Category: Incompetence

Why Destroy Evidence? Shocking Evidence Destruction By Police: Mark Alexander, Jeremy Bamber & Luke Mitchell Cases

As it is revealed that Scottish police disgracefully destroyed evidence in the Luke Mitchell case, we highlight two other equally shocking examples of police evidence destruction and call for reinvestigations of all three cases

Last night, in what he justifiably called a “bombshell” and announced as an “exclusive,” The Scottish Sun’s Douglas Walker revealed that Luke Mitchell, convicted of killing his girlfriend Jodi Jones in Dalkeith, Midloathian in 2003, “could sue prosecutors after it emerged they sanctioned the police to destroy evidence from the murder case.”

According to the paper:

“Cops illicitly destroyed protected evidence from the Jodi Jones murder case, we can reveal. More than 100 legal productions including burnt clothes were secretly uplifted for disposal – against police rules.”

“Now it’s emerged that Mitchell’s legal team could sue prosecutors after it emerged they sanctioned the police to destroy evidence from the murder case.”

“An insider revealed he could argue his right to an appeal has been hampered with Crown Office lawyers now desperate for assurances he won’t take them to court.”

“A letter from the Lord Advocate’s government solicitors admitted the evidence had been taken away – and confirmed destruction had now been halted.”

Continuing, “an insider told The Scottish Sun” that:

“A load of officers from the Major Investigation Team went to Edinburgh to remove over 100 productions. This included some burnt clothes found about a thousand metres from the locus.”

“They loaded boxes into a police van and took them to Livingston police station. The Crown Office had signed off the items to be returned to the owner or destroyed. This is not normal procedure, especially in a murder case.”

“Mitchell could now argue his right to a fair appeal has been denied as evidence has been destroyed. This could lead to a judicial review which could even pave a way to his release.”

Far from being this a lone example of incompetence on the part of Lothian and Borders Police, as we highlighted in our article yesterday about the ongoing campaign to get the 1986 conviction of Jeremy Bamber revisited by the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC), there are sadly many more examples where similar antics have gone on.

In the case of Bamber, critical evidence was burnt in the garden of White House Farm and taken home by officers by Essex Police even and in a further example, that of Mark Alexander, who has been in jail for killing his conman father since 2010, it was just as bad.

Found guilty without any forensic evidence and with the help of Midsomer Murders-esque “suspicious neighbours primarily, supporters of Alexander rightly highlight that the prosecution withheld critical information from trial that included that four potential suspects – who police never bothered to speak to – were never even mentioned to the jury.

Going further and summing up what led to the conviction of Alexander, Progressing Prisoners Maintaining Innocence (PPMI), observed: “Another example of typical factors in a wrongful conviction: no forensic evidence, impossible time frame for the crime to be committed, witness put off by the police, important witnesses not interviewed, lurid allegations in the press published before they could be countered, all racked up by such sad personal circumstances.”

It is time for all three cases to be revisited and at the very least those officers that destroyed key documents and items must be quite rightly be brought to book. Justice is never just if it is based on the police manipulating the evidence that gets that very justice.

Editor’s Note – Unlike as is the case in many publications, this article was NOT sponsored or supported by a third-party.

Pictured Top – Left to right: Luke Mitchell, Jeremy Bamber and Mark Alexander; three men who remain in prison and convicted of murder in spite of there being significant evidence of police mishandling of evidence in each of their unlinked cases.

Evidence Destruction By Police – Campaigns Supporting Mark Alexander, Jeremy Bamber and Luke Mitchell

Here are three men who continue to rot in prison. Each may or may not be guilty of the murders they were convicted of committing. However, though, the protests of innocence of each man should be judged on the merits and failings of each case alone, what links these three men is that the police very, very clearly shockingly botched the handling of evidence that led to each of their convictions.

Each man – Mark Alexander, Jeremy Bamber and Luke Mitchell – as a result of a questioning public and critical experts highlighting the flaws in their cases, has attracted large support. More details about the campaigns seeking reinvestigations into each of their cases follows:

MARK ALEXANDER – Convicted of the murder of his father in 2010; has never ceased maintaining his innocence

To follow the ‘Justice for Mark Alexander’ group on Facebook, click here, and to follow the campaign seeking a review of the case on Twitter go to @PatientCaptive. Prominent supporters include the former Conservative MP for Westminster The Rt. Hon. Mark Field, the Reverend Canon Grant Fellows, the Right Reverend Bishop Tim Stevens and the hostage-turned-humanitarian Terry Waite CBE

JEREMY BAMBER – Convicted of murder of 5 members of his family in 1986; has never ceased maintaining his innocence

To learn more about the Jeremy Bamber Innocence Campaign – whose supporters number former MP Andrew Hunter, barrister Flo Krause, human rights campaigner Peter Tatchell and magistrate Lady Waterlow – and to join those calling for a reinvestigation of this case, click here. Follow on Twitter at @BamberTweets and join the ‘Jeremy Bamber Justice Group’ by clicking here.

LUKE MITCHELL – Convicted of the murder of his girlfriend in 2005; has never ceased maintaining his innocence

To join the official Facebook group focused on highlighting the supposed flaws in the police investigation that led to the conviction of Luke Mitchell, click here. To join the 25,400 people who have already signed the Change.org petition requesting a “full, independent review” of the Luke Mitchell case, click here.

Earlier this month, Tom Halliday (pictured), a Midlothian car mechanic turned bathroom designer and fitter, revealed that he found a knife in a skip just 500 yards from where the body of schoolgirl Jodi Jones was found just days after her 30th June 2003 murder. He reported it the police and spoke out again now after recently finding out that his find was never even mentioned let alone submitted during the trial. Mr Halliday commented: “Nobody placed any importance on that knife. When I learned it wasn’t documented, it raised my suspicions the police may have tried to conceal the discovery.” Going further, a lawyer for Luke Mitchell, Scott Forbes, added: “This is the real missing knife… It was either destroyed went missing if it didn’t fit the police narrative.”

Amongst items not only never shown to the court at the trial of Jeremy Bamber was this bible. Though photographed by Essex Police at the crime scene next to the body of Sheila Caffell – the only other suspect in these familial murders – it was shockingly destroyed. “What motivated officers to do this?” remains a question that very clearly ought to be answered.

In April 2020, ‘The Steeple Times’ reported that “further questions about the conduct of Essex Police [were] raised as it [was] revealed they destroyed the bible, nightclothes and pillows that were found with the victims at White House Farm on the night of the 1985 murders. The 20th March 2000 letter from the Criminal Cases Review Commission to Glaisyers Solicitors LLP and Sheila Caffell is truly a shocking example of a bungling balls-up.

Of how the police handled the investigation into his father’s murder in 2009 and the discovery of his body subsequently at his home at 2 Prospect Close, Drayton Parslow, Milton Keynes, Buckinghamshire, MK17 0JB, Mark Alexander observed: “Once I was in their sights, things went downhill pretty quickly. Supporting testimony offered by my mum in police interview wasn’t shared with my defence team. Samples taken at the burial site weren’t bagged correctly, so degraded in transit before they could ever be tested. When I gave officers a list of dad’s aliases, the leads weren’t followed. And despite there being no sign of the murder itself having taken place at the house, no efforts were made to search the local area for clues. Instead of being guided by the facts, the facts were reinterpreted to fit the suspect, me. The pathology reports gave a two-month window within which dad’s death might have occurred. Everything then focused on fixing the murder as close as possible to the beginning of that window in order to provide me with just enough time and motive to render what they already believed to be true plausible. It was classic confirmation bias.”

November 30, 2022
Could Convicted Killer Luke Mitchell Actually Be Innocent?

As a 25,000 strong petition is set to be delivered to the Scottish Parliament, we join those asking: “Could convicted killer Luke Mitchell be innocent of the murder of his girlfriend Jodi Jones?”

After hostage-turned-humanitarian Terry Waite CBE highlighted flaws in the September 2010 conviction of Mark Alexander, The Steeple Times examined that case and joined those campaigning for, at the very least, a review of the evidence gathered by a police force who we believe simply wanted a quick and easy conviction.

