The Steeple Times

Category: Duchess of Sussex

  • Taxi For ‘Has-Been’ – The “Catastrophic” Crap Of Prince Harry

    Taxi For ‘Has-Been’ – The “Catastrophic” Crap Of Prince Harry

    After ‘Has-Been’ Prince Harry nonsensically claimed he was pursued for TWO HOURS by paparazzi, all he has proven is that he’s nothing but a whining whingebag

    “When you’re in the middle of a near catastrophic car chase wouldn’t you put on your seat belt?” quite rightly enquired the spoof Twitter account Audrey fforbes-Hamilton on Wednesday evening of Prince Harry’s allegations that paparazzi pursued him, his wife and his mother-in-law in New York for two hours on Tuesday.

     

    After having put in an appearance at the astoundingly overpriced £795,000 ($1 million, €915,000 or درهم3.7 million) for two tables Ms. Foundation for Women awards dinner at the Ziegfeld Ballroom at 141 West 54th Street – where the mendacious menace formerly known as Meghan Markle laughably received a ‘Woman of Vision award in spite of clearly being totally lacking in ‘vision’ of anything other than power and privilege – the trio claim to have been involved in a two hour “near catastrophic” car chase around Manhattan.

     

    An unnamed spokesperson for ‘Walmart Wallis’ and her dopey drip ‘Has-Been’ hubby subsequently whined:

     

    “[On Tuesday[ night, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex and [Doria] Ragland were involved in a near catastrophic car chase at the hands of a ring of highly aggressive paparazzi.”

     

    “This relentless pursuit, lasting over two hours, resulted in multiple near collisions involving other drivers on the road, pedestrians and two NYPD officers.”

     

    “While being a public figure comes with a level of interest from the public, it should never come at the cost of anyone’s safety.”

     

    “Dissemination of these images, given the ways in which they were obtained, encourages a highly intrusive practice that is dangerous to all in involved.”

     

    However, according to The Sun: “Cabbie Sukhcharn Singh, who picked up the Sussexes and Meghan’s mum Doria Ragland, said they ‘obviously didn’t grow up in New York.’ He added: ‘I think that’s all, you know, exaggerated. I don’t think I’d call it a chase.’”

     

    Going further the paper added: “A high-ranking NYPD insider said the chase ‘definitely wasn’t two hours,’ adding its escort had around 20 minutes of interaction with Meghan and Harry’s convoy.”

     

    Speaking to The Guardian, Julian Phillips, NYPD deputy commissioner for public information, observed:

     

    “The NYPD assisted the private security team protecting the Duke and Duchess of Sussex. There were numerous photographers that made their transport challenging. The Duke and Duchess of Sussex arrived at their destination and there were no reported collisions, summonses, injuries, or arrests in regard.”

     

    Tellingly: “Buckingham Palace has declined to comment on the reports,” but, naturally, the meddling mouthpiece Omid Scobie had to get his plastic-not-fantastic face onto the screens to spout salaciously about the non-incident. Speaking to the BBC’s Newsnight – a show that should know better than to bring on this tittle-tattling twerp – the one-time ‘bestie’ of the not-so-glamorous glamour model Jodie Marsh whinged:

     

    “It is impossible not to think of Princess Diana when we hear about car accidents and this kind of aggressive paparazzi chase and so, I was really surprised to hear from sources that not one member of the royal family – including King Charles and Prince William, who are obviously heavily affected by Princess Diana’s death – had not reached out to Prince Harry hours after this news had broken.”

     

    “You know, it was sort of on every single headline around the world. Sadly, that shows the kind of disrepair that that relationship is. It is hard not to forget that Harry was here just a couple of weeks ago for King Charles’s coronation.”

     

    “You would have thought that that may go towards building some kind of path towards reconciliation in some way, but it seems like that’s not felt on the other side and that would no doubt of been a sort of disappointing addition to what had already been a traumatic 12 hours for the couple.”

     

    It is now time for just one further development; it is time for ‘MeGain’ and ‘Has-Been’ to take a taxi to Siberia.

     

    Editor’s Note – Unlike as is the case in many publications, this article was NOT sponsored or supported by a third-party. Follow Matthew Steeples on Twitter at @M_Steeples.

     

    This morning on Twitter, Matthew Steeples asked: “Do you believe claims of dopey drip Prince Harry & his mendacious menace wife, the wicked wench formerly known as Meghan Markle, that they spent TWO HOURS being chased around NYC by paparazzi?” By 11:30am on Friday 19th May 2023, the majority of respondents favoured the answer: “No; exaggerated nonsense.”
    On ‘Newsnight’ PR peddling pillock Omid Scobie whined: “It is impossible not to think of Princess Diana when we hear about car accidents and this kind of aggressive paparazzi chase and so, I was really surprised to hear from sources that not one member of the royal family – including King Charles and Prince William, who are obviously heavily affected by Princess Diana’s death – had not reached out to Prince Harry hours after this news had broken. You know, it was sort of on every single headline around the world. Sadly, that shows the kind of disrepair that that relationship is. It is hard not to forget that Harry was here just a couple of weeks ago for King Charles’s coronation. You would have thought that that may go towards building some kind of path towards reconciliation in some way, but it seems like that’s not felt on the other side and that would no doubt of been a sort of disappointing addition to what had already been a traumatic 12 hours for the couple.
    Omid Scobie Newsnight
    Omid Scobie being sent on a media circuit gadabout to bang on about the non-event is further proof that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex have well and truly lost the plot. This couple would do well to belt up, wrap up and shut up, but sadly they simply won’t.
    Twitter Berk Prince Harry Matthew Steeples
    On Friday morning, Matthew Steeples observed on Twitter: “Prince Harry is a brain dead berk. Period.” Hundreds of people liked and shared the tweet and thus provided indication of how the public view the Duke and Duchess of Sussex as now nothing but a laughing stock and in the league of the late Duke and Duchess of Windsor; here is a couple who frankly would do better just to give up. Equally, the former Meghan Markle’s decision to accept an award has rightly been called out. Royals should GIVE OUT awards, they SHOULD NOT accept them. Here is another example of the duo’s attitude of “rights over responsibilities” shining through. Shame on the pair of rotten toerags.
    Map of Prince Harry New York chase
    An annotated map, courtesy of a ‘Daily Mail’ report, shows the route the couple took. It proves that their claim of the incident lasting two hours is total twaddle. This ‘storm-in-a-teacup’ is nothing but just that. In attempting to play the Diana, Princess of Wales accident card, all the Duke and Duchess of Sussex have achieved is to make utter fools of themselves. They should be reminded: “When you are in a hole, it is best to stop digging.”

