Category: EDITORIAL

Editorial comment from Matthew Steeples.

Our editor tells it like it is and he rarely minces his words

Randy Andy’s Right Royal Roasting

Facing a roasting that can only lead to further humiliation, Prince Andrew really should just get it over and go and face the FBI suggests Matthew Steeples

To be a fly on the wall in the breakfast room of the “happiest divorced couple in the world,” Prince Andrew and his live-in ‘lodger’ ex-wife Sarah, Duchess of York, this morning would be spellbindingly sickening.

With wall-to-wall bad news for the dastardly duo in the form of a civil lawsuit against the Pizza Express loving, non-sweating Duke of York from Virginia Giuffre (née Roberts) filed yesterday in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, lacking in diplomatic immunity ‘Randy Andy’s’ worst fears have finally been brought to the fore.

For the renegade non-active royal, there are now two options, but each will clearly result only in further humiliation and nothing but a right royal roasting. First, he could ignore the claim and thus face judgment in absentia. In doing so, he would be unable to offer evidence to attempt to try to prove the sordid allegations against him to be false. This could also potentially cause a diplomatic between Britain and the USA, something that would result in embarrassment for his mother and wider family.

Second, the Duke of York could go and face the suit and risk being hauled in to answer the FBI’s questions also. In doing so, he’d take the chance of potentially being prosecuted “if there is suspicion of criminal behaviour,” according to the Daily Mail. “He could ‘take the 5^th’ and invoke his right against self-incrimination, and refuse to answer questions,” the paper’s Harriet Alexander and Daniel Bates this morning continued, though this would only raise suspicions about his conduct during his friendship with Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.

Elsewhere, in a statement to ABC News, Giuffre announced:

“I am holding Prince Andrew accountable for what he did to me.”

“The powerful and the rich are not exempt from being held responsible for their actions. I hope that other victims will see that it is possible not to live in silence and fear, but one can reclaim her life by speaking out and demanding justice.”

“I did not come to this decision lightly. As a mother and a wife, my family comes first. I know that this action will subject me to further attacks by Prince Andrew and his surrogates.”

“But I knew that if I did not pursue this action, I would be letting them and victims everywhere down.”

This morning, I join those saluting the courage of Virginia Giuffre to make a public stand in spite of the powerful forces that stand against her. That she has filed a lawsuit finally brings a chance for her allegations to be proven to be true or lies and if he had an ounce of sense, Prince Andrew would finally do the decent thing: Go to America and face the bloody music.

Analysis of the 2001 photograph of Prince Andrew with his “chubby fingers” around the waist of the then Virginia Roberts at Ghislaine Maxwell’s Kinnerton Street, Belgravia mews house has repeatedly shown that it looks genuine. The royal, however, continues to suggest the image likely fake and has stated he has “no recollection” of ever meeting her and argued: “I can absolutely categorically tell you [what she suggests] never happened.”

Virginia L. Giuffre filed her suit against Prince Andrew, Duke of York (AKA Andrew Albert Christian Edward) in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on Monday.

The Duke of York’s associations with the now croaked paedophile Jeffrey Epstein and the currently incarcerated alleged mucky madam Ghislaine Maxwell to date have caused him embarrassment and brought mockery on him. Now, thanks to Giuffre’s lawsuit, it could cause him a hell of a lot more problems.

August 10, 2021
Clear ‘Orf Cressida

Matthew Steeples suggests that Met Police chief Dame Cressida Dick is not fit for purpose and must finally now resign

Dame Cressida Dick DBE, QPM shouldn’t be in charge of a bus ticket, let alone the nation’s capital’s police force. Here is a woman who spends her time moaning about the BBC’s Line of Duty drama series – which she claimed “absolutely outraged” her – rather than actually solving crime; frankly, she’s proved as useful as a chocolate teapot and now, today, I again call for her to just go.

In September last year, when we revealed that an escaped prisoner couldn’t get himself arrested in spite of handing himself in to the Met Police on seven, yes SEVEN occasions, we remarked “it’s long been known that Dame Cressida couldn’t police a pissup in a brewery,” but in the time since things have gotten worse at the force headed by this totally inept and clearly inane waste of space.