A campaign remains ongoing in that matter and after also taking up the botched Essex Police investigation into the March 2001 rape and murder of Stuart Lubbock at the home the since disgraced television ‘personality’ Michael Barrymore, we have also delved into the many issues surrounding other potentially unsafe convictions. Amongst those we’ve repeatedly highlighted are that of the October 1986 jailing of Jeremy Bamber – whose case is currently with the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) – and that of the clear victims of parental abuse, the jailed for all of eternity Menendez brothers, in America also.

Often highlighted wrongly as the “Scottish ‘Black Dahlia’ case,” the case of the brutal murder of a 14-year-old schoolgirl named Jodie Jones in Dalkeith, Scotland on 30^th June 2003 is another example of a case that continually attracts claims that the convicted perpetrator could actually be innocent.

Whilst Lothian and Borders Police successfully pinned the blame of Miss Jones’s murder on her boyfriend, Luke Mitchell, and secured his conviction in January 2005, tomorrow, Wednesday 16^th November, his legal team will deliver a petition signed by 25,000 individuals to the Scottish Parliament demanding “an urgent and fully independent inquiry.” They believe the conviction to be unsafe and cite that “upto 122 items gathered as part of the investigation into the death were never forensically tested.”

Mitchell – who had been dating Jones for four months prior to her murder – was found guilty of killing her by hitting her on the head and body, compressing her neck, restricting her breathing and stabbing her both before and after she died in January 2005. He was sentenced to serve a minimum of twenty years in prison and though several attempts to overturn his conviction have failed, he continues to protest his innocence.

Recently, Scott Mitchell, who has been the lawyer for Mitchell since 2010 but also involved with the case since 2003, remarked:

“Forensic science has improved dramatically. I believe DNA samples that went untested will overhaul the conviction if we can examine them now. Without a doubt, that will prove Luke Mitchell did not kill Jodi.”

A full statement regarding the alleged failings in the case brought by Lothian and Borders Police follows after the videos and photographs beneath this article. It has been compiled by supporters of Luke Mitchell, a dedicated group who have been in touch with The Steeple Times for many months now.

To join the official Facebook group focused on highlighting the supposed flaws in the police investigation that led to the conviction of Luke Mitchell, click here.

To join the 25,400 people who have already signed the Change.org petition requesting a “full, independent review” of the Luke Mitchell case, click here.

Pictured Top – Luke Mitchell with his mother, Corrine.

Editor’s Note – Unlike as is the case in many publications, this article was NOT sponsored or supported by a third-party.

If the wrong man is indeed in jail for the 2003 murder of Jodi Jones, her killer is likely still alive and still at large and still evading justice. If that is the case, Lothian and Borders Police have a lot of questions to answer as to why they didn’t correctly deal with the evidence available to them.

It’s easy for police to pin the blame most especially on young men and in the case of the 2010 conviction of Mark Alexander – pictured here with hostage-turned-humanitarian Terry Waite CBE on the day he graduated in jail – the complete lack of forensic evidence in his conviction for his deviant father is very, very, very troubling. His case deserves to be revisited given all the new evidence that has been found.

Two cases involving that of the 1986 conviction of Jeremy Bamber (left) and the 2001 murder of Stuart Lubbock (right) raise questions as to how Essex Police bungled the investigations by mismanaging evidence and making countless errors. We believe both cases should at the very, very least be reinvestigated due to the clear incompetence of this particular police force.

In America, the July 1996 jailing of brothers Erik and Lyle Menendez for life without parole rightly continues to be condemned as an outrage given that the evil parents they slayed were clearly both guilty of having abused them consistently until their 20th August 1989 deaths in Beverly Hills, California. These repeatedly sexually abused brothers should have been convicted of manslaughter and they should now be freed.

Text supplied by a member of the Facebook group supporting Luke Mitchell that explains their take on why they believe him to be innocent of the 2003 murder…

The murder of Jodi Jones, a 14-year-old girl, took place in Dalkeith, Scotland on 30^th June 2003. Her 14-year-old boyfriend, Luke Mitchell, came under suspicion, but it was several months before he was arrested.

Mitchell was tried for the murder and after Scotland’s longest single-accused trial at that time, Mitchell was convicted by a majority verdict in January 2005 despite there being no direct evidence against him. He was sentenced to a detention without limit of time with a minimum punishment part of 20-years. He has always maintained his innocence.

Jodi Jones left her house after exchanging a series of text messages with her boyfriend Luke Mitchell at around 5pm. She was found horrifically mutilated in a woodland strip behind a six-foot high wall at 11:35pm.

Her boyfriend Luke Mitchell and his dog Mia found her along with Jodi’s sister, Jodi’s sister’s boyfriend and her gran while they searched the path together.

Upon arrival the police separated Luke from the rest of the search party and took him to Dalkeith police station to be forensically examined. The police did not consider the rest of the search party as important witnesses until almost five hours into the investigation. Their clothing would not be taken for examination until around six days after the murder. By the time they were handed in they had either been laundered or different items to the ones said to be worn on that night were handed in to the police.

Forensics arrived at the scene at 8am the following morning, some time prior to this, two identification officers had gathered up all Jodi’s clothing and belongings but they didn’t record how they were collected or packaged.

Jodi was rolled onto a plastic sheet, branches were cut down to make the scene more accessible and the body was not covered leaving any potential evidence exposed to the rain. No attempt was made to estimate the time of death, there are no records of liver temperature, or signs of rigor or livor mortis.

Bin collections still went ahead that day, as did council hedge cutting, and the high school very close by was open as normal with students using the surrounding paths to access the school, while Jodi’s body still lay there uncovered.

Due to the way the crime scene was managed, a lot of potential evidence was destroyed. Despite this there was one full DNA sample recovered from Jodi’s clothing which was a match to another member of the search party, Jodi’s sister’s boyfriend, one semen sample from a condom nearby Jodi’s body and three full samples of DNA which have yet to be matched to anybody. There were many other partial samples found made up of blood, semen and saliva. There was no DNA from Luke Mitchell found.

Despite having other leads to follow and forensic evidence from the scene pointing away from Luke Mitchell, the investigation remained focused on him throughout. The general feeling in the area was that Luke Mitchell would be arrested any day now. In fact, it would take ten months for the police to make an arrest, one which was based on a wholly circumstantial case. During those ten months the media reported almost daily coverage of the case. Luke Mitchell and his mother, Corrine were shot to infamy overnight.

With no direct evidence linking Luke to the crime, the investigation focused in on music and ‘goth culture’ in an attempt to explain why Luke might have murdered Jodi. Both Luke and Jodi were a part of the ‘nu-metal wave’ that was popular during the early 2000s as were many of their friends. The police thought this was important to the investigation and told the media, only five days after the murder;

“We will be looking at what Jodi and her social circle were interested in and an obvious area will be their ties to the Goth movement. We will be examining if the manner in which she was killed has any links to the violent world that many Goths find fascinating and will be speaking to all her friends who had similar interests.”

Fear swept through Dalkeith and the rumour mill went into overdrive. Luke’s school jotters, with quotes from popular video games scrawled across the front were used to imply he had a fascination with the devil.

Police statements reveal that they were asked to search Luke Mitchell’s house for anything related to the singer Marilyn Manson. The police investigation believed that Luke was obsessed with Manson and in particular a series of paintings done by the artist depicting the body of murder victim Elizabeth Short, more commonly known as ‘The Black Dahlia.’

The crown put to the jury that Mitchell was attempting to replicate the killing of Elizabeth Short. In contrast to this, the pathologist who examined Jodi’s body said that there were markedly dissimilarities between the injuries sustained by Elizabeth Short and Jodi Jones and any similarities were superficial.

The only things related to Marilyn Manson that were found during the search of Mitchell’s home was a torn-up calendar and a CD that he had bought two days after the murder. There was no evidence found on Luke’s computer that he had accessed these paintings and the officer who found them online said they were not easy to find.

