The appointment of the PR peddling pillock Omid Scobie to ‘Royal Executive Editor’ at ‘Yahoo! News’ is just yet another own goal by the wicked wench formerly known as Meghan Markle; it is time this sop was simply told to “sod off!”
Self-anointed know-all Omid Scobie is rather like his nickname ‘Scabies’ in that he has become an infestation that burrows into the skin and has caused an irritating rash to form. He is unwelcome everywhere and that he’s set his troll squad on everyone from the Daily Mail’sRichard Eden to the wonderful Welsh warbling YouTuber Sadie Quinlan (AKA ‘Yankee Wally’) simply reflects his own rotten-to-his-core persona.
This pointless PR peddler and anything but a genuine journalist has long been known more simply as a tin banger for the Duchess of Sussex and her moaning drip of a husband. Now, however, with his ‘elevation’ to becoming the “Royal Executive Editor” (in capitals, of course) for Yahoo! News just gives this windbag wazzock another space in which to whinge and whine.
A former hanger-out in naff nightclubs with the lowbrow ‘glamour model’ that is Jodie Marsh in his days at the equally lowbrow Heat gossip magazine in days past, Scobie used his first column for Yahoo! News to have a pop at everyone in the royal family except the money motivated minx who uses him like a puppet.
In his first “5-minute read” for the online only title – which frankly if produced in printed form wouldn’t even make tomorrow’s chip papers – the Sussex Squaddie chieftan’s continual references to such things as “pearl clutching,” “faux outrage” and “hysteria” about the Sussexes “on the royal beat” simply prove that he is anything but capable of making a rational or indeed reasoned analysis.
Never known to have produced an unbiased story about the mistress he is so devoted to, Scobie ludicrously claims in his ‘article’ that Prince Harry’s vicious attack on his grandmother’s staff “had everyone (including Downing Street) rushing for the smelling salts” and laughably added: “As someone who got closest to the story of Harry’s royal departure, it was certainly not my first thought.”
Firstly, not many would consider Scobie a “thinking man” and secondly, it wasn’t this potless prick that clenched an interview with the royal rotters that are the ‘Modern Day Mr & Mrs Simpson.’ Did they go running to him when they wanted to give an interview? No, they most certainly did not and “why was this?” some might ask. Well, given the woman formerly known as Meghan Markle is utterly money motivated, with Scobie, where, indeed, is the money?
Pitching himself as on a par with Oprah Winfrey is certainly laughable, but in claiming his “I remember how my jaw dropped when a friend of the couple gave me a play-by-play account of how the Queen’s private secretary, Edward Young, went out of his way to prevent the couple from visiting the monarch in Sandringham,” this wannabe and anything but jovial jester to the court of ‘MeGain’ simply shows himself as deranged and delusional.
Going further, in saying “inside the institution of the monarchy is an environment where mental health and wellbeing is not prioritised,” this ‘woke warrior’ is only attempting to draw himself and to promote his bargain-bucket, bag-of-bilge ‘book’ Finding Freedom.
Tellingly, this totally biased ‘article’ ends with a pointed attack on the royal family with the words: “When you look at the famously unsympathetic institution the Queen lives within, Harry has every reason to worry” and then a very relevant sentence: “Buckingham Palace declined to comment to Yahoo News UK.” Miaow.
Scobie, like scabies, should learn that he’s not wanted; it’s now time for him to simply sod off.
Pictured top – The new “Royal Executive Editor” (left) and the woman who is his puppet mistress with the drip that is her husband, the Duchess of Sussex (right).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qF50LFyJHTA
In other equally vicious comments, ‘Scabies’ shamelessly had a pop at the Queen’s much-loved dresser on behalf of his mistress. He ridiculously remarked: “Angela Kelly, who multiple sources told me made it almost impossible for Meghan to have a necessary ‘hair trial’ with her chosen wedding tiara – even standing up the duchess-to-be and her hairstylist, who had flown in especially, at a pre-scheduled fitting. Harry, sources said, felt it was a cruel attempt to put his partner ‘in her place.’” This is not journalism, it is simply gossip reported by a ghastly guffawing goon.The ‘Finding Freedom’ author’s attacks on amongst others ‘Yankee Wally’ are indicative only of a moronic meddler determined to get attention for himself. Here is a mouth-not-a-man who’ll do anything to keep himself in the favour of the mendacious minx from Montecito.Attacking everyone in the royal family other than his meal ticket that consists only of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex is the only way for this buffoon to continue to get media moments.Aiding this anything but impartial prat on social media are trolls including ‘Unstoppable-Chi’ and ‘Gin Perdide.’ These ‘people’ and the likes of the Bot Sentinel bore that is Christopher Bouzy are vicious and vile.
Why Prince Harry has every reason to ask questions about the people around the Queen
The self-serving, plastic-not-fantastic PR peddler bragged about his new gig on Twitter and shared his first ludicrous headline: “Why Prince Harry has every reason to ask questions about the people around the Queen” with his 82,600 followers. In another tweet, the cretinous creep added: “Excited to start a new content partnership with Yahoo! News, one of the world’s most read outlets. As Executive Royal Editor, I’ll be working with @YahooNewsUK on original podcasting, video content, and giving my unfiltered take on the big royal stories every week. Let’s go!” Most would be delighted if he’d indeed: “Just go!”
In constantly referencing the Duchess of Sussex as “Duchess Meghan,” PR peddler and arse-licker Omid Scobie proves himself anything but an expert on royalty, titles, honours and protocol
If you’d believe the twaddle on his Twitter handle, Omid Scobie is supposedly some kind of expert on all things royal. Here is someone who shares “positive vibes only” – please pass the sick bag – and laughably claims to be a “bestselling author.”
If you then turn to reality, you’ll find – as Nikolay Kalinin revealed on these pages in July 2021 – Omid Scobie is in fact instead a pompous prattler who used to hang out with ‘glamour models’ such as Jodie Marsh. He’s anything but a real journalist and is in fact nothing but a wannabe spin doctor whose Twitter following is composed of at least 25% fake accounts.
