Category: Crime

Beecher ‘Barks’ (Well, Actually ‘Whimpers’) Back

Mucky madam Ghislaine Maxwell’s wannabe mouthpiece Jay Beecher barks, well whimpers, to ‘The Steeple Times’ on behalf of the convicted criminal sex offender

Jay Beecher has long been an attention seeking arse-licker and with his latest missive to The Steeple Times, received at 7:37am this morning, he’s yet again proved himself as nothing but a soppy sap.

First, in the mid 2010s, this noxious nitwit – whose only known limited company was curiously dissolved in March 2021 – turned his attention to UKIP. Then, when he was suspended by that ragbag of rotters for “using his time to attack people in his party rather than to build up support,” in September 2016, he hotfooted it over to the Tories – a party that clearly didn’t bother to do any due diligence.

Subsequently fined for driving whilst disqualified, driving with no insurance and having no MOT on his car whilst standing as a Conservative candidate in a by-election for Peterborough Council in June 2017, Beecher didn’t make any kind of apology. Instead, he pathetically blubbed: “This is a personal matter. It was a misunderstanding. It won’t affect me going forward.” That day, the violins most definitely played.

Continuing the theme of associating with failure and freaks, Beecher sidled further to the right next by getting himself involved with Politicalite – a much derided website that has published the works of the far-right, anti-Islam leader of For Britain and associate of convicted criminal Tommy Robinson, Anne Marie Waters.

In a somewhat sloppy and slovenly style, this vexatious and vain individual was able to share content on Politicalite that included not only praising a statement by Waters as “strong” and “nail-on-the-head” in her approach, but it is where also he started banging on about grooming and voter fraud. In calling anyone he didn’t like “absolute morons, lol [sic]” there, he also illustrated that literary genius most definitely emanates from his self-proclaimed “investigative journalist’s” somewhat addled mind.

Apparently, things haven’t worked out well for Politicalite – whose homepage has now been reduced to putting out clearly paid for ‘features’ on behalf of Heart Bingo and claims about being “silenced” rather than sharing anything political – and so, in recent months, Beecher moved his energies towards trying to become a mini-me of PR peddler Brian Basham and established another website. He hasn’t achieved anything close to one per cent of the man known only for his involvement in ‘Dirty Tricks’ thus far in column inches as part of this bonkers endeavour.

On the especially amateurishly presented The Maxwell Files, Beecher has offered up total claptrap about the case of the incarcerated sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell and sought to share information damaging about victims this clearly evil woman has now been convincingly convicted of abusing. He does so without merit and, as ever is the case with this wretched piece of toerag, yet again shows himself as desperate to elevate himself to a position in the public eye. Now, today, though he’s blocked us on Twitter in true Cowardy Custard fashion, he this morning sent through a missive. In it, this clear wack job whinged:

“A false statement to claim people ‘haven’t heard a word from me’ since the verdict – I’ve been speaking about it, tweeting about it, and writing about it every day, and have been mentioned in the Daily Mirror and others. As too have the others you mention. But one can’t expect anything less than demonstrable lies to be printed on blog site The Steeple Times.”

Continuing, lonesome lunatic Beecher finished:

“This website is hilarious – a blog written by a creepy bloke whom no-one has heard of, who works with conspiracy numpty Shaun Attwood (recently exposed as having promoted lies about the Epstein case), and whose vocabulary is so limited he regurgitates lines such as ‘mucky madam’ a million times; each time no doubt chortling to himself alone in his grimy flat as he punches each letter into his sticky keyboard.”

“The fact that this website’s disclaimer clearly states that it prints ‘fake news,’ just adds to the hilarity, and the irrelevance of its non-entity owner.”

Whilst clearly penned by a pugnacious person whose brain has obviously been tossed around in a wok ten times too many, it might do Jay Beecher well to focus on another matter outstanding – that of the libel case brought against him by the esteemed writer of Waking the Dead and co-founder of Byline Times Peter Jukes.

A crowdfunder supporting Mr Jukes – a decent and principled gent disgracefully defamed in Politicalite and elsewhere online in June 2021 – has already raised nearly £57,000 in pledges. Today, again, we remind readers of The Steeple Times to support this effort to root out the cancerous poison spread by the likes of Jay Beecher and today we call out him and others supporting the deviant daughter of the pension pot plundering murderer Robert Maxwell.

Pictured top – In November 2020, Jay Beecher shared a photo of himself “minglin’” with the “ultimate neighbour from hell” Priti Patel on Twitter. One of his ‘fans’ responded: “Gorgeous couple.” It’s no wonder they get on given the “neighbour from hell” Home Secretary likes “snitchin’ and bullyin’” just like him.

In September 2016, Jay Beecher – a prattling pillock who blocks anyone who dares call him out on Twitter – issued what he called a “long statement” – take that to mean a pyramid of piffle and a deluge of drivel – about his “great party” UKIP had become a “mates club” controlled by the likes of Arron Banks (“who use our party as his plaything”). He claimed “poisonous elements” were trying to destroy the ragbag “from within” and subsequently a spokesman for the party stated: “Mr Beecher has been suspended after repeatedly making deliberate and demonstratively false allegations against other members of the party, and doing so to various media outlets.” Now, after trying all manner of other avenues as part of his fame seeking, he’s latched himself onto the croaked paedophile Jeffrey Epstein’s now also convicted sex offender, Ghislaine Maxwell. Talk about desperate; talk about pathetic and you’ll most certainly have to talk about Jay Beecher.

‘Politicalite’ – a warped organ for which Jay Beecher penned a series of drivel between 2018 and 2021 – announced on the 16th December that it was “taking an extended break due to personal family reasons and will be back in the New Year.” On the 30th December, after sharing a clearly paid for “don’t miss” puff piece about Heart Bingo and how bingo is “trendy” and “getting bigger” on Boxing Day – without labelling it as such – the online rag’s founder Jordan James announced: “Politicalite is back in January 2022 and promises in-depth investigations, big exclusives, entertainment exclusives and big stories that matter from across the UK, including a very ‘BIG’ surprise.”

Author, screenwriter, playwright and journalist Peter Jukes has attracted huge support for a crowdfunder to support his libel action against others Jay Beecher. We urge readers to join those who’ve back it already.

January 7, 2022
Dame Cressida Dick – Four Lives & Nine Lives

The BBC’s ‘Four Lives’ – a drama based on the serial killer Stephen Port – provides further illustration of the incompetence of the Metropolitan Police; it is time for wholesale reform and for cat-like Dame Cressida Dick’s nine lives to end

We’ve repeatedly suggested we truly don’t believe Dame Cressida Dick DBE, QPM could organise a piss-up in a brewery; now, with the airing of the three-part Four Lives on BBC One, comes further proof that this incompetent woman and those that work under her couldn’t even find a serial killer in a graveyard and whose failings resulted in three killings entirely avoidable.

Featuring the story of Stephen Port and four men he sadistically drugged, raped and murdered in Barking, London in 2014 and 2015 – Anthony Walgate, 23; Gabriel Kovari, 22; Daniel Whitworth, 21 and Jack Taylor, 25 – Four Lives, as The Guardian’s Lucy Mangan points out, does “make the victims live again.” It is a story that doesn’t just focus on the sickness of the slayer, but also one that celebrates the spirit and souls of the slayed and equally, it rightly illustrates the disgraceful ineptness and cackhandedness of the Met Police.

