girls for him and it speaks volumes about her moral compass, or lack of it, that she evidently cared more about the number of lavatories in his mansions than the vulnerable teenagers she exposed to sexual assault and rape.”

January 2, 2022
6pm Ghislaine
Jury in alleged mucky madam Ghislaine Maxwell trial asked to consider deliberating until 6pm – one hour later than usual; probably because Judge Alison J. Nathan is ready to get on with her next chapter in her life courtesy of President Joe Biden

The patience of Judge Alison J. Nathan – a woman clearly desperate to get on with her next stage in life after being promoted to a higher court by President Joe Biden – has clearly yet again been tested as she awaits a verdict from the jury in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial in New York.

After previously having had a mini-meltdown with the deviant daughter of the pension pot plunderer Robert Maxwell’s lawyers after they tried to get extra time to get their witnesses to show up in spite of having had over 500 days to prepare them, Judge Nathan yesterday asked jurors in the case to consider sitting an extra hour beyond their normal 5pm closing time.

Clearly and most apparently sick of them asking questions focused on details such as the definition of the word “enticement” – which she summed up to mean “to attract, induce or lure using hope or desire” – Judge Nathan pointedly added of her 6pm suggestion: “I don’t mean to pressure you in any way. You should take all the time that you need.” Hammer down, “Next!”

The case against Ghislaine Maxwell

The late ‘Cap’n Bob’s’ deviant daughter Ghislaine Maxwell is on trial before Judge Alison J. Nathan on counts of:
- Conspiracy to entice minors to travel to engage in illegal sex acts.
- Enticement of a minor to travel to engage in illegal sex acts.
- Conspiracy to transport minors with intent to engage in criminal sexual activity.
- Transporting a minor with the intent to engage in criminal sexual activity.
- Sex trafficking conspiracy.
- Sex trafficking of a minor.
- Lying under oath (to be heard separately at a later date).
Ghislaine Maxwell failed to get her 81-year-old former neighbour in Kinnerton Street, Belgravia, the publican Kevin Moran, into court to testify for her as he could not turn up in New York in suitable time to appear Judge Nathan. Out of her 35 proposed witnesses, only 9 actually gave evidence in support of the wicked wastrel wench.

60-year-old since Christmas Day Ghislaine Maxwell has managed to get her brothers and sisters including Kevin, Ian and Isabel (pictured right) to turn up to support her at her trial in New York. Her husband since 2016, Scott Borgerson (left) – a man unknown to her very own siblings until her arrest at her ritzy pad in New Hampshire, Tuckedaway, in July 2020 – has failed to even bother to put in appearance and has allegedly busied himself living-it-up with a “yoga enthusiast” who reportedly “has an ass that could crack open a walnut” named Kris McGinn. So much for better, for worse, for richer, for poorer, it seems; so much for standing by your woman, Scott.

Already clearly fearing for the worst possible outcome (i.e. the conviction of their decidedly deviant alleged mucky madam sibling, Ghislaine), the Maxwell family have been spinning out stories claiming that there will be immediate appeal if there is a conviction coming their way. In May this year, using their @RealGhislaine Twitter account, the family had a pop at those making allegations against the perverted pest Kevin Spacey – who unsurprisingly was a close mate of Jeffrey Epstein and his one-time lover – and remarked: “Kevin Spacey has suffered… repetitional [sic] damage from CD’s allegations. Info & allegations that are highly sensitive & of a personal nature can flow both ways… It would be harder to mitigate against that stigma if CD were permitted to remain anonymous.” No doubt, said daughter of the murderer-robber baron Robert Maxwell would like all of her four accusers named (and shamed) now also.
December 28, 2021
The Met & Maxwell – The Cressida Dick & Ghislaine Maxwell Connection

As ‘The Sun’ hints that she was a madam in London in the 2000s, we ask why wasn’t the 1994 Met Police investigation into what went on with high-class hookers at Ghislaine Maxwell’s South Kensington Mews house not taken further?

Now deservedly under fire and slammed as “incompetent and obstructive,” Dame Cressida Dick DBE, QPM became a police constable with the Metropolitan Police in 1983 and “within 10 years was promoted to chief inspector,” according to The Guardian.

Dame Cressida’s life prior to joining the rozzers was gilded. Oxford born and educated in the “leafy” environs of “the successful academic battery farm” Oxford High School and an alumna there of Ghislaine Maxwell, according to The Times, “Britain’s (current) top police officer” went on to the Dragon School whilst the ‘Bouncing Czech’s’ decidedly deviant daughter progressed through various educational establishments.

