The Steeple Times

Category: Blithering Bores

  • Boo-Hoo Schofe – Brazen Blubber Phillip Schofield Booed At National TV Awards

    Boo-Hoo Schofe – Brazen Blubber Phillip Schofield Booed At National TV Awards

    Boo-hoo for cretinous crybaby queue jumper Phillip Schofield as the flogger of “plughole plonk” unsurprisingly gets booed at the National Television Awards

    Rightly called out as a disgrace in September alongside his equally tedious This Morning co-host Holly Willoughby, smugger-than-smug flogger of “fit only for pouring down the plughole boxed wine” Phillip Schofield unsurprisingly got booed at the National Television Awards last night. They were at the OVO Arena in Wembley, London to accept the 2022 Best Daytime Award and surrounded by an audience of their peers.

     

    Known best until he and Willoughby jumped the queues to pay respects to the late Queen as she lay in state in Westminster for laughable, lowbrow television, the “widespread backlash” against this overpaid pair of prattlers caused “concerns for the pair’s mental health” if you’d believe the MailOnline’s Brittany Chain and Sean O’Grady. If, however, you take the view of the majority of the populous into consideration instead, the public would simply rather these two tedious twerps were just taken off our telly boxes for once and for all.

     

    Whilst Schofield and Willoughby’s bosses defended “queuegate” and expressed “serious concerns over their well-being,” it was made clear again last night that even those in their industry have also had quite enough of the audacious antics of this awful duo.

     

    In response to the “outrageous scandal,” a Change.org petition started by a woman named Laura Harrison argued:

     

    “Holly Willoughby and Phillip Schofield, two hosts of one of the most damaging to mental health day time TV shows This Morning, were able to push past those thousands and get immediate access [those waiting to pay their respects to the late Queen].”

     

    “I’d like to see This Morning axed for good as I do believe it causes more harm than good, without people noticing. For example, like turning cost of living anxiety into a game show. At the least though, these presenters Holly and Phillip should finally be removed from our TV screens. They’ve monopolised way too long.”

     

    “If you agree, please sign. If enough people sign we can show ITV that the public do matter. And these two don’t deserve our time.”

     

    As of this morning at 11.30am, the total number of signatures to the petition had reached 79,000. It is time ITV paid attention to the public and axed not only This Morning’s Phillip Schofield and Holly Willoughby but also ridded their channel of the equally repugnant harpy hosts of the sexually salacious Loose Women.

     

    Cretinous crybaby Schofield is an attention seeking berk who well and truly should be silenced for once and for all.
    Boxed wine
    Instead of skipping queues and upsetting the nation in the process, the all-round-angry man and ‘This Morning’ host and ex-sidekick of Gordon the Gopher should quit his ITV job and focus on improving his deservedly slammed boxed wines. He thought his red “perfect with olives” whilst the public thought it “better poured down the plughole.”
    Christine Hamilton
    Telly box legend Christine Hamilton showed her outrage for Phillip Schofield on 16th September when she highlighted how footballer David Beckham queued with the public whilst the ‘This Morning’ host “queue jumped.” She highlighted the lack of “special treatment” for the ex-England footballer with the ITV presenter’s arrogance and concluded: “Has he endured the privations of the queue? Has he hell. What in God’s name is he doing? Who the hell does he think he is?”
    Matthew McGreevy 1
    Phillip Schofield was photographed Matthew McGreevy on a number of occasions. In 2020, various publications reported about the links between the two during the latter’s youth.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cGuoqjTg1O8&feature=emb_imp_woyt
    The temper tantrum prone television presenter with his ‘friend’ Mr McGreevy at a later date when they worked together. Whether they are still in contact or friends still even is unknown.
    Axe Loose Women petition
    Please sign our petition to get the equally repugnant ‘Loose Women’ axed from ITV. Started in 2018, it has yet to gain the traction of the ‘Axe Phillip Schofield and Holly Willoughby from TV’ on Change.org, but it deserves to now be revived. In it, at the time of launching it, Matthew Steeples stated: “ITV1’s ‘Loose Women’ celebrates all that is toxic about womankind. Their latest debacle, involving Coleen Nolan making Kim Woodburn cry on air, is indicative of how low this show stoops. On another occasion Judy Finnigan suggested the convicted rapist Ched Evans deserved to be allowed to return to playing football. There have been plenty of other examples involving Katie Price, Gloria Hunniford and Linda Robson that simply provide illustration of how tawdry this programme – screened when mothers are surely watching with young children – is. ITV – Do the decent thing. Axe ‘Loose Women.’”
  • Jeremy Corbyn Joins The Sussex Squad

    Jeremy Corbyn Joins The Sussex Squad

    As the ‘Sussex Squad’ yet again get rightly called out on Twitter, shameless socialist Jeremy Corbyn bizarrely leaps to the multi-millionaire’s defence; with an unlikely friend like him, who needs enemies?

    This morning, as is so often the case, the ‘Sussex Squad’ and their mistress-in-chief the Duchess of Sussex trended on Twitter. There is nothing surprising about that – given the public’s clear dislike for the meddling menace formerly known as Meghan Markle – but now, it seems, the wicked wench has gone and got herself an unlikely super-fan: Labour’s worst ever leader, Jeremy Corbyn.

     

    Speaking to Aaron Bastani, the co-founder of the left-wing media organisation Novara Media, on Tuesday ‘Jezza’ remarked:

     

    “I had very nice chats with Harry and Meghan… Very interesting, interesting. Harry’s life, Harry’s life has always been totally in the public eye, but a former serving officer and so on in the armed forces and Meghan, I think, is very interesting, a very clear-thinking woman, I’ve got a lot of time for her.”

