The Steeple Times

Category: MeGain – Meghan Markle

  • The MeGain & Randy Show (Part II)

    The MeGain & Randy Show (Part II)

    Virginia Roberts Giuffre would be wrong to rely on the narcissistic, lying Duchess of Sussex in her case against Prince Andrew… A rerun of the ‘MeGain & Randy Show’ would benefit utterly nobody

    As we highlighted in January 2020 and again in March 2021, a question hangs over the Duchess of Sussex and it is: “Did the then Meghan Markle meet Prince Andrew before she met Prince Harry?” Put in another manner, one could ask: “Did this calculating American actress meet the ‘bestie’ of the since croaked paedophile Jeffrey Epstein before she met the pathetically wet ‘ginger drip’ she later went on to marry?”

     

    Whilst to some this might not seem hugely important, the devil is always in the detail and for long now, many have suggested that the Duke of Sussex’s self-serving wife has peddled nonsense about how she first came into contact with the royal family.

     

    Today, with David Boies, a lawyer for the Duke of York’s alleged abuser Virginia Roberts Giuffre, claiming he’ll be likely seeking to force the Duchess of Sussex to testify as part of Giuffre’s civil suit, it is important to recall some key details before assessing ‘MeGain’s’ suitability as a witness of any kind.

     

    For one, it has been suggested that the Suits ‘star’ was allegedly seen cavorting on a yacht with the Pizza Express lover years before she became the dominant half of the dodgy duo that is ‘Ginge and Cringe.’ Equally, the now in-exile duchess, has herself banged on about a ‘friendship’ with Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie prior to meeting-without-Googling Prince Harry. Of course, for that disgraceful Oprah interview, that narrative subsequently changed, but wouldn’t it just when multi-million dollar deals were landing at ‘MeGain’s’ feet?

     

    Of why he might depose the Duchess of Sussex, Boies yesterday told The Daily Beast:

     

    “One; she is in the U.S. so we have jurisdiction over her.”

     

    “Two; she is somebody who obviously, at least for a period of time, was a close associate of Prince Andrew and hence is in a position to perhaps have seen what he did, and perhaps if not to have seen what he did to have heard people talk about it.”

     

    “Because of her past association with him, she may very well have important knowledge, and will certainly have some knowledge.”

     

    “Three; she is somebody who we can count on to tell the truth. She checks all three boxes.”

     

    “Andrew will be forced to give evidence under oath [as part of that process]… He has no way of escaping that.”

     

    Mr Boies clearly is a man who hasn’t done a hell of a lot of research into the Duchess of Sussex’s previous “inconveniences” with the truth and he is someone who hasn’t considered her recent ticking off during her libel action against The Mail On Sunday – during which she had to apologise to the Appeal Court for “making misleading statements” about biography briefing notes for Omid Scobie’s tittle-tattling tome, Finding Freedom.

     

    Today, we suggest a piece of advice to both David Boies and Virginia Roberts Giuffre – Don’t go down the ‘MeGain & Randy’ hole; it’ll only end in a very sweaty disaster.

     

    Prince Andrew on a yacht
    Prince Andrew enjoyed frolicking with young ladies on yachts very much during the 2010s. He should have been advised to keep his top on.
    Meghan Markle on a yacht
    Meghan Markle also had a penchant for yachting in the 2010s.

    Why the Duchess of Sussex would NOT make a good witness:

    • In November 2021, the duchess was forced to apologise to the Appeal Court in London for making a misleading statement in her privacy case against The Mail on Sunday’s publishers.
    • Her very own father, Thomas, has called out her many untruths about him and others again, again and again.
    • Of her claiming having got married the day before she actually did, Mr Markle stated: “Lying about the archbishop? How can you say: ‘We’ve been married three days before we got married’? Her lies are so obvious, I don’t know why she says them.”
    • Her very own half-sister, Samantha, has called her out as a liar on multiple occasions also. It has been proven that the duchess’s claim that she hasn’t seen her sibling in over 20 years was proven untrue when a photo of the pair 13 years ago emerged.
    • Her very own half-brother, Thomas Jr., said of her: “I told Prince Harry, I think she’s going to ruin your life. She’s very shallow… She’s a phony, a bully, a jaded, shallow, conceited woman.”
    • The former Meghan Markle has been called out on multiple occasions for spinning stories against other members of the royal family, most especially the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge.
    • Staff who’ve worked for her have complained that she is a bully and investigations into this remain ongoing.
    • She is a known manipulator of the press and paparazzis and it has been claimed that she’ll “twist the truth” to get any headline she wants.
    • Questions remain as to how many times she’s actually been married in total. Some say twice, some say thrice.
    • “Would you trust this woman with a bargepole?” is something often asked of this money motivated minx.

     

  • What Meghan Wants, Meghan Gets (Or Doesn’t)

    What Meghan Wants, Meghan Gets (Or Doesn’t)

    Is the era of “what Meghan wants, Meghan gets” well and truly over for the demanding and devious Duchess of Sussex?

    It seems that the tawdry terror that is the Duchess of Sussex has finally completed her passage and morphed from the ‘Modern Day Mrs Simpson’ into the ‘Modern Day Marie Antoinette.’         