Aside from having been in charge of the operation in which a totally innocent man, Jean Charles de Menezes, was shot dead due to gross incompetence on the part of her officers in 2005 and given what The Sun termed “feeble” responses to “lawless protests by Extinction Rebellion and others,” the Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis’ response to the conviction of one of her own officers has been utterly showing of the fact that she truly isn’t fit for purpose.

Armed officer Wayne Couzens – who was indicatively nicknamed by colleagues at The Met ‘The Rapist’ yet nothing was done about him – has now pleaded guilty to the murder of Sarah Everard in March. How did his boss respond? With what The Sun quite rightly called out as “vapid assurances [that] lessons [have] been learned across the board.” Going further they added: “The people to blame for this predator being on the streets should be held to account,” whilst we add: SHAME ON HER.

Condemned also by the crusading blog From The Hornets Nest also last week as “presiding over our crime-riven city” and protected by a “pernicious, masonic like influence,” any respect there ever was for Dame Cressida Dick is well and truly gone. She now needs to finally do the only thing left to her: RESIGN and clear ‘orf.

Dick has also been criticised over the botched the Metropolitan Police’s handling over investigations into child sex abuse, their fruitless £30 million investigation into the murder of private investigator Daniel Morgan (pictured) and her force’s handling over the use of stop and search of those of black and other ethnic minority backgrounds.

In 2018, this ludicrous woman blamed rising crime in London on social media rather than a lack of proper policing. She told Fiona Hamilton and Rachel Sylvester of ‘The Times’: “There’s definitely something about the impact of social media in terms of people being able to go from slightly angry with each other to ‘fight’ very quickly… It [social media] makes it harder for people to cool down. I’m sure it does rev people up.”

The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis’ decision to refuse to stand down over police handling of a vigil for the late marketing executive Sarah Everard – murdered in cold blood by one of her very own officers – provided proof of her arrogance. “No, I’m not considering my position,” she curtly commented.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=elSZtYkRQyY
After the shooting of the entirely innocent Jean Charles de Menezes in 2005 by her officers, Dick did anything but take responsibility. She remarked of it: “The events of that day stay with one; I think about it quite often. It was a traumatic period. It was an awful time for so many people, obviously and most of all Jean Charles’s family, the people who were there when it happened, the firearms officers, the surveillance officers.” In response, de Menezes family called for her to be brought to book and quite justifiably later opposed her subsequent promotion.

Summing up how out-of-touch with reality she truly is, Dame Cressida stated of her force: “We’re not institutionally corrupt.” Her comments came after the failed £30 million investigation into the murder of Daniel Morgan was quite rightly condemned due to those involved most definitely being aided and abetted by corrupt Metropolitan Police officers. It is now time for her to consider her position and RESIGN.

July 14, 2021
Stop Property Propping Up Politicians

As both Labour and the Tories even more so come under fire for taking millions from the property sector, it is time for stricter regulation of such ‘giving’ suggests Matthew Steeples

In December last year, we shared that a quarter of all donations to the Conservatives came from the property industry in general since Boris Johnson became leader and now, today, the Guardian went further and revealed that an astonishing fifth of all donations to the party have come from the residential element of that sector in the last decade.

Aside from the Housing Secretary Robert Jenrick having deservedly come under criticism for helping along the planning processes for extremely lucrative development schemes of rich donors such as Richard Desmond previously, the anti-corruption Transparency International UK group has now highlighted that “the Conservatives received £60.8m in donations from individuals and companies related to substantial property interests” between 2010 and 2020. Going further, they added: “Of property-related donations to all parties, 80% went to the Tories.”

The report noted: “While we have seen insufficient evidence to prove beyond reasonable doubt any direct quid pro quo arrangements of donations for decisions, this dependence creates a real risk of aggregative corruption, whereby the actions and judgments of ministers are incentivised by their party’s financial ties to interest groups in this policy area.”

Aside from describing this as “of serious concern,” Transparency International UK’s policy director suggested lobbying efforts by the construction industry on the Conservative government was “woefully opaque.”

Of this, the Guardian remarked: “In just three years from 2017 to 2020, the research uncovered, ministers held 669 meetings with 894 different interest groups to discuss housing issues, but in more than 40% of cases departmental information described the subjects being discussed only as ‘housing’ or ‘planning.’”

