Is the era of “what Meghan wants, Meghan gets” well and truly over for the demanding and devious Duchess of Sussex?
It seems that the tawdry terror that is the Duchess of Sussex has finally completed her passage and morphed from the ‘Modern Day Mrs Simpson’ into the ‘Modern Day Marie Antoinette.’
Living in extreme luxury in her £11 million mansion in California and having raked in over £147 million from Netflix and Spotify, the greedy grabber whom forms one half of the dubious duo that is ‘Ginge’ and ‘Cringe’ stands accused of telling porkie pies to a court in London and was somewhat charitably dubbed “difficult to deal with” in Monday night’s BBC show The Princes and the Press.
Slammed elsewhere in the French media with a “devastating backlash” that reference her as a liar and someone whose “mask has slipped,” the former Meghan Markle has also been shot down yet again by her very own father.
Speaking after his daughter’s car-crash interview on The Ellen DeGeneres Show, Mr Markle raged:
“It’s no way to behave. The whole thing was kind of embarrassing. It was certainly embarrassing for the royal family. It’s embarrassing for her as well. I suspect it embarrassed everyone in the UK, too.”
“She’s putting herself out there as a duchess but I’ve never seen a duchess behave this way, doing stupid stunts… I love my daughter but her performance was ridiculous.”
“She insulted the queen, the royal family and the British people. She made a complete fool of herself and should lose her title.”
Going further of ‘MeGain’s’ claims that a car she had owned in her youth didn’t have functioning doors, her father commented:
“It was not a beat-up old car… The Ford Explorer she had in her early 20s that she mentioned was a good running vehicle. I don’t remember any time she had to crawl out of the back of it to get out, like she said. The doors worked fine on that vehicle until the day she got rid of it.”
Referencing Amol Rajan’s BBC show, which continues on Wednesday 8th December, the Daily Mail’s Richard Kay yesterday asked: “Why did the BBC give airtime to Meghan’s mouthpieces?” and specifically quite rightly questioned why “the duchess’s lawyer [Jenny Afia] spoke to [Rajan] with Meghan’s permission.”
In further observations, Kay questioned why the prattling PR peddler Omid Scobie was “amongst those given plenty of airtime” to say that “there were plenty of people who ‘felt [Meghan] needed to be put in her place.’” He added: “Why was this not properly challenged? More pertinently, Mr Scobie was not asked about his own relationship with the duchess.”
In analysis elsewhere, speaking on GB News, royal commentator Andrew Eborn suggested that “Meghan’s appearance on The Ellen Show is part of a PR campaign” and added: “I can tell you here and now she will be wanting to enter politics in the states.”
Instead of making such a move, the eternally power and privilege hungry Duchess of Sussex now ought to consider her position and recall the fate of Marie Antoinette. “Pardon me, sir, I did not do it on purpose” were the last words of the profligate, promiscuous French queen; “let them eat cake” – even if she never uttered such – is what she’ll be forever remembered for and ‘Murky Meg’ is well set for just the same epitaph.
‘Paris Match’s’ latest cover featuring a photograph of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex in New York was accompanied by the headline: “Meghan: Why she lied, Harry betrayed by advisor.” The ‘Daily Express’ described the magazine’s coverage as being “scathing about the Sussexes” and added: “Paris-based British journalist Peter Allen claimed the magazine’s criticism of the Sussex royals is particularly significant because “the French media has been quite respectful towards them in the past.”What Meghan wants, Meghan gets – Previous documentaries have featured former royal staff who have stated of the demanding duchess: “We have had report after report from people who have witnessed unacceptable behaviour.”Other comments have included: “I am very concerned that the duchess was able to bully two PAs out of the household in the past year.”
Thus set to be removed from having the ability to stick his cloven hooves in the proverbial over the trial of ‘Bouncing Bob’s’ deviant daughter as he’ll be isolated in the hellish confines of I’m A Celebrity… Get Me Out Of Here!, Madeley yesterday gave an “exclusive” interview to the MailOnline’s Ellie Phillips yesterday in which he finally admitted the truth about himself.
Declaring his career in “entertainment television” to have been “pretty pointless,” the 65-year-old also addressed being compared to Alan Partridge. He “insisted”:
“It is unfair… I honestly don’t care at all – it’s actually quite funny. It’s part and parcel of the job I do.”
“Judy and I started out on This Morning which isn’t really hard news. I don’t go to warzones, I do popular television, which on the whole is pretty pointless, it’s just entertainment. It doesn’t mean you’re remotely important or interesting.”
‘If people wanna take what I say – a quip or a comment – and compare me to Alan Partridge, good luck to them. I think some quotes are often taken so ludicracy out of context that it’s a bit unfair.”
Elsewhere, in a separate feature also in the MailOnline, the ‘Modern Day Dorian Gray’s’ clearly equally raunchy son-in-law, retired rugby player James Haskell, 36, tawdrily revealed he “approaches sex like a competitive sport” and claimed “you want to be sex, don’t you?”
Going further, quite unnecessarily, Ruck Me author Haskell shared:
“I’m having a good go at trying to be better. There’s a lot of people out there having a lot of bad sex. I want to improve on it.”
“If you’re lucky enough to see some progress in your performance and get some good reviews, why would you not carry on improving?”
Whatever will this tawdry, pointless pair be talking about next? Smashed-off-her-skull well-known boob flasher Judy’s bedroom antics?
‘Moneybags Madeley’– a clearly pointless man who has netted £300,000 a year to present ‘Good Morning Britain’ from December as well as £200,000 to appear in ‘I’m A Celebrity… Get Me Out Of Here!’ – and Finnigan are often pictured out boozing. Often, ‘Mummy Finnigan,’ as looks a little beyond pissed.“Pretty Pointless” Madeley’s “beefcake” son-in-law James Haskell revealed he approaches sex with his wife “like a competitive sport,” but “isn’t sure he’s very good at it” to the ‘MailOnline’ yesterday.
‘Pointless Madeley’s’ Finest Moments
On his son’s wedding
“There’s been so much angst about it… It’s been so choppy, but, yes, he got married and now we’ve got a daughter-in-law.”
Of his daughter, Chloe Madeley
“Sorry Chloe, but you were an accident and you know it!”