Curiously, both women also later came to share having studied at Balliol College, Oxford in the early 1980s. Though it remains unknown if their paths crossed on any other level subsequently, we again today remind readers that in 1994, Ghislaine Maxwell’s home between 1989 and 1997, 69 Stanhope Mews East, South Kensington, London, SW7, was placed under surveillance by the Metropolitan Police on the suspicion that someone was running a high-class brothel from that very address.

69 Stanhope Mews East, South Kensington, London, SW7 5QT was the subject of a covert surveillance exercise by the Metropolitan Police in 1994 whilst under the ownership of the pension pot plundering ‘Cap’n Bob’s’ decidedly deviant daughter. Very young ladies of a certain type were seen coming coming and going during the period and it was suspected by neighbours that the house was being operated as a high class whore house run by a smart looking madam.

The current occupants of 69 Stanhope Mews are clearly sick of media attention and in spite of the mews house being on a public highway recently placed a “no photography or video recording” sign in their window. They also have a problem with dogs peeing on their plant pots.

Speaking exclusively to The Steeple Times in December 2020 of her experience, a businesswoman who lived opposite remarked:

“I was visited by officers from the Met Police in 1994 whom asked to use a bedroom in my property and to install a camera at the window to monitor the house diagonally opposite, 69 Stanhope Mews East.”

“I was not told at the time who the person concerned was, but I now realise it was Ghislaine Maxwell who was the owner of that house. I recall seeing very young girls coming and going from that building very often.”

“The officers remained for a week and then I heard no more about what happened next. All I knew was that a brothel was being operated from there and that the police wanted to close it down. They could have caught this evil woman then, but maybe her friendships with powerful people like Prince Andrew helped ensure her criminality was swept under the carpet.”

In this photograph, taken on 22nd November 2000 at the Red Cube nightclub in London, Ghislaine Maxwell sips on a cocktail as she stares at three women she was allegedly controlling.

Now, with The Sun yesterday running the headline: “SHOCKING: Ghislaine Maxwell took three girls to target wealthy men at party attended by Prince Charles” in 2000 with a photo to accompany as evidence, it seems pertinent to again enquire as to result of the 1994 investigation as the paper effectively hints that since croaked paedophile Jeffrey Epstein’s one-time lover was not just a procurer for him alone.

In a report by journalist Michael Hamilton, an unnamed broker who attended the after-party at the Red Cube nightclub for a screening of Charlie’s Angels in the presence of the heir to the throne encountered Maxwell there with a bevy of blondes.

Of the incident, The Sun stated:

“The unnamed broker said he is ‘appalled’ at the thought of Maxwell rubbing shoulders with guests.”

“He added: ‘The three girls came up to me and a friend and were being very flirtatious. They were in their late teens or early 20s.”

“One, who is on my right in the picture, seemed to be the leader and was asking us if we wanted to buy them drinks or go on somewhere. The girl on my left was quieter and more nervous. And the girl at the back was East European and also quiet. It seemed their questions were all to ascertain our wealth.”

“None of us were interested and – after a few minutes when that became clear – they were ushered away by Maxwell.”

“Our source, who found the snap while clearing possessions, added: ‘Maxwell, seemed to be shooting daggers at the girls – annoyed that they were spending too long with us and moved them along. We saw Maxwell walk with them into the crowd. She seemed to be in charge.’”

“‘My friend and I talked about whether they might be escorts. It is shocking when I think back to that night, considering what I’ve read about Maxwell and Epstein. Obviously, she hasn’t been found guilty in her trial, but some of the claims are horrible and shocking.’”

Clearly given her already known longstanding connections to Prince Andrew, Miss Maxwell would most definitely have been on the radar of both the police and secret services in Britain from the 1980s onwards. We thus ask again: Why was nothing done about what was clearly going on at 69 Stanhope Mews East in 1994 especially given since that Maxwell allegedly “cared and befriended Minor Victim 3 in London, England, between about 1994 and 1995?”

In 1995, according to Wikipedia, Dame Cressida was transferred to Thames Valley Police, where she eventually became the chief superintendent and area commander for Oxford before returning to the MPS in 2001 as a commander.

Pictured top – Currently incarcerated alleged mucky madam Ghislaine Maxwell and currently deservedly under fire Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis Dame Cressida Dick DBE, QPM were educated at Oxford High School at the same time. They both subsequently attended Balliol College, Oxford in the early 1980s.