With Labour under fire also after “beleaguered” deputy leader Angela Rayner was exposed for taking a £10,000 donation from a residential developer, the stench of the power of commercial and residential construction companies and estate agents over the current batch of politicians at Westminster has become especially pungent.

It is time at the very least for an investigation into the over-reliance of political parties on funding from this sector and it is frankly time for stricter regulation of what, when and how such money can be given (and the ‘obligations’ that go with it).

Housing Secretary Robert Jenrick’s acceptance of donations from developers should be a “restricted zone” given his position, Matthew Steeples argues.

Labour’s Angela Rayner also has been happy to accept donations from residential developers in spite of having a pop at the Tories. In March 2020, she took £10,000 from Manchester based Intro Developments, a firm that converts office blocks into flats.

Boris Johnson is equally happy to hang out with porn baron turned property developer. He should now be asked: “What first attracted you to the multi-millionaire Richard Desmond, Boris?”

July 12, 2021
Carrie PRs On
The Prime Minister’s puppet mistress Carrie Johnson’s latest PR spin campaign yet again illustrates her deviancy suggests Matthew Steeples

Let’s be frank: Carrie Symonds (AKA ‘Princess Nut Nuts,’ ‘Carrie Antoinette’ and ‘Costly Carrie’) is famous simply for being Boris Johnson’s latest baby mama, but now she’s well and truly upping her antics and most definitely wants a hell of a lot more.

This weekend, this wine chucking wench and one half of ‘The Convenient Catholic Couple’ used the G7 summit to implant not only herself but also her child firmly into a convention where no other politician foisted their brats into the photo ops. Here was a woman with one agenda: Making herself the centre of attention.

In addition, the new Mrs Boris Johnson plainly made a point of getting Downing Street spin doctors to share that she hadn’t actually bought costly clothes, but instead hired them. Was this something the public actually needed to know at an event that was meant to be about discussing global issues? I think not, but Carrie, desperate to rid herself of the ‘Antoinette’ moniker she so deserves after bingeing on expensive Daylesford delicacies, will PR on regardless.

What’s “in” for Carrie Symonds…
- “Chatty rat” Henry Newman singing ABBA and dancing the tango with this particularly bonkers bestie.
- Dining dashes to Daylesford (courtesy of ‘Lady Doors To Manual’ Carole Bamford’s credit card).
- “Borrowed clothing” to suggest she’s “ordinary.”
- Pushing her child into any photo opportunity possible so as to make a point that her kid is more important than her hubby’s other legitimate and illegitimate brats.
What’s “out” for Carrie Symonds…
- Anything from “nightmarish” John Lewis. Too “Theresa Maybe Not” for our Carrie, of course.
- Anything connected with her number one hater, Dominic Cummings, can take a trip to Barnard Castle via a visit to SpecSavers.
- Anybody who dares to criticise the antics of her out of control dog, Dilyn will make her “go crackers” … Don’t dare make Carrie “furious” with even a single remark – even if the dastardly dog pisses all over a visitor’s handbag.
- Any talk of her associations with Ghislaine Maxwell and far right ex-boyfriends involved in the Traditional Britain Group.
In December 2020, ‘The Steeple Times’ highlighted: “Whilst Denis Thatcher happily took a back seat and parked himself in a corner with a stiff G&T and Norma Major steered clear of anything to do with curried eggs, Symonds is increasingly showing herself as the Lynda Snell of Downing Street.”

Aside from her obsession with attention, the former Carrie Symonds counts working for a charity that was funded by the mucky madam Ghislaine Maxwell on her somewhat dodgy CV.

The then Carrie Symonds with her then boyfriend Oliver Haiste (sometimes spelt ‘Haste’), an alleged hoaxer of fake news about Russia according to the BBC. Of his then “public relations specialist” on-off lover, the ‘Mail on Sunday’ declared: “his own three-year relationship with the young woman at the centre of Britain’s latest political storm involved an electrifying dose of dramatic and often fiery conflict… ‘We had quite a tumultuous relationship,’ he admits today. ‘I found when times were good with Carrie they were great – they were fantastic. When times were bad they were awful. It was a highly passionate relationship. And I don’t mean that in a salacious, physical sense. I mean in terms of emotional context – very emotionally charged. It’s the most up and down relationship I have had,’ Haiste continues, choosing his words carefully. Today, describing their relationship for the first time, he paints an intriguing portrait of a ‘high-octane’ partnership with a woman as passionate as she is intelligent.”

