Boo-hoo for cretinous crybaby queue jumper Phillip Schofield as the flogger of “plughole plonk” unsurprisingly gets booed at the National Television Awards
Rightly called out as a disgrace in September alongside his equally tedious This Morning co-host Holly Willoughby, smugger-than-smug flogger of “fit only for pouring down the plughole boxed wine” Phillip Schofield unsurprisingly got booed at the National Television Awards last night. They were at the OVO Arena in Wembley, London to accept the 2022 Best Daytime Award and surrounded by an audience of their peers.
Known best until he and Willoughby jumped the queues to pay respects to the late Queen as she lay in state in Westminster for laughable, lowbrow television, the “widespread backlash” against this overpaid pair of prattlers caused “concerns for the pair’s mental health” if you’d believe the MailOnline’s Brittany Chain and Sean O’Grady. If, however, you take the view of the majority of the populous into consideration instead, the public would simply rather these two tedious twerps were just taken off our telly boxes for once and for all.
Whilst Schofield and Willoughby’s bosses defended “queuegate” and expressed “serious concerns over their well-being,” it was made clear again last night that even those in their industry have also had quite enough of the audacious antics of this awful duo.
In response to the “outrageous scandal,” a Change.org petition started by a woman named Laura Harrison argued:
“Holly Willoughby and Phillip Schofield, two hosts of one of the most damaging to mental health day time TV shows This Morning, were able to push past those thousands and get immediate access [those waiting to pay their respects to the late Queen].”
“I’d like to see This Morning axed for good as I do believe it causes more harm than good, without people noticing. For example, like turning cost of living anxiety into a game show. At the least though, these presenters Holly and Phillip should finally be removed from our TV screens. They’ve monopolised way too long.”
“If you agree, please sign. If enough people sign we can show ITV that the public do matter. And these two don’t deserve our time.”
As of this morning at 11.30am, the total number of signatures to the petition had reached 79,000. It is time ITV paid attention to the public and axed not only This Morning’s Phillip Schofield and Holly Willoughby but also ridded their channel of the equally repugnant harpy hosts of the sexually salacious Loose Women.
Cretinous crybaby Schofield is an attention seeking berk who well and truly should be silenced for once and for all.Instead of skipping queues and upsetting the nation in the process, the all-round-angry man and ‘This Morning’ host and ex-sidekick of Gordon the Gopher should quit his ITV job and focus on improving his deservedly slammed boxed wines. He thought his red “perfect with olives” whilst the public thought it “better poured down the plughole.”Telly box legend Christine Hamilton showed her outrage for Phillip Schofield on 16th September when she highlighted how footballer David Beckham queued with the public whilst the ‘This Morning’ host “queue jumped.” She highlighted the lack of “special treatment” for the ex-England footballer with the ITV presenter’s arrogance and concluded: “Has he endured the privations of the queue? Has he hell. What in God’s name is he doing? Who the hell does he think he is?”Phillip Schofield was photographed Matthew McGreevy on a number of occasions. In 2020, various publications reported about the links between the two during the latter’s youth.
The temper tantrum prone television presenter with his ‘friend’ Mr McGreevy at a later date when they worked together. Whether they are still in contact or friends still even is unknown.Please sign our petition to get the equally repugnant ‘Loose Women’ axed from ITV. Started in 2018, it has yet to gain the traction of the ‘Axe Phillip Schofield and Holly Willoughby from TV’ on Change.org, but it deserves to now be revived. In it, at the time of launching it, Matthew Steeples stated: “ITV1’s ‘Loose Women’ celebrates all that is toxic about womankind. Their latest debacle, involving Coleen Nolan making Kim Woodburn cry on air, is indicative of how low this show stoops. On another occasion Judy Finnigan suggested the convicted rapist Ched Evans deserved to be allowed to return to playing football. There have been plenty of other examples involving Katie Price, Gloria Hunniford and Linda Robson that simply provide illustration of how tawdry this programme – screened when mothers are surely watching with young children – is. ITV – Do the decent thing. Axe ‘Loose Women.’”
Rotten-to-his-core convicted paedophile ‘entertainer’ Rolf Harris may have cancer, but his refusal to apologise to his multiple victims speaks volumes as to his continuing vileness
In August, it was announced that the nonagenarian nonce Rolf Harris would be featured in a forthcoming ITV documentary titled Hiding In Plain Sight, but now the perverted predator’s chums have bashed back. Ludicrously, these people of minds clearly stir-fried are attempting to garner sympathy for the sickening scumbag.
In an article for the Daily Mail Australia yesterday, the paper’s Kylie Stevens reported that the Bray, Berkshire based “disgraced entertainer” – who often used to love a nosh up at a curry house favoured by Theresa May in the locality – is, thankfully for those not keen on hearing his rip-roaringly awful renditions of the now clearly inappropriately titled Jake The Peg and Two Little Boys, “unable to speak and fed by tubes.”
“Battling neck cancer” according to “neighbours and friends” including one Portia Wooderson – who claimed: “He can’t eat anymore” – Stevens added that the author of Rolf Harris: The Defence Team’s Special Investigator Reveals the Truth Behind the Trials William Merritt whined: “He prefers to be on his own and ‘doesn’t particularly like kids’ as he ‘hates the noise.’”
Strangely, Merritt forgot to explain why this evil Tie Me Kangaroo Down Sport singing monster decided in February 2019 to “visit” the Oldfield Primary School in Maidenhead to “wave at children.” Curious that; very curious indeed.