Described in March 2017 as a “catalogue of police failings,” the Met’s decision to ignore credible witnesses prepared to state what they knew about Port and their refusal to admit to the family members of the victims that the deaths of their loved ones were anything other than “sordid misadventures gone wrong” – in spite of clear evidence to the contrary – again illustrates a police force riddled with rot.

Officers mixed up clearly different individuals featured in CCTV imagery walking and not walking with Port and did not even listen to the woman who found the bodies of two of the victims on two separate occasions in the same location in the very same churchyard. Of this, she later remarked: “They had no idea what they were doing.” Instead, they basically just wanted this whole “episode” swept under the carpet and without the tenacity of one victim’s mother, they’d have gotten away with just that.

The Metropolitan Police emerge from this story with yet more stains of incompetence and guilt and yet again today we call for its head’s head to roll. It is impossible to bring back the four lives lost to Stephen Port, but it is possible for cat-like Dame Cressida Dick’s nine lives to finally end. She ought to do the decent thing as we begin 2022: Resign with her head held in shame.

‘Four Lives’ continues on BBC One tonight at 9pm and all three episodes are available now on iPlayer.

Pictured top – Rapist and serial killer Stephen Port (often monikered as ‘The Grindr Killer’ and pictured far left and left with Stephen Merchant playing him) was given a life sentence with a whole life order on the 25^th November 2016, meaning he we never be released; last night’s ‘Four Lives’ showed the force that Dame Cressida Dick (right) currently heads, yet again, to be inept and uncaring towards the families of victims. She, as head honcho, needs to take responsibility and after her having been seen to preside over countless other similarly grossly handled episodes, it is time for her do one thing: Just go.

Dame Cressida (pictured with Priti Patel and Boris Johnson) has previously come under fire over crises under her watch that have numbered the disgraceful shooting and killing of an innocent man, Jean Charles de Menezes. She has also been slammed over the Met’s use of stop and search tactics, the handlings of recommendations made after the botched Operation Midland, the arrests of attendees at a candlelight vigil for murdered-by-a-serving-Met-officer Sarah Eveard and complaints by the Daniel Morgan Independent Panel that she obstructed their inquiry into police corruption.

Dame Cressida Dick has been the Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis since 2017. She first joined the Metropolitan Police as a constable in 1983 and returned to the force in 2001 as first a commander before rising to the top of the tree. She is now under fire after ‘The Steeple Times’ revealed that a 1994 investigation into an alleged brothel being operated at the then home of the now convicted sex abuser Ghislaine Maxwell – a woman Dame Cressida went to both school and university with – in South Kensington, London was swept under the carpet and has never been reinvestigated. We again ask: “Why?”

January 4, 2022
Murky Maxwell, Vexatious Vine, & Rabid Rachel

Matthew Steeples calls out those who’ve tried to excuse “murky” Ghislaine Maxwell – most especially ‘journalists’ Sarah Vine and Rachel Johnson – and lauds those who’ve joined him in demanding the mucky madam no longer be called a “socialite”

Some of those who came out ‘in support’ or at least ‘in sympathy’ for Ghislaine Maxwell prior to her having been confirmed last week as nothing but a “convicted sex offender,” have unsurprisingly gone quiet. Others, including allegedly even her own husband Scott Borgerson, it seems, have unceremoniously ditched her.

Of these peoples’ views of croaked paedophile Jeffrey Epstein’s one-time lover, one or two have rather conveniently changed their minds and then there’s the case of two Tory tattling Daily Mail hacks – Rachel Johnson and Sarah Vine.

On 14^th November, Vine – the soon ex-wife-to-be of the “loose cannon, nutter” Labour to Tory transplant The Rt. Hon. Michael Gove MP – penned a column in which she banged on about how “Maxwell [was] not a live threat to others” and claimed she needed to “be treated with respect and humanity.” She showed her sympathy for this wicked woman’s plight and in doing so belittled the mucky madam’s victims.

Now, today, Vine has returned to the topic and – whilst avoiding taking stance on what punishment should be given out – noted: “It’s not the obvious Freudian aspects of Ghislaine’s life that I find most interesting. It’s what her trial tells us about the world in which we once lived – and the one in which we live today.”

Peddling herself as some kind of expert on high society in spite of having no known connection with such a world, comprehensive school educated Vine – a woman once mocked by fellow Tory MP wife Sophie Swire as laughably lowbrow and “lumbered with cooking all the food” whilst “bending over backwards to please the Camerons” – continued:

“Quite simply, it wasn’t just Ghislaine who was on trial in that New York courtroom, but an entire culture. A culture where wealth, privilege and power gave people permission to do whatever to whomever whenever they wanted, without fear of consequences… A culture that, when all is said and done, was rotten to the core.”

Turning to another topic, that of Brigitte Macron being outed as potentially transgender, Vine again brought up Maxwell and pointedly began with the words: “Madame Macron’s real murky past…” She concluded: “What does disturb me, especially in the light of the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, is the idea that [Macron] allegedly seduced her future husband when he was just 15 and she 39.”

In using the word “murky” of a lady subjected to what are apparently completely untrue rumours, vexatiously vicious Vine has yet again shown herself as someone who likes to have a pop at clearly wronged people like Madame Macron whilst excusing someone genuinely “murky” like Ghislaine Maxwell. It does her no favours and is yet again proof that it is time for this supporter of the reintroduction of the death penalty to be sent off to journalistic Siberia. Her ice cold manner might actually go down a bit there, after all.

Known for her especially vicious tongue, Sarah Vine (pictured here with her now estranged husband, Michael Gove) doesn’t like “the persistent bile and vitriol aimed at MPs across various social media channels such as Facebook and Twitter [as it] eggs on sick individuals, encouraging and – perhaps most importantly – [enabling] abusive and dangerous behaviour.” Today, she didn’t offer similar sympathy to the victims of Jeffrey Epstein’s co-conspirator, but instead banged on about high society and how its changing – a topic she clearly has no qualification to offer any kind of opinion on.

Though Sarah Vine called for the reintroduction of the death penalty in November 2021, she doesn’t seem to want to commit to supporting any kind of punishment for Ghislaine Maxwell; instead, today, she prefers to pick on Brigitte Macron and bring up a clearly ‘fake news’ story that ludicrously alleges that the French President’s wife is transgender. Shame on this preposterous, poisonous pen of clearly warped mind once described as having “the moral sure-footedness of an alleycat on a trampoline.”

Rachel Johnson (pictured with her brother Prime Minister Boris Johnson) is well known for being ridiculous and perhaps a little beyond bonkers. Her writing style has been described as “chummy burbling” and her gaffes have included “joking” that Rupert Murdoch told her brother to “kill” the BBC. Of that the fool later wrote: “Sorry to disappoint but Rupert Murdoch NEVER told the PM to get rid of the BBC as I am quoted as saying in today’s ‘Daily Mail.’ It never happened. Joke taken out of context. Totally my fault for agreeing to say ‘a few words’ about the future of the media. Apols to all who got excited.”

