Category: Sarah, Duchess of York

Tall Tales At The Telegraph – Newspaper Taken In By Yet More Lies From Ian Maxwell About That Infamous Bathtub Bonk
As ‘The Telegraph’ falls for tall tales from mucky madam Ghislaine Maxwell’s brother Ian Maxwell about Prince Andrew’s infamous “bathtub bonk” at her home, we remind readers of the truth about that standard sized tub

“It’s the most peculiar photograph I’ve ever seen on a front page” raged Justin Webb on Radio 4’s Today programme this morning. Mr Webb, was referencing the day’s cover of The Telegraph and was talking of a story peddled to the rag-no-longer-a-readable paper by the nutty-not-nice Ian Maxwell, brother of the incarcerated noxious nonce Ghislaine Maxwell.

Going further of this clear episode of an editor gone bonkers, Labour MP Chris Bryant asked on Twitter: “Is it 1^st April? Was the whole editorial team on acid?” of an article by Robert Mendick and Victoria Ward that was titled: “The photo that ‘clears Duke [of York]’ over bath sex.”

In said piece, the pontificating and pointless paper shared an image of two people sitting in the first-floor bathtub at Ghislaine Maxwell’s former home at 44 Kinnerton Street, Belgravia, London with images of Virginia Roberts Giuffre and Prince Andrew in place of their faces. Bizarre it most definitely was, but newsworthy it was not.

If that was not weird enough, Mendick and Ward then chose to quote Ian Maxwell as if he were some kind of reliable source. The nutjob ranted:

“I am releasing my photos now because the truth needs to come out. They show the truth that the bath is too small for any sort of sex frolicking.”

“The whole of Virginia Giuffre’s case pivots upon a photograph taken more than 20 years ago at my sister’s former house in Kinnerton Street, in Belgravia.”

“It proves nothing. Prince Andrew and my sister think it’s a fake, but I take the view that it’s irrelevant. It just shows that Prince Andrew had his arms around a girl who wanted a photograph, as she has said herself, ‘to show to her mother.’”

“Ghislaine was in custody, and shortly after the picture was taken, the mews house was sold.”

“[Giuffre’s] story relating to having had sex in the bath dates back many years, and the obvious time to put it to her that the bath is too small and makes sex impossible was at the trial. But Virginia Giuffre was never called to give evidence, and the photo never came to light.”

“But her admission that her claim of having sex with Alan Dershowitz may be mistaken and therefore untrue, and given Prince Andrew is considering appealing the settlement, it seemed in the context of that the correct moment to release the images.”

“Prince Andrew has been completely cancelled on the basis of the allegations…The truth really does need to come out. If this photo is helpful in achieving that, then that is what this is all about.”

In January 2022, in a world exclusive subsequently picked up by the Daily Mail also, The Steeple Times revealed the first ever known photograph of the aforementioned bathroom and that this image showed this tub to be exactly what it is – full sized and thus perfectly capable of being a space in which two people could fool around and fornicate.

Prior to this latest release of what should be condemned as nothing but fake news, on 25^th January, Epstein victim lawyer Lisa Bloom tweeted of the matter:

“So important. Prince Andrew’s reported new effort to worm out of the settlement he signed comes just as his buddy Ghislaine Maxwell says Virginia’s photo with Andrew is faked. But OTHER PHOTOS. And she looks like such a little girl in the photo on right. Because she was.”

Editor’s Note – Unlike as is the case in many publications, this article was NOT sponsored or supported by a third-party.

Pictured Top – ‘The Telegraph’s’ front page on Saturday 28^th January and their soppy source, the swivel-eyed half-witted fruitcake Ian Maxwell; that this paper has been taken in by this nutcase is just further proof that this once respectable publication has well and truly gone to the dogs.

When asked about what occurred on the night of 10th March 2001 in the first floor bathroom at her Kinnerton Street mews house, Ghislaine Maxwell responded: “[Virginia Roberts] then characterized [sic] things took place in my bathroom in the bathtub itself. The tub is too small for any kind of activity whatsoever.” The picture of that very same tub used in marketing material by Wellbelove Quested proves exactly to the contrary.

The floor plan shared by the likes ‘The Daily Mail’ and ‘The Sun suggested the first-floor bathroom at the house to be 7-foot, 4 inches by 7-foot, 2-inches. Floor plans shared by estate agents Wellboved Quested suggested that the room is actually 8-foot, 4-inches by 8-foot, 2-inches. There was most definitely plenty of room for two…

A floorplan of 44 Kinnerton Street, Belgravia. In it, mucky madam Ghislaine Maxwell’s home is clearly shown to be a place where ‘public’ entertaining took place on the ground floor, whilst ‘extracurricular’ activities took place on the upper two floors.

These photographs of 44 Kinnerton Street, taken in July 2021, provide proof that the bannisters seen in the March 2001 photographs remain inside said property. The setting in which Prince Andrew and Virginia Roberts were captured was indeed most definitely genuine. In the same month, the new owners of the property displayed a poster at 44 Kinnerton Street for a festival that was to be held in East Anglia from 31st July 2021 to 1st August 2021. The event, the EA Festival, was hosted at Hedingham Castle – home to Jason and Demetra Lindsay – in Essex and had a line-up that included model and advocate Arizona Muse, film director Mike Figgis, ‘Countdown’s’ Susie Dent, sex commentator Rowan Pelling and comedian Josh Berry. The same open doorway also showed something else… The very same bannister that was shown in the photograph Prince Andrew, Virginia Robert and Ghislaine Maxwell appeared in.

This morning on Twitter, Matthew Steeples asked: “Why is Ian Maxwell, brother of Ghislaine Maxwell, trying to make out that the bathtub at her former home at 44 Kinnerton Street, Belgravia too small for Prince Andrew & Virginia Roberts Giuffre to have had sex in? I proved it was of normal size last year.” The majority of respondents thus far have taken the view that “he’s working for Prince Andrew.”

In November 2020, ‘The Steeple Times’ featured bathtub mats featuring Prince Andrew’s face and the caption “nonce” that were available for sale through Redbubble.com. Priced then at £23.61 ($32.30, €28.29 or درهم118.61), these 61cm by 43cm polyester microfiber items clearly proved very popular as they are no longer on the site. Clearly, there is a market for bathtub memorabilia that references the Queen’s supposed favourite son.

THAT 2001 Photo Thus Far NOT PROVEN A FAKE – The 10th March 2001 photograph of Prince Andrew, Virginia Roberts and Ghislaine Maxwell

The photograph, taken supposedly by Jeffrey Epstein on the first floor landing at 44 Kinnerton Street, Belgravia, London, SW1X 8ES, United Kingdom, has been shared by the world’s media in hundreds of thousands of articles and analysed countless times by countless experts.