Of his son-in-law, rugby player James Haskell
“James is huge… Chloe brought him home quite early on… The downstairs hall went dark like a total eclipse.”
Of his wife, Judy Finnigan
“She’s my right arm.”
Of his wife being accused of being an alcoholic and him being accused of being a wife beater
“We’d gone away for a week to Cornwall with our children, and the mobile went in the car.”
“It was our bosses at Granada saying a terrible rumour was being put around that you’re in a self-help institution for men who batter their wives because you’ve beaten Judy, that Judy’s in a drying-out clinic and that the children are in care. We were in the f**king car.”
“We tracked it to the source… A particularly poisonous person. He’d leaked these smears and they were never published because we would have cleaned up in a libel case. But the one thing that lingered like a piece of floating sewage is this thing that Judy drinks. And she doesn’t.”
In conversation with President Clinton
“I know what it’s like to be wronged by the press. I was once accused of shoplifting. Unlike you though, I knew I was innocent.”
Of women
“I’ve never met a single woman who’s happy with the way she looks, except Jordan, although I’ve never met her.”
Of his personal abilities (aside from being “pretty pointless”)
“In real life, I bring, I’m quite a peace maker – certainly within the family and friends. When things get tense I’m good at calming things down.”
“That’s one of the things that I’ve got. I’m good at lowering the temperature when things get heated. I don’t think I’m gonna get confrontations in there.”
Of what other people think of him (aside from them considering him “pretty pointless”)
“I don’t worry about what people think.”
Of alleged mucky madam Ghislaine Maxwell
“The sharks are circling; they smell blood in the water… Cynics would say the [FBI] agency is playing a long game, seeking to sway the minds of jurors in advance of Maxwell’s trial next year… Innocent until proven guilty? That honourable credo is in shreds.”
“Firstly, consider the conditions under which Ms Maxwell is being held. They are truly grim… It would take a heart of stone not to feel empathy for another human being suffering what amounts to mental torture. To coin a phrase: you wouldn’t treat a dog like that.”
“But it’s not sadism, or premature punishment ahead of a verdict. No; there’s calculated purpose behind this pitiless regime. But, here’s another prediction… it will. They’re trying to break her.”
Of his television career
“Pointless… Not remotely important.”
“Judy and I started out on This Morning which isn’t really hard news. I don’t go to warzones, I do popular television, which on the whole is pretty pointless, it’s just entertainment. It doesn’t mean you’re remotely important or interesting.”
Of being compared to Alan Partridge
“It’s unfair… I honestly don’t care at all. It’s actually quite funny. It’s part and parcel of the job I do.”
“If people wanna take what I say – a quip or a comment – and compare me to Alan Partridge, good luck to them. I think some quotes are often taken so ludicracy out of context that it’s a bit unfair.”
Of being accused of making gaffes
“If the gaffe thing was as frequent and as serious as is sometimes written about, I wouldn’t have a job. I would’ve been out of work a long time ago.”
“I’m not going to get into a defensive crouch about it, but sometimes I read these things that I’m supposed to have said in the past, and I just didn’t say them. There’s nothing you can do about them.”
“It’s a bit like seagulls following a trawler, you just have to live with them.”
“So, I actually don’t think that I make gaffes nearly as often as people tease me about, which is fine. I don’t mind. So, no, I’m not too bothered. I’ve done thousands and thousands of hours of live television and I’ve never been sued for libel.”
Of his decision to go on I’m A Celebrity… Get Me Out Of Here!
“Judy didn’t do back handsprings up the stairs.”
“It’s a big dipper… It’s a bit like going to a great big party with silly forfeit games, and that’s how I’m regarding it.”
On elephants
“So, are you telling me elephants are not born evil?”
To a man crying after paramedics saved his life
“Stop crying! This is supposed to make you happy! Anyway, after the break, the biggest dog in the UK. And he really is big. Don’t miss it!”
Showing sympathy for people who died in quicksand in Morecambe Bay
“Yes, what an awful way to die.”
In Nostradamus-like fashion on coronavirus and lockdowns
“We are being duped… [They are trying to] put the fear of God into the public. A great reckoning is coming.”
“There’s no point in running away and hiding from the virus.”
“We must learn to live with coronavirus.”
“If I had a bell, I would ring it… Only 59 people who have been double vaccinated and without any other serious underlying health problems, died from COVID, out of 50,000 deaths in England, this year.”
“I have to say that the majority of people are surprisingly forgiving [to government representative Steve Barclay], and are actually saying that they understand that the reason for some of the mistakes wasn’t malpractice but scientific ignorance – we didn’t know enough… But on the whole, you seem to be getting away with it – as far as our viewers are concerned.”
Of visiting St Paul’s Cathedral aged eight
“I just froze and had to be carried out.”
Of old women skipping
“There’s not many better things than seeing an older woman skipping.”
Of wanting to be black
“I hope when I’m reincarnated I come back black because you age better.”
To Keira Knightley
“Can we get some make up please, get Keira looking like a crack whore, she’d make a good crack whore.”
Of an autistic teenager
“The thing with Daniel [Wakeford, a ‘star’ on Channel 4’s ‘Undateables] is, he has autism but is very intelligent and as we can see extremely talented. Has Daniel always been autistic?”
To a caller
“I understand you have a little lad of 12. Is it a boy or a girl?”
Judy Finnigan’s decision to defend footballer Ched Evans – jailed for 5 years in 2012 for allegedly raping a 19-year-old – on ‘Loose Women’ in October 2014 shocked the nation. Responding at the time, Katie Russell, of Rape Crisis England and Wales remarked: “Judy Finnegan’s comments are really unfortunate and could potentially cause some hurt and distress to the many survivors of sexual violence who will inevitably have been watching ‘Loose Women’ and who will read and hear her views reported.”
Whilst ‘Dorian Gray-esque’ Richard Madeley is best known for helping himself to champagne in supermarkets, his wife Judy Finnigan will be forever remembered for flashing at an awards ceremony in 2000.
Duchess of Sussex claims to be “too busy” to see the Queen at Christmas just as she’s advised to drop case against ‘Mail on Sunday’ after “forgetting” various email exchanges
This morning the Daily Star reported that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex are “too busy” to see the Queen this Christmas.