Remaining remarkably quiet on the other hand at this time, Boris Johnson’s sister and sometime colleague of Sarah Vine at the Daily Mail, Rachel, has yet to come out with her thoughts on the verdict and victims in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial.

Known for having more front than Harrods and a megaphone in place of a mouth, Ms. Johnson ludicrously expressed “pity” for Ghislaine Maxwell in The Spectator in November.

At the time, she went all “jolly hockey sticks” and was slammed after stating:

“It’s hard not to feel a batsqueak of pity for Ghislaine Maxwell – 500 days and counting in solitary confinement.”

“I intersected briefly with her at Oxford. As a fresher I wandered into Balliol JCR one day in search of its subsidised breakfast granola-and-Nescafé offering and found a shiny glamazon with naughty eyes holding court astride a table, a high-heeled boot resting on my brother Boris’s thigh.”

“She gave me a pitying glance but I did manage to snag an invite to her party in Headington Hill Hall – even though I wasn’t in the same college as her and Boris. I have a memory of her father, Bob, coming out in a towelling robe and telling us all to go home.”

“I’m sure fairweather friends would not reveal they went to a Ghislaine Maxwell party: as Barbara Amiel’s brilliant memoir Friends and Enemies proves, you only know who your real chums are when you’re in the gutter.”

Now, unsurprisingly, with only the prospect perhaps of an invite to Miss Maxwell’s penitentiary facility rather than a society party, Ms. Johnson will now have to go the same way as she did after calling the Duchess of Sussex “exotic.” Apologising for that particular gaffe, the journalist admitted in January 2018: “It didn’t go down well and I hereby apologise Harry” and now, we call on her to do the same to the victims of the convicted criminal Ghislaine Maxwell.

Elsewhere, in an opinion piece in today’s The Guardian, Joan Smith was one columnist, however, who got it right when she echoed my own sentiments – expressed on Thursday in an article titled: “Ghislaine Maxwell – From ‘Seasoned Socialite’ to ‘Sordid Sex Trafficker’” – and stated: “Let’s call Ghislaine Maxwell what she is – a sex trafficker, not a socialite.”

Going further, Smith summed up this wicked woman perfectly in three paragraphs. Of the deviant daughter of ‘The Bouncing Czech,’ she remarked:

“Predators have a sixth sense when it comes to choosing co-conspirators. Maxwell was a grown woman when she met Epstein… It must have occurred to Maxwell by now that the two men she put absolute faith in, her father and her ex-lover, both left her to face the music after their apparent suicides. And for what?”

“The columnist Barbara Amiel, who is married to the former newspaper magnate Conrad Black, recalls a conversation that shows Maxwell in an unexpected and highly unflattering light. ‘I bet I’m in charge of more lavatories and bathrooms than you are,’ Maxwell suddenly said as the two women were walking along a beach. While Amiel thought about it, Maxwell reminded her to include those on planes. ‘Thirty-nine,’ said Amiel and Maxwell’s face lit up. ‘I win,’ she exclaimed.”

“Questions about Maxwell’s relationship with Epstein have now been cleared up. She procured girls for him and it speaks volumes about her moral compass, or lack of it, that she evidently cared more about the number of lavatories in his mansions than the vulnerable teenagers she exposed to sexual assault and rape.”

January 2, 2022
6pm Ghislaine
Jury in alleged mucky madam Ghislaine Maxwell trial asked to consider deliberating until 6pm – one hour later than usual; probably because Judge Alison J. Nathan is ready to get on with her next chapter in her life courtesy of President Joe Biden

The patience of Judge Alison J. Nathan – a woman clearly desperate to get on with her next stage in life after being promoted to a higher court by President Joe Biden – has clearly yet again been tested as she awaits a verdict from the jury in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial in New York.

After previously having had a mini-meltdown with the deviant daughter of the pension pot plunderer Robert Maxwell’s lawyers after they tried to get extra time to get their witnesses to show up in spite of having had over 500 days to prepare them, Judge Nathan yesterday asked jurors in the case to consider sitting an extra hour beyond their normal 5pm closing time.

Clearly and most apparently sick of them asking questions focused on details such as the definition of the word “enticement” – which she summed up to mean “to attract, induce or lure using hope or desire” – Judge Nathan pointedly added of her 6pm suggestion: “I don’t mean to pressure you in any way. You should take all the time that you need.” Hammer down, “Next!”

The case against Ghislaine Maxwell

The late ‘Cap’n Bob’s’ deviant daughter Ghislaine Maxwell is on trial before Judge Alison J. Nathan on counts of:
- Conspiracy to entice minors to travel to engage in illegal sex acts.
- Enticement of a minor to travel to engage in illegal sex acts.
- Conspiracy to transport minors with intent to engage in criminal sexual activity.
- Transporting a minor with the intent to engage in criminal sexual activity.
- Sex trafficking conspiracy.
- Sex trafficking of a minor.
- Lying under oath (to be heard separately at a later date).
Ghislaine Maxwell failed to get her 81-year-old former neighbour in Kinnerton Street, Belgravia, the publican Kevin Moran, into court to testify for her as he could not turn up in New York in suitable time to appear Judge Nathan. Out of her 35 proposed witnesses, only 9 actually gave evidence in support of the wicked wastrel wench.

60-year-old since Christmas Day Ghislaine Maxwell has managed to get her brothers and sisters including Kevin, Ian and Isabel (pictured right) to turn up to support her at her trial in New York. Her husband since 2016, Scott Borgerson (left) – a man unknown to her very own siblings until her arrest at her ritzy pad in New Hampshire, Tuckedaway, in July 2020 – has failed to even bother to put in appearance and has allegedly busied himself living-it-up with a “yoga enthusiast” who reportedly “has an ass that could crack open a walnut” named Kris McGinn. So much for better, for worse, for richer, for poorer, it seems; so much for standing by your woman, Scott.

Already clearly fearing for the worst possible outcome (i.e. the conviction of their decidedly deviant alleged mucky madam sibling, Ghislaine), the Maxwell family have been spinning out stories claiming that there will be immediate appeal if there is a conviction coming their way. In May this year, using their @RealGhislaine Twitter account, the family had a pop at those making allegations against the perverted pest Kevin Spacey – who unsurprisingly was a close mate of Jeffrey Epstein and his one-time lover – and remarked: “Kevin Spacey has suffered… repetitional [sic] damage from CD’s allegations. Info & allegations that are highly sensitive & of a personal nature can flow both ways… It would be harder to mitigate against that stigma if CD were permitted to remain anonymous.” No doubt, said daughter of the murderer-robber baron Robert Maxwell would like all of her four accusers named (and shamed) now also.
December 28, 2021
Monster of the Moment – John Goodier (AKA ‘Claire Goodier’)

Trans paedophile turned deviant dog abuser Claire Goodier deservedly jailed for having group sex with an Alsatian whilst high on cocaine; the case echoes that of the 2017 conviction of the perverted pensioner Carol Bowditch – a woman with a ‘passion’ for St Bernards

In April 2017, The Steeple Times featured the story of the much deserved “humiliation” of a perverted pensioner from Evedon, Lincolnshire named Carol Bowditch after she was caught having penetrative vaginal sex with a St Bernard, a black Labrador and an Alsatian.

