The Steeple Times

Category: Media Matters

  • More Money For Operation Grange – Is ‘Missing’ Madeleine McCann Search To Get Top-Up On £14m Already Wasted?

    More Money For Operation Grange – Is ‘Missing’ Madeleine McCann Search To Get Top-Up On £14m Already Wasted?

    As a girl brought up in Poland goes on ‘Dr Phil’ to claim to be Madeleine McCann, why is Operation Grange likely to receive a top-up on the £14 million already wasted? Why not help fund the search for other missing people instead?

    A Twitter poll still running by The Steeple Times’s Matthew Steeples this morning stands at around 95% in favour of the Home Office ending funding to Operation Grange – the investigation into the ‘disappearance’ of Madeleine McCann.

     

    Established on 12th May 2011 after the daughter of doctors Gerry and Kate McCann went missing in Praia da Luz, Portugal on 3rd May 2007 aged just three years old, the Metropolitan Police Specialist Crime Command unit ‘investigative review’ became an ‘investigation’ subsequently.

     

    Funded to the tune of the astonishing sum of nigh on £14 million to date in spite of finding nada, nowt, nothing, the Daily Mail’s Elizabeth Haigh this morning shockingly claimed: “Police probing disappearance of Madeleine McCann ‘are set to get hundreds of thousands of pounds in new funding.’”

     

    Going further, Haigh added:

     

    “A significant sum has been requested by the Met Police and is likely to be approved by the Home Office, The Sun reports.”

     

    “Each year hundreds of thousands of pounds are spent on attempts to find her… A source close to the ongoing investigation last night said her parents would be ‘delighted’ with the news. The source said: ‘This is excellent news. Maddie’s parents Kate and Gerry will be delighted. It gives fresh hope.’ There had been fears the probe into the toddler’s case could be cut back amid budget cuts.”

     

    At a time when the general public are enduring poverty, food banks and struggling due to the cost of living crisis, this is frankly outrageous and turning to such, former Metropolitan Police detective Peter Bleksley was quite rightly quoted as stating:

     

    “As long as there are unanswered questions I can see why there is a case. But, in this time of squeezed budgets, I can also see why eyebrows would be raised. I understand the frustrations of missing children who do not have the luxury of such ongoing funding.”’

     

    Elsewhere this weekend, a woman claiming to be the ‘disappeared without a trace’ now 19-year-old has appeared on the American talk show Dr Phil to claim: “I believe I’m Madeleine McCann.”

     

    Julia Wendell – a young lady brought up in Poland andgenerally assumed to have – “really believes” she could be Kate and Gerry’s McCann’s “long-lost child after recognising Kate McCann’s voice,” according to LBC.

     

    Miss Wendell – who is being bizarrely aided by a medium and private investigator named Dr Fia Johansson – is “currently awaiting the results of a genetic test and submitted three DNA samples and a genetic test, which will help determine her ancestry.” She stated:

     

    “A lot of you ask why Kate and Gerry are not involved. There is no need. Madeleine McCann’s DNA is already there. They don’t need to get involved with media press.”

     

    “I want to say something to Kate McCann: I listened to a song that you sang to your daughter Madeleine. When I hear your voice – from movies, from interviews – I feel like I really know this voice, your voice. I really believe that I could be Madeleine.”

     

    Miss Wendell “wants to be part of the [McCann] family;” God help her.

     

    Editor’s Note – Unlike as is the case in many publications, this article was NOT sponsored or supported by a third-party. Follow Matthew Steeples on Twitter at @M_Steeples.

     

    Pictured Top – ‘Missing’ Madeleine McCann (left) and Julia Wendell, a girl from Poland, who is currently claiming to be the ‘missing’ child.

     

    This morning on Twitter, Matthew Steeples asked: “Is Home Office justified in even considering giving Operation Grange further funding on top of £14m already wasted on search for ‘missing’ Madeleine McCann? Shouldn’t £££ go towards searching for other missing people instead?” As of 11:30am on Monday 27th March 2023, over 90% of respondents unsurprisingly favoured the answer: “Yes; fund finding others.” The Metropolitan Police and Home Office should, but likely won’t pay attention.
    Ben-Needham-and-Martin-Allen
    Missing still yet little to no police resources for their cases… Ben Needham disappeared in Kos, Greece on the 24th July 1991 aged 1 and his mother gets little help for her search; Martin Allen disappeared in London on 5th November 1979 aged 15 and though his brother, Kevin, keeps the case in the public eye as much as he can, he gets little to no help from the Metropolitan Police. Why won’t the police consider reallocating resources away from Operation Grange towards the search for other missing people? £14 million has been wasted for nothing, after all. What are they hiding?
    Tennis-and-jogging
    A sense of priorities… Madeleine McCann on a tennis court prior to her ‘disappearance’ in May 2007 and her parents out running near the resort she ‘disappeared’ in the days after her ‘disappearance.’
    Gerry-and-Kate-McCann-Theresa-May
    Living-it-up… Gerry McCann enjoying a round of golf (left); Kate McCann at Downing Street, London hobnobbing with Missing People CEO Martin Houghton-Brown, the Duchess of Gloucester and the then Home Secretary Theresa May on 23rd May 2012 (right).
    Sir-Richard-Branson-Sir-Christopher-Meyer-Baroness-Catherine-Meyer-Sir-Philip-Green
    Brown nosing with a ragbag of rotten rubbish… Amongst those to have supported the McCanns have been especially gobby attention seekers including job wrecker Sir Richard Branson, “Chanel-clad” charity begins at home tin banger Baroness (Catherine) Meyer and her pompous arsehole late ex-husband Sir Christopher Meyer and job wrecking grabber Sir Philip Green.
    Ghislaine-Maxwell-Madeleine-McCann
    In 2009, private investigators for Gerry and Kate McCann issued an E-FIT to the media of a woman they believed could be “potentially significant” to their investigation. She has never been found, but, speculation online (entirely unproven as accurate thus far) has regularly included: “She looks remarkably like Ghislaine Maxwell.” There is no suggestion that this is one and the same woman, but it would be ever so helpful if the convicted nonce sex trafficker Miss Maxwell came forward and cleared this up for once and for all.
    Gerry-McCann-Sir-Clement-Freud-Ghislaine-Maxwell-857x1024-1
    Pictured above: Since croaked paedophile Sir Clement Freud (right) lunched with Gerry (left) and Kate McCann in Praia da Luz in Portugal in July 2007, two months after their daughter’s disappearance. Mrs McCann later praised the risotto as “the best she’d ever tasted.” Pictured below: Ghislaine Maxwell pictured at the launch of a book about Sir Clement’s brother, Lucian, titled ‘Breakfast With Lucian’ in 2013 by Geordie Greig. Also in the image are Nicholas Coleridge, Piers Morgan, an unknown child, Geordie Greig and Ariadne Calvo-Platero.
    In December 2017, when £11 million of British taxpayers’ money had been spent towards the search for ‘missing’ Madeleine McCann, 86% of viewers of ITV1’s ‘Loose Women’ said the public purse should cease to fund the investigation. Now, in January 2023, with that sum now well in excess of £14 million (aside from the millions in private money also), it is time to allocate resources to the search for missing people who actually can be found, we would suggest. Shouldn’t 2023, when many suffer because of the cost-of-living crisis, be the time that this pointless waste of funds finally ends?

    Missing Madeleine – Questions STILL without Answers… £14 million wasted on Operation Grange… Why continue? Why waste more? Why not help others?

    Many questions about what happened on the evening of the disappearance of Madeleine McCann remain. Some that have been highlighted by the press and discussed online include:

     

    • Why did Kate McCann refuse to answer 48 questions put to her by the Portuguese police?

     

    • Why were certain records of phone calls on the evening of the disappearance “whoosh-clunked” from the memories of the phones of Mr and Mrs McCann and the ‘Tapas 7’?

     

    • Why were relevant mobile phone records never handed over to the authorities in spite of them potentially being useful to the search?

     

    • Why did the couple not use the babysitting service on offer in the holiday resort on the evening of 3rd May 2007 when they went out on the razzle dazzle with friends?

     

    • Why was the door to the apartment – which opened directly onto a public highway – left unlocked with three children aged under three years old alone inside?

     

    • Why did a British sniffer dog sense the smell of a corpse in a cupboard in the apartment from which Madeleine McCann disappeared?

     

    • Why did a sniffer dog also supposedly sense the smell of a corpse in a vehicle hired by the couple a month after the disappearance of their daughter?

     

    • Why did the McCanns repeatedly try to discredit the work of the sniffer dogs and their handlers?

     

     

     

    • Why have the McCanns attempted to ‘gag’ anyone who disputes their version of events – most especially Gonçalo Amaral?

