Category: Non-Sweaters

A Mucky Marriage – Will Prince Andrew Remarry Fergie? Did They Ever Repay The Paedo Jeffrey Epstein?

As “rumours” circulate that ‘Randy Andy’ and ‘Feckless Fergie’ might remarry again do the rounds, we again ask: “Did they ever repay loans taken from the paedophile Jeffrey Epstein?”

Yesterday, repeating a story that occasionally does the rounds, Entertainment Daily’s Julia Hunt asked: “Are Prince Andrew and Fergie to remarry in the wake of [his] sex scandal?”

Claiming the couple “have been plagued by rumours they could remarry recently,” former Bang Showbiz and Press Association freelance writer Hunt quoted a September 2021 feature by Vanity Fair’s royal ‘expert’ Katie Nicholl as her primary evidence. In it, Nicholl – best known for crashing Kate Moss’s 30^th birthday party at Claridge’s and discovering guests on the hokey-cokey – shared:

“Sarah and Andrew have been closer than ever in the past year. They still love and care for each other a great deal and have been living together during the pandemic.”

“It has rekindled something and I can see a second wedding happening if it [the Virginia Roberts Giuffre lawsuit] all goes Andrew’s way.”

Whilst Hunt’s update is clearly nothing but idle gossip produced without the citing of any new sources, last week the MailOnline’s Jack Wright revealed that the non-sweaty, Pizza Express loving mate of the alleged fraudster Bernie Ecclestone that is the Duke of York “barely leaves home.” He has been left wondering how his reputation has been left in tatters by his friendship with paedophile Jeffrey Epstein” and is said to be enduring a “period of intense self-reflection.”

Going further of a “virtual recluse” who has been left wondering “how everything went so wrong,” Wright turned to a previous article from The Telegraph and quoted yet another unnamed source, a “friend,” who stated:

“He has a much better understanding of the challenges he faces than at any other point in his life. He has a better sense of perspective – partly because he’s had these three years to reflect – to do the work, and to focus on his immediate family. The Duke of York of today is much more thoughtful and more mindful than he has ever been.”

“He acknowledges privately that Newsnight was by no means his finest hour.”

“The feeling that he has been treated abysmally is held by his nearest and dearest, but the duke’s attitude is more along the lines of: It is what it is.”

Clearly, though these ‘sources’ could be as made up as the spoof ‘Sir Michael Take CBE’ Twitter account that so successfully conned the MailOnline’s non-fact checking Elizabeth Haigh this morning (see below), things that seem unlikely do often occur in the royal family.

However, whilst the mainstream media may be asking if wedding bells will be again ringing for ‘Randy Andy’ and ‘Feckless Fergie,’ today we return to a question we will keep on asking of the money motivated duo and that is: “Did you ever repay the loans you took from the croaked paedophile Jeffrey Epstein?”

The friendship between Prince Andrew and Jeffrey Epstein dated back to the 1990s. In that time, both him and his ex-wife enjoyed hospitality and financial benefits from the since croaked paedophile without consideration of where the Ponzi scheming crook was actually getting his wonga from.

The Duke of York and Sarah, Duchess of York did not think to question where the money they happily grabbed came from and they did not question what the mucky madam Ghislaine Maxwell was doing with the young girls she so eagerly sex trafficked for Epstein either. How terribly convenient.

On Thursday 20th August 1992, the ‘Daily Mirror’ shared what they called “the pictures they didn’t want you to see.” In them, a topless Duchess of York was shown having her toes sucked in the South of France by a Texan millionaire named John Bryan. Of the incident, the ‘Mirror’ later reported: “Royal writer Richard Kay claimed in the ‘Daily Mail’ that he received a message via pager from Princess Diana the night before the photos hit the newspaper stands. Diana’s message was simple: ‘The redhead’s in trouble.’” If she were now to remarry the Duke of York, would it be accepted or would there be even more trouble?

This morning on Twitter, editor of ‘The Steeple Times’ Matthew Steeples shared a tweet about another example of ‘fake news’ shared by the ‘MailOnline’s’ Elizabeth Haigh. Accompanying a quoted tweet, Steeples observed: “The @MailOnline has been caught out by a spoof Twitter account. Sir Michael TAKE certainly TOOK some pillock on the paper. Retraction? Apology? I doubt it. #fakenews #dailymail #mailonline #youvebeenhad.” It is likely that ‘Entertainment Daily’s’ Julia Hunt has been similarly caught out with her story about the Duke of York and Sarah, Duchess of York considering remarriage, but who knows with ‘Needy’ and ‘Greedy’ … Stranger things could and have already happened.

The Weird Words of “Greedy” and “Needy” Sarah, Duchess of York

Of sex, her and goats: “One of the worst headlines said 82% [of the population] would rather sleep with a goat than Fergie. It’s never left me.”

Of the royal family: “They tried to put the little redhead in a cage.”

Of her life: “I have been in the gutter.”

Of food, family and dining: “As long as it is hot, wet and goes down the right way, it’s fine with me.”

“With every smell, I smell food. With every sight, I see food. I can almost hear food. I want to spade the whole lot through my mouth at Mach 2. Basta!”

“We all sit round the table and eat together. Andrew and I believe in total parent unity. We’re best friends.”

Of wanting to be a television star: “I would quite like to go on Dancing With The Stars. I would like somebody to teach me to tango. I do know the show and my children would be so proud of me.”

Of when she decided she wanted to bag a royal: “I met [Prince Andrew] when I was 12, and I said: ‘I’m going to marry him.’”

Of marriage, divorce and work: “I left my marriage knowing I’d have to work. I have.”

“I didn’t want a divorce, but had to because of circumstance.”

“I wish we’d never got divorced. He and I both wish we’d never divorced, but we did. I wish I could go back and be the bride again, but I can’t.”

Of her many, many mistakes: “I felt that I ostracised myself by my behaviour, by the past, by living with all the regrets of my mistakes, that I sort of wore a hair shirt and beat myself up most of the day thinking and regretting why did I make such a mistake. Why have I made so many mistakes?”

“You look at the devil in the face, which you do. Then you forgive, and you say: ‘OK, I’ve made almost a mistake that will never be forgotten,’ and forgive.”

“I was so out of control with desperation… I was looking for quick fixes in the places I wouldn’t normally look… I’ve been a huge, over-trusting, idiotic, stupid woman that went to look for the perfect situation, and that’s all I can say really.”