In November 2019, the Daily Mail’s Inderdeep Bains called it: “The photograph that WON’T go away” and it, as of date, has NEVER been discredited. Amongst evidence suggesting it to be perfectly real is that:
- The setting of the photograph has been confirmed as genuine by the Maxwell family. Of it, in March 2021, Ian Maxwell told Radio 4’s Today programme: “I do recognise that setting.”
- The window in the picture has the same features as the front first floor windows of 44 Kinnerton Street.
- The width of the first floor landing is accurate to the measurements shown in the floor plan of the sales brochure prepared on the 14^th October 2021 by estate agents Wellbelove Quested.
- Though he claimed to be “at a loss to explain this particular photograph” during the 2019 BBC interview, the Duke of York has admitted to having visited 44 Kinnerton Street. He stated: “I don’t think I think ever went upstairs… The dining room and everything was on the ground floor.” Contradicting the royal, sources have claimed that the room behind him, Roberts and Maxwell in the photograph was used as a sitting room.
- The heights of all three individuals in the picture look to be accurate proportionately.
- Prince Andrew’s “chubby fingers” are clear to see. The Queen’s second son’s fingers are clearly “chubby fingers” and these very same “chubby fingers” have been seen hundreds of thousands of times in hundreds of thousands of other photographs.
- Prince Andrew has claimed he only ever goes out in London in a suit and tie. Images of him in open necked shirts in the capital – including one of him leaving the nightclub Chinawhite – prove to the contrary.
- Prince Andrew has claimed he does not “do” hugs and and embraces in photographs. Images of him taken in St Tropez embracing the US socialite Chris Von Aspen in July 2007 suggest the alleged non-sweater is wrong also on that score.
- The outfit worn by Virginia Roberts – a woman who has already received financial settlements from Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell – has been seen on her in photographs of her at Naomi Campbell’s 2001 birthday party in France. In spite of some suggestions that a lady only wears an outfit once, we counter that a lady in Miss Roberts’ unfortunate situation would be forced to wear what she was told appealed to those in control of her wished her to wear.
- Matthew Steeples of The Steeple Times and Shaun Attwood of Shaun Attwood’s True Crime Channel have both seen inside 44 Kinnerton Street and the stair rail shown in the photo remains in place and is thus genuine to the setting. Attwood subsequently released film footage of this on his YouTube channel and The Steeple Times shared its most recent image of the open front door with the stair rail beyond in July 2021.
- Many experts have repeatedly stated photo manipulation was in its infancy at the time that this image first surfaced.
- The FBI have never questioned the authenticity of the image.
Twitter reacts to ‘The Telegraph’ being taken in by Ian Maxwell’s tall-tales…

The Names & Numbers – ‘Mucky Madam Ghislaine Maxwell’s Bathtub Bonk Pad’ – 44 Kinnerton Street, Belgravia, London, SW1X 8ES, United Kingdom
- 28^th January 2023 – Valued at £2.317 million ($2.871 million, €2.641 million or درهم10.544 million) on TheMoveMarket.com, a sum 32.4% higher than the April 2021 sale price and a sum 503.4% higher than the January 1997 sale price.
- 14^th January 2022 – Property website TheMoveMarket.com values the house at £2.11 million ($2.88 million, €2.53 million or درهم59 million), a sum 19% lower than the current asking price for the unrenovated property.
- January 2022 – Estate agents Wellbelove Quested offer the mews house for £2.6 million ($3.6 million, €3.1 million or درهم1 million), an extraordinary increase of 49% on the sale price just 270 days earlier. The house is offered on a lease of 127 years that commenced on 24^th June 2014 and previously on their website Wellbelove Quested had marketed the house for a higher price of £2.75 million ($3.738 million, €3.283 million or درهم13.731 million).
- July 2021 – The Steeple Times reports on repainting work to the outside of the house being underway. An open door reveals the infamous staircase bannister to still be in-situ.
- 19^th April 2021 – Records confirm the house to have been sold for £1.75 million ($2.39 million, €2.09 million or درهم79 million).
- March 2021 – Ghislaine Maxwell’s lawyer offered cash from the “pending sale of her £1.45 million ($2 million, €1.74 million or درهم28 million)” home as part of a package when they sought bail for the mucky madam for a third time, the Daily Mail reported. This sum was 44% lower than the September 2020 asking price and 400% higher than the January 1997 purchase price.
- March 2021 – A Knightsbridge estate agent told The Steeple Times: “Knowing the street as I do, 44 is one of the smaller houses which I assume it to be a little over 1,000 square foot in size. Depending on the condition, I estimate the freehold value to be circa £1.8 million to £2 million ($2.5 million to $2.7 million, €2.2 million to €2.4 million or 9درهم million to درهم10 million).”
- December 2020 – Members of the Maxwell family attempted to raise finance on the property but are not successful, The Steeple Times learns from a financier with connections to the Maxwell family and their representatives. They were rejected, were rejected on the basis of the “toxicity” of their familial name.
- September 2020 – Estate agents Aylesford list 44 Kinnerton Street for sale for £2.6 million ($3.6 million, €3.1 million or درهم1 million) on (it was claimed) a freehold basis, a sum 797% than the January 1997 purchase price. They subsequently later reduce the asking price to £2.1 million ($2.9 million, €2.5 million or درهم10.5 million) “according to a leading property expert.”
- August 2019 – According to Insider, a woman with “long hair [who] appeared to be in her 60s” was seen entering the property. She “denied that the socialite owns or lived in the house, claiming instead that the elusive socialite lived elsewhere down the street.”
- 10^th March 2001 – Prince Andrew allegedly had sexual relations with 17-year-old Virginia Roberts in a bathroom in the property. He continues to deny this occurred whilst claiming that a photograph of himself with Miss Roberts and Ghislaine Maxwell on the first floor of building is a fake also.
- 22^nd January 1997 – Ghislaine Maxwell paid £290,000 ($396,000, €347,000 or درهم5 million) for the three-storey leasehold mews house. It is situated at the heart of the Duke of Westminster’s Grosvenor Estate.
- 1989 to 1995 – Ghislaine Maxwell is known to have resided at 69 Stanhope Mews East, South Kensington, London, SW7 5QT. Her father bought it for her two years before his mysterious death and she reportedly “groomed and befriended Minor Victim 3 in London, England, between approximately 1994 and 1995… Maxwell introduced Minor Victim 3 to Epstein and during those interactions, Maxwell encouraged Minor Victim 3 to massage Epstein, knowing that Epstein would engage in sex acts with Minor Victim 3. During those massages, Epstein sexually abused Minor Victim 3” at that very property. It was sold for £267,000 ($365,000, €320,000 or درهم3 million) on 15^th March 1995 and then again for £1.75 million ($2.39 million, €2.10 million or درهم8.77 million) on 30^th August 2019.
January 28, 2023
Scobie’s Scuttled – Has Meghan Markle Ditched Boring Blabber Omid Scobie?

Has the Duchess of Sussex ditched boring blabber Omid Scobie and will his forthcoming ‘book’ just prove to be another bag of bilge?

Just as it has been revealed that Virginia Roberts Giuffre – the woman who received a sum estimated as anything upto £9.7 million ($12 million, €11 million or درهم44.1 million) from a man she never met if you believe his narrative, Prince Andrew – is about to pen her memoirs, a very boring blabber is preparing to blab yet again also.

Currently, Omid Scobie is doing the rounds (or what what he prefers to bombastically term “the beat”) talking about his forthcoming tittle-tattling tome which is to be titled Endgame. The sequel to the bag of bilge that was Finding Freedom will be published on 1^st August and though this sapless spiv is clearly beginning early on his pontificating, promotional rounds, what is clear is that he has likely been scuttled by his puppet mistress, the currently ‘missing,’ mendacious menace formerly known as Meghan Markle.

In comments to the self-declared “polymath” Micheal Timilehin Omoniyi yesterday shared in a 0:34-minute video clip released on Twitter whilst wearing a baseball cap, Scobie whined:

“[The Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s] mere existence, their mere story has raised issues about misogyny within the institution and the monarchy; about unconscious bias and racism. And I know how Harry called it ‘unconscious bias,’ but I’m still going to call it racism because I think that it is only not racist when it’s unconscious. The second someone makes it conscious to you and you try and minimise it or skirt the topic or ‘recollections may vary’ it, that is racism… Even me saying that makes people feel uncomfortable.”