     

    “[She’s not been treated so badly] in the last few days, in the last few days it’s been alright for the last few days. They’ve been quite warm towards her, but she, erm, before that, I think the treatment of her has been appalling.”

     

    “It’s led by the media wanting to, erm, I don’t know why, they just wanted to build her up into a negative figure, which she’s not. She is an intelligent, thoughtful woman.”

     

    “I absolutely think there’s a racial component to it, absolutely, yeah. I do.”

     

    “I mean, erm, who? Why? That’s speculation, but you know, she is a very able person and she’s got a great contribution to make and lots of radical ideas. She’s a good speaker, good, good.”

     

    “I think that’s what the stress is [a career outside her marriage]… Well, the Duke of Edinburgh always called it ‘The Firm’ because they should be, click, like that. [She wasn’t up that]… NOPE! That’s what I understand, yeah.”

     

    “Like that, where there’s any family stress, it’s very difficult to cope with. Look at it from the human point of view.”

     

    Who’d have thought a far-left socialist and a woman living in a £14 million mansion in Montecito would end up besties? They say stranger things happen, but in this curious case they most certainly already have.

     

    https://twitter.com/royal_suitor/status/1575251792354738177
    Who’d have thought a leftie like Jeremy Corbyn would want to become a mouthpiece for the meddling menace that is the woman formerly known as Meghan Markle? Perhaps this hypocritical toerag is angling for a holiday at her Montecito mansion?

    What’s the truth about the stories that abound about the Duchess of Sussex?

    • In November 2021, the duchess was forced to apologise to the Appeal Court in London for making a misleading statement in her privacy case against The Mail on Sunday’s publishers.
    • Her very own father, Thomas, has called out her many untruths about him and others again, again and again.
    • Of her claiming having got married the day before she actually did, Mr Markle stated: “Lying about the archbishop? How can you say: ‘We’ve been married three days before we got married’? Her lies are so obvious, I don’t know why she says them.”
    • Her very own half-sister, Samantha, who is currently bringing a defamation case against her, has called her out as a liar on multiple occasions also. It has been proven that the duchess’s claim that she hasn’t seen her sibling in over 20 years was proven untrue when a photo of the pair 13 years ago emerged.
    • Her very own half-brother, Thomas Jr., said of her: “I told Prince Harry, I think she’s going to ruin your life. She’s very shallow… She’s a phony, a bully, a jaded, shallow, conceited woman.”
    • The wife of Prince Harry has been called out on multiple occasions for spinning stories against other members of the royal family, most especially the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge.
    • Staff who’ve worked for her have complained that she is a bully and investigations into this remain ongoing.
    • The Duchess of Sussex is a known manipulator of the press and paparazzis and it has been claimed that she’ll “twist the truth” to get any headline she wants.
    • Questions remain as to how many times she’s actually been married in total. Some say twice, some say thrice.
    • Questions remain also as to what engagement the duchess has had with meddlers such as Christopher Bouzy, Omid Scobie and her other ‘Sussex Squaddies’ and also as to what her deals with the likes of Netflix and Spotify involve her ‘spilling.’
    • Did the ‘Montecito Meddler’ meet Prince Andrew or Prince Harry first? Rumours abound that she could have spent time and holidayed with the former as long ago as 2001 and that her claim to have no prior knowledge of the royal family until 2016 is just utter baloney.
    • “Would you trust this woman with a bargepole?” is something often asked of this money motivated minx.

     

    Sussex Squad trends on Twitter (again)…

  • Shame On Schofield – Plonk Flogging Plonker Causes Outrage By Queue Jumping With No Respect To The Queen

    Shame On Schofield – Plonk Flogging Plonker Causes Outrage By Queue Jumping With No Respect To The Queen

    Boxed plonk selling plonker Philip Schofield outrages brilliantly bonkers ‘British Battleaxe’ Christine Hamilton by skipping the queue to pay respects to Her Majesty The Queen

    “What in God’s name is he doing? #QueueJumping Who the hell does he think he is?” stormed the brilliantly bonkers ‘British Battleaxe’ Christine Hamilton of the prized plonker TV presenter and seller of definitely-not-so-prized plonk Phillip Schofield yesterday on Twitter.

     

    Spectacularly right in her analysis of Schofield skipping the queue to pay respects to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II prior to her funeral on Monday, Hamilton was far from her alone in her anger at this warbling wazzock sticking two fingers up to members of the public who are now queuing for upto 24 hours to pass our wonderful former monarch for a moment whilst he just waltzed in.

     

    Sanctimonious self-server Schofield, of course, has form. Condemned previously by Jonathan Dimbleby as “cretinous,” here is an overpaid television twerp who was laughed at as ludicrous in October 2020 for “making bizarre claims to have been murdered in a past life because of a debt” whilst promoting his “self-indulgent” ‘memoir’ Life’s What You Make Of It in an article in the Mirror.

     

    At that time whilst desperately seeking any kind of publicity possible, the petulant and pompous This Morning presenter whined that he believed “he and an (imaginary) ‘family’ he’d plainly invented were murdered in a ‘past life’ over a debt.”

     

    Showing himself as an utter crackpot, the definitely deranged flogger of wine condemned as “only fit for the bin” and “no more palatable than fizzy Ribena” declared:

     

    “I opened the door to silence and felt horror wash over me. Three steps in, and I saw them – two murdered bodies on the floor.”

     

    “I knew they were my wife and small child. Horror turned to fury. I knew why they were dead. I owed money to two brothers who worked at the end of the street in a sawmill.”