October 31, 2022
Farting Fergie Gets Wind

As Sarah, Duchess of York talks about “standing strong… when the winds get violent,” we again remind this toesucking twerp to answer the question: “Did she ever repay the croaked paedophile Jeffery Epstein?”

Sarah, Duchess of York needs to get herself some better advisers. At one-time represented by the PR peddler James Henderson – the former head honcho of Bell Pottinger and a man dragged through the quagmire of scandal after getting involved with some especially questionable South African clients – it is unknown who currently manages media matters for the live-in ex-wife of Prince Andrew, but whoever it is frankly deserves sacking.

Whilst The Steeple Times has repeatedly called upon the dimwitted duchess to explain if she ever repaid a financial loan and “other assistance” taken from the since croaked paedophile Jeffrey Epstein, this week, the mother of two daughters by a non-sweating man who paid a sum of circa £12 million to a woman he claimed prior to have never met has yet again stuck her cloven hooves in the proverbial.

In comments at the launch of the paperback version of her Mills & Boon novel Her Heart For A Compass, this washed-up wastrel prone to talking about farting on her YouTube channel also windily whimpered:

“The York family are a united front and we stand very strong and very tall. When the winds get violent, we keep standing.”

Going further and attempting to garner sympathy for the situations she herself has consistently created, the clearly delusional dimwit later added:

“I’ve always felt judged, which is why I support the LGBTQ+ community. I know what it’s like to be segregated. I’m 62 now and it still hurts, even now, when someone has a pop at me.”

Whilst most media turned their attention to other comments made at the book launch about the late Diana, Princess of Wales, again today it seems sensible to remind the lover of toesucking that the public would prefer her and the Duke of York to simply stick a sock in it.

With PR peddlers like these… Just as is the case with the mucky madam Maxwell’s choice of Brian Basham – who was involved with British Airways in the era of ‘Dirty Tricks’ against Sir Richard Branson’s Virgin Atlantic – as her spokesperson, the dimwit formerly known as Sarah Ferguson has never found a good PR advisor. James Henderson’s Bell Pottinger went into administration in September 2017 with a former colleague claiming: “It all went to his head. If he saw a picture of himself [in the paper], he was delighted.”

With friends like these… Happy to stand smirking with the now convicted mucky madam sex offender Ghislaine Maxwell in times prior, the Queen’s second son’s live-in ex-wife’s choice of friends serves only to illustrates only that she is either dim and a dunce or that she is happy to overlook deviancy in the hope of reeling in yet more wonga.

With toesuckers like these… On Thursday 20th August 1992, the ‘Daily Mirror’ shared what they called “the pictures they didn’t want you to see.” In them, a topless Duchess of York was shown having her toes sucked in the South of France by a Texan millionaire named John Bryan. Of the incident, the ‘Mirror’ later reported: “Royal writer Richard Kay claimed in the ‘Daily Mail’ that he received a message via pager from Princess Diana the night before the photos hit the newspaper stands. Diana’s message was simple: ‘The redhead’s in trouble.’”

With a temper like this and a willingness to take dubious money also… In 2018 and prior to all the drama she caused by taking dubious money from Epstein and Chinese and Turks, the mother of Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie had a temper tantrum on ’60 Minutes Australia’ when questioned about seeking out cash from what she clearly must have known to be illegitimate sources.

The Weird Words of “Greedy” and “Needy” Sarah, Duchess of York

Of sex, her and goats: “One of the worst headlines said 82% [of the population] would rather sleep with a goat than Fergie. It’s never left me.”

Of the royal family: “They tried to put the little redhead in a cage.”

Of her life: “I have been in the gutter.”

Of food, family and dining: “As long as it is hot, wet and goes down the right way, it’s fine with me.”

“With every smell, I smell food. With every sight, I see food. I can almost hear food. I want to spade the whole lot through my mouth at Mach 2. Basta!”

“We all sit round the table and eat together. Andrew and I believe in total parent unity. We’re best friends.”

Of wanting to be a television star: “I would quite like to go on Dancing With The Stars. I would like somebody to teach me to tango. I do know the show and my children would be so proud of me.”

Of when she decided she wanted to bag a royal: “I met [Prince Andrew] when I was 12, and I said: ‘I’m going to marry him.’”

Of marriage, divorce and work: “I left my marriage knowing I’d have to work. I have.”

“I didn’t want a divorce, but had to because of circumstance.”

“I wish we’d never got divorced. He and I both wish we’d never divorced, but we did. I wish I could go back and be the bride again, but I can’t.”

Of her many, many mistakes: “I felt that I ostracised myself by my behaviour, by the past, by living with all the regrets of my mistakes, that I sort of wore a hair shirt and beat myself up most of the day thinking and regretting why did I make such a mistake. Why have I made so many mistakes?”

“You look at the devil in the face, which you do. Then you forgive, and you say: ‘OK, I’ve made almost a mistake that will never be forgotten,’ and forgive.”

“I was so out of control with desperation… I was looking for quick fixes in the places I wouldn’t normally look… I’ve been a huge, over-trusting, idiotic, stupid woman that went to look for the perfect situation, and that’s all I can say really.”

May 18, 2022
“Stupid” Randy Andy – The No Longer Grand Old Duke of York

After Jeffrey Epstein victims’ lawyer Brad Edwards labels Prince Andrew “stupid” at CrimeCon in Las Vegas, ‘The Steeple Times’s’ Matthew Steeples looks forward to discussing the ratbag royal and mucky madam Ghislaine Maxwell’s fate at CrimeCon London in June

On Sunday, The Sun quoted Brad Edwards, Esq. – a crusading lawyer for 69 victims of the croaked paedophile Jeffrey Epstein and a founding partner of Fort Lauderdale, Florida based Edwards Pottinger LLC – as describing Prince Andrew as “stupid” and someone who is “going to have to live a life of ridicule for a long time.”

Going further and making somewhat punchy comments to the paper’s Alex Diaz whilst at the recent CrimeCon event in Las Vegas, Mr Edwards added:

“How stupid can you possibly be to remain friends with Jeffrey Epstein after he was labeled a sex offender and he came out of jail? Have you lost your mind? I imagine the Queen has bent him over her knee a couple of times.”

“He paid a lot of money to settle a case and try to make up for what he allegedly did many years ago.”