In an article by news reporter on podcasts Adam Goldsmith, the paper quoted royal author Stewart Pierce – whom stated: “Harry and Meghan won’t be able to [see the Queen at Sandringham] because of their own particular arrangements, because they’re very very busy with the next project – or the series of projects they’re involved in.”
Clearly selfish to their core at a time when his grandmother is clearly suffering as a result of several health scares, decidedly drippy Prince Harry’s decision is probably, in fact, actually motivated by the fact that his “embarrassed by THAT letter” wicked wastrel wife simply can’t face returning to the United Kingdom.
Elsewhere, yesterday, the iPaper ran an article by their arts and media correspondent Adam Sherwin. It was headlined: “Meghan Markle warned against taking Mail on Sunday privacy case to ‘high risk’ trial” and suggested legal experts have “warned that the Duchess of Sussex would be unwise to pursue her privacy case to a full trial which would require Meghan and other members of the royal family to face cross-examination.”
After last week being forced to apologise to the Court of Appeal “for forgetting email exchanges in which authorised her press aide, Jason Knauf, to brief the authors of ‘unauthorised’ biography Finding Freedom,” murky ‘MeGain’ is now looking less and less credible as a witness.
Speaking to the iPaper, “leading media lawyer” Mark Stevens remarked: “It’s high risk for her and she may be advised to seek an alternative outcome” whilst investigative journalist and “royal biographer” Tom Bower added: “If her case finally comes to trial in the High Court, Meghan will testify against her father and up to four former Palace officials. It would make sure the royal family is in her firing line.”
Concluding, the iPaper tellingly added:
“Royal sources told The Sunday Times that last week’s U-turn by the Duchess was just the ‘tip of the iceberg,’ with further claims that clash with her public statements likely to be aired.”
“A palace aide said: ‘Perhaps this gives them the understanding of why the royals don’t like to get into court cases. It’s not like this wasn’t going to happen.’”
Going further and released on YouTube on Sunday, Bower declared:
“The duchess has tasted her own medicine… Markle’s sparkle is fading fast. The crash of Meghan’s credibility has been dramatic. Her integrity hangs on a thin thread.”
“There will be many in Britain, not least amongst the royal family, who will smile with relief that the woman that hit them with accusations in the Oprah Winfrey interview is getting a taste of her own medicine.”
“Not least amongst her many accusations on Oprah was her claim that no one in Buckingham Palace was willing to protect me and that they forced her to be silent.”
“To me, much of the evidence now suggests palace officials worked overtime to protect and advise her. The saga of Meghan risks heading towards a downfall has some way to run, but this week saw the first cracks in the walls of secrecy she built over the past years to conceal her true nature.”
“Catastrophic harm would be inflicted on those she deeply resents [if she goes to trial] – Charles, William and Kate. The drama probably best described as ‘a tragedy’ started on her wedding day.”
“Stricken by a heart attack, her father Thomas could not fly from Mexico to walk her down the aisle. Thereafter, Meghan refused to speak to him again. Overnight, their lifelong bonds were broken. All his calls and texts were ignored, letters went unanswered.”
“Isolated in Mexico, the doting father became outraged by Meghan’s excommunication, so he gave a series of TV and newspaper interviews to demand Meghan talk to him and criticised the royal family for failing to support his daughter.”
“The royal family were aghast. According to Meghan, a senior member of the royal family berated Harry. ‘Can’t she just go and see him and make this stop?’”
“Harry, as Meghan wrote in a series of bombshell emails and texts that were released last Friday was ‘struggling because the royal family, they fundamentally don’t understand even after she and Harry tried endlessly explaining the situation to them.”
“As may become clear in the months ahead, the Sussexes explanations to Charles about Thomas Markle’s behaviour were likely to be inaccurate. A crisis was unfolding. In Meghan’s words: ‘Her relationship with the royal family was breaking down.’”
“Three months after the wedding, Meghan made an extraordinary decision. Instead of calling her father or flying to Los Angeles to meet him, she sent him a handwritten five-page letter.”
“In Thomas Markle’s opinion, the letter was hurtful and unloving. Meghan accused him of inventing his sickness, being paranoid, fabricating stories, attacking Harry and continually lying. She urged him to stop speaking to the media.”
“Although shocked by her allegedly false allegations and showing no concern for his health, Thomas Markle never actually showed the letter to anyone.”
“Everything changed when the sentiments of Meghan’s letter were quoted in February 2019 in an explosive article in America’s People magazine headlined: ‘The Truth About Meghan.’”
“Outraged, Thomas Markle claimed the article was not the truth and defamed him. He then allowed parts of Meghan’s letter to be republished by the Mail on Sunday.”
“Meghan went to war. She sued the newspaper for breaching her privacy and copyright.”
“The backwash of Meghan’s climbdown is just the beginning as to what would be an astonishing trial. She could still be saved if the Court of Appeal, despite how misleading the first trial judge, refuses to order a new trial. That decision would cause an uproar.”
“A well-established truism of British justice is that litigants must come to court with clean hands. Whatever happens now, Meghan’s reputation in Britain is in freefall, but last week in New York her sparkle was as high as ever.”
“Just as her self-damning confession was released, the former actress and Harry glided across the red carpet to ‘wow’ as international celebrities. Dressed in a stunning red gown, the scarlet lady smiled and told her many fans: ‘Nothing has changed. She’s still in business.’”
“In her mind, whatever happens in London is irrelevant to her glittering future.”
Meghan Markle, after marrying into the royal family, has fast been exposed as a busybody and ‘Modern Day Mrs Simpson.’ Even her outfit for the Oprah Winfrey interview paid homage to the equally deviant Wallis, Duchess of Windsor.Marie Antoinette-like Meghan Markle is now a figure deservedly reviled internationally. She is the finest living example of someone who doesn’t understand the premise of “you can’t have your cake and eat it.”Of this former actress, Tom Bower declared: ““The duchess has tasted her own medicine… Markle’s sparkle is fading fast. The crash of Meghan’s credibility has been dramatic. Her integrity hangs on a thin thread.”
