The Steeple Times

Category: Loudmouths

  • Me, Me, Me Meghan Mocked – Meghan Markle’s Farcical Manchester Speech Derided

    Me, Me, Me Meghan Mocked – Meghan Markle’s Farcical Manchester Speech Derided

    As the dopey Duchess of Sussex is derided for her “me, me, me” speech in Manchester, her pugnacious PR peddler Omid Scobie continues his cretinous campaign against her husband’s family

    Today, as the new Prime Minister Liz Truss heads to Balmoral to see the Queen, it remains unknown as to whether her grandson Prince Harry and his wife – currently in Europe bigging themselves up in spite of the public clearly not wanting them present – will bother to do the same and pay a visit also.

     

    In Düsseldorf today for the Invictus Games but said to be have “free time” tomorrow before being expected at the WellChild Awards in London on Thursday, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex were deservedly slammed by Gyles Brandreth yesterday on ITV’s This Morning programme.

     

    Speaking of the dastardly duo, the much-loved veteran broadcaster and author declared: “The number of people being as sympathetic to them [the Sussexes] as they were initially does seem to be sort of thinning out a little bit… Once you make yourself the story, then you yourself become the story. What should be the story is the good works that you are doing… but, in fact, what we’re talking about is the family rift.”

     

    Unsurprisingly, elsewhere the MailOnline’s Mark Duell referenced an intervention by Omid Scobie – who he termed “Meghan and Harry’s friend and trusted media partner” – in which the feckless Finding Freedom ‘author’ laughably claimed: “This is very much about the work [that the couple] wanted to do ever since they stepped back.” The leading “Sussex Squaddie” and all-round troll did, however, fail to mention what role paymasters’ Netflix and Spotify would play in the charade and also neglected to justify his continuing campaign against other members of Prince Harry’s family.

     

    Turning to the speech to 2,000 young people in Manchester yesterday by the Duchess of Sussex, The Sun’s Sarah Grealish reported on a “Meg-A Snub” and shared news of the former Suits actress and her drippy husband being “booed and branded ‘fake royals’ by [the] crowd on [their] ‘me, me, me’ mini-tour.” The duchess referenced herself an astonishing 54 times during her 7-minute “nonsensical” tirade before the assembled gathering at the One Young World youth gala.

     

    Grealish added that the couple were faced with “anti-royal placards” and “one woman accused Meghan of being a ‘liar and a hypocrite’ and of launching an ‘attack’ on the royal family.” Another, “Janet from Manchester” is said to have added: “She’s a fake humanitarian and a fake feminist. She’s a social climber… She thought she could be a celebrity in the royal family and she’s the most toxic, divisive woman I’ve ever heard of in my life.”

     

    Pictured top – Plastic-not-anything-but-fantastic PR peddler not-a-journalist Omid Scobie (left) and his delusional puppet mistress, the Duchess of Sussex (right) yesterday in the north of England.

     

    Manchester
    The ‘Montecito Meddler’ turned up looking like a scarlet woman to give her speech yesterday. It was met with derision given it was just about herself rather than inspiring to the young people who’d paid upto £1,000 to be present.
    Jimmy Failla
    On Twitter, Jimmy Failla of ‘Fox Across America’ called out the Duchess of Sussex and remarked of her: “It takes a special kind of stupid to claim women are being held back on the SAME DAY they name a Female Prime Minister” in the United Kingdom.
    Meanwhile this morning, after the ‘Daily Mail’s’ Richard Eden referenced “charity clearly [starting] at home for mother and daughter” behind the One Young World charity – after ‘The Sun’ reported that Kate Robertson and her daughter Ella Robertson McKay took home £634,494 in pay between them last year in spite of the pandemic, ‘The Steeple Times’s’ editor Matthew Steeples expressed surprise that “Chanel-clad” Baroness Meyer – who Eden had previously called out for her “charitable” antics” – had not got in on the act.
    Unwanted
    The second son of Prince Charles and his late former wife Diana, Princess of Wales were told they were “fake royals” and to “f**k off” by one placard waving protestor. Another added: “[‘MeGain’] has used every card she can – racism, mental health, feminism. She’s not a feminist, she’s just a hypocrite.”
    Booed
    As the duo arrived at the Bridgewater Hall, they were booed and jeered from behind barriers by an angry mob. Their demand for a “ring of steel” security curtain to shield them from such did nothing except draw further attention to how much the British public truly dislike their audacious antics.
    Approval
    The couple’s popularity has plunged further and further into the quagmire in recent months. Nobody is surprised about that and they’re most certainly up there with non-sweating friend of child abusing sex traffickers Prince Andrew in the very, very disliked stakes.

    What’s the truth about the stories that abound about the Duchess of Sussex?

    • In November 2021, the duchess was forced to apologise to the Appeal Court in London for making a misleading statement in her privacy case against The Mail on Sunday’s publishers.
    • Her very own father, Thomas, has called out her many untruths about him and others again, again and again.
    • Of her claiming having got married the day before she actually did, Mr Markle stated: “Lying about the archbishop? How can you say: ‘We’ve been married three days before we got married’? Her lies are so obvious, I don’t know why she says them.”
    • Her very own half-sister, Samantha, who is currently bringing a defamation case against her, has called her out as a liar on multiple occasions also. It has been proven that the duchess’s claim that she hasn’t seen her sibling in over 20 years was proven untrue when a photo of the pair 13 years ago emerged.
    • Her very own half-brother, Thomas Jr., said of her: “I told Prince Harry, I think she’s going to ruin your life. She’s very shallow… She’s a phony, a bully, a jaded, shallow, conceited woman.”
    • The wife of Prince Harry has been called out on multiple occasions for spinning stories against other members of the royal family, most especially the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge.
    • Staff who’ve worked for her have complained that she is a bully and investigations into this remain ongoing.
    • The Duchess of Sussex is a known manipulator of the press and paparazzis and it has been claimed that she’ll “twist the truth” to get any headline she wants.
    • Questions remain as to how many times she’s actually been married in total. Some say twice, some say thrice.
    • Did the ‘Montecito Meddler’ meet Prince Andrew or Prince Harry first? Rumours abound that she could have spent time and holidayed with the former as long ago as 2001 and that her claim to have no prior knowledge of the royal family until 2016 is just utter baloney.
    • “Would you trust this woman with a bargepole?” is something often asked of this money motivated minx.