“I just wish that in the process, Virginia didn’t have to take the media hit that she did because he was trying to cover his own butt.”

“He should have just accepted responsibility and moved on.”

“A lot of people would hope that the Queen had banished him, but if your own mom’s not going to love you then nobody will.”

Edwards – who was honoured by the New York Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children in November 2020 – was targeted by Epstein and in April 2020 told Page Six that during meetings at a Starbucks in Boca Raton, Florida, the financier told him: “Brad, if you keep prosecuting me in this way, somebody’s going to get hurt.”

Page Six continued: “[Edwards] revealed: “[Epstein] put my family under surveillance, when I called him on it and said, ‘Hey, you put my family under surveillance, you told me you weren’t a bad guy,’ he said, ‘No, no, I just took you off the surveillance – I didn’t realise I had done that. I have a bunch of people who work for me, so see I’m the good guy, I’ll treat you fairly, let’s settle this case.’”

The attorney refused to settle and in due course Epstein was “finally forced to make a full apology in a letter read in court in 2018.”

Continuing exploration of such matters, The Steeple Times’ Matthew Steeples will spend an hour discussing his research into the crimes and connections of not only Jeffrey Epstein but also Ghislaine Maxwell at CrimeCon UK in London on 12^th June with YouTube True Crime Channel host and author Shaun Attwood and his podcaster co-host Jennifer Hopkins.

Delving also into Attwood’s 2021 book Who Killed Epstein? and Prince Andrew’s recent settlement with Virginia Roberts, in addition, the trio will turn in the wake of last week’s nigh on 4-hour documentary epic Untouchable take questions about the antics of another royal rotter – the monstrous paedophile and necrophiliac, Sir Jimmy Savile – given that show has attracted an astonishing 120,000 views since it premiered.

Speaking of the forthcoming event, Matthew Steeples remarked Tuesday:

“I am looking forward to being able to return to CrimeCon London after speaking there in September 2021 on the subject of the pension pot plunderer’s deviant daughter and her coterie of evil cohorts.”

“Last year, it was great to spend time with everyone from the punchy storyteller behind the Hunting Ghislaine podcast, John Sweeney, to crime enthusiasts who’d travelled from far and wide because of their interest in the Epstein-Maxwell case and others both Shaun and I’ve covered including the incarceration of Jeremy Bamber and ‘missing’ Madeleine McCann.”

“Last year’s audience for our segment was somewhat small given the size of the room, but with the anticipation of sentencing of Maxwell on the 28^th June and a much larger space, I look forward to sharing the stories of my experiences with the key players, both for and against this wicked, now rightly shamed socialite, on 12^th June.”

Matthew Steeples will be discussing the sordid stories of Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, Prince Andrew and Sir Jimmy Savile with Shaun Attwood and Jennifer Hopkins at CrimeCon UK on 12^th June from 11am to 12 noon at the Leonardo Royal Hotel & Spa, St Paul’s, 10 Godliman Street, EC4V 5AJ.

To book tickets to CrimeCon London 2022 partnered by CBS Reality, click here and use the discount code ATTWOOD to get 10% off ticket prices. The weekend event runs over two days from 11^th to 12^th June 2022.

The Fort Lauderdale based lawyer for Jeffrey Epstein’s victims, Brad Edwards, has been pursuing the cases of those sexually molested by the taxi driver turned teacher turned sex offender on a pro bono basis for the past decade.

Shaun Attwood with co-host Jennifer Hopkins will discuss “two of the biggest stories in true crime” on 12th June 2022 between 11am and 12 noon at the UK’s number one gathering of those interested in true crime in Britain and beyond.

May 10, 2022
Give Up Ghislaine

After her attempt to get a retrial was rightly rejected and the BBC’s ‘House of Maxwell’ reveals that she used to make ‘miaow’ noises at her late father, it is now time for the mucky madam Ghislaine Maxwell to give up and to also do the right thing – name names and finally tell the truth

In response to her conviction, Prince Andrew’s ‘bestie’ and supposed sometime lover Ghislaine Maxwell continues to show only audacity and arrogance. She clearly is yet to accept it, but thankfully yesterday Judge Alison J. Nathan decided otherwise.

Now with news that she won’t be getting a retrial in spite of the antics of the juror Scotty David, it is time that this French born 60-year-old convicted sex offender fessed up the identities of her clearly many co-conspirators.

Whilst the powerful and the privileged no doubt connected to her currently sit worrying in the mansions in case ‘The Bouncing Czech’s’ deviant daughter does decide to get a reduced sentence on the basis of finally being cooperative, for now still, it seems that this course of action remains unlikely.

In Oxford educated Ghislaine – and one can most definitely see that from the Westchester Summit Talk she gave in 2014 – there is most definitely a very intelligent woman, but there is also a monster with a moral compass that has been completely stir fried.

Some, amongst them the late Lord Hartwell’s beyond bonkers daughter Eleanor Berry, might say that Miss Maxwell was abused by her father before becoming an abuser herself. Some might add that this explains why she turned to the dark side and linked up with warped paedophiles like Jean-Luc Brunel and Jeffrey Epstein.

Others, however, rightly point to the pension pot plunderer’s favourite child being motivated by money and having used these cretinous individuals as her own personal money funnel and them having used her to get to her address book.

On Monday, BBC Two air the first episode of their new House of Maxwell three-part documentary series. Featuring previously unseen footage of Robert Maxwell on his yacht before his death, the corporation have teased of the programme:

“Secret recordings. Criminal trials. Mystery deaths. Like father. Like daughter. One family. 50 years of scandal.”

“Never-heard-before secret recordings of executives within his businesses show the rising panic as they start to realise there are huge holes in Robert’s company finances. We see the beginnings of a scandal which will change the lives of all of the Maxwells forever.”

“Told through intimate testimony and exclusive never-before-seen sources of the archive, House Of Maxwell is a story woven through British and American society and culture and will offer a unique window into a world of money, sex, privacy and power across half a century.”

The programme’s producer, Colin Barr of Expectation, added:

“It’s hard to imagine a story with a more dramatic rise or disastrous fall than the story of the Maxwell family. It’s a story that is both intimate and epic and one which speaks to half a century of business, politics and celebrity. This is a true-life family drama on an extraordinary scale, and we’re incredibly privileged to be producing it for BBC Two.”

