A year on from her conviction, the rabbit hole that is the story of Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein and their victims widens with new lawsuits on the horizon and new troubles for Prince Andrew also
As someone named Niki Watkins once crooned: “If you think it’s all over, then the joke is on you” and a year on from her conviction, the saga of Ghislaine Maxwell and her wicked associates continues to deliver up new twists and turns that prove that this is a saga that is far from over.
In a 30-minute podcast, released on New Year’s Eve by Law & Crime, attorneys Sigrid McCawley and Kenya Davis reflected on “recent developments” and claimed that “a new Empire State law could change the course of the investigation in 2023.”
Of this, Law & Crime’s Adam Klasfeld reported:
“Known as the Adult Survivors Act, the statute temporarily suspends the statute of limitations on historic sexual abuse claims. The statute is similar to and broadens the reach of another New York law called the Child Victims Act, which focused on the sexual abuse of minors specifically.”
Addressing the matter that sends the Twitterati into a tizzy on a daily basis as to no other accused co-conspirator of Maxwell having been charged, McCawley – who has represented a number of Epstein’s victims including Annie Farmer – declared: “I think the lesson and legacy of the Ghislaine Maxwell case is that nobody is above the law in the United States.”
Going further, Davis added: “I think you will see a ramp-up pretty, pretty quickly, especially after the start of the year” with “more docket activity soon.”
Whilst Donald Trump “wished her well, whatever that may mean” in times past of his old mucker Maxwell, he may well now be hoping she does something completely different. The 45th POTUS and Bill Clinton and Prince Andrew and others will most definitely prefer ‘The Bouncing Czech’s’ deviant daughter continues down the path of solemn silence.
Elsewhere on 30th December, the New York Post reported that Virginia Roberts Giuffre has now claimed that a defamation suit filed against her by Rina Oh, a lover of the dead paedophile Epstein during the early 2000s, is “a sham.” Ms Oh, whom admitted she had “brought at least three women to Epstein” in 2020, had filed a £8.4 million ($10 million, €9.5 million or درهم36.7 million) suit last January after Giuffre publicly named her as “one of Epstein’s recruiters” on Twitter.
At the time, this now 39-year-old lady who also received a sum estimated as high as £10.1 million ($12 million, €11.3 million or درهم44.1 million) from Prince Andrew in spite of him claiming he’d never met her, claimed Oh’s interview had “retraumatised” her. Oh had revealed she had taken the “then-teenage Giuffre to buy a school girl outfit to please the rich financier – justifying the outing by saying ‘17 to me is not a child’” and also stands accused of “cutting and slashing her as part of the sadomasochist abuse for Epstein’s pleasure.”
Editor’s Note – Unlike as is the case in many publications, this article was NOT sponsored or supported by a third-party.
Rina Oh now lauds herself as “producing art therapy with children” and an “longtime advocate of healthy eating for children” but also has been accused of doing far worse things to youngsters by Virginia Roberts Giuffre. Ms Oh is quite proud of her work with children, chefs and restaurateurs like Jacques Pépin (pictured far right) and Dave Arnold and even has a blog named ‘Dining With Out-Laws.’ She is far quieter about her time as the supposed girlfriend of Jeffrey Epstein.Rina Oh – according to the podcast ‘The Recruiters: Broken: Seeking Justice’ – has suggested the 10th March 2001 photograph of Ghislaine Maxwell, Prince Andrew and Virginia Roberts at 44 Kinnerton Street, Belgravia, London to be a “composite” and not genuine. Ms Oh has produced paintings herself of Jeffrey Epstein as Bacchus, Ghislaine Maxwell “nude in The Garden of Sin (like Eve)” and also sketched images of the pension pot plunderer Robert Maxwell also; her husband, Vincent Amen, was a “a former Michael Jackson employee who was named as one of five alleged unindicted co-conspirators in the late star’s unsuccessful 2005 molestation trial. Mr Amen denied the allegations.” Michael Thomas, a New Zealand photographer, who photographed the original 10th March 2001 image in 2011 responded: “As I have said before, it was just an ordinary photo you would have got from a chemist in the days of negatives. Surely, if it was fake, every media outlet in the world would be getting sued for using it. The fact that isn’t happening, to me says everything… It wasn’t like [Roberts Giuffre] pulled the photo of Prince Andrew out, it was just in among the rest of them. They were just typical teenage snaps. There’s no way that photo is fake.”For Prince Andrew (pictured here with mutual Epstein and Maxwell chum Peter Mandelson), aside from being turfed out of Buckingham Palace by his elder brother as the year begins, life could take a turn for the worse on another front. The gagging order agreed to when the late Queen’s second son agreed to pay a sum estimated between £3 million and £10 million to Virginia Roberts Giuffre comes to an end in February. After that time, Ms Giuffre will be free to write about the matter and give interviews; her commentary could prove yet another bombshell given what she’s previously said of ‘Randy Andy’ and others.Lord Mandelson ‘living-it-up’ with Jeffrey Epstein in the presence of the latter’s butler, Valdson Viera Cotrin, at the £10 million Parisian paedo pad owned by the Ponzi scheming sex fiend circa 20th January 2007. That the Labour peer – whose name 10 numbers attributed features in the Epstein-Maxwell ‘black book’ – was willing to celebrate the financier’s birthday with him is shocking – especially given it was widely by then known that Epstein had been charged with sex crimes in August 2006. The key ‘classic question’ Lord Mandelson now needs to answer is a paraphrasing of that put to decidedly dippy Debbie McGee by the late Caroline Ahern (in her role as the bonkers but brilliant ‘Mrs Merton’) in 1997: “What, first, Peter, was it that attracted you to the multi-millionaire Jeffrey Epstein?”Meanwhile now, though Maxwell will go down in history alongside her wicked sex offenders including Harvey Weinstein and Jeffrey Epstein, outrage remains that not a single one of those she sex trafficked her victims to has been brought to justice.Shockingly, in spite of being due to appear in court in the UK this month on sexual assault charges, Kevin Spacey (pictured partying in Buckingham Palace with Ghislaine Maxwell), is to play President Franjo Tudjman in a 90-minute film titled ‘Once Upon A Time in Croatia.’ Director Jakov Sedlar justified giving Spacey the role and claimed “[he] is absolutely innocent” in comments to ‘The Times’ yesterday.Facing troubles on other fronts… Notorious for fakery as well as for being a convicted sex offender and noxious nonce, Ghislaine Maxwell (AKA ‘Mrs Scott Borgerson’ as well ‘Jen Marshall’ and ‘Janet Marshall’; now known just as prisoner 02879-509) faces troubles on the home front. Whilst it is known that Mr Borgerson ended his relationship with Maxwell prior to her December 2021 trial by telephone, it is not known if they have yet divorced. Miss Maxwell transferred some £15 million to her husband since circa 2015 or 2016 and currently the sum owed to lawyers is an estimated £3 million plus. The prospects for the mucky madam now being able to afford to appeal her sentence thus looks more and more unlikely.