Botoxed to a point that he actually looks rather like the wench formerly known as Meghan Markle, Scobie is what one might call a ‘groupie’ and in constantly referencing Prince Charles’ second son’s wife as “Duchess Meghan,” he attempts to show familiarity and kinship with the former actress. He is, however, completely wrong and whatever one might wish to call the mendacious minx who may have been married twice or may have been married three times perhaps, it’s most certainly not “Duchess Meghan.”
Whilst it must be remembered that the Duchess of Sussex – as she unfortunately is still correctly known in spite of her and her husband having renounced any kind of royal responsibilities – was forced to apologise over her cooperation with Scobie at the Appeal Court in London in November 2021, the co-author of the bargain bin confined Finding Freedom does, like her also, like to cause a ruckus at any opportunity.
Faced with losing his own company, Meyou Limited, right now after failing to keep his accounts up to date, it is time for Scobie to also realise that the Duchess of Sussex – who also retains the titles of Her Royal Highness (not used in practice, but kept in style), Countess of Dumbarton and Baroness Kilkeel – is simply NOT and never will be called “Duchess Meghan.” Lexical semantics do matter and it is time that this tedious twerp was taught just such.
The overtly ambitious and clearly arrogant Duchess of Sussex has unsurprisingly been called out over her supposedly rude behaviour and alleged bullying of staff in many quarters. Unsurprisingly, her chief cheerleader Omid Scobie has little to no interest in highlighting that and only spreads the poison his favourite American wishes to put out there.Dan Wootton shared his mirth about Scobie’s use of “Duchess Meghan” on Friday and remarked: “Give it up, mate.”Perez Hilton added: “Why refer to her as Duchess Meghan? Meghan Markle and Harry walked away from that life.”Twitter users got in on the use of correct titles on Friday. One going by the name of Mrs Frensham rightly responded: “Get with the programme please.”Another account, Line of Succession, rightly concluded: “Do you mean the Duke and Duchess of Sussex? Why can’t journalists ever get royal titles right?”Returning to criticism of Scobie, a “Cambridge fan” going by the name of Scarfie, observed: “Cracks me up when you read “positive vibes only!” In his bio… then read his comment section. Not to mention his snarky tweets.”Responding to a discussion about the best and worst things about Twitter orchestrated by Michael Sayman, a “product lead” at Twitter, a user named Amanda observed that she enjoys “talking to people from all over the world” but viewed the presence of the Bot Sentinel bore Christopher Bouzy and his cohort Omid Scobie to be her “least favourite” things on the medium.The ‘Finding Freedom’ co-author often bangs on about “hate speech” and “abuse” online and constantly carps about those that have the audacity to have a differing opinion to his own. This pathetic specimen likes to give it out, but he simply cannot cope with a little bit of stick himself.Twitter user Gill B. twisted the conversation back to logic and reminded the PR peddler: “You will be pleased to learn that Yankee Wally is now a Royal Reporter, having been signed by Sobel Promotions, and will be broadcasting to millions worldwide on Rainbow Radio FM. You and Bouzy have given her a louder voice! Well done!”
Matthew Steeples slams the vindictive campaign against YouTube sensation Sadie Quinlan – known as ‘Yankee Wally’ – by the mendacious ‘Sussex Squad’ groupies led by PR peddlers Omid Scobie and Christopher Bouzy and helped along by a bashful ‘BuzzFeed News’ busybody named Ellie Hall
The Duchess of Sussex has an inconvenient past she’d most certainly rather forget; her nemesis Sadie Quinlan (AKA ‘Yankee Wally’) has just such too.
Now, after a busybody Washington, D.C. based ‘senior reporter’ for BuzzFeed News named Ellie Hall last week produced a somewhat lacklustre ‘article’ linking the Duchess of Sussex’s half-sister Samantha Markle to Sadie Quinlan, the latter’s YouTube ‘Yankee Wally’ channel has been closed. It was done so after the snitch-on-her-sources Hall sent her so-called “evidence” to the social media video sharing medium and thereby proved herself not to be a “reportage writer” but instead a “troll-like campaigner.”
According to joker-not-a-journo Hall, a clearly woke spokesman for YouTube named Jack Malon told her: “Upon review, we have terminated the ‘Yankee Wally’ channel for repeated violations of our harassment policy, which prohibits content targeting individuals based on intrinsic attributes. We enforce this policy equally for everyone, and channels that repeatedly violate or are dedicated to violative content are terminated.”
Responding, Matthew Steeples of The Steeple Times commented: “Whilst the opinions of Sadie Quinlan might not to be everyone’s taste, she is as entitled to her views as much as anyone else. Just like with the case of Shaun Attwood – whose YouTube account has also been removed on occasions – the process by which such occurs is clearly beyond strangely and stupidly regulated.”
“Whilst YouTube is entitled to control its domain in whatever manner it chooses, the fact that a Welsh woman is ‘cancelled’ for simply discussing a topic clearly of interest to her nigh on 50,000 followers seems ludicrous in the extreme. Ms Quinlan, to me, seems as dangerous as a chocolate teapot whilst those campaigning against her – headed by PR peddlers Omid Scobie and Christopher Bouzy – are the true villains of this piece.”
Elsewhere on Friday the Daily Express reported that after the Daily Mail diarist Richard Eden shared news that he had contracted coronavirus, a clear ‘Sussex Squad’ supporter with the handle @royals_sussex trolled him with a meme featuring the reprehensibly vindictive words: “If he dies, he dies.”
Jealous to her core, the wife of the dimwitted drip Prince Harry has never managed to get over the fact that the British public love the Duchess of Cambridge yet loathe her.The Duchess of Sussex’s love life prior to bagging Prince Harry involved a fair amount of what could be termed “lowlife.” The finest example was most certainly tattooed trashbag Simon Rex Cutright.