In clips of the show available on the programme’s official site prior to it airing, the chirping crooner Christopher Mason is heard to turn on a woman he used to describe as a “friend” and remarks that the way in which she and Epstein lived to be “profoundly weird.”

Other snippets feature the Serious Fraud Office raids on the Mirror Group offices and the company’s secretary Carol Bragoli complaining about “great big brutes of guys with screwdrivers levering open filing cabinets.” Of the raid, Bragoli adds: “They were thugs. They were awful. I hated them. The whole thing turned really nasty after that.”

In a clip from the BBC series, the TerraMar Project founder sits in a New York’s Central Park in the 1990s and is filmed telling a blonde presenter: “You know, other peoples’ lives are very interesting too. I like to have the opportunity to ask them questions. I don’t like to be the one people are asking questions of… I don’t feel any smaller or lesser than I was before. I am me.” Clearly, this now convicted sex offender now has many questions still to answer; whether she ever actually does answer them remains to be seen.

In another clip, the pension pot plunderer’s secretary Carol Bragoli recounts a telephone conversation between Robert Maxwell and his daughter Ghislaine during which they kept making “miaow, miaow” noises to one another. She adds: “He definitely had a different relationship with Ghislaine than the others.”

Jeffrey Epstein and his one-time lover turned coconspirator will forever be remembered in history as evil sex offenders. Their grubbiness truly knew no bounds and their evil treatment of their victims speaks volumes as to their psycho personalities.

Matthew Steeples remarked on Twitter of the retrial denial this morning: “[If she] had any decency, she would now name names. She is, however, just like her late father – deviant to her core – and thus remains as arrogant as ever. May this wicked, evil woman rot in the clink to the end of her days.”

https://youtu.be/_9FkaaFDe7c

April 2, 2022
Funding A Fool

That the fool Prince Andrew and his feckless live-in ex-wife were prepared to accept £1.3 million from a Turkish conman illustrates how low their moral compasses truly are

It may be April Fools’ Day, but today and every day both the non-sweating, Pizza Express loving Prince Andrew and his toe sucking loving wife Sarah, Duchess of York opt to play the role of cringeworthy court jesters.

With news that the Queen’s rotten-to-his-core and national embarrassment second son has been paid £1.1 million and his live-in ex-wife has been paid £225,000 in addition by a Turkish conman comes further proof that here is a couple completely lacking in any kind of moral compass.

According to The Sun, a former Goldman Sachs banker named Selman Turk and his associate Nebahat Isbilen made “suspicious” payments to the pair as part of a £40 million fraud. It is alleged the sum “would pay for a help with a passport” and in return Mr Turk got to be given an award at St James’s Palace by the prince at one of his Pitch@Palace events.

Speaking of yet another especially sordid situation, a spokesman for the Duchess of York took the usual dopey excuse line and remarked: “The duchess was completely unaware of the allegations that have since emerged against Mr Turk. She is naturally concerned by what has been alleged against him.”

Aside from the fact also that feckless ‘Fergie’ has still to confirm whether or not she ever repaid loans she took from the since croaked paedophile Jeffrey Epstein and also from Chinese investors, Prince Andrew also managed to make a spectacle of himself when escorting his beleaguered mother down the aisle at Westminster Abbey this week. After the event, unsurprisingly, the Internet turned on the randy royal and condemned his presence as a totally inappropriate distraction.

In all of his actions the Duke of York – someone who it must also be noted paid circa £12 million to a woman he’d previously claimed never to have actually met – simply continues to illustrate how out of touch he is with the reality of the situations he has himself created. Here is a moron-not-a-man with an ego the size of Russia and an out-of-touch-with-reality buffoon clearly incapable of accepting what he truly must now do: Disappear into obscurity and never again expect to have an ounce of respect from a single member of the public.

Shame on Prince Andrew and shame on those that continue to enable this festering turd by continuing to give him such significant chunks of change.

Pictured top – ‘Randy Andy’ thinks himself a bit of a card whilst the wastrel formerly known as Sarah Ferguson likes to go on YouTube to read books about farting. This pair of royal rotters ought to be thoroughly ashamed of themselves, but of course they’re anything but sorry about their continually appalling antics.

After Prince Philip’s memorial, the Internet wash awash with individuals commenting on how utterly shocked they were with the Queen’s selfish second son’s decision to put himself centre stage at the event.

Even the tediously tepid Greta Thunberg got a mention.

Grubby groper ‘Randy Andy’ should come to realise that his presence at any public event is not required. Here is someone whose actions have brought shame and disgrace on his family and here is someone whose proximity to convicted sex traffickers Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein and accused sex abusers such as Peter Nygård illustrate how tawdry, tacky and tasteless he truly is. It is now time only for one thing: Get this right royal rotter gone.

Matthew Steeples of ‘The Steeple Times’ took to Twitter and suggested that this “festering turd” needed “to be flushed.” Here is a national embarrassment and ‘bestie’ of the coffin dodger Bernie Ecclestone whose moral compass has been frankly stir fried.

April 1, 2022
Public Randy vs. Private Harry

Whilst privacy obsessed yet decidedly public when for profit Prince Harry won’t be attending his grandfather’s memorial, his now disgraced uncle Prince Andrew surprisingly will be rocking up for this clearly public occasion

A mouthy mouse-not-a-man who is also a mouthy mouse-not-a-man who doesn’t sweat who eventually willingly paid £12 million to a woman he previously claimed he’d never met has announced that he is going to be making his first public appearance since making his out of court settlement on 29^th March.

Pizza Express loving Prince Andrew (or ‘Randy’ his few remaining chums), a spokesman this morning confirmed, will now attend the memorial service for Prince Philip next week and of this the Daily Star’s Benedict Tetzlaff-Deas reported:

“The decision regarding Andrew’s attendance was understood to depend on whether she considered the service a family event or an official engagement… The decision regarding Andrew’s attendance was understood to depend on whether she considered the service a family event or an official engagement.”

Responding on Twitter, one user, Anthony Akhurst, commented: “Why is this moron still free and not behind prison bars?” whilst another, Northern Lass, pointedly added: “Be interesting to see who doesn’t snub him.”

A rare and more sympathetic voice, however, came in the form of one Graham Marshall. He tweeted: “We allow prisoners to attend such events. Prince Andrew should attend Duke of Edinburgh’s memorial service – have some humanity.” It would be most interesting to know what Mr Hawick would have to say if introduced to the many, many, many victims of the Duke of York’s convicted criminal besties Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.