     

    • Why, given over £14 million has been spent on this search to date, has nobody come forward with any sighting of ‘missing’ Madeleine McCann given the very, very substantial rewards on offer?

     

  • Intimidation Tactics At Work… Luke Mitchell’s Mother’s Caravan Storage Site Burnt To Ground

    Intimidation Tactics At Work… Luke Mitchell’s Mother’s Caravan Storage Site Burnt To Ground

    Matthew Steeples asks: “Are intimidation tactics at work with a suspected arson attack on the caravan storage site formerly owned by the mother of Luke Mitchell?” and speaks with Dr Sandra Lean and Shaun Attwood about this most curious case

    On Friday, the caravan storage site formerly owned by Corrine Mitchell, the mother of Luke Mitchell, was mysteriously torched.

     

    Whilst Mrs Mitchell, whose son was convicted of killing his then girlfriend Jodi Jones in 2003, no longer owns the aforementioned property in Midlothian, that it was likely the subject of an arson attack is indicative of how passions continue to run high in a case where many believe the wrong man was convicted.

     

    Speaking exclusively to The Steeple Times on Saturday evening, Dr Sandra Lean remarked:

     

    “Almost twenty years after the murder of 14-year-old Jodi Jones in Easthouses, Midlothian, a building was set ablaze in a nearby field on Friday, 17th March 2023. Gas bottles inside the building could be heard exploding from half a mile away and residents in houses directly across the street were terrified – there was a petrol station right next door.”

     

    “But what do the two events – the murder of Jodi Jones and the burning of an apparently random building, have in common? On the surface, nothing. The building and the land on which it sits belong to the local council. But that is now. Until just over two years ago, the building was the former shop and workshop of a caravan sales business – Scotts Caravans – belonging Corinne Mitchell – the mother of the boy convicted of Jodi’s murder, Luke Mitchell.”

     

    “Luke has always protested his innocence, but, such was the level of hostility and hatred instigated by the media coverage of the case, both at the time and over the years since, that Scotts Caravans was targeted repeatedly.”

     

    “After Luke was convicted, a deliberately started fire destroyed a large number of caravans stored at the site. After his appeal failed, another fire destroyed the remainder. Corinne Mitchell, who was never convicted of any wrongdoing – whose only ‘crime’ was continuing to try to tell the world that her son was innocent – lost everything. Her home, her business, her son, her health.”

     

    “She was, after her son, the most hated person in the area. In the end, she was homeless and penniless, living in the corrugated tin building that had once been the shop and workshop area of her thriving business. For six years, she lived there with no electricity, no running water, no toilet, no heating and no money.”

     

    “When Channel Five filmed a documentary about the case – and the horrific circumstances in which Corinne was living – Midlothian Council finally housed her. The documentary attracted a huge amount of new – and this time, positive – attention to the case.”

     

    “Local people were furious to discover they had been misled as the truth about the case began to be exposed – dishonesty by witnesses close to the victim’s family which deflected attention from them and guided it towards Luke. It was easy to do back in 2003 – the media decided, from the off, that he was Jodi’s killer, naming and photographing him, at the age of just 15, telling readers he was ‘the only suspect.’ Two ex-detectives in the documentary concluded otherwise – there were, they discovered, others much closer to the victim’s family, who should have aroused far more suspicion than Luke Mitchell.”

     

    “For two years, debates have raged about this case, both locally and throughout Scotland. But in December last year, more wrongdoing was exposed – this time, Police Scotland were caught, red-handed, destroying evidence that could have taken the case back to the court of appeal and seen the conviction of Luke Mitchell overturned. Local attention turned to those identified in the documentary as other, potential ‘persons of interest.’ Those people fought back – there have been reports of threats, harassment and intimidation by those people, towards people now speaking out in support of Luke. Tensions, once again, were running high.”

     

    “And then, on Friday, the last remaining reminder of Scotts caravans was set alight. Locals took to social media in droves, concluding that this was an act of outright intimidation, intended to scare those fighting to have the case re-examined, into silence. To hurt and punish Corinne Mitchell again, for having the audacity to stand by her son. If that was the intention, it did neither. While the symbolism wasn’t lost on many, ultimately, an old, abandoned building belonging to the council was burned to the ground and the campaign to have Luke Mitchell’s case re-examined carries on unhindered.”

     

    Going further and also speaking exclusively to The Steeple Times this morning, the podcaster Shaun Attwood very clearly added:

     

    “Everyone I have interviewed who has been in prison with Luke Mitchell has stated that they truly believe he is innocent.”

     

    Today, I join with those demanding further investigation into this matter. Whether he is innocent or guilty, the potentially unsafe case of the conviction of Luke Mitchell requires a complete reinvestigation.

     

    Editor’s Note – Unlike as is the case in many publications, this article was NOT sponsored or supported by a third-party. Follow Matthew Steeples on Twitter at @M_Steeples.

     

    This morning on Twitter, Matthew Steeples asked: “Was the fire on Friday at the caravan site formerly owned by the mother of Luke Mitchell a signal of intimidation at a time when Corinne Mitchell and others are campaigning for a review of the case of the murder of Jodi Jones?” As of 11:00am on Sunday 19th March 2023, a very clear majority of respondents (84%) favoured the second of the two options: “Yes, a definite warning.”
    Fire
    The fire that took hold at Scotts Caravans on Friday 17th March 2023. Was this an accident or was it arson?
    Jodi Jones
    If the wrong man is indeed in jail for the 2003 murder of Jodi Jones, her killer is likely still alive and still at large and still evading justice. If that is the case, Lothian and Borders Police have a lot of questions to answer as to why they didn’t correctly deal with the evidence available to them.
  • All That Glitters… Jim Davidson Should Apologise Over Sickening Gary Glitter Remarks

    All That Glitters… Jim Davidson Should Apologise Over Sickening Gary Glitter Remarks

    Matthew Steeples suggests Jim Davidson should admit he got it wrong in suggesting returned to jail paedophile Gary Glitter was a “remorseful’ man who “looked ready to start a new life”

    This morning, the washed-up wazzock and all-round scumbag that is Jim Davidson OBE was trending on Twitter after an interview with the ‘Mouth of the Sewer’ that is GB News’ Dan Wootton last night.

     

    Whilst Davidson – a foul-mouthed ‘5×3’ (five kids by three of his five wives) – used the interview to bang on about “smug” Gary Lineker and how he “never particularly felt welcome” at the BBC, he neglected to comment on his thoughts on the real trending news, that of the filthy paedophile Gary Glitter being returned to jail after just 38 days in a bail hostel after breaching his licence terms.

     

    Glitter – who was caught and photographed by another bail hostel resident using a smartphone to access the ‘Dark Web’ via something called ‘The Onion’ to attempt to snare further victims – had been visited by Davidson at the Isle of Wight prison where he was then housed by the former supermarket shelf-stacker Davidson in 2019.

     

    Afterwards, in June 2021, Davidson shockingly and rather casually shared of his child abusing ‘chum’:

     

    “I spoke to Paul [Gadd, AKA ‘Gary Glitter’] when I visited The Verne [prison] two years. He’s remorseful and he looked ready to start a new life.”

     

    Instead of remarking on this very, very clear ‘error of judgment,’ speaking to Dan Wootton on GB News yesterday regarding the BBC’s #GaryGate debacle, Davidson raged:

     

    “My political interest was cast upon me way before at Thames Television when I had The Jim Davidson Show and a man called John Howard Davis, who was a BBC producer, turned up and got rid of me and Benny Hill overnight.”

     

    “And then, about a year later, I got a little cassette, a VHS, dropped on my desk by my manager and it [sic] said: ‘The BBC want you.’”

     

    “I said: ‘What’s that?’ They [sic] said: ‘They want you to do this, it’s some rotten show about snooker, so me and John Virgo went and did that show and I never particularly felt welcome there.”

     

    “I was a smell under peoples’ noses and then one day Bruce Forsyth went sick and I stepped in and did The Generation Game. I replaced him just for a day and I wasn’t particularly good, but it made Bruce get better very quick.”

     

    “When he went to do his new deal, they said: ‘No, we’ve got Jim Davidson’ and I did The Generation Game for seven years. I did The Big Break for twelve seasons and seven seasons of The Generation Game.”

     

    “Now look at the BBC. I’m totally erased; I am the statue that’s thrown into Bristol Docks… They gave me a million quid to go away. I had a contract with a million quid’s worth of wages and they said: ‘We’ll give you a million quid if you go away; please don’t tell anyone,” but I told you ‘Danny Boy’ [Dan Wootton].”