     

    “The brother [then] found me, dragged me outside, punched me to the ground and, as my head hit the mud, he repeatedly stamped on it until I was dead!”

     

    Behaving with dignity after a death is clearly something that this cretinous creep clearly hasn’t learnt. Shame on this ultimate television twerp; it is now time for Philip Schofield to offer an apology to the hundreds of thousands of people he pushed by without a shred of real respect.

     

    Pictured top – Phillip Schofield looking angry whilst being noticed skipping the queue to pay respects to Her Majesty The Queen yesterday (left) and looking angry on the telly box on a previous occasion (right).

     

    Christine Hamilton
    Telly box legend Christine Hamilton showed her outrage for Phillip Schofield yesterday when she highlighted how footballer David Beckham queued with the public whilst the ‘This Morning’ host “queue jumped.” She highlighted the lack of “special treatment” for the ex-England footballer with the ITV presenter’s arrogance and concluded: “Has he endured the privations of the queue? Has he hell. What in God’s name is he doing? Who the hell does he think he is?”
    Matthew Steeples Jonathan Dimbleby
    In 2012, fellow television presenter Jonathan Dimbleby called out the ‘This Morning’ presenter as “cretinous” over his decision to present the then Prime Minister David Cameron with a list of names of alleged paedophiles during a live television segment. Mr Dimbleby concluded: “Grow up.”
    Boxed wine
    Instead of skipping queues and upsetting the nation in the process, the all-round-angry man and ‘This Morning’ host and ex-sidekick of Gordon the Gopher should focus on improving his deservedly slammed boxed wines. He thought his red “perfect with olives” whilst the public thought it “better poured down the plughole.”
    Matthew McGreevy 1
    Phillip Schofield was photographed Matthew McGreevy on a number of occasions. In 2020, various publications reported about the links between the two during the latter’s youth.
    Matthew McGreevy 2
    The temper tantrum prone television presenter with his ‘friend’ Mr McGreevy at a later date when they worked together. Whether they are still in contact or friends still even is unknown.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cGuoqjTg1O8&feature=emb_imp_woyt
  • Me, Me, Me Meghan Mocked – Meghan Markle’s Farcical Manchester Speech Derided

    Me, Me, Me Meghan Mocked – Meghan Markle’s Farcical Manchester Speech Derided

    As the dopey Duchess of Sussex is derided for her “me, me, me” speech in Manchester, her pugnacious PR peddler Omid Scobie continues his cretinous campaign against her husband’s family

    Today, as the new Prime Minister Liz Truss heads to Balmoral to see the Queen, it remains unknown as to whether her grandson Prince Harry and his wife – currently in Europe bigging themselves up in spite of the public clearly not wanting them present – will bother to do the same and pay a visit also.

     

    In Düsseldorf today for the Invictus Games but said to be have “free time” tomorrow before being expected at the WellChild Awards in London on Thursday, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex were deservedly slammed by Gyles Brandreth yesterday on ITV’s This Morning programme.

     

    Speaking of the dastardly duo, the much-loved veteran broadcaster and author declared: “The number of people being as sympathetic to them [the Sussexes] as they were initially does seem to be sort of thinning out a little bit… Once you make yourself the story, then you yourself become the story. What should be the story is the good works that you are doing… but, in fact, what we’re talking about is the family rift.”

     

    Unsurprisingly, elsewhere the MailOnline’s Mark Duell referenced an intervention by Omid Scobie – who he termed “Meghan and Harry’s friend and trusted media partner” – in which the feckless Finding Freedom ‘author’ laughably claimed: “This is very much about the work [that the couple] wanted to do ever since they stepped back.” The leading “Sussex Squaddie” and all-round troll did, however, fail to mention what role paymasters’ Netflix and Spotify would play in the charade and also neglected to justify his continuing campaign against other members of Prince Harry’s family.

     

    Turning to the speech to 2,000 young people in Manchester yesterday by the Duchess of Sussex, The Sun’s Sarah Grealish reported on a “Meg-A Snub” and shared news of the former Suits actress and her drippy husband being “booed and branded ‘fake royals’ by [the] crowd on [their] ‘me, me, me’ mini-tour.” The duchess referenced herself an astonishing 54 times during her 7-minute “nonsensical” tirade before the assembled gathering at the One Young World youth gala.

     

    Grealish added that the couple were faced with “anti-royal placards” and “one woman accused Meghan of being a ‘liar and a hypocrite’ and of launching an ‘attack’ on the royal family.” Another, “Janet from Manchester” is said to have added: “She’s a fake humanitarian and a fake feminist. She’s a social climber… She thought she could be a celebrity in the royal family and she’s the most toxic, divisive woman I’ve ever heard of in my life.”

     

    Pictured top – Plastic-not-anything-but-fantastic PR peddler not-a-journalist Omid Scobie (left) and his delusional puppet mistress, the Duchess of Sussex (right) yesterday in the north of England.