     

  • Tommy’s Trolls v Sussex Squaddies – Vile Abusive Troll Supporters of Ghislaine Maxwell, Tommy Robinson and Duchess of Sussex

    Tommy’s Trolls v Sussex Squaddies – Vile Abusive Troll Supporters of Ghislaine Maxwell, Tommy Robinson and Duchess of Sussex

    Whose troll is worse? The bigots who support racist Tommy Robinson, the apologists for mucky madam Ghislaine Maxwell or Meghan Markle’s ‘Sussex Squaddies’?

    Whilst Ghislaine Maxwell has pathetic PR peddling pillocks like Brian Basham and Jay Beecher still batting for her on social media in spite of the evidence pointing towards that they – just like the lawyers currently suing her for £754,000 ($878,000, €877,000 or درهم2.2 million) over their unpaid bills – won’t get a dime for their time, the likes of the Tommy Robinson and the Duchess of Sussex continue to follow her lead and encourage their deranged troll followers to harass anyone who dares call their appalling antics out.

     

    Yesterday, when rabid racist Robinson was trending on Twitter over his hate-stoking towards Pakistani men, I dared to suggest that it rather suited his narrative of profiteering from the somewhat beyond stupid supporters who’ve funded his lifestyle for long now, I was met with comments that included suggestions that I was a “grooming gang apologist” and indeed a “nonce” myself.

     

    Clearly endgendered with the intent of encouraging hate crimes against myself and others who agreed with my sentiments, these keyboard warriors are the kind of people that wouldn’t say boo to a goose in a pub, but assume that from behind their nasty net curtains they can make threats and issue slurs to their hearts’ contents.

     

    In the hours that followed, after calling out one particularly obnoxious woman believed to be called Lucy Terina (whose mangled missives are shared below along with those of ‘Sussex Squaddie’ leader Christopher Bouzy), Robinson’s ranters bombarded me with hate and suggested all kinds of nonsense. In doing so, however, all they did was illustrate to anyone rational that Twitter is simply an echo room where those that shout loudest simply make the biggest berks of themselves.

     

    The grubby groper Ghislaine Maxwell and the mendacious minx that is the Duchess of Sussex should take note – employing trolls simply puts you in the same league as the racist Tommy Robinson. Now please girls, pipe down and play nicely.

     

    Pictured top (left to right) – A covered in milkshake Tommy Robinson, a contemplative Ghislaine Maxwell and a seriously smug Duchess of Sussex.

     

    Fake-Followers
    Plastic-anything-but-fantastic Omid Scobie, like the equally off-his-merry-rocker chump Christopher Bouzy, peddles poison and lies for the Duchess of Sussex. He is not a journalist, but in fact someone who encourages gross mistruths about other members of the royal family to be spread. Whilst the rest of the world condemned the wicked wench formerly known as Meghan Markle for her ludicrous ‘Archetypes’ podcast, in his ‘Yahoo!Life’ column Scobie raged: “Once silenced by the establishment, it’s clear that Meghan finally has her voice back. A voice that will be very familiar to those who followed her before Harry. This time, however, she’s brought an entire movement alongside it.” No doubt his huge number of “fake” followers adored that gibberish.

    Example Troll – @terinalucy1972 (Presumably actually named Lucy Terina)

    The not-so-lovely London based Lucy Terina unsurprisingly backs Brexit and as well as hash-tagging that also adds: #Borisismasterofbrexit. That’s she a big fan of Tommy Robinson leads to only one conclusion about this brazen bigot and that is: “How terribly predictable.”

    Example Troll – @cbouzy (Christopher Bouzy, BotSentinel)

    ‘Blue ticked’ by Twitter in spite of being nothing but a nasty piece of toerag, Christopher Bouzy targets anyone who dares speak out against those he’d love to be more closely involved with – namely the Duchess of Sussex and Amber Heard. He has a past clearly chequered and peppered with questionable episodes. It’s no surprise that one of Ghislaine Maxwell’s favoured mouthpieces, Jay Beecher, associates with him.

  • Moron of the Moment 2022 – Maniac PR Peddler Omid Scobie

    Moron of the Moment 2022 – Maniac PR Peddler Omid Scobie

    In yet again making it all about his anything but sorry self and tittle-tattling about his delusional worries about his personal security, the PR peddler for the Duchess of Sussex that is the maniac Omid Scobie yet again shows himself as nothing but a prized pillock and prat

    Some people make it their life’s work to laud those that do good whilst others make it their life’s work to bring down those that behave improperly. In many ways both sets of people – and some fall into both categories variously – are to be celebrated, but then there are those that simply have to connect anything to their not at all relevant in any way to anything narrative’s to themselves.

     

    Unsurprisingly yet again showing himself as the ultimate example of such yesterday, the rotten-to-his-core PR peddler for the Duchess of Sussex that is the maniac Omid Scobie turned a story about who ought to pay for royal security into a fantasy about his worries about his own personal security.

     

    In a rabid rant for Yahoo! News, the – just like the deranged duchess he so toadily cosies up to – the one-time mate of the glamour model Jodie Marsh whinged and whined and then whimpered:

     

    “I witness a lot myself, too. Thanks to a never-ending stream of false tabloid tales calling me the couple’s ‘close friend’ or ‘spokesman,’ I regularly receive an extension of their online threats. The messages range from extreme racism to disturbingly violent scenes involving the likes of dismemberment, car accidents and rape. They always get forwarded to the police.”