Gay porn actor turned musician Simon Rex Cutright (AKA ‘Dirt Nasty’) – shown here in a somewhat intoxicated state in a video shared on YouTube – supposedly dated the then Meghan Markle in 200. He claims to have received a letter from her after refusing to sell his story of how they “just hung out” after doing “a TV show together” and meeting “for lunch.”The clear hatred of ‘Sussex Squad’ fanatics was shown in this tweet to ‘Daily Mail’ diarist Richard Eden – an open critic of such people – on Friday after he revealed he had contracted coronavirus. Though this vicious and vile message was reported by many, it remains live on Twitter.
Of her claiming having got married the day before she actually did, Mr Markle stated: “Lying about the archbishop? How can you say: ‘We’ve been married three days before we got married’? Her lies are so obvious, I don’t know why she says them.”
Her very own half-sister, Samantha Markle, has called the woman formerly known as Meghan Markle out as a liar on multiple occasions also. It has been proven that the duchess’s claim that she hasn’t seen her sibling in over 20 years was proven untrue when a photo of the pair 13 years ago emerged.
Her very own half-brother, Thomas Jr., said of her: “I told Prince Harry, I think she’s going to ruin your life. She’s very shallow… She’s a phony, a bully, a jaded, shallow, conceited woman.”
The former Meghan Markle has been called out on multiple occasions for spinning stories against other members of the royal family, most especially the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge.
Staff who’ve worked for her have complained that she is a bully and investigations into this remain ongoing.
The Duchess of Sussex is a known manipulator of the press and paparazzis and it has been claimed that she’ll “twist the truth” to get any headline she wants.
Questions remain as to how many times she’s actually been married in total. Some say twice, some say thrice.
‘BuzzFeed News’ writer Ellie Hall is a woman clearly lacking in journalistic integrity. She snitched on her own sources rather than protecting them. Shame on her.That the “senior reporter” was keener to brag about getting her source cancelled than actually reporting a story speaks volumes as to her lack of decency and respect for honesty in the profession she claims to be part of.This is not the work of a crusading journalist, but instead that of someone obsessed with getting revenge on someone she simply doesn’t like.Clear crackpot Christopher Bouzy is another fine example of a troll dedicated to causing trouble for anyone who dares to speak out against the mendacious minx that is ‘MeGain.’ He is a troll of the very first order in spite of claiming to be a campaigner against such.Omid Scobie has been highlighted in ‘The Steeple Times’ for what he truly is on a number of occasions. He is anything but an honest journalist and instead blocks real ones such as Richard Eden because he cannot face the truth. That truth? That he simply a peddler of piffle and poison on behalf of a woman and her husband who’ve insulted the Queen and her family a little beyond too often.The ‘Finding Freedom’ author’s delight in the expulsion of a Welsh woman from YouTube is clear indication that he is nothing but a pathetic specimen worthy of sectioning to Siberia.The vitriolic nastiness of ‘Sussex Squaddies’ was clearly shown in a tweet by someone going by the nonsensical name of ‘Diana Queen of Hearts’ @BlueNextWaves this morning. They tweeted a remark that suggested they did not care that Sadie Quinlan is now in hospital after her supporters revealed news of such in the hours prior.
In insulting his grandmother by deciding not to attend his grandfather’s memorial, Prince Harry yet again shows himself as nothing but a degenerate drip
Prince Harry used to be a fun-loving sort. The kind of lad who’d go behind the bar at La Brasserie on Brompton Cross and make a cocktail or five and then down them in one hit, here was a cheeky chap who’d be as at home downing sloe gin on a shoot or having a snog with Caroline Flack in Boujis.
Now, aided and abetted by his money hungry ‘Modern Day Mrs Simpson’ wife, this noxious nuisance has decided to insult his grandmother by not turning up for his grandfather’s memorial service on 29th March whilst deciding to go the Netherlands on 16th April instead.
Curiously looking down rather than straight at the camera – indicative of the behaviour of someone with something to hide – the rotten royal was slammed online and amongst others former royal chef Darren McGrady declared: “His grandfather would have given him a clip around the ear and told him to grow up. The Queen will be devastated, and Princess Diana would, too, if she were here.”
Going further, “royal biographer” Angela Levin referenced ‘Mr Meghan Markle’ as a “child stamping his feet” in the context of the Duke of Sussex’s decision to take his own grandmother and the British government to court over their decision to not give him security protection when in the UK. Levin quite correctly added: “It’s all about ‘me, me, me’ rather than going out of the way for his grandmother and showing he cares.”
In days past, the Duke of Sussex used to be spotted in La Brasserie and Boujis. Now, courtesy of his wicked wastrel woke wife, he’s more likely doing yoga and eating yoghurt with the decidedly dull people of Montecito, California. Yawn!Meanwhile elsewhere on Twitter, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s moronic mouthpiece Omid Scobie has been tweeting about the disgrace that is Prince Andrew’s live-in ex-wife – a mouse not a man who paid £12 million to a woman he supposedly never met last week.The Duke and Duchess of Sussex have allegedly been complaining about the “stink” in the environs of their Montecito mansion. According to one local resident: “It smells like offal that has been rotting in the sun. It makes my stomach churn.” With rumours abounding that the pair might divorce even also, all’s not well at the ‘House of Sussex.’
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4tAHU08G1eg
On YouTube, the brilliant Welsh warbler has yet again called out the other ‘MeGain’ mouthpiece that is the warped wazzock Christopher Bouzy. Of him, she declared: “He hounds me 24/7.”
Could the Duchess of Sussex’s half-sister Samantha Markle prove to be her ultimate nemesis? ‘Yankee Wally’ Sadie Quinlan most definitely thinks so
Rightly described yesterday by the brilliantly batty Welsh warbler Sadie Quinlan (AKA ‘Yankee Wally’) as a “right fool,” the Duchess of Sussex may now finally meet the nemesis that is her half-sister Samantha in a court room.