As sex abuse victim Virginia Roberts Giuffre concludes matters with lawyer Alan Dershowitz with a very clear “dismissed with prejudice and without costs or award of fees to either party” agreement, Bill Clinton gets questioned about his involvement with croaked paedophile Jeffrey Epstein
Firstly, it must be highlighted that Ms Roberts Giuffre was not a participant in the 2021 case that led to the conviction of the sex trafficking nonce daughter of the ‘Bouncing Czech’ – she had settled with her in June 2017 “with Maxwell reportedly paying Giuffre ‘millions’” – and secondly that the matter of Giuffre v Dershowitz is unrelated to the settlement the 39-year-old Sacramento born campaigner reached with the man whom claimed never to have met her, Prince Andrew, in February 2022.
Secondly, though many are now yet again calling into question the reliability of Roberts Giuffre, she also received a settlement from Jeffrey Epstein in 2009. Previously abused by a “close family friend” aged just seven and also bythe international sex trafficker Ron Eppinger aged just fourteen, here is a lady who genuinely has been a victim of abuse for most of her life and here someone who now helps others through her Speak Out, Act, Reclaim (SOAR) non-profit.
Speaking of developments on the Megyn Kelly show on Sirius XM yesterday, Dershowitz stated that Roberts Giuffre’s claims were a “terrible mistake that cause me a lot of grief.” He added that he now wanted to “wish her well” and remarked: “As far as I’m concerned the matter is now resolved and we can all go on living our lives, me with a clean record.”
He subsequently shared his clip on Twitter and accompanied it with commentary that read: “Do you have comments on the alleged – allegation of your connection with Jeffrey Epstein?” In the video footage, very clearly the 42nd POTUS bizarrely burst out laughing and answered: “I think the evidence is clear.”
Again raising questions as to how connected President Clinton was with both Epstein and Maxwell – who even attended his daughter Chelsea’s wedding in Rhinebeck, New York in July 2010 – this new evidence does not prove that this politician was involved in their evil activities, but it does show that he thinks the whole thing a bit of a hoot.
Follow SOAR | Speak Out, Act, Reclaim on Twitter at @speakoutactrclm.
Juan Mendoza captioned his tweet: “I confronted @BillClinton at the rally he held with @RepCuellar in Laredo about his alleged connections to child sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein. ‘I think the answer is clear’” and later corrected it with a second tweet reading: “Correction: ‘I think the evidence is clear.’”The ending of the Giuffre v Dershowitz case does not change the fact that the plaintiff was abused by numerous others and that she and numerous others were abused by Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and their numerous cohorts. It is time that these famous faces were named and shamed and brought to justice.The non-profit run by Virginia Giuffre, Speak Out, Act, Reclaim (SOAR), is indicative of her dedication to now supporting helping other victims of sex trafficking get help and “reclaim their stories and stand up for themselves.”Jeffrey Epstein with the 42nd President of the United States of America on one of the many occasions they spent days and days together. If you’d spent as much time as the Arkansas born politician did with the Ponzi schemer turned paedophile, you’d surely know something about what he was upto with the young women who accompanied him (even if you did not participate in it). You’d surely also have realised how very wrong this was and you’d have surely also have ended all contact with said monster.The former President living it up with two of his chums whilst in residence in the White House – both of them subsequently convicted sex offenders and both of them people he chose to spend time with on multiple occasions without questioning what they were upto or having his security detail check them out either.Even after her lover Jeffrey Epstein was convicted of sex offences in 2008, the Clinton family continued to welcome Ghislaine Maxwell in spite of the fact that she herself was linked to these crimes. The evil pension pot plunderer’s daughter even attended the 42nd POTUS’s daughter’s wedding in Rhinebeck, New York in July 2010 and sat front row. They do say: “If you lay down with dogs, you wake up with fleas” and in this case that adage most definitely applies.
As “rumours” circulate that ‘Randy Andy’ and ‘Feckless Fergie’ might remarry again do the rounds, we again ask: “Did they ever repay loans taken from the paedophile Jeffrey Epstein?”
Yesterday, repeating a story that occasionally does the rounds, Entertainment Daily’s Julia Hunt asked: “Are Prince Andrew and Fergie to remarry in the wake of [his] sex scandal?”
Claiming the couple “have been plagued by rumours they could remarry recently,” former Bang Showbiz and Press Association freelance writer Hunt quoted a September 2021 feature by Vanity Fair’s royal ‘expert’ Katie Nicholl as her primary evidence. In it, Nicholl – best known for crashing Kate Moss’s 30th birthday party at Claridge’s and discovering guests on the hokey-cokey – shared:
“Sarah and Andrew have been closer than ever in the past year. They still love and care for each other a great deal and have been living together during the pandemic.”
“It has rekindled something and I can see a second wedding happening if it [the Virginia Roberts Giuffre lawsuit] all goes Andrew’s way.”
Whilst Hunt’s update is clearly nothing but idle gossip produced without the citing of any new sources, last week the MailOnline’s Jack Wright revealed that the non-sweaty, Pizza Express loving mate of the alleged fraudster Bernie Ecclestone that is the Duke of York “barely leaves home.” He has been left wondering how his reputation has been left in tatters by his friendship with paedophile Jeffrey Epstein” and is said to be enduring a “period of intense self-reflection.”
Going further of a “virtual recluse” who has been left wondering “how everything went so wrong,” Wright turned to a previous article from The Telegraph and quoted yet another unnamed source, a “friend,” who stated:
“He has a much better understanding of the challenges he faces than at any other point in his life. He has a better sense of perspective – partly because he’s had these three years to reflect – to do the work, and to focus on his immediate family. The Duke of York of today is much more thoughtful and more mindful than he has ever been.”