     

    Deservedly called out on many an occasion by amongst others The Steeple Times favourite Sadie Quinlan (AKA ‘Yankee Wally’), the leading apologist for the drippy Duke and Duchess of Sussex revealed earlier this month that he’d be dribbling out more drivel on behalf of the delusional duo in a new book to be published by Harper Collins.

     

    Clearly aimed at countering the deserved hatchet job done by Tom Bower’s Revenge: Meghan, Harry and the War between the Windsors, this as yet untitled tittle-tattling trash, according to its avaricious author, will focus on “a new chapter of the royal story and feature unique insight, deep access and exclusive revelations… [that will] have the world talking.”

     

    Desperate to scavenge anything he can from the car wreck that is the frankly increasingly boring ‘story’ of the modern day ‘Mr and Mrs Wallis Simpson,’ Scobie should (but of course won’t) finally realise one thing: The world’s laughing at this ludicrous arse-licker and not with him and his birdbrained bosses. It’s time all three of them did something else: It’s high time the lot of them bloody well bogged off.

     

    Prince Harry security
    “The safety of others should never be up for debate” pontificated the ‘Finding Freedom’ author whilst sharing his latest bag of bilge. He pompously ended: “Reinstate Harry’s security at his own expense – before it’s too late.” Clearly a crackpot crazy conspiracy theorist, what does this berk expect to happen to the couple he has made a career out of arselicking? A car crash? Murder at the Montecito mansion Manson style? Them eaten alive by a lion?
    In August 2020, the ‘Daily Mail’ shared that plastic-not-fantastic Omid previously worked at gossip magazine ‘Heat’ and partied with the ‘glamour model’ Jodie Marsh. They mentioned how somebody had “airbrushed” Meghan Markle’s “entry on the online encyclopedia Wikipedia… to include more flattering details days before her romance with Prince Harry became public” and illustrated the ‘Finding Freedom’ author’s “drastic transformation” in two very different photographs. Maniac Scobie is someone who most definitely would like his past forgotten, but here again we remind him that he’s actually just a two-faced twerp.
    Fake Followers
    An analysis of maniac Omid Scobie’s Twitter feed clearly shows that a large proportion of his followers are a bit like himself: FAKE.
    Watching
    Illustrating his clearly delusional desperation for attention, the ‘Finding Freedom’ author recently took to Twitter to declare: “Know that if I’m quiet at the moment, it’s because I’m busy writing – (and it feels so nice to be able to finally admit that!)… I’m always watching though.” Who on earth does this blabbering bozo think he is? MI5?
    Richard Eden
    On 4th August, the day the wicked wench formerly known as Meghan Markle turned maybe 41 or maybe 45, the both witty and wise ‘Daily Mail’ diarist Richard Eden tweeted: “Happy birthday to the Duchess of Sussex, who’s 41 today, or as Omid Scobie would put it, 31. #MeghanMarkle.”

    Can anyone solve a problem like ‘MeGain’?

    • In November 2021, the duchess was forced to apologise to the Appeal Court in London for making a misleading statement in her privacy case against The Mail on Sunday’s publishers.
    • Her very own father, Thomas, has called out her many untruths about him and others again, again and again.
    • Of her claiming having got married the day before she actually did, Mr Markle stated: “Lying about the archbishop? How can you say: ‘We’ve been married three days before we got married’? Her lies are so obvious, I don’t know why she says them.”
    • Her very own half-sister, Samantha, who is currently bringing a defamation case against her, has called her out as a liar on multiple occasions also. It has been proven that the duchess’s claim that she hasn’t seen her sibling in over 20 years was proven untrue when a photo of the pair 13 years ago emerged.
    • Her very own half-brother, Thomas Jr., said of her: “I told Prince Harry, I think she’s going to ruin your life. She’s very shallow… She’s a phony, a bully, a jaded, shallow, conceited woman.”
    • The former Meghan Markle has been called out on multiple occasions for spinning stories against other members of the royal family, most especially the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge.
    • Staff who’ve worked for her have complained that she is a bully and investigations into this remain ongoing.
    • The Duchess of Sussex is a known manipulator of the press and paparazzis and it has been claimed that she’ll “twist the truth” to get any headline she wants.
    • Questions remain as to how many times she’s actually been married in total. Some say twice, some say thrice. Any answer to such allegations, ‘MeGain’?
    • Who did this wicked wench meet first? Prince Andrew or Prince Harry?
    • Was the Duchess of Sussex ever associated in any way with Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell in the 2000s and 2010s?
    • What exactly defines the relationship between the Duchess of Sussex and Omid Scobie and Markus Anderson? Is it social, financial or is there something more to it?
    • “Would you trust this woman with a bargepole?” is something often asked of this money motivated minx.

     

  • The Age of ‘MeGain’ – Is The Duchess of Sussex Really 41 Today?

    The Age of ‘MeGain’ – Is The Duchess of Sussex Really 41 Today?

    As the Duchess of Sussex supposedly turns 41, pundits question whether this is yet another example of her “convenient truths” and suggest she could actually be now aged 45

    Today marks, if you believe her nonsensical narrative, the 41st birthday of the Duchess of Sussex. Today, if you don’t believe her narrative and side with her estranged sister Samantha, it is actually the wicked woman formerly known as Meghan Markle’s 45th birthday.

     

    Described as “having a very conflicted relationship with the truth” on many matters on Quora and accused again this week by crusading author Kirby Sommers of having met Prince Andrew and his since croaked paedophile mates Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell prior to hooking up with Prince Harry, here is a woman whose age is estimated as high as 46 – five years older than she herself claims.

