Category: True Crime

Moron of the Moment – Amanda Platell

Paedophile and sex offender apologist Amanda Platell’s claims that the BBC “conned” her into an interview about the royals are beyond laughable

Always angry Australian Amanda Platell is someone who never owns her own mistakes.

The very worst example of acid tongued harpy Platell’s errors has to be coming out in support of her “kind and generous… dear friend Rolf Harris” in April 2013 in spite of it being clear he was nothing but a rotten paedophile, but in the years since she failed to learn that that was an easily identifiable error. In September 2020, she stepped-up her awful antics and used her Daily Mail column to claim the grubby groper and now ex-MP Charlie Elphicke was being subjected to “blatant injustice” after his conviction.

Elsewhere, in March 2014, this crackpot crazy used the very same platform to bizarrely claim “the real gay marriage bigots are its intolerant supporters” and in May that year ridiculously remarked that she’d “run out of sympathy” for the Duchess of Cambridge. Apparently, here is someone who doesn’t even realise that said member of the royal family frankly wouldn’t give two hoots about what she thinks then, now or ever.

In September 2019, bitter broad Platell turned to belittling black people by claiming “blacking-up” was just a bit of fun and that when she did it she was only “chided” by her father because she’d taken “his last tin of shoe polish.” Now, today, in the wake of her appearance on the BBC’s The Princes And The Press she’s now claiming Amol Rajan “utterly conned” her.

“Clearly, being party to such a calumny was not what I signed up for when I submitted myself to at least two hours of filmed conversation… I should have known better… I’m deeply ashamed to be associated with The Princes And The Press and feel let down by Amol Rajan, who I believe misled me” raged Platell in her Daily Mail column this morning.

The former press secretary to William Hague turned poison pen failed, however, to share how much she’d been paid to participate in both the first episode – which aired on Monday – and the second which follows on 8^th December. In doing so, this ridiculous ranter showed herself as just one thing: An utter bloody berk.

Pictured top – Amanda Platell with her “old friend” Rolf Harris. In 2014, ‘Two Little Boys’ singer Harris was sentenced to five years and nine months in prison on twelve counts of indecent assault on female victims and stripped of the many honours he’d been awarded during his career.

Platell is a fan of both the convicted Australian paedophile Rolf Harris and his off-the-scale weird chum Sir Cliff Richard.

She has also ludicrously come out in support of the “I’m a naughty Tory” MP turned convicted sex offender and groper Charlie Elphicke’s sentence having been reduced. Ludicrously of the disgraced politician and his replacement as MP for Dover (whom just happens to be his very own wife, Natalie), Plattell remarked: “I cannot help wondering whether, had Elphicke not been a high-profile Tory MP, he would have been treated so harshly. My worry is that this disproportionate punishment feeds into the notion that all women are victims who live in constant fear of sexual assault, and all men villains. We are not, they are not. And a woman such as Natalie Elphicke who stands up against such blatant injustice should be applauded, not pilloried.”

Amol Rajan was condemned by the angry Australian as having “conned her” and “reduced [her two hours of contributions to his programme] to less than two minutes of selective quotes.” She claimed “I was being used to bolster Meghan’s case” and added she was “misled” and “badly treated.”

In addition to penning puerile poison for the ‘Daily Mail,’ here is a woman with a penchant for appearing on television to share her nonsense. In her column today, this haranguing harpy also asked: “Is there anything that can’t be blamed on global warming?”, had a pop at Prince Charles, celebrated his “friend” Richard Madeley’s “heartache” for his ‘pissed-up’ wife Judy Finnigan and claimed the British economy to be “booming” and life to be “almost back to normal.” Just another day in the life of a truly nasty piece of toerag…

November 27, 2021
Ghislaine Maxwell WILL get a fair trial (if it actually happens)

Author Kat Rosenfield’s article suggesting Ghislaine Maxwell won’t get a fair trial and is being unfairly treated is both contemptible and laughable at the same time

Yesterday, author and Feminine Chaos podcast co-host Kat Rosenfield penned a contemptible yet laughable article for titled: “Will Ghislaine Maxwell get a fair trial? She should not be punished for Epstein’s crimes.”

Featured in the online magazine UnHerd – a title which tellingly also gives space to the especially acerbic harpy Tanya Gold, a woman best known for bigging-up Jimmy Savile and wrongly suggesting the Duchess of Sussex to be someone who “dares not only to inhabit the role of duchess but also to make it her own” – Rosenfield argued that “Maxwell’s guilt is treated as a foregone conclusion” and that the public show “glee at seeing her suffer” as “she’s too good a villain.”