     

    Living in extreme luxury in her £11 million mansion in California and having raked in over £147 million from Netflix and Spotify, the greedy grabber whom forms one half of the dubious duo that is ‘Ginge’ and ‘Cringe’ stands accused of telling porkie pies to a court in London and was somewhat charitably dubbed “difficult to deal with” in Monday night’s BBC show The Princes and the Press.

     

    Slammed elsewhere in the French media with a “devastating backlash” that reference her as a liar and someone whose “mask has slipped,” the former Meghan Markle has also been shot down yet again by her very own father.

     

    Speaking after his daughter’s car-crash interview on The Ellen DeGeneres Show, Mr Markle raged:

     

    “It’s no way to behave. The whole thing was kind of embarrassing. It was certainly embarrassing for the royal family. It’s embarrassing for her as well. I suspect it embarrassed everyone in the UK, too.”

     

    “She’s putting herself out there as a duchess but I’ve never seen a duchess behave this way, doing stupid stunts… I love my daughter but her performance was ridiculous.”

     

    “She insulted the queen, the royal family and the British people. She made a complete fool of herself and should lose her title.”

     

    Going further of ‘MeGain’s’ claims that a car she had owned in her youth didn’t have functioning doors, her father commented:

     

    “It was not a beat-up old car… The Ford Explorer she had in her early 20s that she mentioned was a good running vehicle. I don’t remember any time she had to crawl out of the back of it to get out, like she said. The doors worked fine on that vehicle until the day she got rid of it.”

     

    Referencing Amol Rajan’s BBC show, which continues on Wednesday 8th December, the Daily Mail’s Richard Kay yesterday asked: “Why did the BBC give airtime to Meghan’s mouthpieces?” and specifically quite rightly questioned why “the duchess’s lawyer [Jenny Afia] spoke to [Rajan] with Meghan’s permission.”

     

    In further observations, Kay questioned why the prattling PR peddler Omid Scobie was “amongst those given plenty of airtime” to say that “there were plenty of people who ‘felt [Meghan] needed to be put in her place.’” He added: “Why was this not properly challenged? More pertinently, Mr Scobie was not asked about his own relationship with the duchess.”

     

    In analysis elsewhere, speaking on GB News, royal commentator Andrew Eborn suggested that “Meghan’s appearance on The Ellen Show is part of a PR campaign” and added: “I can tell you here and now she will be wanting to enter politics in the states.”

     

    Instead of making such a move, the eternally power and privilege hungry Duchess of Sussex now ought to consider her position and recall the fate of Marie Antoinette. “Pardon me, sir, I did not do it on purpose” were the last words of the profligate, promiscuous French queen; “let them eat cake” – even if she never uttered such – is what she’ll be forever remembered for and ‘Murky Meg’ is well set for just the same epitaph.

     

    Why Meghan lied Paris Match November 2021
    ‘Paris Match’s’ latest cover featuring a photograph of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex in New York was accompanied by the headline: “Meghan: Why she lied, Harry betrayed by advisor.” The ‘Daily Express’ described the magazine’s coverage as being “scathing about the Sussexes” and added: “Paris-based British journalist Peter Allen claimed the magazine’s criticism of the Sussex royals is particularly significant because “the French media has been quite respectful towards them in the past.”
    Duchess of Sussex difficult 2
    What Meghan wants, Meghan gets – Previous documentaries have featured former royal staff who have stated of the demanding duchess: “We have had report after report from people who have witnessed unacceptable behaviour.”
    Duchess of Sussex difficult 1
    Other comments have included: “I am very concerned that the duchess was able to bully two PAs out of the household in the past year.”
  • Busy MeGain

    Busy MeGain

    Duchess of Sussex claims to be “too busy” to see the Queen at Christmas just as she’s advised to drop case against ‘Mail on Sunday’ after “forgetting” various email exchanges

    This morning the Daily Star reported that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex are “too busy” to see the Queen this Christmas.

     

    In an article by news reporter on podcasts Adam Goldsmith, the paper quoted royal author Stewart Pierce – whom stated: “Harry and Meghan won’t be able to [see the Queen at Sandringham] because of their own particular arrangements, because they’re very very busy with the next project – or the series of projects they’re involved in.”

     

    Clearly selfish to their core at a time when his grandmother is clearly suffering as a result of several health scares, decidedly drippy Prince Harry’s decision is probably, in fact, actually motivated by the fact that his “embarrassed by THAT letter” wicked wastrel wife simply can’t face returning to the United Kingdom.

     

    Elsewhere, yesterday, the iPaper ran an article by their arts and media correspondent Adam Sherwin. It was headlined: “Meghan Markle warned against taking Mail on Sunday privacy case to ‘high risk’ trial” and suggested legal experts have “warned that the Duchess of Sussex would be unwise to pursue her privacy case to a full trial which would require Meghan and other members of the royal family to face cross-examination.”

     

    After last week being forced to apologise to the Court of Appeal “for forgetting email exchanges in which authorised her press aide, Jason Knauf, to brief the authors of ‘unauthorised’ biography Finding Freedom,” murky ‘MeGain’ is now looking less and less credible as a witness.

     

    Speaking to the iPaper, “leading media lawyer” Mark Stevens remarked: “It’s high risk for her and she may be advised to seek an alternative outcome” whilst investigative journalist and “royal biographer” Tom Bower added: “If her case finally comes to trial in the High Court, Meghan will testify against her father and up to four former Palace officials. It would make sure the royal family is in her firing line.”