The Prime Minister’s spouse previously dated a man associated with spreading fake news whom was also involved in the Traditional Britain Group – a sick, far right organisation that has expressed a desire to hang Baroness Lawrence, the mother of a murder victim, from a tree. ‘Britain’s 3rd Loose Woman’ also partook in a play where she dressed as a crack whore whilst at university. Is this someone the nation really wants representing it on the world stage?
June 13, 2021
Note Nothing New McCann
As the ‘Mirror’ publish yet another “nothing new” story about ‘missing’ Madeleine McCann, Matthew Steeples suggests: “Why not instead allocate some coverage to other missing people?”

In July last year, the MailOnline ran a ludicrous story suggesting that “a new witness has come forward to claim that Madeleine McCann is alive and living with a German family on the Algarve.” They did not name this supposedly beady eyed individual, but suggested “she saw the by-now teenager in a supermarket just 40 miles from where she disappeared speaking German.”

Unsurprisingly like most ‘leads’ in this curious case, this far-fetched suggestion never resulted in any further developments and now, this morning, it’s been the turn of the Mirror to muddy the waters yet again.

Note Nothing New McCann 2021 – Gerry and Kate McCann pictured out running in the days after the ‘disappearance’ of their daughter. Soon thereafter, claiming the Portuguese police were “setting them up,” the couple fled back to Britain.

Probably prompted by those seeking to get further funds to top up the fast approaching £13 million of public money wasted on a case caused by a couple who left their three young children unattended whilst living it up at a restaurant, the Mirror reported: “Kate and Gerry McCann still hope [their daughter] will be found alive, 14 years after she vanished on holiday in Portugal in 2007, days before her fourth birthday.”

Aside from banging on about a note left in a staff message book at the resort, the paper shared that Mr and Mrs McCann have recently declared on Facebook: “We love you and we’re waiting for you and we’re never going to give up.”

This morning, I counter: “Why don’t the Mirror and MailOnline and others stop printing such drivel and why don’t they instead help the thousands of other families of missing people who get little to no assistance instead?”

Missing Madeleine – Questions STILL without Answers

Many questions about what happened on the evening of the disappearance of Madeleine McCann remain. Some that have been highlighted by the press and discussed online include:
- Why did Kate McCann refuse to answer 48 questions put to her by the Portuguese police?
- Why were certain records of phone calls on the evening of the disappearance “whoosh-clunked” from the memories of the phones of Mr and Mrs McCann and the ‘Tapas 7’?
- Why did a British sniffer dog sense the smell of a corpse in a cupboard in the apartment from which Madeleine McCann disappeared?
- Why did a sniffer dog also supposedly sense the smell of a corpse in a vehicle hired by the couple a month after the disappearance of their daughter?
- Why did Mr and Mrs McCann go jogging and play tennis in the days after their daughter’s disappearance?
- Was it acceptable for Mr and Mrs McCann’s mortgage to be paid by the fund established to search for their missing daughter?
Martin Allen vanished without a trace in London on 5th November 1979 aged just 15. Though his brother, Kevin Allen, has kept the case in the public eye as much as he can, he gets little to no help from the Metropolitan Police. Again today, I ask: “Why isn’t money from the public purse allocated to solving this case and thousands like it and why, instead, has fast approaching £13 million been allocated to a case that has not been solved in 14 years?”

Luke Durbin disappeared aged just 19 in Suffolk in May 2006. In spite of his mother’s tireless campaign to attempt to find her vanished son, why don’t the police devote more resources to the search for him?

Ben Needham, then aged just 1, disappeared on the Greek island of Kos on 24th July 1991. He has been missing for over 29 year and in the time since his mother, Kerry Needham, has shockingly come under attack from supporters of the family of Madeleine McCann. Of this in October 2015, she commented: “It feels like a personal attack on me. It is deeply, deeply hurtful. I have myself had massive amounts of slanderous abuse from supporters of the McCann campaign in the past but I have never taken that personally. It’s freedom of speech. But it is getting the names of two missing children out there which is really important.”
May 22, 2021
Menendez Take on TikTok

As the Menendez brothers case goes viral courtesy of their newfound TikTok supporters, it is time for their case to be reassessed and their convictions reduced to manslaughter suggests Matthew Steeples

Brothers Erik and Lyle Menendez were imprisoned in 1996 for the murders of their parents on 20^th August 1989 after two trials and in spite of the fact that their relatives testified to the sexual and emotional abuse they suffered.

