Matthew Steeples suggests Jeffrey Epstein treated Ghislaine Maxwell like a “mother figure”
With unnamed commentators telling The Sun that Jeffrey Epstein was “initially funded by [the] tycoon Robert Maxwell” rather than, as has been generally suggested, Leslie Wexner, his relationship with the all-round figure of grubby ghastliness Ghislaine Maxwell begins to make a hell of a lot more sense.
Mucky madam Maxwell rather reminds me of a woman I know with an equally vast address book. This childless individual, known for stalking parties collecting business cards, has a devotion to her boss that is quite beyond putrid in its obviousness. She fawns on this frankly vile man as if he’s a God and one can see ‘Bouncing Bob’s’ bitch of a daughter treated evil Epstein in the very same manner.
With the woman I know, the ‘love’ goes completely unrequited and he, in fact, just treats her as the ultimate skivvy. With Ghislaine Maxwell, it was likely just the same with the one-time teacher turned megalomaniac utilising her clear ability to inveigle her way through society to further his deviant desires.
Jeffrey Epstein, however, plainly found ‘Mother Maxwell’ a dull lover and that is why their relationship, just like with the aforementioned Londoner I mention, never moved to marriage. Here, instead, was a woman whom this monster viewed to be the mother he never had.
Elsewhere on Twitter, “sex slave survivor” Kirby Sommers this morning tweeted: “Ghislaine worked for her father at his flagship paper The Daily Mirror, and was disliked by the employees for her “insufferable arrogance.” One of her father’s former secretaries complained: “She’d ask for a cigarette and walk off with the packet.”
Mother Maxwell – Ghislaine Maxwell treated both her father and Jeffrey Epstein as if they were God-like figures in her life. They respectively actually treated her like dirt, but that didn’t stop her worshiping these mendacious megalomaniacs.
All-round plonker Phillip Schofield’s wine range condemned as “only fit for the bin” and “no more palatable than fizzy Ribena”
Known for his extremely short fuse and once described by David Dimbleby as “cretinous,” Phillip Schofield recently launched a wine range in Waitrose and on Amazon. Unsurprisingly, it’s been a total flop and was quite deservedly condemned at the weekend in The Sun as “overpriced” and “bitter.”
Priced between £19.99 and £24.99 for 2.25-litre boxes, Schofield’s was slammed by one punter as “only fit for the bin” on Waitrose’s website. They added: “The wine [was] effervescing within the bag. No more palatable than fizzy Ribena” whilst another suggested: “I don’t have anything positive to say about the flavour at all. Not pleasant drinking. We failed to finish the box.”
Prior to launching the range in April, Schofield quite pompously bragged to The Drinks Business:
“When I agreed to this partnership, I had certain conditions; I wanted to be part of the tasting team… I wanted it to be good value. The result is something I felt I could really invest in.”
Schofield – whose ‘coming out’ and alleged connections to a young man named Matthew McGreevy attracted much media attention earlier this year – unsurprisingly failed to respond to a request from The Steeple Times for comment; he was probably instead too busy nursing a hangover headache from drinking his equivalent of Sir Cliff Richard’s equally vile plonk.
Pictured top: All-round plonker Phillip Schofield on a night out with his one-time ‘friend’ Matt McGreevy; Phillip Schofield’s bag-in-box wines.
Sir Cliff Richard’s associations with wines, just like Phillip Schofield’s, have not always proved fruitful. In 2006, appearing on Gordon Ramsay’s ‘The F-Word,’ the crappy crooner had a meltdown during a blind tasting. After sipping one unnamed offering, Sir Cliff announced: “That’s rubbish. I wouldn’t pay for that. It’s tainted, it’s insipid, it tastes like vinaigrette. I’d never buy that.” Ramsay, responded by remarking: “Cliff, that’s your wine”. The singer is said to have answered: “Young man, go f**k yourself.”What a Plonker – Phillip Schofield was photographed with Matthew McGreevy on a number of occasions during the latter’s youth.What a Plonker – The television presenter with his “friend” at a later date.