“He acknowledges privately that Newsnight was by no means his finest hour.”
“The feeling that he has been treated abysmally is held by his nearest and dearest, but the duke’s attitude is more along the lines of: It is what it is.”
Clearly, though these ‘sources’ could be as made up as the spoof ‘Sir Michael Take CBE’ Twitter account that so successfully conned the MailOnline’s non-fact checking Elizabeth Haigh this morning (see below), things that seem unlikely do often occur in the royal family.
The friendship between Prince Andrew and Jeffrey Epstein dated back to the 1990s. In that time, both him and his ex-wife enjoyed hospitality and financial benefits from the since croaked paedophile without consideration of where the Ponzi scheming crook was actually getting his wonga from.The Duke of York and Sarah, Duchess of York did not think to question where the money they happily grabbed came from and they did not question what the mucky madam Ghislaine Maxwell was doing with the young girls she so eagerly sex trafficked for Epstein either. How terribly convenient.On Thursday 20th August 1992, the ‘Daily Mirror’ shared what they called “the pictures they didn’t want you to see.” In them, a topless Duchess of York was shown having her toes sucked in the South of France by a Texan millionaire named John Bryan. Of the incident, the ‘Mirror’ later reported: “Royal writer Richard Kay claimed in the ‘Daily Mail’ that he received a message via pager from Princess Diana the night before the photos hit the newspaper stands. Diana’s message was simple: ‘The redhead’s in trouble.’” If she were now to remarry the Duke of York, would it be accepted or would there be even more trouble?This morning on Twitter, editor of ‘The Steeple Times’ Matthew Steeples shared a tweet about another example of ‘fake news’ shared by the ‘MailOnline’s’ Elizabeth Haigh. Accompanying a quoted tweet, Steeples observed: “The @MailOnline has been caught out by a spoof Twitter account. Sir Michael TAKE certainly TOOK some pillock on the paper. Retraction? Apology? I doubt it. #fakenews #dailymail #mailonline #youvebeenhad.” It is likely that ‘Entertainment Daily’s’ Julia Hunt has been similarly caught out with her story about the Duke of York and Sarah, Duchess of York considering remarriage, but who knows with ‘Needy’ and ‘Greedy’ … Stranger things could and have already happened.
Of sex, her and goats: “One of the worst headlines said 82% [of the population] would rather sleep with a goat than Fergie. It’s never left me.”
Of the royal family: “They tried to put the little redhead in a cage.”
Of her life: “I have been in the gutter.”
Of food, family and dining: “As long as it is hot, wet and goes down the right way, it’s fine with me.”
“With every smell, I smell food. With every sight, I see food. I can almost hear food. I want to spade the whole lot through my mouth at Mach 2. Basta!”
“We all sit round the table and eat together. Andrew and I believe in total parent unity. We’re best friends.”
Of wanting to be a television star: “I would quite like to go on Dancing With The Stars. I would like somebody to teach me to tango. I do know the show and my children would be so proud of me.”
Of when she decided she wanted to bag a royal: “I met [Prince Andrew] when I was 12, and I said: ‘I’m going to marry him.’”
Of marriage, divorce and work: “I left my marriage knowing I’d have to work. I have.”
“I didn’t want a divorce, but had to because of circumstance.”
“I wish we’d never got divorced. He and I both wish we’d never divorced, but we did. I wish I could go back and be the bride again, but I can’t.”
Of her many, many mistakes: “I felt that I ostracised myself by my behaviour, by the past, by living with all the regrets of my mistakes, that I sort of wore a hair shirt and beat myself up most of the day thinking and regretting why did I make such a mistake. Why have I made so many mistakes?”
“You look at the devil in the face, which you do. Then you forgive, and you say: ‘OK, I’ve made almost a mistake that will never be forgotten,’ and forgive.”
“I was so out of control with desperation… I was looking for quick fixes in the places I wouldn’t normally look… I’ve been a huge, over-trusting, idiotic, stupid woman that went to look for the perfect situation, and that’s all I can say really.”
Prince Andrew’s second cousin calls out Daphne Barak’s ‘interviews’ with mucky madam Ghislaine Maxwell as “self-serving” and her way of “taking everyone down with her”
Hillary Clinton mouthpiece Daphne Barak’s ‘interviews’ with convicted sex trafficking nonce Ghislaine Maxwell have gone down like a lead balloon with Christina Oxenberg, a second cousin of Prince Andrew.
Speaking to The U.S. Sun about what she views as a pair of “self-serving” interviews by Jeffrey Epstein’s co-collaborator in multiple abuse of multiple victims, Oxenberg remarked:
“They are pretending that they’re on [Prince Andrew’s] side and they’re helping him and they’re working with him. They’re not at all, this is entirely self-serving.”
“He doesn’t need any more help from Ghislaine. Here they are saying: ‘We’re gonna prove that the photograph is not real.’ It doesn’t really matter anymore. He’s already paid the money.”
“This is her way of pretending she’s helping him, and he’s buying it.”
“She says there are 50 points wrong with the photograph, that’s how liars speak.”
“A truthful person would say: ‘The three of us were never in that house. So, it’s impossible.’ And she never goes anywhere near that. She’s like: ‘No, look at the shadow on his hand.’”
“She really destroyed the last year of the Queen’s life, making Her Majesty worry about Andrew and the shenanigans and that’s all on Maxwell, she caused all of that distress.”
“And her only motivation is to save herself, meanwhile taking everyone down with her on the way.”
“I wish he would come out and say: ‘I am so sorry [Maxwell] tricked me and I fell for it. I brought disgrace, I brought misery.’”
“But now that I see clearly all I can do is be grateful that I know the truth and cut all ties with Ghislaine and admit my shame and move forward in a positive way.”
“The best thing he could do is have the courage to come out and admit he was used by her. And then he would be free of her. Let her rot in jail and forget about her. And he could start his road to redemption.”
Turning to Maxwell’s comments about her former “friends” President Bill Clinton and President Donald Trump, Oxenberg surmised that she was “’signalling’ to the pair that she still holds the power.” She added:
“She is reminding them who is boss. She’s so sinster and creepy, she’s evil and I won’t drop that stance. She has no remorse.”