December 20, 2021
Ghislaine Nags Nathan
After a row between Ghislaine Maxwell and her legal team in court on Thursday, the mucky madam decided not to testify; she also failed to get the eccentric owner of The Nags Head pub across the pond from Belgravia, London in time to support her

Asked to the stand to testify in the case against her on Friday by Judge Alison J. Nathan, alleged sex trafficker and mucky madam Ghislaine Maxwell curtly and arrogantly responded: “Your honour, the government has not proven its case beyond a reasonable doubt so there is no reason for me to testify.”

Previously, on Thursday evening, Hunting Ghislaine podcaster John Sweeney had tweeted: “Tonight, after jury left, GMax [Ghislaine Maxwell] angry as she argued with her $7m defence team. They’d put up a nice lady who’d not been to Palm Beach, a travel agent, a Prof of BuggsBunnyology. None of it cut the mustard.”

Clearly, such a mistake could have been one of the factors why Miss Maxwell decided to effectively silence her last chance to defend her own reputation on Friday, but equally, it must be remembered, here is a woman whose own pension pot plundering, murderer father once stated: “I have a beautiful daughter and she’s just like me.”

Shortly after he fell, jumped or was pushed off the back of his gin palace on 5th November 1991, Ghislaine Maxwell declared of the dodgy dad she clearly loved more than anyone else before or since in her life: “He wasn’t a crook. A thief to me is someone who steals money. Do I think my father did that? No. I don’t know what he did. Obviously something happened. Did he put it in his pocket? Did he run off with the money? No. And that’s my definition of a crook.” Subsequently, the spoilt socialite replaced this to her God-like monster with another crooked monster in the form of the equally repugnant Jeffrey Epstein (though it is rumoured the pair could have been connected as early as 1988 and it is also rumoured that ‘Monster 1’ could have used ‘Monster 2’ as a money funnel for the still missing £500 million he disgracefully plundered from his company’s poor pensioners).

Indicating that all there could be a spanner-in-the-works for #TeamMaxwell, journalist and ‘Hunting Ghislaine’ podcaster John Sweeney tweeted Thursday: “Tonight, after jury left, GMax angry as she argued with her $7m defence team. They’d put up a nice lady who’d not been to Palm Beach, a travel agent, a Prof of BuggsBunnyology. None of it cut the mustard.”

Making no mention of her alleged “frailty” or how she’s been playing “monster moves” and “growling” with prison guards, the ‘Bouncing Czech’s’ decidedly deviant daughter’s lawyers also got a stern telling off from Judge Nathan on Friday – a woman with clear associations to President Biden whose patience has been tested by croaked paedophile Jeffrey Epstein’s lover-and-bestie on multiple occasions from the very first time they encountered one another.

During the day’s “rocky” sitting, defence attorney Laura Menninger asked for more time to produce her client’s 35 witnesses – some of whom had failed to respond to subpoenas issued two-and-a-half weeks ago even.

Menninger bleated: “We are flying people across the country, across the pond, our client’s life is on the line, and we are given only a half a day to put on a witness,” but this soppy nonsense was deservedly met with a stonewall when the judge responded: “I have a rule, you have your next witness or you rest.”

Judge Nathan then enquired: “Why am I hearing about it for the first time now?” In response, Menninger pleaded: “There’s been a lot got on. To be honest your honour, it’s a lot of work,” but this was bounced back with: “A non-responsive witness is not a little thing.”

Subsequently, following this bang-on-the-nail rebuke, 59-year-old Maxwell’s team were only able to put forward a pathetic 9 out of their 35 proposed witnesses and amongst the excuses offered for non-attendance were that one witness refused to respond to a federal subpoena, another said they would take the fifth and a third was not being called because they have COVID-19.”

The defence team did manage to call a “curt and tense” Eva Dubin – a former Miss Sweden, now wife of hedge fund manager Glenn Dubin and lover of Jeffrey Epstein for eleven years in the 1980s – to give evidence, however. It didn’t exactly go to plan as when questioned about her self-declared “memory issues,” she answered: “It’s very hard for me to remember anything far back. Sometimes I can’t even remember things from last month. My family notices and I notice it. It’s been an issue.”

Going further, of Dubin’s appearance at the court, the MailOnline later declared: “It was not clear if she was willingly giving evidence or after being subpoenaed,” before adding: “As [she] walked into the court Maxwell turned her head around and looked to the door and followed her with her eyes as she walked in and up to the witness box. During Dubin’s evidence Maxwell stared intently at her, sitting up in her chair.” Clearly, it must have been apparent to those present, that there is no love lost between these two women.