    What’s the truth about the many ‘curious stories’ that abound about the Duchess of Sussex?

    • In November 2021, the duchess was forced to apologise to the Appeal Court in London for making a misleading statement in her privacy case against The Mail on Sunday’s publishers.
    • Her very own father, Thomas, has called out her many untruths about him and others again, again and again.
    • Of her claiming having got married the day before she actually did, Mr Markle stated: “Lying about the archbishop? How can you say: ‘We’ve been married three days before we got married’? Her lies are so obvious, I don’t know why she says them.”
    • Her very own half-sister, Samantha Markle, who is currently bringing a defamation case against her, has called her out as a liar on multiple occasions also. It has been proven that the duchess’s claim that she hasn’t seen her sibling in over 20 years was untrue given a photo of the pair together 14 years ago proves quite to the contrary.
    • Her very own half-brother, Thomas Jr., said of her: “I told Prince Harry, I think she’s going to ruin your life. She’s very shallow… She’s a phony, a bully, a jaded, shallow, conceited woman.”
    • The wife of Prince Harry has been called out on multiple occasions for spinning stories against other members of the royal family, most especially the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge and Queen Camilla.
    • Staff who’ve worked for her have complained that she is a bully and investigations into this remain ongoing.
    • The Duchess of Sussex is a known manipulator of the press and paparazzis and it has been claimed that she’ll “twist the truth” to get any headline she wants.
    • Questions remain as to how many times she’s actually been married in total. Some say twice, some say thrice.
    • What’s the truth about Meghan’s mother Doria Ragland? Is this clearly equally manipulative woman an honest and decent citizen or is she a jailbird who has spent time in the clink?
    • Did the ‘Montecito Meddler’ meet Prince Andrew or Prince Harry first? Rumours abound that she could have spent time and holidayed with the former as long ago as 2001 and that her claim to have no prior knowledge of the royal family until 2016 is just utter baloney.
    • “Would you trust this woman with a bargepole?” is something often asked of this money motivated minx.

     

  • “Troubling Factual Inconsistencies” – The Trouble With Prince Harry Exposed

    “Troubling Factual Inconsistencies” – The Trouble With Prince Harry Exposed

    Today we salute Ephraim Hardcastle for hitting the nail bang on the head in referencing Prince Harry’s “troubling factual inconsistencies” in just two sentences

    A throwaway couple of sentences in this morning’s Ephraim Hardcastle column in the Daily Mail was actually truly one of the most telling analyses of the truth of the court case brought by Prince Harry against the publishers News Group Newspapers.

     

    The two sentences – featured in a column by “The Mail’s acerbic diarist, with all the most wicked gossip that the stars don’t want you to know…” – read:

     

    “The judge in Harry’s privacy case says there are ‘troubling factual inconsistencies’ in his evidence for claims dating back decades.”

     

    “Could this be explained by revelations in Spare that in the past he’s been on the wacky baccy and his memory might be a bit, er, foggy?”

     

    Editor’s Note – Unlike as is the case in many publications, this article was NOT sponsored or supported by a third-party. Follow Matthew Steeples on Twitter at @M_Steeples.

     

    Today on Twitter, Matthew Steeples asked: “Are the ‘troubling factual inconsistencies’ enough to derail Prince Harry’s court case against News Group Newspapers?” By 12.30pm on Saturday 29th April 2023, over 75% of respondents answered: “Yes; definitely, finished.”
    Ephraim Hardcastle
    The Duke of Sussex has joined up with the titleless and frankly as dull as dishwater husband of Sir Elton John, Mr David Furnish, to take on News Group Newspapers. He was deservedly mocked in this morning’s ‘Daily Mail’ but sadly they failed to mention fellow beyond boring litigants including Hugh Grant and Sadie Frost.
    Sir-Elton-John-David-Furnish-Duke-and-Duchess-of-Sussex
    Sir Elton John and his titleless husband – whom, if you’d believe his April 2016 whining to the ‘Daily Mail’s’ Sebastian Shakespeare, would like to be called ‘Lady John’ – like to spend as much time as possible with Prince Charles’ second son and his avaricious wife. The non-working royals like to sponge off the very, very, very rich popstar and his hubby and, let’s be honest, they wouldn’t be clinging to their coattails if they the 75-year-old old geezer and his 16-year-younger sidekick were living in a council house in Peckham.
  • Birdbrained Bore Bouzy Bombs – Noxious Nitwit Meghan Markle Super-Fan Christopher Bouzy Faces Trouble In 2 Court Cases

    Birdbrained Bore Bouzy Bombs – Noxious Nitwit Meghan Markle Super-Fan Christopher Bouzy Faces Trouble In 2 Court Cases

    Birdbrained Bot Sentinel bore Christopher Bouzy faces further trouble as he’s dragged deeper into two court cases concerning his definitely dubious puppet mistress Meghan Markle

    Bullying braggart Christopher Bouzy is someone you could only wish upon your worst enemy. Here is a bombastic bore whose attempts to persuade the world that his ‘statistics’ are anything other than what they truly are – and that is they are just a load of old rot – can only be surmised as an utterly tedious joke.