Deservedly smacked in the arse with a lawsuit for £57,000 ($75,000, €69,000 or درهم275,000) by the 57-year-old author of The Diary of Princess Pushy’s Sister, Prince Harry’s wicked wastrel wife is being sued for defamation for allegedly making “false and malicious” statements during her March 2021 interview with Oprah Winfrey.
Headlined in a punchy fashion in TMZ as “SISTER CLAIMS LIES TO OPRAH, OTHERS… Her ‘Rags to Royalty’ Story is Total BS!!!!” with a matching “Megan Markle didn’t have the crappy childhood she wants the public to believe” to follow, Samantha Markle’s suit alleges her sibling’s comments about her have damaged sales of her autobiography, prevented her from getting jobs and caused emotional and mental distress.
Responding, Michael Kump, a lawyer for the Duchess of Sussex, told TMZ: “This baseless and absurd lawsuit is just a continuation of a pattern of disturbing behaviour. We will give it the minimum attention necessary, which is all it deserves.”
Of the amount sought, Quinlan – who last spoke with Samantha Markle some six weeks ago – stated: “It’s not enough… If it gets dirty between Meghan and Sam, it’s going to get very dirty because Sam has a lot more ammo up her sleeve. Meghan’s got nothing on Sam. We’re in a situation here where Sam’s the poor little church mouse whose got nothing to lose.”
Going further Quinlan added of PR peddling pillock Omid Scobie’sFinding Freedom: “Even know now we do know Meghan contributed vastly to it. She practically wrote it… Slap a lawsuit on Meghan. Fantastic. Sam’s got all the evidence.”
Elsewhere, Geo News commented on the responses to the case from “Meghan Markle’s fans” (otherwise known as ‘The Sussex Squad’) and claimed that one went as far as to claim: “Not today Samantha. Let’s finish with Ukraine first. C’mon now.”
The Welsh wonder that is Sadie Quinlan summed up the lawsuit perfectly in a 19:30-minute video shared on YouTube. Shared with her nigh on 50,000 subscribers, the summary has already been liked by 1,700 accounts and viewed over 8,900 times.A truly dysfunctional family – Meghan, Tyler, Thomas Sr, Thomas Jnr and Samantha.The Duchess of Sussex truly morphed into the ‘Modern Day Mrs Simpson’ for her interview with her and Sarah, the Duchess of York’s crony Oprah Winfrey in March last year.‘Yankee Wally’ fan @yankee_wally took to Twitter to claim: “Meghan Markle has become the new Heather Mills. It is not a compliment.” Spot on! Responses included: “I can’t stand Heather, but Meghan is worse” and “yes, they are both from the same mould.”Attempting to distract from the case, pointless prattler Omid Scobie – the leading media mouthpiece for the Duchess of Sussex – took to Twitter to announce: “Tonight I have made equal donations to six organisations responding to conflict and humanitarian crisis in Ukraine, Yemen, Libya, Syria and beyond. The lives of our brothers and sisters are at risk in every corner of the world – please remember them all.” He ought to be reminded that most people do their giving in a more private and far more dignified fashion.In choosing to be the chief tin banger for the ‘Sussex Squad,’ Scobie will go down in history only for one thing: Being on the wrong side of history. The public have seen through him and they’ve seen through the rotten royals who have done nothing but damage to the monarch, her first born son and Prince Harry’s elder sibling. Shame on him.
As ‘MeGain’s’ bestie Omid Scobie claims Sadie Quinlan (AKA ‘Yankee Wally’) is “on a watch list” with the “good folk at South Wales Police and Scotland Yard” and the “Fixated Threat Assessment Centre” also, the popular YouTuber reports him to the police herself
Whilst the Duchess of Sussex was quite rightly forced to apologise to the Appeal Court in London for making a misleading statement – which the BBC described as her (rather conveniently) having “forgotten events” – in December, it seems her number one PR peddler, the wretch that is Omid Scobie has turned his attention to the popular ‘Yankee Wally’ YouTuber Sadie Quinlan and isn’t allowing her to forget her own past.
Yesterday, in an 11:09-minute YouTube upload that has been watched over 17,700 times and ‘liked’ by 3,500 already, Quinlan shared a tweet from Scobie that described her as a “racist” and “deranged criminal.” He went further and claimed: “Don’t even waste a second on what that deranged, racist criminal thinks. Leave it to the good folk at South Wales Police and Scotland Yard, whose Fixated Threat Assessment Centre have [Sadie Quinlan] on a watch list.”
Understandably upset by the harsh words of this so-called “royal editor” for Harpers Bazaar and self-proclaimed New York Times “bestselling author,” Quinlan – who made clear she had no prior knowledge of how Scobie could know of such a listing – decided to respond by herself calling the Metropolitan Police.
She remarked: “The last thing you need Omid Scobie is somebody calling you ‘deranged’” and added: “I am not a criminal. I shall take this absolutely all the way I can. When that lovely police officer rings me back next week from the Fixated Threat department, I am going to take it to the highest level.”
Of two others she believes have connections to such matters, Quinlan added: “Let’s have the bloody lot. I’m watching you and I’m going to make charges against you if I can… I’m coming for you… I am absolutely tamping [Welsh adjective meaning ‘extremely angry’] mad.”
The lesson to mouse-not-a-man Omid Scobie and his associates here should be laid clear: If you give it out, expect it back – especially when you take on the force to be reckoned with that is ‘Yankee Wally.’
