Tag: Law

The Deadly Waters of Divorce – ‘The Steeple Times’ Guide to Finding The Best Divorce Lawyers in the UK and the USA
Legal eagle David Lennox unravels the complexities of finding the best divorce lawyers in the UK and the USA. Discover the top law firms for wives, husbands, optimal settlements, and protective strategies

Divorce is a challenging, emotional process that becomes even more complex when legalities are added into the mix. Navigating the convoluted maze of family law requires the assistance of an experienced divorce lawyer who can guide you through each step, protecting your interests along the way.

In this article, we’ll guide you through the task of finding the best divorce lawyer for your specific circumstances, be it in the United Kingdom or the United States. We’ll highlight top-tier law firms known for their excellence in diverse aspects of divorce cases: from advocating for wives or husbands, to those known for securing optimal settlements, to firms adept at handling intricate financial matters for high-net-worth individuals.

Top UK Divorce Lawyers
1. Stewarts Law LLP
Specialising in high-net-worth divorce cases, Stewarts Law is perfect for clients who have substantial assets to protect. With their vast experience, they excel in handling complex financial matters seamlessly.
1. Vardags
Known for representing wives seeking fair settlements, Vardags has an impressive track record. Their dedicated team ensures each case is handled with utmost care and understanding.
1. Withers
Withers is renowned for its prowess in handling cross-border divorce cases involving international assets. For couples with global connections, they’re an excellent choice.

Top USA Divorce Lawyers
1. McKinley Irvin
Based in the Pacific Northwest, McKinley Irvin is noted for their advocacy for husbands. Their lawyers are well-versed in the unique challenges men face in divorce cases.
1. Wasser, Cooperman & Mandles
A top choice for securing optimal settlements, this Los Angeles-based firm offers expert representation. Their vast experience in negotiation and litigation can make a considerable difference in your settlement.
1. Berkman Bottger Newman & Schein LLP
With a focus on high-net-worth divorce cases, this New York firm provides strategic advice and representation for protecting substantial assets.

Twice divorced himself Raymond Tooth and fellow divorce law titan Fiona Shackleton in June 2013; the pair had lunched at the rather ritzy Scott’s restaurant in Mount Street, Mayfair at a time when the divorce of Nigella Lawson from Charles Saatchi was front page news. Tooth is best known for having represented Sadie Frost in her divorce from Jude Law, Cheryl Barrymore in her divorce from Michael Barrymore and Irina Abramovich in her divorce from Roman Abramovich. Baroness Shackleton’s highest profile clients have numbered The Prince of Wales in his divorce from Princess Diana, Petra Ecclestone in her divorce from James Stunt, Claire Henry in her divorce from Thierry Henry and Alyce Eichelberger in her divorce from John Cleese.

Baroness Shackleton is best known for an incident during the final settlement hearing in the divorce of Heather McCartney Mills from Sir Paul McCartney where a maniac-like Mills poured a jug of water over her head; Fiona Shackleton left court that day sporting a very different hairdo to when she arrived.

Making the Right Choice

The best divorce lawyer for you depends on your unique circumstances. Consider these top ten law firms in the UK and USA:

Best for Wives:
- Vardags (UK): Their empathetic, meticulous approach empowers wives to secure fair outcomes.
- Laura Wasser at Wasser, Cooperman & Mandles LLP (USA): Known as the ‘Disso Queen’, Wasser has represented numerous high-profile wives.
Best for Optimal Settlements:
- Mishcon de Reya LLP (UK): Known for their strategic negotiation skills.
- Wasser, Cooperman & Mandles LLP (USA): Their track record speaks volumes about their ability to negotiate favourable settlements.
Best for Husbands:
- Slater and Gordon (UK): Their robust advocacy protects husbands’ rights.
- McKinley Irvin (USA): They’re dedicated to representing and understanding the unique challenges husbands face.
Best for High-Net-Worth Individuals:
- Stewarts Law LLP (UK): Expertise in handling intricate financial matters.
- Berkman Bottger Newman & Rodd, LLP (USA): Top choice for high-asset divorce cases.
Best for Cross-Border Cases:
- Withers (UK): For those globe-trotting couples whose asset pool spans continents, Withers is your ticket to a well-handled international divorce.
- The Law Offices of Korol & Velen (USA): Their nuanced understanding of international divorce law makes them the perfect fit for cross-border cases.
Now, let’s add some spicy masala to our otherwise sober law curry. We present to you, the illustrious ‘Divorce Wall of Fame’:

The Wall of Fame

For those interested in the glitz and glamour side of divorce law (if there is such a thing), here’s our extended ‘Wall of Fame’ showcasing high-profile celebrity divorces and the impressive settlements they’ve garnered, showing the might and prowess of their legal representatives.
- Stewarts Law LLP (UK): As one of the UK’s most renowned law firms, they’ve handled a variety of high-profile cases. One notable client is multi-millionaire hedge fund manager Chris Hohn, whose divorce from wife Jamie Cooper resulted in a £337 million settlement, one of the largest in British history.
- Sears Tooth Solicitors (UK): “Don’t get even, get Tooth” is often said of Raymond Tooth – whose “tenacious approach in handling cases has resulted in his being nicknamed ‘The Rottweiler’ and ‘Jaws.’ The Daily Mail has noted him as “the nation’s leading celebrity divorce lawyer” and once suggested: “He knows a thing or two about the vicissitudes of matrimony.”
- Vardags (UK): Known for handling complex, high-net-worth divorces, Vardags represented the former beauty queen, Pauline Chai, in her divorce from Laura Ashley tycoon Khoo Kay Peng. This high-profile case resulted in a whopping £64 million settlement after a bitter and protracted battle.
- Withers Worldwide (UK): Withers guided Guy Ritchie through his complex, cross-border divorce from Madonna. The final settlement was rumoured to be between £50 million and £60 million, one of the most sizable in the entertainment industry.
- Payne Hicks Beach (UK): This prestigious firm represented the then Prince Charles in his divorce from Diana, Princess of Wales. The settlement, though kept private, was widely reported to include a lump sum of £17 million and an allowance for a private office.
- McKinley Irvin Family Law (USA): One of the top-rated family law firms in the US, they have represented high-net-worth individuals across industries, although the specific details are confidential.
- Wasser, Cooperman & Mandles, P.C. (USA): The star-studded clientele of Laura Wasser includes Angelina Jolie, Maria Shriver and Kim Kardashian. Wasser was instrumental in securing Jolie’s custody of her and Brad Pitt’s six children, while the monetary settlement remains undisclosed.
- Diggs & Sadler (USA): This Houston-based firm represented Elin Nordegren in her divorce from Tiger Woods. The Swedish model and the golf pro’s divorce resulted in a whopping $100 million settlement for Nordegren.
- Berkman Bottger Newman & Schein, LLP (USA): While keeping their client list under wraps, they have represented a significant number of high-earning individuals and have dealt with many multimillion-dollar settlements.
- Blank Rome LLP (USA): Notably represented Steven Spielberg during his divorce from Amy Irving. The settlement was reportedly a cool $100 million, thanks to a prenuptial agreement that was scribbled on a napkin and later dismissed by the judge.
- Pryor Cashman LLP (USA): The firm represented Rupert Murdoch in his divorce from Anna Murdoch. At the time, the settlement – estimated at a staggering $1.7 billion – was the most expensive divorce ever.
- Moses & Singer LLP (USA): Arlene Dubin of this New York firm, based in the Chrysler Building, represented Michael Douglas during his divorce in 2000. Diandra Luker Douglas ultimately received an estimated $45 million.
- Zuckerman Spaeder LLP (USA): The firm was hired by Juanita Jordan to represent her in her divorce from basketball legend Michael Jordan. The settlement reached an estimated $168 million, making it one of the largest public record divorce settlements in history.
The world of high-stakes celebrity divorce can be complex and contentious, but with the right legal counsel, even the most prominent stars can navigate these troubled waters. Of course, it’s not about the size of the settlement but achieving the best possible outcome for each unique situation. It just so happens that in Hollywood, that’s not always possible.