After ten months of press coverage naming 14-year-old Luke Mitchell as the only suspect and portraying him as a Satanist obsessed with Marilyn Manson, black magic and the occult, was there any need for evidence to convince the judge and jury?

At appeal the crown decided that the Marilyn Manson and Black Dahlia evidence was not to be founded upon. The evidence that had been the backbone of the investigation into Luke Mitchell for ten months, kept the focus on Luke when all other evidence was pointing away from him, and had led to a 14-year-old child being portrayed as already guilty in the press before he was arrested and charged was not to be founded upon.

Discarding the evidence that had been used to portray Luke Mitchell as a killer obsessed with occult rituals and the devil, the crown set out three main pillars of evidence with twenty adminicles of evidence interwoven between these main pillars, that they believe the jury was entitled to base a guilty verdict on. The guilty verdict was based on broad presumptions and inferences in the crown’s case which contradicts exculpatory evidence put forward by the defence.

The circumstantial evidence that was used to convict Luke Mitchell does not hold up to scrutiny.

Pillar one is concerned with guilty knowledge. The crown claimed that Luke Mitchell had knowledge of where Jodi’s body was and that he led the search party straight to it. During the trial the other three members of the search party claimed that on the night of 30^th June, Luke had led them to the body and that he was cold and emotionless.

During the first month of the investigation statements taken by these other three members of the search party were consistent with Luke’s version of events – that he had walked past the V-break in the wall, his dog was ‘air sniffing’ and jumping up at the wall so he doubled back and climbed over the V-break. All of the statements began to change after that first month in similar ways to imply that Luke led them right to Jodi’s body.

Pillar two was the evidence of witness ‘AB’ who claimed she had seen a male and a female at the Easthouses end of the path. Despite the descriptions she gave not matching Luke or Jodi and the timing of the sighting contradicting two other witness sightings by people who knew Jodi and the witness herself failing to identify Luke Mitchell in the dock, this sighting was accepted by the jury and is used to infer that Luke Mitchell was at the Easthouses end of the path and in the company of Jodi before her death.

Pillar three, Luke’s alibi. Luke claimed that he was at home cooking dinner at the time of the murder, this is corroborated by two landline telephone calls until 16:25, and his mother and brother [Shane Mitchell, hereby referenced as ‘SM’] from 16:25 to 17:30. He left his house at around 17:30 to wait for Jodi at the end of his street, where he was seen acting normally and wearing the same clothes he had on earlier at school that day, by a couple of boys who knew him. The investigation would not accept Luke’s alibi.

Luke’s mum and brother were charged with perverting the course of justice. These charges would later be dropped without the jury’s knowledge, just before Luke’s mother gave evidence in the trial.

When he was arrested for perverting the course of justice, ‘SM’ was subjected to the same nature of questioning that the police had used on Luke.

At appeal, judges described the nature of this questioning as “abhorrent,” saying “at times the nature of the questioning was such that the questioner did not seem to be interested in a response from the appellant, but rather endeavouring to break him down into giving some hoped for confession by his over bearing and hostile interrogation” (2008 appeal).

‘SM’ was told that if he didn’t tell the police what they wanted to hear he would go to jail for three years. At trial, ‘SM’ told the court, not that his brother was not in that evening but that he couldn’t be sure. The actions of the liaison officer that was assigned to the Mitchell family and who took ‘SM’s’ statement also came under fire at trial. She refused to accept what ‘SM’ was telling her instead using leading phrases like “picture this” and telling ‘SM’: “I can’t accept that.” She eventually conceded on the stand that the investigation was a “shambles.”

This is a case where the police focused in on a suspect based on lifestyle and image, despite having knowledge of exculpatory evidence and ignored or at the very least did not thoroughly investigate incriminating evidence pointing to others.

Should a 14-year old child be imprisoned for life based on a weak circumstantial case when there is DNA evidence found on the victim that doesn’t match him and is yet to be identified?

When you see through the moral panic that swept through the police investigation and the small town of Dalkeith is there really enough evidence to convict Luke Mitchell of murder and can it really be said that justice has been served for Jodi Jones?

November 15, 2022
From Loser To Lord – Should Shameless Shaun Bailey Be Elevated To House of Lords?

Though Tory twerp Shaun Bailey got away with partying with billionaire Nick Candy during the 2020 lockdowns, that this ludicrous loser and electoral disaster area might now get a seat in the House of Lords courtesy of his chum Boris Johnson is utterly outrageous

Whilst the dimwitted dunce Emma Dent-Coad was shown to be an abhorrent bigot when she described Shaun Bailey, the subsequently trounced and utterly inept Conservative London mayoral candidate in May 2021, as a “token ghetto boy,” that he might now make it to the House of Lords is frankly ludicrous.

Beyond batshit bonkers Bailey, who partied with the billionaire property tycoon Nick Candy in December 2020 at Conservative Central Office in spite of strict lockdown rules being in place at the time, it was yesterday revealed was subject to no action. In a statement, the Metropolitan Police shared that “there was not enough to ‘disprove the version of events provided by attendees,’” The Guardian’s political correspondent Peter Walker yesterday reported.

Whilst countless ordinary folk were fined and named and shamed, that the hapless police force then headed by the disastrous dimwit Dame Cressida Dick opted to let off the pontificating pillock Bailey is an utter outrage, but what is worse is that it has also been suggested that Boris Johnson has nominated him for a seat in the House of Lords in his resignation honours list.

A self-declared “different dude” who has branded himself “gobby and dangerous,” Bailey not only lost to Sadiq Khan but also offered idiotic policies such as giving free burglar alarms to pensioners. He once also suggested that the 60,000 plus “homeless people in the capital would be able to save up for a £5,000 deposit to buy a share in a newly-built affordable home.”

Going further, in 2005, Bailey made a berk of himself by claiming “accommodating Muslims and Hindus” in the UK was “robbing Britain of its community.” His nonsense was clearly shown to be such given the 2011 census revealed that 40.2% of London’s population to be non-white.

Another blunder came in since quite rightly removed comments he left on the Conservative Women’s Organisation website. There, he observed: “If you could get girls to accept less of men’s rubbish then men would have to change because ultimately men are after a girl.”

Is this moronic man fit for elevation to the House of Lords? The answer is unequivocally: “NO!”

Pictured top – This likely future Lord claimed to offer “a fresh start for London” yet the electorate simply thought he was selling washing powder. They didn’t like the quality of his powder and they universally rejected this gobby goon and sent him packing; why then is he suitable for the House of Lords?

Editor’s Note – Unlike as is the case in many publications, this article was NOT sponsored or supported by a third-party.

Who’s more stupid and who is ghastlier: Shaun Bailey or Owen Jones? During a 16:29 minute YouTube feature in May 2019, Bailey declared: “Nobody has a monopoly on common sense,” but then went on to prove he’s totally lacking in even an ounce of such.

Shaun Bailey pictured with Nick Candy and others at a Christmas party during lockdown 2020 at Conservative Central Office at 4 Matthew Parker Street, London, SW1H 9HQ.

Shaun Bailey with Boris Johnson. The fact that the pair “get on well” was proof enough that the loopy wannabe Mayor of London was unfit for high office.

That Shaun Bailey was also snapped “minglin’” with Priti Patel illustrated the low qualities of those he chose to associate with him. That a woman voted a “snitch” and a “neighbour from hell” was someone he opted to be snapped with on the campaign trail was proof enough that he simply didn’t have his finger on the pulse.

The now former London mayoral candidate with former Prime Minister David Cameron. The smug look on this duo’s faces sums up the “f**k the rest of you” attitude of these opportunists; here is a pair whose involvement in politics has caused nothing but disaster for everyone whilst their own pockets get deeper.

In January 2019, ‘The Red Roar’ reported Bailey was forced to return donations to his campaign from an “impermissible donor” linked to the Paradise Papers scandal. His judgment is so piss poor that quite rightly now the public are quite rightly outraged that he could be elevated to the House of Lords.