Billionaire hedge fund manager Glenn Dubin and his former Miss Sweden wife are a couple with longstanding connections to both Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell on all levels. Mr Dubin supposedly first saw his now wife when she appeared in the ‘New York Post’s’ ‘Page Six’ in a modelling photograph and in August 2019 featured in unsealed documents that included allegations of his involvement in a sex ring. In September 2020, the Attorney General of the British Virgin Islands subpoenaed the Dubins as part of their investigations into the dealings of Jeffrey Epstein whilst in September 2019, ‘Vanity Fair’s’ William D. Cohan revealed: “For billionaire Glenn Dubin, the Epstein saga is far from over.” At that time, he suggested: “Could one of Manhattan’s most prominent power couples know more about the Epstein mystery?”

In February 2021, crusading author of ‘Ghislaine Maxwell: An Unauthorized Biography’ Kirby Sommers exclusively shared with ‘The Steeple Times’ her thoughts about a photograph of Jeffrey Epstein on one of his private jets with his hands on the bare flesh of a sleeping girl on his lap. She also shared an image of Celia Dubin, one of Glenn and Eva Dubin’s three children, alongside an image of a girl with a naked bottom that Jeffrey Epstein kept next to his bed. Sommers remarked: “Celia Dubin bears a striking resemblance to the photo of the little girl that hung in Jeffrey Epstein’s home which Virginia Giuffre provided to the FBI over one decade ago.”

On Friday, journalist Julie K. Brown tweeted: “The 81-YO witness is/was the owner of the Nags Head pub, watering hole across the st from Maxwell’s former London townhouse. Defense wants him to refute accuser recollection that she met Maxwell at that address during the time period.” Another Twitter user going by the handle @NWOGaction shared a picture of 81-year-old publican Kevin Moran and responded: “’Did you ever take a week, a day or even a few hours off from behind the bar in the many years you have been the landlord?’ ‘Yes?’ ‘No more questions Your Honour.’” Precisely.

Next, another of Maxwell’s lawyers, Christian Everdell announced that they planned to call 81-year-old Kevin Moran, the especially eccentric owner of The Nags Head in Kinnerton Street, Belgravia, London – a not-so-ritzy public house opposite the London home Ghislaine Maxwell owned from 1997 until 2020.

Whilst this pub might be considered eccentrically quaint by some, it, for sure, isn’t a place one would imagine Ghislaine Maxwell hanging out with snotty snobs like Jeffrey Epstein and Pizza Express lovers like Prince Andrew. It was surprising, therefore that, Mr Everdell proceeded to argue it a “critical issue” that Mr Moran be called for the defence. In then unhelpfully declaring that “the pub owner could not be there until Monday at the earliest,” what occurred was certainly an example of Maxwell behaving in her late father’s fashion and putting the ‘distraction technique’ into play.

On Friday evening, a reader of The Steeple Times with an especially strong reason to be interested in this case contacted us to say he’d spoken a female Irish employee of The Nags Head earlier in the day. He asked said individual: “Is Kevin [Moran] flying to New York over the weekend?” and got a brusque “no” in response. Said barmaid then slammed down the phone without further ado.

“Unimpressed” by all these shenanigans given Maxwell’s legal team – who’ve already cost her and those close to her multi-million pounds – have had over 500 days to prepare their witnesses, Judge Nathan performed a slam-dunk and declared: “If this cases today [Friday], it closes today [Friday].”

Meanwhile elsewhere, at 10.15pm GMT Friday, Sky News completed a round-up of what’ll happen next. They announced: “[Maxwell’s] legal team has now rested its case after two days of presenting evidence on her behalf, with closing arguments expected on Monday before jurors begin their deliberations.”

It’s now time to let those dice roll, but given how this rollercoaster has run thus far, God only knows where they’ll land.

Pictured top – Convicted-now-croaked paedophile Jeffrey Epstein cradles his alleged sex trafficker lover Ghislaine Maxwell (left) whilst said mucky madam provocatively poses with mates of them both, temperamental model Naomi Campbell, 45^th POTUS Donald Trump and his allegedly trafficked third wife, Melania (right).

Ghislaine Maxwell’s former home – 44 Kinnerton Street, Belgravia, London, SW1X 8ES – is situated directly opposite the Kevin Moran independent public house, The Nags Head. The mews house was previously occupied by a harness maker named William Ferguson in 1891 and subsequently rented by an American foreign service officer named Lewis Clark in 1947. It was sold in March 2021 for circa £1.45 million, a sum 400% higher than the £290,000 the alleged sex trafficker paid for it in 1997. The building has since been repainted in an effort to disguise its decidedly dubious past.