     

    The work of birdbrained Bouzy’s ‘organisation’ Bot Sentinel – which nonsensically claims to be all about “helping fight disinformation and targeted harassment” through “tracking” and “classifying” Twitter accounts – has long been called out as complete Barry Bull. This firm’s creepy campaign against the much-loved Welsh warbler Sadie Quinlan (AKA ‘Yankee Wally’) was beyond appalling, but now this nasty piece of toerag is facing personal trouble and strife with not just one, but two court cases involving his antagonistic antics moving forward.

     

    Fresh from his Netflix appearance peddling piffle for the Prince Harry and the woman formerly known as Meghan Markle in the docuseries Harry & Meghan in December last year, moronic mouthpiece Bouzy is being dragged deeper into two legal cases. The first is an action brought by Samantha Markle against her estranged half-sister the Duchess of Sussex whilst the second is an action brought against him personally by the attorney and commentator Nathaniel J. Broughty (better known as ‘Nate The Lawyer’ to his 280,000 YouTube followers).

     

    “It’s about hatred, it’s about race” whined blubbering Bouzy as he defended ‘MeGain’ and her drippy husband in the Netflix documentary which he no doubt got paid rather handsomely to appear in, but in both upcoming court cases he’ll find himself deservedly accused of being the orchestrator of exactly such himself.

     

    In the defamation case of Markle v Markle in Florida, Bouzy will be called as a witness and required to give a deposition alongside not only the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, but also Thomas Markle, Samantha Markle’s daughter Ashleigh Hale and the former royal aide Jason Knauf.

     

    Of the case, in March 2022, Thomas Markle remarked: “I’ve been trying for almost four years to get to see my daughter and her ginger husband in a courtroom face to face… I’d be thrilled to come to court and talk and defend my oldest daughter… There are so many obvious, obvious lies that are immediately challenged that I can’t imagine Meghan even going into the court with this… She can’t defend the things she said.”

     

    In the case of Broughty v Bouzy, in documents submitted to the United States District Court District of New Jersey on 6th February, Bouzy is described as having “no reputation to protect and little to lose by defaming a man who does.” Going further, the plaintiff argued:

     

    “Bouzy is a social media personality best known for a series of dubious online adventures—from crypto scams to phony software pitches… There is ample proof that Bot Sentinel’s social credit scores are the products, not of the rigorous algorithm Bouzy claims for them, but of views and people Bouzy does and does not like.”

     

    “Bouzy thus thrusts aside Bot Sentinel’s flimsy curtain and, in a turn whose irony was lost on no one but himself, proceeded to give the Internet a free master class on nasty, personal and racially-infused Internet trolling aimed at Mr. Broughty. From accusations of race treason – despite the fact that both he and Mr. Broughty are African Americans with a liberal political bent – to cruel mockery of Mr. Broughty’s humble origins as the child of a drug addict, and finally through a series of false and defamatory attacks on Mr. Broughty, Bouzy showed everyone exactly what social media toxicity is all about.”

     

    “Admitting that his campaign against Mr. Broughty was intended to destroy his reputation, credibility and career, Bouzy started with what must have seemed the definitive coup de main. Bouzy announced on Twitter that his own intrepid research had uncovered the fact that the famous YouTuber ‘Nate the Lawyer,’ whose livelihood depends on his identity as a lawyer, was no lawyer at all. Twitter users quickly demonstrated, however, that only a bit of competent investigation established that Mr. Broughty is in fact a member of the New York bar.”

     

    “Instead of admitting to negligence or incompetence, however, Bouzy publicly stated that, of course, he knew all along that Mr. Broughty was a lawyer, but said that he had purposely lied when he claimed otherwise.”

     

    “Emboldened by his ability to seemingly ‘get away’ with saying whatever he thought would harm Mr. Broughty, Bouzy then published a series of even more ‘damning,’ but also false and defamatory tweets. Bouzy took to Twitter and made the scandalous and fantastic claim that Mr. Broughty had, during his career as a cop, planted and falsified evidence on criminal drug suspects. Bouzy knew that promulgating this lie would render Bouzy [editor’s note: Ought to read “Broughty,” a mistake in legal document] unreliable as a source of criminal law and social commentary on YouTube.”

     

    “It was a lie, however, and Mr. Broughty immediately demanded its retraction. But Bouzy has never been held accountable in his decades of lying on the Internet, and was not about to start now. He did not merely refuse to retract these false claims; he dared Mr. Broughty to sue him for defamation. Mr. Broughty’s hand was forced.”

     

    Editor’s Note – Unlike as is the case in many publications, this article was NOT sponsored or supported by a third-party. Follow Matthew Steeples on Twitter at @M_Steeples.

     

    Follow and support Samantha Markle on Twitter at @_SammyMarkle.

     

    Follow and support Nate Broughty on Twitter at @NatetheLawyer and back his GoFundMe fundraiser by clicking here.

     

    Pictured Top – The Bot Sentinel and Spoutible founder (left) and Samantha Markle with her now estranged sister in happier times (right).