November 12, 2022
Grim, Gobby Grimes Gone – Bombastic Brexit Bore Darren Grimes Axed By GB News

As ghastly, gobby and grim Darren Grimes gets axed by GB News, we call for the complete cancellation of a bombastic Brexit bore known best for pulling a Diane Abbott in wearing mismatching footwear

Self-declared “Northerner that says it how it is” Darren Grimes fits into the same category as Tom Harwood, Owen Jones and Omid Scobie in terms of being considered utterly irksome. With his nasty nasal twang and a Priti Patel-like use of language when he’s “scramblin’,” “wavin’” and “invadin’,” here is a tedious twerp who made even right-wing viewers of GB News turn off.

Now “abruptly cancelled” – according to Wikipedia – by GB News, Liberal Democrat turned right-wing Brexiteer Grimes took to Twitter on 4^th November and declared:

“Sadly, my GB News show, Real Britain, is ending in a few weeks. I want to make its last few episodes on air the best of all. Thank you from the bottom of my heart to those who have loyally tuned in and supported me and the channel – it has been the greatest ride of my life!”

Responding on the social media network, most were unsympathetic of the plight of this County Durham born 29-year-old. One observed that GB News had “caused distress to his one viewer” whilst another added: “Good riddance to @Darren_Grimes: A vile racist and sh*t stirrer. May they all tumble, one after the other.”

Whilst Christine Hamilton proved herself a lone voice of support in stating: “You will be much missed” and adding “you will succeed whatever,” the cancellation of the founder of the since disgraced BeLeave campaign is something that has unsurprisingly been widely celebrated. It is now simply time for something else and that is to banish dimwitted Darren Grimes to Siberia for once and for all.

Pictured top – Darren Grimes (left) on a beach with what appears to be a small man running up his arm and a “coming soon” sign behind him; mockery of this “half-witted t***er” is unsurprisingly widespread on social media (right).

Rather like Diane Abbott, here is a tedious twerp who doesn’t appear able to match his footwear. Pictured at his beloved Newcastle United Football Club in a white shoe and a black shoe, Grimes has also been repeatedly subjected to widescale discussion of what he used to get upto whilst in the classroom as a child in year nine. “I’m not messing about,” he whimpered before not doing anything about his accusers.

Mocked widely on social media channels, the now axed GB News presenter is nothing but a disaster and a joke.

The diatribe of drivel that came from the mouth of ‘Grim Grimes’ clearly made viewers of even the right-wing news channel GB News turn off. His “I’m English and I’m damn well proud to be so” message didn’t even resonate with Brexiteers and BNP and EDL fanatics and now it is time that he was simply cancelled permanently.

Darren Grimes on Twitter…

Though he thought his time presenting ‘Real Britain’ the “greatest ride of my life!” the viewing public clearly felt otherwise and hence GB News unsurprisingly axed this very boring berk.

His Twitter handle speaks volumes… “Media personality” is hardly the way someone with a viewing audience of just the “mam” he bangs on about so much would be described by anyone with half-a-brain.

Though ‘Dim Dazzer’ seems to find most of his ‘fans’ on Twitter, he slammed it on the 6th November with the remark: “You virtue signaling cesspit.”

On the 5th November also, one of his videos was unsurprisingly removed from TikTok after it was deemed to be “hate speech.”

Trying to make out he’d actually had messages offering him “support and encouragement,” on the 5th November ‘Dopey Darren’ declared: “Don’t worry, I’m not going to stop making videos! I’ll be on your screens in some format!” God help the viewing public if that proves true.

Returning to type a day later, the opinionated oaf took his fury out on those calling him out and childishly branded someone who’d condemned him as “Mr Britain-loathing Liberal Democrat.”

This morning, very predictably, the now axed presenter got very, very, very upset over the cancellation of Boris Johnson’s pet project ‘royal yacht’ replacement by Rishi Sunak’s government. “Could it be that the left just doesn’t like anything associated with Britain?” he whined.

Reaction to ‘Crafty W*nk’ being cancelled and removed from television screens…

November 8, 2022
Moron of the Moment 2022 – Twittering Twerp Diane Abbott MP

That motormouthed MP Diane Abbott took to Twitter to defend a migrant rapist simply shows her as an utter twerp; perhaps, instead, she should focus on controlling her own son – a brat who likes to go around exposing himself – instead first

In January 2020, Diane Abbott MP’s son, James Abbott-Thompson, was charged with nine assaults, exposure and racially aggravated criminal damage. By March that year, aside from having exposed himself, this then 28-year-old had also spat at and punched one police officer and bitten the thumb of another, yet now his mother thinks she can wade into the migrant crisis and share her views on alleged sexual assaults.

Ms Abbott, a woman well known to be of mind stir-fried, took to Twitter last week and announced: “Teenage boy raped at hotel housing refugees. Terrible case. But it is what happens when you demonise migrants take NO responsibility for safeguarding migrant children.”

Going further in spite of very rightly being condemned for sharing such a glaringly inappropriate and morally repugnant excuse for rape, she continued: “My earlier tweet regarding the rape of the teenager in the migrant home may have been slightly raw in context but I maintain my theory, you treat migrants like rapists then they are going to behave like rapists.”

Strangely, this mother of a clearly wayward wastrel, then deleted the second tweet. Strange that, very strange indeed; shame on Diane Abbott and shame on all those who’ve subsequently come out and excused her wicked words.

The weird, weird words of the Labour Member of Parliament for Hackney North and Stoke Newington

On the ex-Labour leader, who she used to ‘enjoy’ sexual relations with, Jeremy Corbyn:

“Jeremy is always right.”

On his replacement as Labour leader (but not as her lover, allegedly) Sir Keir Starmer MP:

“Talks nonsense… Is quite strange.”

“On the question of Keir Starmer, I think we have to look at some of his advisors. It now seems that Peter Mandelson is a top advisor to Keir Starmer.”

“We only have to look at Peter Mandelson’s life and times to understand where he stands in relation to the wealthy and the powerful.”

“I think Keir Starmer’s problems are his advisors and he needs to be listening to his own party and grass roots party members more.”

“Keir Starmer’s people are spinning it, but in 2017, people forget you know, Jeremy got more votes than any other Labour leader and, you know, if he hadn’t had most of the PLP attacking him night and day, he might possibly have won in 2017.”

Responding to be accused of not being able to add up:

“I do know my figures.”

“Of course, I think things through.”

“I’m here, of course I’m here. I’m doing a media interview, I’m going on to do another media interview. There’s no truth that I’m not in the media talking about what happened.”

“I think I’m Shadow Home Secretary.”

Diane Abbott on the cost of recruiting 10,000 police officers:

“If we recruit 10,000 police officers, men and women, over a four year period, we believe it will be about £300,000… Sorry, I mean, they will cost, it will cost, erm, about £80 million.”

“We will be paying them the average, it’s been thought through. Of course it’s been thought through.”

“What we said is, of course, we’ll find the money to recruit the 10,000 police people by cutting the, cutting the money… I think that would give us 170, erm, sorry… We would find the money by restoring levels of capital gains tax.”

On racism:

“The British invented racism.”

“White people love playing divide and rule. We should not play their game… I don’t think saying that is racist… It was part of a sequenced debate that I said that.”

“We need unity between black, Asian, minority ethnic and Muslim people – we need the maximum public show of unity. Because time after time, in the past 32 years, I’ve seen efforts of people to organise disrupted by white people.”

On dogs:

“I was a postman one Christmas and I developed a morbid fear of dogs.”

On her own marriage:

“I wanted my marriage to work, but it didn’t.”

On “outsiders” and “insiders”:

“Outsiders often have an insight than an insider doesn’t quite have.”

On being an MP:

“Being an MP is a good job, the sort of job all working-class parents want for their children – clean, indoors and no heavy lifting. What could be nicer?”

“I want power. I suppose that’s the story of my life – seeking power.”

“I’m in politics to be a voice for people who don’t have a voice.”

On the Kurdistan Workers’ Party:

“There is no difference between the PKK and ISIS.”

On the vile piece of toerag and one-time friend of Ghislaine Maxwell and the late croaked paedophile Jeffrey Epstein that is Naomi Campbell:

“I am a fangirl of Naomi Campbell.”