     

    “I was worse [than anything else] because I was a working-class Tory. I was a traitor and I like to mess about and have a laugh and be rude and stuff on the rehearsals and it was all pretty much frowned upon.”

     

    “They’re more concerned in being woke and ticking boxes. You know, ticking boxes; the man said to me: ‘We have to have 8.9% ethnic minorities on every show’ and so if you couldn’t get anybody that wanted to come on Big Break who was of non-white persuasion, you had to go out and kidnap some poor bugger and throw him in.”

     

    “You know, err, it was daft and do you know what I learnt there, and I’ve been in the business forty-seven years… I’m nearly one-hundred… So, you learn a thing or two about the BBC and it’s full of people that don’t know how to make programmes. I had to tick a box and I had to be silly.”

     

    “Now, I wouldn’t have thrown Lineker off like that and having a boss called Tim. Now come on, how scary is a Tim?”

     

    “Now, anyway, you wouldn’t throw someone off; just turn them off. I can understand that it’s taxpayers’ money and I hate the BBC with a passion. It’s a toss-up between them and the NHS who I hate the most, but I, you know, I wouldn’t have got rid of him because now Tim’s shown himself as lily livered.”

     

    “[Lineker] can now say what he wants, can’t he? He’s won and he’s going to be even smugger. Smug, smugger.”

     

    “It’s upto Tim and all those silly people [what the BBC does next] and now they want to get rid of the chairman ‘cos he arranged some loan or helped Boris [Johnson]. Now, everyone’s just picking on one another. I think the BBC have lost the public; they’ve lost the dressing room.”

     

    “You know, who do we watch now? GB News, anything but BBC. What does the BBC stand for? ‘Bring Back Corbyn,’ ‘Bring Back Communism.’”

     

    “You know, it is a joke and we have to pay for it whether we like it or not. You know, let’s scrap it and watch GB News all day long.

     

    Responding, this morning on Twitter, I asked:

     

    “As Jim Davidson trends, should he apologise for his June 2021 remark: “I spoke to Paul Gadd [Gary Glitter] when I visited The Verne [prison] two years ago. He’s remorseful and he looked ready to start a new life” given the paedo has been recalled to prison after being caught on Dark Web?”

     

    Other Twitter users took up the mantle and amongst comments were:

     

    “I wonder if Jim Davidson still believes that Gary Glitter is remorseful and ready to start a new life?”

     

    “Remember when Jim Davidson was funny? Me neither.”

     

    “Fun Fact: For years the BBC didn’t give a flying sh*t about their right-wing so-called ‘comedian’ Jim Davidson’s racist/misogynistic stage show when he was hosting their flagship Saturday night show ‘The Generation Game’ #IStandWithGaryLineker.”

     

    All that Glitters is not gold; all that is Jim Davidson is utterly toxic and now it is time for the latter to apologise for getting it well and truly wrong about one of the most evil men ever to set foot on this planet.

     

    Editor’s Note – Unlike as is the case in many publications, this article was NOT sponsored or supported by a third-party. Follow Matthew Steeples on Twitter at @M_Steeples.

     

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KGGBmDZbfgE
    TRAILER – Matthew Steeples will be ‘live’ with Shaun Attwood to discuss his views on Gary Glitter being returned to the clink after breaching his licence terms whilst in a bail hostel on Wednesday 15th March at 6pm GMT. Please do tune in and please do ask away.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ylQ6N-_gPRQ&t=0s
    FULL EPISODE – This will be ‘live’ for the first time at 6pm GMT on Wednesday 15th March 2023. View here.
    This morning on Twitter, Matthew Steeples asked: “As Jim Davidson trends, should he apologise for his June 2021 remark: “I spoke to [Gary Glitter] when I visited The Verne [prison] 2 years ago. He’s remorseful and he looked ready to start a new life” given the paedo has been recalled to prison after being caught on Dark Web?” He gave the options: A) “Yes, disgraceful remark”; B) “No, second chances matter”; C) “Cancel Davidson and Glitter” and D) “Couldn’t care less.” By 11:30am on Wednesday 15th March 2023, the majority of respondents favoured the idea of the cancellation of this noxious pair of grifters.
    Dan Wootton Jim Davidson
    GB News is about the only channel that will now accept the weird warblings of these two utter berks.
    Gary Glitter Jim Davidson
    A pair of toerags forever linked by a hashtag.
    Nonce Defender
    Twitter users have rightly mocked the ‘entertainer’ over his decision to visit a disgraced ‘singer’ who abused children as young as 10 years old in prison. What on earth was it about the paedophile-nonce-monster Gary Glitter that attracted Jim Davidson to visit him in prison? An answer is required. The public should be told.
    Jim Davidson Jimmy Savile
    Those that think Gary Lineker was WRONG to tweet about politics whilst working for the BBC should be reminded that both Jim Davidson and the late paedophile Sir Jimmy Savile openly campaigned for the Conservative Party and that both men also worked for the BBC. It is pure hypocrisy to call out Mr Lineker on this basis.
    It is very clear that Dan Wootton has no nous when it comes to questioning Jim Davidson. Mr Wootton is clearly not a journalist prone to drilling into real stories; he just PR peddles for his chums.

    Deserved “Public Hate Figure” Jim Davidson OBE’s Worst Moments…

    On Great Yarmouth:

    “Full of fat children of all colours.”

     

    On London and the UK:

    “I am never coming to London again… I may as well go to Dubai and be an ethnic minority there than wait five years till I become one here.”

     

    On former UKIP leader Nigel Farage:

    “The Jim Davidson of the political world.”

     

    On beating up one of his four ex-wives:

    “We’re like a couple of boxers. On the first occasion, I poked her in the eye by accident. I actually went for the mouth… The second time I gave her a shiner. I threw a bunch of keys which whacked her in the eye. Just for a giggle she kept blackening it up to make it look worse.”

     

    “I took the wife out last night; one punch!”

     

    On supposedly giving up on making jokes about black people:

    “I can’t do impressions of Frank Bruno or Ian Wright? That’s racist, is it? But I can do Sven-Göran Eriksson?”

     

    “I’m not going to get on my knee, and I’m not going to go ever black person I see, ‘hail you.’ I’m not going to apologise for the past; the past was the past.”

     

    On Black Lives Matter protestors:

    “Pondlife… F**king stupid.”

     

    Of his thoughts about his chum Boris Johnson:

    “Don’t listen with mother.”

     

    On Piers Morgan (after he was paid to appear on his Life Stories programme):

    “You don’t deserve to listen to anyone’s life story because you don’t f**king listen.”

     

    On the BBC and the NHS:

    “I was a smell under peoples’ noses… I’m totally erased; I am the statue that’s thrown into Bristol Docks… They gave me a million quid to go away.”

     

    “I hate the BBC with a passion. It’s a toss-up between them and the NHS who I hate the most.”

     

    Proving himself the ultimate ‘Brain of Britain’:

    “People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die.”

     

    After being declared bankrupt:

    “My problem is money.”

     

    On himself:

    “I could cure Aids and give £1 billion to womens’ groups and people would still think I was a racist, sexist twat”.

     

    “I’m a homophobic arsehole.”

     

  • Two Bit Tice – ‘Monster’ Fearing Richard Tice Rages In Support Of ‘#LockdownFiles Leaker Lover’ Isabel Oakeshott

    Two Bit Tice – ‘Monster’ Fearing Richard Tice Rages In Support Of ‘#LockdownFiles Leaker Lover’ Isabel Oakeshott

    After Matthew Steeples called out ‘leaky #lockdownfiles sieve’ Isabel Oakeshott, her ‘chlorinated chicken chap’ Reform UK leader and TalkTV host Richard Tice bizarrely enquired of him: “What kind of monster are you?”

    “Let’s Make Britain Great” is the predictably and very clearly ‘borrowed’ strapline used by Reform UK, a ‘political party’ – which actually is just an entity registered in England and Wales as company number 11694875. The Donald Trump-esque mantra is used as part of an attempt to attract swivel-eyed right wingers to an ‘operation’ that didn’t win a single seat in the 2021 London Assembly elections; at that poll, Reform UK laughably finished in tenth position – behind the Women’s Equality, Rejoin EU, UKIP and Animal Welfare parties even.

     

    Now, in the wake of The Steeple Times having covered the scandal of Isabel Oakeshott – whom we branded “a woman who is best known not (as she claims) as a ‘journalist’ but instead as a ‘lobbyist who carries a poison pen’” back in September 2019 – having broken an NDA and released the WhatsApp messages of the equally unctuous Matt Hancock as part of a campaign named #lockdownfiles on Saturday, the ‘chlorinated chicken chap’ that is her current squeeze, Reform UK leader Richard Tice, decided to bat back directly and defend his grubby gym gear wearing lady-love.