     

    Duke and Duchess of Sussex
    The Duke and Duchess of Sussex went to America to seek “privacy,” yet all they’ve done since is seek out publicity. Be it through Netflix, Spotify or ‘Spare,’ this couple have well and truly tripped themselves up and as much as their PR peddling supporters – such as Omid Scobie and Christopher Bouzy – try, they face simply becoming more and more unpopular on both sides of the pond.
    Christopher Bouzy Nathaniel Broughty
    The war of words between the bombastic Bot Sentinel bore Christopher Bouzy and ‘Nate The Lawyer’ Nathaniel Broughty looks set to intensify in the coming months.
    Tweet 1
    ‘Nate The Lawyer’ claimed earlier this week that Bouzy wanted to settle with him.
    Tweet 2
    Bouzy fired back with further defamatory tweets about his opponent ‘Nate The Lawyer’ by remarking: “I beg no one, especially an unemployed YouTube troll thirsty for relevance. I am not interested in settling. Now run along and go make your 30th YouTube video about so my name can feed your family.” Clearly, the bargain bucket Bot Sentinel founder has rather a self-inflated opinion of his own ‘value.’
  • Senseless Scobie Slammed – Disgraceful PR Peddler Omid Scobie’s Bullsh*t Called Out

    Senseless Scobie Slammed – Disgraceful PR Peddler Omid Scobie’s Bullsh*t Called Out

    As respected BBC News and Sky News journalist Simon McCoy slams the “hypocrisy” of Omid Scobie for “trashing” real journalists, we remind ‘MeGain’s Mouthpiece’ that he is nothing but a pathetic PR peddler whilst the Duchess of Sussex’s very own sister Samantha Markle claims him to be “throwing out red herrings to deflect from the truth”

    Omid Scobie doesn’t like making friends in the press; actually, he doesn’t like making friends full stop. Though he attempts to pretend to be a real journalist, he’s now being called out by real journalists and yesterday respected former BBC News and Sky News newsreader Simon McCoy became the latest to slam the tittle-tattling Finding Freedom ‘author.’

     

    On Sunday, McCoy – who married the Dynasty star Emma Samms MBE in 2021 – politely tweeted: “Dear Omid, if I may. Your hypocrisy is astounding. You are no better than those of us who tried – honestly – to report on the Royal Family for years. But you apparently know better. Stop trashing those of us who have been this profession for a while. We see you.”

     

    Responding to his comments, Twitter users subsequently told McCoy: “Shout it from the rooftops” and “he’s not a reporter, he’s a paid shrill.” One claimed: “Scoobie [sic] really is the pits!” whilst another added: “He knows zilch.” Labels of “trash media” and “he’s thick” came of the Duchess of Sussex’s PR peddler also and someone going by the handle ‘Juju Bean’ surmised: “He only speaks when Markle has something to say and gives him permission to say it.”

     

    Sensibly, another account in the name of one Audrey Johnson concluded: “If @scobie titles himself as a ‘royal journalist,’ I’m the bloody Queen of Sheba. He is under some kind of illusion that the British public are stupid! We are well aware he is MM’s mouth piece, what she orders him to report he reports!!”

     

    Elsewhere, corresponding via email with The Steeple Times over the weekend further to her exclusive interviews with us last week, the mendacious menace formerly known as Meghan Markle’s very own sister, Samantha Markle, poignantly observed:

     

    “It seems Omid Scobie is in denial and throwing out red herrings to deflect from the truth and what transpired [when Meghan Markle embarked on joining the royal family].”

     

    “No one can say she didn’t know what to expect from royal life because her PR made it clear that she went through ‘duchess school.’ She knew what the expectations were, and what the protocol was.”

     

    “It was reported that she only spent 72 days total in royal duty before quitting to allegedly pursue a life in ‘Hollywood.’ Not surprisingly, she never gave up her agent and manager in Hollywood, or her citizenship.”

     

    “Could leaving have been a plan from the beginning? Omid Scobie was also noted as being a close personal friend, so perhaps he knew about it.”

     

    “I think Omid Scobie’s credibility has been called into question several times especially after he allegedly admitted that Megan lied in the Oprah interview.”

     

    “All things taken together, it seems that it’s not that they didnt accept her, but it seems more the case that she didn’t like rules, truth  and protocol, and it seems like she wanted to jump to the top of the hierarchy after only putting in 72 days of royal duty.”

     

    “Maybe what they couldn’t accept was the constant breaking of protocol, disrespect, and the lying. Who can blame them for feeling betrayed and not accepting that? But apparently Omid Scobie can’t seem to wrap his brain around the fact that betrayal and dishonesty have consequences.”

     

    Pictured top – Twitter users really dislike the ‘Finding Freedom’ author and regularly create memes of his plastic not fantastic face.

     

    Meghan Markle Omid Scobie together
    Allegations have swirled in recent months that the woman then known as Meghan Markle spent time on yachts in 2012 and in the years before. Here is a picture of her with someone alleged to be Omid Scobie in Cannes around that time. If the man in the sunglasses is genuinely the ‘Finding Freedom’ author, it is one of the only known photographs in the public domain of the pugnacious pair together. One is left asking: “If they are as close as Scobie likes to brag and boast, why do they avoid being seen in public together?”