Speaking in September 2021, the British-Persian ‘journalist’ and boring blabber had described his last known encounter with the duke and duchess as involving a “big farewell hug.” Going further, at that time, he cringeworthily claimed: “Meghan told him: ‘It didn’t have to be this way.’ I think she wanted to share that last moment because it is a moment in history, but also to do it in an environment she felt safe in.”

Tellingly of the twaddle he’s subsequently peddled, the dimwitted dunce added in comments reported in The Independent: “He said he doesn’t ‘even know if the Sussexes like me, to be honest,’ adding that ‘press is press.’”

Updating the situation on Tuesday, the Daily Express’s Emma Crabtree turned to Prince Harry “accusing Scobie of writing ‘utter nonsense’ about Meghan’s fake kidnapping” and “lying” about a story he included in Finding Freedom about a “staged kidnapping.”

Commenting on this in the article, GB News host Dan Wootton “accused Scobie of being a sycophant to the shunned Sussexes by calling him a ‘hagiographer’ and slammed the authoritative tone of the royal commentator.”

Wootton added: “It all sounds very dramatic doesn’t it, and very authoritative from oddball Scobie… I would say to Scobie, don’t take it personally, after all Harry’s book was a pack of lies too.”

Meanwhile elsewhere yesterday, The Steeple Times was sent a ‘mindmap’ illustrating the links between the alleged ‘yacht girl’ that is the Duchess of Sussex and Prince Andrew and Harvey Weinstein. A fascinating illustration which we share below, this document was first published on a site named Project Fangirl on 18^th November 2022, but where it could go further would be to add in names such as Ghislaine Maxwell, Markus Anderson, Piers Morgan and Scobie himself even. Here, yet again, is proof that the world of ‘MeGain’ is nothing but a murky, mucky mess and one that petulant pillock Prince Harry should never have got himself involved in.

Editor’s Note – Unlike as is the case in many publications, this article was NOT sponsored or supported by a third-party.

Pictured Top – A rather startled Omid Scobie (left) and his puppet mistress the Duchess of Sussex (right) with her allegedly gay ‘bestie’ Markus Anderson.

The ‘mindmap’ detailing the links between the Duchess of Sussex and Harvey Weinstein is a fascinating one and includes the likes of Larry King, Amol Rajan, Rachael Ray, Lindsay Roth and Sunshine Sachs. There is, however, much more to this and many more noxious names deserve to be added; amongst them Markus Anderson, Ghislaine Maxwell and Omid Scobie.

Omid Scobie is most definitely plastic and not fantastic, but how long will he last without his puppet mistress giving him permission to lie on her behalf? Perhaps, in the coming months, this definite ‘melt’ will just melt away and then we can all say: “Good bloody riddance.”

The House of York and the Houses of Paedophiles – In 2006, the pugnacious paedophiles Harvey Weinstein, Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell partied at Windsor Castle with the Duke of York, his ex-wife Sarah, Duchess of York and their two daughters Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie. Did nobody think to do a test on the guest list for criminal perverts? Clearly not.

On 19th December 2016, the dimwitted dunce Sarah, Duchess of York attended a “VIP screening” of ‘Lion’ hosted by Harvey Weinstein and Georgina Chapman at Soho House in London. Whether Markus Anderson arranged this event is unknown, but the former Meghan Markle’s mate Princess Eugenie of York most definitely showed up also.

The friendship between Oprah Winfrey – a regular on the roster of spinners for the Duke and Duchess of Sussex and their deviancy – and Harvey Weinstein cannot be shown to be anything but clear. This picture proves how much the former clearly adored the latter now jailed sex offender.

Omid Scobie has been called out by his old chum’s husband Prince Harry as nothing but a muckspreading teller of untruths. His answer? “Surprise.”

Scobie claims to be “stuck in a fever dream” for now; likely soon, this washed-up wazzock will just be a forgotten syllable in a chapter that the royal family would actually rather just forever forget.

January 26, 2023
UnAppealing Ghislaine – Will Wicked Wench Ghislaine Maxwell Succeed At Appeal?

As mucky madam Ghislaine Maxwell gets a new appeal lawyer in spite of owing a fortune to her previous representatives, journalist Daphne Barak PR peddles for her after posing for pictures with the feckless fool that is the ultimate grifter, Sarah, Duchess of York

It must be noted that scum tends to inevitably float to the top of any pond and that birds of a feather tend to stick together. Examples of such came last week with revelations that Ghislaine Maxwell is now being represented by the pugnacious paedophile Harvey Weinstein’s lawyer and that a PR peddler named Daphne Barak is about to share a new interview with the noxious nonce in the coming days.

Whilst Barak – whom also posed for snaps with she who has never confirmed if she repaid loans taken from the croaked paedophile Jeffrey Epstein, Sarah, Duchess of York last month – was this morning given acreage to promote her ‘interview’ with her old chum of many years in both The Sun on Sunday and The Mail on Sunday, it was Page Six that revealed that Maxwell was becoming “jailbirds of a feather” with her old chum Weinstein after taking on attorney Arthur L. Aidala.

Maxwell (AKA prisoner 02879-509), who is now laughably also supposedly currently teaching “etiquette lessons” in the clink if the Independent is to be believed, still owes a sum estimated at £3 million ($3.7 million, €3.4 million or درهم13.5 million) to lawyers previously hired by her, her brother Kevin and her estranged husband Scott Borgerson.

Editor’s Note – Unlike as is the case in many publications, this article was NOT sponsored or supported by a third-party.

Pictured Top – Ghislaine Maxwell with Jeffrey Epstein sat outside a cabin at Balmoral during a visit their when they supposedly met the late Queen even – if Daphne Barak is to be believed. Of this, Barak shares that Maxwell has now declared: “The Queen was one of the most exceptional women I ever had the honour and privilege of meeting.” The convicted sex trafficker added that the monarch had a “sparkle” in her eyes and declared she was “profoundly sorry” to learn of her death last year.

Birds of a rotten feather… The gruesome trio of paedophiles that was Harvey Weinstein, Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell pictured at a party given by he who paid a sum alleged to be as high as £12 million to a woman he claimed he never met, Prince Andrew, at Windsor Castle in 2006.

Arthur L. Aidala is very much of the publicity hungry school of lawyers. Aside from Harvey Weinstein, his firm, Aidala, Bertuna & Kamins, has also represented other mates of Ghislaine Maxwell including Alan Dershowitz. In documents submitted this week, he claimed: “[Maxwell] was malnourished… And yet she’s supposed to sit for a trial [with her] life on the life… In the United States of America, anyone who’s accused of any crime should not be abused by the US government the way she was abused… She did not get a fair trial… The judge ignored the many claims of malnourishment, living with vermin in her cell, lack of sleep, and overall deplorable conditions. There were also issues regarding lack of access to her lawyers. This is all in violation of her fundamental constitutional rights and will be powerfully brought to the attention of the appellate courts.” Of how he came to be involved with the mucky madam and her family, scions of a pension pot plundering tyrant, Aidala added: “After her sentencing… her trial team was done representing her and her family quite frankly reached out to us. Obviously we’d been in the headlines with Mr Weinstein’s case.”

Scotch drinking “Arthur cancels ‘cancel culture’” Aidala – pictured with Harvey Weinstein – was described in a July 2022 article in ‘The New York Times’ as “camera-ready” and “a lawyer who welcomes press attention.” Amongst this registered Democrat’s previous clients are the accused “socialite granny shover” Lauren Pazienza, the crossdressing oddity Rudolph W. Giuliani, cleared “killer crane rigger” William Rapetti, “daddy’s penis chopper-offer” Brigitte Harris and “boyfriend stabber” John Pickett. Of him, Alan Dershowitz tellingly remarked: “Arthur is the new me.”