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TvOmZpLg0wY
The tweet by Omid Scobie, posted on Twitter on 19th February 2022 at 7:11pm, in which he described Sadie Quinlan as a “deranged, racist criminal.”In August 2020, the ‘Daily Mail’ shared that plastic-not-fantastic Omid previously worked at gossip magazine ‘Heat’ and partied with the ‘glamour model’ Jodie Marsh. They mentioned how somebody had “airbrushed” Meghan Markle’s “entry on the online encyclopedia Wikipedia… to include more flattering details days before her romance with Prince Harry became public” and illustrated the ‘Finding Freedom’ author’s “drastic transformation” in two very different photographs. Mr Scobie is someone who most definitely would like his past forgotten, but curiously he doesn’t want to allow Sadie Quinlan to have hers forgotten.Illustrating himself to be anything but a real journalist, “influencer” Scobie told the ‘Women in Leadership Publication’: “A casual follower be forgiven for thinking that royal news is just fizzy commentary on the pomp and soap opera of The Firm” in their spring 2021 edition. He self-importantly added: “Reaching millions on Twitter has also enabled my own views and advocacy to travel further” and concluded: “I want to do everything I can to ensure that individuals from every background can get a seat at the table.” Here is someone far from a journalist; here, in fact, is someone who should just be called out as the Duchess of Sussex’s PR peddler.An analysis of Omid Scobie’s Twitter feed clearly shows that a large proportion of his followers are a bit like himself: FAKE.The Duchess of Sussex – pictured giving the clearly far more dignified by far Duchess of Cambridge a right old glare – likes to stir the pot. One of her chief pot stirrers is most definitely Omid Scobie – a poison pen pest described by Nikolay Kalinin in ‘The Steeple Times’ in July 2021 as “a washed-up, childish clot” and someone with “no legitimacy in the media industry.”
When he’s not bragging about wearing Balenciaga, Gucci, Louis Vuitton and Christian Dior or sharing photos of his dog, Yoshi, on his Instagram account, the ‘Finding Freedom’ author constantly bangs on about how he believes the royal family to have racist elements. His speculation is rarely supported by anything other than unnamed sources that give his suggestions little to no credibility.
Sadie Quinlan (AKA ‘Yankee Wally’ responds to Omid Scobie calling her a “deranged, racist criminal”
“All my content is found on the public domain with just my own views and opinions and I do follow the fair use and the fair dealing guidelines”
“I think this tripped me over the edge… They can get their just deserts. Scobie wrote this in reply to whatever her name is, Amanda @MattaOfFact.”
“I like it Amanda I thought you did a fabulous spiff of me and if gets you a bit of extra money after your ten grand from your gopher Lee and whatever money you manage to scrape from your Patreon. You’ve got every begging bowl on the Internet opening and waiting for the money, haven’t you? So, make a bit of money off me, my pleasure, fill your boots.”
“But anyway, Scobie replied to this and this is what he said: ‘Oh dear. Don’t even waste a second on what that deranged, racist criminal thinks. Leave it to the good folk at South Wales Police and Scotland Yard, whose Fixated Threat Assessment Centre have her on a watch list.’”
“Right, OK, so I thought to myself it’s got to be done. Now, you know what I say and I’ll say it again and I’m an absolute manic about it. Do not waste police time. Don’t do it. If you’ve got a little problem, your neighbour is giving you gyp, banging on a wall, wait until the next day and ring 101. Don’t dial 999. Don’t ring the police unless it’s urgent.”
“Having said that, who am I to judge what is urgent and what’s not, but you’ll find that yours truly will take an awful lot of s**t before I ring the police. Because, well, well this is the way I was taught.”
“I even apologised to the police officer today saying that somebody could be needing them a lot more than me. He said, erm, in his London accent: ‘Well, don’t worry about it Sadie,” erh.”
“Anyway, let me tell you what happened. So I see this and I’m thinking: ‘One step too far, one step too far.’ So, then I go looking online for whatever the Fixated Person’s thing is and I found all this information.”
“So, I’m thinking, I don’t wanna [sic] ring the police. I do not want to ring the police. So, yes, I can give them that [sharing a screenshot of what information is required], I can give that, I can give that, I’ve got a passport, I’ve got a licence, so I will do that, I do that.”
“Right ‘o. OK and then I got the number for Scotland Yard so I thought maybe I’ll ring them and ask them because I couldn’t find a number for the Fixated Threat people and I didn’t, at the time, see where I could fill in a form.”
“So, I’m on the phone waiting now. This is Scotland Yard. I took a screenshot the minute that they answered at 11:43am. You can see the time at the top there [sharing another screenshot], 16:36 so it is not even an hour ago now and then I found a form that you could fill in on that webpage that I just showed you and so I wrote down everything that I could.”
“Meanwhile, 25 minutes on the phone to Scotland Yard. ‘I’ve been told I’m on your list. It’s all over Twitter and also it has been claimed by Omid Scobie, a journalist, that I am on your ‘watch list.’ I am horrified.” I couldn’t put it all in one, so I scrolled.”
“’Please can you confirm this as a matter of urgency, if this is true? And if it is, why? This has upset me beyond words and I am also extremely cross at the insulting nature of Mr Omid Scobie’s claim. I look forward to your reply ASAP.” Then I said: “Regards.”
“Now, while I was in the middle of filling all this form in, though it didn’t take me long, Scotland Yard answered the phone to me, so then I am on the phone to Scotland Yard and, erm, they answered at around about 4:30pm and I was on the phone to them until about quarter to five.”
“And I spoke to an absolutely, and I’m not just saying this, he was so kind to me because I was almost crying. I was beside myself, I have to be honest because, I mean, erm, I’m not trying to get sympathy here, but I can’t bloody walk. How am I going to stalk anybody? And if I can’t walk, do you know how hard it is for me to post a letter? I’ve got to beg the postman, if I catch him when he delivers a letter. I can’t get out to the postbox, so as far as malicious letters and stuff, everything I do is online.”
“So, they answered the phone and I spoke to him and I explained and he said: ‘Well, you’ve hit lucky today, Sadie.’ I said: “Oh, why’s that?’ He said: ‘Well, because I’m covering here on the main switchboard, but my main job is in the Fixated Threat department.’ Ha ha ha… On my life, on my life, that’s his job. Ha ha ha…”
“So, he asks for my name, my date of birth and all the other things, my address and off he went and he came back and he said, and by now I am crying and I said: ‘Look, I’m worried sick about this.’ I said: ‘I’m not a stalker’ and he said: ‘We’re going to ring you back about this, Sadie,’ he said: ‘And who was the person that made this complaint?’”