     

    Manchester
    The ‘Montecito Meddler’ turned up looking like a scarlet woman to give her speech yesterday. It was met with derision given it was just about herself rather than inspiring to the young people who’d paid upto £1,000 to be present.
    Jimmy Failla
    On Twitter, Jimmy Failla of ‘Fox Across America’ called out the Duchess of Sussex and remarked of her: “It takes a special kind of stupid to claim women are being held back on the SAME DAY they name a Female Prime Minister” in the United Kingdom.
    Meanwhile this morning, after the ‘Daily Mail’s’ Richard Eden referenced “charity clearly [starting] at home for mother and daughter” behind the One Young World charity – after ‘The Sun’ reported that Kate Robertson and her daughter Ella Robertson McKay took home £634,494 in pay between them last year in spite of the pandemic, ‘The Steeple Times’s’ editor Matthew Steeples expressed surprise that “Chanel-clad” Baroness Meyer – who Eden had previously called out for her “charitable” antics” – had not got in on the act.
    Unwanted
    The second son of Prince Charles and his late former wife Diana, Princess of Wales were told they were “fake royals” and to “f**k off” by one placard waving protestor. Another added: “[‘MeGain’] has used every card she can – racism, mental health, feminism. She’s not a feminist, she’s just a hypocrite.”
    Booed
    As the duo arrived at the Bridgewater Hall, they were booed and jeered from behind barriers by an angry mob. Their demand for a “ring of steel” security curtain to shield them from such did nothing except draw further attention to how much the British public truly dislike their audacious antics.
    Approval
    The couple’s popularity has plunged further and further into the quagmire in recent months. Nobody is surprised about that and they’re most certainly up there with non-sweating friend of child abusing sex traffickers Prince Andrew in the very, very disliked stakes.

    What’s the truth about the stories that abound about the Duchess of Sussex?

    • In November 2021, the duchess was forced to apologise to the Appeal Court in London for making a misleading statement in her privacy case against The Mail on Sunday’s publishers.
    • Her very own father, Thomas, has called out her many untruths about him and others again, again and again.
    • Of her claiming having got married the day before she actually did, Mr Markle stated: “Lying about the archbishop? How can you say: ‘We’ve been married three days before we got married’? Her lies are so obvious, I don’t know why she says them.”
    • Her very own half-sister, Samantha, who is currently bringing a defamation case against her, has called her out as a liar on multiple occasions also. It has been proven that the duchess’s claim that she hasn’t seen her sibling in over 20 years was proven untrue when a photo of the pair 13 years ago emerged.
    • Her very own half-brother, Thomas Jr., said of her: “I told Prince Harry, I think she’s going to ruin your life. She’s very shallow… She’s a phony, a bully, a jaded, shallow, conceited woman.”
    • The wife of Prince Harry has been called out on multiple occasions for spinning stories against other members of the royal family, most especially the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge.
    • Staff who’ve worked for her have complained that she is a bully and investigations into this remain ongoing.
    • The Duchess of Sussex is a known manipulator of the press and paparazzis and it has been claimed that she’ll “twist the truth” to get any headline she wants.
    • Questions remain as to how many times she’s actually been married in total. Some say twice, some say thrice.
    • Did the ‘Montecito Meddler’ meet Prince Andrew or Prince Harry first? Rumours abound that she could have spent time and holidayed with the former as long ago as 2001 and that her claim to have no prior knowledge of the royal family until 2016 is just utter baloney.
    • “Would you trust this woman with a bargepole?” is something often asked of this money motivated minx.

     

  • Tommy’s Trolls v Sussex Squaddies – Vile Abusive Troll Supporters of Ghislaine Maxwell, Tommy Robinson and Duchess of Sussex

    Tommy’s Trolls v Sussex Squaddies – Vile Abusive Troll Supporters of Ghislaine Maxwell, Tommy Robinson and Duchess of Sussex

    Whose troll is worse? The bigots who support racist Tommy Robinson, the apologists for mucky madam Ghislaine Maxwell or Meghan Markle’s ‘Sussex Squaddies’?

    Whilst Ghislaine Maxwell has pathetic PR peddling pillocks like Brian Basham and Jay Beecher still batting for her on social media in spite of the evidence pointing towards that they – just like the lawyers currently suing her for £754,000 ($878,000, €877,000 or درهم2.2 million) over their unpaid bills – won’t get a dime for their time, the likes of the Tommy Robinson and the Duchess of Sussex continue to follow her lead and encourage their deranged troll followers to harass anyone who dares call their appalling antics out.

     

    Yesterday, when rabid racist Robinson was trending on Twitter over his hate-stoking towards Pakistani men, I dared to suggest that it rather suited his narrative of profiteering from the somewhat beyond stupid supporters who’ve funded his lifestyle for long now, I was met with comments that included suggestions that I was a “grooming gang apologist” and indeed a “nonce” myself.

     

    Clearly endgendered with the intent of encouraging hate crimes against myself and others who agreed with my sentiments, these keyboard warriors are the kind of people that wouldn’t say boo to a goose in a pub, but assume that from behind their nasty net curtains they can make threats and issue slurs to their hearts’ contents.

     

    In the hours that followed, after calling out one particularly obnoxious woman believed to be called Lucy Terina (whose mangled missives are shared below along with those of ‘Sussex Squaddie’ leader Christopher Bouzy), Robinson’s ranters bombarded me with hate and suggested all kinds of nonsense. In doing so, however, all they did was illustrate to anyone rational that Twitter is simply an echo room where those that shout loudest simply make the biggest berks of themselves.

     

    The grubby groper Ghislaine Maxwell and the mendacious minx that is the Duchess of Sussex should take note – employing trolls simply puts you in the same league as the racist Tommy Robinson. Now please girls, pipe down and play nicely.

     

    Pictured top (left to right) – A covered in milkshake Tommy Robinson, a contemplative Ghislaine Maxwell and a seriously smug Duchess of Sussex.

     

    Fake-Followers
    Plastic-anything-but-fantastic Omid Scobie, like the equally off-his-merry-rocker chump Christopher Bouzy, peddles poison and lies for the Duchess of Sussex. He is not a journalist, but in fact someone who encourages gross mistruths about other members of the royal family to be spread. Whilst the rest of the world condemned the wicked wench formerly known as Meghan Markle for her ludicrous ‘Archetypes’ podcast, in his ‘Yahoo!Life’ column Scobie raged: “Once silenced by the establishment, it’s clear that Meghan finally has her voice back. A voice that will be very familiar to those who followed her before Harry. This time, however, she’s brought an entire movement alongside it.” No doubt his huge number of “fake” followers adored that gibberish.