In September 2019, we followed up with the story of another dog rapist, the exotically monikered Hansel Marion DeBartolo III (AKA ‘Sexy Vegan’), after this self-professed “vegan messiah” followed up an appearance on the Dr Phil show with an online video in which he disgustingly “performed an act of bestiality” on a pit bull terrier. His shocked mother unsurprsingly responded: “[He’s] a sociopathic piece of crap.”

Now, this morning, with the MailOnline reporting on the case of a 60-year-old “paedophile who identifies as female” being jailed for 20 months for having group sex in Bournemouth with an Alsatian we can complete what quite frankly is one of the twisted trios humanity must ever have come across.

Reported on by a journalist named Dan Sales for the paper, the repugnantly revolting actions of John Goodier – whom “was listed under a male name but with a note added to be addressed in the hearing as Claire” – were set out before Chester Crown Court at sentencing yesterday before the “sobbing” sodomite was sent down.

Convicted of possessing indecent images of children in 2006 and 2009, this serial offender had previously been “astonishingly lucky” to avoid jail in the past according to Judge Steven Everett, but was yesterday condemned as “despicable, disgusting and depraved.”

In July 2019, according to prosecutor Paulinus Barnes, a routine check by police on Goodier’s home due to her being on the sex offenders’ register for life, resulted in the discovered of a laptop containing 31 indecent images of sex acts with an Alsatian breed of dog.

Of these, Mr Barnes remarked:

“She admitted possession of the images. She said she had fantasised about it for a number of years and after talking about it with people in Northwich, was put in touch with others in Bournemouth. She travelled down there in December 2018 and took part in the sex act with other people and the Alsatian dog.”

Summing up and not accepting Goodier’s laughable defence that she was “frank and honest” and working towards an “improvement in her attitude and approach,” Judge Everett slammed this clearly insane individual’s vile actions. Of her, he concluded:

“You are a long, long way from changing your life. You deceitfully took part in a cocaine-fuelled incident with other persons.”

“Since the terrible offence took place you kept the images unashamedly for your own sexual gratification.”

“In the middle of all this, you failed to comply with the terms of an order, which some might say is a minor breach, but it’s not for the first time.”

“Your record is appalling and it could be said you were astonishingly lucky not to go to prison previously. A message must go out that if you commit such disgusting behaviour then you must go to prison.”

Though a clearly anything but remorseful Goodier will now serve 20 months, be subject to a 10-year Sexual Harm Prevention Order and yet again be forced to sign the Sex Offenders’ Register, no mention was made of the fate of the poor, buggered Alsatian or what had been done about the equally sadistic others that took part in the Bournemouth incident.

According to the ‘MailOnline’: “A Sexual Harm Prevention Order is under [Goodier’s] new name, but it is not clear whether she will serve time in [a] men’s or [a] women’s prison.” Frankly, however, what truly matters is that this repugnant specimen is kept well away from the guard dogs of any prison she is held in.

On conviction for having penetrative vaginal and oral sex with a St Bernard, a black Labrador and an Alsatian in April 2017, when she was surprisingly spared jail, Carol Bowditch ludicrously declared: “I was unaware it was illegal.” She was given a community order with 12 months supervision and a 16-week night-time curfew” by Judge Michael Heath. Of her, he quite rationally concluded: “I am told that you have received public humiliation as a result of the publicity that this case has attracted. That does not surprise me.”

Californian freak with a desire to be president Hansel Marion DeBartolo III (AKA ‘Sexy Vegan’) is known for appearing on the ‘Dr Phil’ show. He’s also known for comparing himself to an “exotic Lamborghini SV” and filming himself raping dogs. He once declared: “Do what you do as long as you are not harming anyone, animals and insects too,” but clearly did not apply such a sentiment to his own sexual antics. He should be kept away from zoos and pet shops forever.

In July 2018, Isaac Butterfield told his 1.75 million followers on YouTube that he thought ‘Sexy Vegan’ was “skinny, loud and obnoxious.” He went on to add of this self-declared “vegan messiah”: “Please don’t f**king procreate ever!” We join the countless millions echoing these sentiments and suggest instead that Hansel Marion DeBartolo III be locked up for the safety of himself (and innocent animals everywhere).

December 23, 2021
The Met & Maxwell – The Cressida Dick & Ghislaine Maxwell Connection

As ‘The Sun’ hints that she was a madam in London in the 2000s, we ask why wasn’t the 1994 Met Police investigation into what went on with high-class hookers at Ghislaine Maxwell’s South Kensington Mews house not taken further?

Now deservedly under fire and slammed as “incompetent and obstructive,” Dame Cressida Dick DBE, QPM became a police constable with the Metropolitan Police in 1983 and “within 10 years was promoted to chief inspector,” according to The Guardian.

Dame Cressida’s life prior to joining the rozzers was gilded. Oxford born and educated in the “leafy” environs of “the successful academic battery farm” Oxford High School and an alumna there of Ghislaine Maxwell, according to The Times, “Britain’s (current) top police officer” went on to the Dragon School whilst the ‘Bouncing Czech’s’ decidedly deviant daughter progressed through various educational establishments.

Curiously, both women also later came to share having studied at Balliol College, Oxford in the early 1980s. Though it remains unknown if their paths crossed on any other level subsequently, we again today remind readers that in 1994, Ghislaine Maxwell’s home between 1989 and 1997, 69 Stanhope Mews East, South Kensington, London, SW7, was placed under surveillance by the Metropolitan Police on the suspicion that someone was running a high-class brothel from that very address.

69 Stanhope Mews East, South Kensington, London, SW7 5QT was the subject of a covert surveillance exercise by the Metropolitan Police in 1994 whilst under the ownership of the pension pot plundering ‘Cap’n Bob’s’ decidedly deviant daughter. Very young ladies of a certain type were seen coming coming and going during the period and it was suspected by neighbours that the house was being operated as a high class whore house run by a smart looking madam.

The current occupants of 69 Stanhope Mews are clearly sick of media attention and in spite of the mews house being on a public highway recently placed a “no photography or video recording” sign in their window. They also have a problem with dogs peeing on their plant pots.

Speaking exclusively to The Steeple Times in December 2020 of her experience, a businesswoman who lived opposite remarked:

“I was visited by officers from the Met Police in 1994 whom asked to use a bedroom in my property and to install a camera at the window to monitor the house diagonally opposite, 69 Stanhope Mews East.”

“I was not told at the time who the person concerned was, but I now realise it was Ghislaine Maxwell who was the owner of that house. I recall seeing very young girls coming and going from that building very often.”

“The officers remained for a week and then I heard no more about what happened next. All I knew was that a brothel was being operated from there and that the police wanted to close it down. They could have caught this evil woman then, but maybe her friendships with powerful people like Prince Andrew helped ensure her criminality was swept under the carpet.”

In this photograph, taken on 22nd November 2000 at the Red Cube nightclub in London, Ghislaine Maxwell sips on a cocktail as she stares at three women she was allegedly controlling.

Now, with The Sun yesterday running the headline: “SHOCKING: Ghislaine Maxwell took three girls to target wealthy men at party attended by Prince Charles” in 2000 with a photo to accompany as evidence, it seems pertinent to again enquire as to result of the 1994 investigation as the paper effectively hints that since croaked paedophile Jeffrey Epstein’s one-time lover was not just a procurer for him alone.

