As it is revealed that Melania Trump was nicknamed “Rapunzel,” we again revisit the question of whether the former first lady was trafficked to America by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell
In August 2020, The Steeple Times asked: “Was Melania Trump trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein” and now with revelations yesterday in Business Insider that the former first lady was nicknamed “Rapunzel” by the American secret services we again revisit the story of the connections between these equally strange characters.
“Given the disgraced financier’s planes frequently jetted back and forth to Eastern Europe, stranger things indeed have happened [than that it was Jeffrey Epstein whom first brought the now former first lady into America]. Melania Trump could have flown on the infamous ‘Lolita Express’ and she could [even have been] one of mucky Maxwell’s recruits.”
Though photographed repeatedly with the deviant duo over the years, the Trumps – whom first met according to Wikipedia in September 1998 – have repeatedly rubbished Epstein’s claim and attempted to distance themselves from the croaked paedophile.
Responding of Epstein’s wild allegation, another man who claims to have introduced Melania Knauss – subsequently “nicknamed ‘Rapunzel’ by the secret service because she rarely left ‘her tower, aka the White House residence’” – to Donald Trump, Italian nightclub Paolo Zampolli, simply responded “NO WAY. Fake news. B.S.”
Pictured top: A mock version of Melania Trump in fancy dress (left) and a real photo of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell in fancy dress at Windsor Castle in 2006. Epstein dressed in a Navy SEAL uniform for the occasion – Princess Beatrice’s 18th birthday party – and included both legitimate service ribbons and medals and fictitious ones in spite of the fact he’d never been a Navy SEAL.
Donald Trump – whom “wished” his one-time chum Ghislaine Maxwell “well” in July 2020 – and his wife Melania Trump have appeared in many pictures with the late paedophile Jeffrey Epstein and his mucky madam Ghislaine Maxwell. According to ‘Insider’ in July 2019: “After Trump was elected president, Epstein started claiming that he was the one who introduced Trump to then-Slovenian model Melania Knauss.”In October 2000, the Duke of York was pictured at a nightclub alongside Ghislaine Maxwell and Heidi Klum. The theme of the bash was ‘pimps and hookers’ and for the occasion the ‘Bouncing Czech’s’ deviant daughter dressed in “a bleach blonde wig, midriff bearing top and gold pants” whilst the model wore “a black wig, red lipstick, black latex bodice and black skirt.”Melania Trump’s outfits, due to her position on the international stage, have regularly been dissected by the media. Her “fashion fails” – unlike those of Ghislaine Maxwell – however, have not to our knowledge included dressing up as a hooker.
In further evidence of the bizarre and frankly weird activities supposedly ‘enjoyed’ by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell this morning, crusading author Kirby Sommers tweeted: “What I will say now that I keep silent about because I was asked to is there exists a photo showing Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell at Bohemian Grove. The elite meet there once every year to worship a 30-40 foot owl god they call ‘Molech.’”
In another recent tweet, Sommers shared an image of Donald Trump with Robert Maxwell and asked an important question. Her missive read: “Robert Maxwell was one of Donald Trump’s first forays into Russia. Did Maxwell launder money for Trump?”
Dinner between Prince Andrew and Jeffrey Epstein is described as being like “Eyes Wide Shut with a twist” and “creepy” by journalist Katie Couric
Clearly, as can inevitably be expected of a mouse-not-a-man who claims he can’t even sweat, Prince Andrew is still failing to face up to the music in regards to the civil lawsuit he has been forced to accept having been served with.
Pictured this morning in The Sun driving his Range Rover back from Balmoral to his Royal Lodge, Windsor home and waving in a “brazen” fashion, ‘Randy Andy’ also got a mention in a Newsweek feature yesterday in which the journalist Katie Couric described his antics at an “Eyes Wide Shut with a twist – creepy and body-part art” style dinner at the late paedophile Jeffrey Epstein’s New York mansion.
Couric added: “I couldn’t imagine what Epstein and Andrew were up to, apart from trying to cultivate friends in the media. Which, in retrospect, they must have figured they’d need when the paedophilia charges started rolling in.”
Of the dinner and his stay at the Epstein residence, the Duke of York previously arrogantly remarked:
“I went there with the sole purpose of saying to him that because he had been convicted, it was inappropriate for us to be seen together.”
“Oh, in 2010, there certainly wasn’t a party to celebrate his release in December because it was a small dinner party, there were only eight or ten of us I think at the dinner. If there was a party then I’d know nothing about that.”
