The 42-year old ex-girlfriend of 86-year old New York art collector Henry Buhl was christened a gold-digger after she sued him for £1.1 million ($1.5 million) after claiming that he had said he would provide for her “for the rest of her life”. According to the New York Post, “leggy Czech” Daniela Zahradnikova moved in with Buhl in 2006 and “provided ‘wifely duties’ for him, including cooking, cleaning — and plenty of sex” but in March 2016, the ex-executive director of Investors Overseas Service responded by claiming: “I’ve her free rent for a long time, for about ten years… It never worked”. Our analysis: A silly duo whom truly deserve one another.
Subscribe to our free once daily email newsletter here:[contact-form-7 id=”225″ title=”Contact form 1″]
Two stories to keep beside you
Jason Shifrin
Jason Shifrin, the publicity craving author of the most originally titled Money, Money, Money, took to social media to defend the rightly tarnished name of his former PR representative Max Clifford’s daughter, Louise, in October 2015.
Marianne Lee Travis
The “shy” Swedish born wife of the “compulsive groper and sexual opportunist” Dave Lee Travis since 1971, Marianne Lee Travis has been described as “dressing like Jimmy Kranky”.
Readers have their say
6 comments
I met his son Anthony in London at a party. He is friends with Marie-Claire von Alvensleben and that about says it all about this family and their taste in women.
Another money whore!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
They say a fool and his money are easily parted. Henry Buhl plainly is definitely that. What did he expect a woman 44 years his junior saw in him? His good looks? NO. His personality? NO. She wanted his money and after putting up with him since 2006, I say: GOOD ON HER. She deserves the lot.
Was she employed as house staff ? It is surprising that as a girlfriend she was expected to cook and clean
I think they are both faulty and deviant but overall the dirty old man should pay and settle
Is a £110k per year the acceptable rate for prostitution? From her perspective I suppose with the other fringe benefits thrown in, clothes jewellery, parties, contacts etc, it probably wasn’t a bad deal. After all she is certainly no beauty, with her looks I very much doubt she could have earned that on the street. From his perspective it was a cheap deal too, it would have cost him a lot more in every other possible way. All things considered they both did alright.
Do read
‘ Do you sincerely want to be rich ‘ by Charles Raw, Bruce Page and Geoffrey Hodgson
You will never regret buying this absorbing cornerstone book