Pictured top – Rabid ratbag Rolf Harris (left) with his dog. Supposedly his “health took a turn for the worse after the sudden death of his beloved poodle earlier this year” and (right) with his daughter repugnant daughter Bindi Nicholls and apologist niece Jenny Harris arriving at court in November 2017. It is an outrage that this arrogant cretin has more sympathy for a dead dog than his victims and that he penned a song called ‘Gutter Girls’ of them in 2015 is shocking though not surprising. Shame on him.
Should convicted paedophile Rolf Harris be forced to giving an apology to his victims or offered sympathy following news that this rotten-to-his-core abuser has cancer?
On Twitter this morning, Matthew Steeples asked: “Should convicted paedophile Rolf Harris be forced to giving an apology to his victims or offered sympathy following news that this rotten-to-his-core abuser has cancer?” The overwhelming response this far was a most certain “of course he should.”That the convicted child abuser paedophile Rolf Harris “hates the noise” of children seems most perplexing given his February 2019 visit to the Oldfield Primary School in Maidenhead, Berkshire to “wave” at children. One can only surmise that this noxious nonce doth protest too much.Lady May MP is often to be found dining with her ‘Garden Gnome-like’ hubby Sir Philip in Malik’s Tandoori House in Cookham, Berkshire. Here, the owner, is pictured serving her and also posing with another regular, her constituent and convicted paedophile Rolf Harris and his wicked wife Alwyn Hughes.The evil ‘entertainer’ was convicted in an era when justice was also done with the convictions of fellow paedophiles Stuart Hall and Max Clifford.The ironically titled given his ‘love of children’ and abusing them ‘Two Little Boys’ singer with the crackpot crazy creepy Christian crooner Sir Cliff Richard. Shouldn’t the Aussie paedophile have been deported after his release from jail in May 2017?Bizarrely there are still people out there who seek to defend and justify the twisted antics of this criminal sex offender. Amongst them are individuals going by the names of William B. Merritt and Mark Walker. The book by the former of the two, a private investigator, came out remarkably in May 2022 in paperback format and shockingly attempts to claim the Australian abuser innocent and his very much-deserved convictions “sinister.” Sickeningly Merritt goes as far to allege: “Harris had no chance. Rolf was an entertainer he was a kind, artistic man who had spent most of his relying on others to manage and organize his working life. He had no experience in the rough and tumble world.”In August this year, of the Australian nonce, one Twitter user, James Tryand, shared: “When I was a child, if we naughty in class, we were sent outside the classroom to stare at the wall. For one class, this involved staring at a picture drawn by Rolf Harris when visited the school, So, for me, he will always be associated with the punishment of children.”
‘Gutter Girls’ by Rolf Harris
In 2015, this audacious Australian abuser penned a sordid ‘song’ in which he described his multiple victims as “slimy little woodworms.” It should have been banned on grounds of obscenity and was sickly titled Gutter Girls.
It outrageously went as follows:
Climb up out of the woodwork babe
From forty years ago,
The climate’s great in Britain now
For making loads of dough
You’ve festered down there long enough,
Time’s right to grab your chance
Clap eyes on a rich celebrity
And make the bastard dance
Chorus
Make him squirm, slimy little woodworm
Make him squirm, squirm, squirm
Sink your claws right in to the hilt, don’t let him go
(Group) NO! NO!
Make him burn, burn, burn
Slimy little woodworm, make him burn
Get your fifty-years-old hooks into his dough
(Group) GO BABY GO
That old bandwagon you crawled out of
(rotten to the core)
Conceals a host of foul accusers,
Twenty maybe more
My guess is they’ll slide after you
All following your stench,
Perhaps you believe you’re pretty still
Some perfumed sultry wench
Chorus
“Make him squirm”,
I can hear you singing
“Make him squirm, squirm, squirm:
Just imagine all of the money waiting there”
(Group) OH YEAH!
Make him burn, burn, burn
Come and join the feeding frenzy girls,
Don’t miss out, come on and join me for your share
As the ‘Sussex Squad’ yet again get rightly called out on Twitter, shameless socialist Jeremy Corbyn bizarrely leaps to the multi-millionaire’s defence; with an unlikely friend like him, who needs enemies?
This morning, as is so often the case, the ‘Sussex Squad’ and their mistress-in-chief the Duchess of Sussex trended on Twitter. There is nothing surprising about that – given the public’s clear dislike for the meddling menace formerly known as Meghan Markle – but now, it seems, the wicked wench has gone and got herself an unlikely super-fan: Labour’s worst ever leader, Jeremy Corbyn.
Speaking to Aaron Bastani, the co-founder of the left-wing media organisation Novara Media, on Tuesday ‘Jezza’ remarked:
“I had very nice chats with Harry and Meghan… Very interesting, interesting. Harry’s life, Harry’s life has always been totally in the public eye, but a former serving officer and so on in the armed forces and Meghan, I think, is very interesting, a very clear-thinking woman, I’ve got a lot of time for her.”
“[She’s not been treated so badly] in the last few days, in the last few days it’s been alright for the last few days. They’ve been quite warm towards her, but she, erm, before that, I think the treatment of her has been appalling.”
“It’s led by the media wanting to, erm, I don’t know why, they just wanted to build her up into a negative figure, which she’s not. She is an intelligent, thoughtful woman.”
“I absolutely think there’s a racial component to it, absolutely, yeah. I do.”
“I mean, erm, who? Why? That’s speculation, but you know, she is a very able person and she’s got a great contribution to make and lots of radical ideas. She’s a good speaker, good, good.”