    Example Troll – @terinalucy1972 (Presumably actually named Lucy Terina)

    The not-so-lovely London based Lucy Terina unsurprisingly backs Brexit and as well as hash-tagging that also adds: #Borisismasterofbrexit. That’s she a big fan of Tommy Robinson leads to only one conclusion about this brazen bigot and that is: “How terribly predictable.”

    Example Troll – @cbouzy (Christopher Bouzy, BotSentinel)

    ‘Blue ticked’ by Twitter in spite of being nothing but a nasty piece of toerag, Christopher Bouzy targets anyone who dares speak out against those he’d love to be more closely involved with – namely the Duchess of Sussex and Amber Heard. He has a past clearly chequered and peppered with questionable episodes. It’s no surprise that one of Ghislaine Maxwell’s favoured mouthpieces, Jay Beecher, associates with him.

  • Moron of the Moment 2022 – Maniac PR Peddler Omid Scobie

    Moron of the Moment 2022 – Maniac PR Peddler Omid Scobie

    In yet again making it all about his anything but sorry self and tittle-tattling about his delusional worries about his personal security, the PR peddler for the Duchess of Sussex that is the maniac Omid Scobie yet again shows himself as nothing but a prized pillock and prat

    Some people make it their life’s work to laud those that do good whilst others make it their life’s work to bring down those that behave improperly. In many ways both sets of people – and some fall into both categories variously – are to be celebrated, but then there are those that simply have to connect anything to their not at all relevant in any way to anything narrative’s to themselves.

     

    Unsurprisingly yet again showing himself as the ultimate example of such yesterday, the rotten-to-his-core PR peddler for the Duchess of Sussex that is the maniac Omid Scobie turned a story about who ought to pay for royal security into a fantasy about his worries about his own personal security.

     

    In a rabid rant for Yahoo! News, the – just like the deranged duchess he so toadily cosies up to – the one-time mate of the glamour model Jodie Marsh whinged and whined and then whimpered:

     

    “I witness a lot myself, too. Thanks to a never-ending stream of false tabloid tales calling me the couple’s ‘close friend’ or ‘spokesman,’ I regularly receive an extension of their online threats. The messages range from extreme racism to disturbingly violent scenes involving the likes of dismemberment, car accidents and rape. They always get forwarded to the police.”

     

    Deservedly called out on many an occasion by amongst others The Steeple Times favourite Sadie Quinlan (AKA ‘Yankee Wally’), the leading apologist for the drippy Duke and Duchess of Sussex revealed earlier this month that he’d be dribbling out more drivel on behalf of the delusional duo in a new book to be published by Harper Collins.

     

    Clearly aimed at countering the deserved hatchet job done by Tom Bower’s Revenge: Meghan, Harry and the War between the Windsors, this as yet untitled tittle-tattling trash, according to its avaricious author, will focus on “a new chapter of the royal story and feature unique insight, deep access and exclusive revelations… [that will] have the world talking.”

     

    Desperate to scavenge anything he can from the car wreck that is the frankly increasingly boring ‘story’ of the modern day ‘Mr and Mrs Wallis Simpson,’ Scobie should (but of course won’t) finally realise one thing: The world’s laughing at this ludicrous arse-licker and not with him and his birdbrained bosses. It’s time all three of them did something else: It’s high time the lot of them bloody well bogged off.

     

    Prince Harry security
    “The safety of others should never be up for debate” pontificated the ‘Finding Freedom’ author whilst sharing his latest bag of bilge. He pompously ended: “Reinstate Harry’s security at his own expense – before it’s too late.” Clearly a crackpot crazy conspiracy theorist, what does this berk expect to happen to the couple he has made a career out of arselicking? A car crash? Murder at the Montecito mansion Manson style? Them eaten alive by a lion?
    In August 2020, the ‘Daily Mail’ shared that plastic-not-fantastic Omid previously worked at gossip magazine ‘Heat’ and partied with the ‘glamour model’ Jodie Marsh. They mentioned how somebody had “airbrushed” Meghan Markle’s “entry on the online encyclopedia Wikipedia… to include more flattering details days before her romance with Prince Harry became public” and illustrated the ‘Finding Freedom’ author’s “drastic transformation” in two very different photographs. Maniac Scobie is someone who most definitely would like his past forgotten, but here again we remind him that he’s actually just a two-faced twerp.
    Fake Followers
    An analysis of maniac Omid Scobie’s Twitter feed clearly shows that a large proportion of his followers are a bit like himself: FAKE.
    Watching
    Illustrating his clearly delusional desperation for attention, the ‘Finding Freedom’ author recently took to Twitter to declare: “Know that if I’m quiet at the moment, it’s because I’m busy writing – (and it feels so nice to be able to finally admit that!)… I’m always watching though.” Who on earth does this blabbering bozo think he is? MI5?
    Richard Eden
    On 4th August, the day the wicked wench formerly known as Meghan Markle turned maybe 41 or maybe 45, the both witty and wise ‘Daily Mail’ diarist Richard Eden tweeted: “Happy birthday to the Duchess of Sussex, who’s 41 today, or as Omid Scobie would put it, 31. #MeghanMarkle.”

    Can anyone solve a problem like ‘MeGain’?