In a report by journalist Michael Hamilton, an unnamed broker who attended the after-party at the Red Cube nightclub for a screening of Charlie’s Angels in the presence of the heir to the throne encountered Maxwell there with a bevy of blondes.

Of the incident, The Sun stated:

“The unnamed broker said he is ‘appalled’ at the thought of Maxwell rubbing shoulders with guests.”

“He added: ‘The three girls came up to me and a friend and were being very flirtatious. They were in their late teens or early 20s.”

“One, who is on my right in the picture, seemed to be the leader and was asking us if we wanted to buy them drinks or go on somewhere. The girl on my left was quieter and more nervous. And the girl at the back was East European and also quiet. It seemed their questions were all to ascertain our wealth.”

“None of us were interested and – after a few minutes when that became clear – they were ushered away by Maxwell.”

“Our source, who found the snap while clearing possessions, added: ‘Maxwell, seemed to be shooting daggers at the girls – annoyed that they were spending too long with us and moved them along. We saw Maxwell walk with them into the crowd. She seemed to be in charge.’”

“‘My friend and I talked about whether they might be escorts. It is shocking when I think back to that night, considering what I’ve read about Maxwell and Epstein. Obviously, she hasn’t been found guilty in her trial, but some of the claims are horrible and shocking.’”

Clearly given her already known longstanding connections to Prince Andrew, Miss Maxwell would most definitely have been on the radar of both the police and secret services in Britain from the 1980s onwards. We thus ask again: Why was nothing done about what was clearly going on at 69 Stanhope Mews East in 1994 especially given since that Maxwell allegedly “cared and befriended Minor Victim 3 in London, England, between about 1994 and 1995?”

In 1995, according to Wikipedia, Dame Cressida was transferred to Thames Valley Police, where she eventually became the chief superintendent and area commander for Oxford before returning to the MPS in 2001 as a commander.

Pictured top – Currently incarcerated alleged mucky madam Ghislaine Maxwell and currently deservedly under fire Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis Dame Cressida Dick DBE, QPM were educated at Oxford High School at the same time. They both subsequently attended Balliol College, Oxford in the early 1980s.

December 20, 2021
Sue Homan – Justice for Stuart Lubbock

Interview with rape and murder victim Stuart Lubbock’s ex-wife Sue Homan by Shaun Attwood and Matthew Steeples goes viral on YouTube

Stuart Lubbock was brutally raped and murdered at the home of the deservedly since disgraced ‘entertainer’ Michael Barrymore on 31^st March 2001.

Now, though over 20 years have passed and Mr Lubbock’s father, Terry, sadly himself died without having seen justice done in September this year, his late son’s ex-wife Sue Homan is courageously continuing to campaign for justice.

In the wake of the arrest and subsequent release without charge of a 50-year-old from Cheshire in August on the suspicion of murder and indecent assault due to there being “insufficient evidence to reach the level where there is a realistic chance of a successful prosecution,” in November, Ms Homan gave an interview to Shaun Attwood’s True Crime Channel about her take on this tragic story.

Co-hosted by Matthew Steeples of The Steeple Times, the 41:19-minute feature was uploaded to YouTube late last week and has already been viewed over 13,100 times. In it, Sue Homan shares a heartbreaking story of loss, grief and injustice and yet again reminds viewers that justice still needs to be done. Her dedication to the campaign is clearly illustrated and yet again shown here is an example of the worst kind of a miscarriage of injustice.

Following up, again today, we remind readers of the words of Essex Police:

“Nine people went to the party at Michael Barrymore’s house, but only one of them – Stuart – ended up being violently sexually assaulted and murdered.”

“We know not everyone at that party was responsible for what happened, but someone was. We also know that not everyone at that party may know what happened, but someone does.”

“We want the people who do have information to come forward and talk to us – it is never too late to do the right thing and give the Lubbock family the answers and justice they have waited so long to have.”

#Justice4Stuart

Pictured top (left to right) – Disgraced TV ‘personality’ Michael Barrymore, rape-murder victim Stuart Lubbock and tireless campaigner for justice for her ex-husband, Sue Homan.

‘True Crime Channel’ host Shaun Attwood and editor-in-chief of ‘The Steeple Times’ Matthew Steeples interviewed Sue Homan in Guildford, Surrey in November 2021.

The late Stuart Lubbock (1969 – 2001) and his grave. Rightly, his family declared that he is “missed by everyone who knew and loved you.”

Indicative of how distasteful and shameless he is, Barrymore pretended to be Adolf Hitler whilst in the ‘Celebrity Big Brother House’ in January 2006; the late Terry Lubbock – whom tirelessly campaigned for justice for his raped and murdered son to the end of his days – rightly continued to call upon the disgraced ‘entertainer’ to tell the truth about what occurred at his bungalow on 31st March 2001. He sadly never received any meaningful cooperation from Barrymore and it is a disgrace that the ex-television presenter and the seven others present that night have failed to truthfully co-operate with Essex Police’s investigations.

In September, just hours after Terry Lubbock passed away without having seen justice done for his son, Michael Barrymore took to Twitter and callously declared: “Do what you want in life. X.” Previously, when interviewed, this morally and financially bankrupt cretin was asked if he knew who the people hiding information about the rape and murder of Stuart Lubbock were. His answer was: “Yes I do… Yes. I do. But I’m not going to say their names. I just hope they are brave enough to come forward one day.” Shame on him, shame on him.

Indicative of how distasteful and shameless he is, Barrymore pretended to be Adolf Hitler whilst in the ‘Celebrity Big Brother House’ in January 2006; the late Terry Lubbock – whom tirelessly campaigned for justice for his raped and murdered son to the end of his days – rightly continued to call upon the disgraced ‘entertainer’ to tell the truth about what occurred at his bungalow on 31st March 2001. He sadly never received any meaningful cooperation from Barrymore and it is a disgrace that the ex-television presenter and the seven others present that night have failed to truthfully co-operate with Essex Police’s investigations.

The scene of the rape and murder of Stuart Lubbock on 31st March 2001: Michael Barrymore’s then home, 4 Beaumont Park Drive, Roydon, Harlow, Essex, CM19 5HB. The property was most recently sold for £1.33 million in 2017 whilst Barrymore had paid £392,500 for it in 1998 and was forced to sell it for £802,000 in 2005 to cover costs related to his bankruptcy.

Justice for Stuart Lubbock – The people who need to man-up and tell the truth about what happened at Michael Barrymore’s home on 31^st March 2001

Michael Parker (AKA Michael Barrymore) – Allegedly loudly said: “I need a f**k” in a taxi as he left the Millennium Nightclub to return to his home, the scene of the death of Stuart Lubbock. Barrymore later lied to a coroner’s court about facilitating drug taking at his house on the night in question also.

Barrymore claimed to have been first to have discovered the body of Stuart Lubbock at 5.45am, called his manager Mike Brown before the ambulance arrived and then left the premises. He admits that was “wrong” and also bizarrely told Piers Morgan that in spite of “knowing others were hiding secrets about what happened to Mr. Lubbock” that “I am not going to say their names. I just hope they are brave enough to come forward one day.”