Maxed-out Duchess of Sussex provides proof that greed ain’t really that good and in telling “untruths” about THAT letter illustrates how warped her moral compass truly is
In the 1987 film Wall Street, the key moment that viewers will recall is Gordon Gekko’s “Greed is Good” speech. In it, Gekko – played by Michael Douglas – declares:
“Greed for a lack of a better word is good. Greed is right. Greed works. Greed terrifies, cuts through and captures the essence of evolutionary spirit. Greed, in all of its forms, greed for life, for money, for love, knowledge has marked the upwards surge of mankind.”
One person who clearly has seized upon such and fixated her entire life living out this fallacy is the Duchess of Sussex – a decidedly wicked, self-serving woman whose entire being is devoted to the concept of “me, myself and I.”
First in her acting career, the former Meghan Markle trampled and trashed others to get to the top. She showed no mercy in this regard and with the help of her once bankrupted mother then decided to go after an even bigger prize: a royal.
To get there she used her father’s lottery winnings to get a perfectly decent education, dated and married several middle class men and then decided to ditch and ‘ghost’ these people when she got her claws into Prince Harry. He, being a deadbeat drip, fell for her hook, line and sinker and did as he was told and ditched even his closest friends; she, meanwhile, “ignored” her father even when he had two heart attacks and, as her half-sister Samantha Markle Grant has stated, “hurt everybody” in her birth family.
Once inside the royal fold, ‘MeGain’ realised that civic duty wasn’t on her agenda. ‘Murky Mucky’ – a woman who had claimed to have never even Googled the royal family prior to meeting her now husband yet allegedly went yachting with Prince Andrew prior to meeting his nephew – with the help of the likes of prattling PR peddler Omid Scobie then began spinning against the House of Windsor with allegations of racism and claims that she was not welcomed enthusiastically enough.
Not content with causing havoc and upset as Prince Philip approached death, ‘The Modern Day Mrs Windsor’ then took on the media and then uprooted her new family to Los Angeles in search of what she and her husband claimed to be a more private life.
Once settled in the luxury of their £11 million mansion in California, ‘Ginge’ and ‘Cringe’ set about contradicting all they’d previously declared by giving a tawdrily tacky interview to Oprah Winfrey and greedily and grubbily taking £110 million from Netflix and £37 million from Spotify, yet disgracefully still continued to bang on about their alleged mistreatment.
What is the truth about which member of the royal family the former Meghan Markle met first? Prince Andrew or Prince Harry? It is certainly true that both ‘Murky Mucky’ and ‘Randy Andy’ both appear to share a love of yachting and allegations that they “cavorted” on one long before the former actress turned wannabe global dominator moved to the UK have repeatedly done the rounds.The Duchess of Sussex’s claim that she hadn’t seen her half-sister Samantha Markle in 20 years has been proven to be a lie by fact of this photograph.The “publicity shy” Duchess of Sussex (or Meghan Markle as she then was) used to be happy to hang around with publicity loving known “knicker flasher” Lizzie Cundy. Whether she actually “ghosted” her former ‘friend’ and Piers Morgan is certainly, however, debatable.
Some questions that the mendacious minx that is the Duchess of Sussex ought to answer:
Given ‘MeGain’ banged on about her friendship with Prince Andrew’s daughters prior to meeting Prince Harry in the infamous Oprah interview, is there really any truth to her having never Googled the royal family or researched them with a view to seeking them out?
Did the then Meghan Markle really “ghost” her supposed chums Lizzie Cundy and Piers Morgan or are they both just getting rather carried away with their own attention seeking agendas?
Prior to marrying into the royal family and since, has ‘MeGain’ “organised pap shots” of herself?
Why did the Duchess of Sussex lie and claim she hadn’t met her half-sister in over 20 years when photographic evidence shows quite to the contrary 13 years ago?
Why didn’t the Duchess of Sussex simply show herself to be a bigger person and make amends with her own father instead of going to war on him? If she had simply behaved with dignity and made one less enemy, wouldn’t she have been perceived as a far better person?
What is the truth about the Duchess of Sussex’s mother’s past? Why are there no photographs of Doria Ragland in her time working in aviation, what is the truth about her bankruptcy and has she ever been to jail?
Why is the Duchess of Sussex claiming that the royal family “silenced” her at the same time as repeatedly giving interviews to the international media and taking the dime of the hardly quiet Netflix and Spotify?
Why are the Duke and Duchess of Sussex now suggesting they were “cut of financially” by the royal family when they previously stated they “wanted to be financially independent”?
Why did the Duke and Duchess of Sussex moan about their security being “cut off” also when, in fact, Prince Charles ensured most generously that no such thing occurred?
Why do ‘MeGain’ and her drip husband think they should be entitled to have the public pay for their security when they turned their backs on public duty for first “privacy” and then personal profit?
If “convenient with the truth” to her core ‘MeGain’ wanted such a “simple life,” why did she seek out a career first in acting and then get herself into a relationship with a member of the royal family?
Why, subsequently, did this woman with a desire for “ordinariness” then return to Los Angeles and sign deals with the likes of Disney, Netflix and Spotify?
Has ‘MeGain’ ever used body doubles of herself and her son, Archie?
Did the Duchess of Sussex make up that she had already been married to Prince Harry for three days when she walked down the aisle on 19th May 2018?
How many times has ‘MeGain’ actually been married? Twice or three times?
Alleged shoplifter turned moneybags man Richard Madeley can certainly now afford to actually pay for Krug champagne after landing a £500k pay day with ITV
Tellybox twerp Richard Madeley well and truly hit the jackpot this morning with revelations that he’s getting £200,000 to appear on ITV1’s I’m A Celebrity… Get Me Out Of Here! this month as well as an annual salary of £300,000 to present the same channel’s Good Morning Britain going forward from December.
First reported by the MailOnline’s Eve Buckland, news that motormouthed Madeley will replace Piers Morgan on Good Morning Britain “alongside a revolving team of guest presenters” was immediately condemned on social media. According to Buckland, Judy Finnigan’s annoying husband “is expected to host for two or three days a week.”
Assessing why the former This Morning co-host – whose cringeworthy car crash Alan Partridge-esque moments we feature below – decided to take on the role, a source commented:
“[Richard had a] heart to heart [with Judy]… [He] has always maintained he would never do GMB full-time, as he loves his life as it is.”
“But as the weeks have gone by, and he’s proven a constant hit with viewers, he’s really got into his stride and has been enjoying it more and more. He polls really well with fans and ratings have steadily been on the rise again over the past six months.”