    Twitter responds to Omid Scobie’s diatribe of drivel about what he claims to know about Prince Harry’s disgraceful diatribe of drivel that is his forthcoming tittle-tattling tome ‘Spare’…

  • Spare Us Senseless Scobie – Omid Scobie Talks Nonsense About ‘Spare’

    Spare Us Senseless Scobie – Omid Scobie Talks Nonsense About ‘Spare’

    As Omid Scobie claims that drippy Prince Harry’s ‘Spare’ will reveal “the real truth” about him and his mendacious menace wife ‘MeGain,’ we say: Please spare us

    “Unless I’m missing something, what really would be a revelation would be for Harry to admit that, all things considered, he’s led a rather cushy, privileged life and if one of the worst things that happened to him was that he was born only second in line to the throne, then he might have done better not to have taken a reported £20 million for a four-book deal – does anyone want to read Harry on leadership and wellness? – and to have sucked it up and not made such a fuss” remarked John Crace this morning in The Guardian in his ‘Digested Week’ column.

     

    Quite right in his analysis, Crace hit the nail bang on the head, yet elsewhere yesterday the House of Sussex’s always predictably toady tin-banging twerp Omid Scobie decided to claim “the media’s got it all wrong about Prince Harry’s memoir.” Doing as he was no doubt told, as he always does when the mendacious menace formerly known as Meghan Markle no doubt put in a call, this PR peddler went further and declared to his extremely limited Yahoo! News UK audience: “Here’s the real truth.”

     

    Whilst anyone with a quarter of a brain would admit that senseless Scobie wouldn’t know “truth” it gnawed him repeatedly in the arse, the Finding Freedom ‘author’ whined about the “angered reactions” to the forthcoming diatribe of drivel that is Spare and suggested the media were claiming “quelle surprise, ‘all Meghan’s doing.’”

     

    Lauding the title of the tittle-tattling tome as a “punchy choice,” the unsophisticated former Heat gossip columnist and onetime mate of glamour ‘model’ Jodie Marsh continued his arse licking and declared:

     

    “So far, only the smallest official details about the book’s 416 pages have been released by the publisher. They describe SPARE as a title written with ‘raw, unflinching honestly,’ a book that is filled with ‘insight, revelation, self-examination, and hard-won wisdom.’ I’d expect nothing less from prolific ghostwriter J. R. Moehringer, who is famous for encouraging his subjects to switch on the lights in the darkest parts of their story.”

     

    Going further and bragging that he’s allegedly already seen the finished product, Scobie added:

     

    “Among those who have already had sight of the book’s manuscript, Harry’s journey of being the spare, plus that difficult decision to change his destiny and start a new life elsewhere, serve as significant parts of the book. Filled with the prince’s trademark cheekiness, this memoir also tells a surprisingly relatable life story. Sure, its opulent royal backdrop is far beyond a world any of us will ever know, but themes explored in SPARE should resonate with readers from all backgrounds.”

     

    “For all the tabloid reports about Harry supposedly ‘trashing’ his family (spoiler alert: he doesn’t), the book actually offers a more sympathetic look at the realities of their near-impossible existence. There were also no last-minute rewrites or edits after the Queen’s death. SPARE’s manuscript was completed almost five months before the monarch’s passing, a detail that will be acknowledged in a note at the start of the book.”

     

    “Hundreds of journalists, including myself, have written versions and fragments of the duke’s story over the years. It’s a story that, as a working member of the Royal Family, he has long been unable to tell himself. Now, having created an independent life away from the confines of the royal institution, Harry finally has the chance to set often-inaccurately reported records straight. The freedom of speech. And no matter how you may feel about the man, it’s hard not to agree he should have the right to that.”

     

    Elsewhere this week, speaking exclusively to The Steeple Times, the wicked wench formerly known as Meghan Markle’s somewhat more sensible sister, Samantha, declared of Spare: “’Spare’ us all the hypocritical pity party.” She is right and this book deserves only one thing; pulping.

     

    Pictured top – Twitter users unsurprisingly loathe and detest the mouthpiece of the Duchess of Sussex and mocked his ‘Finding Freedom’ as ‘Finding French Fries’ recently.

     

    Web Summit 2023
    Attempting to move the story onto his never-sorry-self, the ‘Finding Freedom’ PR peddling pillock shared news about how he’d been on the stage at Web Summit 2023 in Lisbon. He tweeted: “This year’s @WebSummit was the first to include stages focused on media, publishing and journalism so I was excited to be invited to speak, share stories, and discuss some of the challenges our industries are facing (from cancel culture to misinformation) and how to tackle them.” It was a shame he didn’t share that he’s the queen of misinformation himself.
    Jodie Marsh and Omid Scobie
    In August 2020, the ‘Daily Mail’ shared that plastic-not-fantastic Omid previously worked at gossip magazine ‘Heat’ and partied with the ‘glamour model’ Jodie Marsh. They mentioned how somebody had “airbrushed” Meghan Markle’s “entry on the online encyclopedia Wikipedia… to include more flattering details days before her romance with Prince Harry became public” and illustrated the ‘Finding Freedom’ author’s “drastic transformation” in two very different photographs. Maniac Scobie is someone who most definitely would like his past forgotten, but here again we remind him that he’s actually just a two-faced twerp who spins nothing but nonsense.

    Twitter reacts to Scobie’s diatribe of nonsense about Prince Harry’s nonsensical ‘Spare’…

  • Mind-Blowing, Moaning, Money Motivated Meghan Markle… Or Just A Predictably Petulant Princess?

    Mind-Blowing, Moaning, Money Motivated Meghan Markle… Or Just A Predictably Petulant Princess?

    Is it that mind-blowing that the Duchess of Sussex thinks she’s helping her cause with her latest antics? Isn’t this just instead yet another predictable example of her showing her truly self-serving character?

    Deservedly condemned by Tom Bower in Revenge: Meghan, Harry and the war between the Windsors and hinted at as potentially a “yacht girl” for Prince Andrew by Kirby Sommers in July, the mendacious minx formerly known as Meghan Markle has very predictably scored multiple further own goals in recent days. Why, given her past form, anyone is surprised however is quite beyond comprehension.