Divorce Disasters: When Things Went South…

While some celebrities walk away from divorce settlements with their pockets filled, others aren’t so fortunate. Here’s a look at some high-profile, high net worth divorces where the financial fallout was, let’s say, less than expected. Remember, this isn’t about blaming lawyers, but highlighting the complexities of these situations.
- Heather Mills and Paul McCartney: After a highly publicised and acrimonious divorce battle with her ex-Beatle husband, Heather Mills ended up with a £24.3 million settlement – a large sum by any standard, but a fraction of McCartney’s estimated £800 million net worth. Fiona Shackleton, McCartney’s lawyer, successfully argued down from Mills’ initial request of £125 million.
- Kevin Federline and Britney Spears: Federline reportedly received only $1 million from pop star Britney Spears in their 2007 divorce settlement, which seems relatively small given Spears’ huge success. Laura Wasser represented Spears in this case and was likely instrumental in the prenuptial agreement that protected most of her assets.
- Ted Danson and Casey Coates: In the 90s, Ted Danson, famous for his role on Cheers, left his wife of 15 years, Casey Coates, for his co-star Whoopi Goldberg. This decision reportedly cost Danson $30 million – nearly half of his net worth at the time – because of a generous prenuptial agreement. In this case, the marriage dissolution didn’t go ‘wrong’ legally, but Danson’s personal decisions led to an enormous payout.
- Michael Jordan and Juanita Vanoy: Michael Jordan’s first divorce from Juanita Vanoy ended in a $168 million settlement in favour of Vanoy. The basketball legend didn’t have a prenuptial agreement in place. While the settlement was fair, it could have been very different if they had had one in place.
- Madonna and Guy Ritchie: Guy Ritchie walked away with a staggering sum estimated at between £50 million and £60 million from his divorce from pop icon Madonna, the biggest payout from a female celebrity to her lesser-earning spouse at the time. While Ritchie was not disadvantaged, it illustrates the importance of financial planning, even when one spouse earns significantly more than the other.
These cases underline the importance of both parties having competent legal representation and the potential perils of entering into a marriage without a clear understanding of the financial implications. It’s not about ‘winning’ or ‘losing’ a divorce, but ensuring a fair and equitable outcome for all involved.

Madonna supposedly decided her marriage to Guy Ritchie “wasn’t what I thought it was going to be” in 2008 after allegedly asking the question: “How much am I willing to sacrifice?” The couple’s ‘quickie divorce’ came about after Baroness Shackleton for Madonna “worked tirelessly to reach agreement” with Ritchie’s lawyer, Helen Ward.

The 2016 ‘Brangelina Split’ went down in history as one of Hollywood’s “most messy” divorces and one that resulted in the most costly set of legal bills ever. With so many children between them, this separation was always going to be complex, but with assets including a French vineyard and estate, Chateau Miraval, divvying up proved beyond difficult for Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt. In August 2022, Lizzie Edmonds of the ‘Evening Standard’ concluded: “Let’s hope both parties get what they want in the end.”

Choosing a Good Lawyer: The Art of Disclosure and the Importance of Honesty

Selecting a good lawyer is crucial, whether you’re navigating a contentious divorce or facing any legal issue. A competent attorney can mean the difference between a favourable outcome and an unfavourable one. So, how do you choose a good lawyer, and how should you present your case to them?

Choosing a Good Lawyer

Start with a focused search. Legal expertise is broad and varied, so you need an attorney who specialises in the area of law relevant to your case. In divorce proceedings, for instance, seek out a family law specialist who has a solid track record in divorce settlements.

Once you’ve shortlisted potential lawyers, research their reputation and experience. Look at online reviews and ask for references if possible. However, be aware that some reviews might be biased, so take them with a grain of salt. Additionally, make sure they have experience in the jurisdiction where your case will be handled. Different jurisdictions can have different rules and procedures.

The initial consultation is your opportunity to gauge if you’re comfortable with the attorney and their approach. Do they explain things in a way that you understand? Do they seem to have your best interests at heart? Remember, this person will be your advocate, so a positive rapport is crucial.

Cost is also a factor. Legal fees can vary greatly depending on the complexity of your case and the attorney’s reputation and experience. Be sure to ask about their billing practices upfront to avoid any unpleasant surprises.

Engaging with Your Lawyer

Now that you’ve chosen your lawyer, how do you engage with them effectively?

Full and frank disclosure is vital. Share every detail related to your case, even if you think it’s unimportant or detrimental. Lawyers need a comprehensive understanding of the situation to provide effective representation. It’s like giving a doctor all your symptoms; without complete information, they can’t diagnose or treat you effectively.

Your lawyer is bound by attorney-client privilege, meaning they’re legally obliged to keep your information confidential. So, don’t hold back. A detail you consider insignificant could be the key to your case.

The Importance of Honesty

While honesty is generally a good policy, in legal matters, it’s an absolute necessity. Lying or omitting facts can be disastrous. In court proceedings, if you’re caught in a lie, it can shatter your credibility, leading the court to view all your statements with suspicion. Even outside of court, dishonesty can lead to mistrust and conflict with your attorney, damaging a critical relationship in your case.

Honesty is particularly crucial in divorce proceedings, where financial and child custody issues can be contentious. For example, trying to hide assets can lead to severe repercussions, including financial sanctions and a potentially unfavorable ruling.

Engage in open and honest communication with your attorney. They’re there to help you navigate the legal minefield, but they can only do that effectively if they know the whole truth. Trust them to handle your information sensitively and strategically.

Remember, your lawyer is your ally in the legal process. Choosing the right one and engaging with them honestly and openly is paramount to ensuring the best possible outcome in your case.

Navigating the Attorney-Client Relationship: What to Say And What Not to Say…

Interacting with your lawyer is not as straightforward as one might think. While full disclosure is often advocated, there are indeed instances where revealing certain things to your lawyer might put them in a predicament. In this regard, divorce proceedings can be especially complicated due to their personal and emotive nature.

When Silence is Golden…

Firstly, while discussing your case, it’s essential not to fabricate facts or suggest to your lawyer that you plan to. Any indication of dishonesty, including manipulating evidence or lying in court, places your lawyer in an ethical dilemma and could lead them to withdraw from your case. The same applies to concealing assets or income during a divorce, which is not only unethical but also illegal.

In addition, discussing hypothetical illegal actions can be a tricky situation. For instance, saying: “What if I were to hide some of my assets?” implies a consideration of illegal activity. It’s always better to ask about the consequences of certain actions rather than suggesting you might engage in them.

Also, avoid criticising or talking ill of your ex-spouse unnecessarily. While it’s important to provide relevant information about their behaviour, especially if it directly affects custody or alimony decisions, engaging in character assassination can make you appear vindictive and could potentially harm your case.

What Should be Said…

On the other hand, it’s important to be transparent about your financial situation, including all assets and liabilities. Be honest about any marital misconduct like adultery, as these can impact the case. If there are any existing restraining orders or accusations of abuse, your lawyer needs to know. Discuss your expectations and goals openly – whether related to custody, division of property, or financial support.

Remember, your lawyer is on your side, but they can only do their job effectively with a clear understanding of your circumstances. That said, they are not your therapist. Avoid discussing issues that aren’t legally relevant or using meetings as a venue for venting personal frustrations.

Remember: When in doubt, it’s always better to ask your lawyer whether something is relevant or necessary to disclose. They can guide you based on their professional knowledge and experience, and the specific legal and ethical rules that apply.