Daphne Barak pictured in December with Sarah, Duchess of York and with Hillary Clinton – whom she references her as having “hosted” and “supported the presidential bid” of. Here is a ‘journalist’ whose close connections clearly muddy her mind when it comes to interviewing her subjects. Why didn’t this ‘journalist’ ask mucky madam Maxwell about ‘Killary’s’ husband taking at least 27 flights on Jeffrey Epstein’s ‘Lolita Express’ and his convicted sex trafficker co-collaborator attending Chelsea Clinton’s wedding? Curious that; very curious indeed.

Is Ghislaine Maxwell's forthcoming interview with Daphne Barak going to help or hinder her with her appeal (if she manages to get the funds together & a lawyer willing even)? #GhislaineMaxwell #PrinceAndrew #JeffreyEpstein #nonce #sexualabuse #sextrafficking #evil #sick #monster
— Matthew Steeples (@M_Steeples) January 15, 2023

January 15, 2023
MeGain’s Mouthpiece’s Moronic Meltdown – Soppy Omid Scobie v Joyous Jeremy Clarkson

Matthew Steeples salutes Jeremy Clarkson for expressing honest thoughts about the deviant Duchess of Sussex (and especially for causing the soppy snowflake that is ‘MeGain’s mouthpiece Omid Scobie to have a moronic meltdown as a result)

They say a “grifter’s gotta’ grift” and now that Omid Scobie’s been given another book deal courtesy of his ever-awful antics on behalf of his puppet mistress, the Duchess of Sussex, this PR peddling pillock had to yet again get his noxious knickers in a twist.

This time, Jeremy Clarkson – a man who may have finally found a subject of common ground with his love-hate rival Piers Morgan – wrote in The Sun of how much he loathes the meddling menace formerly known as Meghan Markle.

In his weekly column, Clarkson raged:

We all know in our heart of hearts that Harold Markle is a slightly dim but fun-loving chin who flew Apache helicopter gunships in Afghanistan and cavorted around Las Vegas hotel rooms with naked hookers.

But then along came Meghan, who obviously used some vivid bedroom promises to turn him into a warrior of woke.

And now it seems that she has her arm so far up his bottom, she can use her fingers to alter his facial expressions.

I actually feel rather sorry for him because today he’s just a glove puppet with no more control over what he says or does than Basil Brush.

Meghan, though, is a different story. I hate her.

Not like I hate Nicola Sturgeon or Rose West. I hate her on a cellular level.

At night, I’m unable to sleep as I lie there, grinding my teeth and dreaming of the day when she is made to parade naked through the streets of every town in Britain while the crowds chant, “Shame!” and throw lumps of excrement at her.

Everyone who’s my age thinks the same way.

But what makes me despair is that younger people, especially girls, think she’s pretty cool.

They think she was a prisoner of Buckingham Palace, forced to talk about nothing but embroidery and kittens.

That makes me even angrier. Can’t they see everything that’s happening is so very obviously pre-planned.

Leave the UK. Blame the royals. Do an interview with Oprah.

Get Basil Brush to write a book. Do a Netflix series — which should have been called A Woman, Talking Bollocks.

I can see it clearly. The studied pauses. The mock incredulity.

And the B-movie, soap-actress, quivery-voiced, more-in-sorrow-than-anger stories that are so obviously claptrap.

Do you really think she would have entertained a move to New Zealand? That’s 13 hours away from everything.

Responding on Twitter to a feature most definitely designed to stir-up the woke wazzocks of this world, the clearly very much unamused Finding Freedom ‘author’ and fake news muckspreader Scobie – whose next tittle-tattling tome, Endgame, will be speedily headed to the bargain basement bucket after publication on the 1^st August 2023 – continued his ongoing attacks on the Queen Consort. Without using a question mark, the possibly 41-year-old (possibly older) ‘writer’ enquired:

“Would that be the same Jeremy Clarkson was at a private Christmas party with Camilla, the Queen Consort earlier this week (alongside guests including a Mail editor and Piers Morgan).”

Following up later, in a further muddled missive, the onetime clubbing chum of the lump of junk that is Jodie Marsh painfully prattled:

“Timewasters trying to pop up in my mentions saying Clarkson and the Queen Consort are not friends. The man literally spoke about their close friendship on ITV’s cooperative Camilla’s County Life documentary four months ago. Bye.”

Paraphrasing something Jeremy Clarkson once said of Piers Morgan back in December 2012, today we conclude: “Americans. It took us 35 years to get rid of Prince Harry. Please don’t send him or his wicked wife back and whilst you’re at it take in the rabid ratbag Omid Scobie along with the man who paid £12 million to a woman he’d supposedly never met, Prince Andrew. You can have his feckless wife, Fergie, as a ‘Brucie bonus’ given it’s Christmas. Thank you ever so much, thank you kindly.”

Editor’s Note – Unlike as is the case in many publications, this article was NOT sponsored or supported by a third-party. Follow Matthew Steeples on Twitter at @M_Steeples.

Pictured Top – Jeremy Clarkson brews beer and fools about on farms; he enjoys life and doesn’t take things too seriously. Omid Scobie, meanwhile, is simply an eternal misery and an arselicker of a mendacious meddler loathed by millions.

Prince Harry and his wife have brought more shame on the royal family in 2022 than even the mouthy moron Prince Andrew. In a year when we lost Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, that this pair decided to air their dirty linen on Netflix and Spotify is proof that they are utterly reprehensible and fit only to be sent to Siberia.

After Jeremy Clarkson quite justifiably had a pop at the Duchess of Sussex, it was only to be expected that Omid Scobie would stick his rotten oar in.

Reliably, when met with criticism of his whining, pathetic specimen Scobie ended another tweet about Clarkson’s article with a curt: “Bye.”

It must be made clear that the ‘Finding Freedom’ author has another a book to peddle and his publishers must be giving him a bit of a hard time. Likely having had sent up a rocket up his never-sorry-arse, Scobie will likely now desperately spin all sorts of additional nonsensical yarns in the coming months.

A job flogging French fries in McDonald’s might actually prove more appropriate for him by 2nd August 2023.

Elsewhere on Twitter, further mockery of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex understandably followed in the wake of their disgraceful Netflix diatribe.

December 18, 2022
A Mucky Marriage – Will Prince Andrew Remarry Fergie? Did They Ever Repay The Paedo Jeffrey Epstein?

As “rumours” circulate that ‘Randy Andy’ and ‘Feckless Fergie’ might remarry again do the rounds, we again ask: “Did they ever repay loans taken from the paedophile Jeffrey Epstein?”

Yesterday, repeating a story that occasionally does the rounds, Entertainment Daily’s Julia Hunt asked: “Are Prince Andrew and Fergie to remarry in the wake of [his] sex scandal?”

Claiming the couple “have been plagued by rumours they could remarry recently,” former Bang Showbiz and Press Association freelance writer Hunt quoted a September 2021 feature by Vanity Fair’s royal ‘expert’ Katie Nicholl as her primary evidence. In it, Nicholl – best known for crashing Kate Moss’s 30^th birthday party at Claridge’s and discovering guests on the hokey-cokey – shared:

“Sarah and Andrew have been closer than ever in the past year. They still love and care for each other a great deal and have been living together during the pandemic.”

“It has rekindled something and I can see a second wedding happening if it [the Virginia Roberts Giuffre lawsuit] all goes Andrew’s way.”