     

    Accused also of having “fabricated past stories to bolster her career as an actress,” the now wife of Prince Harry’s claimed, aged 13 at the time, that she kissed a boy also aged 13 when they both attended a summer camp in Santa Monica. Given, that ‘boy,’ “honour winning entertainer and author” Joshua Silverstein, is listed as having been born in 1977, that would make the pair of them 45 and most certainly not 41.

     

    Today, as some wish her a happy birthday and others wish she’d just disappear forever into obscurity, it is time for some answers. Come on alleged ‘yacht girl’ Meghan, it’s time for the truth; how old, actually, are you?

     

    Today on Twitter, Matthew Steeples asked: “Do you believe the woman formerly known as Meghan Markle is turning 41 today or do you believe her estranged sisters and others who suggest she might actually be turning 45?” The overwhelming response thus far suggests that the Twitterati believe the Duchess of Sussex to be telling porky pies about her real age.
    Samantha Markle and sister Meghan
    Samantha Markle was supposedly born on Tuesday 24th November 1964, which makes her 57 years, 8 months old. Her sister, she has claimed in legal documents is 13 years older than her, which would make her 45 years old and born in 1977 and not 41 and born in 1981 as she has claimed.
    Centre of attention 1
    At a time when the Queen has lost her husband and suffered the indignity of the embarrassment caused by her second son ‘Randy Andy’s’ antics with the likes of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, the attention seeking ways of Prince Charles’s second son and his trashbag American wife are not exactly helpful.
    Speculation
    Quora users have long speculated about and questioned the date of birth of the daughter of Thomas Markle and Dora Ragland. They, frankly, simply do not believe her suggestion of having been born on the 4th August 1981.
    Centre of attention 2
    Whatever the situation and whomever she is with, here is anything but camera shy woman who has to make utterly everything about herself.

    Can anyone solve a problem like ‘MeGain’?

    • What year was Meghan Markle actually born in? Is she 41 and born in 1981 or is she 45 and born in 1977 as has variously been claimed?
    • In November 2021, the duchess was forced to apologise to the Appeal Court in London for making a misleading statement in her privacy case against The Mail on Sunday’s publishers.
    • Her very own father, Thomas, has called out her many untruths about him and others again, again and again.
    • Of her claiming having got married the day before she actually did, Mr Markle stated: “Lying about the archbishop? How can you say: ‘We’ve been married three days before we got married’? Her lies are so obvious, I don’t know why she says them.”
    • Her very own half-sister, Samantha, who is currently bringing a defamation case against her, has called her out as a liar on multiple occasions also. It has been proven that the duchess’s claim that she hasn’t seen her sibling in over 20 years was proven untrue when a photo of the pair 13 years ago emerged.
    • Her very own half-brother, Thomas Jr., said of her: “I told Prince Harry, I think she’s going to ruin your life. She’s very shallow… She’s a phony, a bully, a jaded, shallow, conceited woman.”
    • The former Meghan Markle has been called out on multiple occasions for spinning stories against other members of the royal family, most especially the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge.
    • Staff who’ve worked for her have complained that she is a bully and investigations into this remain ongoing.
    • The Duchess of Sussex is a known manipulator of the press and paparazzis and it has been claimed that she’ll “twist the truth” to get any headline she wants.
    • Questions remain as to how many times she’s actually been married in total. Some say twice, some say thrice.
    • “Would you trust this woman with a bargepole?” is something often asked of this money motivated minx.
    National Enquirer
    Speculation about the former actress having had “hook-ups” with Matt Lauer have been doing the rounds. The former NBC news personality had his contract terminated with NBC in November 2017 after it was revealed he’d been into all sorts of sexual inappropriate behaviour in the workplace.
    Globe
    “Humiliated” Prince Harry’s wife has been accused also of being his “puppet master” and “destroying” him. His friends are said to have “blasted” her for taking him away from them and isolating him in their Montecito mansion.
    Tanya Gold on Meghan Markle
    In 2019, tedious twerp and ‘Unherd’ contributor Tanya Gold got the Duchess of Sussex completely wrong when she wrote in the ‘New York Times’: “Why does Meghan have the press in such paroxysms? Well, she is an interloper: divorced, American, biracial and, apparently, progressive. And she dares not only to inhabit the role of duchess but also to make it her own. Still, her critics – energized by their racism, misogyny and snobbery – can relax. She is not a revolutionary socialist, nor a convincing human rights activist who destroy everything they love. She will not bring down the royal family. In 2019, she is precisely what it needs.” Oxford educated (but Oxford hating), former alcoholic Tanya clearly ought to stick to other topics – she’s best known, after all, for also bigging-up the late paedophile Jimmy Savile as a “national treasure” and “enabling Savilisation.”
  • Dershowitz Ditched – Larry David Snubs Alan Dershowitz

    Dershowitz Ditched – Larry David Snubs Alan Dershowitz

    As he faces a court showdown with Virginia Roberts Giuffre, Ghislaine Maxwell apologist Alan Dershowitz gets deservedly snubbed by his now former friend Larry David

    Seinfeld and Curb Your Enthusiasm star Larry David was rightly lauded after calling out the lawyer and Ghislaine Maxwell apologist Alan Dershowitz as “disgusting” last week after “bumping into him at a grocery store in Martha’s vineyard.”

     

    In an interview by telephone with Isaac Chotiner – published in The New Yorker on Tuesday 19th July – the emeritus professor of law at Harvard declared he had been “cancelled” for “daring to defend” Donald Trump and stated of his encounter with David:

     

    “What happened is – it’s interesting because I was having lunch with a very radical lawyer who loves me. I mean, he disagrees with me. We argue all the time, but he is not part of the Chilmark crowd. So I was having lunch with him and then a number of other people were there. Suddenly, Larry David walks in to buy some groceries. I say, ‘Hey. Hi, Larry,’ and he turns away, and he just walks away. I say, ‘Larry, can’t we at least talk?’ He said, ‘No. You’re disgusting.’”