The Intricacies of Attorney-Client Confidentiality

Understanding attorney-client confidentiality can also be crucial when deciding what to disclose. This privilege protects most communications between clients and their lawyers, enabling you to be candid about the facts of your case without fear that your lawyer will disclose your statements. However, there are important exceptions to this rule.

In the US, lawyers cannot assist clients in committing a crime or fraud. If a client tells a lawyer about a plan to engage in illegal activity, the lawyer may be required to disclose this information. Also, if a client admits to past illegal conduct, the attorney generally cannot disclose it unless the client consents, or the attorney believes it is necessary to prevent substantial bodily harm or death.

In the UK, the legal principle of confidentiality is similar, although there are circumstances where the lawyer may be obliged to breach confidentiality, like when the lawyer suspects the client is using their services to commit a crime or fraud. Legal professionals in the UK also have obligations under money laundering regulations, which could force them to report suspicious activities.

These nuances underscore the importance of honesty and openness while communicating with your lawyer. If you feel the need to withhold information, it’s better to discuss this instinct with your lawyer directly. They can provide guidance about what they can keep confidential and what they may need to disclose.

Think of the Children: The Human Side of Divorce

While it’s natural to focus on winning your case, it’s equally important to consider the human element, especially when children are involved. The psychological impact of a contentious divorce on young minds cannot be overstated. In the heat of the legal battle, normal, right-minded people can become obsessively focused on achieving their desired outcomes, sometimes losing sight of the collateral damage being caused.

Numerous studies have shown that it is not the divorce itself, but rather the conflict associated with it, that can cause profound emotional harm to children. They may feel caught in the middle, forced to choose sides, or even blame themselves for the breakdown of the family.

In many cases, winning at all costs can end up being a pyrrhic victory. The toll taken on your children’s emotional well-being and your ongoing relationship with them can far outweigh any material gains. It’s crucial to keep perspective during this challenging time, prioritizing the long-term emotional health and happiness of all involved over any short-term legal victories.

Remember, the best divorce lawyer isn’t always the one who fights tooth and nail for every last penny or asset. Sometimes, the most effective lawyer is the one who helps navigate the rough emotional waters of divorce while protecting both their client’s interests and the well-being of the children involved. After all, the true measure of success in any divorce should be the ability to start the next chapter of your life on a positive and healthy note.

If you decide to use any of the lawyers mentioned in our article, please mention that you found out about them through The Steeple Times. Hopefully, they might do the decent thing and, at the least, send a politely worded thank you note and please remember this; divorce is never going to be polite, but it can be done in a civil fashion.

David G. Lennox is a retired solicitor, an occasional restaurant critic for ‘The Steeple Times’ and an avid consumer of margaritas. He has been known to pen an odd word or two about the ‘Sport of Kings’ and the ‘Beautiful Game’ also. Follow him on Twitter at @davidglennox.

Editor’s Note – Unlike as is the case in many publications, this article was NOT sponsored or supported by a third-party.

Disclaimer – Attorney-client privilege and confidentiality can be complex and varies depending on jurisdiction and circumstances. This article provides general information and does not constitute legal advice. Always consult with a legal professional to understand your rights and obligations fully.

This article is meant to provide general guidance on communicating with your lawyer. It does not constitute legal advice, nor does it establish an attorney-client relationship. Every legal situation is unique, and advice must always be tailored to the specific circumstances. Therefore, for your situation, you should consult a lawyer directly.
June 1, 2023
Yankee Wally v Omid Scobie 2022

As ‘MeGain’s’ bestie Omid Scobie claims Sadie Quinlan (AKA ‘Yankee Wally’) is “on a watch list” with the “good folk at South Wales Police and Scotland Yard” and the “Fixated Threat Assessment Centre” also, the popular YouTuber reports him to the police herself

Whilst the Duchess of Sussex was quite rightly forced to apologise to the Appeal Court in London for making a misleading statement – which the BBC described as her (rather conveniently) having “forgotten events” – in December, it seems her number one PR peddler, the wretch that is Omid Scobie has turned his attention to the popular ‘Yankee Wally’ YouTuber Sadie Quinlan and isn’t allowing her to forget her own past.

Yesterday, in an 11:09-minute YouTube upload that has been watched over 17,700 times and ‘liked’ by 3,500 already, Quinlan shared a tweet from Scobie that described her as a “racist” and “deranged criminal.” He went further and claimed: “Don’t even waste a second on what that deranged, racist criminal thinks. Leave it to the good folk at South Wales Police and Scotland Yard, whose Fixated Threat Assessment Centre have [Sadie Quinlan] on a watch list.”

Understandably upset by the harsh words of this so-called “royal editor” for Harpers Bazaar and self-proclaimed New York Times “bestselling author,” Quinlan – who made clear she had no prior knowledge of how Scobie could know of such a listing – decided to respond by herself calling the Metropolitan Police.

She remarked: “The last thing you need Omid Scobie is somebody calling you ‘deranged’” and added: “I am not a criminal. I shall take this absolutely all the way I can. When that lovely police officer rings me back next week from the Fixated Threat department, I am going to take it to the highest level.”

Of two others she believes have connections to such matters, Quinlan added: “Let’s have the bloody lot. I’m watching you and I’m going to make charges against you if I can… I’m coming for you… I am absolutely tamping [Welsh adjective meaning ‘extremely angry’] mad.”

The lesson to mouse-not-a-man Omid Scobie and his associates here should be laid clear: If you give it out, expect it back – especially when you take on the force to be reckoned with that is ‘Yankee Wally.’

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TvOmZpLg0wY

The tweet by Omid Scobie, posted on Twitter on 19th February 2022 at 7:11pm, in which he described Sadie Quinlan as a “deranged, racist criminal.”

In August 2020, the ‘Daily Mail’ shared that plastic-not-fantastic Omid previously worked at gossip magazine ‘Heat’ and partied with the ‘glamour model’ Jodie Marsh. They mentioned how somebody had “airbrushed” Meghan Markle’s “entry on the online encyclopedia Wikipedia… to include more flattering details days before her romance with Prince Harry became public” and illustrated the ‘Finding Freedom’ author’s “drastic transformation” in two very different photographs. Mr Scobie is someone who most definitely would like his past forgotten, but curiously he doesn’t want to allow Sadie Quinlan to have hers forgotten.

Illustrating himself to be anything but a real journalist, “influencer” Scobie told the ‘Women in Leadership Publication’: “A casual follower be forgiven for thinking that royal news is just fizzy commentary on the pomp and soap opera of The Firm” in their spring 2021 edition. He self-importantly added: “Reaching millions on Twitter has also enabled my own views and advocacy to travel further” and concluded: “I want to do everything I can to ensure that individuals from every background can get a seat at the table.” Here is someone far from a journalist; here, in fact, is someone who should just be called out as the Duchess of Sussex’s PR peddler.

An analysis of Omid Scobie’s Twitter feed clearly shows that a large proportion of his followers are a bit like himself: FAKE.

The Duchess of Sussex – pictured giving the clearly far more dignified by far Duchess of Cambridge a right old glare – likes to stir the pot. One of her chief pot stirrers is most definitely Omid Scobie – a poison pen pest described by Nikolay Kalinin in ‘The Steeple Times’ in July 2021 as “a washed-up, childish clot” and someone with “no legitimacy in the media industry.”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=7&v=d78tO3dLrD4&feature=emb_logo

When he’s not bragging about wearing Balenciaga, Gucci, Louis Vuitton and Christian Dior or sharing photos of his dog, Yoshi, on his Instagram account, the ‘Finding Freedom’ author constantly bangs on about how he believes the royal family to have racist elements. His speculation is rarely supported by anything other than unnamed sources that give his suggestions little to no credibility.

Sadie Quinlan (AKA ‘Yankee Wally’ responds to Omid Scobie calling her a “deranged, racist criminal”

“All my content is found on the public domain with just my own views and opinions and I do follow the fair use and the fair dealing guidelines”

“I think this tripped me over the edge… They can get their just deserts. Scobie wrote this in reply to whatever her name is, Amanda @MattaOfFact.”