Ghislaine Maxwell pictured at a football match with her pension fund robbing alleged murderer and spy father Robert. He once said of her: “I have a beautiful daughter and she’s just like me.” The word “beautiful” ought to have been changed to “deviant.”

In 2019, tedious twerp and ‘Unherd’ contributor Tanya Gold got the Duchess of Sussex completely wrong when she wrote in the ‘New York Times’: “Why does Meghan have the press in such paroxysms? Well, she is an interloper: divorced, American, biracial and, apparently, progressive. And she dares not only to inhabit the role of duchess but also to make it her own. Still, her critics – energized by their racism, misogyny and snobbery – can relax. She is not a revolutionary socialist, nor a convincing human rights activist who destroy everything they love. She will not bring down the royal family. In 2019, she is precisely what it needs.” Oxford educated (but Oxford hating), former alcoholic Tanya clearly ought to stick to other topics – she’s best known, after all, for also bigging-up the late paedophile Jimmy Savile as a “national treasure” and “enabling Savilisation.”

Going further, in a frankly ridiculous article – which was rightly subsequently condemned as being based on the weak premise that it simply goes only by the premise “she’s innocent because she’s a woman,” by one commentator, Francis MacGabhann – Ronsenfeld rambled:

“It’s worth remembering, here, that the feminist narrative of under-appreciated heroines has a misogynist cousin. The female villain who wields power in the form of manipulation is an ancient fictional archetype; from Eve and the apple on up, it serves to tell us that it’s women’s ambition which forms the true roots of men’s evil deeds. In Snow White, it’s the power-hungry and jealous queen who orders a huntsman to cut out the heart of her stepdaughter. In Shakespeare, it’s Lady Macbeth who gets stuck with indelible bloodstains on her hands.”

“These narratives serve men. The more we dwell on the idea of a conniving female pulling the strings, the less responsibility we assign to the man pulling the trigger – or in Epstein’s case, committing the assaults. In fact, the more we hear about Ghislaine Maxwell, the less agency Epstein seems to have. He was just a big, dumb animal; she was the one bringing him fresh meat, the brains of the organisation.”

“Taken to its natural conclusion, this type of rhetoric leads us to a place where men can’t be held accountable for their choices at all, if there’s a woman somewhere in the vicinity who could be seen as a behind-the-scenes manipulator. It’s how we decide that Prince Harry is just a hapless lump acting at the Machiavellian whims of his wife; it’s how we turn our attention away from men who commit violence in favour of pointing fingers at the mothers who raised them. At what point does giving due credit to women become just another way of excusing men?”

“There is an aggressive fervour surrounding Maxwell’s impending trial, and a thirst to see her punished in every possible way before that it even begins. Images from pretrial hearings show her shackled, her hair lank, her face bruised. In a recent dispatch from Brooklyn’s Metropolitan Detention Center, she described being kept in solitary confinement in a rat-infested cell, assaulted by guards, and given food crawling with maggots – all of which were promptly celebrated by her detractors as no less than she deserves.”

“The fact that Maxwell’s guilt hasn’t yet been determined by a court of law is irrelevant to the public glee at seeing her suffer. She’s too good a villain. And unlike Epstein, she’s still here.”

Rightly, most of the 78 responses thus far to Rosenfield’s delusional diatribe against a wicked wastrel woman who the sensible majority believe to have been a controller rather than simply an associate condemned the piece.

Of it, George Wells rationally responded: “This is very close to defending GM because she is a woman. Irrelevant. What matters now is facts – what happened, who else was involved and how did the coverups work… What matters is not identity politics – but stopping crime and punishing criminals, and supporting, to the extent possible, the victims.”

Another, Francisco Menezes, mockingly added: “What a pity Ghislaine is not a black lesbian. Then we could also claim racism and homophobia. What a delusional piece of nonsense this article is” whilst another, Dennis Boylon, sensibly concluded:

“She was a participant in a pedophile ring and went into hiding to escape justice. She is not innocent. Martha Stewart was an example of an innocent person being persecuted by the mob. There is an enormous amount of evidence against Maxwell if the lazy author of this piece cares to look at it.”

Elsewhere yesterday, Daniel Bates for DailyMail.com reported Maxwell “appeared healthier and more relaxed than she had in months as she attended a pretrial hearing in which the judge spoke about how she will proceed with jury selection.”

Bates added that her “newfound confidence was apparent at the end of the hour-long hearing” and concluded – of the ‘Bouncing Czech’s’ dangerously deviant daughter, who’d only a day earlier bleated: “I am weak, I am frail. I have no stamina. I am tired. I don’t even have shoes which fit properly” – “appeared much more glamorous.”