Meanwhile, in a very clear snub in spite of the fact he’s managing to travel to the Netherlands for another publicity stunt, the drip that is Prince Harry will not be attending his grandfather’s memorial service and nor will his ‘Modern Day Mrs Simpson’ wife, the meddling minx that was formerly known as Meghan Markle.

Pictured top running and sweating (left) and guffawing (right) – The arrogant and avaricious Duke of York is undoubtedly man who has brought the royal family into its most embarrassing moment in modern history. This shameless friend of the coffin dodging Putin apologist Bernie Ecclestone would do best to disappear and disappear forever.

Though the public shame of Prince Andrew seemed to be complete, his decision to return to attend a public event is going to distract from that very event. Yet again, this self-centred twerp has put himself before his mother and siblings and though some would say he has very right to be there, if he had any sense he’d pay his respects privately instead given the sordid mess he himself created.

Rather than focusing on duty, both the Duke of York and his feckless thicko live-in ex-wife, the former Sarah Ferguson, have spent their lives holidaying and personal profiteering. Their associations with people of dubious backgrounds including dictators, paedophiles and crooks – many of whom they’ve holidayed with – always comes back to bite them in their not so sorry arses.

The age and name of a young lady the Queen’s second and favourite son cavorted with and kissed in the sea on yet another yachting jolly in Corsica in 2011 remains the subject of much discussion amongst critics of this rotten royal.

Pictured at Ascot with his “very, very close friend,” the Oxford educated Kazakh businesswoman and socialite Goga Ashkenazi, the Duke of York’s connections have often been called out. Defending him, Ashkenazi told the ‘Evening Standard’ in April 2012: “I told Andrew not to worry, that he’d done nothing wrong, and that it was being blown out of proportion. Of course, he knows it was unwise to fraternise with this Epstein character, and it was silly to be photographed with his arm around Epstein’s masseuse [Virginia Roberts]. But I know Andrew as a lovely, lovely man – kind-hearted, impeccably behaved and honourable – and I’m quite sure that at the time he had no idea that she was underage or anything more than a masseuse to Epstein.” Going further of her role in selling the former marital home of her mate, Sunninghill Park, at a price grossly over-inflated to a decidedly questionable chap who’d also been her lover, without a jot of regret, she added: “It was never bought for personal use. The plan is to convert it into a charitable school for bright Kazakh children who can then try for the top British universities.” That turned out to be a bag of bilge given there is now another naff mansion standing on the site.

Prince Andrew to attend Duke of Edinburgh's memorial service – reports https://t.co/KFyLUuaKQm Why is this moron still free and not behind prison bars.
— anthony akhurst (@akhurst_anthony) March 22, 2022

https://twitter.com/NorthernLass72/status/1506185665251270657

We allow prisoners to attend such events. Prince Andrew should attend Duke of Edinburgh's memorial service – have some humanity https://t.co/qg5uX4teyo
— Graham Marshall 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 (@CottackMarshall) March 22, 2022

Of course Prince Andrew should attend Prince Philips memorial service, he was his father fgs.

If it offends the Virginia Giuffre supporters, tough.
— sandieshoes 🇬🇧 (@sandieshoes) March 22, 2022

March 22, 2022
Facts & Feckless Fergie

As birdbrained Sarah, Duchess of York goes on a moneymaking tour in America, this debtor to croaked paedophile Jeffrey Epstein’s tweet about her thoughts on “facts” come back to bite her in her not so regal arse

Sarah, Duchess of York is most certainly reliable; reliable to call a royal ruckus when one most definitely is not required.

With the ex-husband she lives with well and truly named and shamed over the fact that he’s had to pay circa £12 million to a lady he previously claimed to have never have met, one would have thought a PR peddler like James Henderson might have advised ‘Feckless Fergie’ to put a sock in it, but clearly he’s too terrified of the red-headed rotter to do such.

Instead, aside from embarking on a road trip across America peddling her tepid wares, Prince Andrew’s somewhat simple sidekick took to Twitter to share a quote attributed to HRH Crown Prince of Johor. It read: “We live in a world today that facts no longer matter. It’s all about a game of perception. That is very sad and scary.”

As of date, the mother of Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie hasn’t followed up with a tweet about the fact that she took a loan from the since croaked paedophile Jeffrey Epstein and never confirmed whether she repaid that. Unsurprisingly also, she hasn’t had a response yet from Virginia Roberts Giuffre confirming the fact that she clearly did have not-so-royal relations with the Duke of York at Ghislaine Maxwell’s Belgravia bonk pad on 10^th March 2001.

The former Sarah Ferguson has taken advice from some pretty awful people over the years – amongst them (pictured) convicted sex trafficker and pension pot plunderer’s daughter, Ghislaine Maxwell, “Chanel-clad” pointy finger waver and “charity” tinbanger Catherine Meyer (now known as Baroness Meyer of Nine Elms in the London Borough of Wandsworth) and disgraced PR peddler and ex-Bell Pottinger head honcho James Henderson.

Elsewhere, ‘New Idea’ reported: “Prince Andrew tells Fergie: ‘Be Quiet’” and quoted an unnamed source as saying: “Andrew doesn’t get on social media anymore – he had to delete his Duke of York accounts because of trolls – so it took a few hours for it to get back to him about what Fergie had posted. When he found out, he was furious… Not because he disagrees, but more because he knew it would awaken the beast of everyone talking about him. He wants her to get off social media too for a while, but there’s no way she’ll do it. She loves having a voice of her own on Twitter and Instagram and she’ll fight him on this one. Things have been pretty icy in the York household this weekend.”

Sarah, Duchess of York is currently on a tinbanging tour in America and most in Britain would take the view: “America: You’re welcome to her, please don’t send her back.”

The Weird Words of “Greedy” and “Needy” Sarah, Duchess of York

Of sex, her and goats: “One of the worst headlines said 82% [of the population] would rather sleep with a goat than Fergie. It’s never left me.”

Of the royal family: “They tried to put the little redhead in a cage.”

Of her life: “I have been in the gutter.”

Of food, family and dining: “As long as it is hot, wet and goes down the right way, it’s fine with me.”

“With every smell, I smell food. With every sight, I see food. I can almost hear food. I want to spade the whole lot through my mouth at Mach 2. Basta!”