“I like it Amanda I thought you did a fabulous spiff of me and if gets you a bit of extra money after your ten grand from your gopher Lee and whatever money you manage to scrape from your Patreon. You’ve got every begging bowl on the Internet opening and waiting for the money, haven’t you? So, make a bit of money off me, my pleasure, fill your boots.”

“But anyway, Scobie replied to this and this is what he said: ‘Oh dear. Don’t even waste a second on what that deranged, racist criminal thinks. Leave it to the good folk at South Wales Police and Scotland Yard, whose Fixated Threat Assessment Centre have her on a watch list.’”

“Right, OK, so I thought to myself it’s got to be done. Now, you know what I say and I’ll say it again and I’m an absolute manic about it. Do not waste police time. Don’t do it. If you’ve got a little problem, your neighbour is giving you gyp, banging on a wall, wait until the next day and ring 101. Don’t dial 999. Don’t ring the police unless it’s urgent.”

“Having said that, who am I to judge what is urgent and what’s not, but you’ll find that yours truly will take an awful lot of s**t before I ring the police. Because, well, well this is the way I was taught.”

“I even apologised to the police officer today saying that somebody could be needing them a lot more than me. He said, erm, in his London accent: ‘Well, don’t worry about it Sadie,” erh.”

“Anyway, let me tell you what happened. So I see this and I’m thinking: ‘One step too far, one step too far.’ So, then I go looking online for whatever the Fixated Person’s thing is and I found all this information.”

“So, I’m thinking, I don’t wanna [sic] ring the police. I do not want to ring the police. So, yes, I can give them that [sharing a screenshot of what information is required], I can give that, I can give that, I’ve got a passport, I’ve got a licence, so I will do that, I do that.”

“Right ‘o. OK and then I got the number for Scotland Yard so I thought maybe I’ll ring them and ask them because I couldn’t find a number for the Fixated Threat people and I didn’t, at the time, see where I could fill in a form.”

“So, I’m on the phone waiting now. This is Scotland Yard. I took a screenshot the minute that they answered at 11:43am. You can see the time at the top there [sharing another screenshot], 16:36 so it is not even an hour ago now and then I found a form that you could fill in on that webpage that I just showed you and so I wrote down everything that I could.”

“Meanwhile, 25 minutes on the phone to Scotland Yard. ‘I’ve been told I’m on your list. It’s all over Twitter and also it has been claimed by Omid Scobie, a journalist, that I am on your ‘watch list.’ I am horrified.” I couldn’t put it all in one, so I scrolled.”

“’Please can you confirm this as a matter of urgency, if this is true? And if it is, why? This has upset me beyond words and I am also extremely cross at the insulting nature of Mr Omid Scobie’s claim. I look forward to your reply ASAP.” Then I said: “Regards.”

“Now, while I was in the middle of filling all this form in, though it didn’t take me long, Scotland Yard answered the phone to me, so then I am on the phone to Scotland Yard and, erm, they answered at around about 4:30pm and I was on the phone to them until about quarter to five.”

“And I spoke to an absolutely, and I’m not just saying this, he was so kind to me because I was almost crying. I was beside myself, I have to be honest because, I mean, erm, I’m not trying to get sympathy here, but I can’t bloody walk. How am I going to stalk anybody? And if I can’t walk, do you know how hard it is for me to post a letter? I’ve got to beg the postman, if I catch him when he delivers a letter. I can’t get out to the postbox, so as far as malicious letters and stuff, everything I do is online.”

“So, they answered the phone and I spoke to him and I explained and he said: ‘Well, you’ve hit lucky today, Sadie.’ I said: “Oh, why’s that?’ He said: ‘Well, because I’m covering here on the main switchboard, but my main job is in the Fixated Threat department.’ Ha ha ha… On my life, on my life, that’s his job. Ha ha ha…”

“So, he asks for my name, my date of birth and all the other things, my address and off he went and he came back and he said, and by now I am crying and I said: ‘Look, I’m worried sick about this.’ I said: ‘I’m not a stalker’ and he said: ‘We’re going to ring you back about this, Sadie,’ he said: ‘And who was the person that made this complaint?’”

“I said: ‘I believe it is Omid Scobie, but it could be somebody else. It’s on Twitter.’ He said: ‘Here’s a reference number.’ Here we are. He gave me his number, the policeman’s number and a reference number and there’s the ‘umpty’ [sic] form and that’s where you can get it if you want to fill it in.”

“So, erm, I’ve haven’t rung South Wales Police yet because I think Scotland Yard is all I need because I’ve looked at this Fixated Threat thing and it’s all based in London Metropolitan Police. So, I thought no, I’m not saying that the Welsh are organ grinders. Not the monkey, the organ grinder. Yeah, Metropolitan Police will be the organ grinder and we are the monkeys, I know that.”

“So, I’m waiting now to hear from them, probably next week and, erm, that’s that. So, I’m not letting this go because, what, what I don’t like, I’ll tell you what I don’t like: I’m not a racist, I can make jokes about people with black skin if I want to. Like, Ricky Gervais. If you don’t like it, don’t bloody listen to me.”

“I am not a criminal anymore. I am an ex-criminal. I’ve paid my price to society twenty bloody years ago.”

“Scobie, you, don’t throw stones unless your own house is clean and what’s the other one, er, ‘deranged.’ Now that, now that hurts because when you’ve been to a psychiatrist for the best part of ten years after you’ve been made homeless and God knows what and you are antidepressants and you’re doing OK thank you very much. And I can hold, I can string a sentence together, I can think coherently and there’s been times, and I don’t mind telling you, I wasn’t able to do that.”

“So, when somebody calls me ‘deranged,’ it kind of, it kind of trips a switch and it’s an angry switch because when you’ve worked hard on your mental health, when you’ve worked bloody hard to get your mental health back to normal, the last thing you need Omid Scobie is somebody calling you ‘deranged.’ That is very, very harmful and to call me a ‘racist’ is wrong. I’ve told you: My son-in-law is the same colour as you.”

“I am not a criminal. I shall take this absolutely all the way I can. When that lovely police officer rings me back next week from the Fixated Threat department, I am going to take it to the highest level.”

“And there’s two other people I’m after too. I’ll tell you who they are now. You [sharing a screenshot of the Twitter handle of Unstoppable-Chi, @dumielauxepices], Lorenzo, I know, you. I know it’s you that busted me in the beginning. It’s you that got into the ‘me-we’ group and it’s you that exposed my criminal past for all to see.”

“You hide in the shadows, you little creep. You hide in the shadows and you pop up with some really cruel things. You have been stalking me because you know more about me than what I know myself. I’m watching you, I’ve been watching you for two years, but now been as we’re going to bring it all out in the open, let’s have the bloody lot. I’m watching you and I’m going to make charges against you if I can.”

“And you [sharing a screenshot of the Twitter handle of Gin Perdide, @GPerdide], you little bastard. Who are you? You were watching me. Everytime you talk about me, you put the word ‘criminal,’ ‘convict,’ ‘madam.’ You’ve got a, I don’t even know who you are, but I’ll tell you what, I will get Twitter to find out who you are and anybody else who keeps calling me a ‘criminal’ or a ‘racist’ or ‘deranged.’”

“Those three things are like red rags to a bull and my birth sign is Taurus the bull and my birthday is the same day as the Queen. We are built with the same steel backbone. I’m thirty years younger than her. God bless her and I will come for all of you, but meanwhile, meanwhile, you can just sit there and s**t yourself quietly and I’ll be coming for you.”

“Thanks for listening everybody. I’ll be back later. Honestly, this will wash over me. It’s just right now, I am absolutely tamping [Welsh adjective meaning ‘extremely angry’] mad.”