On why she wanted to be Labour’s candidate to be Mayor of London:

“One of my advantages, if I was Labour’s candidate, is that loads of people know me. I’m not just talking about politics – they’ve seen me on Come Dine With Me, they’ve seen me on Pointless.”

“I am not associated with the past.”

On women in Northern Ireland:

“Women in Northern Ireland are second class citizens.”

Diane Abbott on supporting the IRA:

“Defeat for the British state would be a great liberation. A defeat in Northern Ireland would be a defeat indeed.”

On supposedly changing her views on supporting the IRA:

“It was 34 years ago, I had a rather splendid afro at the time. I don’t have the same hairstyle, I don’t’ have the same views. It was 34 years on. The hairstyle is gone, some of the views are gone.”

On supposedly changing her views about MI5:

“At that time, I and a lot of people felt MI5 needed reforming. It has since been reformed and, of course, I would not call for its abolition now. That MI5 has gone. It’s been reformed, it’s a different MI5 and that’s why so many of us are able to support it now.”

Diane Abbott on Mao Zedong:

“I suppose some people will judge that on balance Mao did more good than harm… He led his country from feudalism, he helped to defeat the Japanese and he left his country on the verge of the great economic success they are having now. I was just putting the case for Mao.”

Insulting white mothers:

“West Indian mums will go to the wall for their children.”

On being a mother:

“I put being a mother ahead of being a politician.”

On the son she sent to a private school, who went on to commit various criminal offences:

“I knew what could happen to my son if he was sent to the wrong school and got in with the wrong crowd.”

On abortion:

“Abortion is an issue of conscience for the Labour party.”

“I believe every abortion is a tragedy.”

Diane Abbott on sex:

“Of course, sex is great. We don’t have to pretend otherwise.”

On masculinity:

“There is a crisis of masculinity in Britain because of the pressures rapid economic and social change have placed on masculine identity. A generation of men are in transit and unclear of their social role. They are also under pressure to live up to pornified ideals.”

Diane Abbott on her decision to send her criminal son to a private school:

“[It was] indefensible and intellectually incoherent.”

“I’m not the only Labour MP who sent their child to public school, but I’m the only one who’s questioned about it.”

On parenting:

“When fast food is not a treat but a dietary staple, the children surf the Internet all day in dark corners of the room and are bombarded with the latest gadgets. Things replace parental standards.”

“Tackling obesity is key… Families are struggling against a tide of junk information on junk food.”

On being demoted to the backbenches:

“I was a backbencher for a few years and there is an awful lot to do on the backbenches.”

On her political strategy:

“[I am going to stop Labour going into a] dead end.”

“In politics, the people I most despise are those who have no values.”

On defending the indefensible:

“You can’t defend the indefensible. Anything you say sounds self-serving and hypocritical.”

On her many mistakes:

“You learn from your mistakes.”

On her future plans:

“I want to write a best-selling book.”

On being intensely disliked:

“[I am the] most abused of any Labour MP ever.”

And a final word from Diane Abbott herself:

“This is going round in circles… I’ve got nothing more to say, I’ve got nothing more to say.”

One of several recent tweets by the Labour Member of Parliament for Hackey North and Stoke Newington that rightly enraged members of the public. With a mouth larger than China and more front than Harrods, here, yet again, is just another example of why this ridiculous woman is totally unfit for high office.

Twitter reacts to Jeremy Corbyn’s former lover @HackneyAbbott making a twerp of herself yet again on Twitter…

November 6, 2022
Moron of the Moment 2022 – Immigrant Hater Natalie Elphicke OBE MP

Immigrant hater Natalie Elphicke OBE MP should be reminded that she, the wife of a convicted sex offender, is the noxious nasty who actually deserves to be hated

In March this year, The Steeple Times slammed the “total plonker” Conservative Member of Parliament for Dover, Natalie Elphicke, over her pathetic handling of the sacking of 800 P&O ferry workers by Zoom after she deservedly got heckled at a protest in support of their rights.

Unsurprisingly called out then also as a “stunningly stupid woman who once ludicrously suggested “border issues at Dover were not a problem created by Brexit, but were Brussels’ fault,” this 51-year-old first took her seat in December 2019 and now, this morning, she showed herself up when she penned yet another of her regular rants for The Mail on Sunday.

Previously, Dover had been the domain of her husband, Charlie – a cretinous creep known for running around the marital home yelling: “I’m a naughty Tory” as he went about groping horrified visiting ladies. Mr Elphicke was subsequently thrown in the slammer in July 2020 after being convicted of three counts of sexual assault against two women.

In today’s column, which was titled: “When will The Left admit this is no refugee crisis… but simply illegal immigration,” Mrs Elphicke blamed everyone but her own party for refugees landing daily on British shores. “They are not fleeing wars,” she raged, before adding: “The injustice affects everyone… Not that you’d know it from the handwringing rights industry, the charity sector and the skewed reporting of the issue from the Left-wing media and the BBC.”

Instead of seeking a solution on British shores, this heartless multi-millionaire mother-of-two simply offered: “It is undoubtedly the case that more can be done in France” before demanding “an immediate solution.” Idealistic, yes, realistic no and achievable, most definitely not.

Frankly, all this latest column does is to provide further indication that here is an impractical woman unfit to represent the 72,000 people of her constituency. It is now jolly well time for ‘Nasty Nat’ to finally do the decent thing – resign and make way for someone who might actually help work towards a solution to this very real problem; a very real problem that affects both those arriving in Britain and those already living in Dover and beyond.

Immigrant hater Natalie Elphicke OBE MP turned up to court regularly with her husband during his trial for sexual assault. She openly supported him and smiled for the cameras willingly alongside him, but as soon as he was convicted she took £25,000 from ‘The Sun’ for a negative story about him. Just days later, she changed her mind yet again and claimed her criminal hubby had been punished for being “charming, wealthy and successful – attractive, and attracted to, women.” She dismissed the claims of his accusers as nonsense and then, along with four other MPs (Sir Roger Gale, Theresa Villiers, Adam Holloway and Bob Stewart), were censored for using parliamentary notepaper to improperly pestering the judiciary with “naughty notes” trying to get the rotten sex offender off in November 2020. Here is a woman incapable of making up her mind and sticking to a single belief; here is a woman wholeheartedly unfit to be a Member of Parliament.

I came across a discarded small boat on the beach in Dover earlier.

Many more illegal arrivals again today.

We must get a grip on the small boats crisis and stop boats like this arriving on our shores. pic.twitter.com/8y7bvapk0q
— Natalie Elphicke Ross OBE (@NatalieElphicke) October 29, 2022

Yesterday, the MP shared a video in a tweet caption: “I came across a discarded small boat on the beach in Dover earlier. Many more illegal arrivals again today. We must get a grip on the small boats crisis and stop boats like this arriving on our shores.” Instead of telling those poor souls seeking asylum to “get a grip,” she ought first to “get a grip” and deal with the continuing fallout from her husband’s convictions and her efforts to clear this filthy pervert’s rotten name.

Twitter reacts to the Member of Parliament for Dover’s latest antics…

October 30, 2022
Dopey Dent Coad Ditched – Kensington Labour Rejects Emma Dent Coad

Matthew Steeples suggests mouthy ex-MP Emma Dent Coad’s latest moan about how Labour have ditched her as a future candidate show her for what she is; a sore loser and a far-left hectoring harridan

Ten days ago, ex-MP for Kensington Emma Dent Coad – a hectoring harridan with a penchant for using the block button on Twitter to anyone who dares calls out her diatribe of drivel – issued a statement after she was excluded from being on Labour’s longlist of prospective candidates for the next election.

At the time, the far-left royal hater whined that she was “devastated” and “angry.” She moaned also that her party had “unjustly” prevented her from “standing for the seat I won just five years ago, the seat I came agonisingly close to holding even in 2019, despite the trade union backing which should have seen me longlisted automatically.” The now 67-year-old had won in 2017 by just 20 votes over Tory Lady ‘Call me Victoria’ Borwick and lost by 150 in 2019 to Felicity ‘Flicka’ Buchan, also a Conservative.