“I think that’s what the stress is [a career outside her marriage]… Well, the Duke of Edinburgh always called it ‘The Firm’ because they should be, click, like that. [She wasn’t up that]… NOPE! That’s what I understand, yeah.”
“Like that, where there’s any family stress, it’s very difficult to cope with. Look at it from the human point of view.”
Who’d have thought a far-left socialist and a woman living in a £14 million mansion in Montecito would end up besties? They say stranger things happen, but in this curious case they most certainly already have.
Who’d have thought a leftie like Jeremy Corbyn would want to become a mouthpiece for the meddling menace that is the woman formerly known as Meghan Markle? Perhaps this hypocritical toerag is angling for a holiday at her Montecito mansion?
What’s the truth about the stories that abound about the Duchess of Sussex?
Of her claiming having got married the day before she actually did, Mr Markle stated: “Lying about the archbishop? How can you say: ‘We’ve been married three days before we got married’? Her lies are so obvious, I don’t know why she says them.”
Her very own half-sister, Samantha, who is currently bringing a defamation case against her, has called her out as a liar on multiple occasions also. It has been proven that the duchess’s claim that she hasn’t seen her sibling in over 20 years was proven untrue when a photo of the pair 13 years ago emerged.
Her very own half-brother, Thomas Jr., said of her: “I told Prince Harry, I think she’s going to ruin your life. She’s very shallow… She’s a phony, a bully, a jaded, shallow, conceited woman.”
The wife of Prince Harry has been called out on multiple occasions for spinning stories against other members of the royal family, most especially the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge.
Staff who’ve worked for her have complained that she is a bully and investigations into this remain ongoing.
The Duchess of Sussex is a known manipulator of the press and paparazzis and it has been claimed that she’ll “twist the truth” to get any headline she wants.
Questions remain as to how many times she’s actually been married in total. Some say twice, some say thrice.
Questions remain also as to what engagement the duchess has had with meddlers such as Christopher Bouzy, Omid Scobie and her other ‘Sussex Squaddies’ and also as to what her deals with the likes of Netflix and Spotify involve her ‘spilling.’
Did the ‘Montecito Meddler’ meet Prince Andrew or Prince Harry first? Rumours abound that she could have spent time and holidayed with the former as long ago as 2001 and that her claim to have no prior knowledge of the royal family until 2016 is just utter baloney.
Boxed plonk selling plonker Philip Schofield outrages brilliantly bonkers ‘British Battleaxe’ Christine Hamilton by skipping the queue to pay respects to Her Majesty The Queen
Spectacularly right in her analysis of Schofield skipping the queue to pay respects to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II prior to her funeral on Monday, Hamilton was far from her alone in her anger at this warbling wazzock sticking two fingers up to members of the public who are now queuing for upto 24 hours to pass our wonderful former monarch for a moment whilst he just waltzed in.
Sanctimonious self-server Schofield, of course, has form. Condemned previously by Jonathan Dimbleby as “cretinous,” here is an overpaid television twerp who was laughed at as ludicrous in October 2020 for “making bizarre claims to have been murdered in a past life because of a debt” whilst promoting his “self-indulgent” ‘memoir’ Life’s What You Make Of It in an article in the Mirror.
At that time whilst desperately seeking any kind of publicity possible, the petulant and pompous This Morning presenter whined that he believed “he and an (imaginary) ‘family’ he’d plainly invented were murdered in a ‘past life’ over a debt.”
Showing himself as an utter crackpot, the definitely deranged flogger of wine condemned as “only fit for the bin” and “no more palatable than fizzy Ribena” declared:
“I opened the door to silence and felt horror wash over me. Three steps in, and I saw them – two murdered bodies on the floor.”
“I knew they were my wife and small child. Horror turned to fury. I knew why they were dead. I owed money to two brothers who worked at the end of the street in a sawmill.”
“The brother [then] found me, dragged me outside, punched me to the ground and, as my head hit the mud, he repeatedly stamped on it until I was dead!”
Behaving with dignity after a death is clearly something that this cretinous creep clearly hasn’t learnt. Shame on this ultimate television twerp; it is now time for Philip Schofield to offer an apology to the hundreds of thousands of people he pushed by without a shred of real respect.
Pictured top – Phillip Schofield looking angry whilst being noticed skipping the queue to pay respects to Her Majesty The Queen yesterday (left) and looking angry on the telly box on a previous occasion (right).
Telly box legend Christine Hamilton showed her outrage for Phillip Schofield yesterday when she highlighted how footballer David Beckham queued with the public whilst the ‘This Morning’ host “queue jumped.” She highlighted the lack of “special treatment” for the ex-England footballer with the ITV presenter’s arrogance and concluded: “Has he endured the privations of the queue? Has he hell. What in God’s name is he doing? Who the hell does he think he is?”In 2012, fellow television presenter Jonathan Dimbleby called out the ‘This Morning’ presenter as “cretinous” over his decision to present the then Prime Minister David Cameron with a list of names of alleged paedophiles during a live television segment. Mr Dimbleby concluded: “Grow up.”Instead of skipping queues and upsetting the nation in the process, the all-round-angry man and ‘This Morning’ host and ex-sidekick of Gordon the Gopher should focus on improving his deservedly slammed boxed wines. He thought his red “perfect with olives” whilst the public thought it “better poured down the plughole.”Phillip Schofield was photographed Matthew McGreevy on a number of occasions. In 2020, various publications reported about the links between the two during the latter’s youth.The temper tantrum prone television presenter with his ‘friend’ Mr McGreevy at a later date when they worked together. Whether they are still in contact or friends still even is unknown.