“We all sit round the table and eat together. Andrew and I believe in total parent unity. We’re best friends.”

Of wanting to be a television star: “I would quite like to go on Dancing With The Stars. I would like somebody to teach me to tango. I do know the show and my children would be so proud of me.”

Of when she decided she wanted to bag a royal: “I met [Prince Andrew] when I was 12, and I said: ‘I’m going to marry him.’”

Of marriage, divorce and work: “I left my marriage knowing I’d have to work. I have.”

“I didn’t want a divorce, but had to because of circumstance.”

“I wish we’d never got divorced. He and I both wish we’d never divorced, but we did. I wish I could go back and be the bride again, but I can’t.”

Of her many, many mistakes: “I felt that I ostracised myself by my behaviour, by the past, by living with all the regrets of my mistakes, that I sort of wore a hair shirt and beat myself up most of the day thinking and regretting why did I make such a mistake. Why have I made so many mistakes?”

“You look at the devil in the face, which you do. Then you forgive, and you say: ‘OK, I’ve made almost a mistake that will never be forgotten,’ and forgive.”

“I was so out of control with desperation… I was looking for quick fixes in the places I wouldn’t normally look… I’ve been a huge, over-trusting, idiotic, stupid woman that went to look for the perfect situation, and that’s all I can say really.”

March 14, 2022
“Wild Times” With ‘Randy Andy’

As Prince Andrew’s notches on the bedpost non-counter Michael Wynne-Parker talks of their “wild times” bedding birds, we suggest the randy royal might do better to silence his chirping chums including ‘Lady Herpes’ also

Stripped even of his honorary membership of the Royal Dornoch Golf Club in Sutherland in what was described as a “welcome move given that certain standards of behaviour are expected of members,” Prince Andrew has now been reduced to adding an unnamed “source who served with him in the Falklands War” and the controversial PR peddler Michael Wynne-Parker to his rotten roster of spinners as he tries to find a way to solve the problem of his having to pay circa £12 million ($16 million, €14.3 million or درهم59.1 million) to a woman he claimed to have never met.

Yesterday, in a feature by news reporter Patrick Hill titled “Prince Andrew ‘broken’ after legal settlement with sex accuser, old pal reveals” the Mirror reported that the Queen’s second son is in “low spirits” and is “down.”

Going further, the individual suggested that letting him remain a Vice Admiral would “cheer him up” and remarked: “If he wants to dress up once in a while in a naval uniform, then let him.”

“He was actually not a bad person when I knew him. He had a few entitlement issues but that is to be expected.”

“His reputation is in tatters, his public life is over. He is a walking embarrassment.”

“Frankly, my view is let him keep the rank of Vice Admiral. He served in the Royal Navy in the Falklands War and this was bestowed upon him by the Queen. It’s effectively the same as an honorary degree.”

“He hasn’t been convicted of anything. I have no idea whether he is guilty or innocent, so I think he has paid quite a heavy price.”

Upping the ante in speaking with The Mail on Sunday’s Emily Prescott, “one of Prince Andrew’s most steadfast friends” 76-year-old Michael Wynne-Parker – an individual linked also to the cash for honours scandal that has inveigled Prince Charles and Michael Fawcett also – suggested that he and his mate used to have “such a wild time with party girls… that it would be no surprise if [the Duke of York had forgotten them].”

Fecklessly tattling further, the notably rambunctious Wynne-Parker made out that he and his promiscuous Pizza Express-loving chum liked to notch up numbers in the bedroom department in stating:

“In those days we were having almost nightly parties in Tramp or whatever. We were going to these clubs and there would be 20 beautiful girls. Have a dance with this one, have a dance with that one. And then you’d end up in bed with that one. I’m sorry to say you might not even remember that person – you know, even five years later.”

“Even if he had met [Virginia Roberts Giuffre] all those years ago, it’s very possible he completely forgot.”

“We were living in wild times in those days. Wild times.”

Asked also about why clearly the very randy royal brought up his “non-sweating” situation when interviewed, Wynne-Parker was more simple iand just noted: “I don’t know why he brought that up. He must regret that.”

Meanwhile elsewhere, showing herself yet again a birdbrained desperado, the noxious nuisance that is Lady Victoria Hervey – a woman rejected as a lover by both sexual gadabouts Jeffrey Epstein and Prince Andrew – managed to get herself a few column inches in the MailOnline. In a feature by Latoya Gayle in which it was claimed the ‘aristoprat’ was contrastingly “in good spirits,” it was noted that the pointless prattler had “wrongly accused [Virginia Roberts Giuffre] of lying” and “even contradicted herself.”

Adding to the evidence against the disaster area nicknamed ‘Lady Herpes,’ Gayle cuttingly concluded: “It appears Lady Victoria is mistaken with her dates.” Perhaps it’s now time for this particular harridan to sign-up on Tinder.

Pictured top – A woman furiously thumping on the window of a somewhat astonished looking Prince Andrew in Windsor (left) and his tub-thumping bestie Michael Wynne-Parker enjoying “wild times” with a whisky (right).

The Duke of York (pictured guffawing with the equally greedy “Chanel-clad” grabber Baroness Meyer) has previously made no secret of his dislike for the media and has been known even to suggested he disliked “those ***** journalists who poke their noses everywhere.”

Speaking in an episode of ‘True Royalty’s’ ‘The Royal Beat’ the ‘Mirror’s’ royal editor Russell Myers remarked: “Speaking to friends of his this week – they say he still feels he has a lot to offer public life again. I still believe that he is the only person on the planet that believes that [apart from] possibly Fergie and possibly the Queen. He is only 61, but it is impossible to see how he could have any future.”

Reduced increasingly in the circle of friends he can rely upon, the Duke of York and his batshit bonkers live-in ex-wife have been reduced to inviting even the coffin dodger Bernie Ecclestone round to Royal Lodge, Windsor. Whether the ancient skinflint takes a Sloppy Giuseppe or two from Pizza Express for such nights-in remains unknown.

“Right snob” for no good reason Lady Victoria Hervey continues to try to live off the nonsense she peddles about THAT notorious photograph supposedly taken by Jeffrey Epstein on 10th March 2001 at 44 Kinnerton Street, Belgravia home of the royal, Virginia Roberts and Ghislaine Maxwell. Pictured in Los Angeles, California looking decidedly dog-earred, this trashy desperado has now been shown to no utterly nothing about truth about this or frankly any other matter.