In her uniquely chirpy ‘Yankee Wally’ style, in the description box, Quinlan added

“Sorry, I forgot to say Cheerio!”

“Now you’ve seen me at my worst…. Or, have you?”

“It’s very hard for me to keep an even keel when someone’s upset me so badly.”

“People that have mental health problems, never ever get them totally ‘fixed.’ They are usually suppressed with antidepressants and antipsychotics. I’m on huge doses of both.”

“But, when Scobie has the audacity to call me ‘deranged’ … It triggered me in a way only other sufferers can understand. “

“Heck, I have not worked with therapy counselling psychiatrists and drugs for 20 years to be diagnosed as DERANGED!”

“#omidscobie said a very very bad thing. and he will learn not to verbally abuse those who are not as strong as him

“And everybody else whose insulted me. You will all be made accountable.”

“I LOVE MY ONLINE FRIENDS DEARLY and I will defend you too.”

“CHEERIO!”

Responses to Omid Scobie’s vexatious tweet about Sadie Quinlan

February 21, 2022
Clear ‘Orf Cressida

Matthew Steeples suggests that Met Police chief Dame Cressida Dick is not fit for purpose and must finally now resign

Dame Cressida Dick DBE, QPM shouldn’t be in charge of a bus ticket, let alone the nation’s capital’s police force. Here is a woman who spends her time moaning about the BBC’s Line of Duty drama series – which she claimed “absolutely outraged” her – rather than actually solving crime; frankly, she’s proved as useful as a chocolate teapot and now, today, I again call for her to just go.

In September last year, when we revealed that an escaped prisoner couldn’t get himself arrested in spite of handing himself in to the Met Police on seven, yes SEVEN occasions, we remarked “it’s long been known that Dame Cressida couldn’t police a pissup in a brewery,” but in the time since things have gotten worse at the force headed by this totally inept and clearly inane waste of space.

Aside from having been in charge of the operation in which a totally innocent man, Jean Charles de Menezes, was shot dead due to gross incompetence on the part of her officers in 2005 and given what The Sun termed “feeble” responses to “lawless protests by Extinction Rebellion and others,” the Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis’ response to the conviction of one of her own officers has been utterly showing of the fact that she truly isn’t fit for purpose.

Armed officer Wayne Couzens – who was indicatively nicknamed by colleagues at The Met ‘The Rapist’ yet nothing was done about him – has now pleaded guilty to the murder of Sarah Everard in March. How did his boss respond? With what The Sun quite rightly called out as “vapid assurances [that] lessons [have] been learned across the board.” Going further they added: “The people to blame for this predator being on the streets should be held to account,” whilst we add: SHAME ON HER.

Condemned also by the crusading blog From The Hornets Nest also last week as “presiding over our crime-riven city” and protected by a “pernicious, masonic like influence,” any respect there ever was for Dame Cressida Dick is well and truly gone. She now needs to finally do the only thing left to her: RESIGN and clear ‘orf.

Dick has also been criticised over the botched the Metropolitan Police’s handling over investigations into child sex abuse, their fruitless £30 million investigation into the murder of private investigator Daniel Morgan (pictured) and her force’s handling over the use of stop and search of those of black and other ethnic minority backgrounds.

In 2018, this ludicrous woman blamed rising crime in London on social media rather than a lack of proper policing. She told Fiona Hamilton and Rachel Sylvester of ‘The Times’: “There’s definitely something about the impact of social media in terms of people being able to go from slightly angry with each other to ‘fight’ very quickly… It [social media] makes it harder for people to cool down. I’m sure it does rev people up.”

The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis’ decision to refuse to stand down over police handling of a vigil for the late marketing executive Sarah Everard – murdered in cold blood by one of her very own officers – provided proof of her arrogance. “No, I’m not considering my position,” she curtly commented.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=elSZtYkRQyY
After the shooting of the entirely innocent Jean Charles de Menezes in 2005 by her officers, Dick did anything but take responsibility. She remarked of it: “The events of that day stay with one; I think about it quite often. It was a traumatic period. It was an awful time for so many people, obviously and most of all Jean Charles’s family, the people who were there when it happened, the firearms officers, the surveillance officers.” In response, de Menezes family called for her to be brought to book and quite justifiably later opposed her subsequent promotion.

Summing up how out-of-touch with reality she truly is, Dame Cressida stated of her force: “We’re not institutionally corrupt.” Her comments came after the failed £30 million investigation into the murder of Daniel Morgan was quite rightly condemned due to those involved most definitely being aided and abetted by corrupt Metropolitan Police officers. It is now time for her to consider her position and RESIGN.

July 14, 2021
The Devil’s Advocate is Back

‘The Devil’s Advocate’ Giovanni Di Stefano’s life is set to be made into a film following his forthcoming release from jail (and deportation from Britain)

In March 2014, the incarcerated conman Giovanni Di Stefano tweeted The Steeple Times to claim he had cheated “no one” before adding: “Who did I kill?” In spite of the fact that this po-faced prattler and all-round prick had been convicted and jailed for 14 years for “tricking people into thinking he was a bona fide legal professional” when he was anything but in 2013, he’s shortly about to get out of jail and after deportation from Britain will be participating in a film about his life and lies.

For plainly extremely intelligent but completely lacking in any kind of moral compass Di Stefano’s victims – whom include Tricia Walsh-Smith, a lady best known for making a video that went viral after it was published on YouTube during her especially acrimonious divorce from the then president of The Shubert Organization – this film will pile yet more misery on their already substantial losses. The film, which is to be made by six Academy Award nominated director Jim Sheridan, is based on a biography written by this “one of life’s great swindler’s” plainly anything but impartial son, Michael Di Stefano.

Currently titled The Devil’s Advocate – How to Win Fiends and Influence Despots in a plain nod to Dale Carnegie and Toby Young also, Sheridan commented of it: “It’s very easy to see this as a dramatic feature, but I think for now – the documentary form will suit the story better. This is an intriguing story and truly unique. The lead character is simply unbelievable, and we are delighted to have the exclusive co-operation of Giovanni, his family, his long-term assistant and his personal lawyer to tell the story.”

Going further, executive producer Jezz Vernon of Port Royal Media added: “The subject material is jaw dropping, we’re excited to bring Jim’s vision of the story to the screen. It’s a huge coup that Giovanni and his family have chosen to work exclusively with us.”

Summing rotten ratbag “defender of the indefensibles” Di Stefano – whose supposed clients in spite of him having no legal qualifications whatsoever up allegedly numbered ‘Moors Murderer’ Ian Brady, paedo pop singer Gary Glitter, slum lord Nicholas van Hoogstraten, deranged dictator Saddam Hussein, warped war criminal Slobodan Milošević and pensioner slayer Dr Harold Shipman – up in March 2013 before sending him down, Judge Alistair McCreath, the Recorder of Westminster, stated:

“Your victims in this case were all desperate people and people who, because of their desperation, were vulnerable… It is also about something different and great – it is about the real distress you caused to so many people… You had no regard for them nor for their anguish… Your only concern was to line your own pockets.”

Any film that suggests anything to the contrary will be nothing but claptrap.

On 11th May, Michael Di Stefano tweeted complaing his father’s prison sentence to be “arbitrary and unlawful.”

In spite of being incarcerated, in April, Giovanni Di Stefano was able to tweet his views on MI5 whilst his son claimed the “UK breaks the rules to hold him.”

Also in April, Di Stefano tweeted his sorrow about the death of the Ponzi schemer Bernie Madoff and claimed he’d written to President Trump to ask him to put him “on his pardon list.”

In February, this prisoner was able to post nonsense on his blog about predictions also.

In January, Di Stefano tweeted about his sadness on the passing of the murderer Phil Spector.