“At the end of the day, with a benefit of all the hindsight that one can have, it was definitely the wrong thing to do. But at the time I felt it was the honourable and right thing to do and I admit fully that my judgment was probably coloured by my tendency to be too honourable but that’s just the way it is.”
Katie Couric attended the 2010 dinner alongside amongst others Chelsea Handler, Woody Allen, Charlie Rose, Prince Andrew, Eva Andersson-Dubin and George Stephanopoulos. It was supposedly her only encounter with the late paedophile.‘Jeffrey Epstein’s Paedo Palace’ – Herbert Straus House, 9 East 71st Street, Lenox Hill, New York, NY 10021, United States of America was the setting for the dinner.Top: Jeffrey Epstein pictured on the telephone in his decidedly kitsch ‘Bet Lynch-esque’ mansion on date unknown. Bottom: Prince Andrew pictured at the door of the residence waving as two young ladies and Jeffrey Epstein depart in December 2010.
Prince Andrew’s most ridiculous remarks
“I could have worse tags than ‘Airmiles Andy’ – although I don’t know what they are.”
“People say to me: ‘Would you like to swap your life with me for 24 hours? Your life must be very strange.’ But, of course, I have not experienced any other life. It’s not strange to me.”
“There’s a slight problem with the sweating because I have a peculiar medical condition which is that I don’t sweat or I didn’t sweat at the time and that was… was it… yes, I didn’t sweat at the time because I had suffered what I would describe as an overdose of adrenalin in the Falkland’s War when I was shot at and I simply… it was almost impossible for me to sweat. And it’s only because I have done a number of things in the recent past that I am starting to be able to do that again. So, I’m afraid to say that there’s a medical condition that says that I didn’t do it so therefore…”
“We can’t be certain as to whether or not that’s my hand on her whatever it is, left… left side … [of the photograph with Virginia Roberts] Nobody can prove whether or not that photograph has been doctored but I don’t recollect that photograph ever being taken.”
“I went [to Jeffrey Epstein’s house] with the sole purpose of saying to him that because he had been convicted, it was inappropriate for us to be seen together. And I had a number of people counsel me in both directions, either to go and see him or not to go and see him and I took the judgement call that because this was serious and I felt that doing it over the telephone was the chicken’s way of doing it. I had to go and see him and talk to him.”
“[Jeffrey Epstein’s house] was a convenient place to stay. I mean I’ve gone through this in my mind so many times. At the end of the day, with a benefit of all the hindsight that one can have, it was definitely the wrong thing to do. But at the time I felt it was the honorable and right thing to do and I admit fully that my judgment was probably colored by my tendency to be too honorable but that’s just the way it is.”
“I’ve always been told I was extremely well behaved as a kid.”
“If you’re a man it is a positive act to have sex with somebody. You have to … take some sort of positive action and so therefore if you try to forget it’s very difficult to try and forget a positive action and I do not remember anything.”
“It’s slightly complicated for people to grasp the idea of a head of state in human form.”
And finally, stating the bloody obvious: “Today is reality. Yesterday is history.”
In claiming “Jeremy [Corbyn] is always right” the ultimate dumbo Diane Abbott MP yet again shows herself as an utter berk
This morning on BBC Radio 4’s Today programme, she-who-wears-two-left-shoes Diane Abbott MP ludicrously suggested “Jeremy [Corbyn] is always right” and claimed his replacement as leader of the Labour party, Sir Keir Starmer MP, talks “nonsense” and is “quite strange.”
In the wake of Andy McDonald MP quitting Sir Keir’s front bench, the former shagging partner of Jeremy Corbyn ridiculously rambled on about the minimum wage and ranted:
“Andy McDonald is a very nice man… He is personally very committed to fairness and justice.”
“I argue that there is no point clapping… You can’t live on claps… It’s no good clapping these people and then not being prepared to give them a decent minimum wage.”
“On the question of Keir Starmer, I think we have to look at some of his advisors. It now seems that Peter Mandelson is a top advisor to Keir Starmer.”
“We only have to look at Peter Mandelson’s life and times to understand where he stands in relation to the wealthy and the powerful.”
“I think Keir Starmer’s problems are his advisors and he needs to be listening to his own party and grass roots party members more.”
“Keir Starmer’s people are spinning it, but in 2017, people forget you know, Jeremy got more votes than any other Labour leader and, you know, if he hadn’t had most of the PLP attacking him night and day, he might possibly have won in 2017.”
Curiously, during the interview, the “intellectual giant” Diane Abbott got lucky and managed to swerve such issues as that of her own son’s criminality and her remarkable inability to add up. Whatever next for her? An appearance on Countdown? Anne Robinson would quake in her boots faced with this brainbox. Not.