     

    Tweeting Matthew Steeples, in several rambling rants likely written after a boozy lunch in Belgravia yesterday, ‘considerably richer than yow’ businessman and TalkTV tittle-tattler Tice very generously shared our article (“thanks, Dicky”) and remarked:

     

    “So @M_Steeples is clearly just jealous of Isabel’s success because he is a 2 bit journo of a 2 bit rag that no-one has heard of. Keep going Matthew!”

     

    Turning to COVID-19 itself, the father of three and regular yellow stickered shopper at ‘Celebrity Waitrose’ Belgavia raged:

     

    “So you do not care about the damage to children, the inhumane CareHome restrictions, the awful funeral constraints, the suicides? What sort of monster are you?”

     

    The response to his tweets has been overwhelming, but likely not quite what Tice was anticipating. Aside from being told: “Save your faux outrage, you hypocrite!” one social media observed: “Right back at ya. Stop spreading misleading information” of his ‘monster’ related question. Now Dicky dear, please do go and pour yourself a British beer and please ease your and grubby gym gear-clad Issie’s “jealousy” with that.

     

    Editor’s Note – Unlike as is the case in many publications, this article was NOT sponsored or supported by a third-party. Follow Matthew Steeples on Twitter at @M_Steeples.

     

    Pictured Top – Richard Tice decided to give Matthew Steeples a “Sunday sermon” about monsters yesterday; he did so late afternoon and likely after a few (British beer only) shandies and perhaps a boozy lunch (with non-European wines only) in Belgravia.

     

    This morning on Twitter, Matthew Steeples asked: “Yesterday, Richard Tice of the Reform Party asked: ‘What sort of monster are you?’ of me after I called out his leaky squeeze Isabel Oakeshott. Who is actual monster in story of #lockdownfiles leaking of MattHancock’s WhatsApp missives?” He gave the options of a) Isabel Oakeshott (32.6%), b) Richard Tice, (8.7%) c) himself (6.5%) and d) Matt Hancock (52.5%). As of 11.30am on Monday 6th March the results were as listed.
    Tweet 1
    58-year-old Richard Tice ‘bigs himself up’ as some kind of man of the people in spite of having a clearly very privileged past and present. Often spotted in the tony taverns of Belgravia, this former Conservative donor has been involved in amongst other things property development and investment. He was privately educated at Uppingham and is the son the late horse trainer Joan Tice DL OBE. That he claims Matthew Steeples “jealous” of his gossipy girlfriend – a woman who falsely acted as a muckspreader when she falsely shared fake news that David Cameron had performed a sexual act on a dead pig – is proof permanent that he’s the one who is actually off his merry rocker. “Keep going Dicky!”
    Tweet 2
    Called out by Steeples after he suggested him a “2 bit journo of a 2 bit rag,” Tice responded: “What sort of monster are you?” He didn’t find a very positive response to his idiotic question from the majority of social media users.

    Social media responds to Richard Tice’s rambling rants and questions about monsters…

    Responding on Twitter and Facebook to the missives to Matthew Steeples, social media users observed of Tice and Oakeshott:

     

    “Two-bit? Do you mean The Steeple Times? I read it all the time as do all in the know; distinguished and principled journalism – especially compared to the dross trotted out by your squeeze.”

     

    “You’re a professional troll and so is Oakeshott. Who is paying you?”

     

    “[Oakeshott] had these messages two years ago. Why is she only concerned about those issues now? What sort of monster is she?”

     

    “The problem you have is that you are even more wrong than the government were!”

     

    “Don’t try to kid us you care. You’ve tried to exploit the release of that information with your partner in an attempt to inflict political damage & now you pretend you care? You’re a 2 bit crappy grifter like Farage. I wouldn’t trust you with a lettuce, let alone our rights.”

     

    “Save your faux outrage, you hypocrite! What about the damage to children currently suffering from Long Covid? I don’t hear you utter a bloody word about them!”

     

    “If Isabel had been a decent person, i.e. concerned about what is in the public interest, she would have released ALL the information to ALL media without payment. We see you two for what you really are!”

     

    “You are using those examples of wrongdoing and other peoples’ real human suffering to promote your own ends. What’s worse is that you are gaslighting people by cynically pretending that you are doing it ‘because you care,’ when self-interest is always your real motive. Shyster!”

     

    “What we know is that Oakeshott released these messages at a time that was politically convenient but chose to hide the fact that Banks lied until she was exposed.”

     

    “Disgusting you are trying to manipulate peoples’ suicides for your own benefit and agenda.”

     

    “Serialised in the telegraph to maximise the news cycle/exposure. How is this about any more than @IsabelOakeshott and her personal & political agenda? It’s a massive scoop, dripping with tabloid subterfuge, but why dress it up as a crusade?

     

    “She felt it was in public interest, was disgusted… But not before the book was out. And no doubt her leakage has been handsomely rewarded, possibly even legal protection should MH sue her. She’s the reason journalists will be less trusted with confidential matters.”

     

    “They’re insulting your credibility, I thought you’d recognise that given how often it must occur.”

     

    “You are a charlatan… Trying to make political gain out of peoples’ suffering. What sort of monster are you?”

     

    “[You] didn’t care until you and [Oakeshott] could make political hay and a boatload of cash.”

     

    “None of [the things Tice supposedly ‘cares’ about] are remotely true or relevant. File them under ‘things which ill-informed fight-wingers bleat about but never actually happened. No wonder the ‘UK’ is a global pariah and laughing stock.”

     

    “It’s genuinely painful when dead-eyed sociopaths obsessed with political power no matter the cost lecture others about ‘caring.’ Your entire platform exists and feeds only on negative emotion, reactionary populism with power for its own sake as the final and only goal.”

     

    “You would happily send [sic] asylum seekers drown. F**k off with the faux humanitarianism.”

     

    “You do not care about so-called ordinary people. Stop pretending. I suspect you want an authoritarian far right tax haven complete with subservient work force.”

     

    “You can care about all of this and still think your significant other is a wrong’un. Hope this helps, Dicky.”

     

    “Like your partner, you care when it suits your agenda [Richard].”

     

    “It’s you that’s the monster… A Tory monster. The worst kind.”

     

    “Stop using peoples’ deaths for your own financial gain, you ghoul.”

     

    “[‘What sort of monster are you?’]… That last line, have you ever considered looking in the mirror and pausing to think, [Richard]?”

     

    “Right back at ya. Stop spreading misleading information.”

     

    “Nice one… Brilliant… Keep up the good work, Matthew.”

     

    “Oooh, you’ve got your knickers in a twist… Grow up Tice… You should be the leader of the Whataboutery Party.”

     

    Waitrose Belgravia chlorinate chicken yellow sticker Bollocks to Brexit
    In August 2019, ‘The Steeple Times’ shared an image of Brexiteer Richard Tice buying yellow stickered salmon at Waitrose in Belgravia. We asked: “What next? Chlorinated American chicken?” and suggested he find another yellow sticker… That yellow sticker? ‘Bollocks to Brexit.’
    John Whittingdale Isabel Oakeshott
    In September 2019, ‘The Steeple Times’ condemned Isabel Oakeshott as a “fake news creator” and shared a reader submitted photograph of her next to the “lapdance loving MP” John Whittingdale. For once, she wasn’t wearing her grubby gym gear.
    Reform UK Make Britain Again
    Reform UK bases its message most clearly on 45th POTUS Donald Trump’s message: “Let’s Make America Great Again.” It’s a message that has yet to resonate at the ballot box with the great British public. Perhaps Richard Tice should focus on that problem before worrying about ‘monsters’ that simply don’t exist.
    Grifter bike
    On Twitter, amongst much mockery, this image of a ‘Grifter’ bicycle simply shone out and had to be shared. As Norman Tebbit once argued, it might be time ‘Dicky Boy’ got on it.
  • Birdbrained Bore Bouzy Bombs – Noxious Nitwit Meghan Markle Super-Fan Christopher Bouzy Faces Trouble In 2 Court Cases

    Birdbrained Bore Bouzy Bombs – Noxious Nitwit Meghan Markle Super-Fan Christopher Bouzy Faces Trouble In 2 Court Cases

    Birdbrained Bot Sentinel bore Christopher Bouzy faces further trouble as he’s dragged deeper into two court cases concerning his definitely dubious puppet mistress Meghan Markle

    Bullying braggart Christopher Bouzy is someone you could only wish upon your worst enemy. Here is a bombastic bore whose attempts to persuade the world that his ‘statistics’ are anything other than what they truly are – and that is they are just a load of old rot – can only be surmised as an utterly tedious joke.