     

    Concluding, the iPaper tellingly added:

     

    “Royal sources told The Sunday Times that last week’s U-turn by the Duchess was just the ‘tip of the iceberg,’ with further claims that clash with her public statements likely to be aired.”

     

    “A palace aide said: ‘Perhaps this gives them the understanding of why the royals don’t like to get into court cases. It’s not like this wasn’t going to happen.’”

     

    Going further and released on YouTube on Sunday, Bower declared:

     

    “The duchess has tasted her own medicine… Markle’s sparkle is fading fast. The crash of Meghan’s credibility has been dramatic. Her integrity hangs on a thin thread.”

     

    “There will be many in Britain, not least amongst the royal family, who will smile with relief that the woman that hit them with accusations in the Oprah Winfrey interview is getting a taste of her own medicine.”

     

    “Not least amongst her many accusations on Oprah was her claim that no one in Buckingham Palace was willing to protect me and that they forced her to be silent.”

     

    “To me, much of the evidence now suggests palace officials worked overtime to protect and advise her. The saga of Meghan risks heading towards a downfall has some way to run, but this week saw the first cracks in the walls of secrecy she built over the past years to conceal her true nature.”

     

    “Catastrophic harm would be inflicted on those she deeply resents [if she goes to trial] – Charles, William and Kate. The drama probably best described as ‘a tragedy’ started on her wedding day.”

     

    “Stricken by a heart attack, her father Thomas could not fly from Mexico to walk her down the aisle. Thereafter, Meghan refused to speak to him again. Overnight, their lifelong bonds were broken. All his calls and texts were ignored, letters went unanswered.”

     

    “Isolated in Mexico, the doting father became outraged by Meghan’s excommunication, so he gave a series of TV and newspaper interviews to demand Meghan talk to him and criticised the royal family for failing to support his daughter.”

     

    “The royal family were aghast. According to Meghan, a senior member of the royal family berated Harry. ‘Can’t she just go and see him and make this stop?’”

     

    “Harry, as Meghan wrote in a series of bombshell emails and texts that were released last Friday was ‘struggling because the royal family, they fundamentally don’t understand even after she and Harry tried endlessly explaining the situation to them.”

     

    “As may become clear in the months ahead, the Sussexes explanations to Charles about Thomas Markle’s behaviour were likely to be inaccurate. A crisis was unfolding. In Meghan’s words: ‘Her relationship with the royal family was breaking down.’”

     

    “Three months after the wedding, Meghan made an extraordinary decision. Instead of calling her father or flying to Los Angeles to meet him, she sent him a handwritten five-page letter.”

     

    “In Thomas Markle’s opinion, the letter was hurtful and unloving. Meghan accused him of inventing his sickness, being paranoid, fabricating stories, attacking Harry and continually lying. She urged him to stop speaking to the media.”

     

    “Although shocked by her allegedly false allegations and showing no concern for his health, Thomas Markle never actually showed the letter to anyone.”

     

    “Everything changed when the sentiments of Meghan’s letter were quoted in February 2019 in an explosive article in America’s People magazine headlined: ‘The Truth About Meghan.’”

     

    “Outraged, Thomas Markle claimed the article was not the truth and defamed him. He then allowed parts of Meghan’s letter to be republished by the Mail on Sunday.”

     

    “Meghan went to war. She sued the newspaper for breaching her privacy and copyright.”

     

    “The backwash of Meghan’s climbdown is just the beginning as to what would be an astonishing trial. She could still be saved if the Court of Appeal, despite how misleading the first trial judge, refuses to order a new trial. That decision would cause an uproar.”

     

    “A well-established truism of British justice is that litigants must come to court with clean hands. Whatever happens now, Meghan’s reputation in Britain is in freefall, but last week in New York her sparkle was as high as ever.”

     

    “Just as her self-damning confession was released, the former actress and Harry glided across the red carpet to ‘wow’ as international celebrities. Dressed in a stunning red gown, the scarlet lady smiled and told her many fans: ‘Nothing has changed. She’s still in business.’”

     

    “In her mind, whatever happens in London is irrelevant to her glittering future.”

     

    Meghan Markle Duchess of Sussex Modern Day Mrs Simpson
    Meghan Markle, after marrying into the royal family, has fast been exposed as a busybody and ‘Modern Day Mrs Simpson.’ Even her outfit for the Oprah Winfrey interview paid homage to the equally deviant Wallis, Duchess of Windsor.
    Meghan Markle Duke of Sussex Duchess of Sussex Prince Harry
    Marie Antoinette-like Meghan Markle is now a figure deservedly reviled internationally. She is the finest living example of someone who doesn’t understand the premise of “you can’t have your cake and eat it.”
    Duke and Duchess of Sussex Tom Bower
    Of this former actress, Tom Bower declared: ““The duchess has tasted her own medicine… Markle’s sparkle is fading fast. The crash of Meghan’s credibility has been dramatic. Her integrity hangs on a thin thread.”
  • Maxed-Out Murky Meg

    Maxed-Out Murky Meg

    Maxed-out Duchess of Sussex provides proof that greed ain’t really that good and in telling “untruths” about THAT letter illustrates how warped her moral compass truly is

    In the 1987 film Wall Street, the key moment that viewers will recall is Gordon Gekko’s “Greed is Good” speech. In it, Gekko – played by Michael Douglas – declares:

     

    “Greed for a lack of a better word is good. Greed is right. Greed works. Greed terrifies, cuts through and captures the essence of evolutionary spirit. Greed, in all of its forms, greed for life, for money, for love, knowledge has marked the upwards surge of mankind.”