“After a couple of meetings with ITV bosses, he was offered a full-time contract. And after consulting with his family, especially wife Judy, he decided ‘sod it’ – and to go for it.”
On Twitter, one user, Matthew Payne, declared of the channel’s decision: “Money for old rope. A sad, biased, ill-informed prat” whilst another, Rob McGuire, added: “[He’s just] a tactless, ignorant, rich, Tory clown.” Going further, quite rightly, John Slater concluded: “The bottom of the barrel has well and truly been scraped.”
‘Moneybags Madeley’ – whose washed-up wastrel wife is best known for necking rather than sipping her booze and flashing her tits at awards ceremonies – must be doing cartwheels. He’ll no longer have to worry about being accused of shoplifting champagne when heading down the booze aisle at Waitrose. The Krug’s most definitely now on him.
‘Moneybags Madeley’ – as he will henceforth also be known – is often compared to the inept comedy character broadcaster Alan Partridge. They not only look alike, but also are equally incompetent and tactless. Twitter users regularly condemn Romford, Essex born Madeley as “daft” and as a “pompous prat.”‘Moneybags Madeley’ once dressed up as Ali G to present ‘This Morning.’ It was later voted “one of the worst moments in television history.”In April this year, we revealed that the one-time classmate of ‘Spreadsheet Phil,’ the former Tory chancellor Philip Hammond, Madeley was being followed by Ghislaine Maxwell’s PR team on Twitter and that he’d written two columns in the ‘Daily Express’ in which he expressed “empathy” for the currently incarcerated alleged mucky madam.
‘Moneybags’ Madeley’s Finest Moments
On his son’s wedding
“There’s been so much angst about it… It’s been so choppy, but, yes, he got married and now we’ve got a daughter-in-law.”
Of his daughter
“Sorry Chloe, but you were an accident and you know it!”
In conversation with President Clinton
“I know what it’s like to be wronged by the press. I was once accused of shoplifting. Unlike you though, I knew I was innocent.”
Of women
“I’ve never met a single woman who’s happy with the way she looks, except Jordan, although I’ve never met her.”
Of alleged mucky madam Ghislaine Maxwell
“The sharks are circling; they smell blood in the water… Cynics would say the [FBI] agency is playing a long game, seeking to sway the minds of jurors in advance of Maxwell’s trial next year… Innocent until proven guilty? That honourable credo is in shreds.”
“Firstly, consider the conditions under which Ms Maxwell is being held. They are truly grim… It would take a heart of stone not to feel empathy for another human being suffering what amounts to mental torture. To coin a phrase: you wouldn’t treat a dog like that.”
“But it’s not sadism, or premature punishment ahead of a verdict. No; there’s calculated purpose behind this pitiless regime. But, here’s another prediction… it will. They’re trying to break her.”
On elephants
“So, are you telling me elephants are not born evil?”
To a man crying after paramedics saved his life
“Stop crying! This is supposed to make you happy! Anyway, after the break, the biggest dog in the UK. And he really is big. Don’t miss it!”
Showing sympathy for people who died in quicksand in Morecambe Bay
“Yes, what an awful way to die.”
In Nostradamus-like fashion on coronavirus and lockdowns
“We are being duped… [They are trying to] put the fear of God into the public. A great reckoning is coming.”
“There’s no point in running away and hiding from the virus.”
“We must learn to live with coronavirus.”
“If I had a bell, I would ring it… Only 59 people who have been double vaccinated and without any other serious underlying health problems, died from COVID, out of 50,000 deaths in England, this year.”
“I have to say that the majority of people are surprisingly forgiving [to government representative Steve Barclay], and are actually saying that they understand that the reason for some of the mistakes wasn’t malpractice but scientific ignorance – we didn’t know enough… But on the whole, you seem to be getting away with it – as far as our viewers are concerned.”
Of old women skipping
“There’s not many better things than seeing an older woman skipping.”
Of wanting to be black
“I hope when I’m reincarnated I come back black because you age better.”
To Keira Knightley
“Can we get some make up please, get Keira looking like a crack whore, she’d make a good crack whore.”
Of an autistic teenager
“The thing with Daniel [Wakeford, a ‘star’ on Channel 4’s ‘Undateables] is, he has autism but is very intelligent and as we can see extremely talented. Has Daniel always been autistic?”
To a caller
“I understand you have a little lad of 12. Is it a boy or a girl?”
Judy Finnigan’s decision to defend footballer Ched Evans – jailed for 5 years in 2012 for allegedly raping a 19-year-old – on ‘Loose Women’ in October 2014 shocked the nation. Responding at the time, Katie Russell, of Rape Crisis England and Wales remarked: “Judy Finnegan’s comments are really unfortunate and could potentially cause some hurt and distress to the many survivors of sexual violence who will inevitably have been watching ‘Loose Women’ and who will read and hear her views reported.”‘Moneybags’ Madeley and Finnigan are often pictured out boozing. Often, ‘Mummy Finnigan’ looks a little beyond pissed.
Whilst ‘Dorian Gray-esque’ Richard Madeley is best known for helping himself to champagne in supermarkets, his wife Judy Finnigan will be forever remembered for flashing at an awards ceremony in 2000.
Sarah Ferguson – better known as the Duchess of Pork – makes a prat of herself trying to stick a pig up her nose, but still has failed to confirm whether she repaid the loan she took from the croaked paedophile Jeffrey Epstein
In June 2017, Sarah, Duchess of York revealed: “One of the worst headlines said 82% [of the population] would rather sleep with a goat than Fergie. It’s never left me.”
Now, this week, returning to YouTube after using the medium to bang on about monsters there in September, the ‘Duchess of Pork’ went one further and shared a 4:16-minute video where she read a story titled There’s A Pig Up My Nose. In it, she seemed to be both drunk and disorderly.
Illustrating not only her childishness, this self-declared “real feminine woman” yet again showed herself to be totally out of touch with the fact that she would do best to silence herself at that time. Again, in response we remind this renegade royal that she still needs to answer a key question.
That question? Has she ever repaid the money she took from her live-in ex-husband ‘Randy Andy’s’ bestie Jeffrey Epstein?