     

    The work of birdbrained Bouzy’s ‘organisation’ Bot Sentinel – which nonsensically claims to be all about “helping fight disinformation and targeted harassment” through “tracking” and “classifying” Twitter accounts – has long been called out as complete Barry Bull. This firm’s creepy campaign against the much-loved Welsh warbler Sadie Quinlan (AKA ‘Yankee Wally’) was beyond appalling, but now this nasty piece of toerag is facing personal trouble and strife with not just one, but two court cases involving his antagonistic antics moving forward.

     

    Fresh from his Netflix appearance peddling piffle for the Prince Harry and the woman formerly known as Meghan Markle in the docuseries Harry & Meghan in December last year, moronic mouthpiece Bouzy is being dragged deeper into two legal cases. The first is an action brought by Samantha Markle against her estranged half-sister the Duchess of Sussex whilst the second is an action brought against him personally by the attorney and commentator Nathaniel J. Broughty (better known as ‘Nate The Lawyer’ to his 280,000 YouTube followers).

     

    “It’s about hatred, it’s about race” whined blubbering Bouzy as he defended ‘MeGain’ and her drippy husband in the Netflix documentary which he no doubt got paid rather handsomely to appear in, but in both upcoming court cases he’ll find himself deservedly accused of being the orchestrator of exactly such himself.

     

    In the defamation case of Markle v Markle in Florida, Bouzy will be called as a witness and required to give a deposition alongside not only the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, but also Thomas Markle, Samantha Markle’s daughter Ashleigh Hale and the former royal aide Jason Knauf.

     

    Of the case, in March 2022, Thomas Markle remarked: “I’ve been trying for almost four years to get to see my daughter and her ginger husband in a courtroom face to face… I’d be thrilled to come to court and talk and defend my oldest daughter… There are so many obvious, obvious lies that are immediately challenged that I can’t imagine Meghan even going into the court with this… She can’t defend the things she said.”

     

    In the case of Broughty v Bouzy, in documents submitted to the United States District Court District of New Jersey on 6th February, Bouzy is described as having “no reputation to protect and little to lose by defaming a man who does.” Going further, the plaintiff argued:

     

    “Bouzy is a social media personality best known for a series of dubious online adventures—from crypto scams to phony software pitches… There is ample proof that Bot Sentinel’s social credit scores are the products, not of the rigorous algorithm Bouzy claims for them, but of views and people Bouzy does and does not like.”

     

    “Bouzy thus thrusts aside Bot Sentinel’s flimsy curtain and, in a turn whose irony was lost on no one but himself, proceeded to give the Internet a free master class on nasty, personal and racially-infused Internet trolling aimed at Mr. Broughty. From accusations of race treason – despite the fact that both he and Mr. Broughty are African Americans with a liberal political bent – to cruel mockery of Mr. Broughty’s humble origins as the child of a drug addict, and finally through a series of false and defamatory attacks on Mr. Broughty, Bouzy showed everyone exactly what social media toxicity is all about.”

     

    “Admitting that his campaign against Mr. Broughty was intended to destroy his reputation, credibility and career, Bouzy started with what must have seemed the definitive coup de main. Bouzy announced on Twitter that his own intrepid research had uncovered the fact that the famous YouTuber ‘Nate the Lawyer,’ whose livelihood depends on his identity as a lawyer, was no lawyer at all. Twitter users quickly demonstrated, however, that only a bit of competent investigation established that Mr. Broughty is in fact a member of the New York bar.”

     

    “Instead of admitting to negligence or incompetence, however, Bouzy publicly stated that, of course, he knew all along that Mr. Broughty was a lawyer, but said that he had purposely lied when he claimed otherwise.”

     

    “Emboldened by his ability to seemingly ‘get away’ with saying whatever he thought would harm Mr. Broughty, Bouzy then published a series of even more ‘damning,’ but also false and defamatory tweets. Bouzy took to Twitter and made the scandalous and fantastic claim that Mr. Broughty had, during his career as a cop, planted and falsified evidence on criminal drug suspects. Bouzy knew that promulgating this lie would render Bouzy [editor’s note: Ought to read “Broughty,” a mistake in legal document] unreliable as a source of criminal law and social commentary on YouTube.”

     

    “It was a lie, however, and Mr. Broughty immediately demanded its retraction. But Bouzy has never been held accountable in his decades of lying on the Internet, and was not about to start now. He did not merely refuse to retract these false claims; he dared Mr. Broughty to sue him for defamation. Mr. Broughty’s hand was forced.”

     

    Editor’s Note – Unlike as is the case in many publications, this article was NOT sponsored or supported by a third-party. Follow Matthew Steeples on Twitter at @M_Steeples.

     

    Follow and support Samantha Markle on Twitter at @_SammyMarkle.

     

    Follow and support Nate Broughty on Twitter at @NatetheLawyer and back his GoFundMe fundraiser by clicking here.

     

    Pictured Top – The Bot Sentinel and Spoutible founder (left) and Samantha Markle with her now estranged sister in happier times (right).

     

    Duke and Duchess of Sussex
    The Duke and Duchess of Sussex went to America to seek “privacy,” yet all they’ve done since is seek out publicity. Be it through Netflix, Spotify or ‘Spare,’ this couple have well and truly tripped themselves up and as much as their PR peddling supporters – such as Omid Scobie and Christopher Bouzy – try, they face simply becoming more and more unpopular on both sides of the pond.
    Christopher Bouzy Nathaniel Broughty
    The war of words between the bombastic Bot Sentinel bore Christopher Bouzy and ‘Nate The Lawyer’ Nathaniel Broughty looks set to intensify in the coming months.
    Tweet 1
    ‘Nate The Lawyer’ claimed earlier this week that Bouzy wanted to settle with him.
    Tweet 2
    Bouzy fired back with further defamatory tweets about his opponent ‘Nate The Lawyer’ by remarking: “I beg no one, especially an unemployed YouTube troll thirsty for relevance. I am not interested in settling. Now run along and go make your 30th YouTube video about so my name can feed your family.” Clearly, the bargain bucket Bot Sentinel founder has rather a self-inflated opinion of his own ‘value.’
  • Jobs For The Girls… The Toxic Legacy Of Dame Cressida Dick And Her Connections To Sex Fiend Ghislaine Maxwell

    Jobs For The Girls… The Toxic Legacy Of Dame Cressida Dick And Her Connections To Sex Fiend Ghislaine Maxwell

    Just as the toxic culture of sexual abuse at the Metropolitan Police is highlighted, we again remind that it was a female one-time school chum of noxious nonce Ghislaine Maxwell, Dame Cressida Dick, who presided over this rotten organisation for much of this period

    “Do you feel safe around the police?” enquired Emma Barnett on BBC Radio 4’s Woman’s Hour this morning specifically in the context of the latest Metropolitan policeman-rapist David Carrick – a now convicted criminal who should never have passed vetting in the first place given accusations against him prior to and during his appointment.

     

    Ms Barnett was right to ask such, but what she very clearly missed was to observe was that the very person at the helm of this police force during much of Carrick’s time committing many of his crimes was a woman, Dame Cressida Dick DBE QPM.

     

    Currently there are about 1,000 allegations of domestic abuse or sexual offences against the Met’s 45,000 officers and staff and yet again today it has been highlighted that criminal conduct within this force has again and again been ignored. “How can it have failed again?” raged former chief constable of Nottinghamshire Sue Fish in today’s The Guardian and going further, she quite sensibly added: “If police are abusing their position to exploit those they are charged to protect, how can the institution be trusted?” She is correct and now the powers must be must put this grave situation right.

     

    Turning back more specifically to the now put-out-to-paddock Dame Cressida, the Daily Mail’s Richard Eden highlighted another scandal in which she failed to act forcefully – that of the ‘Partygate’ probe into Boris Johnson and his cronies ‘living-it-large’ at Downing Street during COVID-19 lockdowns. Eden observed:

     

    “Commander Catherine Roper, who has been confirmed as Wiltshire’s new Chief Constable, was previously in charge of the ‘Partygate’ probe into Covid breaches in Downing Street. She was given the role by Cressida Dick. In her new job, Roper will have to look after several well-known Wiltshire dignitaries – including Dick, who has a home in the county. Small world, isn’t it?”

     

    Dame Cressida’s cronyism and curious connections have repeatedly been examined in The Steeple Times. She went to the same school as the convicted sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell, Oxford High School, at the same time as her and attended the same college at the University of Oxford, Balliol. Dame Cressida’s father, Marcus Dick (1920 – 1971) just happened also to be the senior tutor at Balliol College also and in 1994, when the Metropolitan Police could have pursued allegations that Maxwell was operating an upmarket brothel from her Stanhope Mews East, South Kensington, London home, the force did nothing. Paraphrasing Richard Eden: “Strange that, isn’t it?”