     

    One person who clearly has seized upon such and fixated her entire life living out this fallacy is the Duchess of Sussex – a decidedly wicked, self-serving woman whose entire being is devoted to the concept of “me, myself and I.”

     

    First in her acting career, the former Meghan Markle trampled and trashed others to get to the top. She showed no mercy in this regard and with the help of her once bankrupted mother then decided to go after an even bigger prize: a royal.

     

    To get there she used her father’s lottery winnings to get a perfectly decent education, dated and married several middle class men and then decided to ditch and ‘ghost’ these people when she got her claws into Prince Harry. He, being a deadbeat drip, fell for her hook, line and sinker and did as he was told and ditched even his closest friends; she, meanwhile, “ignored” her father even when he had two heart attacks and, as her half-sister Samantha Markle Grant has stated, “hurt everybody” in her birth family.

     

    Once inside the royal fold, ‘MeGain’ realised that civic duty wasn’t on her agenda. ‘Murky Mucky’ – a woman who had claimed to have never even Googled the royal family prior to meeting her now husband yet allegedly went yachting with Prince Andrew prior to meeting his nephew – with the help of the likes of prattling PR peddler Omid Scobie then began spinning against the House of Windsor with allegations of racism and claims that she was not welcomed enthusiastically enough.

     

    Not content with causing havoc and upset as Prince Philip approached death, ‘The Modern Day Mrs Windsor’ then took on the media and then uprooted her new family to Los Angeles in search of what she and her husband claimed to be a more private life.

     

    Once settled in the luxury of their £11 million mansion in California, ‘Ginge’ and ‘Cringe’ set about contradicting all they’d previously declared by giving a tawdrily tacky interview to Oprah Winfrey and greedily and grubbily taking £110 million from Netflix and £37 million from Spotify, yet disgracefully still continued to bang on about their alleged mistreatment.

     

    Now, with the Duchess of Sussex this week admitting to a court in London that she’d told an ‘untruth’ – with her declaring: “I apologise to the Court for the fact that I had not remembered these exchanges at the time. I had absolutely no wish or intention to mislead the Defendant or the Court” – it is time for this wicked wastrel woman to do one thing: Cease annoying the public by disappearing into obscurity forever.

     

    Meghan Markle Prince Andrew yachts
    What is the truth about which member of the royal family the former Meghan Markle met first? Prince Andrew or Prince Harry? It is certainly true that both ‘Murky Mucky’ and ‘Randy Andy’ both appear to share a love of yachting and allegations that they “cavorted” on one long before the former actress turned wannabe global dominator moved to the UK have repeatedly done the rounds.
    Meghan-Markle-half-sister-Samantha-Markle
    The Duchess of Sussex’s claim that she hadn’t seen her half-sister Samantha Markle in 20 years has been proven to be a lie by fact of this photograph.
    Meghan-Markle-Lizzie-Cundy-publicity
    The “publicity shy” Duchess of Sussex (or Meghan Markle as she then was) used to be happy to hang around with publicity loving known “knicker flasher” Lizzie Cundy. Whether she actually “ghosted” her former ‘friend’ and Piers Morgan is certainly, however, debatable.

    Some questions that the mendacious minx that is the Duchess of Sussex ought to answer:

    • What was the then Meghan Markle’s association with Prince Andrew prior to meeting Prince Harry? Are there any truths to allegations that she was caught cavorting with ‘Randy Andy’ on a yacht many years ago?
    • Given ‘MeGain’ banged on about her friendship with Prince Andrew’s daughters prior to meeting Prince Harry in the infamous Oprah interview, is there really any truth to her having never Googled the royal family or researched them with a view to seeking them out?
    • Did the then Meghan Markle really “ghost” her supposed chums Lizzie Cundy and Piers Morgan or are they both just getting rather carried away with their own attention seeking agendas?
    • Prior to marrying into the royal family and since, has ‘MeGain’ “organised pap shots” of herself?
    • Why did the Duchess of Sussex lie and claim she hadn’t met her half-sister in over 20 years when photographic evidence shows quite to the contrary 13 years ago?
    • Why didn’t the Duchess of Sussex simply show herself to be a bigger person and make amends with her own father instead of going to war on him? If she had simply behaved with dignity and made one less enemy, wouldn’t she have been perceived as a far better person?
    • What is the truth about the Duchess of Sussex’s mother’s past? Why are there no photographs of Doria Ragland in her time working in aviation, what is the truth about her bankruptcy and has she ever been to jail?
    • Why is the Duchess of Sussex claiming that the royal family “silenced” her at the same time as repeatedly giving interviews to the international media and taking the dime of the hardly quiet Netflix and Spotify?
    • Why are the Duke and Duchess of Sussex now suggesting they were “cut of financially” by the royal family when they previously stated they “wanted to be financially independent”?
    • Why did the Duke and Duchess of Sussex moan about their security being “cut off” also when, in fact, Prince Charles ensured most generously that no such thing occurred?
    • Why do ‘MeGain’ and her drip husband think they should be entitled to have the public pay for their security when they turned their backs on public duty for first “privacy” and then personal profit?
    • If “convenient with the truth” to her core ‘MeGain’ wanted such a “simple life,” why did she seek out a career first in acting and then get herself into a relationship with a member of the royal family?
    • Why, subsequently, did this woman with a desire for “ordinariness” then return to Los Angeles and sign deals with the likes of Disney, Netflix and Spotify?
    • Has ‘MeGain’ ever used body doubles of herself and her son, Archie?
    • Did the Duchess of Sussex make up that she had already been married to Prince Harry for three days when she walked down the aisle on 19th May 2018?
    • How many times has ‘MeGain’ actually been married? Twice or three times?