Shame on her – She-who-cannot-use-a-calculator Diane Abbott MP is happy to be photographed with convicted racists such as Margaret Burke, a Labour councillor who disgustingly dressed up in a Nazi uniform and recruited youths to daub buildings with swastikas.Aside from being utterly inept with numbers, Abbott is someone who cannot intelligently engage in any kind of debate without resorting to blaming white people for whatever she believes to be wrong with any situation.
Illogical messages from Diane Abbott MP
Responding to be accused of not being able to add up:
“I do know my figures.”
“Of course, I think things through.”
“I’m here, of course I’m here. I’m doing a media interview, I’m going on to do another media interview. There’s no truth that I’m not in the media talking about what happened.”
“I think I’m Shadow Home Secretary.”
Diane Abbott on the cost of recruiting 10,000 police officers:
“If we recruit 10,000 police officers, men and women, over a four year period, we believe it will be about £300,000… Sorry, I mean, they will cost, it will cost, erm, about £80 million.”
“We will be paying them the average, it’s been thought through. Of course it’s been thought through.”
“What we said is, of course, we’ll find the money to recruit the 10,000 police people by cutting the, cutting the money… I think that would give us 170, erm, sorry… We would find the money by restoring levels of capital gains tax.”
On racism:
“The British invented racism.”
“White people love playing divide and rule. We should not play their game… I don’t think saying that is racist… It was part of a sequenced debate that I said that.”
“We need unity between black, Asian, minority ethnic and Muslim people – we need the maximum public show of unity. Because time after time, in the past 32 years, I’ve seen efforts of people to organise disrupted by white people.”
On dogs:
“I was a postman one Christmas and I developed a morbid fear of dogs.”
On her own marriage:
“I wanted my marriage to work, but it didn’t.”
On “outsiders” and “insiders”:
“Outsiders often have an insight than an insider doesn’t quite have.”
On being an MP:
“Being an MP is a good job, the sort of job all working-class parents want for their children – clean, indoors and no heavy lifting. What could be nicer?”
“I want power. I suppose that’s the story of my life – seeking power.”
“I’m in politics to be a voice for people who don’t have a voice.”
On the Kurdistan Workers’ Party:
“There is no difference between the PKK and ISIS.”
On the vile piece of toerag that is Naomi Campbell:
“I am a fangirl of Naomi Campbell.”
On why she wanted to be Labour’s candidate to be Mayor of London:
“One of my advantages, if I was Labour’s candidate, is that loads of people know me. I’m not just talking about politics – they’ve seen me on Come Dine With Me, they’ve seen me on Pointless.”
“I am not associated with the past.”
On women in Northern Ireland:
“Women in Northern Ireland are second class citizens.”
Diane Abbott on supporting the IRA:
“Defeat for the British state would be a great liberation. A defeat in Northern Ireland would be a defeat indeed.”
On supposedly changing her views on supporting the IRA:
“It was 34 years ago, I had a rather splendid afro at the time. I don’t have the same hairstyle, I don’t’ have the same views. It was 34 years on. The hairstyle is gone, some of the views are gone.”
On supposedly changing her views about MI5:
“At that time, I and a lot of people felt MI5 needed reforming. It has since been reformed and, of course, I would not call for its abolition now. That MI5 has gone. It’s been reformed, it’s a different MI5 and that’s why so many of us are able to support it now.”
Diane Abbott on Mao Zedong:
“I suppose some people will judge that on balance Mao did more good than harm… He led his country from feudalism, he helped to defeat the Japanese and he left his country on the verge of the great economic success they are having now. I was just putting the case for Mao.”
Insulting white mothers:
“West Indian mums will go to the wall for their children.”
On being a mother:
“I put being a mother ahead of being a politician.”
On abortion:
“Abortion is an issue of conscience for the Labour party.”
“I believe every abortion is a tragedy.”
Diane Abbott on sex:
“Of course, sex is great. We don’t have to pretend otherwise.”
On masculinity:
“There is a crisis of masculinity in Britain because of the pressures rapid economic and social change have placed on masculine identity. A generation of men are in transit and unclear of their social role. They are also under pressure to live up to pornified ideals.”
Diane Abbott on her decision to send her criminal son to a private school:
“[It was] indefensible and intellectually incoherent.”
“I’m not the only Labour MP who sent their child to public school, but I’m the only one who’s questioned about it.”
On parenting:
“When fast food is not a treat but a dietary staple, the children surf the Internet all day in dark corners of the room and are bombarded with the latest gadgets. Things replace parental standards.”