“This line that she’s pushing about how any woman could have fallen in love [with a bad guy]. Very few women would agree to commit felonies, multiple felonies for years. There are some, but there are very few. And most are in jail.”
“That is so insulting to say that: ‘Oh, anyone who’s been in a bad relationship.’ First of all, it wasn’t a relationship, it was a job. And she never said she loved him, she tried to get him to marry her.”
Of how the former Oceana ‘charity’ chief will cope in the clink, Oxenberg offered:
“I’m well aware that Ghislaine is a good fit. She’s with her own kind, those with a criminal mind. She’s tough, she’s arrogant and they’ll love her accent, they’ll find it funny. And she’s just going to blame everything on Epstein.”
Previously, in January 2020, Christina Oxenberg told Page Six that she had attended a “ladies’ tea party” in Maxwell’s then home on 79th Street in New York in 1991 where the mucky madam was dressed in just her knickers and bra.
Of the bizarre encounter – prior to which the ‘Bouncing Czech’s’ deviant daughter had “wailed… ‘I’m poor!’” on the telephone whilst inviting her guest – Oxenberg recalled:
“Ghislaine presided in a white lacy bra and underwear set and lots of jewelry; she jangled as she moved. She explained the lack of clothing was because she was hot and it was summertime. She fanned herself with a copy of Vogue … I can’t remember their names but there were three other females at this tea party. We remained fully clothed.”
Also present was “a baby Yorkshire terrier” named Max, “which Maxwell had been gifted.” Of this Oxenberg observed: “More than once, she threw the quivering little bundle violently across the room. She thought this was hilariously funny.”
Taking everyone down Maxwell style – The deranged deviant, mucky madam with the terrier she is said to have abused just like she abused her victims. Here is a wicked woman allegedly abused by her wicked father who did not know right from wrong and who thus viewed abusing both humans and animals as perfectly normal.Taking everyone down Maxwell style – The mucky madam with Christina Oxenberg and His Royal Highness Prince Dimitri of Yugoslavia in 2013.Taking everyone down Maxwell style – The mucky madam with her siblings in London in the summer of 2019.
Key quotes from Daphne Barak’s ‘interviews’ that are more PR peddling spinning than journalistic digging and key questions that arise as a result of this disgraceful PR peddling even being allowed
The recent toady interviews in The Sun on Sunday and The Mail on Sunday by ‘journalist’ Daphne Barak, who seems to like associating with the mates of the mucky madam Maxwell as much as she did herself, have been rightly called out as “poor” and “nothing but PR” by a woman with a goal of “taking everyone down” with her.
Key questions that arise as a result are:
Why did the American authorities allow a prisoner to give such interviews so soon after her conviction?
Did the authorities not consider the impact such interviews would have on the victims of this convicted sex trafficking nonce and grubby groping abuser?
What is the agenda of Daphne Barak and what involvement did Kevin Maxwell and his siblings have in setting up these interviews?
Did PR peddlers for the mucky madam – such as Brian Basham, Jay Beecher and Ross Gow – have any involvement in the bringing about of these interviews?
Why did this so-called ‘journalist’ not ask anything about what this mucky madam feels about the impact of her actions on her many victims?
Why did this so-called ‘journalist’ not ask anything about this mucky madam’s secret marriage to Scott Borgerson in 2015?
Why did this so-called ‘journalist’ not ask why Ghislaine Maxwell – someone she’s associated with for at least 30 years – hasn’t paid off her debts to her lawyers?
Some quotes from Barak’s clearly biased in favour of assisting Jeffrey Epstein’s one-time-lover and co-abuser’s interviews follow:
Of Prince Andrew:
“I accept that this friendship could not survive my conviction. He is paying such a price for the association. I consider him a dear friend. I care about him.”
Of President Bill Clinton:
“It was a special friendship, which continued over the years. We had lots in common. I feel bad that he is another victim, only because of his association with Jeffrey. I understand he, like others, can no longer consider me as a friend.”
Of Jeffrey Epstein:
“I said in my court statement that meeting Epstein was the greatest mistake of my life. And obviously, if I could go back today, I would avoid meeting him, and I would make different choices.”
Of President Donald Trump:
“We knew each other and mingled in the same circles, in New York, Palm Beach. I was very grateful when he wished me well after (the arrest). He got bad media for it, but he dared, while others didn’t.
“I was honoured he remembered me. Well, he is known to say what he thinks. It gave me a big boost.”
Of other friends and former friends:
“There are people who have disappointed me and there are people I’m surprised have not, you know, been a little more proactive. I completely understand people have livelihoods to protect… children to protect.”
“But having said that, there are people who have stood by me privately. Quite a few, actually, and I’m extremely appreciative of their private support.”
“I have friends who I have literally known my entire life since I was at kindergarten. It’s good to know there are people out there who know who I am, really.”
Of that now infamous photo with Prince Andrew and the then Virginia Roberts at 44 Kinnerton Street, Belgavia in March 2001:
“This photo is not real… There was never an original one produced.”
Names in the firing line most obvious from Ghislaine’s filthy ‘Little Black Book’ as she seeks to minimise her sentence
Ghislaine Maxwell has until June 2023 to cooperate and thus “name names” if she wishes to see her sentence reduced.
Those Scott Borgerson’s estranged wife has been known to associate with – none of whom The Steeple Times is suggesting at this time as having been involved in any of her crimes, but whom she might seek revenge against for not offering her what she might consider enough public or even private support – include:
Alexander Acosta
Woody Allen
Ehud Barak
Tom Barrack
Scott Borgerson
Jean-Luc Brunel (deceased)
Naomi Campbell
President Bill Clinton and his wife Hillary
Alan Dershowitz
Glenn Dubin and his wife Eva
Bernie Ecclestone
Bill Gates
Geordie Greig
Countess of Iveagh (AKA Clare Guinness, Clare Hazell)
Lord Mandelson
Marvin Minsky
George J. Mitchell
Rupert Murdoch
Elon Musk
Peter Nygård
Bill Richardson III
Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman
Kevin Spacey
Jes Staley
Ken Starr
President Donald Trump and his potentially trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein wife Melania
Ivana Trump (deceased)
Chris Tucker
Harvey Weinstein
Leslie Wexner
Prince Andrew, Duke of York and his live-in ex-wife Sarah, Duchess of York
As prized pillock Prince Andrew reacts to mucky madam Ghislaine Maxwell’s interviews, we suggest that he’s a case of “with friends like these, who needs enemies”
Non-sweating, Pizza Express loving prized pillock Prince Andrew isn’t very good at choosing mates. He’s got “I’d take a bullet for Putin” coffin dodger Bernie Ecclestone – a deranged dwarf-like dweeb currently on trial for fraud – and aside from a fair few despots, he happily used to hang around with the croaked paedophile Jeffrey Epstein – even after his 2008 conviction.