The interior of The Nags Head public house – Could anyone actually imagine a socialite like Ghislaine Maxwell actually hanging out at the bar there with the likes of Jeffrey Epstein, Prince Andrew and Naomi Campbell? Whilst it was a popular haunt for radio DJ Chris Evans during the drunken days of his car-crash marriage to actress Billie Piper in the early 2000s, it’s hardly got the vibe that Mar-a-Lago loving, cashmere-clad ‘Mucky Maxwell’ apparently likes. Its interior, however, is certainly in need of a bit of a scrub, just like, no doubt, ‘Cap’n Bob’s’ deviant daughter’s filthy Metropolitan Dention Center cell.

In a review last updated in April 2018, the ‘Londonist’ was not extremely thrilled with their visit to The Nags Head and declared of it: “Prepare to be admonished. This notoriously fussy pub won’’ tolerate mobile phones, customers sitting at tables that are too large for their group, or curious snoopsters taking a peek down the adjacent private mews. (All three drew a comment on our most recent visit… and we were only there for 45 minutes.) We’d half expect a moany email telling us to take these surreptitiously taken photos down, only we suspect the bar staff have never heard of the internet. So, if you’re sensitive to that ‘we do things our way’ attitude, then avoid at all costs. If, however, you quite like to see a bit of character then the Nag’s Head has plenty going for it. The crooked wooden interior is split onto two levels, with one bar serving both. The staff have been known to leap over the lower bar, which contains no flaps. Publican Kevin Moran (not the Republic of Ireland footballer) is the latest in a short line of landlords – the place only had five between the mid-Victorian period and 1950. Look out for the pump handles – they’re over 150 years old and made from Chelsea pottery. The pub is decorated all around with other unlikely baubles, such as vintage one-arm bandits and a pair of Edwardian ice skates. Despite its fierce independence, it only dispenses ho-hum Adnams brews. Odd. We haven’t tried the food, but reviews on other sites do not paint the most nourishing of pictures. This is a pub in which you will go through all the emotions.”

The now infamous photograph of Prince Andrew with Virginia Roberts and Ghislaine Maxwell in her house opposite The Nags Head at 44 Kinnerton Street, Belgravia, London in March 2001 (top). It clearly shows the white bannister that also features in Shaun Attwood’s interview with the ‘cleaner’ at the same address in 2019 (below).

The case against Ghislaine Maxwell

The late ‘Cap’n Bob’s’ deviant daughter is on trial before Judge Nathan on counts of:
- Conspiracy to entice minors to travel to engage in illegal sex acts.
- Enticement of a minor to travel to engage in illegal sex acts.
- Conspiracy to transport minors with intent to engage in criminal sexual activity.
- Transporting a minor with the intent to engage in criminal sexual activity.
- Sex trafficking conspiracy.
- Sex trafficking of a minor.
- Lying under oath (to be heard separately at a later date).
Some of the key ‘Famous Faces’ whose names have mostly thus far avoided mention at ‘The Trial of The Decade’
- Alexander Acosta
- Woody Allen
- Ehud Barak
- Tom Barrack
- Jean-Luc Brunel
- Naomi Campbell
- President Bill Clinton and his wife Hillary
- Alan Dershowitz
- Glenn Dubin and his wife Eva
- Bill Gates
- Geordie Greig
- Lord Mandelson
- Marvin Minsky
- George J. Mitchell
- Rupert Murdoch
- Peter Nygård
- Bill Richardson III
- Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman
- Kevin Spacey
- Jes Staley
- Ken Starr
- President Donald Trump and his potentially trafficked wife Melania
- Ivana Trump
- Chris Tucker
- Harvey Weinstein
- Leslie Wexner
- Prince Andrew, Duke of York and his live-in ex-wife Sarah, Duchess of York
December 18, 2021
The Power Play of Maxwell & Nathan
As “monster mover” Ghislaine Maxwell claims to be too frail to testify at her trial and gets a rejection over having her witnesses testify under pseudonyms, the judge in the case pops off to Washington to plan her own future after a nomination from President Biden; a true power play is now underway

On Wednesday, Judge Alison J. Nathan “paused from the trial [of Ghislaine Maxwell] for a trip to Washington, where she faced questions of a different sort” according to Benjamin Weiser of The New York Times.

Now nominated to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit by President Biden, Judge Nathan “was grilled at her confirmation hearing by members of the Senate Judiciary Committee. The questions came mostly from Republicans, who asked about her views on guns rights, capital punishment, compassionate release requests by felons during the pandemic, as well as her past writings and legal advocacy.”