     

    Aside from condescendingly comparing herself to Nelson Mandela – for which she unsurprisingly got slammed by the late South African president’s grandson Zwelivelile Mandela – the Duchess of Sussex was also called out as not having “an iota of common sense” by the New York Post’s Maureen Callahan.

     

    Going further, in an opinion piece widely saluted titled “Toddler and tiara: Meghan Markle STILL throwing tantrums about royal family,” Callahan added:

     

    “This woman has nothing to say. She has nothing to offer, no original thoughts or guiding philosophy, no earthly reason to be taking so much money from, and so much space in, the mainstream media she so clearly despises.”

     

    Summing her up as “the Greta Garbo of Montecito,” a new “Queen of All Things Sufferable” and “the Petulant Princess,” the award winning “Top 50 Power Women 2016” journalist amongst other things suggested:

     

    “I must concede her lone accomplishment here: Just when you think Meghan Markle can’t get any more delusional, she outdoes herself. Her self-regard runs in direct opposition to her waning relevance. She clearly has no real friends left — or even decent publicists… Meghan is an inveterate liar.”

     

    “What will make Meghan happy? Hell if she knows. The only solace she finds from this existential torment, it seems, is sitting for fancy photo shoots and talking to friendly journalists.”

     

    “Left to her own devices here, Meghan returns to her default mode, perseverating over the Queen’s refusal to give her and Harry everything they wanted: namely, to monetize [sic] their royal status while owing nothing in public service.”

     

    “’I think forgiveness is really important,’ Meghan says, adding that she has ‘a lot to say until I don’t. Sometimes, as they say, the silent part is still part of the song.’ Meghan Markle, two very weary nations beg you: Please. Be that silent part.”

     

    Though outrage at the conduct of the Duchess of Sussex and ultimately also her drip of a husband towards the Queen and other members of both the House of Windsor and her own birth family is understandable, this ridiculous woman is simply incapable of accepting that it is her that is at fault. It seems that ambitious and audacious ‘MeGain’ will stop at nothing to achieve her next goal – the keys to the White House.

     

    Banana
    Known for slipping on proverbial bananas – as well as writing patronising messages on them to prostitutes – the wife of Prince Charles’s second son is clearly on a path where she will create more embarrassment and bring yet more havoc to both her marital and birth families. It is an outrage that nobody urges her to see sense and teaches her to behave with a modicum of decorum and an ounce of decency.
    Here is a woman who won’t stop until she next seizes high office. It is clear that a political career is very much on the agenda of this self-obsessed ex-D-list actress.

    Can anyone solve a problem like ‘Mind-Blowing MeGain’?

    • In November 2021, the duchess was forced to apologise to the Appeal Court in London for making a misleading statement in her privacy case against The Mail on Sunday’s publishers.
    • Her very own father, Thomas, has called out her many untruths about him and others again, again and again.
    • Of her claiming having got married the day before she actually did, Mr Markle stated: “Lying about the archbishop? How can you say: ‘We’ve been married three days before we got married’? Her lies are so obvious, I don’t know why she says them.”
    • Her very own half-sister, Samantha, who is currently bringing a defamation case against her, has called her out as a liar on multiple occasions also. It has been proven that the duchess’s claim that she hasn’t seen her sibling in over 20 years was proven untrue when a photo of the pair 13 years ago emerged.
    • Her very own half-brother, Thomas Jr., said of her: “I told Prince Harry, I think she’s going to ruin your life. She’s very shallow… She’s a phony, a bully, a jaded, shallow, conceited woman.”
    • The former Meghan Markle has been called out on multiple occasions for spinning stories against other members of the royal family, most especially the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge.
    • Staff who’ve worked for her have complained that she is a bully and investigations into this remain ongoing.
    • The Duchess of Sussex is a known manipulator of the press and paparazzis and it has been claimed that she’ll “twist the truth” to get any headline she wants.
    • Questions remain as to how many times she’s actually been married in total. Some say twice, some say thrice.
    • “Would you trust this woman with a bargepole?” is something often asked of this money motivated minx.

     

    Twitter reacts to ‘MeGain’s’ latest antics…

    Tweet 5
    Tweet 3
    Tweet 2
    Tweet 1
  • Revenge – Meghan Markle v Tom Bower 2022

    Revenge – Meghan Markle v Tom Bower 2022

    Is Tom Bower’s latest tome ‘Revenge: Meghan, Harry and the war between the Windsors’ actually going to be that revealing? Will it actually pull any punches or is it just a rehash of old news?

    Dubbed on the cover of Revenge: Meghan, Harry and the war between the Windsors as “Britain’s top investigative journalist,” Tom Bower is known for his punchy unauthorised autobiographies of the likes of rambunctious rotters including Mohamed Al-Fayed, Sir Richard Branson, Boris Johnson and Robert Maxwell.

     

    Sued for libel unsuccessfully for Lord (Conrad) Black prior to his being sent down for fraud yet cooperative and seemingly very friendly with Bernie Ecclestone, “Witchfinder General of contemporary biographers” Bower’s book has – in extracts shared thus far by The Times – focused on information such as that the Queen supposedly did not want the Duchess of Sussex at her husband’s Prince Philip’s funeral and that both Prince Harry and his wife have been repeatedly “hysterical.”

     

    Hardly new ‘news’ in the sense that these “bombshell stories” have previously been repeatedly discussed online previously, such information as that “Meghan Markle ‘threw a cup of tea in the air’ and was ‘abrasive’ during [a] royal tour” is now doing the round. Of this, without naming the victim of the char chucking, Bower opines:

     

    “Meghan was allegedly abrasive towards her four female staff and even towards the local British diplomats.”