The Maxwell mess continues… Ghislaine Maxwell trial commentator for CNN Page Peter drowns in Georgia as Jeffrey Epstein whistleblower Maria Farmer curiously claims she was planning to move in with his Ponzi scheming “mentor” Steven Hoffenberg before his death; separately Maxwell gets sued by another of her former lawyers.
On Sunday, 55-year-old constitutional law attorney Page Peter – whose commentary for CNN during Ghislaine Maxwell’s trial was noted – became the latest with a link to the mucky madam and her case to meet an unfortunate end when he tragically drowned off the coast of Georgia.
Whilst Mr Peter was pronounced dead at the scene, his son, who had been swimming alongside him, fortunately was rescued and meanwhile in other news on Tuesday, The Sun’s Chris White “exclusively” revealed that Jeffrey Epstein’s “mentor” Steven Hoffenberg was “due to move in with the late paedophile’s first whistleblower… [and] victim” Maria Farmer “just before he died.”
Grifting conman Hoffenberg, who left behind 200,000 victims of his Ponzi scheme when his decomposing body was found in August, was ludicrously lauded by Farmer as being “like an angel to all the survivors.” Going further of the born-again Christian criminal, the 52-year-old ex-receptionist added:
“I was his family. He was my family. I’ve never had a real father, Hoffenberg was like a father to me. He was loving and kind, and he was full of remorse about trusting Epstein.”
“He spent all of his days trying to make up for what he overlooked about Epstein.”
“He lived off social security, eating barely anything. He had £1,130 ($1,300, €1,301 or درهم4,774) a month to live on including rent. That’s why I wanted him to come here because he wouldn’t have to pay rent, so he would have a bit more money.”
“He would not let me give him anything, but I finally got him to agree because I had a place for him to live, we decorated the room for him.”
“We were writing a children’s book together. But then he got really, really sick – and that was a month before he died. He died at home alone.”
“I’m glad that he’s no longer suffering. But I can tell you this, people really missed out on a great man because I got to know him.”
“He was there for us all the time. He helped if I had any legal questions, and I didn’t want to bother my lawyers, I could call him and he had the answers, as he’d retrained as a lawyer in prison.”
“He was a sounding board for us. Hoffenberg felt culpable because he didn’t pick up on Epstein, just like I didn’t at first. You feel completely guilty.”
“He always said: ‘I just need to make up for everything that’s ever happened.’”
“He was the biggest supporter to all the survivors. He prayed for each of them every day.”
In another development, on Tuesday also, the Daily Beast’s Kate Briquelet shared that Kyle R. Waldner, a counsel in the U.S. Virgin Islands office of Quintairos, Prieto, Wood & Boyer, P.A. have followed Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C. – who are suing the ‘Bouncing Czech’s’ deviant daughter, her estranged husband Scott Borgerson and her brother Kevin Maxwell for £763,285 ($878,302, €879,247 or درهم3.2 million) in unpaid legal fees – and have announced they “would stop representing her unless payment was received.”
In a filing in late August, Kyle Waldner of the firm “indicated that he [had] informed Kevin Maxwell, and [Ghislaine] Maxwell herself in a letter to her in prison at FCI Tallahassee.”
Attorney and CNN commentator on the mucky madam Maxwell’s messy trial Page Peter tragically drowned last weekend.The decomposing body of Steven Hoffenberg, the evil Ponzi schemer and “mentor” of Jeffrey Epstein, was found in a very messy house he shared in Derby, Connecticut on 23rd August.Maria Farmer’s claim that she was planning on moving Steven Hoffenberg, the criminal associate and “mentor” of the man she went to the FBI to claim she abused by, Jeffrey Epstein, into her home prior to his death in August is beyond curious.Scott Borgerson (pictured left with his new lover Kris McGlinn and right with his now estranged convicted criminal wife) is being chased for payment by Ghislaine Maxwell’s legal team. The likely costs involved are well above £1 million and the mess that the mucky madam got herself and her family into will ultimately have cost into the tens of millions.63-year old Kevin Maxwell (pictured with his sibling Isabel) is also being pursued for his convicted criminal sister’s legal costs.
The ‘Curious’ Deaths Connected To Jeffrey Epstein And Ghislaine Maxwell That Continue To Stack Up…
People who’ve moved in the orbit of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell do have a habit of coming to ‘sticky ends’ – amongst them:
Pension pot plundering tea leaf Robert Maxwell (death by ‘falling off the back of a boat’ in the Canary Islands, Spain on 5th November 1991).
Palm Beach based Ponzi schemer and paedophile Jeffrey Epstein (death by ‘suicide’ in prison in New York, USA on 10th August 2019).
Palm Beach based Ponzi scheming crook Bernard L. Madoff (death as a result of chronic kidney disease on 14th April 2021 in Butner, North Carolina).
Palm Beach based Marvin Weiner and his wife Sondra, the sister of Ponzi schemer Bernie Madoff (death by murder-suicide in Boynton Beach, USA on 17th February 2022).
Molester model agent and alleged paedophile Jean-Luc Brunel (death by ‘suicide’ in prison in Paris, France on 19th February 2022).
Convicted Ponzi scheming Donald Trump associate and self-publicist Steven J. Hoffenberg (death by causes yet unknown on date yet unknown in Derby, Connecticut, USA, decomposing body found on 23rd August 2022).
Attorney and trial lawyer Page Pate (death by drowning on the coast of Georgia on 11th September 2022) – his commentary on Ghislaine Maxwell’s trial was noted.