“Tackling obesity is key… Families are struggling against a tide of junk information on junk food.”
Diane Abbott on being demoted to the backbenches:
“I was a backbencher for a few years and there is an awful lot to do on the backbenches.”
On her political strategy:
“[I am going to stop Labour going into a] dead end.”
“In politics, the people I most despise are those who have no values.”
On defending the indefensible:
“You can’t defend the indefensible. Anything you say sounds self-serving and hypocritical.”
Diane Abbott on her many mistakes:
“You learn from your mistakes.”
On her future plans:
“I want to write a best-selling book.”
On being intensely disliked:
“[I am the] most abused of any Labour MP ever.”
And a final word from Diane Abbott:
“This is going round in circles… I’ve got nothing more to say, I’ve got nothing more to say.”
Alleged shoplifting tellybox twerp Richard Madeley is turned into a lookalike of inept comedy character broadcaster Alan Partridge
Yesterday on Twitter, an animated image did the rounds in which the incompetent and tactless television and radio presenter Richard Madeley morphed into looking just like the incompetent and tactless television and radio presenter Alan Partridge.
Both socially inept and both capable of offending their guests, the GIF circulated was brilliant in that both mouses-not-men have inflated senses of importance and fame. Equally, both shameless self-promoters are clearly bewildered that their audiences have an inability to recognise their self-created statures.
This morning, also on Twitter, the “cringeworthy” drunken old sop Judy Finnigan’s husband was once again trending. This time, Romford, Essex born ‘Madman Madeley’ was under fire over yet more stupid remarks about COVID-19 on ITV1’s Good Morning Britain. One user somewhat generously described him as “silly” and “daft” whilst another claimed him to be a “pompous prat” who’d “put them off their breakfast.” They are spot on and it is time that this twerp was taken off the telly.
“There’s been so much angst about it… It’s been so choppy, but, yes, he got married and now we’ve got a daughter-in-law.”
In conversation with President Clinton
“I know what it’s like to be wronged by the press. I was once accused of shoplifting. Unlike you though, I knew I was innocent.”
Of women
“I’ve never met a single woman who’s happy with the way she looks, except Jordan, although I’ve never met her.”
On elephants
“So, are you telling me elephants are not born evil?”
To a man crying after paramedics saved his life
“Stop crying! This is supposed to make you happy! Anyway, after the break, the biggest dog in the UK. And he really is big. Don’t miss it!”
In Nostradamus-like fashion on coronavirus
“We are being duped… [They are trying to] put the fear of God into the public. A great reckoning is coming.”
On lockdowns
“There’s no point in running away and hiding from the virus.”
Of old women skipping
“There’s not many better things than seeing an older woman skipping.”
Of wanting to be black
“I hope when I’m reincarnated I come back black because you age better.”
To Keira Knightley
“Can we get some make up please, get Keira looking like a crack whore, she’d make a good crack whore.”
Of an autistic teenager
“The thing with Daniel [Wakeford, a ‘star’ on Channel 4’s Undateables] is, he has autism but is very intelligent and as we can see extremely talented. Has Daniel always been autistic?”
To a caller
“I understand you have a little lad of 12. Is it a boy or a girl?”
In another Alan Partridge-esque moment earlier this month, Judy Finnigan’s husband banged on about the dangers of quicksand. Naturally, he had to make personal reference and claimed: “It got me once… More of that later.”In July, the ‘Dorian Gray of Daytime Telly’ was mocked as looking like the new person portrayed in the new Diana, Princess of Wales statue. At the time, the all-round berk was also lambasted after claiming he “suffered from PTSD after his son’s wedding.”‘Deranged Dicky’ once dressed up as Ali G to present ‘This Morning.’ It was later voted “one of the worst moments in television history.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rcx3FUarNiI&t=1s
Alleged shoplifter Madeley’s ‘mummy’ wife, Judy Finnigan, is best known for quaffing, flashing her boobs and falling off sofas. In October 2014, she inexcusably defended a footballer later convicted of rape by saying: “The rape wasn’t violent… He didn’t cause any bodily harm to the person… She had far too much to drink.”
‘Time’ magazine’s decision to make ‘Cringe’ and ‘Ginge’ (AKA the Duke and Duchess of Sussex) their poster children is quite beyond cringeworthy
Supposedly, ‘MeGain’ and her drip of a husband Prince Harry moved to America to ‘find freedom’ and seek privacy. ‘Ginge’ and ‘Cringe’ then did deals with Netflix and Spotify and foisted themselves upon the world with a car crash interview full of lies with the simpering sop Oprah Winfrey. These clearly were the antics of a couple wanting to quit the limelight. Not.