“I said: ‘I believe it is Omid Scobie, but it could be somebody else. It’s on Twitter.’ He said: ‘Here’s a reference number.’ Here we are. He gave me his number, the policeman’s number and a reference number and there’s the ‘umpty’ [sic] form and that’s where you can get it if you want to fill it in.”
“So, erm, I’ve haven’t rung South Wales Police yet because I think Scotland Yard is all I need because I’ve looked at this Fixated Threat thing and it’s all based in London Metropolitan Police. So, I thought no, I’m not saying that the Welsh are organ grinders. Not the monkey, the organ grinder. Yeah, Metropolitan Police will be the organ grinder and we are the monkeys, I know that.”
“So, I’m waiting now to hear from them, probably next week and, erm, that’s that. So, I’m not letting this go because, what, what I don’t like, I’ll tell you what I don’t like: I’m not a racist, I can make jokes about people with black skin if I want to. Like, Ricky Gervais. If you don’t like it, don’t bloody listen to me.”
“I am not a criminal anymore. I am an ex-criminal. I’ve paid my price to society twenty bloody years ago.”
“Scobie, you, don’t throw stones unless your own house is clean and what’s the other one, er, ‘deranged.’ Now that, now that hurts because when you’ve been to a psychiatrist for the best part of ten years after you’ve been made homeless and God knows what and you are antidepressants and you’re doing OK thank you very much. And I can hold, I can string a sentence together, I can think coherently and there’s been times, and I don’t mind telling you, I wasn’t able to do that.”
“So, when somebody calls me ‘deranged,’ it kind of, it kind of trips a switch and it’s an angry switch because when you’ve worked hard on your mental health, when you’ve worked bloody hard to get your mental health back to normal, the last thing you need Omid Scobie is somebody calling you ‘deranged.’ That is very, very harmful and to call me a ‘racist’ is wrong. I’ve told you: My son-in-law is the same colour as you.”
“I am not a criminal. I shall take this absolutely all the way I can. When that lovely police officer rings me back next week from the Fixated Threat department, I am going to take it to the highest level.”
“And there’s two other people I’m after too. I’ll tell you who they are now. You [sharing a screenshot of the Twitter handle of Unstoppable-Chi, @dumielauxepices], Lorenzo, I know, you. I know it’s you that busted me in the beginning. It’s you that got into the ‘me-we’ group and it’s you that exposed my criminal past for all to see.”
“You hide in the shadows, you little creep. You hide in the shadows and you pop up with some really cruel things. You have been stalking me because you know more about me than what I know myself. I’m watching you, I’ve been watching you for two years, but now been as we’re going to bring it all out in the open, let’s have the bloody lot. I’m watching you and I’m going to make charges against you if I can.”
“And you [sharing a screenshot of the Twitter handle of Gin Perdide, @GPerdide], you little bastard. Who are you? You were watching me. Everytime you talk about me, you put the word ‘criminal,’ ‘convict,’ ‘madam.’ You’ve got a, I don’t even know who you are, but I’ll tell you what, I will get Twitter to find out who you are and anybody else who keeps calling me a ‘criminal’ or a ‘racist’ or ‘deranged.’”
“Those three things are like red rags to a bull and my birth sign is Taurus the bull and my birthday is the same day as the Queen. We are built with the same steel backbone. I’m thirty years younger than her. God bless her and I will come for all of you, but meanwhile, meanwhile, you can just sit there and s**t yourself quietly and I’ll be coming for you.”
“Thanks for listening everybody. I’ll be back later. Honestly, this will wash over me. It’s just right now, I am absolutely tamping [Welsh adjective meaning ‘extremely angry’] mad.”
In her uniquely chirpy ‘Yankee Wally’ style, in the description box, Quinlan added
“Sorry, I forgot to say Cheerio!”
“Now you’ve seen me at my worst…. Or, have you?”
“It’s very hard for me to keep an even keel when someone’s upset me so badly.”
“People that have mental health problems, never ever get them totally ‘fixed.’ They are usually suppressed with antidepressants and antipsychotics. I’m on huge doses of both.”
“But, when Scobie has the audacity to call me ‘deranged’ … It triggered me in a way only other sufferers can understand. “
“Heck, I have not worked with therapy counselling psychiatrists and drugs for 20 years to be diagnosed as DERANGED!”
“#omidscobie said a very very bad thing. and he will learn not to verbally abuse those who are not as strong as him
“And everybody else whose insulted me. You will all be made accountable.”
“I LOVE MY ONLINE FRIENDS DEARLY and I will defend you too.”
“CHEERIO!”
Responses to Omid Scobie’s vexatious tweet about Sadie Quinlan
In telling companies to give their workers time to meditate when they should be working, Prince Harry shows himself as nothing but a delusional drip
Summed up most accurately on Twitter by one Andrew Mander – who responded: “As spoken by a chap with no actual idea what daily work actually means” – work-shy woke Prince Harry has quite deservedly come under fire after yet again patronising the very public he ran away from when he claimed him and his wife wanted “privacy.”
Filmed at his vast £10.3 million ($14 million, €12.2 million or درهم51.4 million) mansion in California, no doubt with money minded ‘Meddling MeGain’ directing his every word in the background, the Duke of Sussex this time decided to offer up gobbledygook about “me time,” “experience burnout” and meditation in the work place. He did so on behalf of the BetterUp “empowerment” startup – a company which pays him a most likely top whack salary, figure unknown.
Proving himself blindly unable to understand the fact that companies employ individuals to do a task that is actually called “work” and that this “work” involves doing some actual “work,” this somewhat intellectually challenged and very privileged brat told firms to “give everyone time to focus on themselves.” Of his own “work” – of which no one else seems to know what that involves – the attention seeker pathetically bleated:
“I experienced burn out and getting to the very end of everything I had. Any fuel I had in the engine, it was like, boom.”
“I know how my nervous system is going to react to things out of my control. [I think]: ‘What do I have in my toolbox?’ What do I have available?”