As the dopey Duchess of Sussex is derided for her “me, me, me” speech in Manchester, her pugnacious PR peddler Omid Scobie continues his cretinous campaign against her husband’s family
Today, as the new Prime Minister Liz Truss heads to Balmoral to see the Queen, it remains unknown as to whether her grandson Prince Harry and his wife – currently in Europe bigging themselves up in spite of the public clearly not wanting them present – will bother to do the same and pay a visit also.
In Düsseldorf today for the Invictus Games but said to be have “free time” tomorrow before being expected at the WellChild Awards in London on Thursday, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex were deservedly slammed by Gyles Brandreth yesterday on ITV’s This Morning programme.
Speaking of the dastardly duo, the much-loved veteran broadcaster and author declared: “The number of people being as sympathetic to them [the Sussexes] as they were initially does seem to be sort of thinning out a little bit… Once you make yourself the story, then you yourself become the story. What should be the story is the good works that you are doing… but, in fact, what we’re talking about is the family rift.”
Unsurprisingly, elsewhere the MailOnline’s Mark Duell referenced an intervention by Omid Scobie – who he termed “Meghan and Harry’s friend and trusted media partner” – in which the feckless Finding Freedom ‘author’ laughably claimed: “This is very much about the work [that the couple] wanted to do ever since they stepped back.” The leading “Sussex Squaddie” and all-round troll did, however, fail to mention what role paymasters’ Netflix and Spotify would play in the charade and also neglected to justify his continuing campaign against other members of Prince Harry’s family.
Turning to the speech to 2,000 young people in Manchester yesterday by the Duchess of Sussex, The Sun’s Sarah Grealish reported on a “Meg-A Snub” and shared news of the former Suits actress and her drippy husband being “booed and branded ‘fake royals’ by [the] crowd on [their] ‘me, me, me’ mini-tour.” The duchess referenced herself an astonishing 54 times during her 7-minute “nonsensical” tirade before the assembled gathering at the One Young World youth gala.
Grealish added that the couple were faced with “anti-royal placards” and “one woman accused Meghan of being a ‘liar and a hypocrite’ and of launching an ‘attack’ on the royal family.” Another, “Janet from Manchester” is said to have added: “She’s a fake humanitarian and a fake feminist. She’s a social climber… She thought she could be a celebrity in the royal family and she’s the most toxic, divisive woman I’ve ever heard of in my life.”
Pictured top – Plastic-not-anything-but-fantastic PR peddler not-a-journalist Omid Scobie (left) and his delusional puppet mistress, the Duchess of Sussex (right) yesterday in the north of England.
The ‘Montecito Meddler’ turned up looking like a scarlet woman to give her speech yesterday. It was met with derision given it was just about herself rather than inspiring to the young people who’d paid upto £1,000 to be present.On Twitter, Jimmy Failla of ‘Fox Across America’ called out the Duchess of Sussex and remarked of her: “It takes a special kind of stupid to claim women are being held back on the SAME DAY they name a Female Prime Minister” in the United Kingdom.Meanwhile this morning, after the ‘Daily Mail’s’ Richard Eden referenced “charity clearly [starting] at home for mother and daughter” behind the One Young World charity – after ‘The Sun’ reported that Kate Robertson and her daughter Ella Robertson McKay took home £634,494 in pay between them last year in spite of the pandemic, ‘The Steeple Times’s’ editor Matthew Steeples expressed surprise that “Chanel-clad” Baroness Meyer – who Eden had previously called out for her “charitable” antics” – had not got in on the act.The second son of Prince Charles and his late former wife Diana, Princess of Wales were told they were “fake royals” and to “f**k off” by one placard waving protestor. Another added: “[‘MeGain’] has used every card she can – racism, mental health, feminism. She’s not a feminist, she’s just a hypocrite.”As the duo arrived at the Bridgewater Hall, they were booed and jeered from behind barriers by an angry mob. Their demand for a “ring of steel” security curtain to shield them from such did nothing except draw further attention to how much the British public truly dislike their audacious antics.The couple’s popularity has plunged further and further into the quagmire in recent months. Nobody is surprised about that and they’re most certainly up there with non-sweating friend of child abusing sex traffickers Prince Andrew in the very, very disliked stakes.
What’s the truth about the stories that abound about the Duchess of Sussex?
Of her claiming having got married the day before she actually did, Mr Markle stated: “Lying about the archbishop? How can you say: ‘We’ve been married three days before we got married’? Her lies are so obvious, I don’t know why she says them.”
Her very own half-sister, Samantha, who is currently bringing a defamation case against her, has called her out as a liar on multiple occasions also. It has been proven that the duchess’s claim that she hasn’t seen her sibling in over 20 years was proven untrue when a photo of the pair 13 years ago emerged.
Her very own half-brother, Thomas Jr., said of her: “I told Prince Harry, I think she’s going to ruin your life. She’s very shallow… She’s a phony, a bully, a jaded, shallow, conceited woman.”
The wife of Prince Harry has been called out on multiple occasions for spinning stories against other members of the royal family, most especially the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge.
Staff who’ve worked for her have complained that she is a bully and investigations into this remain ongoing.
The Duchess of Sussex is a known manipulator of the press and paparazzis and it has been claimed that she’ll “twist the truth” to get any headline she wants.
Questions remain as to how many times she’s actually been married in total. Some say twice, some say thrice.
Did the ‘Montecito Meddler’ meet Prince Andrew or Prince Harry first? Rumours abound that she could have spent time and holidayed with the former as long ago as 2001 and that her claim to have no prior knowledge of the royal family until 2016 is just utter baloney.