Dent Coad – who was deservedly slammed in 2017 for having used the racist description “token ghetto boy” of the then Conservative mayoral candidate Shaun Bailey in 2010 – is now being made into a martyr with Novara Media’s Andrew Fisher describing her exclusion as “factional manouverings” that will be a “self-defeating… slap in the face” for Labour and Sir Keir Starmer. He titled his ridiculous rant: “Labour’s cult of factionalism is going into overdrive. Emma Dent Coad is the latest scalp.”

Speaking to the Communist Morning Star, a Momentum spokesperson added:

“It is a travesty of justice that passionate, popular advocates for their community like Emma are being blocked en-masse by Keir Starmer’s Labour on spurious grounds, so loyalists from outside the area can be parachuted in.”

“This is a deeply damaging episode for the Labour Party in Kensington, and one that local people are unlikely to forget.”

Instead now, if Labour actually want to make headway given Rishi Sunak somewhat steadying the Conservatives in just a few days in office, it is time that the party woke up and smelt the markets. The days of trade unionism and Jeremy Corbyn are dead; Britain needs a centrist opposition that genuinely opposes, but one that actually works with business rather than supports strikes against it.

Pictured top: Jeremy Corbyn apologist Owen Jones and Emma ‘Dense’ Dent Coad – a footnote in history who (along with Jones) has blocked ‘The Steeple Times’ on Twitter; here is a woman who plainly cannot cope with any discussion where she’s not hectoring all others.

Here is a privileged Kensington resident – who was married to Sir Hadley Gregory D’Oyly, 15th Baronet from 1978 to 1972 – who likes to play the card that she’s a woman of the people. She’s incapable of dialogue with anyone who doesn’t totally agree with her and simply blocks that dares question her on Twitter.

The far-left, Corbynite socialist councilor for the Globorne ward of the Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Council since 2006 is proud to be trade union backed and also has a book just out that she clearly wants to promote and profiteer from.

Dent Coad’s statement in full:

I am devastated that the Labour Party has blocked me from standing to once again represent my community in Parliament, the community I have spent the last 20 years of my life fighting for.

At the same time, I am angry that local members and our local community in Kensington have been denied the opportunity to vote in a free and fair contest, which has been sacrificed for the sake of factional intrigue from Labour officials.

This campaign has never been about me. I stood to offer dedicated representation for the people of Kensington in Parliament, from someone who knows and cares for our communities.

From my role as a local councillor and Labour Group leader, to my campaigning efforts as Kensington’s MP on housing issues so dear to our hearts, I have only ever sought the chance to champion our people, whose voices all too often go unheard.

If I have been outspoken in my politics, it is due to my passion and care for Kensington – for my neighbours and friends – and because of my burning desire to stamp out injustice and build a fairer, more equal society.

Upsettingly, unaccountable Labour officials have exploited this outspokenness to unjustly prevent me from standing for the seat I won just five years ago, the seat I came agonisingly close to holding even in 2019, despite the trade union backing which should have seen me longlisted automatically.

It is plain as day that the candidate selection process now being run by the Party is being factionally abused and is not fit for purpose.

I deplore injustice, and through my 16 years on the Council, various reports and my recent book, ‘One Kensington’ I have done my utmost not only to draw attention to the very real inequalities in our community but to actively fight it, from the council chamber to the House of Commons.

Above all, my driving ambition has been to combat the inequality which scars our community, the systematic disregard for working-class people which led to the atrocity of the Grenfell Tower fire, and which has led many to lose faith with the political process.

These people deserve and need representation in Parliament. I hope that Labour’s eventual candidate will gain the respect and trust of all communities in Kensington. It won’t be easy.

Solidarity,

Emma

The ex-Labour MP for Kensington’s full statement. It clearly illustrates her lack of respect for democracy and how she is instead totally unfit to be a Member of Parliament again. In October 2019 whilst still an MP, she was forced to apologise after liking a Facebook post that claimed: Israel “disgraces all of us Jews worldwide,” according to the ‘Jewish News.’

October 27, 2022
Loopy Liz Panned By Poem – Liz Truss Poetry
As Liz Truss continues to gain the support of further Tory members, her supporters make a fool of her in verse in penning poetry referencing her as ‘Bizzy Lizzy’ and ‘Thatcher Mach 3’

Supporters laud her as ‘Lioness Liz’ whilst unsurprisingly detractors unsurprisingly label her ‘Ludicrous Liz’ and ‘Loopy Liz,’ but now after the former published two poems about her, Liz Truss MP has become a bit of a laughing stock.

Written in a manner that would make even the ‘Queen of Doggerel’ Pam Ayres embarrassed by someone of unknown identity and a Londoner going by the name of Bill Sutton, the poetry (featured below unedited) is illustrative only that the MP for South West Norfolk’s fan club are incapable of grammar, spelling, sense and logic.

Peppered with hatred for the man they view to be the “back-stabber” (though they reference him as a “back stabbee” and “snake”) Rishi Sunak, the poems express also loathing for the “woke” and admiration for Margaret Thatcher (whose surname is put down as “Thartcher”). All criticism is then subsequently described as the “mock and snicker” of “lefties.”

With backing like this flocking to the cause of the likely next Prime Minister, God help once Great Britain. Could this Oxford educated PPE graduate, ex-Liberal Democrat, pro-abolitionist of the monarchy and ex-Remainer not find anyone intelligent to pen a verse about her?

Pictured top – In 2021, as International Trade Secretary, the now wannabe ‘Fat Controller’ visited Derbyshire train-makers Alstom Derby; she was mocked for “enjoying a day out at Thomas The Tank Engine World” in altered imagery.

The aforementioned verses truly are beyond cringeworthy. If this is the best kind of supporters the Conservative Party can muster, surely greats like Sir Winston Churchill would turn in their graves.

Bill Sutton thinks his favoured candidate “normal” and someone capable who is “all about being kind to each other and not mocking” (though his spelling of such leaves much to be desired).

The first ‘poem’ in full (unedited and peppered with errors):

Untitled and shared by someone on Facebook’s ‘Angry People in Local Newspapers,’ this shocker was mocked by over 1,000 group members.

Of it and its author, remarks included:
- “Jesus wept, the gin in that.”
- “I want to hear more about her army of Brians.”
- “Brian isn’t thrilled about matching her face.”
- “And they say right wing comedy is dead.”
- “These people actually vote.”
- “No irony they couldn’t spell brains right when talking about her.”
- “Daft bigoted melt.”
- “Back stabbee would mean he was the one stabbed in the back, NOT the one doing the stabbing.”
- “Clearly wrote this just before his medication was kicking in.”
- “Has anyone checked if this person is having a stroke?”
- “I’ve never written poetry whilst falling down some stairs before. Good effort.”
- “This has to be a Poe.”
- “Keats, Thomas, Amis; Step aside… We have found our Laureate.”
- “It’s like watching a descent into mental instability in real time.”
- “If this is satire, it’s genius. If it’s real, it’s frightening as f*ck.”
- “MRS THARTCHER and getting rid of THE WOKE. Possibly the best poem I have ever read.”
‘Untitled’

Bizzy lizzy will win by a.mile

She has a got a lovely smile

Brians to match her lovely face.

She will win this pm race

Sunaks a snake

A back stabbee he is

He turned on boris

And will turn on liz

She will be a great pm

Not as good.as Maggie but no one could

be

Mrs thartcher mach 3

Liz will stand proud over our lands

Holdinh out both her hand

If we wotk to gether we can

Get of the woke

And them. Cry into there

cornflakes

As liz makes our country great.

In liz we trust god speed to our new pm

The second ‘poem’ in full (also unedited and peppered with errors):

Penned by a Londoner named Bill Sutton who commented: “So I have writ [sic] this about liz.please don’t mock my soelling [sic] like the leftys [sic] do.thank you.hope you all like it.”

Comments included: “I wish you had spell checked your poem before putting it up” and “about as good [at] spelling as Truss.” Mr Sutton responded: “Alright lefty” whilst someone named Sheila Williams added: “Bloody lefty grammar police.”