Teetotal Prince Andrew continues to be deservedly mocked online. This national laughing stock should now just fade into the shadows, but clearly that’s not on this notoriously pompous pillock’s agenda.

https://twitter.com/ApePitagorica/status/1496863276256440326

February 27, 2022
Vicky Vanishes – Lady Victoria Hervey Quits Twitter

Party pest and piffle peddling pillock Lady Victoria Hervey vanishes from Twitter; the mouthy moron likes to criticise others, yet clearly can’t take criticism herself

First, earlier this month, in spite of having more front than Harrods and a mouth larger than Russia, prattling pillock and daughter of a convicted thief Lady Victoria Hervey blocked The Steeple Times on Twitter.

Clearly incapable of taking criticism on the chin, in spite of happily taking media money to peddle piffle about Prince Andrew and Virginia Giuffre, cowardy custard Lady Victoria has now gone further and closed down her Twitter account completely. She did so after being confronted by The Mail on Sunday’s Charlotte Griffiths about her pestering the crusading author of Ghislaine Maxwell: An Unauthorized Biography Kirby Sommers on the social media platform.

Responding to a request from Griffiths about why she had contacted Sommers “seeking dirt” on Virginia Giuffre, ‘Lady Herpes’ abruptly answered: “Mistook her for someone else. I never use Twitter. Had an intern do it, hence all the typos. I don’t write like that.” Now, Vicky dear: Please try pulling the other one; next!

To purchase a copy of ‘Ghislaine Maxwell: An Unauthorized Biography’ by crusading author Kirby Sommers, click here.

Lady Victoria Hervey blocked ‘The Steeple Times’ account and that of Matthew Steeples on Twitter also in early February 2022. If asked, she’d probably claim that she got her no doubt unpaid intern to have done that for her too.

By Sunday 20th February, the @Thebritishladyv Twitter account appeared with the message: “This account doesn’t exist.” No doubt the aristoprat capable of leaving a trail of debts amounting to £350,000 when her Knightsbridge knicker flogging boutique went under, got her intern – if he or she actually exists – to do the closing down for her.

https://twitter.com/KirbySommers/status/1493201393439719429

On 14^th February, Kirby Sommers shared the begging letter sent to her by Lady Victoria Hervey on her Twitter feed. In it, the birdbrained blonde asked: “Wondering if you have any diet [sic] for me on Maria or Viginia.” She clearly meant “dirt,” but yet again illustrated that she most definitely should never enter a spelling bee contest.

Elsewhere on Instagram (a technological medium she seems capable of using herself apparently), illustrating that she remains in cahoots with Ghislaine Maxwell’s PR team the lover of threesomes included a link to Jay Beecher’s TheMaxwellFiles.com – a website filled with utter gibberish about the case against ‘The Bouncing Czech’s’ deviant daughter. She also referenced a story from ‘The Mail on Sunday’ by Sharon Churcher – the journalist who first revealed the picture of Prince Andrew, Ghislaine Maxwell and Virginia Roberts to the world in February 2011 – and aside from suggesting “[she’s] lucky it’s 2022 or she would be hung for TREASON” added: “These people are the bottom feeder gutter rats.”

In other Instagram story posts, the “toff you’ll never see on ‘Mastermind’” demanded that Ghislaine Maxwell be released “until her new trial date” and claimed that the mucky madam sex trafficker “isn’t safe” in the Metropolitan Detention Center. The one-time lover of both Prince Andrew allegedly and Jeffrey Epstein definitely awaits sentencing on 28th June 2022 and aside from being monitored continually, has the luxury of a floor of the prison to herself and all sorts of privileges. The only thing this wicked criminal hasn’t got is Krug on tap. Diddums.

In June 2020, further illustrating the vileness of her tongue, Lady Victoria – who has been known also to come out with clangers including “I’m not stupid. I’m not a dumb model” and “[I aim to become] the next Kate Winslet – but with class” – was deservedly lambasted after she attacked the Black Lives Movement in spite of her own ancestors having been abolitionists. After ‘The Steeple Times’ first and the ‘Mail on Sunday’ subsequently named and shamed her, she deleted her clearly highly offensive Intagram post, but it remains clear that she still doesn’t realise what an utter berk she truly is.

February 20, 2022
The Truth About THAT 2001 Photo
Matthew Steeples questions the murky motives of those questioning the authenticity of THAT 2001 photo of Prince Andrew, Virginia Roberts and Ghislaine Maxwell; it is time that the personal profiteer Lady Victoria Hervey was called out for the fake that she is and it is time to remind the public that it is Ghislaine Maxwell and her avaricious associates who’ve actually been exposed for faking photos

In the 2019 interview he gave to the BBC’s Emily Maitlis, Prince Andrew didn’t say that the March 2001 photograph of him, Ghislaine Maxwell and the young lady then known as Virginia Roberts at the since convicted mucky madam sex offender’s then home at 44 Kinnerton Street in Belgravia, London, SW1 was a fake.

Subsequently, of the image, Maxwell’s own family openly admitted: “[We] do recognise that setting” and subsequently though another photo that did the rounds – that of Ghislaine Maxwell at an In-N-Out burger joint in August 2019 – was exposed as doctored and thus showed the pension pot plunderer’s deviant daughter to be prone to partaking in fakery, the 2001 image that has been shared the world over millions of times has never been discredited.

Now, in spite of the washed-up wastrel wack job Lady Victoria Hervey – a money motivated meddler with utterly no qualification to comment on the authenticity of the price of fish let alone whether an image is genuine or not – chucking in her cloven hooves and attempting to muddy the waters by claiming the photograph a fake whilst lacking an ounce even of relevant proof, Michael Thomas, a New Zealand photographer who photographed the original photograph in 2011, has shared a far more sensible analysis.

Speaking to the New Zealand Herald this week, Thomas remarked:

“As I have said before, it was just an ordinary photo you would have got from a chemist in the days of negatives. Surely, if it was fake, every media outlet in the world would be getting sued for using it. The fact that isn’t happening, to me says everything.”

Of the image, previously in 2019, Thomas commented: “It wasn’t like she pulled the photo of Prince Andrew out, it was just in among the rest of them. They were just typical teenage snaps. There’s no way that photo is fake.”