Now, with Time magazine having ludicrously featured the wannabe left alone yet still determined to be the centre of attention pair as the poster children of their list of “the world’s most influential people” in 2021, this ghastly duo have rightly been yet again slammed by ordinary folk everywhere as utterly annoying hypocrites. Instead, couldn’t Time perhaps have chosen someone who actually achieved something remarkable like the teenage tennis sensation Emma Raducanu maybe?
In an arse-licking “short profile,” written by the founder of World Central Kitchen José Andrés for the magazine, the condescendingly cretinous couple are nonsensically described as “turning compassion into boots on the ground through their Archewell Foundation.”
As one has to expect, the Spanish chef avoids discussing ‘Meddling MeGain’s’ war with both her very own family and the media. He fails also to mention the damage done by her husband to “the firm” through his moaning and miaowing, but laughably concludes:
“In a world where everyone has an opinion about people they don’t know, the duke and duchess have compassion for people they don’t know. They don’t just opine. They run toward the struggle.”
Condemned in a brilliantly witty opinion piece by Maureen Callahan in the New York Post yesterday quite deservedly as “insufferable… phonies… ponderous and platitudinous,” the latest outing for these renegade royals, very much like non-sweating Prince Andrew, are called out as having shown them to be serving nobody but themselves. In fact, the pair’s determination to call out their “struggle” and “suffering” from their private jet about lifestyle is nothing but laughable.
In response, as always, the couple’s pointless and pathetic PR peddler, Omid Scobie, took to Twitter to leap to their defence. Ignoring many comments from his followers that pointed out that Time made Adolf Hitler their ‘Man of the Year’ in January 1939, Scobie celebrated the couple’s appearance on the cover. He went as far to laud the former Meghan Markle’s “confidence” and her husband as a “man secure enough in himself to not be intimidated by it” and yet again illustrated his inability to show any kind of journalistic impartiality.
The public, predictably, have heard quite enough. It is now time for the Duke and Duchess of Sussex to actually do something else: Time out and disappear.
Chef José Andrés claims the Duke and Duchess of Sussex “take risks to help communities in need” and suggests they have “been blessed through birth and talent, and burned by fame.” He suggests “it would be much safer to enjoy their good fortune and stay silent,” but neglects to realise that the pugnacious pair are the ones who’ve gone to war on others rather than others having gone to war on them.The former Meghan Markle is known for repeatedly slipping on metaphorical banana skins. Her and her drip of a husband seem incapable of realising the error of their ways and that with each and every move they make, they simply irritate the public and media more and more.
Prince Harry and Duchess Meghan have made this year’s #TIME100 Most Influential List: “In a world where everyone has an opinion about people they don’t know, the duke and duchess have compassion for the people they don’t know. They don’t just opine. They run toward the struggle.” pic.twitter.com/gPXRFBoNgU
How is it that in 2021 there are western media outlets still so uncomfortable with the sight of a woman showing confidence or a man secure enough in himself to not be intimidated by it? These hired body language experts are tripp👏🏻ing👏🏻 pic.twitter.com/1JHD9xAum5
New site Cold Dahl makes a mockery of Prince Andrew’s nonsensical gibberish about not sweating; its first video clip is a ‘must watch’
Prince Andrew allegedly doesn’t sweat. He supposedly doesn’t hug and he doesn’t recall wrapping his chubby fingers around the waist of Virginia Roberts at the home of the mucky madam Ghislaine Maxwell back in 2001. Allegedly, he claims, he was instead living it up in Pizza Express.
Yesterday, a relatively new site mocking this rotten royal named ‘Cold Dahl’ that is animated by ‘Beatrix Shotter’ – clearly a pun on the names of two famous authors of children’s books – shared an amusing video they’d made on YouTube. It is both amusing and witty.
The 1:41 minute segment features an adapted version of the infamous 2019 Emily Maitlis BBC Newsnight interview with the pugnacious prince ‘Randy Andy’ and is certainly well worth watching.
As ever, here is proof that the Duke of York has a morphed into one thing: A comedy car crash and a national embarrassment. Again today, we suggest that this “person of interest” now does the right thing and that is to head to America and answer the FBI’s questions.
Prince Andrew’s most ridiculous remarks
“I could have worse tags than ‘Airmiles Andy’ – although I don’t know what they are.”
“People say to me: ‘Would you like to swap your life with me for 24 hours? Your life must be very strange.’ But, of course, I have not experienced any other life. It’s not strange to me.”