May 27, 2021
Deviant Durst Deservedly Denied

Real estate royal, bigamist and body dismemberer Robert Durst is deservedly denied an indefinite halt to his trial as his lawyer attacks the reputation of one of this suspected serial killer’s likely victims

Defended only by Donald Trump – whom once remarked of him on Twitter: “Personally, I think Douglas Durst’s brother got screwed by Douglas – no wonder he’s angry” – cross dressing real estate scion Robert Durst, a man accused of murdering his one-time best friend Susan Berman in 2000 unsurprisingly didn’t manage to get his latest trial halted indefinitely this week.

Clearly deviant beyond belief and a man whom drank Jack Daniels and smoked pot before hacking apart the body of his then neighbour, Morris Black, and chucking his body in Galveston Bay in 2001, this definite deviant also remains a suspect in the 1982 disappearance of his wife, Kathie. Here, indeed, is someone with a plainly warped beyond weird moral compass and here is a 78-year-old with no concept of right and wrong.

Speaking of him in court in Los Angeles yesterday, Durst’s own attorney, Dick DeGuerin remarked on the “awful, awful dismemberment” as a “sickly… Durst blinked occasionally but [showed] no outward sign of emotion,” according to ABC News’ Brian Melley. DeGuerin then continued: “He doesn’t make good decisions… [but he] did not kill Susan Berman and he doesn’t know who did… [He] had no motive to gain by the death of Susan Berman.”

Turning to the slayed victim, DeGuerin condescendingly continued: “She was a fabulist. She made up stories. She told lies day in and day out.”

DeGuerin and others thus far have neglected to mention another of his client’s decidedly dodgy traits: In March 2020, this evil looking man’s “secret second wife,” Debrah Lee Charatan, was damned as a “bigamist” by a lawyer for the sister of Kathie Durst. Speaking to the New York Post, Robert Abrams remarked: “Plain and simple, she violated the law, she is a bigamist.”

Going further of Charatan having had another husband “until his death in 2019,” Abrams added: “There is no question that while married to Mr Durst, Mrs Charatan purported to contract a marriage with Steven Holm.”

After being forced to cut ties to his family empire in 2006, Robert Durst was bunged £46 million ($65 million, €53 million or درهم239 million) as part of a likely since unfulfilled hope that he’d disappear and shut his almighty gob. He handed £14 million ($20 million, €16 million or درهم73 million) of that to Debrah Lee Charatan. She continues to plug her trade online at BCBprop.com.

Murder victim journalist Susan Berman (1945 – 2000) pictured with her one-time ‘bestie’ turned alleged killer. Mobster’s daughter Berman was found dead on Christmas Eve 2000 at her home in Benedict Canyon, California. Her body was found in an “execution style” setting, but it was not until March 2015 that Durst was arrested and charged in New Orleans with her first degree murder.

Debrah Lee Charatan pictured with her late “husband” Steven Holm.

A ‘lounging’ Debrah Lee Charatan (left) and pictured with another of her husbands, Robert Durst (right).

Robert Durst pictured with his “disappeared” first wife, Kathie. This week Westchester County District Attorney Mimi Rocah announced her office is reopening the investigation into the 1982 disappearance. Of this, Rocah remarked: “At the time that this alleged homicide occurred… We did not have the same understanding of domestic violence, and how that kind of abuse could play into relationships and how it could frankly color law enforcement – and by that I mean police and prosecutors’ perspectives. So we will investigate this… It is challenging to do it after so long and we want to do it right. This has been around, and the family obviously wants and needs closure, I think, a whole community wants and needs closure.”

May 21, 2021
Hoping v Helping

Sue Homan quite deservedly “slams” decidely deviant disgrace Michael Barrymore for not helping secure justice for her murdered ex-husband Stuart Lubbock

Whilst late last month we reported that Michael Barrymore had been dragged in for further questioning about the 2001 rape and murder of Stuart Lubbock at his Roydon, Essex bungalow, his former agent, Mike Browne, heartlessly batted off questions by cretinously commenting: “The police seem convinced with the evidence they have found but I’ve no idea what it is. They seem sure but I can’t see how it can end in charges after so long.”

Responding to the wicked wall-of-silence from Barrymore and the other 7 still-living guests supposedly present that night – one of whom is presumably the 50-year-old recently arrested in connection with the appallingly sick slaying – yesterday, Stuart Lubbock’s ex-wife, Sue Homan, told The Sun:

“It would have really helped our campaign to have someone with [Michael Barrymore’s] fame supporting us.”

“Barrymore could have reached out to Stuart’s grieving family more to help them get justice.”

Previously, on the 5^th May, Homan shared another article from The Sun and tweeted:

“So, after reading this. I’m assuming @mrbarrymore will be getting in touch soon, so we can both work on getting #Justice4Stuart Yes? No? Thoughts below pls. Michael Barrymore hopes for justice over death of Stuart Lubbock in his swimming pool 20 years ago.”

Responding to the tweet, another campaigner for #Justice4Stuart, ‘Agent 007’ answered:

“He’s only ‘hoping’ I’m afraid Sue, I don’t think he’ll go as far as ‘helping.’ He’s spent 20 years trying to make this disappear… I dread to think who’s advising him… Oh, it’s his pound shop solicitor.”

Now, today, we join all calling on Michael Barrymore and the others present that fateful night to finally do the decent thing and join those helping work towards a second inquest. It is time these miraculously quiet individuals finally assisted Essex Police and it is time each and every one of them responds to the police plea advertised as follows:

“Nine people went to the party at Michael Barrymore’s house, but only one of them – Stuart – ended up being violently sexually assaulted and murdered. We know not everyone at the party was responsible for what happened, but someone was. We also know that not everyone at that party may know what happened, but someone does… 19 years – still no justice: Help us get answers for Stuart. Someone knows.”

Pictured top: Michael Barrymore (left) in a decidedly dodgy shirt and Stuart Lubbock and Sue Homan in happier times on their wedding day in July 1993.

Of their marriage, in 2001, Miss Homan told the ‘Daily Mail’ – “He always wanted to settle down and have children. Stuart was devastated when we broke up. We had grown apart and I had grown up. I realised that I was too young to settle down.”

“Stuart was a lovely, lovely man who would do anything for anyone. He worked hard and adored his children. I just cannot believe that he is dead, no one can.”

Hoping v Helping 2021 – A decidedly drunk Michael Barrymore pictured (left) with a decidedly drunk and since convicted racist bigot Marie-Claire, Baroness von Alvensleben and with another of his equally vile friends, the thankfully now croaked paedophile Sir Jimmy Savile (right).

Hoping v Helping 2021 – The scene of the rape and murder of Stuart Lubbock on 31st March 2001: Michael Barrymore’s then home, 4 Beaumont Park Drive, Roydon, Harlow, Essex, CM19 5HB.

Hoping v Helping 2021 – A now 50-year-old Jonathan Kenney. This one-time estate agent turned estate agent was a lover of Michael Barrymore at the time of the murder of Stuart Lubbock and claimed to be the first to have discovered the body. In March this year, ‘The Sun’ reported: “[Kenney now] works as a coach driver and is in a long-term relationship with someone else,” though other reports elsewhere cited him as being a driving instructor.

Hoping v Helping 2021 – As he faces certain death soon from terminal cancer, Stuart Lubbock’s crusading father Terry Lubbock deserves an answer to the question he has never stopped asking. That question: “Who killed Stuart Lubbock?”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-1wRAvqXOos&t=34s

May 10, 2021
Maxwell Delayed

Matthew Steeples suggests that Ghislaine Maxwell’s trial being delayed is not surprising given new charges against the mucky madam; it is now time Prince Andrew spoke to the FBI, he adds

After banging on about her ‘black eye’ and her lawyers having had shared an undated image of a woman who shouldn’t be posing for pictures given she’s incarcerated anyway, the disgraced socialite Ghislaine Maxwell has finally secured a ‘win’ after her trial was given “a short continuance until the fall of 2021 to allow the defence to prepare for the additional charges brought.”

