Wed Feb 19, 2020 London
X

The Steeple Times is an online magazine with a following of upto 880,000 unique views per day on our best day yet.

  • We have 91,000 daily subscribers by email.

  • We typically average around 320,000 unique views per day.

  • We currently have 65 contributing authors who range from students to the actor, writer and producer Steven Berkoff and the champion jockey Frankie Dettori.

Combining a mix of society's last word and both wit and wisdom, The Steeple Times covers food, drink and fine dining as well as luxury, travel, the arts, individuals of influence and current affairs in the United Kingdom, America and elsewhere. We are best described as being akin to "a cross between The Huffington Post and Private Eye".

 

The magazine's following is affluent, engaged and international. With 41% of readers coming from the UK and 38% from America, The Steeple Times also has strong presence within Canadian, Italian, German and Australian territories.

 

EDITORIAL

Editorial comment from Matthew Steeples Our editor tells it like it is and he rarely minces his words

Phillipified

Journalist Melanie Phillips is right in her analysis of the impact of the decision not to publish the full correspondence between Tony Blair and George W. Bush before the 2003 invasion of Iraq

 

On the 2nd June, Melanie Phillips, a journalist loathed by many on the left, argued that “the threat from Saddam Hussein…” [and thus his Weapons of Mass Destruction] “… was real” in an article for The Times.

 

Tony Blair and George W. Bush may be remembered very differently in history
Tony Blair and George W. Bush may be remembered very differently in history

Though many will throw their hands up in abject horror and disgust, Phillips has a point. Sir John Chilcott could have used this opportunity to set the record straight about it being fact that Saddam gassed thousands of Kurds and also that he somehow managed to hide the arsenal of Weapons of Mass Destruction that he did, at some point at least, possess. Phillips rightly points out that those that blame Blair for holding up publication miss the point. The real reason that all of this correspondence isn’t being shared is to protect the Anglo-American ‘Special Relationship’.

 

It is about time that the true story of the background to the War on Iraq was revealed. As the historian Andrew Roberts once suggested, strangely, if this were to happen, it could end up becoming documented as a chapter where Blair and Bush ultimately wouldn’t be remembered as the true villains.

 

 

Subscribe to our free once daily email newsletter here:[wysija_form id=”1″]

 

Comments

10 comments on “Phillipified”

  1. I think it was 100% reasonable to think that the Iraqis had WOMD and that Saddam’s regime was an enormously dangerous and destabilising for who had already waged three bloody wars as well as presiding over a totalitarian state that aspired to Hitlerian levels of horror. We took far to long to do anything about it and we made a huge error in not planning properly for the aftermath of victory.

    1. Your point is most valid. Not planning for the aftermath was a major mistake. We failed to look to history but getting rid of Saddam, in the long run, will be remembered as a good thing ultimately.

  2. The repellant, reptilian Tony Blair is a self-serving war-criminal and should be dealt with as such.
    “100% reasonable to think that the Iraqis had WOMD”………???!!! Utter horsefeathers ! (Beggars belief that
    anybody could possibly think such a thing!)

  3. The poor weapons inspector David Kelly was intimidated, bullied and harassed to death. He was guilty of disclosing the truth. Politicians don’t always support the truth, ask Alistair Campbell.

  4. I agree with you on many points, Matthew, but not here. A few years ago, I had a conversation with an engineer friend. He told me that neither the UK nor the USA was ever in danger from ‘WoMD’. To fire a weapon halfway around the world would take something the size of the Redstone Rocket and technology akin to what NASA has. You don’t need a weapons inspector to tell you that a country like a Iraq (which had been subjected to severe economic sanctions) would never have had the resources to develop such a thing. Most of their stuff was secondhand Russian, which would have been out of date here in the 1960s. And yes, according to the grapevine, Mr Bliar knew all this.

    Besides which, I really am tired of the ‘divide and rule’ games that have been played out in the Middle East. Saddam Hussein was indeed a tyrant, but what most people forget is that just a few decades ago, the USA was actually a supporter of his. Most notably, they supported Saddam when he invaded Iran – only for the tables to later be turned during the first Gulf War.

    If we look back through history, western intervention in the Middle East has never worked out well. Britain fought three disastrous wars with Afghanistan in the 19th/early 20th century. Then following WW1, the Ottoman Empire was carved up along lines chosen by the Allies without enough consideration for the various cultural/ethnic groups that lived there. Then there was the gassing of the Kurds in Mesopotamia. Then the creation of Israel. Then the installation of the Shah in Iran – a man so unpopular that the people actually overthrew him in favour of the Ayatollah Khomeini. Not to mention the more recent Iraq/Afghanistan wars and now the emergence of ISIS (which arguably would not have happened if it hadn’t been for the invasion of Iraq). At some point, you surely have to say that enough is enough – and leave the Middle East well alone.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • Subscribe Daily Newsletter

    @ 2020, thesteepletimes.com. All rights reserved.