     

    “He said, ‘I saw you pat Mike Pompeo on the back.’ It’s true. I did. Here’s the story. It was the Abraham Accords, or the movement toward peace in Israel under the Trump Administration, which I played a central role in.”

     

    He said, ‘I saw you pat Mike Pompeo on the back.’ It’s true. I did. Here’s the story. It was the Abraham Accords, or the movement toward peace in Israel under the Trump Administration, which I played a central role in.”

     

    Asked if he’d watch Curb Your Enthusiasm again, the leading Ghislaine Maxwell apologist curtly responded:

     

    “No. Because I know that the Larry David that’s in Curb Your Enthusiasm is not a fictional character. He’s the real Larry David… If you know that he’s the real Larry David, that curmudgeon, the nasty guy.”

     

    Elsewhere last week, Virginia Roberts Giuffre – whom accuses Dershowitz of sexually abusing her on at least 6 occasions and claims him to be “engaging in revisionist history” – revealed that she is seeking a date of March 2023 for their defamation. The lawyer and retired Harvard professor has previously claimed to have never met the woman Prince Andrew paid £12 million to in spite of also claiming to have never her and has also called her a “certified, complete, total liar.”

     

    Pictured top – Comedian and actor Larry David in a ‘Make America Great Again’ baseball cap (left) and lawyer Alan Dershowitz enjoying a giggle with the late croaked paedophile Jeffrey Epstein (right).

     

    BBC
    The BBC was rightly forced to apologise for giving the loudmouth lawyer airtime in December 2021 after Ghislaine Maxwell’s conviction in New York. On Twitter, their press team declared giving the lawyer the opportunity to speak “did not meet the BBC’s editorial standards.” They added that they subsequently realized that he “was not a suitable person to interview as an impartial analyst, and we did not make the relevant background clear to our audience.” They concluded: “We will look into how this happened” yet unsurprisingly no heads subsequently rolled.
    Harvard
    Dershowitz and Epstein pictured together at a Harvard event. The pair liked to portray themselves as sophisticated, but frankly both of them have ended up as being portrayed as grasping, grubby gropers. Of the latter, the former told the ‘Miami Herald’ in June: “Everybody missed it. My wife and I never saw young girls at that house. There was never a young girl in that house. There was never a picture of a young girl in that house. There were pictures of [former President Bill] Clinton, and other prominent people.” Of Virginia Roberts Giuffre, he added: “I want all the $20 million [in civil settlements] she’s gotten to be taken away from her and given to the real victims,” Dershowitz said. “Which I will do. I want her to go to prison for committing massive perjury. This case will never be over until Virginia Giuffre pays the price for her false accusations.”
    Red wine
    Dershowitz (left) drinking red wine with Epstein (centre) and former Treasury Secretary and later Harvard President Lawrence Summers (right) at a Harvard sponsored event on 9th September 2004 in Cambridge, Massachusetts.
    Virginia Roberts Giuffre
    At the likely March 2023 trial, lawyers for Roberts Giuffre (pictured above) intend to call in-person witnesses (aside from herself) including David Boies, Sigrid McCawley, Brad Edwards, Paul Cassell, David Stone and Epstein’s first known British victim, Anouska de Georgiou.
    Alan Dershowitz was played by Ron Silver in the 1990 American drama film ‘Reversal of Fortune’ with Jeremy Irons as Claus von Bülow and Glenn Close as Sunny von Bülow. The 111-minute film grossed £12.3 million at the box office and was lauded for its “exceptional performances” and “cunning script.”
  • Not So Arresting Andy – Prince Andrew Could Be Next FBI Arrest Target

    Not So Arresting Andy – Prince Andrew Could Be Next FBI Arrest Target

    As mendacious mucky madam Ghislaine Maxwell is set to rot in the clink for 20 years, her mouthy mucker mate Prince Andrew may be arrested by the FBI

    The non-sweating nosebag nosher who paid £12 million to a woman he supposedly never met Prince Andrew may never be able to set foot on American soil again.

     

    The Duke of York – whose coffin dodging chum Bernie Ecclestone again shoved his hooves in the proverbial yesterday by again senselessly claiming he’d “take a bullet for Putin” – is, the New York Post revealed, to be targeted by lawyers for victims of his late croaked paedophile bestie, Jeffrey Epstein, and his now incarcerated co-collaborator and convicted sex offender, Ghislaine Maxwell.

     

    Of this juicy development for the non-sweating “favourite” son of the Queen, Spencer Kuvin, a lawyer for several of the victims of Epstein and Maxwell, told the Mirror: “Obviously, Andrew is one of the targets they will be looking into. He should definitely be concerned, but, if he did nothing wrong, then come forward and tell the full story to the FBI, not the media.”

     

    The paper’s United States editor Christopher Bucktin observed: “Mr Kuvin named other targets, which included another Briton” and going further the lawyer who secured Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s out-of-court settlement with the royal, Brad Edwards, stated: “Let’s hope they’re the next target. If we have anything to do with it, they will be.”

     

    Speaking to The Sun subsequently, Kuvin surmised: “Anyone who took advantage of a minor as a result of being provided that minor by Mr Epstein or Ms Maxwell should be prosecuted as well.”

     

    “It is highly unlikely an extradition would ever occur, so the Prince would have to be here in the US and be arrested while he’s here.”

     

    “Tell Prince Andrew he should spend the summer here in the US. Come on over to vacation.”

     

    Contrasting elsewhere and yet again sticking her oar in where it is not wanted, Lady Victoria Hervey has been doing the rounds with appearances on Channel 5 News and GB News to again claim the 2001 photograph of the then Miss Roberts and Prince Andrew at Ghislaine Maxwell’s then Belgravia home to be a fake.

     

    Speaking to the Daily Mail’s Richard Eden this morning, the aristocrat laughably concluded: “It’s so sad what’s happened to Andrew.”