     

  • Time Out MeGain

    Time Out MeGain

    ‘Time’ magazine’s decision to make ‘Cringe’ and ‘Ginge’ (AKA the Duke and Duchess of Sussex) their poster children is quite beyond cringeworthy

    Supposedly, ‘MeGain’ and her drip of a husband Prince Harry moved to America to ‘find freedom’ and seek privacy. ‘Ginge’ and ‘Cringe’ then did deals with Netflix and Spotify and foisted themselves upon the world with a car crash interview full of lies with the simpering sop Oprah Winfrey. These clearly were the antics of a couple wanting to quit the limelight. Not.

     

    Now, with Time magazine having ludicrously featured the wannabe left alone yet still determined to be the centre of attention pair as the poster children of their list of “the world’s most influential people” in 2021, this ghastly duo have rightly been yet again slammed by ordinary folk everywhere as utterly annoying hypocrites. Instead, couldn’t Time perhaps have chosen someone who actually achieved something remarkable like the teenage tennis sensation Emma Raducanu maybe?

     

    In an arse-licking “short profile,” written by the founder of World Central Kitchen José Andrés for the magazine, the condescendingly cretinous couple are nonsensically described as “turning compassion into boots on the ground through their Archewell Foundation.”

     

    Andrés predictably continues: “They give a voice to the voiceless through media production,” but neglects to discuss their profiteering for personal gain and the facts that they do so from an £11 million mansion and with the help of the likes of equally non-private Sir Elton John’s titleless hubby David Furnish and President Biden’s wife, Jill.

     

    As one has to expect, the Spanish chef avoids discussing ‘Meddling MeGain’s’ war with both her very own family and the media. He fails also to mention the damage done by her husband to “the firm” through his moaning and miaowing, but laughably concludes:

     

    “In a world where everyone has an opinion about people they don’t know, the duke and duchess have compassion for people they don’t know. They don’t just opine. They run toward the struggle.”

     

    Condemned in a brilliantly witty opinion piece by Maureen Callahan in the New York Post yesterday quite deservedly as “insufferable… phonies… ponderous and platitudinous,” the latest outing for these renegade royals, very much like non-sweating Prince Andrew, are called out as having shown them to be serving nobody but themselves. In fact, the pair’s determination to call out their “struggle” and “suffering” from their private jet about lifestyle is nothing but laughable.

     

    In response, as always, the couple’s pointless and pathetic PR peddler, Omid Scobie, took to Twitter to leap to their defence. Ignoring many comments from his followers that pointed out that Time made Adolf Hitler their ‘Man of the Year’ in January 1939, Scobie celebrated the couple’s appearance on the cover. He went as far to laud the former Meghan Markle’s “confidence” and her husband as a “man secure enough in himself to not be intimidated by it” and yet again illustrated his inability to show any kind of journalistic impartiality.

     

    The public, predictably, have heard quite enough. It is now time for the Duke and Duchess of Sussex to actually do something else: Time out and disappear.

     

    José Andrés Time Out Duke and Duchess of Sussex
    Chef José Andrés claims the Duke and Duchess of Sussex “take risks to help communities in need” and suggests they have “been blessed through birth and talent, and burned by fame.” He suggests “it would be much safer to enjoy their good fortune and stay silent,” but neglects to realise that the pugnacious pair are the ones who’ve gone to war on others rather than others having gone to war on them.
    Meghan Markle banana
    The former Meghan Markle is known for repeatedly slipping on metaphorical banana skins. Her and her drip of a husband seem incapable of realising the error of their ways and that with each and every move they make, they simply irritate the public and media more and more.
  • Ghastly Gas Guzzling Grabbers

    Ghastly Gas Guzzling Grabbers

    Arrogant gas guzzling grabber Prince Andrew and his wack job live-in ex-wife commit further acts of arrogance; they simply will never learn

    This week, yet again, ‘Randy Andy’ and his feckless wastrel wife ‘Fergie’ have gone and put their cloven hooves into the proverbial.

    Firstly, on Monday, the Daily Express shared that the Daily Mail’s diary editor Richard Eden had condemned the Duke of York taking a convoy consisting of a Land Rover Range Rover, a Defender and a Discovery on his trip to Balmoral.

    The paper reported:

    “Speaking to Mail+ Palace Confidential, Richard Eden said: ‘We’ve heard a lot from his brother Prince Charles recently about the environment, as we know he’s a very, very strong campaigner against climate change.”

    “Prince Andrew, for his visit with Fergie to Balmoral, he took not one, not two, but three SUVs, and obviously we wonder. The Palace wouldn’t comment at all but why does he need all these gas guzzling vehicles?”