     

    Editor’s Note – Unlike as is the case in many publications, this article was NOT sponsored or supported by a third-party.

     

    Pictured Top (left to right) – Continually criticised ex-Met Police chief Dame Cressida Dick, convicted sex offender David Carrick and convicted sex offender Ghislaine Maxwell.

     

    Wayne Couzens David Carrick
    Rotten to its core… Wayne Couzens and David Carrick are just two examples of sex fiends who were allowed free reign to commit crimes whilst working for the Metropolitan Police. It is now time that this force be stopped from “marking its own homework” has been an analysis repeatedly stated in the hours since the conviction of Carrick.
    Richard Eden Commander Catherine Roper
    Richard Eden’s feature this morning highlighted a bit more of “jobs for the girls” going on with the appointment of Catherine Roper as Wiltshire’s new chief constable.
    Ghislaine-Maxwell-Dame-Cressida-Dick
    Both Ghislaine Maxwell and Dame Cressida Dick grew up and were educated in the ‘City of Dreaming Spires.’ Though Dame Cressida does not appear in the former’s address book, their connections during their formative years surely must have meant that their paths crossed – especially since the former Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis’ father was the senior tutor at the very college, Balliol, where both ladies studied.
    Stanhope-Mews-East
    Since dead sex fiend Jeffrey Epstein and his since incarcerated co-collaborator sex fiend Ghislaine Maxwell (left), one-time alleged brothel owned by Maxwell between 1989 and 1997, 69 Stanhope Mews East in South Kensington (centre) and Maxwell’s former schoolmate and now ex-Met Police chief Dame Cressida Dick (right).
    69-Stanhope-Mews-East-1
    69 Stanhope Mews East, South Kensington, London, SW7 5QT was the subject of a covert surveillance exercise by the Metropolitan Police in 1994 whilst under the ownership of the pension pot plundering ‘Cap’n Bob’s’ decidedly deviant daughter. Very young ladies of a certain type were seen coming and going during the period and it was suspected by neighbours that the house was being operated as a “high-class whore house” run by a “smart looking madam.”
    69-Stanhope-Mews-East-signs
    The current occupants of 69 Stanhope Mews are clearly sick of media attention and in spite of the mews house being on a public highway recently placed a “no photography or video recording” sign in their window. They also have a problem with dogs peeing on their plant pots.
  • ‘Dirty Harry’ Helps ‘Bury Bad News’ – Shocking Jo Moore 9/11 Tactics Follow #HarryTheInterview

    ‘Dirty Harry’ Helps ‘Bury Bad News’ – Shocking Jo Moore 9/11 Tactics Follow #HarryTheInterview

    As the world media focus on ‘Dirty Harry’s’ disgraceful interviews, Westminster seizes an opportunity to “bury bad news” about MPs outrageous outside earnings and most especially Theresa May’s £2.5 million pay topup since the last election

    At 2.55pm BST on 11th September 2001, after both World Trade Center towers had been hit by aircraft propelled by Jihadists, Jo Moore, the then advisor and press officer of Stephen Byers, the then Transport, Local Government and Regions Secretary, thought it appropriate to send an email. It read: “It’s now a very good day to get out anything we want to bury. Councillors’ expenses?”

     

    Inevitably given 2,996 died that day including the 19 hijackers, Moore’s calculating communication ended up being leaked by someone no doubt quite rightly appalled at its contents and subsequently, it emerged that she’d had the gall to do it again in 2002.

     

    After Princess Margaret died on 9th February and prior to her funeral on 15th February that year at St George’s Chapel, Windsor, on 13th February 2002, an email chain emerged between her and Martin Sixsmith, the then director of communications at Network Rail, in which it was remarked: “Princess Margaret is being buried [on Friday]. I will absolutely not allow anything else to be.”

     

    Last night at 10.35pm BST, just after a ninety-minute interview with Prince Harry (AKA ‘Dirty Harry’ yet again now) – conducted by a close chum, Tom Bradby, who gave him the easiest of rides and didn’t ask any truly difficult questions of his dimwitted dunce mate of many years – splashed across news channels across the globe, a bit of ‘Jo Moore-ing’ was clearly underway at Westminster and headline information that would otherwise have been “tomorrow’s shockers” on any other day were quickly “given out.”

     

    As featured in an expose by The Steeple Times back in November last year – when nobody else in the press seemed to want to ask pertinent questions about what was actually shockingly going on when Theresa May outrageously took money to speak in the place of questionable human rights that is Saudi Arabia – last night’s ‘little leak’ centred on the outside earnings of the grasping grabbers that are British Members of Parliament.

     

    On any other day, a Sky News and Tortoise Media investigation that revealed that in total – in the last three years since the last general election – the 650 Members of Parliament that sit in the House of Commons have taken £183 million ($222 million, €208 million or درهم816 million) “in the form of second jobs, donations, free trips and hospitality, all from private sources,” would be front page news and enough to cause ‘Disgusted of Tunbridge Wells’ types everywhere to have full-on coronaries.

     

    Of their revelations, shared in an article late last night by Tortoise’s Catherine Neilan and Giles Whittell, the most amazing was that it was not the notoriously greedy former Prime Minister Boris Johnson who’d raked in the most to take top place for “side hustles,” but in fact she famed for being “naughty” by “wandering in wheat fields,” Theresa May. The Member for Maidenhead raked in over £2.5 million ($3 million, €2.8 million or درهم11.1 million) on top of her £85,000 ($103,000, €97,000 or درهم379,000) parliamentary salary.

     

    Of the astounding £107,600 ($130,600, €122,300 or درهم480,000) payment, Lady May received from the World Travel and Tourism Council for the aforementioned likely very short speech in Saudi Arabia, the Belfast Telegraph later added: “[She took this for a speech in] a country she blocked ministers and officials from visiting following the murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi.”

     

    In 2003, Jo Moore resigned. Supposedly, she’s now a teacher, but whether she teaches the “art of communication” is unknown. If she does, perhaps Prince Harry might want to apply for lessons as he and his harridan handler wife could learn an awful lot from such. In addition, maybe it’s time for Lady May to get in on another “money sluice;” maybe, just maybe she out to go into business with Ms Moore also.

     

    Editor’s Note – Unlike as is the case in many publications, this article was NOT sponsored or supported by a third-party.

     

    Pictured Top – The Right Honourable Lady May MP is quite happy to take Saudi wonga (and honours and millions more elsewhere) in spite of her £85,000 parliamentary salary and expense allowance; he who wanted to be “private” Prince Harry is quite happy to take millions in wonga from Netflix, Penguin Random House and Spotfiy (amongst others) to spill his guts whilst denigrating the reputations of his stepmother and his very own brother.

     

    This morning on Twitter, Matthew Steeples asked: “Is Westminster using #HarryTheInterview as a way to ‘bury bad news’ (Jo Moore 9/11 style) about MPs outside earnings?” and accompanied his poll with the hashtags: “#PrinceHarry #MeghanMarkle #Harryhasgonemad #RoyalFamily #RoyalScandal  #TheresaMay #DavidLammy #politics #MPs #power #mondaythoughts #MondayMorning #BuryBadNews”
    Theresa May 2021 earnings
    Duke and Duchess of Sussex Spotify Penguin Netflix money
    This morning on Twitter, Matthew Steeples also asked: “In wake of #HarryTheInterview with Tom Bradby last night, what’s your view of how Prince Harry comes out in the wash?” The overwhelming response thus far (76.4% as of 10am, 9th January 2022) has been: “A mangled mucked up mess.”

    Twitter reacts to Tom Bradby’s toady interview…

    The British public were shocked and stunned undoubtedly last night as they watched the Duke of Sussex bang on about everyone but himself being to blame for his predicament to his mate Tom Bradby on ITV1 last night.

     

    Whilst the majority who reacted on Twitter were outraged, a few of his PR peddling fanatics and others did offer supportive words and encouragement.

     

    A selection of the missives shared follows:

     

  • Where’s Gary Glitter? Rumours Circulate That Evil Paedophile Is Moving To Margate

    Where’s Gary Glitter? Rumours Circulate That Evil Paedophile Is Moving To Margate

    WORLD EXCLUSIVE – Residents of Margate, Kent furious that evil paedophile Gary Glitter is AGAIN attempting to move to their seaside town as the “sick bastard’s” imminent release in early 2023 is announced

    Gary Glitter – born Paul Gadd in Banbury, Oxfordshire in May 1944 – is a monster, a maniac and a manipulator. The I’m the Leader of the Gang (I Am) crooner is an evil-to-his-rotten-core paedophile who has been convicted on multiple occasions and in 2009, former Home Secretary and ex-Maidstone and Weald, Kent MP Ann Widdecombe even appeared on a Channel 4 tellybox show titled The Execution of Gary Glitter about him.