Whilst Hunt’s update is clearly nothing but idle gossip produced without the citing of any new sources, last week the MailOnline’s Jack Wright revealed that the non-sweaty, Pizza Express loving mate of the alleged fraudster Bernie Ecclestone that is the Duke of York “barely leaves home.” He has been left wondering how his reputation has been left in tatters by his friendship with paedophile Jeffrey Epstein” and is said to be enduring a “period of intense self-reflection.”

Going further of a “virtual recluse” who has been left wondering “how everything went so wrong,” Wright turned to a previous article from The Telegraph and quoted yet another unnamed source, a “friend,” who stated:

“He has a much better understanding of the challenges he faces than at any other point in his life. He has a better sense of perspective – partly because he’s had these three years to reflect – to do the work, and to focus on his immediate family. The Duke of York of today is much more thoughtful and more mindful than he has ever been.”

“He acknowledges privately that Newsnight was by no means his finest hour.”

“The feeling that he has been treated abysmally is held by his nearest and dearest, but the duke’s attitude is more along the lines of: It is what it is.”

Clearly, though these ‘sources’ could be as made up as the spoof ‘Sir Michael Take CBE’ Twitter account that so successfully conned the MailOnline’s non-fact checking Elizabeth Haigh this morning (see below), things that seem unlikely do often occur in the royal family.

However, whilst the mainstream media may be asking if wedding bells will be again ringing for ‘Randy Andy’ and ‘Feckless Fergie,’ today we return to a question we will keep on asking of the money motivated duo and that is: “Did you ever repay the loans you took from the croaked paedophile Jeffrey Epstein?”

The friendship between Prince Andrew and Jeffrey Epstein dated back to the 1990s. In that time, both him and his ex-wife enjoyed hospitality and financial benefits from the since croaked paedophile without consideration of where the Ponzi scheming crook was actually getting his wonga from.

The Duke of York and Sarah, Duchess of York did not think to question where the money they happily grabbed came from and they did not question what the mucky madam Ghislaine Maxwell was doing with the young girls she so eagerly sex trafficked for Epstein either. How terribly convenient.

On Thursday 20th August 1992, the ‘Daily Mirror’ shared what they called “the pictures they didn’t want you to see.” In them, a topless Duchess of York was shown having her toes sucked in the South of France by a Texan millionaire named John Bryan. Of the incident, the ‘Mirror’ later reported: “Royal writer Richard Kay claimed in the ‘Daily Mail’ that he received a message via pager from Princess Diana the night before the photos hit the newspaper stands. Diana’s message was simple: ‘The redhead’s in trouble.’” If she were now to remarry the Duke of York, would it be accepted or would there be even more trouble?

This morning on Twitter, editor of ‘The Steeple Times’ Matthew Steeples shared a tweet about another example of ‘fake news’ shared by the ‘MailOnline’s’ Elizabeth Haigh. Accompanying a quoted tweet, Steeples observed: “The @MailOnline has been caught out by a spoof Twitter account. Sir Michael TAKE certainly TOOK some pillock on the paper. Retraction? Apology? I doubt it. #fakenews #dailymail #mailonline #youvebeenhad.” It is likely that ‘Entertainment Daily’s’ Julia Hunt has been similarly caught out with her story about the Duke of York and Sarah, Duchess of York considering remarriage, but who knows with ‘Needy’ and ‘Greedy’ … Stranger things could and have already happened.

The Weird Words of “Greedy” and “Needy” Sarah, Duchess of York

Of sex, her and goats: “One of the worst headlines said 82% [of the population] would rather sleep with a goat than Fergie. It’s never left me.”

Of the royal family: “They tried to put the little redhead in a cage.”

Of her life: “I have been in the gutter.”

Of food, family and dining: “As long as it is hot, wet and goes down the right way, it’s fine with me.”

“With every smell, I smell food. With every sight, I see food. I can almost hear food. I want to spade the whole lot through my mouth at Mach 2. Basta!”

“We all sit round the table and eat together. Andrew and I believe in total parent unity. We’re best friends.”

Of wanting to be a television star: “I would quite like to go on Dancing With The Stars. I would like somebody to teach me to tango. I do know the show and my children would be so proud of me.”

Of when she decided she wanted to bag a royal: “I met [Prince Andrew] when I was 12, and I said: ‘I’m going to marry him.’”

Of marriage, divorce and work: “I left my marriage knowing I’d have to work. I have.”

“I didn’t want a divorce, but had to because of circumstance.”

“I wish we’d never got divorced. He and I both wish we’d never divorced, but we did. I wish I could go back and be the bride again, but I can’t.”

Of her many, many mistakes: “I felt that I ostracised myself by my behaviour, by the past, by living with all the regrets of my mistakes, that I sort of wore a hair shirt and beat myself up most of the day thinking and regretting why did I make such a mistake. Why have I made so many mistakes?”

“You look at the devil in the face, which you do. Then you forgive, and you say: ‘OK, I’ve made almost a mistake that will never be forgotten,’ and forgive.”

“I was so out of control with desperation… I was looking for quick fixes in the places I wouldn’t normally look… I’ve been a huge, over-trusting, idiotic, stupid woman that went to look for the perfect situation, and that’s all I can say really.”

October 31, 2022
With Friends Like These… Prince Andrew Reacts To Ghislaine Maxwell Interviews

As prized pillock Prince Andrew reacts to mucky madam Ghislaine Maxwell’s interviews, we suggest that he’s a case of “with friends like these, who needs enemies”

Non-sweating, Pizza Express loving prized pillock Prince Andrew isn’t very good at choosing mates. He’s got “I’d take a bullet for Putin” coffin dodger Bernie Ecclestone – a deranged dwarf-like dweeb currently on trial for fraud – and aside from a fair few despots, he happily used to hang around with the croaked paedophile Jeffrey Epstein – even after his 2008 conviction.

Now, after another of his previously close mates, the convicted sex trafficking nonce and daughter of a pension pot plunderer Ghislaine Maxwell, gave a pair of “jaw-dropping” interviews to a PR peddler for Hillary Clinton named Daphne Barak, unnamed “close friends” of the royal have declared: “[He] needs Ghislaine’s support like a hole in the head.”

Whilst Maxwell claimed to “care for… dear friend [the Duke of York],” the chirpy, chatty “friend” of the late Queen’s second son responded describing the criminal’s remarks as “[having] not been very helpful.” Clearly, said individual is someone who likes understatements when it comes to observing public relations disaster areas.

“With friends like these, who needs enemies” comes to mind in the wake of Maxwell’s interviews with Barak for The Sun on Sunday and The Mail on Sunday. Here is a woman who has used her latest PR peddler to send out a message and it is a message that is clear.

The deviant daughter of a man most definitely a spy wants to tell the world something and that something is this: Ponzi schemer Jeffrey Epstein’s former lover is alerting the royal and the likes of Bill Clinton and Donald Trump that she expects them to help her out of her hell hole. It is a hell hole where she actually deserves to rot for the rest of her genuinely rotten existence.

Pictured top – The Duke of York and his live-in ex-wife Sarah, Duchess of York snapped in a Range Rover yesterday looking, as the ‘MailOnline’ was quick to point out, “ashen faced” and “incredibly serious.”

With friends like these… The guffawing goon that is the Duke of York was happy to take the “benefits” of his friendship with someone who bunged him cash and girls, Jeffrey Epstein, when it suited him. He was happy to take the “benefits” of his friendship with Ghislaine Maxwell, someone he allegedly even had a relationship with, when it suited him. He must now face the music and possibly also prepare to be dragged before the authorities if he ever dares to darken the doors of the United States of America ever again. Shame on him.