The fact of the matter in this development, however, is that the new charges brought against Maxwell recently not only extend the timeframe in question from 1994 to 1997 to 1994 to 2004 – key to the period in which the mucky madam was especially involved with the likes of Prince Andrew – but also increased her number of “minor” accusers from 3 to 4 victims. Here, now, we have before us a wicked wastrel of a woman facing a likely far worse fate and, frankly, thus, a small extension to allow her to “prepare” can be considered reasonable.

In other legal correspondence yesterday, the Honorable Alison J. Nathan stated “the Court declines to take further action at this time” in response to Maxwell’s lawyers claiming that paperwork supposedly destined for their client had been interfered with by her jailors. Dismissing yet more distraction technique by the ‘Bouncing Czech’s’ deviant daughter, Nathan also added that the trial delay must be “no longer than necessary” and after ordering both sides to quickly work towards a new proposed trial date quite rightly added:

“No [further] additional delay is necessary or in the interests of justice… Importantly, any victims and the public more broadly have a strong interest in trial proceeding without undue delay.”

Pictured top: Ghislaine Maxwell looking smug. No doubt, today, she’s feeling such at having her trial delayed, but isn’t she just delaying the inevitable? Someone sane, would seek a plea deal, but this mendacious minx has the same attitude as her fraud father and will remain arrogant to the end.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T0HuM8Sg9u0&t=1790s
Maxwell Delayed – On Friday, I appeared on Shaun Attwood’s YouTube channel to discuss Ghislaine Maxwell’s ‘black eye’ and other recent developments in the case. Also featured was author, sex abuse survivor and advocate Kirby Sommers and a gentleman named Charlie Robinson.

Maxwell Delayed – Now, after a period of mourning for his late father, it is jolly well time that ‘Randy Andy’ faced the music and went to answer the questions of the FBI about his involvement with his ‘bestie’ Ghislaine Maxwell and the late paedophile Jeffrey Epstein. On Saturday, the ‘Daily Star’ reported that the “Queen [is] ‘trapped in Catch 22’ with Prince Andrew ahead of Ghislaine Maxwell trial” and reported royal commentator Daniela Elser claimed: “Her Majesty is in ‘dangerous territory’ regarding how [she] manages the fallout of the Duke of York’s ties to the disgraced late financier and his alleged accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell.” Elser added: “The public wants to see Andrew disciplined and forced to pay more of a price for his abysmal choices however having lost his royal job, patronages and reputation what else is there to take away? Short of Her Majesty forcing him to mow the acres and acres (literally) of palace lawn every week or pushing him out of a speeding Range Rover in front of the US Embassy and leaving him to the FBI, royal hands are tied.”

Maxwell Delayed – Ghislaine Maxwell used to pose naked at Jeffrey Epstein’s mucky mansion in Palm Beach; now after supposedly faking photos at burger joints, the alleged vegan is posing with black eyes. How times change for this daughter of the pension plunderer Robert Maxwell.

Maxwell Delayed – Last week, this not-seen-before image of Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein with Bill Clinton emerged. Given the multiple interactions between the former POTUS and the deviant duo, Clinton must, like Prince Andrew, be squeamish about what will be said about his ‘involvement’ at any forthcoming trial.

Maxwell Delayed – Responding to the delay to Maxwell’s trial, Kirby Sommers tweeted: “This ‘trial’ is going to go sideways.”

Maxwell Delayed – Going further, Sommers added: “[Her] legal strategy is to wear down the prosecution. Wear down the victims… And try to get out of jail. No way she’s releasing names. And no way does she want to stand trial.”

Maxwell Delayed – Referencing another element to the case, Sommers linked to a ‘Maza Inside’ article about a former friend of Maxwell who’ll be giving evidence against the alleged mucky madam. She quoted that ex-friend as saying: “[Maxwell] told me she could get into anybody’s pants and that girls are like candy.” Going further the unnamed “wealthy Californian woman” added: “This woman was worse than Jeffrey Epstein. She has no conscience. I wondered about a lot of things with her, sometimes.”

Maxwell Delayed – Elsewhere on Twitter, echoing the late Caroline Aherne’s words to Debbie McGee in character as ‘Mrs Merton’ Malcolm Finch told his 4,200 followers: “Peter Mandelson used to spend his time hanging around Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell’s Palm Beach mansion. I wonder what attracted Peter Mandelson to billionaire Jeffrey Epstein?” In May 2020, ‘The Steeple Times’ reported on the late Paul Daniels’ wife Ms McGee “boasting about her connections to ‘Randy Andy’” and in June that year we also explored the somewhat curious relationship between ‘Prince of Perv’ Epstein, ‘Prince of Darkness’ Mandelson and ‘Princess of Pugnacious’ Maxwell.

May 4, 2021
Website of the Week – Yankee Wally

Sadie Quinlan’s ‘Yankee Wally’ YouTube channel where she “plays by the rules” whilst exposing what she views to be the nefarious activities of the Duchess of Sussex is a must watch

Piers Morgan is undoubtedly her best known ‘hater’ and whilst the likes of the knicker-free-flasher who’ll do-anything-for-the-limelight Lizzie Cundy repeatedly bangs on about having been “ghosted” by her (for a dime), there’s a one-woman band who actually brilliantly tears down the wicked wastrel formerly known as Meghan Markle and that’s Sadie Quinlan and her ‘Yankee Wally’ YouTube channel.

Complete with a drawl from the Welsh Valleys or thereabouts, “strong Brexit, strong Trump supporter” Quinlan always begins with an announcement: “All my content is found on the public domain, it’s just my opinions and I play by the rules” (whatever they may be) and she well and truly tells it like it is. Here, indeed, is someone with a passion for taking down the Sussexes and of them she declares: “I thoroughly enjoy exposing the lies of Meghan Markle, and her husband is just as bad. I’m here till they lose titles and funding.”

Aside from uploading videos analysing what she views as the nefarious activities of the ‘Modern Day Mrs Simpson’ for her 34,500 subscribers, Quinlan it seems keeps herself busy elsewhere and announces on her blog DirtyGiftedWelsh: “The bigger picture matters. Think. Ahead. #meghanmarkle #charlatanduchess #MEGXIT #notmyduchessever.”

Curiously, in July 2005, the South Wales Echo reported on a Cardiff “brothel madam [named Sadie Quinlan pulling] a gun on a man during a row over a car parking space.” After the then 49-year-old was jailed for this incident of road rage, at sentencing her solicitor remarked: “She accepts that she overreacted.”

Whether this is the same Sadie Quinlan is unknown, but elsewhere the YouTuber of that name declares on the National Theatre Wales community website that, aside from her interest in rogue renegade royals, she is currently working on “projects” including “justice, the sex industry, tax is theft, government transparency, despises hypocrites, changing the bankruptcy laws in [the] UK.”

Yankee Wally is a must watch. Pour yourself a strong G&T and be prepared to be amused as you get ‘De-Markled.’ You won’t regret it.

Pictured top: The woman formerly known as Meghan Markle was once snapped playing with bananas whilst her drip of a husband looked on; Sadie Quinlan, meanwhile, is definitely a cheerleader for her to slip on one.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JEKricEm2SU

April 8, 2021
Monster of the Moment – Rebecca Sabben-Clare QC

Barrister Rebecca Sabben-Clare’s attempt to muzzle the media by citing the Cliff Richard case rather than muzzling her snarling dog shows her to be an utter disgrace

Those close to the seemingly supposedly “exceptionally bright” yet plainly actually just irresponsible barrister Rebecca Sabben-Clare QC ludicrously claimed Toby, her “snarling” terrier-cross, to be “sweet” and a “friendly pet” in the wake of it savagely causing the death of a “defenceless” seal nicknamed ‘Freddie Mercury.’