     

    “According to one report, Meghan allegedly threw a cup of tea into the air. Her anger may have been partly fuelled by Harry.”

     

    “Every night he trawled social media, searching for snide comments on the internet. Every morning he and Meghan turned on their phones to surf the Internet.”

     

    Speaking of his book to Times Radio two days ago, Bower added:

     

    “H&M have set themselves up as judge and jury of the RF. Everything they do is to provoke and undermine and to challenge. My book is not gossip and speculation because it is sourced. You can’t imagine how much I didn’t print. The sources are identified, nearly 1000 sources are listed.”

     

    “I have worked really hard to make sure it everything is accurate. There is very little in this book which is gossip and where there is, it is headlined as gossip.”

     

    “I think the reader will come away with a vision of Harry and Meghan which is very different to the one they are accustomed to so far.”

     

    Today, as self-proclaimed “global humanitarian” Prince Harry is set to give another no doubt self-serving speech at the United Nations in New York to mark Nelson Mandela Day, his wife is said to be “dreading” publication of the book in three days. Coming after her attempt to stop her half-sister suing her for defamation was unsuccessful, one, however, is left wondering whether Bower’s really will turn the screw or whether it’ll be left to another biographer to finally expose the truth about ‘Meddling MeGain’ and her drip of a husband’s ridiculous antics.

     

    Tom Bower’s Revenge: Meghan, Harry and the war between the Windsors will be released on 21st July 2022 in hardback form.

     

    In a poll this morning, editor Matthew Steeples asked if the book will be “a rip roaring romp of a read or a somewhat boring rehash of old news?”
    Times Radio turned to the subject as to whether the royal runaways are “self-destructive or successful?”
    Duke and Duchess of Sussex
    The Duchess of Sussex has been known to pull faces on occasions prior. She now may well find herself chucking more than teacups when she gets to read a book that is released on the 21st July 2022. One can imagine her temper may flare more given she won’t even be able to get her PR peddler Omid Scobie to help her spin this one.
    Lord and Lady Black
    Other subjects covered by Tom Bower previously have included the equally Marie Antoinette-like Barbara Amiel and her husband Conrad Black. Lord and Lady Black tried to stop the author. They, like ‘MeGain,’ failed.
    Sir Richard Branson grabbing
    Equally, Sir Richard Branson didn’t exactly come off brilliantly as a result of being featured in a book by Bower.
  • Markle V Markle 2022 – Samantha Markle Wants £61k+ From Sister

    Markle V Markle 2022 – Samantha Markle Wants £61k+ From Sister

    As it looks set to go to jury trial, the defamation case of Samantha Markle against her sibling the Duchess of Sussex in Markle v Markle looks set to make the ‘Wagatha Christie’ case look like a walk in the park

    The public have spent the first part of this year lapping up the ‘Wagatha Christie’ and Johnny Depp v Amber Heard defamation cases, but if it goes to plan Samantha M. Markle v Meghan Markle could become the truly most addictive legal ‘must watch’ of 2022.

     

    Pitching the prospect of the Queen’s grandson’s wife, the Duchess of Sussex, appearing against her very own half-sister in a Tampa, Florida courtroom as a drama most definitely doesn’t require anything other than gleeful gloating and if it does occur, it will, quite frankly, be the ultimate sh*tshow.

     

    Like watching a car crash, the Twitterati will no doubt be addicted. They will love the fact that the “private citizen” plaintiff, Mrs Samantha Markle, wants “in excess of £61,000 ($75,000 €71,000 or درهم275,000) exclusive of interests, costs and attorney’s fees” from her estranged ‘private when it suits’ sibling and that Prince Harry’s wife is being called out for “fake quotes against her sister.” That the pugnacious PR peddler Omid Scobie’s Finding Freedom is also being slammed as full of “false information” will be a veritable bonus.

     

    Of that trashy tittle-tattling tome, the elder sister declares in her latest amended complaint submitted earlier this month:

     

    “The book was used by the Duchess to affirm the false narrative that she portrayed to the Royal Family, that she supposedly lived a rags to riches storybook life. A life that took her from a humble beginning like that of Cinderella, to the wife of a Prince, a Duchess. She did not hesitate to strike back at what she mistakenly believed to be actions of Mrs. Markle, her older sister, against her.”

     

    “She needed to distance herself from Mrs. Markle and to blame any and all issues on her. In the book Finding Freedom, in which the Duchess provided the information through her communications secretary, there is an entire chapter 12, starting on Page 310 entitled A Problem Like Samantha which defamed Mrs. Markle and falsely describes her ‘ploys’ to gain notoriety and money from her relation to the Duchess.”

     

    “It stated as fact: ‘The trouble began with Samantha Markle. Meghan’s romance with Harry had hardly been public a full 24 hours when her half-sister sensed an opportunity. Never mind that she hadn’t seen her estranged half-sister in more than a decade. Samantha – who had changed her name from Yvonne and died her hair a fresh shade of blond…’”

     

    “The false and defamatory statements which follow not only caused harm to Mrs. Markle financially in her professional occupation as a mental health counselor, but also subjected her to incomprehensible amounts of public scrutiny causing her mental health and well-being to deteriorate.”

     

    Going further, the plaintiff calls out other supposed lies and falsehoods and claims her health and reputation have suffered immensely. She adds that the Duchess of Sussex “instilled anger in her fan base against [her]” and that this “caused substantial, irreparable prejudice, injury and harm.” She suggests that she “receives hateful emails and messages on a regular basis, is subjected to ongoing negative media portrayals, news articles, nasty negative press, and her reputation has been so damaged that she has been unable to work as a mental health counselor.”