Featured today on the Fox 11 channel in a 6:11-minute segment, news that this shocking story – which was brought back to public attention primarily by the crusading work of the journalist Robert Rand and the juror Hazel Thornton – has once again gone viral is illustration of the power of the ‘TikTok generation,’ who have in recent months shared thousands of posts, footage and photos relating to the case on social media.

Calling themselves ‘Menendez Defenders,’ these TikTok using youngsters – many of whom were not even born at the time that the brothers shot their decidedly deviant parents – have lobbied amongst others the Governor of California, Gavin Newsom, to claim that the justice system “got it wrong” and all the brothers wanted was for the “abuse to stop.”

Speaking to Fox 11 of two brothers cruelly kept apart for 22 years until 2018, Robert Rand remarked:

“Erik Menendez wrote a paragraph in a letter to his cousin Andy Kano, that his father was still molesting him at the age of 17 and that he didn’t know what to do about it. And he said in this letter that he was afraid every night when he heard his father coming down the hallway.”

“I think in the 27 years since the Menendez brothers’ trials, society has evolved and changed so much. And if the Menendez trial was held today in 2021, I absolutely believe the resolution would have been manslaughter and not murder, and that is the way this case should have ended.”

Previously, on Instagram in February this year, Rand stated:

“Any announcement about the filing of a new appeal will be coming from the brothers themselves and their appeal attorneys.”

“In an online chat on the Justice Watchdog YouTube channel on 27^th December 2020, Erik Menendez said the brothers would be ‘filing a new appeal in 2021.’”

“One threshold for reopening an appeal is to make a filing that includes new evidence that was not included in the 1990s trials. An example of this type of evidence could be the letter Erik Menendez wrote to Andy Cano in December 1988. The Andy Cano letter has NEVER been part of any court proceedings before.”

“I remain hopeful that Erik and Lyle Menendez will file a new appeal in the future.”

“Even if a new appeal is filed in 2021, it’s unlikely that there would be any quick resolution of the case or the appeal filing. Court proceedings are frequently slow paced.”

“After 31 years, we’d all like to see Erik and Lyle Menendez released from prison and sent home to their families.”

“The reality is that the appeal process is more a marathon than a sprint. We’re all going to have to hang in there and keep supporting the brothers.”

Going further in reply to a question asked by another Instagram user, he subsequently added:

“I am 100% certain that any new potential new Menendez appeal will be filed on behalf of BOTH brothers. Even though Erik mentioned he’s filing a new appeal in 2021, the timing of the filing will be determined by the brothers’ appeal attorneys.”

“I understand you are all anxious to learn more about the appeal, but please remember that this is a highly sensitive and time consuming legal process that will remain confidential until it is filed.”

Today, yet again, I join those calling for a reexamination of the convictions of Erik and Lyle Menendez and call upon Gavin Newsom and others to do the decent thing: Help set these victims of abuse back on the path to the freedom they deserve after 25 years of incarceration.

Menendez Take on TikTok 2021 – Today, Fox 11 revisited the case and explored the growing involvement of ‘TikTok generation’ youngsters in campaigning for justice for two victims of emotional and sexual abuse, Erik and Lyle Menendez.

Menendez Take on TikTok 2021 – Erik and Lyle Menendez with their late parents, sexual and emotional abusers José and Kitty.

Three months after this tweet, there are over 800 million views of #MenendezBrothers videos on TikTok!#JusticeforErikandLyle https://t.co/LO2Os4L98f https://t.co/0sVvjKhHP3
— Rob Rand Wants Justice for the Menendez Brothers (@MenendezRand) May 13, 2021

Menendez Take on TikTok 2021 – Robert Rand shared also news that there have been over 800 million views of #MenendezBrothers videos on TikTok this morning.

May 13, 2021
Maxwell Delayed

Matthew Steeples suggests that Ghislaine Maxwell’s trial being delayed is not surprising given new charges against the mucky madam; it is now time Prince Andrew spoke to the FBI, he adds

After banging on about her ‘black eye’ and her lawyers having had shared an undated image of a woman who shouldn’t be posing for pictures given she’s incarcerated anyway, the disgraced socialite Ghislaine Maxwell has finally secured a ‘win’ after her trial was given “a short continuance until the fall of 2021 to allow the defence to prepare for the additional charges brought.”