Whose troll is worse? The bigots who support racist Tommy Robinson, the apologists for mucky madam Ghislaine Maxwell or Meghan Markle’s ‘Sussex Squaddies’?
Whilst Ghislaine Maxwell has pathetic PR peddling pillocks like Brian Basham and Jay Beecher still batting for her on social media in spite of the evidence pointing towards that they – just like the lawyers currently suing her for £754,000 ($878,000, €877,000 or درهم2.2 million) over their unpaid bills – won’t get a dime for their time, the likes of the Tommy Robinson and the Duchess of Sussex continue to follow her lead and encourage their deranged troll followers to harass anyone who dares call their appalling antics out.
Yesterday, when rabid racist Robinson was trending on Twitter over his hate-stoking towards Pakistani men, I dared to suggest that it rather suited his narrative of profiteering from the somewhat beyond stupid supporters who’ve funded his lifestyle for long now, I was met with comments that included suggestions that I was a “grooming gang apologist” and indeed a “nonce” myself.
Clearly endgendered with the intent of encouraging hate crimes against myself and others who agreed with my sentiments, these keyboard warriors are the kind of people that wouldn’t say boo to a goose in a pub, but assume that from behind their nasty net curtains they can make threats and issue slurs to their hearts’ contents.
In the hours that followed, after calling out one particularly obnoxious woman believed to be called Lucy Terina (whose mangled missives are shared below along with those of ‘Sussex Squaddie’ leader Christopher Bouzy), Robinson’s ranters bombarded me with hate and suggested all kinds of nonsense. In doing so, however, all they did was illustrate to anyone rational that Twitter is simply an echo room where those that shout loudest simply make the biggest berks of themselves.
The grubby groper Ghislaine Maxwell and the mendacious minx that is the Duchess of Sussex should take note – employing trolls simply puts you in the same league as the racist Tommy Robinson. Now please girls, pipe down and play nicely.
Pictured top (left to right) – A covered in milkshake Tommy Robinson, a contemplative Ghislaine Maxwell and a seriously smug Duchess of Sussex.
Is Tommy Robinson's "fan army" as bad as the Duchess of Sussex's "Sussex squaddies" in terms of their irrational delusions and deranged trolling?
Plastic-anything-but-fantastic Omid Scobie, like the equally off-his-merry-rocker chump Christopher Bouzy, peddles poison and lies for the Duchess of Sussex. He is not a journalist, but in fact someone who encourages gross mistruths about other members of the royal family to be spread. Whilst the rest of the world condemned the wicked wench formerly known as Meghan Markle for her ludicrous ‘Archetypes’ podcast, in his ‘Yahoo!Life’ column Scobie raged: “Once silenced by the establishment, it’s clear that Meghan finally has her voice back. A voice that will be very familiar to those who followed her before Harry. This time, however, she’s brought an entire movement alongside it.” No doubt his huge number of “fake” followers adored that gibberish.
Example Troll – @terinalucy1972 (Presumably actually named Lucy Terina)
The not-so-lovely London based Lucy Terina unsurprisingly backs Brexit and as well as hash-tagging that also adds: #Borisismasterofbrexit. That’s she a big fan of Tommy Robinson leads to only one conclusion about this brazen bigot and that is: “How terribly predictable.”
Example Troll – @cbouzy (Christopher Bouzy, BotSentinel)
‘Blue ticked’ by Twitter in spite of being nothing but a nasty piece of toerag, Christopher Bouzy targets anyone who dares speak out against those he’d love to be more closely involved with – namely the Duchess of Sussex and Amber Heard. He has a past clearly chequered and peppered with questionable episodes. It’s no surprise that one of Ghislaine Maxwell’s favoured mouthpieces, Jay Beecher, associates with him.
In yet again making it all about his anything but sorry self and tittle-tattling about his delusional worries about his personal security, the PR peddler for the Duchess of Sussex that is the maniac Omid Scobie yet again shows himself as nothing but a prized pillock and prat
Some people make it their life’s work to laud those that do good whilst others make it their life’s work to bring down those that behave improperly. In many ways both sets of people – and some fall into both categories variously – are to be celebrated, but then there are those that simply have to connect anything to their not at all relevant in any way to anything narrative’s to themselves.
Unsurprisingly yet again showing himself as the ultimate example of such yesterday, the rotten-to-his-core PR peddler for the Duchess of Sussex that is the maniac Omid Scobie turned a story about who ought to pay for royal security into a fantasy about his worries about his own personal security.
In a rabid rant for Yahoo! News, the – just like the deranged duchess he so toadily cosies up to – the one-time mate of the glamour model Jodie Marsh whinged and whined and then whimpered:
“I witness a lot myself, too. Thanks to a never-ending stream of false tabloid tales calling me the couple’s ‘close friend’ or ‘spokesman,’ I regularly receive an extension of their online threats. The messages range from extreme racism to disturbingly violent scenes involving the likes of dismemberment, car accidents and rape. They always get forwarded to the police.”
Clearly aimed at countering the deserved hatchet job done by Tom Bower’s Revenge: Meghan, Harry and the War between the Windsors, this as yet untitled tittle-tattling trash, according to its avaricious author, will focus on “a new chapter of the royal story and feature unique insight, deep access and exclusive revelations… [that will] have the world talking.”
Desperate to scavenge anything he can from the car wreck that is the frankly increasingly boring ‘story’ of the modern day ‘Mr and Mrs Wallis Simpson,’ Scobie should (but of course won’t) finally realise one thing: The world’s laughing at this ludicrous arse-licker and not with him and his birdbrained bosses. It’s time all three of them did something else: It’s high time the lot of them bloody well bogged off.