Mike Brown – Agent of Michael Barrymore. Called to the property before emergency services arrived.

Kelly Campbell – Had met Michael Barrymore for the first time on the night of the incident. Claimed not to have been aware of what happened.

James Futters (sometimes spelt ‘Futers’) – A paper boy turned chef. Described as “a local from the village” and a “friend and neighbour of Barrymore.” Claimed to have been the first to discover the body with Simon Shaw and stated: “[It was not] Michael Barrymore and not Jonathan Kenney [who found him].” Later, of him the Evening Standard reported: “Barrymore offered James Futters a white powder on his finger saying: ‘Do you want to try this?’ Mr Futters told the inquest that he leaned forward and licked the powder.”

Claire Jones – Then aged 17. Had met Michael Barrymore for the first time on the night of the incident. Claimed not to have been aware of what happened but told the police that she “saw Barrymore rummaging through drawers and changing his clothes before police arrived. When he left the house, he had a ‘bundle of material’ under his arm,” according to the Evening Standard. “She added: ‘Jonathan (Kenney) was rushing through the bungalow before the ambulance and police arrived. I got the impression he was hiding something.’”

Jonathan Kenney – Estate agent, drag queen and Michael Barrymore’s then lover; later arrested on suspicion of murder but never charged; known for having a “record of violence.” Claimed to have been the first to have discovered the body and is now aged 50.

Justin Merritt – A dustman from Essex. Later arrested on suspicion of murder but never charged. Later paid £30,000 by the News of the World for an interview in which he stated Barrymore had “rubbed cocaine on Stuart Lubbock’s lips shortly before he died.”

Kylie Merritt – Sister of Justin Merritt. She also alleged Barrymore “rubbed cocaine on Stuart Lubbock’s lips shortly before he died” (curiously in the wake of her brother selling his account of the night).

Simon Shaw – Described as “a local from the village.” Michael Barrymore supposedly “ran off” to Mr. Shaw’s house to “buy himself thinking time [for two hours] before he was questioned by the police [at 7.49am].”

In addition, others, who’ve never been identified could also have possibly been present. If they were, they should come forward or be named by those listed above.

December 19, 2021
The Power Play of Maxwell & Nathan
As “monster mover” Ghislaine Maxwell claims to be too frail to testify at her trial and gets a rejection over having her witnesses testify under pseudonyms, the judge in the case pops off to Washington to plan her own future after a nomination from President Biden; a true power play is now underway

On Wednesday, Judge Alison J. Nathan “paused from the trial [of Ghislaine Maxwell] for a trip to Washington, where she faced questions of a different sort” according to Benjamin Weiser of The New York Times.

Now nominated to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit by President Biden, Judge Nathan “was grilled at her confirmation hearing by members of the Senate Judiciary Committee. The questions came mostly from Republicans, who asked about her views on guns rights, capital punishment, compassionate release requests by felons during the pandemic, as well as her past writings and legal advocacy.”

Echoing her earlier approach of keeping alleged mucky madam Maxwell’s ‘little black book’ to remain secret to “avoid ‘needless’ namedropping,” Judge Nathan, when asked by Senator Mike Lee, a Republican of Utah: “Should illegal immigrants be allowed to cast votes in state and local elections?” answered: “That’s a policy question that would be inappropriate for me, as a sitting court judge or a nominee to the Second Circuit, to weigh in on.”

Clearly a lady on a mission to progress her career after ‘The Trial Of The Decade’ ends, the judge was then asked: “Do you think America is mostly good or mostly bad?” by Senator John Kennedy, Republican of Louisiana.

The New York Times reported on her clearly strategically motivated answer:

“She answered by describing a walk she took on Tuesday with her sons to the Supreme Court, where she once had been a law clerk, and of seeing the inscription engraved above the entrance, ‘Equal Justice Under Law… I’m proud to be a part of this American judicial system,’ Judge Nathan said.”

“Yes, ma’am,” Mr. Kennedy said. “But do you think America is mostly good or mostly bad?’ ’America is mostly good, Senator,’ she replied.”

Returning to her New York courtroom on Thursday, Judge Nathan rejected Miss Maxwell’s attempts to have some government defence witnesses testify under pseudonyms or partial names. In doing so, she quite rightly drew a clear distinction between the need to protect the identities of alleged crime victims and the privacy concerns of ‘The Bouncing Czech’s’ deviant daughter’s friends and cronies.

Though many are questioning many of the strange things going on at this trial, one can now only hope that the concept that nobody – however powerful they may or may not be – should be allowed to be above the law… And that must include Ghislaine Maxwell and those supporting her.

Pictured top – A protestor outside the New York court where Ghislaine Maxwell is on trial with a placard reading: ‘Media Silent’ on Thursday; 49-yeard-old Judge Alison J. Nathan with Chuck Schumer, the senate majority leader, during a Senate committee hearing on Wednesday.

A power play between a powerful woman of the past and a powerful woman of the future – Ghislaine Maxwell and Judge Alison J. Nathan are two well connected individuals who’ve been brought together in the oddest and most seedy of circumstances. Whether the former will actually take to the stand during her trial remains to be seen, but such a course of action appears more and more unlikely.

The case against Ghislaine Maxwell

The late ‘Cap’n Bob’s’ deviant daughter is on trial in a power play before Judge Nathan on counts of:
- Conspiracy to entice minors to travel to engage in illegal sex acts.
- Enticement of a minor to travel to engage in illegal sex acts.
- Conspiracy to transport minors with intent to engage in criminal sexual activity.
- Transporting a minor with the intent to engage in criminal sexual activity.
- Sex trafficking conspiracy.
- Sex trafficking of a minor.
- Lying under oath.
Some of the key ‘Famous Faces’ whose names have mostly thus far avoided mention at ‘The Trial of The Decade’
- Alexander Acosta
- Woody Allen
- Ehud Barak
- Tom Barrack
- Jean-Luc Brunel
- Naomi Campbell
- President Bill Clinton and his wife Hillary
- Alan Dershowitz
- Glenn Dubin and his wife Eva
- Bill Gates
- Geordie Greig
- Lord Mandelson
- Marvin Minsky
- George J. Mitchell
- Rupert Murdoch
- Peter Nygård
- Bill Richardson III
- Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman
- Kevin Spacey
- Jes Staley
- Ken Starr
- President Donald Trump and his potentially trafficked wife Melania
- Ivana Trump
- Chris Tucker
- Harvey Weinstein
- Leslie Wexner
- Prince Andrew, Duke of York and his live-in ex-wife Sarah, Duchess of York
A seriously sick set of power players – Alleged victim of sexual abuse by her own father turned alleged sex trafficker and sexual abuser of other women Ghislaine Maxwell flashing her cleavage at the since croaked paedophile Jeffrey Epstein and the since incarcerated fellow alleged sexual abuser Jean-Luc Brunel.