Echoing her earlier approach of keeping alleged mucky madam Maxwell’s ‘little black book’ to remain secret to “avoid ‘needless’ namedropping,” Judge Nathan, when asked by Senator Mike Lee, a Republican of Utah: “Should illegal immigrants be allowed to cast votes in state and local elections?” answered: “That’s a policy question that would be inappropriate for me, as a sitting court judge or a nominee to the Second Circuit, to weigh in on.”

Clearly a lady on a mission to progress her career after ‘The Trial Of The Decade’ ends, the judge was then asked: “Do you think America is mostly good or mostly bad?” by Senator John Kennedy, Republican of Louisiana.

The New York Times reported on her clearly strategically motivated answer:

“She answered by describing a walk she took on Tuesday with her sons to the Supreme Court, where she once had been a law clerk, and of seeing the inscription engraved above the entrance, ‘Equal Justice Under Law… I’m proud to be a part of this American judicial system,’ Judge Nathan said.”

“Yes, ma’am,” Mr. Kennedy said. “But do you think America is mostly good or mostly bad?’ ’America is mostly good, Senator,’ she replied.”

Returning to her New York courtroom on Thursday, Judge Nathan rejected Miss Maxwell’s attempts to have some government defence witnesses testify under pseudonyms or partial names. In doing so, she quite rightly drew a clear distinction between the need to protect the identities of alleged crime victims and the privacy concerns of ‘The Bouncing Czech’s’ deviant daughter’s friends and cronies.

Though many are questioning many of the strange things going on at this trial, one can now only hope that the concept that nobody – however powerful they may or may not be – should be allowed to be above the law… And that must include Ghislaine Maxwell and those supporting her.

Pictured top – A protestor outside the New York court where Ghislaine Maxwell is on trial with a placard reading: ‘Media Silent’ on Thursday; 49-yeard-old Judge Alison J. Nathan with Chuck Schumer, the senate majority leader, during a Senate committee hearing on Wednesday.

A power play between a powerful woman of the past and a powerful woman of the future – Ghislaine Maxwell and Judge Alison J. Nathan are two well connected individuals who’ve been brought together in the oddest and most seedy of circumstances. Whether the former will actually take to the stand during her trial remains to be seen, but such a course of action appears more and more unlikely.

The case against Ghislaine Maxwell

The late ‘Cap’n Bob’s’ deviant daughter is on trial in a power play before Judge Nathan on counts of:
- Conspiracy to entice minors to travel to engage in illegal sex acts.
- Enticement of a minor to travel to engage in illegal sex acts.
- Conspiracy to transport minors with intent to engage in criminal sexual activity.
- Transporting a minor with the intent to engage in criminal sexual activity.
- Sex trafficking conspiracy.
- Sex trafficking of a minor.
- Lying under oath.
Some of the key ‘Famous Faces’ whose names have mostly thus far avoided mention at ‘The Trial of The Decade’
- Alexander Acosta
- Woody Allen
- Ehud Barak
- Tom Barrack
- Jean-Luc Brunel
- Naomi Campbell
- President Bill Clinton and his wife Hillary
- Alan Dershowitz
- Glenn Dubin and his wife Eva
- Bill Gates
- Geordie Greig
- Lord Mandelson
- Marvin Minsky
- George J. Mitchell
- Rupert Murdoch
- Peter Nygård
- Bill Richardson III
- Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman
- Kevin Spacey
- Jes Staley
- Ken Starr
- President Donald Trump and his potentially trafficked wife Melania
- Ivana Trump
- Chris Tucker
- Harvey Weinstein
- Leslie Wexner
- Prince Andrew, Duke of York and his live-in ex-wife Sarah, Duchess of York
A seriously sick set of power players – Alleged victim of sexual abuse by her own father turned alleged sex trafficker and sexual abuser of other women Ghislaine Maxwell flashing her cleavage at the since croaked paedophile Jeffrey Epstein and the since incarcerated fellow alleged sexual abuser Jean-Luc Brunel.

Though Ghislaine Maxwell will be “unlikely” to testify at her own trial – and remarked in November: “I am weak, I am frail. I have no stamina. I am tired. I don’t even have shoes which fit properly. They feed me rotten food. One apple had maggots in it. I have not been allowed to exercise. In my most recent court appearance, I was in leg irons for more than 12 hours and had to climb up and down stairs with my arms and legs shackled to my waist. My ankles are raw. I was given a pat-down so aggressive and violent, my underwear found itself in a place it doesn’t belong. The first underwear they gave me were enormous granny pants. You could have put five of me in them. I’ll spare you descriptions of the stains” – she clearly has contradicted herself with her somewhat bizarre “screen-siren-like” antics in the courtroom whilst clad in expensive cashmere and the statement: “I play peek-a-boo, hiding behind pillars and the guards join in. There are always smiles all round. Then I have a ‘monster move’ where I raise my hands and growl and they do it back. We laugh.” Here is a woman with exactly the same deviant streak as her pension pot plundering, murderer father, Robert.
December 17, 2021
Was Jeffrey Epstein Murdered?