    “They wouldn’t say but the suggestion is still for his royal protection, but these are not police cars, these are with his personalised number plates, Prince Andrew’s cars.

    “The fact he’s still getting tax-payer funded police protection when he hasn’t carried out any royal duties for almost two years and there doesn’t seem to be any real prospect he will be in the future, I’m afraid it’s outrageous.”

    Going further, The Mail on Sunday’s diary editor Charlotte Griffiths quite rightly added: “He seems to want to do it on purpose to provoke his brother, we do know that Prince Andrew loves to provoke his brother. I mean, you almost think is this a wind up, it’s so bonkers.”

    Continuing, yesterday, the Daily Express turned to an even more contentious alleged piece of news about the Duke of York’s wife, Sarah Ferguson.

    For the paper, Isabella Marsans claimed: “The Duchess of York, 61, may be handed a portion of the Sussexes patronages, according to sources. Harry, 36, and Meghan, 40, stepped away from being working members of the Royal Family last year and moved to California.”

    Given this deviant duo’s connections to the late paedophile Jeffrey Epstein and his currently incarcerated mucky madam sidekick Ghislaine Maxwell, both pieces of news yet again prove something about this caustic couple – they will never learn the art of humblese. Shame on them.

    Prince Andrew convoy
    Why did Prince Andrew and his feckless wife need to take a convoy of three cars to Balmoral? Has this man no sense of responsibility towards environmental considerations alongside has inability to have ended his friendship with a paedophile without going to stay at his New York mansion?
    Sarah Duchess of York grabber
    Elsewhere, last month, illustrating her sheer shamelessness, Sarah, Duchess of York posed for ‘Town & Country’ magazine in a series of photos. Each was accompanied by descriptions of the items she was sporting – and each item was outrageously accompanied by its pricing. For the live-in royal ex-wife to be so overtly commercial is simply tacky and tawdry.
    Sarah Duchess of York
    Yesterday also, ‘The Sun’ ludicrously suggested Sarah, Duchess of York is on the road to becoming “a TV mega mogul with the launch of her novel – amid hopes it could become the next Bridgerton.” A source told the paper: “An LA insider said: ‘Sarah believes that this book should be taken to the screen. She feels that the characters and plotlines are very strong, and that audiences at this time are lapping up this type of content. When her book deal came up, she secured the rights to co-produce a TV series and has been working with production houses in the pitching phrase. There have been discussions with networks and streamers with the premise that this series has a Bridgerton feel, and that Sarah plans more novels with these characters. There is huge optimism about this project. The book has gotten positive US feedback and she is well liked there.”
    Prince Andrew is consistent in one regard: He repeatedly makes all situations he finds himself far worse. His 2019 interview with Emily Maitlis for the BBC was undoubtedly his lowest point to date, but that he continues to behave with arrogance just shows that he is completely out of touch with the need to behave appropriately and with dignity.
  • The Disgraceful Drips

    The Disgraceful Drips

    Nikolay Kalinin on the disgraceful drips that are the Duke and Duchess of Sussex meddling in world politics and humanitarian crises

    Pointless personalities are the last people in whole world who should have the right to comment on situations such as humanitarian crises, especially ones like the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, because such gestures are obviously fake.

     

    Nevertheless, the two decided to respond to both the fall of Afghanistan to Taliban and the Haiti earthquake through a statement on the Archewell website.

     

    In their missive, the couple wrote: “As we all feel the many layers of pain due to the situation in Afghanistan, we are left speechless…though we are not meant to live in a state of suffering, we, as a people, are being conditioned to accept it. It’s easy to find ourselves feeling powerless, but we can put our values into action – together.”

     

    The couple also encouraged the readers to “join (them) in supporting a number of organisations doing critical work” and called on people in positions of power “to rapidly advance the humanitarian dialogues that are expected to take place this fall at multilateral gatherings such as the UN General Assembly and the G20 leaders’ summit.”

     

    The royal rotters surprisingly, however, made no mention of Joe Biden, of whom they have been supportive in the past, and who has been seen as widely responsible for the ongoing chaos in Afghanistan due to the withdrawal of US troops.

     

    GB News presenter Simon McCoy perfectly responded to the couple’s announcement by stating: “It’s a bit rich from the Duke and Duchess of Montecito to be telling us the world is in a mess.”

     

    He then continued: “Sorry, only they would break their silence to tell us they are speechless… Do we need to talk about this? I get myself into trouble every time. What was I, ‘bitter and twisted,’ yesterday? I wonder what I’ll be today.”

     

    I will have to admit however that Prince Harry has some say in this matter, since he himself served in Afghanistan twice and has provided support for British veterans. Still, we have to keep in mind that we’re talking about a person who’s living an extremely comfortable life in California and who previously stated that he and his wife were moving there to enjoy a more private existence.

     

    If narcissistic ‘MeGain’ and her dopey drip of a husband truly do care about helping others less fortunate than them, why don’t they instead lobby the US Government into evacuating more Afghans – in particular women – fleeing from Taliban persecution? It is time also that these disgraceful drips stop trying to be like the Kardashians by constantly talking about their family drama and start behaving like decent public figures.