“The safety of others should never be up for debate” pontificated the ‘Finding Freedom’ author whilst sharing his latest bag of bilge. He pompously ended: “Reinstate Harry’s security at his own expense – before it’s too late.” Clearly a crackpot crazy conspiracy theorist, what does this berk expect to happen to the couple he has made a career out of arselicking? A car crash? Murder at the Montecito mansion Manson style? Them eaten alive by a lion?In August 2020, the ‘Daily Mail’ shared that plastic-not-fantastic Omid previously worked at gossip magazine ‘Heat’ and partied with the ‘glamour model’ Jodie Marsh. They mentioned how somebody had “airbrushed” Meghan Markle’s “entry on the online encyclopedia Wikipedia… to include more flattering details days before her romance with Prince Harry became public” and illustrated the ‘Finding Freedom’ author’s “drastic transformation” in two very different photographs. Maniac Scobie is someone who most definitely would like his past forgotten, but here again we remind him that he’s actually just a two-faced twerp.An analysis of maniac Omid Scobie’s Twitter feed clearly shows that a large proportion of his followers are a bit like himself: FAKE.Illustrating his clearly delusional desperation for attention, the ‘Finding Freedom’ author recently took to Twitter to declare: “Know that if I’m quiet at the moment, it’s because I’m busy writing – (and it feels so nice to be able to finally admit that!)… I’m always watching though.” Who on earth does this blabbering bozo think he is? MI5?On 4th August, the day the wicked wench formerly known as Meghan Markle turned maybe 41 or maybe 45, the both witty and wise ‘Daily Mail’ diarist Richard Eden tweeted: “Happy birthday to the Duchess of Sussex, who’s 41 today, or as Omid Scobie would put it, 31. #MeghanMarkle.”
Of her claiming having got married the day before she actually did, Mr Markle stated: “Lying about the archbishop? How can you say: ‘We’ve been married three days before we got married’? Her lies are so obvious, I don’t know why she says them.”
Her very own half-sister, Samantha, who is currently bringing a defamation case against her, has called her out as a liar on multiple occasions also. It has been proven that the duchess’s claim that she hasn’t seen her sibling in over 20 years was proven untrue when a photo of the pair 13 years ago emerged.
Her very own half-brother, Thomas Jr., said of her: “I told Prince Harry, I think she’s going to ruin your life. She’s very shallow… She’s a phony, a bully, a jaded, shallow, conceited woman.”
The former Meghan Markle has been called out on multiple occasions for spinning stories against other members of the royal family, most especially the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge.
Staff who’ve worked for her have complained that she is a bully and investigations into this remain ongoing.
The Duchess of Sussex is a known manipulator of the press and paparazzis and it has been claimed that she’ll “twist the truth” to get any headline she wants.
Questions remain as to how many times she’s actually been married in total. Some say twice, some say thrice. Any answer to such allegations, ‘MeGain’?
Who did this wicked wench meet first? Prince Andrew or Prince Harry?
Was the Duchess of Sussex ever associated in any way with Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell in the 2000s and 2010s?
What exactly defines the relationship between the Duchess of Sussex and Omid Scobie and Markus Anderson? Is it social, financial or is there something more to it?
As the Duchess of Sussex supposedly turns 41, pundits question whether this is yet another example of her “convenient truths” and suggest she could actually be now aged 45
Today marks, if you believe her nonsensical narrative, the 41st birthday of the Duchess of Sussex. Today, if you don’t believe her narrative and side with her estranged sister Samantha, it is actually the wicked woman formerly known as Meghan Markle’s 45th birthday.
Accused also of having “fabricated past stories to bolster her career as an actress,” the now wife of Prince Harry’s claimed, aged 13 at the time, that she kissed a boy also aged 13 when they both attended a summer camp in Santa Monica. Given, that ‘boy,’ “honour winning entertainer and author” Joshua Silverstein, is listed as having been born in 1977, that would make the pair of them 45 and most certainly not 41.
Today, as some wish her a happy birthday and others wish she’d just disappear forever into obscurity, it is time for some answers. Come on alleged ‘yacht girl’ Meghan, it’s time for the truth; how old, actually, are you?
Today on Twitter, Matthew Steeples asked: “Do you believe the woman formerly known as Meghan Markle is turning 41 today or do you believe her estranged sisters and others who suggest she might actually be turning 45?” The overwhelming response thus far suggests that the Twitterati believe the Duchess of Sussex to be telling porky pies about her real age.Samantha Markle was supposedly born on Tuesday 24th November 1964, which makes her 57 years, 8 months old. Her sister, she has claimed in legal documents is 13 years older than her, which would make her 45 years old and born in 1977 and not 41 and born in 1981 as she has claimed.At a time when the Queen has lost her husband and suffered the indignity of the embarrassment caused by her second son ‘Randy Andy’s’ antics with the likes of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, the attention seeking ways of Prince Charles’s second son and his trashbag American wife are not exactly helpful.Quora users have long speculated about and questioned the date of birth of the daughter of Thomas Markle and Dora Ragland. They, frankly, simply do not believe her suggestion of having been born on the 4th August 1981.Whatever the situation and whomever she is with, here is anything but camera shy woman who has to make utterly everything about herself.
Can anyone solve a problem like ‘MeGain’?
What year was Meghan Markle actually born in? Is she 41 and born in 1981 or is she 45 and born in 1977 as has variously been claimed?