As Britain likely moves into further lockdowns, drug dealers are changing the way they operate and communicate; they now bizarrely demand customers ask: “Is now a good time?”
IS NOW A GOOD TIME? – In June, Misha Glenny – the author of McMafia and a fellow at the Berggruen Institute – penned a fascinating article for the Guardian about how organised crime has had to adapt due to coronavirus lockdown restrictions.
Glenny highlighted how it was “too risky for [drug] dealers to move around” in cities like London and how prices had risen as a result. He rather over generously suggested “criminals are humans too” and were “abiding by the rules [of lockdown],” but also pointed out that the growth in online crime had been accelerated by COVID-19.
In a series of WhatsApp messages seen recently by The Steeple Times between a reader who works in the financial services sector and a London based drug peddler, the way in which such people have changed the way they communicate with their “customers” was fascinatingly illustrated.
We share said criminal’s messages below and highlight how he now uses that devoid of utterly anything phrase “reaching out” to communicate with his customers via all means other than Sim phone calls and SMS messages. He begins:
I hope this message finds you well. Just reaching out to inform you that I have changed my number from (old number: +44XXXXXXXXX) to (new number: +44XXXXXXXXXXX). Please save new number as old one will soon be inactive. Please make contact on WhatsApp/Telegram/Signal only (no Sim phone calls or SMS messages please). And as always, when referring my services to friends/colleagues/family, please call/message me in advance to inform me that you have done or intend to do so. Please also kindly forward me their contact details. Apologies if you have already received this message from my previous broadcast. Thanks.
In a further message, said individual laid his “is now a good time?” message on thick and continued:
Thank you for using my service and thank you for your valued custom. Moving forward I want to lay out my terms and conditions. In order for you to receive the best service and customer care it is advisable that you abide by them. They are as follows:
I will be your main point of contact for any disputes/feedback.
When contacting me please remember to use WhatsApp only (unless I advise otherwise).
Please message only and don’t call unless I ask you to you to (very important).
The first message you send should always be “is now a good time?”
Don’t engage in further contact until you have had a response to the first message. This is for your safety.
If I am unavailable you will receive a message with clear instructions to follow. Please follow them.
I won’t allways [sic] be available to meet you in person, and in this event you will be allocated an alternative driver. However I cannot guarantee you will be allocated the same driver every occasion I am unavailable.
You will be able to request a particular driver if they are available.
Contact the driver through WhatsApp only, with the first message being “is now a good time?”
All drivers carry the same stock.
All of my products have a distinctive packaging/branding.
If product presentation/quality is not up to standard it means that it has probably been tampered with and in which case you should report back to me immediately.
Allways [sic] make your order clear to the driver and have cash ready before they depart.
When referring my services to friends/colleagues/family, please message me in advance to inform me that you have done or intend to do so. Please also kindly forward me their contact details. And remember to tell them to use WhatsApp only using the phrase “is now a good time?”
And last but not least, always treat the driver with the same respect you would expect to have reciprocated.
Once again thank you for your business and I look forward to hearing from you in the future.
Our typically middle class reader – someone astonishingly typical of the majority using cocaine in Britain and a member of a social group where abuse of this substance is more common than alcoholism – sensibly wrote back: “Now is NOT a good time” and ended the dialogue. Sadly, many others will act to the contrary and that’s what will keep this vile piece of toerag in business now and “allways” [sic].
Misha Glenny’s 2008 non-fiction book ‘McMafia: A Journey Through the Global Criminal Underworld’ inspired the brilliant eight-chapter, 2018 BBC One series of the same name. A second eight-chapter series is due to be aired in due course.
Change.org petition launched to demand the evil sex toy-shover-up-the-bums-of-sheep Larysa Switlyk be banned from Instagram
Given the angry reaction to our story on Friday about Larysa Switlyk from our readers, we have now started a Change.org petition calling on Instagram to at the very least remove this Trump supporting endangered animal slayer’s ‘blue tick’ and a the very best, ban her altogether from the medium.