Ian Maxwell’s ramblings on ‘The Spectator’s’ ‘Americano’ podcast are nothing but nonsensical, though his sister may have a point in suggesting Jeffrey Epstein could have been murdered

At The Steeple Times we’re loathe to trust a word that come from her lying lips, but for once Ghislaine Maxwell might be bang on the nail.

Speaking to The Spectator’s ‘Americano’ podcast on Friday, the alleged mucky madam’s brother, Ian, told host Freddy Gray that his sister is the only member of his family that believes her former lover, Jeffrey Epstein, was murdered in jail.

Mr Maxwell commented:

“I do [fear for my sister’s safety]… I am not wholly convinced that he killed himself. Actually, I think that that’s not been very well explained, how a man supposedly under 24/7 guard, in broadly similar isolated conditions to those of my sister is experiencing could somehow die on U.S. watch.”

“It’s extraordinary to me, so yes there is a possibility that she’s in some danger. I don’t buy the suicide watch regime. It’s a nonsense. She’s not a suicide risk. There’s been no evidence of any self-harm. Obviously she’s not a danger to any third parties – which a judge has acknowledged on numerous occasions, so this is – and I can only read it this way – torture and it’s designed to break her.”

“The result is, today, though she turns up for trial and looks the best she can, she is clearly frail, she’s clearly lost an enormous amount of weight and I don’t know how much more she can take.”

“I haven’t talked to my sister since the 10^th June 2019. I happen to remember that because all of the family got together for the first time in eight years on that day – which have been my father’s 96^th birthday. So, I remember it well.”

“I don’t buy a lot of the conspiracy theories at all. It so happens one of the conspiracy theories about my father is that he was murdered rather than committed suicide or died by accident.”

“And I would venture to believe that she may also think that Epstein was murdered… I do happen to think my sister does think that he was killed.”

“Racy images” that emerged this week showed the currently incarcerated mucky madam with her “breasts falling out of her skimpy top” as she massaged the feet of her since croaked paedophile lover. Prior to her trial, the Maxwell family have tried to portray their sibling as wholesome, decent and honest; they’ll have trouble explaining images such as these, however.

Robert Maxwell’s favourite child, front, with her siblings Anne, Kevin, the twins Isabel and Christine, Philip and Ian in London in June 2019.

Alluding to his role in PR peddling on his sister’s behalf, the ‘Bouncing Czech’s’ son remarked:

“She knows that I am talking to the media on her behalf and yes we can communicate with her through her lawyers because her lawyers, pretrial, were seeing her through Zoom and in-person for several hours a day.”

“Don’t forget the bulk of her sentence has been served in the middle of the pandemic when there were no in-person visits to prisons anywhere in the world I would have thought and certainly not America.”

“So, if we want to say things to her or get messages to her, we do it through the lawyers and they come back the same way. So, in that sense there is a communication, but it’s not the same as giving your sister a hug and saying ‘hi’ and so on.”

Going further, in a ramble of nonsensical proportions, Mr Maxwell attempted to garner sympathy for his sister and added:

“We’re very close as siblings. There’s a gap of fifteen years between my oldest sister Anne, who is now 73, and my youngest sister, Ghislaine, who’ll be 60 on Christmas Day.”

“When you’ve had the kind of alpha male father that we did, you tended to stay close as kids and we’ve done so as adults.”

“[Family life] for us was an extraordinary experience. Not because we had some father with a vast amount of wealth and access to all kinds of goodies. My father was a pretty tough dad and he was a believer that if you had privileges, you also had obligations and he was a pretty serious kind of guy and he brought us up to work hard and if we didn’t, we were belted pretty well and I was hit a few times.”

“But there was a lot of love there and I knew about the best side to stay of him. The best way I could describe this would be in the form of a Chinese proverb that says: ‘Never be too far from the sun that you freeze, never be too close to it that you burn’ and it’s a very narrow line. And we had to run it.”

“We’re pretty clear about [our father]. We love him, the only father we ever knew and I think at some point, we were all in fear of him, but the overwhelming memory of him is a positive memory and not a negative one.”