     

    Prince Harry Afghanistan
    Prince Harry pictured in Afghanistan in 2013. On Wednesday, of the couple’s statement ‘The Mirror’s’ Liam Gulliver remarked: “Once again Meghan Markle and Prince Harry have whipped up a frenzy with the simple act of opening their mouths… Needless to say, the statement was ripped to shreds within hours of being published, with reports branding it a ‘woke word salad’ that was completely ‘irrelevant.’”
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7enLIeQZyTM
    The couple’s soppy statement was slammed also because it contained so many “Americanisms” – indicating it was written by ‘MeGain’ alone rather than her jointly with Prince Harry. Of it, the ‘Mirror’ observed: “Social media users claimed the use of American spelling throughout the statement suggested it was largely penned by the Duchess. Words such as ‘fall’ as opposed to ‘autumn,’ and the spelling of ‘organizations’ and ‘realize,’ were overtly American in the text. One person wrote: ‘If nothing else, the way ‘realise’ has been spelt shows this was certainly not written by Prince Harry,’ while a second noted: ‘And fall not autumn.’”
  • Omid’s Epilogue

    Omid’s Epilogue

    In the wake of Omid Scobie adding an epilogue to ‘Finding Freedom,’ Nikolay Kalinin calls him out yet again as a childish prat

    In the time since The Steeple Times exposed the Duke and Duchess of Sussexes’ PR peddler Omid Scobie as nothing but a marauding mouthpiece, he surprisingly went rather quiet. Unfortunately, now, this tall tale teller is now back with yet another announcement that honestly no one could actually give two hoots about.

     

    Just a year after launching his blabbering book, Finding Freedom – which the soppy ‘Sussex Squad’ attempted to make popular by mass-writing positive reviews of – Scobie announced that it will now receive a new epilogue that will detail the couple’s “move to California (and) the various philanthropic and business endeavours the Sussexes have been involved with since their move and what’s to come with Archewell Productions.”

     

    In addition to that, the addition will address the impact of the Duke of Edinburgh’s demise on the couple and “the continuous challenges the couple face regarding privacy and the British press.” Hold your noses for yet more self-serving gibberish is most definitely set to follow.

     

    This move contradicts previous claims made by ‘royal expert’ Duncan Larcombe that the updated edition will feature an “extremely telling” chapter about the rift between Prince Harry and the royals that will result in “no chance of a reconciliation ever.”

     

    While most claims from ‘royal experts’ are often decidedly dubious, it is important to mention that it has only been a year since the original version was published. Why is it then that Scobie and his squad of prattlers already feel it necessary to update the book with an epilogue? Couldn’t ‘MeGain’ and ‘Hapless Hazza’ just have had him post a series of simple blog posts, perhaps, instead?

     

    Then again, it’s likely that hardly anyone will buy the book even in its updated form, considering that just five months after the original edition of Finding Freedom went on sale, several of its copies were spotted on sale for 99p – a huge step down from the original price of £20, which was too high already for no good reason.

     

    Once again, I would point out to Scobie that his attempts to silence the likes of ‘Yankee Wally’ are certainly not going going down well with anyone and would add that his latest antics just confirm his very much deserved status as a thoroughly childish prat. It is time that this silly, little boy did one thing: Learnt the art of silence.

     

    Omid Scobie Finding Freedom
    Scobie’s latest update to ‘Finding Freedom’ transparently shows him as a desperado hanging onto the coattails of the deservedly disliked deviant duo that is the Duke and Duchess of Sussex. He does himself n favours with his audacious antics.
    Yesterday, Scobie took to Twitter to moan that people were “triggered” by what he described as “inaccurate reports” about the edits to his book.
    Bizarrely, in recent days, this pointless pillock has also banged on about Ben Affleck and Jennifer Lopez. Is there anything this busybody can resist prattling about?
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lNIci5ttNCo
    The cringeworthy addition will supposedly document “Meghan’s emotional healing journey from losing a child to the birth of their daughter” and will no doubt allow Scobie to yet again try and portray the wicked wastrels that are the Duke and Duchess of Sussex as victims. They are, in fact, anything but.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fb0x3FB8qcE
    In a video shared on YouTube this week, it was suggested that “when the novelty wears off, Prince Harry will realise that he is a lost soul… And Meghan will be portrayed as a villain.” That is certainly true and whatever Omid Scobie thinks, he won’t be able to change that.
  • Ginge & Cringe Drink Themselves Silly

    Ginge & Cringe Drink Themselves Silly

    Nikolay Kalinin slams ‘Ginge & Cringe’ (AKA the Duke and Duchess of Sussex) for drinking themselves silly on themselves as their critic ‘Yankee Wally’ is quite rightly restored on social media

    It’s been nearly two years since Netflix and the Duke and Duchess of Sussex signed a deal worth £110 million ($150 million), and also a deal with Spotify worth £37 million ($50 million). In all that time, the couple has produced only one podcast, and have only recently announced their Netflix project, and now they are coming under pressure in the US to “produce the goods.”

     

    According to the Mirror’s royal editor Russell Myers, he expects that soon the bosses at both companies will start becoming suspicious of where their money is going. In a recent article, he stated:

     

    “Where is the content? We have had one podcast so far, and that hasn’t caught the world alight. And they have a promised Netflix show which I’m sure will be fantastic because it’s all about the Invictus Games.”

     

    “But certainly the big bosses at the two streaming giants will be wanting their pound of flesh. And if they are not producing the goods, the big bosses will be wondering where their hard-earned dollars are going exactly.”