‘Liz’

Liz is the one.to make things right

She shines bright like a lovley light

She is a lady with lot of class

She is a women and is.a badass

She will put sunak in his place

We all know hes a waist of space

Maggies would love to see her win

And she.would put sunak in.the bin

Cone on liz you can win this

Dont let them bully you like snakes who.hiss.

We support our lovley liz

Liz for pm liz for pm liz for om

Meanwhile other super fans of the Oxford born 47-year-old heir apparent to Boris Johnson have ludicrously been suggesting that a conspiracy is being organised by supporters of Rishi Sunak and the introduction of foreign members from India to boost his vote.

Worse still, this birdbrained flip-flopper – who has been married to an accountant named Hugh O’Leary since 2000 but who had an extra-marital affair with the then also married now ex-MP Mark Field – has acquired the backing of Ben Wallace MP. He has remarked: “She’s honest. She’s authentic. She’s experienced.”
August 17, 2022
The New Porn Parish Of RBKC – “Explicit Gay Porn” Actor Lloyd North Becomes Conservative Councillor
EXCLUSIVE – Matthew Steeples suggests the biggest story about last night’s local elections has been missed – the Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea now has a one-time “explicit gay porn” actor as a councillor, whether he is into “tractor porn” like ex-MP Neil Parish is unknown but today we condemn also his decision to share imagery of knives
- Former “explicit gay porn” actor Lloyd North was elected as a Conservative councillor in the ritzy Royal Borough of Kensington And Chelsea last night with 995 votes.
- Mr North supposedly previously ran a bizarre fansite dedicated to Margaret Thatcher on Facebook where he posted pictures of someone, apparently himself, mocked up as his idol.
- The clearly once sexually saucy new councillor has also shockingly shared imagery on Facebook of a figure posing with a noose and a carving knife accompanied by the creepy caption “be afraid, be kinda afraid.”
- There have been 87 victims of knife injuries in RBKC under the age of 25 in the past 3 years.
- Anything but ‘conservative’ RBKC Conservatives also recently appointed an Estonian convict who has been a ‘Playboy’ cover girl, Anna-Maria Galojan, to the committee of the ward Mr North has been elected to serve.
Whilst, for the Conservatives, the most cataclysmic cacophonies of chaos of the local elections 2022 came last night in the form of the loss of the “blue rinse” flagship councils of Wandsworth and Westminster – most famous as the setting of the scandal of the now ex-Dame Shirley Porter’s gerrymandering in the 1980s – the mainstream media have missed a far more saucy and sexually charged Tory story from the night.

Featured in everywhere from The Times to the crusading local blogs From The Hornets Nest (FTHN) and This Is North Kensington (THINK) when his candidacy for the Conservative Party was announced, a clearly anything but ‘conservative’ in his past ‘extra-curricular’ activities chap named Lloyd Lewis North – porn name: ‘Warren Lord’ – secured 995 votes in the Campden Ward in the Tory stronghold that is The Royal Borough of Kensington And Chelsea and was thus elected as one of fifty of the local authority’s councillors.

Described by John Reynolds in The Times in March 2018 as having once “appeared in a string of explicit gay porn films and participated in International Mr Leather, one of the world’s biggest fetish events,” Mr North – who the paper added “is thought to have retired from the porn industry” – joins Lady ‘Call Me Catherine’ Faulks and someone named Preety Manhar Pancholi Hudd as one of the ritzy area’s representatives.

Whether Mr North shared his past career ‘highlights’ with the buffers of Kensington whilst campaigning remains unknown. However, with Neil Parish now gone as an MP after watching ‘tractor porn’ on his mobile device in the House of Commons Chamber, we’d most definitely suggest that his Tory colleagues should be sure not to be Googling ‘Warren Lord’ whilst in session at Kensington Town Hall in Hornton Street, W8.

Elsewhere, in a post on Facebook, shared on 31^st October 2013, Mr North – who has worked as British Airways steward, according to FTHN and posed in an outfit where he displayed a “passing resemblance to Baroness Thatcher” also – offered up a photograph of a person with a noose around their neck brandishing a very large carving knife. “Happy Halloween – ‘Boo’ – at Wolverton Gatehouse” he boomed. Asked by someone named Jimmy Bramlett: “Aren’t you gonna [sic] wear a costume?” the now The Royal Borough of Kensington And Chelsea Conservative councillor for the Campden Ward responded: “Be afraid, be kinda [sic] afraid.”

A 2022 report by the very local authority Lloyd North now sits as a councillor for revealed that “in the last 3 years there have been 87 victims of knife injuries in RBKC under the age of 25” and that “knife crime with injury offences have been increasing year on year in RBKC.” In 2021 alone, “there were 11 teenagers that were known to be a victim of a stabbing in RBKC.”

It is most certainly now time for Councillor North to consider whether sharing such a photograph on a publicly viewable social media site – and one that is mostly used by millennials – is an appropriate act for someone whose work will now include dealing with the impact of knife crime in the Campden Ward.

Pictured top – Now former Conservative Member of Parliament for Tiverton and Honiton (2010 – 2022) and former Conservative Member of the European Parliament for South West England (1999 – 2009) Neil Quentin Gordon Parish wrecked his career by watching porn in the House of Commons and getting caught (left), he claimed to be looking for “Dominator tractors” but ended up instead it seems with “dominatrices” (pictured left); “explicit gay porn actor” Lloyd North, one of three councillors for the Campden Ward of The Royal Borough of Kensington And Chelsea since 5^th May 2022 (pictured right).

The now distinctive tattoo of Councillor Lloyd Lewis North (pictured also left campaigning complete with a blue rosette for the Conservatives in The Royal Borough of Kensington And Chelsea) is clearly displayed in both his ‘adult’ shot and a more innocent ‘holiday photo.’

Mr North – whose “former partner, Ben Grey, was an adult film star who died in 2007 after injecting crystal meth and suffocating himself” according to ‘The Times’ – presents himself in a much more ‘conservative’ fashion in photographs shared on his Facebook page.

In a post on Facebook, shared on 31st October 2013, Lloyd Lewis North offered up a photograph of a person with a noose around their neck brandishing a very large carving knife. Frankly, for someone who has sought high office and is a member of the Conservative Party, one has to ask: “Is that appropriate?”

Most photographs on the new Tory councillor’s Facebook page feature more ‘conservative’ moments of his life – amongst them, this image of him on 24th April 2013 posing with a cardboard cutout of Queen Elizabeth II.

In May 2011, ‘From The Hornets Nest’ reported that Lloyd North had been selected as a candidate for the Conservatives in the Brompton Ward of RBKC. The blog shared also that the “ardent fan of former PM and Chelsea resident Maggie Thatcher” had “started his own Facebook fan page” devoted to her. That page is now defunct it seems, but ‘FTHN’ also revealed there was a “mock up picture of a character from ‘Little Britain,’ with Hornet believes is Mr North’s features superimposed onto the photo. Quite what this has to do with the Iron Lady is anyones guess, but expect it is supposed to show a passing resemblence to Baroness Thatcher – how this rather disrespectful approach squares with the supposed fan base is another thing.”

Whether Neil Parish’s ‘tractor porn’ involved gay or straight individuals is unknown. Whether he has watched fellow Tory Lloyd North’s ‘works’ ever is also unknown.

The now former MP and former MEP has been unsurprisingly widely mocked on social media. Of him whilst sharing a picture of Parish’s farm and a tractor located there, journalist Lewis Clarke remarked: “I’m not remotely turned on it by myself, but each to their own I suppose.” Whether the new councillor for Campden Ward, Kensington’s porn ‘works’ will be turning on or alternatively scandalising anyone in the council chambers of RBKC remains yet to be seen.

He was looking for tractors but ended up with porn actors? 🚜

Neil Parish must think you were all born yesterday.