Posting a petition to the Change.org site about the hunting world’s equivalent of Katie Hopkins, Matthew Steeples remarked:
Animal massacrer Larysa Switylk has a blue tick on Instagram in spite of the fact she has:
Posted pictures of herself with the bodies of endangered spieces she has killed such as mountain goats and Coke’s hartebeests. She posts these images to Instagram.
Has bragged about shooting a sheep in England and shoved a sex toy up its bum. She posted this toecurlingly sick image to the site.
Associated with other killers of amongst animals including alligators, peacocks, turkeys, elephants, lions and leopards such as Donald Trump’s sons and brags about what they kill. She has no respect for her victims and posts pictures of such to Instagram.
Larysa Switlyk’s content is offensive and her smugness about killing endangered creatures is morally reprehensible. It is unacceptable and should not be posted to a medium where it can be seen by hundreds of millions of people.
Larysa Switlyk should a) lose the blue tick she should never have been given by Instagram in the first place and secondly b) she should be banned from Instagram for posting offensive content.
Ban Larysa Switlyk from Instagram – That this vile woman enjoys shooting slow moving creatures like sheep about sums up her complete lack of a moral compass. Why do social media operators allow her to continue to share such imagery?
Massacring monster Larysa Switlyk boasts about killing an endangered Coke’s hartebeest and a wolf also; she shares such for personal profit and frankly Instagram should be ashamed of itself for enabling her
Barbaric bitch Switlyk’s image shockingly attracted over 2,600 likes in just 11 hours and comments such as “that’s cool!” and “you can make a necklace from his tusks,” but what should be remembered is this: The dumb-ass morons flocking to her page are then directed to a page selling ‘sheep yoga shorts’ and ‘baby one pieces.’ Larysa Switlyk, it can be argued, shares this on social media for one reason and one reason alone and that disgustingly is personal profit.
Please sign a Change.org petition calling on Instagram to ban Larysa Switlyk from their site and/or, at the very least, remove her blue tick. The content she posts is not acceptable for family audiences.
Larysa Switlyk’s post attracted over 2,616 likes on Instagram in just 11 hours from people plainly as mentally retarded as her. If the social media giant had any decency, they would ban this monster from their platform given the offensive content she posts. One has to ask: “Who in their right mind on Instagram’s board, for example, finds it acceptable to shove a sex toy up the arse of a dead sheep?”
As filmmaker Sean Stone suggests Ghislaine Maxwell could expose unpleasant truths for Hollywood, Virginia Giuffre scores another blow against the mucky madam
Asked during an interview last week: “What is up with Hollywood? Can it come back? Can it survive COVID-19?” by Russia Today America’sRick Sanchez, Oliver Stone’s son and fellow filmmaker, Sean, responded: “Can it survive Ghislaine Maxwell is the question, actually.”
He continued: “I still think there is a lot more that is going to come out here with this Ghislaine trial because remember who, all, has been on Jeffrey Epstein island. And there’s been more in terms of the private jets and there’s been more than Chris Tucker and Kevin Spacey and the Clintons. I think you are going to see other Hollywood icons involved… More than we imagine.”
“I don’t think it’s even about her spilling the beans. I think there is case and evidence that is being drawn up that is in conjunction with the investigation into her. A lot more will be exposed about Epstein and Epstein island. I am 100% positive on that. And the question is who will be involved, who will be implicated, who will talk.”
“Look, we haven’t seen the end of it. ‘Me Too’ was the beginning of this, we haven’t seen the end of it. So, COVID is a wonderful opportunity for everything to shut down and restructure, but I think there is a lot of concern in Hollywood across the board from the exposure on the Epstein thing.”
Elsewhere yesterday, Virginia Giuffre told the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan that “Ghislaine Maxwell’s desire for privacy failed to justify the continued sealing of a deposition that the British socialite has fought to keep out of the public eye” according to Byline.