The fact of the matter in this development, however, is that the new charges brought against Maxwell recently not only extend the timeframe in question from 1994 to 1997 to 1994 to 2004 – key to the period in which the mucky madam was especially involved with the likes of Prince Andrew – but also increased her number of “minor” accusers from 3 to 4 victims. Here, now, we have before us a wicked wastrel of a woman facing a likely far worse fate and, frankly, thus, a small extension to allow her to “prepare” can be considered reasonable.

In other legal correspondence yesterday, the Honorable Alison J. Nathan stated “the Court declines to take further action at this time” in response to Maxwell’s lawyers claiming that paperwork supposedly destined for their client had been interfered with by her jailors. Dismissing yet more distraction technique by the ‘Bouncing Czech’s’ deviant daughter, Nathan also added that the trial delay must be “no longer than necessary” and after ordering both sides to quickly work towards a new proposed trial date quite rightly added:

“No [further] additional delay is necessary or in the interests of justice… Importantly, any victims and the public more broadly have a strong interest in trial proceeding without undue delay.”

Pictured top: Ghislaine Maxwell looking smug. No doubt, today, she’s feeling such at having her trial delayed, but isn’t she just delaying the inevitable? Someone sane, would seek a plea deal, but this mendacious minx has the same attitude as her fraud father and will remain arrogant to the end.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T0HuM8Sg9u0&t=1790s
Maxwell Delayed – On Friday, I appeared on Shaun Attwood’s YouTube channel to discuss Ghislaine Maxwell’s ‘black eye’ and other recent developments in the case. Also featured was author, sex abuse survivor and advocate Kirby Sommers and a gentleman named Charlie Robinson.

Maxwell Delayed – Now, after a period of mourning for his late father, it is jolly well time that ‘Randy Andy’ faced the music and went to answer the questions of the FBI about his involvement with his ‘bestie’ Ghislaine Maxwell and the late paedophile Jeffrey Epstein. On Saturday, the ‘Daily Star’ reported that the “Queen [is] ‘trapped in Catch 22’ with Prince Andrew ahead of Ghislaine Maxwell trial” and reported royal commentator Daniela Elser claimed: “Her Majesty is in ‘dangerous territory’ regarding how [she] manages the fallout of the Duke of York’s ties to the disgraced late financier and his alleged accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell.” Elser added: “The public wants to see Andrew disciplined and forced to pay more of a price for his abysmal choices however having lost his royal job, patronages and reputation what else is there to take away? Short of Her Majesty forcing him to mow the acres and acres (literally) of palace lawn every week or pushing him out of a speeding Range Rover in front of the US Embassy and leaving him to the FBI, royal hands are tied.”

Maxwell Delayed – Ghislaine Maxwell used to pose naked at Jeffrey Epstein’s mucky mansion in Palm Beach; now after supposedly faking photos at burger joints, the alleged vegan is posing with black eyes. How times change for this daughter of the pension plunderer Robert Maxwell.

Maxwell Delayed – Last week, this not-seen-before image of Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein with Bill Clinton emerged. Given the multiple interactions between the former POTUS and the deviant duo, Clinton must, like Prince Andrew, be squeamish about what will be said about his ‘involvement’ at any forthcoming trial.

Maxwell Delayed – Responding to the delay to Maxwell’s trial, Kirby Sommers tweeted: “This ‘trial’ is going to go sideways.”

Maxwell Delayed – Going further, Sommers added: “[Her] legal strategy is to wear down the prosecution. Wear down the victims… And try to get out of jail. No way she’s releasing names. And no way does she want to stand trial.”

Maxwell Delayed – Referencing another element to the case, Sommers linked to a ‘Maza Inside’ article about a former friend of Maxwell who’ll be giving evidence against the alleged mucky madam. She quoted that ex-friend as saying: “[Maxwell] told me she could get into anybody’s pants and that girls are like candy.” Going further the unnamed “wealthy Californian woman” added: “This woman was worse than Jeffrey Epstein. She has no conscience. I wondered about a lot of things with her, sometimes.”