Clearly, Gislaine Maxwell is upping the game in her sham act. Buckle up and hunker down – we haven’t even got to the first interval in this tawdry tale.

Pictured top: Ghislaine Maxwell with President Donald Trump – a man who has cryptically “wished” his one-time friend “well,” but whom surprisingly didn’t get around to pardoning her before leaving office.

“Will Ghislaine Maxwell get a fair trial?” by Kat Rosenfield attracted many responses. The majority unsurprisingly disagreed with the author’s views.

Will Ghislaine Maxwell get a fair trial? – Of the feature, the amusingly monikered Franz Von Peppercorn responded: “There’s no real argument about Maxwell’s guilt or not here. Pointing out that there’s historically a ‘female villain who wields power in the form of manipulation is an ancient fictional archetype’ tells us nothing about Maxwell’s guilt or innocence in this particular case. She’s not accused, despite some newspaper headlines, of manipulating Epstein anyway, her defense is almost certainly the opposite – that she was manipulated or coerced. She’s accused of people trafficking. What’s missing in this feminist analysis is concern for the the women who were subject to the ‘enticement of minors and sex trafficking of underage girls, with several women alleging that Maxwell recruited them to work with Epstein in full knowledge that he would abuse and assault them.’ It’s a funny feminism that ignores them.”

Sensibly, Laura Cattell concluded: “She will get a fair trial, she’s in New York not ‘Hicksville’ – note the trial of Kyle Rittenhouse.”

November 17, 2021
Insane Ghislaine Denied Bail Yet Again
As rumours circulate that Ghislaine Maxwell will claim to be insane to try to halt her trial, she rightly yet again gets denied bail; will she make it to the mental house?

Yesterday, unsurprisingly just as rumours began to circulate that she might next put in a plea that she is insane, Ghislaine Maxwell was yet again denied bail by U.S. District Judge Alison J. Nathan after the latter cited her “ability to flee” justice.

Alleged mucky madam and sex trafficker Maxwell had pleaded to trade her jail cell for home detention, but Nathan rejected lawyer Bobbi Sternheim’s arguments that her client “has been subjected to physical and emotional abuse by jail guards.” She had also cited “poor and unsanitary living conditions, insufficient nutrition, difficulties reviewing millions of legal documents and sleep deprivation.”

Going further, another lawyer, David Oscar Markus previously ludicrously bleated to the court:

“Though she is a model prisoner who poses no danger to society and has done literally nothing to prompt ‘special’ treatment, she is kept in isolation – conditions fitting for Hannibal Lecter but not a 59-year-old woman who poses no threat to anyone.”

Responding, quite rightly, prosecutors suggested Maxwell’s advocate “turns to rhetoric and anecdotes better suited to tabloids than briefs” and added: “Where legal arguments can be found, they are cursory and unpersuasive.” Judge Nathan clearly agreed.