     

    In other news on Friday in ‘The Sun,’ the prince was slammed by Paul Page, a Buckingham Palace armed protection officer in the 1990s and 2000s. He observed: “He’s a self-absorbed, obnoxious, horrible little man who is disrespectful to those below him… Andrew has something to hide and he has questions to answer – but I don’t think he will ever be in a position where he will have to answer them because of who he is. He’s got the ‘HRH’ title in front of his name, Ghislaine hasn’t – where is she? Jail. Where is he? At home. Simple as that.” Speaking previously of the relationship between his former boss and Ghislaine Maxwell, the former police officer stated: “From the way she was allowed to enter and exit the palace, at will, we realised… suspected, that she may have had an intimate relationship with Prince Andrew. A colleague of mine remembered her coming in four times in one day from the morning till the evening – she kept coming in and out, in and out.”
    Twitter users called for the FBI to go after ‘Randy Andy’ with one remarking: “WHY should Prince Andrew be allowed to avoid prosecution? By paying the women he allegedly abused, he’s admitted guilt. I hope the FBI keep chasing him down.” Another added: “If Ghislaine Maxwell was a British Princess and Prince Andrew was just a ‘socialite,’ Ghislaine would be walking free right now and Andrew would be spending 20 years in prison. Being royalty is a Get Out of Jail Free card.”
    44 Kinnerton Street 10th March 2001
    Whilst Lady Victoria Hervey may peddle her belief that the photograph taken of Prince Andrew, the then Virginia Roberts and Ghislaine Maxwell at 44 Kinnerton Street, Belgravia, London, SW1 on the evening of the 10th March 2001 is a fake, others including the photographer who photographed the original photograph in 2011, New Zealander Michael Thomas, takes an entirely different view. Speaking to the ‘New Zealand Herald’ in February, Thomas remarked: “As I have said before, it was just an ordinary photo you would have got from a chemist in the days of negatives. Surely, if it was fake, every media outlet in the world would be getting sued for using it. The fact that isn’t happening, to me says everything.” Of the image, previously in 2019, Thomas commented: “It wasn’t like she pulled the photo of Prince Andrew out, it was just in among the rest of them. They were just typical teenage snaps. There’s no way that photo is fake.”
  • Scobie’s Childish Clownery Backfires

    Scobie’s Childish Clownery Backfires

    MeGain’s nodding dog PR peddler Omid Scobie claims “clownery” forced him to delete a tweet deemed by many “hateful” to a 4-year-old child, Prince Louis

    After beginning his stint at Yahoo! News with a nonsensical “800-word rant” in May, the plastic-not-fantastic ‘Megamouthed Montecito Meddler’ that is Omid Scobie twisted his already leaky pen again last week with a feature titled: “Thomas Markle turned on his own daughter – Meghan owes him nothing.”

     

    As ever, shockingly written and peppered with his trademark use of “snark” and “toxic,” the ‘author’ of the bag of bilge that is Finding Freedom concluded of “publicity-hungry” Mr Markle: “Meghan doesn’t owe him a damn thing” after effectively suggesting that Prince Harry’s wife for now’s father was “conveniently captured” by paparazzi as he arrived at a California hospital after having a stroke.

     

    Aside from being unnecessarily insulting to a clearly unwell man – who he alleged also tells “twisted tales” and has supported “single-purpose-hate accounts about his daughter” – Scobie simply showed himself as ridiculous. Going further, this PR peddler continued in the same vein and yesterday in a tweet about the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge’s son, Prince Louis, again made a total prat of himself.

     

    Later deleted after he was widely condemned for picking on a 4-year-old child, accompanying an image of the clearly nothing but playful youngster, Scobie wrote: “I did wonder why Prince Louis was taken out for a while. Kids will be kids, eh?”

     

    Obviously a pointed jibe that aimed at hinting that the behaviour of the children of the House of Cambridge and the parenting skills of the heir to the throne and his wife are looked on differently to those of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, Scobie was subsequently asked: “Why did you delete your tweet?”

     

    His response – called out as “crying victim” – read: “Because despite turning off comments (something I now try to do on any tweet about royal children), there was negativity in the quote tweets and also some insane trolls claiming ‘kids will be kids, eh?’ is ‘inciting hate.’ I’m tired and have no time or patience for clownery.”

     

    Predictably once again here is a circa 40-year-old mouthy-mouse-not-a-man who throws his toys out of the pram when criticised; equally, shown up by a 4-year-old child, here is a proof that Scobie likes to give it out but he most certainly has again proven he can’t take it back. This gobby gadabout ought to learn to think before he tweets and leave commentary to real journalists and grownups.

     

    OS Tweet 1
    This tweet by the ‘Finding Freedom’ lasted less than a couple of hours. It was widely condemned as a “pointed jibe” and “offensive” and some went as far as to say it simply showed this PR peddler for the ‘House of Montecito’ to be a nasty piece of toerag and a pot stirring troublemaker.
    OS Tweet 2
    Asked why he deleted the missive, pathetic pontificater Scobie threw his toys out of the pram and declared: “I’m tired and have no time or patience for clownery.” In doing so, he simply illustrated himself to be anything but thoughtful in his communications and skilled at nothing but drawing attention to himself by any means.
    Response 1
    “Crying victim,” however, did not work out well for him and instead other Twitter users remarked of their view that he is the one “enabling hate” and “encouraging hate online against children.” He would have been wise not to have embarked on such a course of action in the first place, but having done so, his back peddling proved even more disastrous.
    Richard Eden
    The ‘Daily Mail’s’ Richard Eden responded to last week’s ‘Yahoo! News’ article by suggesting that it is “the royal family [who owe] Meghan nothing” rather than her owing her father nothing.
    OS Tweet 3
    Bragging about his article on 31st May on Twitter, the former ‘Heat’ magazine columnist and sometime mate of the titty flashing ‘glamour model’ Jodie Marsh called out the Duchess of Sussex’s father as a “toxic parent” who “has a long history of causing stress, anxiety and pain.” He argued: “Cutting them out is often the only answer” in spite of having no known knowledge of psychology.
  • Meg & Amber – A Pugnacious Pair Of Woke Wazzocks Who Should Be Heard Less

    Meg & Amber – A Pugnacious Pair Of Woke Wazzocks Who Should Be Heard Less

    Both blubbing bed sh*tter Amber Heard and boring botherer the Duchess of Sussex should be heard less and ignored more; it is time to cancel these woke wazzocks

    Audacious and awful Amber Heard is an actress and so used to be the wicked wench formerly known as Meghan Markle. Here, indeed, is a pair who are very similar and in both of them this week we’ve seen yet more shameless attention seeking.