“There’s a slight problem with the sweating because I have a peculiar medical condition which is that I don’t sweat or I didn’t sweat at the time and that was… was it… yes, I didn’t sweat at the time because I had suffered what I would describe as an overdose of adrenalin in the Falkland’s War when I was shot at and I simply… it was almost impossible for me to sweat. And it’s only because I have done a number of things in the recent past that I am starting to be able to do that again. So, I’m afraid to say that there’s a medical condition that says that I didn’t do it so therefore…”
“We can’t be certain as to whether or not that’s my hand on her whatever it is, left… left side … [of the photograph with Virginia Roberts] Nobody can prove whether or not that photograph has been doctored but I don’t recollect that photograph ever being taken.”
“I went [to Jeffrey Epstein’s house] with the sole purpose of saying to him that because he had been convicted, it was inappropriate for us to be seen together. And I had a number of people counsel me in both directions, either to go and see him or not to go and see him and I took the judgement call that because this was serious and I felt that doing it over the telephone was the chicken’s way of doing it. I had to go and see him and talk to him.”
“[Jeffrey Epstein’s house] was a convenient place to stay. I mean I’ve gone through this in my mind so many times. At the end of the day, with a benefit of all the hindsight that one can have, it was definitely the wrong thing to do. But at the time I felt it was the honorable and right thing to do and I admit fully that my judgment was probably colored by my tendency to be too honorable but that’s just the way it is.”
“I’ve always been told I was extremely well behaved as a kid.”
“If you’re a man it is a positive act to have sex with somebody. You have to … take some sort of positive action and so therefore if you try to forget it’s very difficult to try and forget a positive action and I do not remember anything.”
“It’s slightly complicated for people to grasp the idea of a head of state in human form.”
And finally, stating the bloody obvious: “Today is reality. Yesterday is history.”
A clearly photoshopped image of the Duke of York sweating profusely. Whatever he claims, however, other pictures in the past have genuinely shown the ex-bestie of the croaked paedophile Jeffrey Epstein perspiring.The Duke of York and his dopey live-in ex-wife were also pictured this week looking especially startled as they returned to Balmoral to hideout from the papers that Virginia Giuffre is attempting to have served upon the prince.
Matthew Steeples and Shaun Attwood to discuss the Maxwell, McCann and Menendez cases at CrimeCon UK 2021 this September
On 25th September at the Leonardo Royal Hotel in St Paul’s, London, editor-in-chief of The Steeple Times Matthew Steeples and True Crime Channel host Shaun Attwood will be amongst 80 speakers in attendance at the first London outing of CrimeCon, the world’s “number one true crime event.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-EvrJdWY1ko
Matthew Steeples and Shaun Attwood will focus on the current developments in the case against mucky madam Ghislaine Maxwell, but will also discuss matters relating to the Menendez brothers and ‘missing’ Madeleine McCann.To purchase a discounted ticket, use the code ATTWOOD.
Shaun Attwood and Matthew Steeples discuss the latest developments in some of the biggest stories in true crime. What’s in store for Ghislaine Maxwell? Is the Maddie McCann investigation a waste of money? Should the Menendez brothers be released?
Amongst other speakers present during the two day event will be the ex-chief crown prosecutor Nazir Afzal OBE, the forensic psychologist Kerry Daynes, the author Lynda La Plante, the broadcaster Anita Rani, the investigative journalist John Sweeney, the Don’t F**k With Cats star Deanna Thompson, the broadcaster Denise Welch and the investigative journalist Mark Williams-Thomas.
In addition, the conference will feature live shows, immersive experiences including crime scene recreations, a shopping area, drinks parties and a dinner.
Launched in the US in 2017, the gathering has previously “attracted thousands of visitors,” according to the Mirror. It “features criminologists, pathologists, detectives, documentary makers [and] podcasters” and all attendees must be over 18 years old.
To book tickets, click here. To get a discount, use the code ATTWOOD at purchase point.
Arrogant gas guzzling grabber Prince Andrew and his wack job live-in ex-wife commit further acts of arrogance; they simply will never learn
This week, yet again, ‘Randy Andy’ and his feckless wastrel wife ‘Fergie’ have gone and put their cloven hooves into the proverbial.
Firstly, on Monday, the Daily Express shared that the Daily Mail’s diary editor Richard Eden had condemned the Duke of York taking a convoy consisting of a Land Rover Range Rover, a Defender and a Discovery on his trip to Balmoral.
The paper reported:
“Speaking to Mail+ Palace Confidential, Richard Eden said: ‘We’ve heard a lot from his brother Prince Charles recently about the environment, as we know he’s a very, very strong campaigner against climate change.”