With friends like these… In February 2020, ‘The Steeple Times’ reported on croaked paedophile Jeffrey Epstein’s chum (and his wife Sarah, Duchess of York’s financial sponsor) Prince Andrew having Bernie Ecclestone over to Royal Lodge, Windsor to celebrate his birthday. Whether this man “with qualities that would make Leona Helmsley look generous” brought Sloppy Giuseppes from Pizza Express (Woking branch) for the bash remains still unknown.

With friends like these… Another chum of ‘Air Miles Andy’ is the billionaire despot leader of Azerbaijan President Ilham Aliyev. This authoritarian dictator is known for a regime that presides over elections that are not free and fair, where political power is concentrated in the hands of his family, where corruption is rampant and human rights violations are beyond severe. The Aliyev’s have over £400 million of property in the United Kingdom alone and the Duke of York has most definitely been beyond helpful to them.

With friends like these… Sarah, Duchess of York, equally, has a lot to fear from Ghislaine Maxwell. She happily took wonga from Ponzi schemer Jeffrey Epstein in loans and gifts and has never declared whether or not she ever repaid such prior to the paedophile’s death in 2019. Shame on her.

October 17, 2022
Mimimum Maxwell – Ghislaine Maxwell Laughably Wants 4 Years

As Ghislaine Maxwell faces 30 years in prison, her lawyers have ludicrously countered suggesting she should serve just a minimum 4 years; her few “remaining friends” and family laughably blub about the mucky madam being a “fundamentally good and decent person” who “still has much to contribute to the world if she is given a meaningful opportunity to do so”

“Remaining friends (most having cut ties due to fear of association and the lure of ‘cancel culture’) attest to Ghislaine [Maxwell]’s character; each offers a first-person narrative of some aspect of her life in sharp contrast to her characterisation as a villain, rich heiress, and vapid socialite” is a telling paragraph in Bobbi C. Sternhein, Christian R. Everdell and Jeffrey S. Pagliuca’s latest submission to the United States District Court Southern District of New York about their convicted sex offender client.

In a 77-page document accompanied by another of 29 pages, the word “victim” is very tellingly only referenced 4 times and not one of those mentions expresses any regret on behalf of the mucky madam Maxwell about what she has been deservedly convicted of doing to young women. They go as far to claim: “Probation essentially makes the sweeping assertion that a harsh sentence for Ms. Maxwell is necessary to deter rich people from exploiting poor people,” but ludicrously seek to blame “main offender” Jeffrey Epstein alone for this instead.

“Nor should she be sentenced as if she were Harvey Weinstein” is another laughable point made by the attorneys – Maxwell and the disgraced film mogul ironically partied together at the birthday party for Prince Andrew’s daughter on 15^th July 2006 – in an attempt to bring down the “correct sentencing range” to a minimum of 51 months or 4.25 years “not the 292-365 month [30.5 years] range calculated by the U.S. Probation Office.”

A “whirlwind of emotional turmoil caused by the relentless demands of her father” and an absent mother who ignored her are also cited as factors in Jeffrey Epstein’s co-collaborator’s downfall and whilst he isn’t actually named, her estranged husband Scott Borgerson is referenced. Of him, the attorneys remark:

“In 2013, Ms. Maxwell began a new relationship with the man she would later marry. She was with her husband for over seven years and became a devoted stepmother to her husband’s two youngsters, who were ages three and four and a half at the start of the relationship. Sadly, the marriage could not survive the negative impact of this case nor a husband’s association with his dishonoured wife.”

Lauded as “warm hearted, generous, kind, funny, thoughtful and loving” by friends and relatives, here is a portrayal of someone quite at contrast with what a court found of her in December. This wicked wench might think she can pull the wool over the courts with this barrage of bilge, but we simply conclude: “Now, go and pull the other one; it is time for this wholeheartedly evil conniving ratbag to rot and to deservedly rot in hell.”

Ghislaine Maxwell will be sentenced on 28^th June in New York. She deserves far more than the minimum asked for; in fact, she deserves to live out of the rest of her days in the clink to prevent her assisting in the abuse of a single further person.

The attorneys of the mucky madam seek to pin blame on the former socialite’s late parents Robert and Betty as an explanation for her antics in their 77-page submission. Of Ghislaine Maxwell’s mother, they remark: “At age three, she stood in front of her mother and said simply, ‘Mummy, I exist.’ On doctor’s orders exactly a year after Michael’s accident, her mother went on a long tour of India and Australia, leaving infant Ghislaine and her siblings not already in boarding school at home in the care of a nanny.” Of her as deviant as her father, they add: “Mr. Maxwell employed corporal punishment on his children. Ghislaine vividly recalls a time when, at age 13, she tacked a poster of a pony on the newly painted wall of her bedroom. Rather than mar the paint with tape, she carefully hammered a thin tack to mount the poster. This outraged her father, who took the hammer and banged on Ghislaine’s dominant hand, leaving it severely bruised and painful for weeks to come.”

Of what came after the death of her father “under suspicious and unresolved circumstances and under a cloud of business impropriety,” the lawyers add, ‘The Bouncing Czech’s’ clear favourite child was “left to fend for herself.” They remark: “It was around this time that Ms. Maxwell met Jeffrey Epstein for the first time. As Ms. Maxwell plans to appeal her conviction, we will not comment on the events during this time period that were the subject of the trial” and thus avoid delving into what she and her evil co-collaborator did to the victims they sex trafficked and sexually abused. Effectively, the excuse is one monstrous man replaced another man.

Since exposed as criminal sex abusers and predators including Harvey Weinstein, Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell attended Princess Beatrice’s 1888 themed 18th birthday party at Windsor Castle on 15th July 2006. The event cost a reported £400,000 – whether the Duke of York and his live-in ex-wife Sarah, Duchess of York contributed financially or instead got their rich friends to cough-up is, however, unknown – and other guests numbered more innocent sorts including Sir David Frost, Pixie Geldoff, Ashton Kutcher, Demi Moore and Kelly Osbourne. Curiously the convicted daughter of the Mirror pension pot plunderer is now seeking to distance herself from the former film mogul she was happy to be pictured with and does not want to be compared to someone convicted of what her lawyers term “forcible rape.”

“Her work was a far cry from the ‘flippity-jibit socialite’ label that the media has decided to cast on her every time they reference her” claim sisters Christine Malina Maxwell and Isabel Maxwell in a letter that is included in the 77-page document. Such a comment fails in that here was a woman who spent her life hobnobbing with the likes of Calvin Klein and Aby Rosen (pictured) and others including Bernie Ecclestone, Kevin Spacey, Prince Andrew and Naomi Campbell.

For many years a “secret husband,” Scott Borgerson has given up on his wicked wife and taken up with a yoga enthusiast with “an ass that could crack open a walnut” named Kris McGinn Straub. The house he bought with Maxwell in June 2016 in Manchester-by-the-Sea, Massachusetts was placed for sale in February 2022 for £5.368 million ($7.295 million, €6.443 million or درهم26.791 million). Whether it has sold is unknown.

In other news yesterday, the ‘Miami Herald’ referenced that “ Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein “operated, using offshore companies to build, disguise and conceal their wealth” whilst other publications claimed that the mucky madam would be “naming names” – an allegation examined in the ‘Globe’ on 18th April 2022. At the time, they claimed “the disgraced British socialite is spilling her guts… in return for a get out of jail free card.”

June 16, 2022
Farting Fergie Gets Wind

As Sarah, Duchess of York talks about “standing strong… when the winds get violent,” we again remind this toesucking twerp to answer the question: “Did she ever repay the croaked paedophile Jeffery Epstein?”