Astonishingly, the ex-wife of Prince Andrew’s crackpot reading of ‘There’s A Pig Up My Nose’ by John Dougherty has been viewed over 26,000 on YouTube in just two days. It has been liked only by 223 of those viewers and disliked 190 times. Sensibly, for once, the duchess turned off comments as most would be utterly disparaging of this pointless wastrel woman.Spendthrift Sarah, Duchess of York has previous when it comes to banging on about monsters, as we reported in September 2020. Meanwhile, whilst she and Prince Andrew continue to bring shame on the royal family with their antics, their clearly close chum Ghislaine Maxwell rots in jail protecting them from taking responsibility for their very own actions.
“As long as it is hot, wet and goes down the right way, it’s fine with me.”
“With every smell, I smell food. With every sight, I see food. I can almost hear food. I want to spade the whole lot through my mouth at Mach 2. Basta!”
“We all sit round the table and eat together. Andrew and I believe in total parent unity. We’re best friends.”
“I would quite like to go on Dancing With The Stars. I would like somebody to teach me to tango. I do know the show and my children would be so proud of me.”
“I met [Prince Andrew] when I was 12, and I said: ‘I’m going to marry him.’”
“I left my marriage knowing I’d have to work. I have.”
“I didn’t want a divorce, but had to because of circumstance.”
“I wish we’d never got divorced. He and I both wish we’d never divorced, but we did. I wish I could go back and be the bride again, but I can’t.”
“I felt that I ostracised myself by my behaviour, by the past, by living with all the regrets of my mistakes, that I sort of wore a hair shirt and beat myself up most of the day thinking and regretting why did I make such a mistake. Why have I made so many mistakes?”
“You look at the devil in the face, which you do. Then you forgive, and you say: ‘OK, I’ve made almost a mistake that will never be forgotten,’ and forgive.”
“I was so out of control with desperation… I was looking for quick fixes in the places I wouldn’t normally look… I’ve been a huge overtrusting, idiotic, stupid woman that went to look for the perfect situation, and that’s all I can say really.”
Sarah Ferguson would do well to stop making a prat of herself at her time when her ex-husband – with whom she bizarrely still lives – is facing mounting public pressure over his friendship with the mucky madam Ghislaine Maxwell and a civil suit from his alleged victim Virginia Giuffre. Instead, true to form, she makes a video in which she tries to shove a stuffed toy pig up her hooter.
Ridiculously branded “America’s favourite royal” once by Conan O’Brien in an interview, ‘Fergie’ – who claimed most people use that name for their dogs – is capable only of making a fool of herself.
In claiming “Jeremy [Corbyn] is always right” the ultimate dumbo Diane Abbott MP yet again shows herself as an utter berk
This morning on BBC Radio 4’s Today programme, she-who-wears-two-left-shoes Diane Abbott MP ludicrously suggested “Jeremy [Corbyn] is always right” and claimed his replacement as leader of the Labour party, Sir Keir Starmer MP, talks “nonsense” and is “quite strange.”
In the wake of Andy McDonald MP quitting Sir Keir’s front bench, the former shagging partner of Jeremy Corbyn ridiculously rambled on about the minimum wage and ranted:
“Andy McDonald is a very nice man… He is personally very committed to fairness and justice.”
“I argue that there is no point clapping… You can’t live on claps… It’s no good clapping these people and then not being prepared to give them a decent minimum wage.”
“On the question of Keir Starmer, I think we have to look at some of his advisors. It now seems that Peter Mandelson is a top advisor to Keir Starmer.”
“We only have to look at Peter Mandelson’s life and times to understand where he stands in relation to the wealthy and the powerful.”
“I think Keir Starmer’s problems are his advisors and he needs to be listening to his own party and grass roots party members more.”
“Keir Starmer’s people are spinning it, but in 2017, people forget you know, Jeremy got more votes than any other Labour leader and, you know, if he hadn’t had most of the PLP attacking him night and day, he might possibly have won in 2017.”
Curiously, during the interview, the “intellectual giant” Diane Abbott got lucky and managed to swerve such issues as that of her own son’s criminality and her remarkable inability to add up. Whatever next for her? An appearance on Countdown? Anne Robinson would quake in her boots faced with this brainbox. Not.
Shame on her – She-who-cannot-use-a-calculator Diane Abbott MP is happy to be photographed with convicted racists such as Margaret Burke, a Labour councillor who disgustingly dressed up in a Nazi uniform and recruited youths to daub buildings with swastikas.Aside from being utterly inept with numbers, Abbott is someone who cannot intelligently engage in any kind of debate without resorting to blaming white people for whatever she believes to be wrong with any situation.
Illogical messages from Diane Abbott MP
Responding to be accused of not being able to add up:
“I do know my figures.”
“Of course, I think things through.”
“I’m here, of course I’m here. I’m doing a media interview, I’m going on to do another media interview. There’s no truth that I’m not in the media talking about what happened.”
“I think I’m Shadow Home Secretary.”
Diane Abbott on the cost of recruiting 10,000 police officers:
“If we recruit 10,000 police officers, men and women, over a four year period, we believe it will be about £300,000… Sorry, I mean, they will cost, it will cost, erm, about £80 million.”
“We will be paying them the average, it’s been thought through. Of course it’s been thought through.”
“What we said is, of course, we’ll find the money to recruit the 10,000 police people by cutting the, cutting the money… I think that would give us 170, erm, sorry… We would find the money by restoring levels of capital gains tax.”
On racism:
“The British invented racism.”
“White people love playing divide and rule. We should not play their game… I don’t think saying that is racist… It was part of a sequenced debate that I said that.”
“We need unity between black, Asian, minority ethnic and Muslim people – we need the maximum public show of unity. Because time after time, in the past 32 years, I’ve seen efforts of people to organise disrupted by white people.”
On dogs:
“I was a postman one Christmas and I developed a morbid fear of dogs.”
On her own marriage:
“I wanted my marriage to work, but it didn’t.”
On “outsiders” and “insiders”:
“Outsiders often have an insight than an insider doesn’t quite have.”
On being an MP:
“Being an MP is a good job, the sort of job all working-class parents want for their children – clean, indoors and no heavy lifting. What could be nicer?”
“I want power. I suppose that’s the story of my life – seeking power.”
“I’m in politics to be a voice for people who don’t have a voice.”