Boris Johnson’s Conservatives are a national embarrassment.pic.twitter.com/wm3ijan21s
— Angela Rayner (@AngelaRayner) April 30, 2022

Of the now former Tiverton and Honiton MP, Labour MP Angela Rayner – herself known for joking about her own ‘Sharon Stone moment’ in Parliament and then bleating and blubbing that those that repeated such were sexists – tweeted: “He was looking for tractors but ended up with porn actors? Neil Parish must think you were all born yesterday.”

Last night’s big local elections 2022 shock came in the form of the Tories losing not only Wandsworth but also Westminster. The last time the party got a genuine shock there was after the scandal of the then Dame Shirley Porter being surcharged for gerrymandering as part of the “homes for votes scandal.”

Further shock might come in the Royal Borough of Kensington And Chelsea if an Estonian ex-convict and ‘Playboy’ cover girl named Anna-Maria Gaoljan joins ex-porn actor Lloyd ‘Mr Leather’ North on the council. As was reported in ‘The Steeple Times’ in late April, Miss Galojan – who has been snapped with everyone from Boris Johnson to Prince Michael of Kent – was recently appointed to the committee of Campden Ward Conservatives and thus became the second “saucy” sort to hold a position in the party in that locality. Pwoah!
May 6, 2022
Carrie Antoinette, The Cardinal & The Binned Abba Dancing Spad

Whilst Cardinal (John) Henry Newman got made a saint, Carrie Johnson’s Abba dancing buddy Henry Newman has been binned and turfed out with the rubbish

Oxford University educated Cardinal John Henry Newman was canonised as a saint in the Catholic Church in October 2019. Meanwhile earlier that year, his namesake, a spad of plainer birth but of the same alma mater, “discretely charmed by the bourgeoisie” Henry John Newman, got himself elevated when his Abba dancing partner, Carrie Johnson, got her clammering claws on the keys to the nation’s second most famous home, 10 Downing Street.

Now, whilst supposedly “sublimated homosexual” Saint John Henry Newman C.O. – despite having being dead for 132 years – is considered a “national treasure” and described as “the first English saint of the modern era” according to The Tablet, his openly gay namesake was this weekend turfed out of Downing Street with the rubbish.

Gone for Brexiteer ‘Bin Boy’ Henry Newman – who was bizarrely photographed pointing at bags of refuse in Camden in 2017 whilst standing to become a councillor – will be the days of quaffing booze on the terrace of the half acre garden behind the official residences of the Prime Minister and the Chancellor of the Exchequer. Now, instead, this graduate also of equally fabled institutions including Harvard and the London School of Economics, will have to pleasure himself with a pint in a pub in The Marquis of Granby after days working in the less salubrious surrounds of Marsham Street back with his supposed sometime flatmate Michael Gove.

According to the Daily Mail’s Andrew Pierce this morning, Newman was so important to Carrie Johnson that the Prime Minister allowed him to celebrate his 38^th birthday last summer – hardly a milestone of any note – with a lavish bash at Chequers, the grace-and-favour residence intended for entertaining visiting statesmen and international dignitaries.

“It turned out to be a very high-spirited affair,” Pierce reported, with “Housing Secretary Michael Gove riding pillion as Boris Johnson took him on a joy-ride on his second-hand Yamaha motorcycle around the grounds. Gove clasped his hands around Boris’s ample waist as they nudged speeds of 55mph, while Newman – clutching a flute of champagne – laughed and cheered.”

Gone now are such privileges and gone also is Newman’s desk close to Boris Johnson’s study and instead this alleged “Chatty Rat” – if we are to believe Dominic Cummings – “has been banished to work with his former mentor Gove at his departmental HQ a 15-minute walk away in Marsham Street.” This once influential spad – whom once suggested on Facebook: “[What I’m] thinking [is that] this country needs is a new taskforce” – it appears, has been disposed just like a binbag full of stinking, rotten fish.

For Newman, this downgrade will no doubt seem heartless and unfair, but, as Pierce added: “It was [his] intimate relationship with Mrs Johnson that has proved his undoing.” He now faces likely criticism into what went on with ‘Partygate’ in Sue Gray’s report and as the journalist concluded: “There will be fewer cosy chats in the Downing Street flat in the future.”

Elsewhere, in a ‘Comment’ piece this morning, The Sun declared: “Only time will tell if the ‘greased piglet’ [Boris Johnson’ left it too late to escape” slaughter by his very own party. They neglected to remark on how it will continue to go from bad to worse for his spendaholic, power crazed wife ‘Carrie Antoinette’ now that she’s lost “her rock” and equivalent of Paul Burrell to the late Diana, Princess of Wales.

A fan of wearing beanie hats that declare: “Let’s get Brexit done,” here is a young man who taught politics at the School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS), after studying at the University of Oxford, Harvard University and the London School of Economics. Henry Newman reportedly then “cut his teeth” working in the Cabinet Office during the coalition government years and then joined Michael Gove’s entourage in the Ministry of Justice after he was appointed as the Lord Chancellor in 2015.

Aside from having travelled to Russia in his youth, Henry Newman joined the Vote Leave campaign during the 2016 referendum campaign and, according to ‘The Telegraph’ “was among a close circle of Mr Gove’s friends who were said to have helped to convince him to ‘knife’ Mr Johnson and torpedo his bid for the Tory leadership by deciding to run himself.” Later, a director of the pro-Brexit Open Europe think-tank, Newman was then rewarded for being “loyal” to his wine chucking bestie Carrie Symonds when Boris Johnson came to power.

‘Bin Boy’ Henry Newman’s words of wisdom on Facebook…

“Is drunk.”

“Is opening an organic box.”

“Is discreetly charmed by the bourgeoisie.”

“Is drowning in honey, stingless.”

“Once you kill a cow you gotta make a burger.”

“Wondering if he is really a top concern for US immigration.”

“Waiting for Jacqui Smith to resign.”

“Is dancing, dancing, dancing… Is listening to rumba in W. Hartford… Is dancing in the dark… Is missing dancing.”

“Is listening to the Stones while the economy collapses.”

“Is watching his tan fall off.”

“Hates people who don’t know how to use a rowing machine.”

“Is thinking what this country needs is a new taskforce.”

Descriptions of Henry Newman by…

Boris Johnson:

“One of my three musketeers.”

Carrie Symonds:

“One of my four favourite people.”

Toby Young:

“He is a new role model… If you were a [politics show] booker who had to find someone… Newman was the only name on your Rolodex.”

“As the oxygen went out of Theresa May’s premiership, and her withdrawal agreement began to breathe its last, the great balloon of his career became more and more inflated.”

Dominic Cummings:

“All the evidence [regarding the second lockdown leak] definitely leads to Henry Newman… I’m just trying to get the communications data to prove it.”

An unnamed “senior government source”:

“The allegations against Henry Newman are entirely false. He wouldn’t be working in Downing Street if he was suspected of leaking information.”

An unnamed “Downing Street insider” to The Mail on Sunday:

“This is the man who did more than anyone to encourage Michael [Gove] to stab Boris in the back.”

“But he’s used his relationship with Carrie to ingratiate himself back into the inner circle. He’s always up in the flat with her, and that gives him direct access to the PM. The rest of the No. 10 team have no idea what he’s saying to him. And that’s the root cause of a lot of this.”

Andrew Pierce:

“The leader of the Carrie clique at No. 10.”

“The leader of the liberal camp in No. 10.”

Follow Henry Newman on his now somewhat secretive social media (if he lets you) at @henryjohnnewman on Facebook, @henryjohnnewman on Instagram and @HenryNewman on Twitter.

Newman’s childish Facebook posts are not indicative of someone of academic note and his rise through government should be questioned as a result. Did he get there because of merit or simply because he was a ‘FOC’ (‘Friend of Carrie’)? The answer seems very, very clear.

Henry Newman, like fellow mouthy sorts such as Diane Abbott, Jay Beecher and Owen Jones, likes to pontificate and peddle, but when called out, he simply hits the block button. Hardly the actions of someone who would like to think himself an able debater at the Oxford Union and more those of someone ‘trained’ by the wine chucking harpy Carrie Johnson.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tCZdFOBQM-w&feature=emb_imp_woyt

February 7, 2022