     

    At the time, human death penalty supporting but “animal loving” Miss Widdecombe bizarrely claimed she didn’t know she what the programme she was even appearing in. She later told the Kent Messenger: “I didn’t know I was in it… I don’t have anything personal against Gary Glitter.” Going further, however, she added there was a “moral case for” the death penalty,” claimed “it acts as a deterrent” yet tempered: “I don’t have a view on whether he [Glitter] should have been executed.”

     

    Now, it has emerged that in spite of just serving 7 years of a 16-year sentence given in 2015, it seems the 78-year-old onetime ‘glam rocker’ could be about to get out of jail in early 2023 and it is said he could be moving to Margate in Kent – a town better known for its connections to artists Tracey Emin and J. M. W. Turner.

     

    “Why Margate?” we hear you ask. Aside from in November 2008, the Kent Messenger claiming: “Is Glitter living in Kent?” to be the “hottest rumour around” and him having previously registered as wanting to use Ashford International Stadium, Kent as part of his “travel applications,” it now seems Margate residents seem to suspect this evil cretin could be soon lurking like a leech amongst their midst. He is tellingly said to have “familial connections to the area.”

     

    Glitter previously featured, on a prior gap between his many, many jail stints in Britain and beyond, in a video allegedly made in Margate last in August 2008. In the very short 0:18-second clip supposedly filmed in the town, the “paedophile tw*t” was asked if he was “coming back to England” and then he ran away. The video is available to view below whilst in February 2009, one member of the Mumsnet social network got very upset that they’d “just discovered Gary Glitter [might have been] living less than a mile away from [their] son’s school in Margate.”

     

    Ms Jenkins later continued: “He is definitely in Margate. Loads of people have seen him in and around there since before Christmas. Apparently, the local cab firms won’t pick him up.”

     

    This particular lady, going by the name of Lottie Jenkins, at the time, remarked: “I know he is being monitored… But it’s the thought that he is so close… People keep telling me [he] has to live somewhere. Can’t they find some far flung island to put him on?”

     

    On Sunday, a local resident, speaking to The Steeple Times on condition of anonymity about what they knew about this very inappropriately titled Do You Wanna Touch Me singer-songwriter possibly relocating to this seaside resort, raged:

     

    “It is disgusting that this filthy creature might be allowed to live in the proximity of adults let alone children in a built-up urban area where there are many young families.”

     

    “I’ve had it on good authority that the sick bastard Glitter has been allowed out on day release trips and as part of his preparation for freedom, Margate has been placed on the agenda as being somewhere he could live. I was even told he visited recently to have a gander.”

     

    “As a grandmother, I’m furious and I want answers. I know he’s got to live somewhere, but we just don’t want filth here and I can assure you, mark my words, there’ll be hell to pay if he does turn up in any local shop, café, bar or restaurant.”

     

    At the weekend, Sam Merriman and Simon Parry for The Mail on Sunday further observed of Glitter’s likely 2023 release:

     

    “Sex offenders released from prison are closely monitored by both the police and the Probation Service and may be recalled to jail if they breach their strict licence conditions.”

     

    His Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service were contacted at their Clive House, 60 Petty France, London headquarters for comment on Monday by The Steeple Times but declined to comment. A representative remarked: “We cannot discuss individual cases” before curtly hanging up; they most definitely didn’t, however, add: Hello, Hello, [Call] Back Again.

     

    Editor’s Note – Unlike as is the case in many publications, this article was NOT sponsored or supported by a third-party.

     

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sR7q1o_6kQA
    In August 2008, in a video shared on YouTube, Paul Gadd was filmed in Margate allegedly thus linking him to the Kent resort best known otherwise for Emin and Turner.
    The Execution Channel 4 Ann Widdecombe
    In November 2009, wacky-not-wonderful weirdo The Right Honourable Ann Widdecombe DSG claimed she didn’t know she would be appearing in a fictional drama titled ‘The Execution of Garry Glitter’ when she agreed to participate in it. Speaking to the ‘Kent Messenger’ later, she ludicrously lamented: “I didn’t even know I was in it. At the time I knew merely that they were putting on a drama that suggested the home secretary had reinstated the death penalty, and that at the end the home secretary would have doubts. They said at a later stage they might use it in relation to a specific case. They wanted to do the interview and I agreed to do it. I don’t have anything personal against Gary Glitter.”
    Jim Davidson
    In June 2021, ‘The Steeple Times’ reported that the washed-up wazzock Jim Davidson – a ‘5×3’ given his having had 5 kids by 3 of his 5 wives – had come out as a supporter of Gary Glitter (born Paul Gadd) and commented: “I spoke to Paul when I visited The Verne [prison] two years. He’s remorseful and he looked ready to start a new life.” Davidson was subsequently condemned as a “Nonce Defender.”
    Fred and Rosemary West
    Jimmy Savile
    With friends like these… Pictured with a random woman and a nasty, vomit yellow coloured jumper wearing Sir Jimmy Savile. They do say ‘paedos of a feather doth flock together.’
    Cliff Richard
    With friends like these… Pictured with creepy Christian crooner Sir Cliff Richard, the ‘Another Rock and Roll Christmas’ singer looking (un)extraordinarily off his freakish face.
    Children in Need Pudsey Bear
    In January 1990, Gary Glitter – pictured here with a BBC ‘Children In Need’ Pudsey Bear – was interviewed by the ‘Smash Hits’ turned ‘Q Magazine’ journalist Tom Hibbert. Quoting from his regular: “Who the Hell Does _____ Think He Is?” feature, ‘The Rebel Magazine’ shared in October 2012: “’Cor! It was raunchy on the road, aw haw. It was very good. I used to take my pick of the girls, you know. I remember Helsinki, looking out the hotel window and there was 4,000 girls waiting – at least 4,000 because I was counting, I was standing there on the balcony and I’d get the binoculars and I was saying. Send me up that one. I’ll have that one. And that one. It was that easy.’ Hibbert asks him if he’d rather be trying to make the world a better place. Does he ever wish he went into politics? Glitter: ‘But I am political. I do it subliminally! Cor! There’s a long word I never used before… I do it subliminally and I think I’m pretty powerful, mean, some of my dinner parties, some of the gang go out and do all the talking and I’m the funny little Buddha sitting in the corner.’ Tom Hibbert: ‘What are you talking about?’ Glitter: ‘I have power. I’m the leader of the gang. I am power. Power with love, love rock ‘n’ roll and power, power to… you know? Do you know what I’m saying? That’s what I’m talking about.’” With the benefit of hindsight, one can ask why Paul Gadd wasn’t immediately arrested. Shame on the Metropolitan Police.
    Tessa Dahl
    When he appeared on ‘This is Your Life’ in 1992 with children’s author Roald Dahl’s daughter Tessa, she remarked on how “schoolgirls paid £5 to gaze at him.” Talk about sickening. The ‘Daily Mail’ later reported: “The singer fidgets in his seat, loosens his scarf and puts a finger to his lips in a bid to silence Miss Dahl, who is also an author. Speaking to host Michael Aspel, she says: ‘My sister Lucy turned it into quite a successful venture. She used to pack the train full of adolescent school friends in school uniform and they’d skive school. She would bring them to the house and would charge them £5 a head to come and gaze at the Glitter.’ Addressing Glitter, Miss Dahl – the mother of model and TV presenter Sophie – added: ‘The house actually turned into a sort of Gary Glitter fan club outpost, which you quite liked.’ Glitter, who had already committed several sexual offences at that point, laughs nervously. Glitter’s paedophilia was exposed when he took his computer containing 4,000 images of child abuse to be fixed at PC World in Bristol in 1997. The Dahl family had no knowledge of his crimes.”
    Piers Morgan
    And finally… Poor Piers Morgan – a man who seems to be like a magnet for such fiends… He’s also been pictured with other paedophile, nonce sex offenders including Max Clifford, Ghislaine Maxwell, Rolf Harris and Harvey Weinstein.
  • Marlene, Marlene… Ngozi Fulani (Born ‘Marlene Headley’) – The Gruesome Grifter of 2022

    Marlene, Marlene… Ngozi Fulani (Born ‘Marlene Headley’) – The Gruesome Grifter of 2022

    As ‘Harry & Meghan’ premieres on Netflix, a video of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s supporter Marlene Headley (AKA ‘Negozi Fulani’) proves her to be nothing but an attention seeking grifter

    On the day that Netflix’s ‘moanathon’ Harry & Meghan ‘drops’ millennial style, a video of that “grifter that’s gotta grift” Ngozi Fulani – whose name at birth was actually Marlene Headley – is also doing the rounds. In it, noxious nuisance Ms Headley, as many are now referencing this toxic troublemaker, is shown parading around blatantly telling people how she has to dress up to get noticed.