    • In November 2021, the duchess was forced to apologise to the Appeal Court in London for making a misleading statement in her privacy case against The Mail on Sunday’s publishers.
    • Her very own father, Thomas, has called out her many untruths about him and others again, again and again.
    • Of her claiming having got married the day before she actually did, Mr Markle stated: “Lying about the archbishop? How can you say: ‘We’ve been married three days before we got married’? Her lies are so obvious, I don’t know why she says them.”
    • Her very own half-sister, Samantha, who is currently bringing a defamation case against her, has called her out as a liar on multiple occasions also. It has been proven that the duchess’s claim that she hasn’t seen her sibling in over 20 years was proven untrue when a photo of the pair 13 years ago emerged.
    • Her very own half-brother, Thomas Jr., said of her: “I told Prince Harry, I think she’s going to ruin your life. She’s very shallow… She’s a phony, a bully, a jaded, shallow, conceited woman.”
    • The former Meghan Markle has been called out on multiple occasions for spinning stories against other members of the royal family, most especially the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge.
    • Staff who’ve worked for her have complained that she is a bully and investigations into this remain ongoing.
    • The Duchess of Sussex is a known manipulator of the press and paparazzis and it has been claimed that she’ll “twist the truth” to get any headline she wants.
    • Questions remain as to how many times she’s actually been married in total. Some say twice, some say thrice. Any answer to such allegations, ‘MeGain’?
    • Who did this wicked wench meet first? Prince Andrew or Prince Harry?
    • Was the Duchess of Sussex ever associated in any way with Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell in the 2000s and 2010s?
    • What exactly defines the relationship between the Duchess of Sussex and Omid Scobie and Markus Anderson? Is it social, financial or is there something more to it?
    • “Would you trust this woman with a bargepole?” is something often asked of this money motivated minx.

     

  • Knickers In A Twist – Harry’s £800k Pants – Royal Underpants For Auction

    Knickers In A Twist – Harry’s £800k Pants – Royal Underpants For Auction

    Former Las Vegas stripper attempts to auction drippy Prince Harry’s black underpants for the ludicrous sum of £800,000; who on earth would want these soiled goods?

    Whilst interest in Tom Bower’s book on them, Revenge: Meghan, Harry and the war between the Windsors, continues to ignite the passions of the Twitterati in spite of it actually revealing very little new, a former Las Vegas stripper is now selling a pair of black underpants Prince Charles’s second son gave her in August 2012 because she quite rightly believes he’s become a “bore.”

     

    Set to be auctioned on 17th August this year at the Hustler Club in Las Vegas, what the Mirror described as a “raunchy keepsake” have been guided at £800,000 ($963,000, €942,000 or درهم3.5 million) along with the dress and swimsuit worn by British born Carrie Reichert (now known as ‘Carrie Royale’ and formerly nicknamed ‘Lady Dominique’) on the occasion when she met a man she dubbed then “fun Harry.”

     

    Speaking of why she is selling now, 43-year-old Reichert told the paper:

     

    “Harry has become such a bore, it’s a real shame. When he partied in Vegas, everyone loved him and his sense of fun. At least these pants are a reminder of what he used to be like… when Harry was the fun prince.”

     

    “It’s a shame he’s all po-faced and serious these days. Even as a married dad of two, he should still let his hair down now and again – what’s left of it any way.”

     

    Elsewhere dubbed “miserable and pompous” following his speech last week to a virtually empty room at the United Nations on Mandela Day, the Duke of Sussex continues to cause trouble for his relatives. This morning, the MailOnline’s Stewart Case shared news that the royal renegade “is reported to have completed his eagerly awaited autobiography.

     

    Of it, Case claimed “publisher Random House is aiming for the book to be out in time for the Thanksgiving and Christmas Holidays, when it could be marketed as a gift.” Frankly, who on earth would want it – apart from ‘MeGain’ and perhaps also PR peddler Omid Scobie?

     

    Pictured top – An especially unkempt and miserable looking Duke of Sussex at the United Nations in New York last week with his very ambitious crackpot wife sat alongside looking, as ever, as if she is the cat that well and truly got the cream.

     

    Carrie Reichert Carrie Royale
    Of the underwear story, ‘The Sun’ ran today with the headline: “Get ‘Em Orf’ and shared its previous front page of the royal in the buff – published on Friday 24th August 2012 in “Britain’s most popular paper” as a “souvenir printed edition.”
    UN speech
    The speech by the Duke of Sussex clearly wasn’t exactly welcomed at the United Nations given how many empty seats there were when he got up to ramble and rant and interfere in matters that he has no actual qualification. Here is a mouse-not-a-man who is, a bit like Boris Johnson, controlled by his pugnacious puppet mistress. What a shame that this once “fun loving” has become nothing but a drip and a hypocrite who brings nothing but shame on his relatives.
    Soulmate and Inmate Duke and Duchess of Sussex
    Twitter users compared the Duke of Sussex to an “inmate” and referenced his wife – who notably kept grabbing him by the hand during their visit to the UN in a most controlling fashion – as a “soulmate.” Frankly, they’d have done better to term her “prison governess.”
    Miserable
    Whilst the wicked wastrel woman formerly known as Meghan Markle looked utterly smug during their appearance in New York, her husband sat looking utterly trapped. The expression on his face was not of a man happy with his lot, but one of someone who looks utterly trapped. Life in America and away from his caring family clearly does not suit this spoilt little twerp and at some point, most likely, he will definitely try and escape.
  • Scobie’s Childish Clownery Backfires

    Scobie’s Childish Clownery Backfires

    MeGain’s nodding dog PR peddler Omid Scobie claims “clownery” forced him to delete a tweet deemed by many “hateful” to a 4-year-old child, Prince Louis

    After beginning his stint at Yahoo! News with a nonsensical “800-word rant” in May, the plastic-not-fantastic ‘Megamouthed Montecito Meddler’ that is Omid Scobie twisted his already leaky pen again last week with a feature titled: “Thomas Markle turned on his own daughter – Meghan owes him nothing.”