Sarah, Duchess of York needs to get herself some better advisers. At one-time represented by the PR peddler James Henderson – the former head honcho of Bell Pottinger and a man dragged through the quagmire of scandal after getting involved with some especially questionable South African clients – it is unknown who currently manages media matters for the live-in ex-wife of Prince Andrew, but whoever it is frankly deserves sacking.

Whilst The Steeple Times has repeatedly called upon the dimwitted duchess to explain if she ever repaid a financial loan and “other assistance” taken from the since croaked paedophile Jeffrey Epstein, this week, the mother of two daughters by a non-sweating man who paid a sum of circa £12 million to a woman he claimed prior to have never met has yet again stuck her cloven hooves in the proverbial.

In comments at the launch of the paperback version of her Mills & Boon novel Her Heart For A Compass, this washed-up wastrel prone to talking about farting on her YouTube channel also windily whimpered:

“The York family are a united front and we stand very strong and very tall. When the winds get violent, we keep standing.”

Going further and attempting to garner sympathy for the situations she herself has consistently created, the clearly delusional dimwit later added:

“I’ve always felt judged, which is why I support the LGBTQ+ community. I know what it’s like to be segregated. I’m 62 now and it still hurts, even now, when someone has a pop at me.”

Whilst most media turned their attention to other comments made at the book launch about the late Diana, Princess of Wales, again today it seems sensible to remind the lover of toesucking that the public would prefer her and the Duke of York to simply stick a sock in it.

With PR peddlers like these… Just as is the case with the mucky madam Maxwell’s choice of Brian Basham – who was involved with British Airways in the era of ‘Dirty Tricks’ against Sir Richard Branson’s Virgin Atlantic – as her spokesperson, the dimwit formerly known as Sarah Ferguson has never found a good PR advisor. James Henderson’s Bell Pottinger went into administration in September 2017 with a former colleague claiming: “It all went to his head. If he saw a picture of himself [in the paper], he was delighted.”

With friends like these… Happy to stand smirking with the now convicted mucky madam sex offender Ghislaine Maxwell in times prior, the Queen’s second son’s live-in ex-wife’s choice of friends serves only to illustrates only that she is either dim and a dunce or that she is happy to overlook deviancy in the hope of reeling in yet more wonga.

With toesuckers like these… On Thursday 20th August 1992, the ‘Daily Mirror’ shared what they called “the pictures they didn’t want you to see.” In them, a topless Duchess of York was shown having her toes sucked in the South of France by a Texan millionaire named John Bryan. Of the incident, the ‘Mirror’ later reported: “Royal writer Richard Kay claimed in the ‘Daily Mail’ that he received a message via pager from Princess Diana the night before the photos hit the newspaper stands. Diana’s message was simple: ‘The redhead’s in trouble.’”

With a temper like this and a willingness to take dubious money also… In 2018 and prior to all the drama she caused by taking dubious money from Epstein and Chinese and Turks, the mother of Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie had a temper tantrum on ’60 Minutes Australia’ when questioned about seeking out cash from what she clearly must have known to be illegitimate sources.

The Weird Words of “Greedy” and “Needy” Sarah, Duchess of York

Of sex, her and goats: “One of the worst headlines said 82% [of the population] would rather sleep with a goat than Fergie. It’s never left me.”

Of the royal family: “They tried to put the little redhead in a cage.”

Of her life: “I have been in the gutter.”

Of food, family and dining: “As long as it is hot, wet and goes down the right way, it’s fine with me.”

“With every smell, I smell food. With every sight, I see food. I can almost hear food. I want to spade the whole lot through my mouth at Mach 2. Basta!”

“We all sit round the table and eat together. Andrew and I believe in total parent unity. We’re best friends.”

Of wanting to be a television star: “I would quite like to go on Dancing With The Stars. I would like somebody to teach me to tango. I do know the show and my children would be so proud of me.”

Of when she decided she wanted to bag a royal: “I met [Prince Andrew] when I was 12, and I said: ‘I’m going to marry him.’”

Of marriage, divorce and work: “I left my marriage knowing I’d have to work. I have.”

“I didn’t want a divorce, but had to because of circumstance.”

“I wish we’d never got divorced. He and I both wish we’d never divorced, but we did. I wish I could go back and be the bride again, but I can’t.”

Of her many, many mistakes: “I felt that I ostracised myself by my behaviour, by the past, by living with all the regrets of my mistakes, that I sort of wore a hair shirt and beat myself up most of the day thinking and regretting why did I make such a mistake. Why have I made so many mistakes?”

“You look at the devil in the face, which you do. Then you forgive, and you say: ‘OK, I’ve made almost a mistake that will never be forgotten,’ and forgive.”

“I was so out of control with desperation… I was looking for quick fixes in the places I wouldn’t normally look… I’ve been a huge, over-trusting, idiotic, stupid woman that went to look for the perfect situation, and that’s all I can say really.”

May 18, 2022
Fergie Needs To Explain – Jeffrey Epstein Loan

Aside from showing audacity in wearing shoes featuring the words ‘Never Complain’ and ‘Never Explain’ after her ex-husband’s £12 million payout to a woman he claimed to have never met, isn’t it time that Sarah, Duchess of York confirms if she ever paid the paedophile Jeffrey Epstein back?

Yesterday, Richard Eden – the Daily Mail’s venerable diarist – decided to mention that Sarah, Duchess of York had been spotted at Oswald’s in Mayfair wearing a pair of slippers featuring the words ‘Never Complain’ and ‘Never Explain.’

Repeating that story yet again this morning, the apologist for amongst others the paedophile Rolf Harris, in her frankly tedious weekly column, the harpy and harridan that is Amanda Platell added that she thinks that “[the woman formerly known as Sarah Ferguson] might want to explain why she took £20,000 for advising a Northern Ireland caravan tycoon embroiled in allegations of money laundering on top of a £225,000 separate payment. Caravans? Has she ever set foot in one?”

Both columnists might note that Hello! first referenced Prince Andrew’s live-in ex-wife’s ludicrous footwear as “different, but cool” in May 2019 and that The Steeple Times featured Fergie’s other ‘feet-related incidents’ in July 2021 – amongst them that infamous “toe-sucking incident” and the time that she blamed the late Diana, Princess of Wales for catching verrucas.

Equally, aside from having a pop at the definite dimwit over the money she took from Alphabet Capital and the £232,000 she owes to “Chinese investors,” it is time that the mainstream media dealt with a far more serious matter. Sarah, Duchess of York has never confirmed whether she repaid the loan and “further assistance” she took from the since croaked paedophile Jeffrey Epstein and it is now time to remind her that without an answer, she simply continues to bring shame on the already shamed House of York.

One is left wondering if Sarah, Duchess of York (pictured here with her deservedly since convicted sex offender mucky madam mate Ghislaine Maxwell) spent any of the money she got from the paedophile, sex trafficker of children Jeffrey Epstein on shoes.

That this wastrel woman thinks it appropriate to speak about the late Diana, Princess of Wales giving her verrucas and wearing footwear that basically is an “up yours” to the victims of her ex-husband’s ‘bestie’ Jeffrey Epstein is beyond outrageous, but what is worse is that she has no shame in taking money from the dastardly, the deviant and the deranged.

On Thursday 20th August 1992, the ‘Daily Mirror’ shared what they called “the pictures they didn’t want you to see.” In them, a topless Duchess of York was shown having her toes sucked in the South of France by a Texan millionaire named John Bryan. Of the incident, the ‘Mirror’ later reported: “Royal writer Richard Kay claimed in the ‘Daily Mail’ that he received a message via pager from Princess Diana the night before the photos hit the newspaper stands. Diana’s message was simple: ‘The redhead’s in trouble.’”