     

    Clearly illustrating herself as someone prepared to act up in order to get any kind of attention at all, here again is proof that the entire debacle with Lady Susan Hussey was orchestrated and planned in a very twisted fashion. It was anything but a chance encounter on the part of Headley – a woman who previously effectively suggested our now Queen Consort, Camilla, to be someone who inflicted “domestic abuse” against the mendacious menace formerly known as Meghan Markle – and the victim in all this, it is becoming more and more apparent, was actually an 83-year-old who had served her nation diligently for over 60 years.

     

    Yesterday, GB News reported that Ms Headley had issued a further statement about an incident she’d previously claimed she didn’t want to make a fuss about. On Monday, she supposedly ludicrously opined:

     

    “What took place at the event is now well-documented, and sadly is something that occurs on an all too regular basis… I have experienced first-hand what happens when a black woman faces adversity and has to overcome additional barriers when trying to report it… I remain dedicated to raising awareness around cultural competency, and will go to Buckingham Palace, or anywhere else, if it will help raise positive change and save lives.”

     

    Meanwhile elsewhere in the Daily Mail’s ‘Ephraim Hardcastle’ column this morning, reference was made to one half of the Duchess of Sussex’s supplier of private jets, Sir Elton John. It was noted:

     

    “With Sir Elton John confirmed to headline Glastonbury, Prince Philip’s biographer Gyles Brandreth recalls sitting with the duke before a performance by the Rocket Man.”

     

    “‘Looking at the programme,’ says Gyles, ‘Philip groaned, ‘Oh God, Elton John… again.’”

     

    Sadly, still titleless David Furnish, Sir Elton’s other half and ‘close friend’ of Danny Williams, didn’t get a look-in and yet again the late Duke of Edinburgh was proven to be a far wiser sort than his drippy grandson in his observations on good and bad character.

     

    Editor’s Note – Unlike as is the case in many publications, this article was NOT sponsored or supported by a third-party.

     

    Pictured Top (left to right) – Ngozi Fulani explaining how she dresses up to get attention in a video clip shared on TikTok; Prince Harry with his supplier of private jets Sir Elton John and hubby David Furnish; Lady Susan Hussey showing herself to actually be anything but a racist and the Duchess of Sussex called out for what she actually is: “The meanest girl in the world!”

     

    Ngozi Fulani Marlene Headley Queen Camilla
    Ngozi Fulani has repeatedly banged on about how she didn’t like Lady Susan Hussey having touched her during their encounter; the hypocrite, shown here behind Queen Consort Camilla at the very reception where that encounter occurred, is pictured touching somebody else and up close and personal with another. Here is somebody who has turned a storm in a teacup into almighty PR opportunity for nobody but her nasty self.
    Elton John David Furnish Duke and Duchess of Sussex
    The ‘Daily Mail’ had a pop at Sir Elton John on the day of his friend Prince Harry’s Netflix premiere. In mentioning that Prince Philip was anything but a fan of titleless David Furnish’s hubby, they pointedly showed the late Duke of Edinburgh to be a far better judge of character than his soppy grandson.
    David Furnish Danny Williams Meghan Markle Duchess of Sussex
    When he’s not paddling around whilst holidaying in the land of olive oil, David Furnish (pictured here with the male ‘friend’ he bought a flat for, Danny Williams) likes to make programmes to air on Netflix with his female chum the Duchess of Sussex. The programmes, unsurprisingly, just like this dastardly duo themselves, don’t prove to be very popular.
    Curtains for Meghan Markle
    Today, with their Netflix premiere, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex have signaled what should be next for them. This greedy, grasping, grubbing duo should be told: “It’s curtains for you!” by King Charles and then they should be sent off to where they belong: Siberia.

    Twitter reacts to Ngozi Fulani’s ongoing publicity stunt at the expense of an 83-year-old pensioner…

  • Moron of the Moment 2022 – Deranged, Delusional Dimwit Darren Grimes Launches New ‘Voice of Britain’ Channel

    Moron of the Moment 2022 – Deranged, Delusional Dimwit Darren Grimes Launches New ‘Voice of Britain’ Channel

    As deranged dimwit Darren Grimes announces he’s launching a new channel called ‘Voice of Britain,’ this tedious twerp rightly gets labelled “the voice of a very small racist minority”

    “I’ve just put the heating on. Feels naughty, a bit decadent. Like buying Lurpak instead of Aldi’s own brand” tattled sacked from GB News ‘presenter’ Darren Grimes this morning.

     

    ‘Grim Grimes’ or ‘Gobby Grimes’ – whose other nicknames number ‘Crafty W*nk’ (the less said about the alleged episode that led to that, the better) – was fresh from having announced he’s “taking on the media” at the weekend and will be launching a new channel which he seems to be calling the ‘Voice of Britain.’

     

    No doubt, with the press quivering in their boots at the prospect of this mouthy moron took to YouTube at the weekend and in a 3:20-minute diatribe declared:

     

    “Throughout my life I’ve been told things can’t be done, that I should know my place and that someone from a working class, County Durham background shouldn’t be getting ideas above their station by seeking to influence British politics.”

     

    Whilst he is undoubtedly right that his “influence” amounts to zilch-zero-nothing, Grimes continued:

     

    “I’m told that because I voted and campaigned for Brexit, like millions of you, 17.4 million of you to be precise, you must be an uneducated, chippy little oik for having done so.”

     

    He was most certainly correct in his latter assessment, but then he had to play victim and after showing a clip from Channel 4 News where he was deservedly berated, he played victim next and added:

     

    “I think the sneering, calling me ‘unintelligent’ is absolutely why [Remain] lost this campaign. Your arrogance and your snobbishness is disgusting and that is why you lost.”

     

    “I experienced that to such an extent that the establishment class in this country threw the total weight of the state against me for having the audacity to campaign for leave.”

     

    “I faced bankruptcy in my early twenties, but thanks to kind quiet patriots, I managed to crowdfund and fight back. I won against a biased Electoral Commission that had stacked itself against our vote for British independence.”

     

    “I then faced off the Metropolitan Police when I was threatened with arrest for daring to air an interview with the historian Dr David Starkey on the Marxist outfit Black Lives Matter.”

     

    “Alongside the Free Speech Union, I fought against this attempt to silence online speech and online debate and that fight is one that continues.”

     

    “But now, I really am facing a ‘Darren Versus Goliath’ struggle in this next challenge that I want to bring about. I want to take on the established media in this country; a media class that thinks that anyone that voted Brexit is racist, that anyone concerned about the migrant crisis running rampant at the British border is xenophobic or anyone that who believes in biological is a swivel eyed transphobe.”

     

    Laughably, this deranged dunce then raged:

     

    “I want to be the voice of common sense, the voice of the silent majority, decent, hardworking people, patriotic people and thoroughly fed-up people I think it’s safe to say, thoroughly fed-up men and women like you that have had enough of being hectored and spoken down to by our political class for their views.”

     

    “I want to use my channel and my platform, my voice, to speak up for you, to champion the issues that you care about in real Britain, to say the things that need to be said, to hear the views that need to be heard and to refuse to kowtow to mobs on Twitter and elsewhere; the ‘cancel culture vultures.’”

     

    Elevating his never-sorry-self definitely far-above his station, Grimes concluded:


    “In short, I want to be Britain’s voice and you can support me in this latest venture by subscribing to my channel, by subscribing, by sharing and liking content you enjoy and by supporting this independent journalism with as little as the price of a cup of coffee because always, from the bottom of my heart, many of you have been with us on this journey for years now.”

     

    “I want to thank you once again for hopefully joining us on this next chapter because boy, oh boy, I cannot wait to get started.”

     

    Pictured Top (left to right) – A suitably “milk bottle white” – like his monosyllabic mate Michael Heaver – Darren Grimes harassing a camel in Dubai in ill-fitting swimwear with a caption of “coming soon” above him and a person of colour seemingly on his arm; sporting one white and one black shoe ‘Diane Abbott-style’ at Newcastle Football Club and trying to appeal to the masses with a pint of Heineken.

     

    Editor’s Note – Unlike as is the case in many publications, this article was NOT sponsored or supported by a third-party.

     

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=5&v=n0yEQPQnyx0
    The reasoning for Darren Grimes’s best-known nickname explained.
    Voice of Reason 2
    Voice of Reason 3