     

    As ever, shockingly written and peppered with his trademark use of “snark” and “toxic,” the ‘author’ of the bag of bilge that is Finding Freedom concluded of “publicity-hungry” Mr Markle: “Meghan doesn’t owe him a damn thing” after effectively suggesting that Prince Harry’s wife for now’s father was “conveniently captured” by paparazzi as he arrived at a California hospital after having a stroke.

     

    Aside from being unnecessarily insulting to a clearly unwell man – who he alleged also tells “twisted tales” and has supported “single-purpose-hate accounts about his daughter” – Scobie simply showed himself as ridiculous. Going further, this PR peddler continued in the same vein and yesterday in a tweet about the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge’s son, Prince Louis, again made a total prat of himself.

     

    Later deleted after he was widely condemned for picking on a 4-year-old child, accompanying an image of the clearly nothing but playful youngster, Scobie wrote: “I did wonder why Prince Louis was taken out for a while. Kids will be kids, eh?”

     

    Obviously a pointed jibe that aimed at hinting that the behaviour of the children of the House of Cambridge and the parenting skills of the heir to the throne and his wife are looked on differently to those of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, Scobie was subsequently asked: “Why did you delete your tweet?”

     

    His response – called out as “crying victim” – read: “Because despite turning off comments (something I now try to do on any tweet about royal children), there was negativity in the quote tweets and also some insane trolls claiming ‘kids will be kids, eh?’ is ‘inciting hate.’ I’m tired and have no time or patience for clownery.”

     

    Predictably once again here is a circa 40-year-old mouthy-mouse-not-a-man who throws his toys out of the pram when criticised; equally, shown up by a 4-year-old child, here is a proof that Scobie likes to give it out but he most certainly has again proven he can’t take it back. This gobby gadabout ought to learn to think before he tweets and leave commentary to real journalists and grownups.

     

    OS Tweet 1
    This tweet by the ‘Finding Freedom’ lasted less than a couple of hours. It was widely condemned as a “pointed jibe” and “offensive” and some went as far as to say it simply showed this PR peddler for the ‘House of Montecito’ to be a nasty piece of toerag and a pot stirring troublemaker.
    OS Tweet 2
    Asked why he deleted the missive, pathetic pontificater Scobie threw his toys out of the pram and declared: “I’m tired and have no time or patience for clownery.” In doing so, he simply illustrated himself to be anything but thoughtful in his communications and skilled at nothing but drawing attention to himself by any means.
    Response 1
    “Crying victim,” however, did not work out well for him and instead other Twitter users remarked of their view that he is the one “enabling hate” and “encouraging hate online against children.” He would have been wise not to have embarked on such a course of action in the first place, but having done so, his back peddling proved even more disastrous.
    Richard Eden
    The ‘Daily Mail’s’ Richard Eden responded to last week’s ‘Yahoo! News’ article by suggesting that it is “the royal family [who owe] Meghan nothing” rather than her owing her father nothing.
    OS Tweet 3
    Bragging about his article on 31st May on Twitter, the former ‘Heat’ magazine columnist and sometime mate of the titty flashing ‘glamour model’ Jodie Marsh called out the Duchess of Sussex’s father as a “toxic parent” who “has a long history of causing stress, anxiety and pain.” He argued: “Cutting them out is often the only answer” in spite of having no known knowledge of psychology.
  • Meg & Amber – A Pugnacious Pair Of Woke Wazzocks Who Should Be Heard Less

    Meg & Amber – A Pugnacious Pair Of Woke Wazzocks Who Should Be Heard Less

    Both blubbing bed sh*tter Amber Heard and boring botherer the Duchess of Sussex should be heard less and ignored more; it is time to cancel these woke wazzocks

    Audacious and awful Amber Heard is an actress and so used to be the wicked wench formerly known as Meghan Markle. Here, indeed, is a pair who are very similar and in both of them this week we’ve seen yet more shameless attention seeking.

     

    Whilst Johnny Depp’s clearly crackers ex blubbed in court and was made an utter berk of by Kate Moss over her clear lies, that the Duchess of Sussex decided to visit a town in Texas she has utterly no connection with is just plain wrong.

     

    The grieving families of those so disgustingly shot by a deranged madman do not need or require a visit from a woman who forced her husband to quit his royal duties to seek privacy. Her presence, instead, was nothing but wrong in all senses and that she turned up to profiteer with her camera crew in tow was beyond reprehensible.

     

    The Duke and Duchess of Sussex might believe Netflix’s cash to be their future; it will soon be their deserved undoing. Shame on them and shame on bed sh*tter Amber Heard also.

     

    Duchess of Sussex Netflix
    The deranged diva’s decision to use a tragedy for her own PR purposes was rightly slammed on social media. That she stood looking over photographers sums up how self-serving this dreadful toerag truly is.
    Meghan Markle
    If the Duchess of Sussex had wished to support the families of the victims of the Uvalde shootings, she could have sent a donation. Instead, she used this tragedy for her very own benefit. Shame on her.
    Johnny Depp
    Meanwhile elsewhere in the Fairfax County Courthouse in Virginia, Johnny Depp looked on as his ex-lover Kate Moss proved Amber Heard nothing but a loopy liar yesterday.

    Can anyone solve a problem like ‘MeGain’?