Sarah, Duchess of York’s support for the Duchess of Sussex is another example of her backing the wrong horse. Referencing footwear, the feckless live-in ex of ‘Randy Andy’ once remarked: “It must be hard for Meghan and can I relate to her. I believe she is modern and fabulous. She was famous before. She is great. Why can’t Meghan be great? Why can’t she be celebrated? I have been in Meghan’s shoes, and I still am. There’s always a twist of negativity and it just gets so sad and tiring… I abhor bullying and I feel desperately sorry for the pain they must be going through.

In 2018, the mother of Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie had a temper tantrum on ’60 Minutes Australia’ when questioned about seeking out cash from what she clearly must have known to be illegitimate sources.

The Weird Words of “Greedy” and “Needy” Sarah, Duchess of York

Of sex, her and goats: “One of the worst headlines said 82% [of the population] would rather sleep with a goat than Fergie. It’s never left me.”

Of the royal family: “They tried to put the little redhead in a cage.”

Of her life: “I have been in the gutter.”

Of food, family and dining: “As long as it is hot, wet and goes down the right way, it’s fine with me.”

“With every smell, I smell food. With every sight, I see food. I can almost hear food. I want to spade the whole lot through my mouth at Mach 2. Basta!”

“We all sit round the table and eat together. Andrew and I believe in total parent unity. We’re best friends.”

Of wanting to be a television star: “I would quite like to go on Dancing With The Stars. I would like somebody to teach me to tango. I do know the show and my children would be so proud of me.”

Of when she decided she wanted to bag a royal: “I met [Prince Andrew] when I was 12, and I said: ‘I’m going to marry him.’”

Of marriage, divorce and work: “I left my marriage knowing I’d have to work. I have.”

“I didn’t want a divorce, but had to because of circumstance.”

“I wish we’d never got divorced. He and I both wish we’d never divorced, but we did. I wish I could go back and be the bride again, but I can’t.”

Of her many, many mistakes: “I felt that I ostracised myself by my behaviour, by the past, by living with all the regrets of my mistakes, that I sort of wore a hair shirt and beat myself up most of the day thinking and regretting why did I make such a mistake. Why have I made so many mistakes?”

“You look at the devil in the face, which you do. Then you forgive, and you say: ‘OK, I’ve made almost a mistake that will never be forgotten,’ and forgive.”

“I was so out of control with desperation… I was looking for quick fixes in the places I wouldn’t normally look… I’ve been a huge, over-trusting, idiotic, stupid woman that went to look for the perfect situation, and that’s all I can say really.”

April 30, 2022
Feckless Farting Fergie’s Flatulent Failings

That taker of loans from paedophiles and reader of books about farting Sarah, Duchess of York thinks she can get away with keeping £225,000 in tainted cash shows her yet again as nothing but a total berk

It cannot be described as anything but “predictable” that Sarah, Duchess of York yet again finds herself in hot water given how childlike and naïve she genuinely is, but what she doesn’t yet realise is that like Aesop’s boy who cried wolf, her future antics will not be accepted.

With news that the woman once nicknamed ‘The Duchess of Pork’ and ‘The Duchess of Dork’ is refusing to repay £225,000 she took from Alphabet Capital – a firm connected to an alleged fraudster named Selman Turk and described in the High Court as nothing but a “front for apparent money laundering” – the Queen’s favourite son’s live-in ex-wife yet again brings shame on the House of York and the wider royal family.

Paid “apparently” if you’d believe the claptrap peddled out by her representatives to be a “brand ambassador for a US green energy firm” in spite of her having utterly no qualification or relation to anything to do with the energy sector, the toe sucking lover formerly known as Sarah Ferguson is said to “have considered Mr Turk, a banker, ‘perfectly bona fida.’”

Considering the wider implications at this juncture it must also be once again considered that Prince Andrew’s soppy sidekick also has yet to repay sums provided to her by Chinese investors and worse still has never confirmed if she repaid sums she took from the since croaked paedophile Jeffrey Epstein.

Sarah, Duchess of York – a woman who likes to take to YouTube to read books about farting – has yet again truly shown herself to be a reprehensible specimen and a stagnating stain on the royal family. It is time for her to shut up and shut down and it is time for her to speed off to Siberia. Whilst she’s at it, please, ‘Fergie,’ take that rotter who paid £12 million to a woman he’d supposedly never met with you.

Pictured top – It must be asked: “Who in their right mind would trust this man?” of Selman Turk (left) and a clearly smashed-off-her-skull Sarah, Duchess of York (right).

In May 2012, the drunken duchess was “forced to apologise to diners” at Osterio Dell’Arcanio restaurant in Chelsea after having “had an argument with someone who tried to take a photograph” of her in an episode of “drunken antics” whilst she was with a “rowdy group of people.” The restaurant’s sommelier, Maurizio Titone, remarked at the time: “They were a bit loud, but she went to another table to apologise for the noise.”

In another episode in 2010, the redheaded rotter tried to sell access to to the royal family for £500,000. At the time an undercover reporter filmed her stating: “Five hundred thousand pounds, when you can, to me… open doors.”

In 2018, the mother of Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie had a temper tantrum on ’60 Minutes Australia’ when questioned about seeking out cash from what she clearly must have known to be illegitimate sources.

If she had an ounce of dignity, Sarah, Duchess of York would realise that reading allowed books about farting is anything but dignified.

The Queen’s second son’s live-in ex-wife has clearly lately rather let the hooch go to her head. In excusing the ‘bestie’ of paedophiles like Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, all she does is to bring total and utter shame on her relatives. Meanwhile, taking loans from crooks simply shows her to be a greedy grubber.

The Weird Words of “Greedy” and “Needy” Sarah, Duchess of York

Of sex, her and goats: “One of the worst headlines said 82% [of the population] would rather sleep with a goat than Fergie. It’s never left me.”

Of the royal family: “They tried to put the little redhead in a cage.”

Of her life: “I have been in the gutter.”

Of food, family and dining: “As long as it is hot, wet and goes down the right way, it’s fine with me.”

“With every smell, I smell food. With every sight, I see food. I can almost hear food. I want to spade the whole lot through my mouth at Mach 2. Basta!”

“We all sit round the table and eat together. Andrew and I believe in total parent unity. We’re best friends.”

Of wanting to be a television star: “I would quite like to go on Dancing With The Stars. I would like somebody to teach me to tango. I do know the show and my children would be so proud of me.”

Of when she decided she wanted to bag a royal: “I met [Prince Andrew] when I was 12, and I said: ‘I’m going to marry him.’”

Of marriage, divorce and work: “I left my marriage knowing I’d have to work. I have.”

“I didn’t want a divorce, but had to because of circumstance.”

“I wish we’d never got divorced. He and I both wish we’d never divorced, but we did. I wish I could go back and be the bride again, but I can’t.”

Of her many, many mistakes: “I felt that I ostracised myself by my behaviour, by the past, by living with all the regrets of my mistakes, that I sort of wore a hair shirt and beat myself up most of the day thinking and regretting why did I make such a mistake. Why have I made so many mistakes?”

“You look at the devil in the face, which you do. Then you forgive, and you say: ‘OK, I’ve made almost a mistake that will never be forgotten,’ and forgive.”

“I was so out of control with desperation… I was looking for quick fixes in the places I wouldn’t normally look… I’ve been a huge, over-trusting, idiotic, stupid woman that went to look for the perfect situation, and that’s all I can say really.”

April 7, 2022