“Prince Andrew, for his visit with Fergie to Balmoral, he took not one, not two, but three SUVs, and obviously we wonder. The Palace wouldn’t comment at all but why does he need all these gas guzzling vehicles?”
“They wouldn’t say but the suggestion is still for his royal protection, but these are not police cars, these are with his personalised number plates, Prince Andrew’s cars.
“The fact he’s still getting tax-payer funded police protection when he hasn’t carried out any royal duties for almost two years and there doesn’t seem to be any real prospect he will be in the future, I’m afraid it’s outrageous.”
Going further, The Mail on Sunday’s diary editor Charlotte Griffiths quite rightly added: “He seems to want to do it on purpose to provoke his brother, we do know that Prince Andrew loves to provoke his brother. I mean, you almost think is this a wind up, it’s so bonkers.”
Continuing, yesterday, the Daily Express turned to an even more contentious alleged piece of news about the Duke of York’s wife, Sarah Ferguson.
For the paper, Isabella Marsans claimed: “The Duchess of York, 61, may be handed a portion of the Sussexes patronages, according to sources. Harry, 36, and Meghan, 40, stepped away from being working members of the Royal Family last year and moved to California.”
Given this deviant duo’s connections to the late paedophile Jeffrey Epstein and his currently incarcerated mucky madam sidekick Ghislaine Maxwell, both pieces of news yet again prove something about this caustic couple – they will never learn the art of humblese. Shame on them.
Why did Prince Andrew and his feckless wife need to take a convoy of three cars to Balmoral? Has this man no sense of responsibility towards environmental considerations alongside has inability to have ended his friendship with a paedophile without going to stay at his New York mansion?Elsewhere, last month, illustrating her sheer shamelessness, Sarah, Duchess of York posed for ‘Town & Country’ magazine in a series of photos. Each was accompanied by descriptions of the items she was sporting – and each item was outrageously accompanied by its pricing. For the live-in royal ex-wife to be so overtly commercial is simply tacky and tawdry.Yesterday also, ‘The Sun’ ludicrously suggested Sarah, Duchess of York is on the road to becoming “a TV mega mogul with the launch of her novel – amid hopes it could become the next Bridgerton.” A source told the paper: “An LA insider said: ‘Sarah believes that this book should be taken to the screen. She feels that the characters and plotlines are very strong, and that audiences at this time are lapping up this type of content. When her book deal came up, she secured the rights to co-produce a TV series and has been working with production houses in the pitching phrase. There have been discussions with networks and streamers with the premise that this series has a Bridgerton feel, and that Sarah plans more novels with these characters. There is huge optimism about this project. The book has gotten positive US feedback and she is well liked there.”
Prince Andrew is consistent in one regard: He repeatedly makes all situations he finds himself far worse. His 2019 interview with Emily Maitlis for the BBC was undoubtedly his lowest point to date, but that he continues to behave with arrogance just shows that he is completely out of touch with the need to behave appropriately and with dignity.
Mucky madam Ghislaine Maxwell has a meltdown and barricades herself in the conference room of the Metropolitan Detention Center
Late yesterday afternoon, the MailOnline reported that Ghislaine Maxwell had a meltdown and “tried to ‘barricade’ herself in the video conference room in [the Metropolitan Detention Center] prison with a cart of legal documents.”
In a report by Daniel Bates, it is claimed the mucky madam “was banned from bringing the cart in and was forced to carry materials from her cell to the conference room” and that prosecutors claimed she used a cart “to barricade the door to the VTC room, thereby preventing MDC staff from being able to access the room.”
They continued of the petulant alleged paedo:
“Because of the security threat posed by the use of the cart to barricade the door to the VTC room, the defendant is no longer permitted to bring the cart into the room.”
“Instead, the defendant may bring whatever materials she can carry into the room, and if she needs other materials during a particular meeting with counsel, she may leave the VTC room, retrieve those materials by hand, and then return to her meeting with counsel.”
Predictably, in response, Bobbi Sternheim, Maxwell’s bombastic lawyer, stated that her client “never” tried to block the door with the cart and did not stop guards getting in. She claimed prosecutors “cannot resist the opportunity to gratuitously cast Ghislaine Maxwell in a negative light while it defends the Metropolitan Detention Center at all costs.”
Maxwell, of course, has previous with regard to tempestuous antics and demanding behaviour. Aside from allegedly making her cell filthy and not flushing the lavatory, in August last year we reported that she had been moaning about not having a desk or email access.
Again now, we ask: “What do you want next Ghislaine? Krug on tap?”