THAT 2001 Photo Thus Far NOT PROVEN A FAKE – The 10^th March 2001 photograph of Prince Andrew, Virginia Roberts and Ghislaine Maxwell

The photograph, taken supposedly by Jeffrey Epstein on the first floor landing at 44 Kinnerton Street, Belgravia, London, SW1X 8ES, United Kingdom, has been shared by the world’s media in hundreds of thousands of articles and analysed countless times by countless experts.

In November 2019, the Daily Mail’s Inderdeep Bains called it: “The photograph that WON’T go away” and it, as of date, has NEVER been discredited. Amongst evidence suggesting it to be perfectly real is that:
- The setting of the photograph has been confirmed as genuine by the Maxwell family. Of it, in March 2021, Ian Maxwell told Radio 4’s Today programme: “I do recognise that setting.”
- The window in the picture has the same features as the front first floor windows of 44 Kinnerton Street.
- The width of the first floor landing is accurate to the measurements shown in the floor plan of the sales brochure prepared on the 14^th October 2021 by estate agents Wellbelove Quested.
- Though he claimed to be “at a loss to explain this particular photograph” during the 2019 BBC interview, the Duke of York has admitted to having visited 44 Kinnerton Street. He stated: “I don’t think I think ever went upstairs… The dining room and everything was on the ground floor.” Contradicting the royal, sources have claimed that the room behind him, Roberts and Maxwell in the photograph was used as a sitting room.
- The heights of all three individuals in the picture look to be accurate proportionately.
- Prince Andrew’s “chubby fingers” are clear to see. The Queen’s second son’s fingers are clearly “chubby fingers” and these very same “chubby fingers” have been seen hundreds of thousands of times in hundreds of thousands of other photographs.
- Prince Andrew has claimed he only ever goes out in London in a suit and tie. Images of him in open necked shirts in the capital – including one of him leaving the nightclub Chinawhite – prove to the contrary.
- Prince Andrew has claimed he does not “do” hugs and and embraces in photographs. Images of him taken in St Tropez embracing the US socialite Chris Von Aspen in July 2007 suggest the alleged non-sweater is wrong also on that score.
- The outfit worn by Virginia Roberts – a woman who has already received financial settlements from Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell – has been seen on her in photographs of her at Naomi Campbell’s 2001 birthday party in France. In spite of some suggestions that a lady only wears an outfit once, we counter that a lady in Miss Roberts’ unfortunate situation would be forced to wear what she was told appealed to those in control of her wished her to wear.
- Matthew Steeples of The Steeple Times and Shaun Attwood of Shaun Attwood’s True Crime Channel have both seen inside 44 Kinnerton Street and the stair rail shown in the photo remains in place and is thus genuine to the setting. Attwood subsequently released film footage of this on his YouTube channel and The Steeple Times shared its most recent image of the open front door with the stair rail beyond in July 2021.
- Many experts have repeatedly stated photo manipulation was in its infancy at the time that this image first surfaced.
- The FBI have never questioned the authenticity of the image.
In his 2019 BBC interview with Emily Maitlis, the Duke of York claimed he only wears a suit and tie when out and in London and does not “do” public hugs. These images prove to the contrary. Pictured – Prince Andrew leaving Chinawhite in London without a jacket and tie (top left); the randy royal in an embrace with a US socialite named Chris Von Aspen in St Tropez in July 2007.

In July 2021, ‘The Steeple Times’ shared an image of an open door at 44 Kinnerton Street when the house was undergoing external repainting. The bannister pictured clearly is exactly the same one featured in the March 2001 image of Prince Andrew, Virginia Roberts and Ghislaine Maxwell.

In 2019, Shaun Attwood of ‘Shaun Attwood’s True Crime Channel’ interviewed a lady who answered the door at 44 Kinnerton Street. In the footage he subsequently uploaded to YouTube, the bannister is again seen still in-situ.

The floor plan of 44 Kinnerton Street accurately reflects the shape of the space that Prince Andrew, Virginia Roberts and Ghislaine Maxwell were photographed in on 10th March 2001.

In a world exclusive last month, ‘The Steeple Times’ was the first publication to share a current photograph of the unrenovated bathroom at 44 Kinnerton Street where Prince Andrew and Virginia Roberts (now Virginia Giuffre) allegedly bonked in the tub. The image we shared provided proof that the tub was of a standard size and not “too small for any kind of activity whatsoever,” as Ghislaine Maxwell had stated during a 2015 defamation civil case brought after Maxwell called Giuffre a liar. The case was settled in 2017 in favour of Virginia Giuffre and at that time Ghislaine Maxwell was forced to pay damages.

The TRUE FAKE PHOTO – The August 2019 photograph of Ghislaine Maxwell at an In-N-Out Burger restaurant

It must be remembered that the now convicted mucky madam sex offender Ghislaine Maxwell was likely involved in leaking that infamous “too perfect” photoshopped image of herself at an In-N-Out Burger restaurant in Los Angeles in August 2019. Aside from this wicked woman – whom bangs on about being vegan constantly now – “planting herself for a double-double” burger, that image was subsequently debunked by The Cut. For them, Bridget Read stated:

“The intrepid Daily Mail checked out the location of the burger joint in Hollywood where Maxwell was allegedly spotted by a regular last week and found some odd discrepancies. Notably, a bus stop in the background of the shot shows an advertisement for the movie Good Boys – which the company that operates the ad space said has never been there. The bus stop currently displays an ad for a local hospital, which it says has been there since July 28. Maxwell was supposedly photographed at the In-N-Out on August 12.”

“Questions about Maxwell’s lunch outing have fed into the already robust set of conspiracy theories around Epstein, his high-profile acquaintances, and his death. Why was a second smartphone on the In-N-Out table? Why did Maxwell never stick a straw in either her soda or her shake? Why did the diner who supposedly photographed her have such a nice camera, with a lens that took a very clear photo? It doesn’t help that the In-N-Out employees at that location have been forbidden, supposedly by their employer, to talk about Maxwell’s visit.”

“If Saffian did indeed leak the photo of Maxwell, it was likely to try and throw the FBI off her scent… If the In-N-Out photo is indeed doctored, Maxwell could be anywhere and could show up anywhere she pleases. What’s next? Some predictions: eating a hot dog on the steps of the Met, posing with a cactus at Joshua Tree, riding a unicycle at Burning Man, or painting her nails on the C train.”
February 15, 2022