On the Kurdistan Workers’ Party:
“There is no difference between the PKK and ISIS.”
On the vile piece of toerag that is Naomi Campbell:
“I am a fangirl of Naomi Campbell.”
On why she wanted to be Labour’s candidate to be Mayor of London:
“One of my advantages, if I was Labour’s candidate, is that loads of people know me. I’m not just talking about politics – they’ve seen me on Come Dine With Me, they’ve seen me on Pointless.”
“I am not associated with the past.”
On women in Northern Ireland:
“Women in Northern Ireland are second class citizens.”
Diane Abbott on supporting the IRA:
“Defeat for the British state would be a great liberation. A defeat in Northern Ireland would be a defeat indeed.”
On supposedly changing her views on supporting the IRA:
“It was 34 years ago, I had a rather splendid afro at the time. I don’t have the same hairstyle, I don’t’ have the same views. It was 34 years on. The hairstyle is gone, some of the views are gone.”
On supposedly changing her views about MI5:
“At that time, I and a lot of people felt MI5 needed reforming. It has since been reformed and, of course, I would not call for its abolition now. That MI5 has gone. It’s been reformed, it’s a different MI5 and that’s why so many of us are able to support it now.”
Diane Abbott on Mao Zedong:
“I suppose some people will judge that on balance Mao did more good than harm… He led his country from feudalism, he helped to defeat the Japanese and he left his country on the verge of the great economic success they are having now. I was just putting the case for Mao.”
Insulting white mothers:
“West Indian mums will go to the wall for their children.”
On being a mother:
“I put being a mother ahead of being a politician.”
On abortion:
“Abortion is an issue of conscience for the Labour party.”
“I believe every abortion is a tragedy.”
Diane Abbott on sex:
“Of course, sex is great. We don’t have to pretend otherwise.”
On masculinity:
“There is a crisis of masculinity in Britain because of the pressures rapid economic and social change have placed on masculine identity. A generation of men are in transit and unclear of their social role. They are also under pressure to live up to pornified ideals.”
Diane Abbott on her decision to send her criminal son to a private school:
“[It was] indefensible and intellectually incoherent.”
“I’m not the only Labour MP who sent their child to public school, but I’m the only one who’s questioned about it.”
On parenting:
“When fast food is not a treat but a dietary staple, the children surf the Internet all day in dark corners of the room and are bombarded with the latest gadgets. Things replace parental standards.”
“Tackling obesity is key… Families are struggling against a tide of junk information on junk food.”
Diane Abbott on being demoted to the backbenches:
“I was a backbencher for a few years and there is an awful lot to do on the backbenches.”
On her political strategy:
“[I am going to stop Labour going into a] dead end.”
“In politics, the people I most despise are those who have no values.”
On defending the indefensible:
“You can’t defend the indefensible. Anything you say sounds self-serving and hypocritical.”
Diane Abbott on her many mistakes:
“You learn from your mistakes.”
On her future plans:
“I want to write a best-selling book.”
On being intensely disliked:
“[I am the] most abused of any Labour MP ever.”
And a final word from Diane Abbott:
“This is going round in circles… I’ve got nothing more to say, I’ve got nothing more to say.”
Alleged shoplifting tellybox twerp Richard Madeley is turned into a lookalike of inept comedy character broadcaster Alan Partridge
Yesterday on Twitter, an animated image did the rounds in which the incompetent and tactless television and radio presenter Richard Madeley morphed into looking just like the incompetent and tactless television and radio presenter Alan Partridge.
Both socially inept and both capable of offending their guests, the GIF circulated was brilliant in that both mouses-not-men have inflated senses of importance and fame. Equally, both shameless self-promoters are clearly bewildered that their audiences have an inability to recognise their self-created statures.
This morning, also on Twitter, the “cringeworthy” drunken old sop Judy Finnigan’s husband was once again trending. This time, Romford, Essex born ‘Madman Madeley’ was under fire over yet more stupid remarks about COVID-19 on ITV1’s Good Morning Britain. One user somewhat generously described him as “silly” and “daft” whilst another claimed him to be a “pompous prat” who’d “put them off their breakfast.” They are spot on and it is time that this twerp was taken off the telly.
“There’s been so much angst about it… It’s been so choppy, but, yes, he got married and now we’ve got a daughter-in-law.”
In conversation with President Clinton
“I know what it’s like to be wronged by the press. I was once accused of shoplifting. Unlike you though, I knew I was innocent.”
Of women
“I’ve never met a single woman who’s happy with the way she looks, except Jordan, although I’ve never met her.”
On elephants
“So, are you telling me elephants are not born evil?”
To a man crying after paramedics saved his life
“Stop crying! This is supposed to make you happy! Anyway, after the break, the biggest dog in the UK. And he really is big. Don’t miss it!”
In Nostradamus-like fashion on coronavirus
“We are being duped… [They are trying to] put the fear of God into the public. A great reckoning is coming.”
On lockdowns
“There’s no point in running away and hiding from the virus.”
Of old women skipping
“There’s not many better things than seeing an older woman skipping.”
Of wanting to be black
“I hope when I’m reincarnated I come back black because you age better.”
To Keira Knightley
“Can we get some make up please, get Keira looking like a crack whore, she’d make a good crack whore.”
Of an autistic teenager
“The thing with Daniel [Wakeford, a ‘star’ on Channel 4’s Undateables] is, he has autism but is very intelligent and as we can see extremely talented. Has Daniel always been autistic?”
To a caller
“I understand you have a little lad of 12. Is it a boy or a girl?”
In another Alan Partridge-esque moment earlier this month, Judy Finnigan’s husband banged on about the dangers of quicksand. Naturally, he had to make personal reference and claimed: “It got me once… More of that later.”In July, the ‘Dorian Gray of Daytime Telly’ was mocked as looking like the new person portrayed in the new Diana, Princess of Wales statue. At the time, the all-round berk was also lambasted after claiming he “suffered from PTSD after his son’s wedding.”‘Deranged Dicky’ once dressed up as Ali G to present ‘This Morning.’ It was later voted “one of the worst moments in television history.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rcx3FUarNiI&t=1s
Alleged shoplifter Madeley’s ‘mummy’ wife, Judy Finnigan, is best known for quaffing, flashing her boobs and falling off sofas. In October 2014, she inexcusably defended a footballer later convicted of rape by saying: “The rape wasn’t violent… He didn’t cause any bodily harm to the person… She had far too much to drink.”