     

    Whilst Johnny Depp’s clearly crackers ex blubbed in court and was made an utter berk of by Kate Moss over her clear lies, that the Duchess of Sussex decided to visit a town in Texas she has utterly no connection with is just plain wrong.

     

    The grieving families of those so disgustingly shot by a deranged madman do not need or require a visit from a woman who forced her husband to quit his royal duties to seek privacy. Her presence, instead, was nothing but wrong in all senses and that she turned up to profiteer with her camera crew in tow was beyond reprehensible.

     

    The Duke and Duchess of Sussex might believe Netflix’s cash to be their future; it will soon be their deserved undoing. Shame on them and shame on bed sh*tter Amber Heard also.

     

    Duchess of Sussex Netflix
    The deranged diva’s decision to use a tragedy for her own PR purposes was rightly slammed on social media. That she stood looking over photographers sums up how self-serving this dreadful toerag truly is.
    Meghan Markle
    If the Duchess of Sussex had wished to support the families of the victims of the Uvalde shootings, she could have sent a donation. Instead, she used this tragedy for her very own benefit. Shame on her.
    Johnny Depp
    Meanwhile elsewhere in the Fairfax County Courthouse in Virginia, Johnny Depp looked on as his ex-lover Kate Moss proved Amber Heard nothing but a loopy liar yesterday.

    Can anyone solve a problem like ‘MeGain’?

    • In November 2021, the duchess was forced to apologise to the Appeal Court in London for making a misleading statement in her privacy case against The Mail on Sunday’s publishers.
    • Her very own father, Thomas, has called out her many untruths about him and others again, again and again.
    • Of her claiming having got married the day before she actually did, Mr Markle stated: “Lying about the archbishop? How can you say: ‘We’ve been married three days before we got married’? Her lies are so obvious, I don’t know why she says them.”
    • Her very own half-sister, Samantha, has called her out as a liar on multiple occasions also. It has been proven that the duchess’s claim that she hasn’t seen her sibling in over 20 years was proven untrue when a photo of the pair 13 years ago emerged.
    • Her very own half-brother, Thomas Jr., said of her: “I told Prince Harry, I think she’s going to ruin your life. She’s very shallow… She’s a phony, a bully, a jaded, shallow, conceited woman.”
    • The former Meghan Markle has been called out on multiple occasions for spinning stories against other members of the royal family, most especially the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge.
    • Staff who’ve worked for her have complained that she is a bully and investigations into this remain ongoing.
    • The Duchess of Sussex is a known manipulator of the press and paparazzis and it has been claimed that she’ll “twist the truth” to get any headline she wants.
    • Questions remain as to how many times she’s actually been married in total. Some say twice, some say thrice.
    • “Would you trust this woman with a bargepole?” is something often asked of this money motivated minx.

     

    ‘Buzzfeed’ botherer Ellie Hall claimed a “scoop” on the story of the mendacious meddling minx that is the decided drip Prince Harry’s wicked wastrel wife visiting the scene of a massacre. She announced: “SCOOP: Meghan, the Duchess of Sussex, traveled to Uvalde, Texas, where she donated food to a community blood drive center and visited a memorial for the victims of the deadly school shooting.”
    Piers Morgan rightly said of the “self-promoting” visit: “I don’t know why she’s there?”
  • Restraining Poundland Pikey Pricey 2022 – Katie Price Faces Jail

    Restraining Poundland Pikey Pricey 2022 – Katie Price Faces Jail

    As Katie Price is finally forced to face the prospect of jail for breaching a restraining order, we suggest it is time this “gutter slag” grew up

    ‘Poundland Pikey’ Katie Price likes to call other women “gutter slags.” She, in fact, is one herself and now faced with jail for breaching a restraint order, this bombastic braindead bird may finally be taught a clearly very necessary behavioural lesson.

     

    ‘Five by Three’ Miss Price – a 44-year-old mother of five children by three dads – was arrested in January for breaching a restraining order and previously has been charged with drink driving and described as having “one of the worst driving records ever seen.”

     

    Associated mostly now with the words “troubled” and “trash,” this boozed-up binbag has at least 21 offences linked to her name and is likely “at risk of receiving an immediate custodial sentence” once sentencing occurs next month. She has been rightly labelled “nasty” and “vile” and her “foul mouthed tirades of abuse” are frankly what she’ll ultimately only be remembered for.

     

    Aside from speeding offences, flipping a car whilst drunk and ignoring letters from the police, this plastic-not-fantastic wench has repeatedly stuck her plastic-not-fantastic fingers up to the law now on one occasion too many. It is time for Katie Price to be locked up and locked up not only for the safety of others; it is time that Katie Price is given a dose of gruel and reminded that she ought not be considered above the law.