Whilst Maxwell claimed to “care for… dear friend [the Duke of York],” the chirpy, chatty “friend” of the late Queen’s second son responded describing the criminal’s remarks as “[having] not been very helpful.” Clearly, said individual is someone who likes understatements when it comes to observing public relations disaster areas.
“With friends like these, who needs enemies” comes to mind in the wake of Maxwell’s interviews with Barak for The Sun on Sunday and The Mail on Sunday. Here is a woman who has used her latest PR peddler to send out a message and it is a message that is clear.
The deviant daughter of a man most definitely a spy wants to tell the world something and that something is this: Ponzi schemer Jeffrey Epstein’s former lover is alerting the royal and the likes of Bill Clinton and Donald Trump that she expects them to help her out of her hell hole. It is a hell hole where she actually deserves to rot for the rest of her genuinely rotten existence.
Pictured top – The Duke of York and his live-in ex-wife Sarah, Duchess of York snapped in a Range Rover yesterday looking, as the ‘MailOnline’ was quick to point out, “ashen faced” and “incredibly serious.”
With friends like these… The guffawing goon that is the Duke of York was happy to take the “benefits” of his friendship with someone who bunged him cash and girls, Jeffrey Epstein, when it suited him. He was happy to take the “benefits” of his friendship with Ghislaine Maxwell, someone he allegedly even had a relationship with, when it suited him. He must now face the music and possibly also prepare to be dragged before the authorities if he ever dares to darken the doors of the United States of America ever again. Shame on him.With friends like these… In February 2020, ‘The Steeple Times’ reported on croaked paedophile Jeffrey Epstein’s chum (and his wife Sarah, Duchess of York’s financial sponsor) Prince Andrew having Bernie Ecclestone over to Royal Lodge, Windsor to celebrate his birthday. Whether this man “with qualities that would make Leona Helmsley look generous” brought Sloppy Giuseppes from Pizza Express (Woking branch) for the bash remains still unknown.With friends like these… Another chum of ‘Air Miles Andy’ is the billionaire despot leader of Azerbaijan President Ilham Aliyev. This authoritarian dictator is known for a regime that presides over elections that are not free and fair, where political power is concentrated in the hands of his family, where corruption is rampant and human rights violations are beyond severe. The Aliyev’s have over £400 million of property in the United Kingdom alone and the Duke of York has most definitely been beyond helpful to them.With friends like these… Sarah, Duchess of York, equally, has a lot to fear from Ghislaine Maxwell. She happily took wonga from Ponzi schemer Jeffrey Epstein in loans and gifts and has never declared whether or not she ever repaid such prior to the paedophile’s death in 2019. Shame on her.
The Maxwell mess continues… Ghislaine Maxwell trial commentator for CNN Page Peter drowns in Georgia as Jeffrey Epstein whistleblower Maria Farmer curiously claims she was planning to move in with his Ponzi scheming “mentor” Steven Hoffenberg before his death; separately Maxwell gets sued by another of her former lawyers.
On Sunday, 55-year-old constitutional law attorney Page Peter – whose commentary for CNN during Ghislaine Maxwell’s trial was noted – became the latest with a link to the mucky madam and her case to meet an unfortunate end when he tragically drowned off the coast of Georgia.
Whilst Mr Peter was pronounced dead at the scene, his son, who had been swimming alongside him, fortunately was rescued and meanwhile in other news on Tuesday, The Sun’s Chris White “exclusively” revealed that Jeffrey Epstein’s “mentor” Steven Hoffenberg was “due to move in with the late paedophile’s first whistleblower… [and] victim” Maria Farmer “just before he died.”
Grifting conman Hoffenberg, who left behind 200,000 victims of his Ponzi scheme when his decomposing body was found in August, was ludicrously lauded by Farmer as being “like an angel to all the survivors.” Going further of the born-again Christian criminal, the 52-year-old ex-receptionist added:
“I was his family. He was my family. I’ve never had a real father, Hoffenberg was like a father to me. He was loving and kind, and he was full of remorse about trusting Epstein.”
“He spent all of his days trying to make up for what he overlooked about Epstein.”
“He lived off social security, eating barely anything. He had £1,130 ($1,300, €1,301 or درهم4,774) a month to live on including rent. That’s why I wanted him to come here because he wouldn’t have to pay rent, so he would have a bit more money.”
“He would not let me give him anything, but I finally got him to agree because I had a place for him to live, we decorated the room for him.”
“We were writing a children’s book together. But then he got really, really sick – and that was a month before he died. He died at home alone.”
“I’m glad that he’s no longer suffering. But I can tell you this, people really missed out on a great man because I got to know him.”
“He was there for us all the time. He helped if I had any legal questions, and I didn’t want to bother my lawyers, I could call him and he had the answers, as he’d retrained as a lawyer in prison.”
“He was a sounding board for us. Hoffenberg felt culpable because he didn’t pick up on Epstein, just like I didn’t at first. You feel completely guilty.”
“He always said: ‘I just need to make up for everything that’s ever happened.’”
“He was the biggest supporter to all the survivors. He prayed for each of them every day.”
In another development, on Tuesday also, the Daily Beast’s Kate Briquelet shared that Kyle R. Waldner, a counsel in the U.S. Virgin Islands office of Quintairos, Prieto, Wood & Boyer, P.A. have followed Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C. – who are suing the ‘Bouncing Czech’s’ deviant daughter, her estranged husband Scott Borgerson and her brother Kevin Maxwell for £763,285 ($878,302, €879,247 or درهم3.2 million) in unpaid legal fees – and have announced they “would stop representing her unless payment was received.”
In a filing in late August, Kyle Waldner of the firm “indicated that he [had] informed Kevin Maxwell, and [Ghislaine] Maxwell herself in a letter to her in prison at FCI Tallahassee.”