Maxwell Delayed – Elsewhere on Twitter, echoing the late Caroline Aherne’s words to Debbie McGee in character as ‘Mrs Merton’ Malcolm Finch told his 4,200 followers: “Peter Mandelson used to spend his time hanging around Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell’s Palm Beach mansion. I wonder what attracted Peter Mandelson to billionaire Jeffrey Epstein?” In May 2020, ‘The Steeple Times’ reported on the late Paul Daniels’ wife Ms McGee “boasting about her connections to ‘Randy Andy’” and in June that year we also explored the somewhat curious relationship between ‘Prince of Perv’ Epstein, ‘Prince of Darkness’ Mandelson and ‘Princess of Pugnacious’ Maxwell.

May 4, 2021
Matthew Steeples on Stuart Lubbock’s murder on ‘Shaun Attwood’s True Crime Channel’

Editor of ‘The Steeple Times’ Matthew Steeples appears on ‘Shaun Attwood’s True Crime Channel’ to discuss the latest arrest relating to the 2001 murder of Stuart Lubbock at the home of Michael Barrymore as well as a little more about Ghislaine Maxwell’s case also

On Wednesday night this week, I returned to Shaun Attwood’s popular Patreon channel to briefly discuss that day’s developments in the case of the 2001 murder of Stuart Lubbock at the home of the deservedly since disgraced entertainer Michael Barrymore.

Watched by over 3,700 people since being uploaded to Attwood’s YouTube channel this morning, what I truly believe needs to be considered here is that Terry Lubbock, a man tragically now facing death and suffering with terminal cancer, has tirelessly campaigned for justice whilst Barrymore has shamelessly sought simply to revive his career in the 20 years since what happened on 31^st March 2001.

An 11:04 segment follows and in it I also discuss Ghislaine Maxwell’s involvement in the Cash & Rocket rally and briefly mention my interest in Jeremy Bamber’s latest “fresh hopes” after launching a new legal challenge last week and the case of the Menendez brothers in California also.

Follow Matthew Steeples on Twitter at @M_Steeples and Shaun Attwood at @shaunattwood.

Support Shaun Attwood’s work by joining him on Patreon by clicking here.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-1wRAvqXOos&t=34s

Matthew Steeples on Stuart Lubbock’s murder on ‘Shaun Attwood’s True Crime Channel’ – Yesterday, in the wake of the latest arrest in the case of the 2001 murder of Stuart Lubbock at the home of Michael Barrymore, ‘The Sun’ published an article titled: “FORMER PARTNER: Who is Michael Barrymore’s ex-partner Jonathan Kenney?” Though police have not named the 50-year-old man they arrested, of the 9 present that fateful night, the only one who is now 50 years old is drag queen turned estate agent turned driving instructor turned coach driver Mr Kenney.

Matthew Steeples on Stuart Lubbock’s murder on ‘Shaun Attwood’s True Crime Channel’ – After sharing our article about the Lubbock family’s attempts to seek a second inquest into the murder at the home of Michael Barrymore on 31st March 2001, we received a touching tweet from the ex-wife of the victim, Stuart Lubbock, Sue Homan. It read: “Thank you. You are the only online news that said ‘Stuart Lubbock’ in the headline.” Responding Matthew Steeples remarks: “It is time that innocent victims were remembered ahead of those potentially linked to their deaths.”

March 19, 2021
Matthew Steeples on Maxwell on ‘Shaun Attwood’s True Crime Channel’

Editor of ‘The Steeple Times’ Matthew Steeples appears on ‘Shaun Attwood’s True Crime Channel’ to discuss developments in the case against mucky madam Ghislaine Maxwell

Last Wednesday, I was interviewed by Shaun Attwood on his ‘True Crime’ podcast. It featured first on Patreon and was yesterday made available on YouTube to his channel’s 665,000 subscribers and the wider public also.

Watched by over 20,000 people in less than 24 hours and liked by 1,100 of them already, the 35:48-minute feature focused on discussion of my research into Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein’s curious property transactions in London and America, but extended to discussion of the mucky madam’s spokesman and PR peddler Brian Basham also.