     

    The idea that the Sussexes’ efforts are underwhelming is not without solid evidence; for example, the Spotify podcast has only two episodes, and it was only recently that ‘Ginge & Cringe’ hired Rebecca Sananes as head of Archewell Audio, which was responsible for producing the podcast.

     

    In addition to underdelivering when it comes to content, it has recently been reported by Page Six that pointless prattlers Meghan, Duchess of Sussex and David Furnish began working on their Netflix series even before the couple stepped back from royal duties. This contradicts Prince Harry’s claims that such big deals were “never part of the plan,” and that they only did it after being “financially cut off.”

     

    Furthermore, the couple were set to partner up with the now-defunct streaming service Quibi, with a source telling Page Six: “Meg and Jeff actually went to see Harry and Meghan to get them to sign… but it’s no surprise they went for Netflix,” once again contradicting Prince Harry’s weird warblings.

     

    I can respect that the couple are trying to earn some money on their own, but I am suspicious of Prince Harry’s inconsistency, and it makes me wonder: “What other things have the couple stated that are inconsistent with their past actions? “

     

    We can already tell that the couple is not so privacy-loving because of how many times they call out the royal family and bleat to the media. We also know that they were still being financially supported by Prince Charles until the summer of 2020, despite telling Oprah Winfrey that they were left to live off what was left to Prince Harry by the late Diana, Princess of Wales. Today, I ask: “What else are they untruths about?”

     

    The Duke and Duchess of Sussex should really focus on trying to project an honest public image instead of trying to silence people like the crusading commentator ‘Yankee Wally’ – who was quite rightly recently ‘unbanned’ on YouTube – after the efforts of the likes of ‘MeGain’s’ mouthpiece Omid Scobie and his ‘Sussex Squaddie’ friends failed, and then maybe, just maybe the British public will start liking them more.

     

    Duke and Duchess of Sussex
    GINGE & CRINGE STRIKE AGAIN – This morning, yet again, the couple were quite deservedly slammed with the ‘Daily Mail’ asking: “Is Meghan Harry’s real ghostwriter? Royal aides fear more ‘truth bombs’ and ‘poor me introspection’ as Duke stuns his family by revealing he’s written a Megxit memoir – but ‘DIDN’T tell Charles about the $20m deal.’”
    Omid Scobie
    GINGE & CRINGE STRIKE AGAIN – In recent days, ‘MeGain’s’ go-to mouthpiece Omid Scobie has attempted to make himself out to be a victim of YouTube star ‘Yankee Wally.’ Though she was briefly “silenced” both there and on Twitter, she is back with a vengeance and will continue to call out the collection of twisted twerps that are the ‘Sussex Squad.’
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5kJTmJMG-Lc
  • Pointless Prattlers Team Up

    Pointless Prattlers Team Up

    That the pointless prattler the Duchess of Sussex is to team up with Sir Elton John’s titleless husband David Furnish for Netflix is nothing but oily

    News that two equally pointless prattlers – Meghan, the mouthy Duchess of Sussex and the titleless moaner David Furnish – have teamed up isn’t surprising.

     

    Coming together as executive producers for “a new animated series for Netflix,” the dastardly duo are to make a “series that follows a young girl’s adventures.” It has a working title of Pearl and cringeworthily will be “inspired by a variety of influential women from history.”

     

    Pointless prattlers Meghan Duchess of Sussex Danny Williams David Furnish 1
    A statement from Netflix announced the coming together of Meghan, the Duchess of Sussex and Sir Elton John’s hapless hubby David Furnish.

    Taking to Instagram to reveal his thoughts on their partnership, the man who once bleated to the Daily Mail’s Sebastian Shakespeare that he’d effectively like to be called ‘Lady John’ as he didn’t think it fair that he hasn’t got a title announced:

     

    “I am delighted that we are finally able to announce this exciting animated series. Meghan, the Duchess of Sussex and I are deeply passionate about bringing the inspirational and positive stories of extraordinary women from around the world to a global audience of all ages. The team collaborating on the series are first class, and @netflix are the perfect partner.”

     

    Going further, ‘The Modern Day Mrs Simpson’ and the worse half of the duo that is ‘Cringe and Ginge’ added in a statement subsequently:

     

    “Like many girls her age, our heroine Pearl is on a journey of self-discovery as she tries to overcome life’s daily challenges.”

     

    “I’m thrilled that Archewell Productions, partnered with the powerhouse platform of Netflix, and these incredible producers, will together bring you this new animated series, which celebrates extraordinary women throughout history.”

     

    “David Furnish and I have been eager to bring this special series to light, and I am delighted we are able to announce it today.”

     

    Previously ever-so-private Furnish and continually ever-so-public ‘MeGain’ (in spite of claiming she wishes to be ever-so-private) frankly are two people the world could do without more from. Please, Netflix, change your position and do the decent thing: Keep this oily, ingratiating pair off our screens.

     

    Pictured top: Titleless twerp David Furnish with a “nightclub hunk” he supposedly bought an apartment for, Danny Williams (left), and the alleged bully of multiple staff formerly known as Meghan Markle (right).

     

    Meghan Markle David Furnish
    Both the Duchess of Sussex and David Furnish are only really known globally for whom they are married to. This tedious pair truly are actually made for one another.