Attorney and CNN commentator on the mucky madam Maxwell’s messy trial Page Peter tragically drowned last weekend.The decomposing body of Steven Hoffenberg, the evil Ponzi schemer and “mentor” of Jeffrey Epstein, was found in a very messy house he shared in Derby, Connecticut on 23rd August.Maria Farmer’s claim that she was planning on moving Steven Hoffenberg, the criminal associate and “mentor” of the man she went to the FBI to claim she abused by, Jeffrey Epstein, into her home prior to his death in August is beyond curious.Scott Borgerson (pictured left with his new lover Kris McGlinn and right with his now estranged convicted criminal wife) is being chased for payment by Ghislaine Maxwell’s legal team. The likely costs involved are well above £1 million and the mess that the mucky madam got herself and her family into will ultimately have cost into the tens of millions.63-year old Kevin Maxwell (pictured with his sibling Isabel) is also being pursued for his convicted criminal sister’s legal costs.
The ‘Curious’ Deaths Connected To Jeffrey Epstein And Ghislaine Maxwell That Continue To Stack Up…
People who’ve moved in the orbit of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell do have a habit of coming to ‘sticky ends’ – amongst them:
Pension pot plundering tea leaf Robert Maxwell (death by ‘falling off the back of a boat’ in the Canary Islands, Spain on 5th November 1991).
Palm Beach based Ponzi schemer and paedophile Jeffrey Epstein (death by ‘suicide’ in prison in New York, USA on 10th August 2019).
Palm Beach based Ponzi scheming crook Bernard L. Madoff (death as a result of chronic kidney disease on 14th April 2021 in Butner, North Carolina).
Palm Beach based Marvin Weiner and his wife Sondra, the sister of Ponzi schemer Bernie Madoff (death by murder-suicide in Boynton Beach, USA on 17th February 2022).
Molester model agent and alleged paedophile Jean-Luc Brunel (death by ‘suicide’ in prison in Paris, France on 19th February 2022).
Convicted Ponzi scheming Donald Trump associate and self-publicist Steven J. Hoffenberg (death by causes yet unknown on date yet unknown in Derby, Connecticut, USA, decomposing body found on 23rd August 2022).
Attorney and trial lawyer Page Pate (death by drowning on the coast of Georgia on 11th September 2022) – his commentary on Ghislaine Maxwell’s trial was noted.
As author Kirby Sommers suggests that the then Meghan Markle likely spent time with Prince Andrew and Jeffrey Epstein before she met Prince Harry, we again highlight the mucky, murkiness and mendacious manner of this alleged “yacht girl”
In January 2020, following a tip from a renowned journalist from a national newspaper, The Steeple Times asked: “Did the then Meghan Markle meet Prince Andrew before she met Prince Harry? Or did she meet the friend of the late paedophile Jeffrey Epstein first?”
Now, just as the fallout from Tom Bower’s Revenge book continues to excite Twitter and her pugnacious PR peddler Omid Scobie announces that he’s writing a sequel to Finding Freedom, this very question has again resurfaced.
Discussed in a 35:49-minute podcast shared on YouTube late last week, crusading author of Ghislaine Maxwell: An Unauthorized Biography Kirby Sommers examines the connections between the Duchess of Sussex, Prince Andrew, Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.
Effectively suggesting Markle’s mate, Markus Anderson of Soho House, to be a ‘connector’ going back as far as 2001, Sommers argues the mainstream media “may have a photo of her” on a yacht in Phuket, Thailand “cavorting” with Prince Andrew at the behest of the mucky madam Maxwell and the since croaked paedophile Epstein.
Going further, the author also provides evidence of Markle having been invited to the ‘Yacht Week 2016’ in Croatia by an individual named Adam Haun. Founded by William Wenkel in 2006 and described as “Sodom and Gommorah at sea” by GQ in 2015, it is unknown whether then actress attended the hedonistic “Tinder at sea” event that one participant, Sweet Home Alabama dating show ‘bachelor’ Tribble Reese lauded as “like the Bahamas on steroids!”
Concluding on Twitter, Sommers observed: “[The Duchess of Sussex] is controlled by the same forces that controlled Jeffrey Epstein.”
The Duke and Duchess of Sussex and the Duke of York andn their representatives, unsurprisingly, failed to respond to requests for comment.
A man believed to be Markus Anderson pictured on a yacht in Phuket, Thailand with Prince Andrew in 2001.
Tweets by crusading author of ‘Ghislaine Maxwell: An Unauthorized Biography’ Kirkby Sommers about the connection between the Duchess of Sussex, the Duke of York and the late Jeffrey Epstein:
Of her claiming having got married the day before she actually did, Mr Markle stated: “Lying about the archbishop? How can you say: ‘We’ve been married three days before we got married’? Her lies are so obvious, I don’t know why she says them.”
Her very own half-sister, Samantha, who is currently bringing a defamation case against her, has called her out as a liar on multiple occasions also. It has been proven that the duchess’s claim that she hasn’t seen her sibling in over 20 years was proven untrue when a photo of the pair 13 years ago emerged.
Her very own half-brother, Thomas Jr., said of her: “I told Prince Harry, I think she’s going to ruin your life. She’s very shallow… She’s a phony, a bully, a jaded, shallow, conceited woman.”
The former Meghan Markle has been called out on multiple occasions for spinning stories against other members of the royal family, most especially the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge.
Staff who’ve worked for her have complained that she is a bully and investigations into this remain ongoing.
The Duchess of Sussex is a known manipulator of the press and paparazzis and it has been claimed that she’ll “twist the truth” to get any headline she wants.
Questions remain as to how many times she’s actually been married in total. Some say twice, some say thrice.
As mucky madam Ghislaine Maxwell is moved to a low security prison in Florida where prisoners will supposedly likely “hate” her, PR peddler Jay Beecher’s ‘The Maxwell Files’ website bizarrely starts promoting organic vegetables in Sussex and lists stories about this anything but wholesome criminal as “recipes”
Whilst such individuals miss the very clear points of differences about the domain of each case and how media are allowed to cover or not cover such, they also ignore the simple matter that there were people present and that they did see a woman who was simply not suffering from malnutrition as her family had claimed. Cashmere clad Ghislaine Maxwell, our sources present tell us, was very much real, had a full head of hair and her weight had declined from 146 pounds on arrest by just 1.5 pounds to 144.5 pounds by the time of her trial.