Nikolay Kalinin on the disgraceful drips that are the Duke and Duchess of Sussex meddling in world politics and humanitarian crises
Pointless personalities are the last people in whole world who should have the right to comment on situations such as humanitarian crises, especially ones like the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, because such gestures are obviously fake.
Nevertheless, the two decided to respond to both the fall of Afghanistan to Taliban and the Haiti earthquake through a statement on the Archewell website.
In their missive, the couple wrote: “As we all feel the many layers of pain due to the situation in Afghanistan, we are left speechless…though we are not meant to live in a state of suffering, we, as a people, are being conditioned to accept it. It’s easy to find ourselves feeling powerless, but we can put our values into action – together.”
The couple also encouraged the readers to “join (them) in supporting a number of organisations doing critical work” and called on people in positions of power “to rapidly advance the humanitarian dialogues that are expected to take place this fall at multilateral gatherings such as the UN General Assembly and the G20 leaders’ summit.”
The royal rotters surprisingly, however, made no mention of Joe Biden, of whom they have been supportive in the past, and who has been seen as widely responsible for the ongoing chaos in Afghanistan due to the withdrawal of US troops.
GB News presenter Simon McCoy perfectly responded to the couple’s announcement by stating: “It’s a bit rich from the Duke and Duchess of Montecito to be telling us the world is in a mess.”
He then continued: “Sorry, only they would break their silence to tell us they are speechless… Do we need to talk about this? I get myself into trouble every time. What was I, ‘bitter and twisted,’ yesterday? I wonder what I’ll be today.”
I will have to admit however that Prince Harry has some say in this matter, since he himself served in Afghanistan twice and has provided support for British veterans. Still, we have to keep in mind that we’re talking about a person who’s living an extremely comfortable life in California and who previously stated that he and his wife were moving there to enjoy a more private existence.
If narcissistic ‘MeGain’ and her dopey drip of a husband truly do care about helping others less fortunate than them, why don’t they instead lobby the US Government into evacuating more Afghans – in particular women – fleeing from Taliban persecution? It is time also that these disgraceful drips stop trying to be like the Kardashians by constantly talking about their family drama and start behaving like decent public figures.
Prince Harry pictured in Afghanistan in 2013. On Wednesday, of the couple’s statement ‘The Mirror’s’ Liam Gulliver remarked: “Once again Meghan Markle and Prince Harry have whipped up a frenzy with the simple act of opening their mouths… Needless to say, the statement was ripped to shreds within hours of being published, with reports branding it a ‘woke word salad’ that was completely ‘irrelevant.’”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7enLIeQZyTM
The couple’s soppy statement was slammed also because it contained so many “Americanisms” – indicating it was written by ‘MeGain’ alone rather than her jointly with Prince Harry. Of it, the ‘Mirror’ observed: “Social media users claimed the use of American spelling throughout the statement suggested it was largely penned by the Duchess. Words such as ‘fall’ as opposed to ‘autumn,’ and the spelling of ‘organizations’ and ‘realize,’ were overtly American in the text. One person wrote: ‘If nothing else, the way ‘realise’ has been spelt shows this was certainly not written by Prince Harry,’ while a second noted: ‘And fall not autumn.’”
Associate of the family of mucky madam Ghislaine Maxwell, disgraced “reckless” ex-solicitor Malcolm Grumbridge, is exposed as “mysterious figure” behind a network of shell companies
According to The Law Society Gazette, Malcolm Grumbridge was “found guilty of a string of rule breaches” in December 2020. According to James Hurley in The Times this week, Grumbridge “has been a mysterious figure during his more than four-decade legal and business career… [who has been] at the heart of the Maxwells’ opaque finances, setting up and owning companies on behalf of the brothers Kevin and Ian Maxwell.”
A solicitor since 1978 but now removed from the roll, former sole practitioner Grumbridge – whom established around 150 companies in total – transferred a cash gift from a client to his personal account, “without the client being advised to take any independent legal advice.” He also was slammed for not accurately maintaining books, making inter-client loans without proper written authority and took cash withdrawals from client bank accounts in favour of himself.
Though the Solicitors Regulation Authority deemed Grumbridge’s conduct “serious enough to merit a fine of between £25,000 and £50,000,” this was “reduced to £2,000 [plus £1,350 in costs) on the basis of the admissions made at an early stage, Grumbridge’s ill health and his co-operation with the investigation.”
Summing up, “the SRA found [the solicitor] had ‘failed to behave in a way that maintains the trust the public places in him,’ which they described as ‘reckless,’” The Chiswick Calendar this week remarked.
Listed on the same page as a number for Scotland Yard in the infamous Ghislaine Maxwell – Jeffrey Epstein ‘little black book’ with a total of seven phone numbers – indicating his clear importance to the pugnacious pair – London, W4 based Grumbridge also “acted as a custodian of the house where Prince Andrew allegedly had sex with one of Jeffrey Epstein’s victims” and “set up multiple companies for the Maxwell family,” The Times also reported.
‘The Times’ has published their latest investigation into the Maxwell family’s curious business links over several days this week. Malcolm Grumbridge’s entry in the Ghislaine Maxwell – Jeffrey Epstein ‘little black book’ includes seven telephone numbers, an address and an email also.‘The Times’ this week suggested that Malcolm Grumbridge acted as “custodian” of 44 Kinnerton Street (AKA ‘Mucky Madam Ghislaine Maxwell’s Bathtub Bonk Pad’), Belgravia, London, SW1X 8ES, United Kingdom on behalf of the Maxwells family.The Maxwell family’s curious ‘network’ of associates and supporters currently also includes the PR peddler Brian Basham, the supposed ‘writer’ for ‘Politicalite’ Jay Beecher and the “memory lapsed” moron once accused of shoplifting, Richard Madeley.
As her trial in November approaches – if it actually happens this time round – Ghislaine Maxwell’s decidedly weird world continues to unravel. Her curious associations continue to be exposed and theories about her links to espionage, grubby business deals, rotten royalty and pugnacious politicians will now, more than ever, come to the fore.