Last night, I returned to the channel – where previous guests have included The Goonies and The Lost Boys star Corey Feldman – for a slightly briefer chat about yesterday’s The Steeple Times story about Ghislaine Maxwell’s involvement in the Cash & Rocket car rally. I also spoke about the breaking news of the latest arrest in the shocking case of the 2001 murder of Stuart Lubbock at the home of the since disgraced entertainer Michael Barrymore. We will share that footage also when it is available.

Follow Matthew Steeples on Twitter at @M_Steeples and Shaun Attwood at @shaunattwood.

Support Shaun Attwood’s work by joining him on Patreon by clicking here.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JbjrFWbjmCY

Matthew Steeples on Maxwell on ‘Shaun Attwood’s True Crime Channel’ – Earlier this week Ian Maxwell released this photograph of himself with his sister Ghislaine Maxwell and their five other living siblings Anne, Christine, Isabel, Kevin and Philip. It was taken on what would have been the birthday of their late robber baron father, Robert.

March 18, 2021
A Call To Clegg
Matthew Steeples calls on Sir Nick Clegg to listen to the 36,500 people who’ve signed our Change.org petition seeking giraffe slayer Merelize van der Merwe being banned from Facebook

Former leader of the Liberal Democrats turned head global PR man for Facebook The Right Honourable Sir Nicholas Clegg has been getting a lot of stick of late.

Once considered a “great communicator” but a bit of a poodle to his coalition government partner, David Cameron, Clegg was meant to turnaround Facebook’s reputation in the wake of the Cambridge Analytica scandal, but instead last week was branded: “Clegg, the pampered prince of PR” by The Times and “the Prince Harry of politics” by the Daily Mail.

Now, today, I have an idea for Sir Nick Clegg that could help reverse his bad fortune of late and that is to listen to the 36,500 people who’ve signed our Change.org petition seeking to ban Merelize van der Merwe, a wicked woman whose husband bought her the ‘opportunity’ to massacre a giraffe as a Valentine’s Day present, from posting her gruesome content on the pages of the social media organisation he works for.

That van der Merwe was even able to share graphic images and a video even of this ‘kill’ on Facebook is frankly outrageous and today I ask Sir Nick:
- Is publishing barbaric actions of this nature something that you think is acceptable on a site used by millions across the globe?
- Don’t you think it is time to ban this wicked wench and those like her from using Mark Zuckerberg’s medium for their personal pleasure and profit also?
Elsewhere on Change.org, 19,100 people have signed our petition seeking to ban the bear slaying barbarian Larysa Switlyk from Instagram, a company bought by Facebook in 2012 for £760 million ($1 billion). Perhaps Sir Nick, couldn’t you have a word there too?

Sign our Change.org petition seeking Facebook ban Merelize van der Merwe by clicking here.

Sign our Change.org petition seeking Instagram ban Larysa Switlyk by clicking here.

Follow Matthew Steeples on Twitter at @M_Steeples.

A Call To Clegg – Sir Nick Clegg pictured with Facebook founder and Instagram owner Mark Zuckerberg.

A Call To Clegg – Sir Nick Clegg once posed next to the logo of a charity called Millie’s Trust. It featured a giraffe and though he plainly wanted to show support for that, now he should show support for living giraffes and support the 36,500 people demanding giraffe slayer Merelize van der Merwe be banned from the pages of the social media company he is currently paid £2.7 million per year to work for.

A Call To Clegg – Merelize van der Merwe has 99,000 followers on her “public figure” Facebook page. On it, she shares images of herself massacring amongst other animals elephants, hippos, lions and leopards. How is it acceptable that she is allowed to post such on a social media website, Sir Nick?

A Call To Clegg – Larysa Switlyk has 99,000 followers on her Instagram page. On it, she shares imagery of herself massacring amongst other animals alligators, bears, goats, hippos and peacocks. She even once posed in a field in the UK with a blood covered sex toy and the body of a sheep she’d shot. How is it acceptable that she is allowed to post such on a social media website, Sir Nick?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5EhqeZ0vYJ4&feature=emb_logo
A Call To Clegg – Viewer caution advised: Merelize van der Merwe posted this video of herself slaughtering a giraffe in Limpopo, South Africa on 24^th February. It has been viewed by over 3,000 people and unsurprisingly resulted in international outrage. It is now time that Facebook put a stop to this deranged deviant profiting from her sickening activities and it would do the social media giant utterly no harm to send her to social media Siberia.
March 2, 2021