    • In November 2021, the duchess was forced to apologise to the Appeal Court in London for making a misleading statement in her privacy case against The Mail on Sunday’s publishers.
    • Her very own father, Thomas, has called out her many untruths about him and others again, again and again.
    • Of her claiming having got married the day before she actually did, Mr Markle stated: “Lying about the archbishop? How can you say: ‘We’ve been married three days before we got married’? Her lies are so obvious, I don’t know why she says them.”
    • Her very own half-sister, Samantha, has called her out as a liar on multiple occasions also. It has been proven that the duchess’s claim that she hasn’t seen her sibling in over 20 years was proven untrue when a photo of the pair 13 years ago emerged.
    • Her very own half-brother, Thomas Jr., said of her: “I told Prince Harry, I think she’s going to ruin your life. She’s very shallow… She’s a phony, a bully, a jaded, shallow, conceited woman.”
    • The former Meghan Markle has been called out on multiple occasions for spinning stories against other members of the royal family, most especially the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge.
    • Staff who’ve worked for her have complained that she is a bully and investigations into this remain ongoing.
    • The Duchess of Sussex is a known manipulator of the press and paparazzis and it has been claimed that she’ll “twist the truth” to get any headline she wants.
    • Questions remain as to how many times she’s actually been married in total. Some say twice, some say thrice.
    • “Would you trust this woman with a bargepole?” is something often asked of this money motivated minx.

     

    ‘Buzzfeed’ botherer Ellie Hall claimed a “scoop” on the story of the mendacious meddling minx that is the decided drip Prince Harry’s wicked wastrel wife visiting the scene of a massacre. She announced: “SCOOP: Meghan, the Duchess of Sussex, traveled to Uvalde, Texas, where she donated food to a community blood drive center and visited a memorial for the victims of the deadly school shooting.”
    Piers Morgan rightly said of the “self-promoting” visit: “I don’t know why she’s there?”
  • Restraining Poundland Pikey Pricey 2022 – Katie Price Faces Jail

    Restraining Poundland Pikey Pricey 2022 – Katie Price Faces Jail

    As Katie Price is finally forced to face the prospect of jail for breaching a restraining order, we suggest it is time this “gutter slag” grew up

    ‘Poundland Pikey’ Katie Price likes to call other women “gutter slags.” She, in fact, is one herself and now faced with jail for breaching a restraint order, this bombastic braindead bird may finally be taught a clearly very necessary behavioural lesson.

     

    ‘Five by Three’ Miss Price – a 44-year-old mother of five children by three dads – was arrested in January for breaching a restraining order and previously has been charged with drink driving and described as having “one of the worst driving records ever seen.”

     

    Associated mostly now with the words “troubled” and “trash,” this boozed-up binbag has at least 21 offences linked to her name and is likely “at risk of receiving an immediate custodial sentence” once sentencing occurs next month. She has been rightly labelled “nasty” and “vile” and her “foul mouthed tirades of abuse” are frankly what she’ll ultimately only be remembered for.

     

    Aside from speeding offences, flipping a car whilst drunk and ignoring letters from the police, this plastic-not-fantastic wench has repeatedly stuck her plastic-not-fantastic fingers up to the law now on one occasion too many. It is time for Katie Price to be locked up and locked up not only for the safety of others; it is time that Katie Price is given a dose of gruel and reminded that she ought not be considered above the law.

     

    Carl Woods
    Katie Price arriving at Lewes Crown Court with her fiancé Carl Woods on Wednesday.
    Drunk 1
    Social media users reacted to the anything but glamorous ‘glamour model’s’ current situation by demanding she be “jailed for her own good” after her latest court appearance over calling her ex-husband’s fiancée a “gutter slag.” One Twitter user remarked: “She’s had more than enough chances to stop her destructive behaviour. I feel sorry for her kids.”
    Drunk 2
    After pleading guilty, Judge Stephen Mooney told the mouthy mother of five: “Clearly you have accepted for an offence and pleaded guilty and you are aware you committed the offence while on a suspended sentence and are at risk of going to prison.”
    Mucky Mansion
    In 2012, we were somewhat more charitable about “mucky mansion” dwelling Miss Price in remarking: “This glamour model is to be commended for having made a fortune. Her taste in men and cars however is utterly lacking. Her pink Range Rover is perhaps symbolic of all that is wrong about her.” In the time since, this British Pounland equivalent of Paris Hilton has sadly morphed into a reprehensible ratbag and turned her life into a trash can of sleaze and sordidness. One has to pity her poor children for being forced to put up with a succession of trashy men and their messed up mother’s frankly revolting antics.

    Twitter reacts to the Brighton born ‘Page 3 Girl’s’ latest travails:

    Twitter 1
    Twitter user Reece Sanford labelled the ‘Five by Three’ a “vile slapper” and asked: “Is this vile slapper just allowed to get away with anything?”
    Twitter 2
    Another account pointed to Carl Woods’s Mercedes-Benz G-Wagen having illegal front window tinting. They could also have remarked on his ghastly outfit and his hideous barnet.
    Twitter 3
    Twitter user ‘Tommy H’ demanded that this serial offender ends up in prison and suggested: “This woman seems to do whatever the f**k she wants.”
    Twitter 4
    Another, Tessa Rose surmised: “9 driving offences, 6 driving bans and still driving illegal. Not to mention restraining order and her stint in rehab.” She added: “As she repeatedly keeps driving without a licence, she’s not remorseful and won’t ever learn.”
    Twitter 5
    ‘Eric Eats Pickles’ raged: “Does she have to kill someone to get banned?” and added: “One of the worst driving records I have ever seen.” We could add: “Wouldn’t it have been cheaper and more sensible for this silly bint to have just employed a chauffeur?”