Going further without explaining that him and his brass necked wife are simply actually doing all they can to shamelessly rake in as much wonga as possible without doing diddly squat since their supposedly permanent move Stateside, the non-expert about anything renegade royal concluded to anyone prepared to listen:
“Mental fitness is the pinnacle… I know that I need to meditate every day… Put it [into your daily routine] like brushing your teeth every morning… As I said at the beginning, everyone has such busy days, if you have 15 minutes of white space… I allot half an hour or 45 minutes in the morning when one kid has gone to school and the other is having a nap, there’s a break in our program… I hope everybody is able to do that.”
Those with a genuine understanding of mental health, such as perhaps the late Dr Anthony Clare – Britain’s best-known psychiatrist – certainly would have been anything but impressed by this moronic mouthpiece’s musings and nor were the public. “Absolutely insufferable, his mom must be spinning in her grave” stated one of this total drip; another added: “He’s really lost it now. HazBeen. Does he need professional help? Yes, from a lawyer to get a divorce.” Next!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ypnnESiJ_bA
DELUSIONAL DRIP PRINCE HARRY’S MORONIC MANTRA
AIM FOR THE PINNACLE OF MENTAL FITNESS:
“Mental fitness is the pinnacle, it’s what you’re aiming for. The road towards that can be really bumpy… it’s called inner ‘work’ for a reason.’ “
INNER WORK:
“With everything else around you, the only way you can combat [burnout] and build resilience for the outside world and your entire environment is the inner work… Outer work becomes so much easier when you get to grips with the inner work… If everybody [had time] to do [inner work], the shift in global consciousness and awareness would be enormous, it would be vast.”
DAILY MEDITATION:
“I know that I need to meditate every day… Put it [into your daily routine] like brushing your teeth every morning… You need to put it into your day diary as a habit otherwise it’s the first thing that drops away from your busy day.”
DAILY ME TIME:
“I have now put in about half an hour, 45 minutes in the morning when one kid has gone to school and the other is having a nap, there’s a break in our program. It’s like, right, it’s either for a workout, take the dog for a walk, get out in nature, maybe meditate. I would hope that everybody would be able to do that.”
LISTEN TO LESSONS FROM THE UNIVERSE:
“Life is about learning and if you’re in your 20s, your 30s, your 40s, and even your 50s and you think you’ve got it sorted then bad stuff is going to happen. But when bad thing happen I think, there’s a lesson here, I’m being schooled by the universe, there is something for me to learn.”
TURN NEGATIVES INTO POSITIVES:
“Every single bad thing – or the things you perceive to be bad – that happen actually can be good.”
SURROUND YOURSELF WITH MENTAL COACHES:
“You need to have someone there who is not only coaching you through life but challenging your perspective. That’s what I ask [my mental coach] for on a weekly basis… Professional help, friends, family, anyone can help you in that coaching process [and give you] the ability to be able to find somebody else to throw ideas off or feelings or thoughts.”
WIPE YOUR MENTAL WINDSCREEN:
“Have different points of views in your life and friends who will not worry about pushing back on things you say or feel to be able to encourage you to be able to see it more clearly. I view that as trying to surround myself with people who will happily wash [my mental] windscreen and clear those filters… There is an endless filter system of what you think is happening.”
CREATE A MENTAL TOOL BOX:
“I know how my nervous system is going to react to certain situations that are out of my control, [so I think], what have I got in my tool box? What tools can help me deal with this?”
HONE YOUR MENTAL SUPERPOWER:
“Life is about discovery. In that discovery you are going to find things that you don’t like, you’re going to find things that make you uncomfortable, that are constantly pushing back on you but as you work your way around those things, all of a sudden the stresses, the chaos, and all of the things that were working against you in your life, be it private life, be it work life… all of the things getting in your way either fall away or you visualise them and are able to turn a negative into a positive and therefore make those things work for you. It almost feels like a superpower.”
In spite of her victory over ‘The Mail on Sunday’ all the Duchess of Sussex will be able to do with her winnings is afford a trip to Poundland; £1 ‘MeGain’ better now also watch out for metaphorical banana skins
This morning, The Guardian’s redoubtable media editor Jim Waterson ran a story titled: “Meghan to receive just £1 from Mail on Sunday for privacy invasion.”
In the article, Waterson revealed that the “newspaper [and its sister website MailOnline] accepts defeat” and “will pay the Duchess of Sussex just £1 in damages for invading her privacy by publishing a private letter she had sent to her father.”
Analysing this Pyrrhic victory for what it truly is – most especially given the catastrophic reputational damage the former Meghan Markle has done not only to her birth family, the family she has married into and to the institution that is the royal family – en-route to her “success,” media lawyer Mark Stephens told Waterson of the “weakness” in her case. He remarked: “It does show that the curation of her reputation was an area where she had effectively invaded her own privacy.”
Whilst The Mail on Sunday will also have to cover a “substantial part” of the Duchess of Sussex’s costs and pay also a “confidential sum in damages for copyright infringement,” the £1 given to ‘Mendacious MeGain’ – a woman forced to apologise to the Appeal Court for “making misleading statements” during the case – will pay for only one thing; a little something at Poundland.
Equally, whilst the Duchess of Sussex might view this to be a victory over Britain’s biggest newspaper and a victory in her meddling mind for what she sees as “right over wrong,” she has actually made a catastrophic error. Forevermore, the press will be after her and they’ll never cease in their desire for revenge. The dominant half of ‘Ginge and Cringe’ needs now watch out for the metaphorical banana skins she’ll find constantly in front of her; they’ll be ready and waiting for her to slip on.
In February 2019, “wannabe Mother Teresa” Duchess of Sussex – a woman whose drip of a husband once remarked: “What Meghan wants, MEGHAN GETS!” – wrote patronising messages on bananas that were to be given to prostitutes. Responding, Piers Morgan cried out: “Meaningless, scorn-inducing guff” and now those banana skins may come back to metaphorically bit this clear fruit loop in the bum after she decided to up her antics in her war against the media machine.