Giuffre’s lawyers, Sigrid McCawley and David Boies, remarked: “Maxwell’s vague argument about privacy interests cannot justify total closure of the deposition materials [and overcome] the public’s presumption of access.”
Going further, of moaning Maxwell’s attempts to suggest she was getting “unfair pretrial publicity” and her belief that she will be place before “a tainted jury pool, especially in large metropolitan areas such as New York,” the lawyers added:
“The size and heterogeneity of such communities make it unlikely that even the most sensational case will become ‘a cause célèbre’ where the whole community becomes interested in all the morbid details.”
Still very much in their early stages, the unravelling of Miss Maxwell’s grubby activities has barely begun and now, as Sean Stone has rightly observed, there will be a lot of well-known people who’ll be resorting to the Donald Trump school of “good wishes.” It’ll be fascinating to watch them fall like dominoes.
Pictured top: Mendacious mucky madam Ghislaine Maxwell with the catty catwalk calamity Naomi Campbell at a party in New York in 2002.
Stoning the Mucky Madam – Oliver Stone’s son Sean has suggested Ghislaine Maxwell could do a lot of damage to the Hollywood elite as further details about her activities with the paedophile Jeffrey Epstein are revealed.Stoning the Mucky Madam – Ghislaine Maxwell even sat on thrones in Buckingham Palace with the Hollywood horror Kevin Spacey. Yesterday in Manhattan, actor Anthony Rapp and another man filed a lawsuit seeking unspecified damages against Spacey, accusing him of sexual assaults in the 1980s when they were teenagers.Ghislaine Maxwell’s Hollywood connections numbered the likes of the now jailed producer Harvey Weinstein. Here, she is pictured at a party for one of Prince Andrew’s daughters with that particular paedophile and her ex-lover and now deceased paedophile Jeffrey Epstein.No wonder she had an interest in the oceans – Miss Maxwell’s octopus-like tentacles have stretched far and wide and her address book included everyone from media moguls such as Rupert Murdoch (pictured) to aristocrats and actors.Prince Andrew – accused of abuse by the at-the-time underage Virginia Giuffre – is another associate who has much to fear from his long-time friend. Will she do the right thing and finally tell the truth about what he got upto on 10th March 2001 in her house at 44 Kinnerton Street, Belgravia, London SW1X 8ES? Somehow, that seems unlikely, but stranger things have indeed happened.
Sarah Ferguson – a woman whose non-sweating ex-husband counted a monster paedo as his friend – deservedly slammed as she announces she’s going to be going online to read ‘The Monster Who Came to Visit’
The ‘Duchess of Dim’ just cannot help herself: Fresh from having said “no comment” when asked if she’d paid back a £15,000 loan from the thankfully now croaked paedophile Jeffrey Epstein (the word “comment” was frankly superfluous), the live-in ex-wife of he-who-doesn’t-sweat will be reading The Monster Who Came to Visit on her YouTube channel Fergie & Friends today at 4pm.
Appropriately, in response to ‘Randy Andy’s’ somewhat stupid sidekick’s announcement, a Twitter account named ‘Prince & The Pervert Podcast’ remarked:
“Ohhh I know this story!”
“It’s set in a London terrace owned by your mate #GhislaineMaxwell and #Epstein was there and a girl child. They went to Tramp nightclub and then went back to the terrace, a monster #PrinceAndre came back with them!”
“I guessed right didn’t I!”
Thick skinned or just plain thick as pig sh*t, Sarah Ferguson should now just do one thing: Shut up before the monster Maxwell comes back to bite her in the bum.
Sarah Ferguson’s decision to tweet about her forthcoming reading of ‘The Monster Who Came to Visit’ on ‘Fergie & Friends’ was deservedly met with derision.
Sarah Ferguson has a habit of making an utter berk of herself when she puts herself in front of any camera.
44 Kinnerton Street, Belgravia, London SW1X 8ES is the terraced house belonging to Ghislaine Maxwell which the ‘Prince & The Pervert Podcast’ references. It was here on 10th March 2001 that Prince Andrew allegedly had sex with Virginia Giuffre; a claim that the royal continues to deny.