Rightly called out for her decidely dodgy deviancy – which ranged from inventing pseudonyms to telling porky pies about her multi-million dollar fortune – ‘The Bouncing Czech’s’ favourite child was last weekend transferred to the Tallahassee Federal Correctional Institution in Florida. She will now serve a sentence there that, if she learns to behave herself a bit better than she has thus far, will see her released on 17th July 2037.
Going further, the paper’s Daniel Bates added of the thus far unapologetic supposed ex-lover of non-sweating Prince Andrew:
“[She] could become a target for others inmates unless she acts humbly and stops complaining about her life. But Maxwell has done the exact opposite so far and has griped relentlessly about her conditions.”
“[She] will still still have a tough time adjusting and will be in with murderers and women who have committed serious assaults. The facility is run down, humid and some women will ‘hate her’ because of her celebrity… There will be women who have been abused themselves and will not like her at all because of her crimes.”
Elsewhere yesterday, one of vegan Maxwell’s PR peddlers, Jay Beecher, took down the ‘Maxwell Files’ website where he has spread many falsehoods against the victims of this now convicted criminal sex trafficker. He replaced it with a “coming soon” missive, but by this morning an even stranger replacement had sprouted.
The ‘Maxwell Files,’ now, has become a website that promotes the sale of “locally farmed organic vegetables” from a “12-acre farm in Sussex.” It still includes articles featuring the sexual abuser’s sibling Ian Maxwell bleating on about her “innocence,” but weirdly describes such as “our favourite recipes.” One thing, however, is for sure – the only grub Ghislaine Maxwell will deservedly be getting for the next twenty years is nothing but gruel. Off to the compost heap with this rotten apple!
Pictured top (left to right) – Sordid “socialite” Ghislaine Maxwell living it up at Ascot racecourse in happier times in June 1991 prior to the death of her pension pot plundering papa; contributor to discredited ‘Politicalite’ publication – which disgracefully smeared the good name of respected journalist Peter Jukes – Jay Beecher and a selection of organic vegetables – as promoted by Beecher on his extremely toady arse-licking ‘Maxwell Files’ website.
On Monday 25th July 2022, the ‘Maxwell Files’ site run by PR peddler Jay Beecher disappeared and was replaced with a “coming soon” message.By Tuesday 26th July, the website had been updated and had become a place listing the sale of organic vegetables and delivering “locally farmed organic vegetable boxes from [a] 12-acre farm in Sussex.” Ghislaine Maxwell’s connections to this operation are unknown, but it seems unlikely to see her toiling the soil ‘Darling Buds of May’ style any day soon (or until her anticipated release date in 2037 even).The news section of the new ‘Maxwell Files’ website bizarrely suggested visitors “try with our vegetables” and “our favourite recipes.” These “recipes” included stories about the anything but wholesome mucky madam rather than actual stories about cooking with organic produce.Ironically, the website – which has been amongst the main places apologists for the ex-wife to be of Scott Borgerson have posted content in support of her – had a section called: “Why you’ll love us.” It suggested the offering to be “ethical” amongst other things – something the mucky madam has most definitely been proven to anything but be.Previously, in January this year, a lady named Nicole Cornes attempted to suggest Jay Beecher previously worked for ‘The Steeple Times.’ Thankfully, when she realised that we would NEVER associate with this rotten piece of toerag, she very sensibly apologised.Beecher likes to make himself out to be some kind of crusader who will never allow anyone to “silence [his] reporting.” He is instead simply laughable and a hollow individual who’ll jump any rotten bandwagon. How rotten the vegetables from his new operation in Sussex are remains to be seen.Elsewhere, earlier this month Jeffrey Epstein’s co-collaborator’s brother, Ian Maxwell, penned a feature for ‘The Spectator’ in which he claimed: “My sister Ghislaine was denied justice. The whole system was designed to convict, not to find the truth.” Going further, he tellingly showed his family’s arrogance in adding: “Ghislaine became a replacement for Epstein… The evidence is clear that Ghislaine believed herself to be free of guilt. Had she even suspected that she might be arrested she would have fled beyond the reach of the US legal system to France, of which she is a citizen.” Here, indeed, are a family who believe the law should not apply to them; this is a family who consider themselves above the law and, just like the late tax evader Leona Helmsley, above the “little people.”
As he faces a court showdown with Virginia Roberts Giuffre, Ghislaine Maxwell apologist Alan Dershowitz gets deservedly snubbed by his now former friend Larry David
In an interview by telephone with Isaac Chotiner – published in The New Yorker on Tuesday 19th July – the emeritus professor of law at Harvard declared he had been “cancelled” for “daring to defend” Donald Trump and stated of his encounter with David:
“What happened is – it’s interesting because I was having lunch with a very radical lawyer who loves me. I mean, he disagrees with me. We argue all the time, but he is not part of the Chilmark crowd. So I was having lunch with him and then a number of other people were there. Suddenly, Larry David walks in to buy some groceries. I say, ‘Hey. Hi, Larry,’ and he turns away, and he just walks away. I say, ‘Larry, can’t we at least talk?’ He said, ‘No. You’re disgusting.’”
“He said, ‘I saw you pat Mike Pompeo on the back.’ It’s true. I did. Here’s the story. It was the Abraham Accords, or the movement toward peace in Israel under the Trump Administration, which I played a central role in.”
He said, ‘I saw you pat Mike Pompeo on the back.’ It’s true. I did. Here’s the story. It was the Abraham Accords, or the movement toward peace in Israel under the Trump Administration, which I played a central role in.”
Asked if he’d watch Curb Your Enthusiasm again, the leading Ghislaine Maxwell apologist curtly responded:
“No. Because I know that the Larry David that’s in Curb Your Enthusiasm is not a fictional character. He’s the real Larry David… If you know that he’s the real Larry David, that curmudgeon, the nasty guy.”
Elsewhere last week, Virginia Roberts Giuffre – whom accuses Dershowitz of sexually abusing her on at least 6 occasions and claims him to be “engaging in revisionist history” – revealed that she is seeking a date of March 2023 for their defamation. The lawyer and retired Harvard professor has previously claimed to have never met the woman Prince Andrew paid £12 million to in spite of also claiming to have never her and has also called her a “certified, complete, total liar.”