Of her claiming having got married the day before she actually did, Mr Markle stated: “Lying about the archbishop? How can you say: ‘We’ve been married three days before we got married’? Her lies are so obvious, I don’t know why she says them.”
Her very own half-sister, Samantha, who is currently bringing a defamation case against her, has called her out as a liar on multiple occasions also. It has been proven that the duchess’s claim that she hasn’t seen her sibling in over 20 years was proven untrue when a photo of the pair 13 years ago emerged.
Her very own half-brother, Thomas Jr., said of her: “I told Prince Harry, I think she’s going to ruin your life. She’s very shallow… She’s a phony, a bully, a jaded, shallow, conceited woman.”
The former Meghan Markle has been called out on multiple occasions for spinning stories against other members of the royal family, most especially the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge.
Staff who’ve worked for her have complained that she is a bully and investigations into this remain ongoing.
The Duchess of Sussex is a known manipulator of the press and paparazzis and it has been claimed that she’ll “twist the truth” to get any headline she wants.
Questions remain as to how many times she’s actually been married in total. Some say twice, some say thrice.
Speculation about the former actress having had “hook-ups” with Matt Lauer have been doing the rounds. The former NBC news personality had his contract terminated with NBC in November 2017 after it was revealed he’d been into all sorts of sexual inappropriate behaviour in the workplace.“Humiliated” Prince Harry’s wife has been accused also of being his “puppet master” and “destroying” him. His friends are said to have “blasted” her for taking him away from them and isolating him in their Montecito mansion.In 2019, tedious twerp and ‘Unherd’ contributor Tanya Gold got the Duchess of Sussex completely wrong when she wrote in the ‘New York Times’: “Why does Meghan have the press in such paroxysms? Well, she is an interloper: divorced, American, biracial and, apparently, progressive. And she dares not only to inhabit the role of duchess but also to make it her own. Still, her critics – energized by their racism, misogyny and snobbery – can relax. She is not a revolutionary socialist, nor a convincing human rights activist who destroy everything they love. She will not bring down the royal family. In 2019, she is precisely what it needs.” Oxford educated (but Oxford hating), former alcoholic Tanya clearly ought to stick to other topics – she’s best known, after all, for also bigging-up the late paedophile Jimmy Savile as a “national treasure” and “enabling Savilisation.”
As author Kirby Sommers suggests that the then Meghan Markle likely spent time with Prince Andrew and Jeffrey Epstein before she met Prince Harry, we again highlight the mucky, murkiness and mendacious manner of this alleged “yacht girl”
In January 2020, following a tip from a renowned journalist from a national newspaper, The Steeple Times asked: “Did the then Meghan Markle meet Prince Andrew before she met Prince Harry? Or did she meet the friend of the late paedophile Jeffrey Epstein first?”
Now, just as the fallout from Tom Bower’s Revenge book continues to excite Twitter and her pugnacious PR peddler Omid Scobie announces that he’s writing a sequel to Finding Freedom, this very question has again resurfaced.
Discussed in a 35:49-minute podcast shared on YouTube late last week, crusading author of Ghislaine Maxwell: An Unauthorized Biography Kirby Sommers examines the connections between the Duchess of Sussex, Prince Andrew, Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.
Effectively suggesting Markle’s mate, Markus Anderson of Soho House, to be a ‘connector’ going back as far as 2001, Sommers argues the mainstream media “may have a photo of her” on a yacht in Phuket, Thailand “cavorting” with Prince Andrew at the behest of the mucky madam Maxwell and the since croaked paedophile Epstein.
Going further, the author also provides evidence of Markle having been invited to the ‘Yacht Week 2016’ in Croatia by an individual named Adam Haun. Founded by William Wenkel in 2006 and described as “Sodom and Gommorah at sea” by GQ in 2015, it is unknown whether then actress attended the hedonistic “Tinder at sea” event that one participant, Sweet Home Alabama dating show ‘bachelor’ Tribble Reese lauded as “like the Bahamas on steroids!”
Concluding on Twitter, Sommers observed: “[The Duchess of Sussex] is controlled by the same forces that controlled Jeffrey Epstein.”
The Duke and Duchess of Sussex and the Duke of York andn their representatives, unsurprisingly, failed to respond to requests for comment.
A man believed to be Markus Anderson pictured on a yacht in Phuket, Thailand with Prince Andrew in 2001.
Tweets by crusading author of ‘Ghislaine Maxwell: An Unauthorized Biography’ Kirkby Sommers about the connection between the Duchess of Sussex, the Duke of York and the late Jeffrey Epstein:
Of her claiming having got married the day before she actually did, Mr Markle stated: “Lying about the archbishop? How can you say: ‘We’ve been married three days before we got married’? Her lies are so obvious, I don’t know why she says them.”
Her very own half-sister, Samantha, who is currently bringing a defamation case against her, has called her out as a liar on multiple occasions also. It has been proven that the duchess’s claim that she hasn’t seen her sibling in over 20 years was proven untrue when a photo of the pair 13 years ago emerged.
Her very own half-brother, Thomas Jr., said of her: “I told Prince Harry, I think she’s going to ruin your life. She’s very shallow… She’s a phony, a bully, a jaded, shallow, conceited woman.”
The former Meghan Markle has been called out on multiple occasions for spinning stories against other members of the royal family, most especially the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge.
Staff who’ve worked for her have complained that she is a bully and investigations into this remain ongoing.
The Duchess of Sussex is a known manipulator of the press and paparazzis and it has been claimed that she’ll “twist the truth” to get any headline she wants.
Questions remain as to how many times she’s actually been married in total. Some say twice, some say thrice.