     

    Carl Woods
    Katie Price arriving at Lewes Crown Court with her fiancé Carl Woods on Wednesday.
    Drunk 1
    Social media users reacted to the anything but glamorous ‘glamour model’s’ current situation by demanding she be “jailed for her own good” after her latest court appearance over calling her ex-husband’s fiancée a “gutter slag.” One Twitter user remarked: “She’s had more than enough chances to stop her destructive behaviour. I feel sorry for her kids.”
    Drunk 2
    After pleading guilty, Judge Stephen Mooney told the mouthy mother of five: “Clearly you have accepted for an offence and pleaded guilty and you are aware you committed the offence while on a suspended sentence and are at risk of going to prison.”
    Mucky Mansion
    In 2012, we were somewhat more charitable about “mucky mansion” dwelling Miss Price in remarking: “This glamour model is to be commended for having made a fortune. Her taste in men and cars however is utterly lacking. Her pink Range Rover is perhaps symbolic of all that is wrong about her.” In the time since, this British Pounland equivalent of Paris Hilton has sadly morphed into a reprehensible ratbag and turned her life into a trash can of sleaze and sordidness. One has to pity her poor children for being forced to put up with a succession of trashy men and their messed up mother’s frankly revolting antics.

    Twitter reacts to the Brighton born ‘Page 3 Girl’s’ latest travails:

    Twitter 1
    Twitter user Reece Sanford labelled the ‘Five by Three’ a “vile slapper” and asked: “Is this vile slapper just allowed to get away with anything?”
    Twitter 2
    Another account pointed to Carl Woods’s Mercedes-Benz G-Wagen having illegal front window tinting. They could also have remarked on his ghastly outfit and his hideous barnet.
    Twitter 3
    Twitter user ‘Tommy H’ demanded that this serial offender ends up in prison and suggested: “This woman seems to do whatever the f**k she wants.”
    Twitter 4
    Another, Tessa Rose surmised: “9 driving offences, 6 driving bans and still driving illegal. Not to mention restraining order and her stint in rehab.” She added: “As she repeatedly keeps driving without a licence, she’s not remorseful and won’t ever learn.”
    Twitter 5
    ‘Eric Eats Pickles’ raged: “Does she have to kill someone to get banned?” and added: “One of the worst driving records I have ever seen.” We could add: “Wouldn’t it have been cheaper and more sensible for this silly bint to have just employed a chauffeur?”
  • The Montecito Meddler – Omid Scobie Strikes Again

    The Montecito Meddler – Omid Scobie Strikes Again

    As PR peddler for the ‘House of Montecito’ Omid Scobie again “rants” about the royals, all this one-time mate of the not so glamorous glamour model Jodie Marsh does is show himself up

    “Whether you are a royalist or not, Her Majesty deserves better than this” droned the pugnaciously predictable PR-peddler-not-a-credible-journalist Omid Scobie in what has been branded an “800-word rant” by The Daily Express’s Jon King.

     

    Peppered with quotes from unnamed sources – who could, quite frankly, very easily be invented – the mendacious minx formerly known as Meghan Markle’s personal scribbler and ‘friend,’ as always, referenced himself to be something of an expert on the royal “beat” in a feature for the decidedly out-of-date Yahoo! News. He made out that those making a “fuss” about the Duke and Duchess of Sussex not appearing on Buckingham Palace’s balcony during next month’s Platinum Jubilee have got it wrong and suggested the real reason is to “keep a certain disgraced royal [Prince Andrew] at bay.”

     

    “Makes sense to me” added Scobie – who also remarked of “pot-stirring polls” about people threatening to boo the drip that is Prince Harry and his ‘Modern Day Mrs Simpson’ wife and pointedly stated: “I suppose his recent multi-million settlement with a woman accusing him of sexually assaulting her at 17 years old is nothing compared to the audacity of two people who moved abroad” – before he declared: “It’s the sections of media hellbent on joyriding the focus towards soap opera-style drama and embellished tales.”

     

    Perhaps, instead, this one-time sidekick of the not so glamorous glamour model Jodie Marsh – a plastic not fantastic creosoted creature who once declared she wanted to get married in a fetish ceremony in a dungeon – should take a look in the mirror. It is his tittle-tattling tome, Finding Freedom, that is the book that will go down in history as nothing but “embellished tales” and it is avoiding the damage that the nonsense he spins that the Queen “deserves better than this” of instead.

     

    Pictured top (from left to right) – The Duchess of Sussex back in her days as a lowbrow actress in ‘Suits’ in a clinch with ‘co-star’ Patrick J. Adams; boob exposing ‘glamour model’ Jodie Marsh and PR peddling pillock Omid Scobie.

     

    Jodie Marsh
    Like his puppet mistress the Duchess of Sussex, the ‘Finding Freedom’ co-author is not keen for anyone to know his past. His days hanging around in lowbrow nightclubs with glamour models will, however, forever haunt this anything but a genuine journalist. Instead this peddler of poison about good people, such as Sadie Quinlan (AKA ‘Yankee Wally’), are what Omid Scobie will rightly be remembered for. Shame on him.
    Finding Freedom
    ‘Finding Freedom’ will not be remembered for its accuracy. It will, instead, be listed as a bargain bucket bag of bilge that represented nothing but a clear attack on the actual hardworking, dedicated members of the royal family.
    Meghan Markle naked
    Whilst Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II will forever be lauded as a wonderful lady of style, substance and service, the Duchess of Sussex will simply be remembered as a ‘Modern Day Mrs Simpson’ who cares only about money, fame and power. This decidedly deviant diva has turned her pathetic husband into a drip and she has made herself nothing but an international laughing stock. Her treatment of others –most especially her father and siblings – has been nothing but shocking and her audacity has been simply beyond the pale.
    The fact that people make videos titled “Omid Scobie freaks me out!” about says it all of this tedious tittle-tattling twerp. Here is a megamouth-not-a-man who does not follow the journalistic code of citing stories with evidence. Here instead is a feckless fool who likes to reference sources unnamed and in doing so just thus proves himself to be nothing but a galavanting gossiper. If anyone truly deserves “cancelling,” here is the very finest example available currently.