Turning to his sister replacing her clearly monstrous and alleged abuser of her father with another monster, Jeffrey Epstein, Mr Maxwell offered:

“I can see that is a relatively easy jump to make. She has had boyfriends. She had a very longstanding boyfriend for about seven years or so immediately following going out with Jeffrey, so sometime in the late 1990s, early 2000s, who also happened to be wealthy and so on.”

“She’s somebody who grew up with a demanding father, intelligent, she was present at constant dinners and lunches and social events where she met a lot of very interesting people. Some of them wealthy, some of them brilliant scientists and so on. So, she was used to being with intelligent men whom she could respect and so on and inevitably in those kind of circles, there’s a lot of money at the same time.”

“I don’t think that it follows that she went directly from my father to Jeffrey as a clone, but if it hadn’t been Jeffrey it would have been some other rich, intelligent man.”

“I suppose I became aware of [Epstein and Maxwell’s] relationship in the early 1990s, but I and my brother, Kevin, were in terrible trouble because our father’s businesses had blown up. We were directors of it, we were subsequently arrested in June 1992 and then we had four years in the wilderness and a very well covered trial, a criminal fraud trial which ran from 1995 to 1996.

“There was no time in that context other than to fight for our lives and I lost my marriage in that process and I didn’t see very much of my sister during that whole time. I couldn’t travel, our passports had been taken and so-on.”

“Only when we were acquitted in January 1996, finally we flew off to America to see Ghislaine and she affected a number of business introductions for us and on that occasion, I remember on that occasion, I remember meeting Jeffrey Epstein for lunch with Ghislaine and with Kevin and I have to say I didn’t warm to him.”

“He didn’t strike me as, he was a bit of a cagey character, clearly intelligent, had a certain charisma, but he was someone who took things from you rather than gave things back. Not a man, not a very clubbable man, not a man you want to go and have a drink with and that was the only time that I met him.”

“By the time I met him in 1996, that relationship had been ongoing on since 1992 for sure and I think it had therefore passed… I didn’t get [the impression they were together] when I was there with them, but you know, we now see photographs that have surfaced during the course of this trial that are, I don’t know what the dates there on them are, but are very early in their relationship and it is clear that she is very fond of him.”

Regarding his father’s preferential treatment of his sister, Mr Maxwell stated:

“I don’t think that’s true, though I know people think that because he ended up naming his boat ‘Lady Ghislaine,’ but the story behind that is a much more prosaic story. He actually wanted to call it the ‘Lady Elizabeth’ – and name it for my mother – but there already was a ‘Lady Elizabeth’ and you couldn’t have two boats with the same name.”

“I’m not sure, but I think what he decided was the way to best deal with it, so he went from my mother to my youngest sister, Ghislaine, and that’s how that happened, but Ghislaine, like all of our siblings, if she was in trouble, she was cast out and she had a fair amount of tough times with my father.”

Turning to his sister’s trial itself, Mr Maxwell added:

“I think that the key thing is that she should never have been put on trial. The case against her is really a case against Jeffrey Epstein. It’s been reversed engineered post his death against my sister and it’s been driven from the start by a combination of enormous embarrassment on the part of the U.S. legal authorities on the one hand and by the greed of the lawyers of the accusers on the other hand.”

“And that has whipped up tremendous fury against my sister that has totally trashed her presumption of innocence and has led to her being jailed for over 527 days in isolation, treated as guilty before any trial and by virtue of being a pre-trial detainee, she is innocent, but that’s been completely cast-aside.”

“She’s been, as I said, kept in isolation, she has been woken up every fifteen minutes throughout the night for over 500 days by torchlight – allegedly to see if she is alive. She is deemed to be a suicide risk. Patently she is not.”

“She’s been denied bail four times by the judge at first instance and twice by the appeal court judges.”

“She’s been brought to the trial as recently as yesterday in four-point shackles from her jail, forced to walk up and down stairs in the courtroom.”

“She’s not being fed properly. She’s not been able to see her lawyers for more than 15 minutes during the pre-trial and post hearings. I mean, this is outrageous and it’s in a first world country like the United States of America.”

“It’s a disgrace and it’s why the family lodged a complaint with the United Nations Working Group on Arbitary Detention in Geneva just about three weeks ago because America must be held to account for what has happened to her.”

The look of love – Alleged victim of abuse by her father turned alleged abuser of young women Ghislaine Maxwell and her since croaked paedophile lover Jeffrey Epstein. Here is a duo, whatever the outcome of the current trial, who’ll go down in history as mucky, murky and mendacious.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VeS38whavT4

December 12, 2021