Pictured top – Comedian and actor Larry David in a ‘Make America Great Again’ baseball cap (left) and lawyer Alan Dershowitz enjoying a giggle with the late croaked paedophile Jeffrey Epstein (right).
The BBC was rightly forced to apologise for giving the loudmouth lawyer airtime in December 2021 after Ghislaine Maxwell’s conviction in New York. On Twitter, their press team declared giving the lawyer the opportunity to speak “did not meet the BBC’s editorial standards.” They added that they subsequently realized that he “was not a suitable person to interview as an impartial analyst, and we did not make the relevant background clear to our audience.” They concluded: “We will look into how this happened” yet unsurprisingly no heads subsequently rolled.Dershowitz and Epstein pictured together at a Harvard event. The pair liked to portray themselves as sophisticated, but frankly both of them have ended up as being portrayed as grasping, grubby gropers. Of the latter, the former told the ‘Miami Herald’ in June: “Everybody missed it. My wife and I never saw young girls at that house. There was never a young girl in that house. There was never a picture of a young girl in that house. There were pictures of [former President Bill] Clinton, and other prominent people.” Of Virginia Roberts Giuffre, he added: “I want all the $20 million [in civil settlements] she’s gotten to be taken away from her and given to the real victims,” Dershowitz said. “Which I will do. I want her to go to prison for committing massive perjury. This case will never be over until Virginia Giuffre pays the price for her false accusations.”Dershowitz (left) drinking red wine with Epstein (centre) and former Treasury Secretary and later Harvard President Lawrence Summers (right) at a Harvard sponsored event on 9th September 2004 in Cambridge, Massachusetts.At the likely March 2023 trial, lawyers for Roberts Giuffre (pictured above) intend to call in-person witnesses (aside from herself) including David Boies, Sigrid McCawley, Brad Edwards, Paul Cassell, David Stone and Epstein’s first known British victim, Anouska de Georgiou.
Alan Dershowitz was played by Ron Silver in the 1990 American drama film ‘Reversal of Fortune’ with Jeremy Irons as Claus von Bülow and Glenn Close as Sunny von Bülow. The 111-minute film grossed £12.3 million at the box office and was lauded for its “exceptional performances” and “cunning script.”
As it is suggested ‘Sleepy Joe’ Biden might pardon Ghislaine Maxwell, Matthew Steeples suggests that notion to be highly doubtful
Prime Ministers, Presidents and dictators have long been known to kowtow to media moguls. Be it Adolf Hitler with the 1st Viscount Rothermere and both Margaret Thatcher and Tony Blair with Rupert Murdoch, the power of the titans that control the press is long known but this week’s suggestion that Joe Biden might pardon Ghislaine Maxwell seems a little beyond ludicrous.
Responding to the headline “MAXWELL SELLS OUT TRUMP! Epstein MADAM dealing for PARDON from BIDEN” – which was accompanied by subheadings including “wild and WICKED parties!” and “What she KNOWS about MELANIA!” – Sheridan called it out as a “will o’ the wisp yarn” that is “wildly speculative.”
Going further, he adds:
“According to this tabloid of record: ‘Imprisoned child sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell has told authorities she’s ready to squeal on party pal Donald Trump in a desperate bid to get out of jail before she dies.’”
“Presumably because getting out of jail after she dies isn’t optimal.”
“If Maxwell was going to plea bargain, it would have been before her conviction and sentencing to 20 years imprisonment, not afterwards when she is now relying on a rare presidential pardon or commuted sentence.”
“If Biden pardoned Maxwell just to nail Trump, he would be excoriated for making a purely political move that blatantly offers an incentive to Maxwell to potentially lie about the former president to win her freedom.”
“Apart from the fact that Maxwell is a convicted criminal whose word can hardly be trusted, how could she prove any allegation she levels against Trump?”
“The story isn’t even supported by evidence that Maxwell has requested such a deal. The best the Enquirer can come up with is a New York attorney who says: ‘After hearing her sentence, Ghislaine may have realised she has no other options but to sing.’”
Monstrous media mogul turned pension pot plunderer’s daughter Miss Maxwell (AKA Mrs Scott Borgerson, ‘Jennifer Ellmax,’ ‘Jen Marshall,’ ‘Janet Marshall’ and just plain old ‘G’) certainly, however, has been photographed with Donald Trump on multiple occasions and clearly got along with him well.
It must be remembered that Maxwell – whose odds of a pardoning from Trump were at 3/1 before he left office – was showed no mercy from her former friend, the 45th POTUS. He did, however, pardon another media mogul, his chum the convicted fraudster and former Daily Telegraph owner, Lord (Conrad) Black, and in doing so most definitely gave the now convicted mucky madam sex offender the finger.
Allegations also that Melania Trump was trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein continue to do the rounds also and rotting in her cell, Maxwell, may finally realise her ‘friends’ have turned her and it’s time for her to turn on them. Stranger things, perhaps, indeed, have happened… The ‘Grubby Ghislaine’ show, after all, is the unwanted gift that keeps on giving.
Pictured top – The latest edition of the ‘National Enquirer’ features a cover story that reads: “MAXWELL SELLS OUT TRUMP! Epstein MADAM dealing for PARDON from BIDEN” (left); Maxwell pictured on the infamous ‘Lolita Express’ with Bill Clinton (right).
Due to his power British Prime Ministers had to take his calls – Robert Maxwell with Margaret Thatcher in 1985 at Mirror Group Newspapers.American politicians were not immune to him either – Robert Maxwell with President George H. W. Bush and his wife Barbara circa 1989.Other media tycoons had to spend time with him also – Robert Maxwell with Rupert Murdoch in 1969.The royals clearly had to keep him onside also – Diana, Princess of Wales was photographed with ‘Bouncing Bob’ on multiple occasions.The Prime Minister who would do anything to keep the media mogul on side – In later years and now even still, Tony Blair has kowtowed to Rupert Murdoch again and again.Ironically, after he died at sea in November 1991, Robert Maxwell was remembered on the front page of the paper whose pension pot he had shamelessly plundered with the headline: “The man who saved the Daily Mirror.” Now, one is left asking: “Will Joe Biden actually save this tyrant’s favourite child?”