Of her claiming having got married the day before she actually did, Mr Markle stated: “Lying about the archbishop? How can you say: ‘We’ve been married three days before we got married’? Her lies are so obvious, I don’t know why she says them.”
Her very own half-sister, Samantha, has called her out as a liar on multiple occasions also. It has been proven that the duchess’s claim that she hasn’t seen her sibling in over 20 years was proven untrue when a photo of the pair 13 years ago emerged.
Her very own half-brother, Thomas Jr., said of her: “I told Prince Harry, I think she’s going to ruin your life. She’s very shallow… She’s a phony, a bully, a jaded, shallow, conceited woman.”
The former Meghan Markle has been called out on multiple occasions for spinning stories against other members of the royal family, most especially the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge.
Staff who’ve worked for her have complained that she is a bully and investigations into this remain ongoing.
The Duchess of Sussex is a known manipulator of the press and paparazzis and it has been claimed that she’ll “twist the truth” to get any headline she wants.
Questions remain as to how many times she’s actually been married in total. Some say twice, some say thrice.
In April 2020, self-declared “celebrity branding expert” and author of ‘The Kim Kardashian Principle: Why Shameless Sells (and How to Do It Right)’ Jeetendr Sehdev remarked: “The Meghan and Harry brand has always been very disruptive. They’re going to show us all a different way in which royal family members can live. The closest comparison to Meghan and Harry will be the Obamas and what they’re actually doing, I mean they’ve created an entertainment entity where they’re producing documentaries and I think that will be a similar route that Meghan and Harry can certainly take.” Mr Sehdev clearly has neglected to consider the negative effect the Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s war with the media will have in helping them reach such a position; he could be onto something with his title “shameless” however.In July 2021 – following on from his appearance on the ITV documentary ‘Harry & William: What Went Wrong?’ – so-called “royal finance expert” David McClure tweeted: “Harry and Meghan will have to generate a lot of money as their overheads run to an estimated £4 – 5 [million per annum] when you include security, lawyers, managers and PRs.” Frankly, the money generated from ‘MeGain’s’ Pyrrhic £1 victory and the bonus from the damages won’t go far in helping with that.Where’s PR peddler and author of ‘Finding Freedom’ Omid Scobie when you actually bloody need him? In recent weeks, seriously sycophantic Scobie’s media appearances spouting deranged drivel about the situation between ‘Ginge and Cringe’ and their relatives have done his so-called ‘bestie’ nothing but harm.
Virginia Roberts Giuffre would be wrong to rely on the narcissistic, lying Duchess of Sussex in her case against Prince Andrew… A rerun of the ‘MeGain & Randy Show’ would benefit utterly nobody
As we highlighted in January 2020 and again in March 2021, a question hangs over the Duchess of Sussex and it is: “Did the then Meghan Markle meet Prince Andrew before she met Prince Harry?” Put in another manner, one could ask: “Did this calculating American actress meet the ‘bestie’ of the since croaked paedophile Jeffrey Epstein before she met the pathetically wet ‘ginger drip’ she later went on to marry?”
Whilst to some this might not seem hugely important, the devil is always in the detail and for long now, many have suggested that the Duke of Sussex’s self-serving wife has peddled nonsense about how she first came into contact with the royal family.
For one, it has been suggested that the Suits ‘star’ was allegedly seen cavorting on a yacht with the Pizza Express lover years before she became the dominant half of the dodgy duo that is ‘Ginge and Cringe.’ Equally, the now in-exile duchess, has herself banged on about a ‘friendship’ with Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie prior to meeting-without-Googling Prince Harry. Of course, for that disgraceful Oprah interview, that narrative subsequently changed, but wouldn’t it just when multi-million dollar deals were landing at ‘MeGain’s’ feet?
Of why he might depose the Duchess of Sussex, Boies yesterday told The Daily Beast:
“One; she is in the U.S. so we have jurisdiction over her.”
“Two; she is somebody who obviously, at least for a period of time, was a close associate of Prince Andrew and hence is in a position to perhaps have seen what he did, and perhaps if not to have seen what he did to have heard people talk about it.”
“Because of her past association with him, she may very well have important knowledge, and will certainly have some knowledge.”
“Three; she is somebody who we can count on to tell the truth. She checks all three boxes.”
“Andrew will be forced to give evidence under oath [as part of that process]… He has no way of escaping that.”
Mr Boies clearly is a man who hasn’t done a hell of a lot of research into the Duchess of Sussex’s previous “inconveniences” with the truth and he is someone who hasn’t considered her recent ticking off during her libel action against The Mail On Sunday – during which she had to apologise to the Appeal Court for “making misleading statements” about biography briefing notes for Omid Scobie’s tittle-tattling tome, Finding Freedom.
Today, we suggest a piece of advice to both David Boies and Virginia Roberts Giuffre – Don’t go down the ‘MeGain & Randy’ hole; it’ll only end in a very sweaty disaster.
Of her claiming having got married the day before she actually did, Mr Markle stated: “Lying about the archbishop? How can you say: ‘We’ve been married three days before we got married’? Her lies are so obvious, I don’t know why she says them.”
Her very own half-sister, Samantha, has called her out as a liar on multiple occasions also. It has been proven that the duchess’s claim that she hasn’t seen her sibling in over 20 years was proven untrue when a photo of the pair 13 years ago emerged.
Her very own half-brother, Thomas Jr., said of her: “I told Prince Harry, I think she’s going to ruin your life. She’s very shallow… She’s a phony, a bully, a jaded, shallow, conceited woman.”
The former Meghan Markle has been called out on multiple occasions for spinning stories against other members of the royal family, most especially the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge.
Staff who’ve worked for her have complained that she is a bully and investigations into this remain ongoing.
She is a known manipulator of the press and paparazzis and it has been claimed that she’ll “twist the truth” to get any headline she wants.
Questions remain as to how many times she’s actually been married in total. Some say twice, some say thrice.