Conservative MP for Kensington Felicity ‘Flicka’ Buchan should be utterly ashamed of herself for voting against safety measures to prevent another Grenfell Tower disaster
Last night, the Conservative Party disgracefully led the way to beat the Fire Safety Bill in the House of Commons by a margin of 318 to 188.
Most surprisingly, leading the way against a proposed piece of legislation that would have put the “official fire safety recommendations made during phase of the Grenfell inquiry put into law” was Felicity Buchan MP – whose Kensington constituency includes the very same tower where 72 people died and 74 others were hospitalised as a result of a catastrophic fire exacerbated by flammable cladding.
Summed up best last night by Evolve Politics, the perfectly sensible recommendations rejected by Buchan (‘Flicka’ to her friends) – a woman who previously said “up yours” to her 69% remain voting constituents – and her colleagues included:
Creating national guidelines for carrying out partial or total evacuations of high-rise buildings during emergencies.
Urgent inspections of fire doors contained in all multi-residential buildings.
A legal requirement for the owners or managers of multi-residential buildings to check fire doors at least every three months to ensure they are working effectively.
A legal requirement for the owners or managers of high-rise buildings to provide details of external walls and the materials used to the local fire service, and inform them of any changes.
A legal requirement for the owners or managers of high-rise buildings to provide paper and electronic versions of building plans to local fire services.
A legal requirement to ensure all high-rise buildings have a premises information box which includes a copy of floor plans.
Regular inspections of lifts required for use by firefighters and the mechanism that allows them to take control of it.
The Steeple Times contacted Miss Buchan for comment via Twitter early Tuesday. Tellingly, ‘Flicka’ has yet to respond as to why she failed to support measures that – if they had been in place on 14th June 2017 – could most definitely have saved her constituents’ lives.
Flicka-ing off the Safety – Twitter users unsurprisingly rounded on Felicity Buchan and her Conservative colleagues over the outcome of the vote.Flicka-ing off the Safety – Nick Thomas-Symonds MP described ‘Flicka’s’ decision to vote against the recommendations as “appalling” and suggested: “Many of her constituents will feel let down and have serious questions to ask.”Flicka-ing off the Safety – Another Twitter user named Nile pointed out her behaviour was that “of a sociopath.”
Alleged shoplifter and husband of pisshead Richard Madeley has proven himself delusional in declaring himself an expert on coronavirus
Whilst the government’s handling of the coronavirus pandemic can most definitely be summed up as incompetent, that the ‘Dorian Gray of daytime telly’ Richard Madeley has now made himself out to be an expert on the matter this morning in the Express is beyond laughable.
Previously known for having disgracefully insulted someone with autism and branded “sexist” by his potbellied pisshead wife Judy Finnigan in February, Madeley boldly declared “we are being duped” over the death rate and argued that “lockdown will come to be seen as one of the most catastrophic misjudgments a British government has ever made.”
Going further in Nostradamus-like fashion, this king of the ‘memory lapse’ when it came to helping himself to champagne in supermarkets concluded: “[They are trying to] put the fear of God into the public. A great reckoning is coming.”
In response, one Twitter user, Andrew Keates, rightly remarked: “I need to read Richard Madeley’s perspective on Covid-19 as much as needing to know Ann Widdecombe’s top 10 tips on how to be sexy.” He most definitely has a point.
Silly season stupidity sends Saddam Hussein being “sold” for $20 on Wish.com viral
In the ultimate example of silly season antics, Wish.com have placed Saddam Hussein for sale for $20 on their site.
Given the former dictator is brown bread, how this is possible is quite beyond comprehension but this morning, it was one of Twitter’s main trending items.
Of the story, one Dein Moore remarked: “Saddam Hussein being sold on wish for $20 is peak 2020, stop outdoing yourself please, I’ve had my fill” whilst another, Nathan Vickery, added: “Can’t believe the U.S. spent all that time going after Saddam Hussein when they could have ordered him off wish for $20.”