Pictured top: Ghislaine Maxwell with major supporter of Joe Biden and Kamala Harris Laurene Powell Jobs. Billionaire Ms Powell Jobs was married to Steve Jobs between 1991 and his death in 2011.
Ghislaine Maxwell is used to having things her way and here she is pictured in her youth tapping away at an early computer. In January, the pension plundering ‘Bouncing Czech’s’ daughter demanded more access to laptop
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fg8ri4x0hj8
Life behind bars isn’t easy for anyone, but in the case of a woman used to luxury and nobody telling her “no” ever, it is certainly a situation that must have been hard to get used to. Given Jeffrey Epstein’s hideous henchwoman’s predilection for bullying and brashness, it is perfectly conceivable that she went rogue and blockaded herself in the prison conference room.Crusading author Kirby Sommers tweeted about the latest developments at the Metropolitan Detention Center, Brooklyn on Friday. To purchase a copy of her latest work, ‘Ghislaine Maxwell: An Unauthorized Biography,’ click here. It is a must read for anyone interested in this tawdry topic.Pension plundering Robert Maxwell once stated: “I have a beautiful daughter and she’s just like me.” Pictured here in a T-shirt – somewhat ironically captioned ‘Are we rich yet?’ – the temper tantrum prone robber baron and all-round bully’s aggressive antics have most certainly been inherited by his dangerously deviant daughter.If grubby Ghislaine had any sense, she’d start behaving herself and quit the tantrums. Her demanding antics and bad behaviour will not be looked upon favourably at sentencing if and when she likely gets sent down.
Showtime premiere new series titled ‘Gossip’ about the life of Cindy Adams of “only in New York, kids, only in New York” fame
New York born Cindy Adams is undoubtedly the queen of that city’s gossip scene and now her own story is being shown in a four-part Showtime series that began yesterday.
Titled, why, of course, Gossip, this “historical look at Adams’s singular life and work and a deep dive into how news is made; it follows her from her early years as a New York City beauty queen through her marriage to comedian Joey Adams and her life as a writer and confidante to the rich, famous, and infamous,” Town & Country reports.
Featuring the story of a woman lauded as “fearless” and “unafraid to ask any question or say anything she wants to say,” the series delves into what makes Adams’ columns for the New York Post – which she has penned since 1979 – “must reads” for so many.
Revered but also feared as someone who “could have you killed” and described as somebody to whom “you have to pay your respects, it’s not optional,” Adams has delved into many arenas over the years. Her loyalty to controversial friends – amongst them Hillary Clinton, Leona Helmsley, Imelda Marcos, Rupert Murdoch and Donald Trump – is a clear guiding force and of her Judge Judy Sheindlin remarked:
“[Cindy Adams is] a woman who loves with the same intensity as she hates. If you are within her circle of love, you can sleep easy knowing that she will do everything in her power to keep you safe. If you get on Cindy’s bad side, however, you better keep one eye open.”
Cindy Adams in her own words
“I have never lost an enemy.”
“You take me with all of my faults… If I had any!”
“Success has made failures of many men.”
“America loves an underdog.”
“New Yorkers are strong. Though makes it sounds like we’re not approachable and we’re rotten people, but we’re strong.”
“There are so many funny things that people say in New York. I mean, where else could anybody live? Sure, there are hassles. But that’s what it is, it’s New York. Where you wanna live – Arizona? Arkansas? I would kill myself.”
“Those of us who are not stupid, we learn, and I learned.”
“Here’s the thing: A lot of people know things, and they want to tell it.”
“Hugh Grant… Could we have a Loo Grant?”
“Shove Generation X.”
“People who don’t curse should never even mouth that four-letter word ‘houseguest.’”
Of the series, director-producer Jenny Carchman told ‘Variety’: “Everybody gossips, right? Everybody loves to do it. It feels good. It’s information that you have, and it gives you power. The point of this series is how to use that power with the information. It would be great if we appeal to a (really broad) audience and they watch it and learn about the history of the ‘New York Post’ and Donald Trump. But either way, the series is trying to take that word “gossip” and unpack it. Like, what is it actually? And I think where we come to is that the word is enormous power… [Cindy] liked the film. Listen, she’s unapologetic. She’s absolutely clear about her feelings and about her relationships. These are her friends. She is very loyal to her friends. They’ve done nothing wrong to her. She doesn’t feel the need to apologize for them or for their behavior. In fact, she was able to further her career by having access to these people. I think she feels like she’s telling it, like it is – from their point of view. She’s a reporter from their point of view.”Cindy Adams in her office.