Though Ghislaine Maxwell will be “unlikely” to testify at her own trial – and remarked in November: “I am weak, I am frail. I have no stamina. I am tired. I don’t even have shoes which fit properly. They feed me rotten food. One apple had maggots in it. I have not been allowed to exercise. In my most recent court appearance, I was in leg irons for more than 12 hours and had to climb up and down stairs with my arms and legs shackled to my waist. My ankles are raw. I was given a pat-down so aggressive and violent, my underwear found itself in a place it doesn’t belong. The first underwear they gave me were enormous granny pants. You could have put five of me in them. I’ll spare you descriptions of the stains” – she clearly has contradicted herself with her somewhat bizarre “screen-siren-like” antics in the courtroom whilst clad in expensive cashmere and the statement: “I play peek-a-boo, hiding behind pillars and the guards join in. There are always smiles all round. Then I have a ‘monster move’ where I raise my hands and growl and they do it back. We laugh.” Here is a woman with exactly the same deviant streak as her pension pot plundering, murderer father, Robert.
December 17, 2021
Ditch Dodgy Dick

Incompetent and “obstructive” Dame Cressida Dick needs to be ditched by the Metropolitan Police after murder victim Daniel Morgan’s family drags her into a civil case

Metropolitan Police commissioner Dame Cressida Dick DBE, QPM is a woman who – in spite of being hopelessly inept and who an official inquiry found to have obstructed the panel appointed by the government to investigate claims that corruption blighted the hunt for Daniel Morgan’s killers in June this year – shockingly clings on to her position like a rat on a sinking ship.

A woman clearly unsuited to remain in her job, Dame Cressida, The Guardian this morning reported is now set to be dragged into a civil claim by the Morgan family.

Speaking to the paper, the family’s solicitor, Raju Bhatt, said:

“The claim alleges deliberate abuse or bad faith in the exercise of powers by any officer of the crown with knowledge or reckless indifference to the consequences of such conduct.”

“The repeated failure over decades to confront … corruption includes the obstruction of the independent panel’s work and the response of the Met to that panel’s findings.”

Going further, in a statement, the Morgan family added:

“The present commissioner, Cressida Dick, felt able to simply reject the panel’s key finding of institutional corruption within the Metropolitan police. Her role in obstructing the panel’s work – as detailed in their report – appears to have met with indifference and worse at the IOPC and Mopac where those charged with bringing her to answer for her role in this sorry state of affairs have shown themselves unable or unwilling to do so.”

“And, in their wisdom, the home secretary and the London mayor deemed it fit to extend her term in office before the ink had dried on the panel’s report.”

“We consider we have been left with no option but to bring a civil claim against the Metropolitan police in order to achieve some semblance of accountability. To that end, our solicitors have sent a letter of claim to the Metropolitan police directorate of legal services, and we await their response with interest.”

Dame Cressida has been deservedly criticised over the botched the Metropolitan Police’s handling over investigations into child sex abuse, their fruitless £30 million investigation into the murder of private investigator Daniel Morgan (pictured left) and her force’s handling over the use of stop and search of those of black and other ethnic minority backgrounds.

Instead of having focused on putting right the multiple errors she has presided over and solving the criminal crises of London, Dame Cressida ludicrously moaned about being “absolutely outraged” by the BBC’s Line of Duty drama series just a month after being deservedly slammed.

At the time, The Steeple Times remarked of a woman schooled alongside currently incarcerated and on trial in America Ghislaine Maxwell:

“In September last year, when we revealed that an escaped prisoner couldn’t get himself arrested in spite of handing himself in to the Met Police on seven, yes SEVEN occasions, we remarked “it’s long been known that Dame Cressida couldn’t police a pissup in a brewery,” but in the time since things have gotten worse at the force headed by this totally inept and clearly inane waste of space.”

“Aside from having been in charge of the operation in which a totally innocent man, Jean Charles de Menezes, was shot dead due to gross incompetence on the part of her officers in 2005 and given what The Sun termed “feeble” responses to “lawless protests by Extinction Rebellion and others,” the Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis’ response to the conviction of one of her own officers has been utterly showing of the fact that she truly isn’t fit for purpose.”

“Armed officer Wayne Couzens – who was indicatively nicknamed by colleagues at The Met ‘The Rapist’ yet nothing was done about him – has now pleaded guilty to the murder of Sarah Everard in March. How did his boss respond? With what The Sun quite rightly called out as “vapid assurances [that] lessons [have] been learned across the board.” Going further they remarked: “The people to blame for this predator being on the streets should be held to account,” whilst we add: SHAME ON HER.”

In 2018, this ludicrous woman blamed rising crime in London on social media rather than a lack of proper policing. She told Fiona Hamilton and Rachel Sylvester of ‘The Times’: “There’s definitely something about the impact of social media in terms of people being able to go from slightly angry with each other to ‘fight’ very quickly… It [social media] makes it harder for people to cool down. I’m sure it does rev people up.”

The commissioner of the Metropolitan Police has been slammed repeatedly by Londoners. Her reputation lies in tatters and it is time she just quit.

The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis’ decision to refuse to stand down over police handling of a vigil for the late marketing executive Sarah Everard – murdered in cold blood by one of her very own officers – provided proof of her arrogance. “No, I’m not considering my position,” she curtly commented.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=elSZtYkRQyY&feature=emb_imp_woyt
After the shooting of the entirely innocent Jean Charles de Menezes in 2005 by her officers, Dame Cressida did anything but take responsibility. She remarked of it: “The events of that day stay with one; I think about it quite often. It was a traumatic period. It was an awful time for so many people, obviously and most of all Jean Charles’s family, the people who were there when it happened, the firearms officers, the surveillance officers.” In response, de Menezes family called for her to be brought to book and quite justifiably later opposed her subsequent promotion.

Summing up how out-of-touch with reality she truly is, Dame Cressida stated of her force: “We’re not institutionally corrupt.” Her comments came after the failed £30 million investigation into the murder of Daniel Morgan was quite rightly condemned due to those involved most definitely being aided and abetted by corrupt Metropolitan Police officers. It is now time for her to consider her position and RESIGN.

December 13, 2021
Was Jeffrey Epstein Murdered?

Ian Maxwell’s ramblings on ‘The Spectator’s’ ‘Americano’ podcast are nothing but nonsensical, though his sister may have a point in suggesting Jeffrey Epstein could have been murdered

At The Steeple Times we’re loathe to trust a word that come from her lying lips, but for once Ghislaine Maxwell might be bang on the nail.

Speaking to The Spectator’s ‘Americano’ podcast on Friday, the alleged mucky madam’s brother, Ian, told host Freddy Gray that his sister is the only member of his family that believes her former lover, Jeffrey Epstein, was murdered in jail.

Mr Maxwell commented:

“I do [fear for my sister’s safety]… I am not wholly convinced that he killed himself. Actually, I think that that’s not been very well explained, how a man supposedly under 24/7 guard, in broadly similar isolated conditions to those of my sister is experiencing could somehow die on U.S. watch.”

“It’s extraordinary to me, so yes there is a possibility that she’s in some danger. I don’t buy the suicide watch regime. It’s a nonsense. She’s not a suicide risk. There’s been no evidence of any self-harm. Obviously she’s not a danger to any third parties – which a judge has acknowledged on numerous occasions, so this is – and I can only read it this way – torture and it’s designed to break her.”

“The result is, today, though she turns up for trial and looks the best she can, she is clearly frail, she’s clearly lost an enormous amount of weight and I don’t know how much more she can take.”