     

    Aside from having had to “seek and obtain an ‘Injunction for Protection Against Stalking’ in Polk County, Florida against one of Defendant’s zealous fans,” here is a woman who claims to suffer “emotionally from the worldwide hatred, contempt, and ridicule that she is forced to endure” and now she’s quite rightly fighting back.

     

    If the Duchess of Sussex and her decided drip of a husband had any sense, they’d now do one thing: They’d man-up and make amends with both their families and bring them into the fold. That, however, would be too sensible, so, of course, they bloody well won’t.

     

    Pictured top – In times past, the ever so conveniently forgetful former actress was happy to pose for pictures with her the sister she is now at war with both in the courts and via the media.

     

    The ever so conveniently forgetful former actress – a woman who clearly has trouble remembering how many times and when she actually got married – was happy to not only pose for pictures with her papa and to take his money to pay for her education also.
    Actress
    The ambitious and audacious wife of Prince Harry would, however, like pictures such as this – and others far worse – erased from the Internet.
    The Duchess of Sussex truly morphed into the ‘Modern Day Mrs Simpson’ for her interview with her and Sarah, the Duchess of York’s crony Oprah Winfrey in March last year.
    A truly dysfunctional family – Meghan, Tyler, Thomas Sr, Thomas Jnr and Samantha in times happier.
    In choosing to be the chief tin banger for the ‘Sussex Squad,’ Scobie will go down in history only for one thing: Being on the wrong side of history. The public have seen through him and they’ve seen through the rotten royals who have done nothing but damage to the monarch, her first born son and Prince Harry’s elder sibling. Shame on him.
    Tampa court Florida
    This is going to be a case that could will send shockwaves on both sides of the pond. It will be nothing but a sh*tshow between a woman clearly incapable of understanding the art of diplomacy and a half-sister she’s most definitely thrown under the bus. Whatever the outcome, that this has even reached this stage just proves that the Duchess of Sussex is nothing but a selfish sleazebag who is very, very, very badly advised.
  • Markle v Markle – £60,000 Defamation Demand Against Duchess of Sussex

    Markle v Markle – £60,000 Defamation Demand Against Duchess of Sussex

    As estranged half-sister of the Duchess of Sussex demands £60,000 from her for defamation, we remind the ‘Modern Day Mrs Simpson’ that she’d do well to heal her familial rifts in private

    This morning, the Mirror’s Patrick Hill revealed the “latest twist in a bitter legal row between siblings Meghan [the Duchess of Sussex], 40, and Samantha [Markle], 57” has come “days after Meghan filed a 27-page court bid in Tampa, Florida, to dismiss a defamation case brought by Samantha, who wants £60,000 damages.”

     

    Jamie Alan Sasson, a lawyer representing Samantha Markle, told the paper:

     

    “Our intention is to take this case to a jury trial. I feel confident we’ll get past the motion to dismiss. We expect to start taking depositions in this case within the next six months.”

     

    Responding previously on 13th May, the Duchess of Sussex’s lawyer countered:

     

    “This is a defamation case without any merit.”

     

    Referring to PR peddler Omid Scobie’s tawdry tome, they went further and added:

     

    “The authors of Finding Freedom made the statements, and there are no allegations – nor could there be – that Meghan wrote that book or otherwise controlled its composition and editing.”

     

    Frankly, this latest episode reflects very badly on drippy Prince Harry’s American wife. If she had an ounce of sense, instead of continuing this row, this audacious actress would organise a meeting with her estranged father and siblings and put a stop to this charade for once and for all. Instead, by continuing this toxic familial war, all the duchess does is add fuel to the fire and simply shows herself to be what one Twitter user accurately termed a “self-centred, self-serving attention whore.”

     

    Pictured top – The snarling and selfish Duchess of Sussex (right) faces a demand for £60,000 for allegedly defaming her sibling Samantha (left).

     

    This morning we asked the nigh on 13,000 followers of the @SteepleTimes account on Twitter: “Which of these mouthy minxes would you most like to see disappear into obscurity? Which one would you most like to no longer get news coverage?” Quite predictably, thus far with 22 hours to go, the vast majority of respondents have plumped for the Duchess of Sussex with Katie Price in second place, Rebekah  Vardy in third and Amber Heard in fourth.
    The Duchess of Sussex is being “sued as ‘Meghan Markle’” in the case. It has been brought by her sister in the United States District Court Middle District of Florida Tampa Division.
    Elsewhere, another court battle involving Prince Charles’ second son’s wife being called “the dreaded Meghan” is brewing away. It involves the academic Dr Anne Anderson and the Arts Society.
    Samantha Markle
    In times past, the ever so conveniently forgetful former actress was happy to pose for pictures with her the sister she is now at war with both in the courts and via the media.
    Thomas Markle
    Equally, the ever so conveniently forgetful former actress – a woman who clearly has trouble remembering how many times and when she got married – was happy to not only pose for pictures with her papa and to take his money to pay for her education also.
    Actress Meghan Markle kissing
    The ambitious and audacious wife of Prince Harry would, however, like pictures such as this – and others far worse – erased from the Internet.
    Elsewhere this week on ‘Palace Confidential,’ former senior palace aide Dickie Arbiter remarked of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex deciding to do another television series: “It smacks of desperation. It’s a bit rich, two people who left the UK, walked out of the Royal Family, because they wanted privacy, they’ve done nothing else but put themselves up front and a week doesn’t go by when there isn’t some sort of statement coming out of their PR people.”