Just like giraffe slayer Merelize van der Merwe, who attempted to justify being gifted the “opportunity” to mercilessly slay an innocent giraffe by her husband for Valentine’s Day, wealthy and “fearless” Sabben-Clare opted to try to silence those outraged in the wake of the incident rather than taking responsibility for what the beast she owns had done.

A selfish self-preservationist rather than a seal conservationist, Sabben-Clare – who lives in a £6 million ‘mansion’ near the scene of her dastardly dog’s sick savagery – didn’t stick around for long to help at the scene of the mauling and later pompously declared: “I left for my own safety and that of my dog… There was nothing that I could do.”

Meanwhile, immediately concerned for her own reputation, Sabben-Clare “instructed lawyers Schillings to bully the media into not naming her.” Of this anything but selfless course of action, Guido Fawkes remarked: “She cited the Cliff Richard case to invoke a supposed right-to-privacy in an attempt to keep her name out of the story.”

Going further, Guido Fawkes continued:

“Rebecca Sabben-Clare set legal dogs Schillings on the press yesterday afternoon to try and cover-up her name, when that didn’t work after the Mail Online named her, Rebecca Sabben-Clare switched tactics and cooperated with a soft-soap PR puff piece telling the Standard:”

“I am heartbroken by this terrible accident. As an animal lover, I fully understand the dismay that has been expressed. I apologise unreservedly for what happened. In hindsight I wish, of course, that the dog had been on a lead but at the time that did not seem necessary.”

“Yet another example of the rich and powerful trying it on with lawyers to muzzle the press. Shame Rebecca Sabben-Clare QC didn’t muzzle her dog. Didn’t work and Schillings have lost again…”

Continuing further of this rotten ratbag, Roll On Friday yesterday reported that Sabben-Clare’s chambers, 7 King’s Bench Walk, had issued a statement about the totally avoidable yet utterly sick incident involving a dangerous dog that should now be put down. Their unnamed spokesman attempted to distance themselves and remarked:

“7 King’s Bench Walk is deeply saddened by the death of a seal by the side of the Thames following an incident involving a self-employed member of Chambers. This was a tragic accident which unfortunately resulted in the death of a lovely wild animal… Please be aware that Rebecca took her own advice in relation to this matter.”

One clear point arises out of this debacle that need never have happened: If Rebecca Sabben-Clare had kept her dog on a lead and controlled it in an area where there were supposedly notices about the seal’s presence, this incident would not have occurred. She should now face the consequences and her dog ought, at the very, be least taken away from her before it harms another animal or a child even.

#NameAndShame #RebeccaSabbenClare #Freddie #JusticeForFreddie

To join the 44,400 people who’ve already supported our Change.org petition seeking to get the giraffe slayer Merelize van der Merwe banned from Facebook, please click here.

Responding on Twitter, editor of ‘The Steeple Times’ Matthew Steeples remarked: “Rebecca Sabben-Clare QC, whose dog savaged an innocent seal because she let it run wild, should hand herself in at her nearest police station and she should hand her bloody dog in also. Shame on her for thinking she can PR her way out of this. The woman is a disgrace.”

Furthering her PR campaign, one of Rebecca Sabben-Clare’s neighbours later arrogantly blubbed: “He has no history of this and is super sweet with our dogs. I don’t know the breed. But she (Rebecca) is a nice person. It could happen to anyone.” The injuries to the now tragically deceased seal, Freddie Mercury, prove quite to the contrary.

March 27, 2021
40,000 turn on Mental Monster Merelize van der Merwe

As our Change.org petition seeking to ban giraffe slayer Merelize van der Merwe tops 40,000 signatures, the psycho publicity addict shared a CBS documentary of another mental monster killing a giraffe

Elephant and giraffe murderer Merelize van der Merwe used to love the fact that 400 people she termed “snowflakes” signed a petition seeking to ban her from Facebook. Now, in less than a month, our new petition aiming to achieve the same has topped 40,000.

Now, aside from banning us from commenting on her Facebook “public figure” page, van der Merwe has attempted to justify her actions by sharing a video of another monster, an American named Tess Talley, bragging about killing a giraffe also.

In doing so, this deranged deviant has yet again proven she’s nothing but clinically insane and again today we urge those that haven’t already to help get our Change.org petition to ban her from the social media medium past 50,000 signatures. Please do so by clicking here.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jIlJ61wwWQY
40,000 turn on Mental Monster Merelize van der Merwe – The YouTube video shared by Merelize van der Merwe as part of her campaign to justify massacring a giraffe featured another wicked wench who’d done the same thing named Tess Talley.

Deranged deviant Merelize van der Merwe on…

Death threats

“So, after all these death threats from people sitting comfortably behind a computer 15,000 kilometers away, it made me realise one thing… I haven’t hunted enough! So, I’ll go hunt some more tonight!”

Mental disorders

“We have seen mental disorders grow especially with social media giving these people a voice and openly expressing unnatural hatred towards people they never met with Instagram and Facebook. We in the hunting industry I’m sure deals [sic] with more of these unstable people then the psychiatric ward itself.”

“So please next time if someone attacks you for hunting, just remind them they forgot their pills this morning and let’s get these people under control.”

Truth and poetry and hunting

“Truth is like poetry and most people f**king hate poetry… Same when it comes to hunting and conservation people only listen to what they want to hear and not the truth.”

Liberals

“It’s just these new age liberals who piss and moan and say hunting isn’t natural… You aren’t natural.”

Kenya

“Kenya has sold its soul to the devil, AKA animal rights activists.”

Prince Harry

“Soon he’ll be back in diapers.”

Donald Trump

“I love Trump because he pisses off all the people I can’t stand.”

“What a privilege it was to look up to a President and know how a President should run a country. Today many are heartbroken across the world.”

“I salute you President Trump. What a man you are and may God bless you on your next chapter in life.”

On those that opposed Trump

“Eat a bag of dicks you dirty f**king communists.”

Celebrating killing an elephant

“After the elephant was down I went to buy beer and gin for team motivation. The next day I looked like a red crab.”

Why she likes killing elephants

“Tell me how hunting [elephants] doesn’t benefit people and the ecosystem.”

How she feels after a “kill”

“I was like a child for two weeks, counting the days. Afterwards I was flooded with emotions.”

People who protect elephants

“Never underestimate the power of stupid.”

People who object to the vile images she shares on social media

“To the dumb f**k who tried to report my video, take this and shove it where the sun doesn’t shine.”

“If you’re looking for a safe space, my page ain’t it… Move along, snowflake.”

Charity and hunting

“Charity is not sustainable, hunting is.”

Killing endangered species and conservation

“The only people protecting these animals are trophy hunters.”

Why she massacres endangered species

“In the end I’m nothing but yet another slave to this trade and a willing one too. The only time I find peace is living life on the edge. I firmly believe one is born like this and not made.”

“We will keep on fighting the animal rights mafia propaganda as hunting has proven sustainable for wildlife.”

“A day without blood is like a day without sunshine… Nature is not a Disney fairytale.”

40,000 turn on Mental Monster Merelize van der Merwe – In recent days Merelize van der Merwe (left) has posted about how she got malaria in Africa from the water and posed with a picture of herself “sipping a pink gin and tonic in Zambia” after “6 months non-stop 7 days a week of hunting.” She also lauded fellow mentally unhinged giraffe murderer (right) Tess Talley.

40,000 turn on Mental Monster Merelize van der Merwe – The disgraceful picture that made clinically crackers Merelize van der Merwe internationally infamous.

40,000 turn on Mental Monster Merelize van der Merwe – This monster has also taken pleasure in killing elephants and leopards. She must be banned by Facebook and her slaying of endangered species must be forever stopped.

March 8, 2021