“I haven’t talked to my sister since the 10^th June 2019. I happen to remember that because all of the family got together for the first time in eight years on that day – which have been my father’s 96^th birthday. So, I remember it well.”

“I don’t buy a lot of the conspiracy theories at all. It so happens one of the conspiracy theories about my father is that he was murdered rather than committed suicide or died by accident.”

“And I would venture to believe that she may also think that Epstein was murdered… I do happen to think my sister does think that he was killed.”

“Racy images” that emerged this week showed the currently incarcerated mucky madam with her “breasts falling out of her skimpy top” as she massaged the feet of her since croaked paedophile lover. Prior to her trial, the Maxwell family have tried to portray their sibling as wholesome, decent and honest; they’ll have trouble explaining images such as these, however.

Robert Maxwell’s favourite child, front, with her siblings Anne, Kevin, the twins Isabel and Christine, Philip and Ian in London in June 2019.

Alluding to his role in PR peddling on his sister’s behalf, the ‘Bouncing Czech’s’ son remarked:

“She knows that I am talking to the media on her behalf and yes we can communicate with her through her lawyers because her lawyers, pretrial, were seeing her through Zoom and in-person for several hours a day.”

“Don’t forget the bulk of her sentence has been served in the middle of the pandemic when there were no in-person visits to prisons anywhere in the world I would have thought and certainly not America.”

“So, if we want to say things to her or get messages to her, we do it through the lawyers and they come back the same way. So, in that sense there is a communication, but it’s not the same as giving your sister a hug and saying ‘hi’ and so on.”

Going further, in a ramble of nonsensical proportions, Mr Maxwell attempted to garner sympathy for his sister and added:

“We’re very close as siblings. There’s a gap of fifteen years between my oldest sister Anne, who is now 73, and my youngest sister, Ghislaine, who’ll be 60 on Christmas Day.”

“When you’ve had the kind of alpha male father that we did, you tended to stay close as kids and we’ve done so as adults.”

“[Family life] for us was an extraordinary experience. Not because we had some father with a vast amount of wealth and access to all kinds of goodies. My father was a pretty tough dad and he was a believer that if you had privileges, you also had obligations and he was a pretty serious kind of guy and he brought us up to work hard and if we didn’t, we were belted pretty well and I was hit a few times.”

“But there was a lot of love there and I knew about the best side to stay of him. The best way I could describe this would be in the form of a Chinese proverb that says: ‘Never be too far from the sun that you freeze, never be too close to it that you burn’ and it’s a very narrow line. And we had to run it.”

“We’re pretty clear about [our father]. We love him, the only father we ever knew and I think at some point, we were all in fear of him, but the overwhelming memory of him is a positive memory and not a negative one.”

Turning to his sister replacing her clearly monstrous and alleged abuser of her father with another monster, Jeffrey Epstein, Mr Maxwell offered:

“I can see that is a relatively easy jump to make. She has had boyfriends. She had a very longstanding boyfriend for about seven years or so immediately following going out with Jeffrey, so sometime in the late 1990s, early 2000s, who also happened to be wealthy and so on.”

“She’s somebody who grew up with a demanding father, intelligent, she was present at constant dinners and lunches and social events where she met a lot of very interesting people. Some of them wealthy, some of them brilliant scientists and so on. So, she was used to being with intelligent men whom she could respect and so on and inevitably in those kind of circles, there’s a lot of money at the same time.”

“I don’t think that it follows that she went directly from my father to Jeffrey as a clone, but if it hadn’t been Jeffrey it would have been some other rich, intelligent man.”

“I suppose I became aware of [Epstein and Maxwell’s] relationship in the early 1990s, but I and my brother, Kevin, were in terrible trouble because our father’s businesses had blown up. We were directors of it, we were subsequently arrested in June 1992 and then we had four years in the wilderness and a very well covered trial, a criminal fraud trial which ran from 1995 to 1996.

“There was no time in that context other than to fight for our lives and I lost my marriage in that process and I didn’t see very much of my sister during that whole time. I couldn’t travel, our passports had been taken and so-on.”

“Only when we were acquitted in January 1996, finally we flew off to America to see Ghislaine and she affected a number of business introductions for us and on that occasion, I remember on that occasion, I remember meeting Jeffrey Epstein for lunch with Ghislaine and with Kevin and I have to say I didn’t warm to him.”

“He didn’t strike me as, he was a bit of a cagey character, clearly intelligent, had a certain charisma, but he was someone who took things from you rather than gave things back. Not a man, not a very clubbable man, not a man you want to go and have a drink with and that was the only time that I met him.”

“By the time I met him in 1996, that relationship had been ongoing on since 1992 for sure and I think it had therefore passed… I didn’t get [the impression they were together] when I was there with them, but you know, we now see photographs that have surfaced during the course of this trial that are, I don’t know what the dates there on them are, but are very early in their relationship and it is clear that she is very fond of him.”

Regarding his father’s preferential treatment of his sister, Mr Maxwell stated:

“I don’t think that’s true, though I know people think that because he ended up naming his boat ‘Lady Ghislaine,’ but the story behind that is a much more prosaic story. He actually wanted to call it the ‘Lady Elizabeth’ – and name it for my mother – but there already was a ‘Lady Elizabeth’ and you couldn’t have two boats with the same name.”

“I’m not sure, but I think what he decided was the way to best deal with it, so he went from my mother to my youngest sister, Ghislaine, and that’s how that happened, but Ghislaine, like all of our siblings, if she was in trouble, she was cast out and she had a fair amount of tough times with my father.”

Turning to his sister’s trial itself, Mr Maxwell added:

“I think that the key thing is that she should never have been put on trial. The case against her is really a case against Jeffrey Epstein. It’s been reversed engineered post his death against my sister and it’s been driven from the start by a combination of enormous embarrassment on the part of the U.S. legal authorities on the one hand and by the greed of the lawyers of the accusers on the other hand.”

“And that has whipped up tremendous fury against my sister that has totally trashed her presumption of innocence and has led to her being jailed for over 527 days in isolation, treated as guilty before any trial and by virtue of being a pre-trial detainee, she is innocent, but that’s been completely cast-aside.”

“She’s been, as I said, kept in isolation, she has been woken up every fifteen minutes throughout the night for over 500 days by torchlight – allegedly to see if she is alive. She is deemed to be a suicide risk. Patently she is not.”

“She’s been denied bail four times by the judge at first instance and twice by the appeal court judges.”

“She’s been brought to the trial as recently as yesterday in four-point shackles from her jail, forced to walk up and down stairs in the courtroom.”

“She’s not being fed properly. She’s not been able to see her lawyers for more than 15 minutes during the pre-trial and post hearings. I mean, this is outrageous and it’s in a first world country like the United States of America.”

“It’s a disgrace and it’s why the family lodged a complaint with the United Nations Working Group on Arbitary Detention in Geneva just about three weeks ago because America must be held to account for what has happened to her.”

The look of love – Alleged victim of abuse by her father turned alleged abuser of young women Ghislaine Maxwell and her since croaked paedophile lover Jeffrey Epstein. Here is a duo, whatever the outcome of the current trial, who’ll go down in history as mucky, murky and mendacious.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VeS38whavT4

December 12, 2021