Previous bail applications on the part of “wannabe insane” Maxwell have been denied for various reasons and amongst the evidence that suggests she’s as trustworthy as Pinocchio are:
- The croaked paedophile Jeffrey Epstein’s ex-bestie used invented names whilst on the run in the summer of 2019 including Jennifer Marshall and Jen Marshall.
- Maxwell’s purchase of a house ironically called ‘Tuckedaway’ is indicative of her clearly giving the justice system the proverbial middle finger. Whilst living there, she “demonstrated willingness and sophisticated ability to live in hiding,” according to prosecutors.
- When the FBI arrived at ‘Tuckedaway’ to arrest her, Maxwell tried to flee and was also found with a mobile telephone wrapped in aluminium tin foil – a tactic used by criminals seeking to make their devices untraceable.
- When arrested, Maxwell was discovered along with a “security company staffed with former members of the British military guard” whom had been hired by her brother.
- Of her antics during her arrest, the FBI declared: “[She made] a seemingly misguided effort to evade detection… by law enforcement.”
- Of why they decided to hold her in custody, Audrey Strauss, the acting U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York declared: “The government respectfully submits that the defendant cannot meet her burden of overcoming the statutory presumption in favour of detention. There are no conditions of bail that would assure the defendant’s presence in court proceedings in this case. Accordingly, any application for bail should be denied.”
- When asked by the FBI which countries she was a citizen of, supposedly insane Maxwell arrogantly replied: “[I am a citizen of] TerraMar.” TerraMar is a non-existent place.
- Maxwell is a citizen of three countries: The United Kingdom, France and the United States of America. After her arrest, prosecutors pointed out France “does not extradite its citizens to the United States pursuant to French law.”
- She also has strong connections with Israel and her equally deviant father is buried there on the Mount of Olives.
- The 95-page address book – generally incorrectly referenced as Jeffrey Epstein’s ‘little black book’ – compiled by Maxwell and filled with countless friends of hers. It totals 1,971 individual names and provides clear indication of her ties and connections to powerful people across the globe.
- Maxwell has huge cash resources and has previously cited the ability to offer up £21.1 million ($28.5 million, €24.6 million or درهم7 million) and likely has other funds that have not yet even been declared.
- Maxwell has the qualifications and ability to pilot submarines and aside from that and her husband Scott Borgerson’s maritime connections, the pair have links to plenty of wealthy people who could speed the alleged mucky madam away in a covert fashion using such vessels.
- Mr Borgerson claimed to be “an ex-military man” during the time the couple were purchasing ‘Tuckedaway’ and was previously in the U.S. Coast Guard. It is obvious that such skills would be useful to his wife if she were to go on the run.
- Maxwell appeared in a photoshopped image released to the press by an associate in August 2019. The image featured a bus stop with an advert that had never been shown at that location.
- Maxwell did not even tell her own family she had been married to Scott Borgerson since 2016 prior to her arrest.
- Maxwell’s lawyer’s release of the image of her with a black eye – which they claimed to have been caused by abuse by guards – turned out to be an example of fake news. She had actually simply suffered from an eye infection.
- Of Maxwell, her very own friend Lady Victoria Hervey once tellingly declared: “I don’t think anyone is going to find her. She’s gone far away. She’s a bit like a James Bond character. She’s quite a unique person and I don’t believe anyone is going to find her… I don’t think we will ever see her again, it’s going to be like Robert Maxwell continued; she will continue that family mystery.”
- Proecutors have declared Maxwell has “the resources and skills to flee prosecution and added: “She is an extreme risk of flight.”
- Judge Nathan has previously declared of Robert Maxwell’s daughter: “[There are] no combination of conditions that can reasonably assure her appearance [if she is granted bail].”
Though assumed innocent until found otherwise, in addition, Maxwell’s alleged victims claim that “she set the trap” for the grooming and abuse carried out by both herself and Jeffrey Epstein.

Clearly, the sum total of this behaviour – if proven to have occurred – is indicative of someone of warped and deviant mind and equally that she is allegedly considering getting herself into a mental asylum in a bid to stop her trial provides evidence that she’ll do utterly anything to avoid facing justice for her supposed crimes. Once again today, we join those saying: Shame on Ghislaine Maxwell and shame on her enabling legal and PR teams.

Pictured top: Repeated bail seeker Ghislaine Maxwell with her ‘bestie’ paedo pal Jeffrey Epstein dozing to her left at a fashion show.

Last week, ‘The Steeple Times’ reported that Maxwell’s PR team are using their @RealGhislaine account to try to garner sympathy for the alleged sex trafficker by asking followers to share recipes. Given their comparison of their client’s conditions to the equally insane Hannibal Lecter, we’d argue the best meal for her might be liver and fava beans washed down with Chianti.

Though allegedly insane Maxwell claims to have been mistreated in jail, her current conditions in the Manhattan Detention Center are actually remarkably more cushy than those of any other inmate currently incarcerated in the United States of America.

‘Twit Girl’ and knicker flogger turned pointless prattler Lady Victoria Hervey with supposedly insane Ghislaine Maxwell – a woman she claimed “demonstrated” to her how best to give a blowjob and told her “dirty jokes” in the 1990s. Of the former, the late Tara Palmer-Tomkinson once stated: “[She’s] unpleasant… A right snob,” whilst of the latter, this week, Laura Pullman quoted Prince Andrew’s distant cousin Christina Oxenberg in ‘The Times’ and wrote: “Ghislaine Maxwell is a ‘devious fruitcake’ and ‘no friend of mine.’”

On Sunday, on her podcast, amongst other topics, crusading author of ‘Ghislaine Maxwell: An Unauthorized Biography’ Kirby Sommers discussed the alleged mucky madam’s prison conditions and how other prisoners had been made to twice scrub the entire floor now occupied by her in advance of her arrival. Going further, Sommers and her guest discussed the Maxwell family’s involvement in espionage – something that clearly must be taken into account when considering whether to bail this wicked wastrel woman.
November 10, 2021
Who’s Afraid Of Ghislaine Maxwell?

Author Kirby Sommers asks: “Who’s afraid of Ghislaine Maxwell?”

One of the passages I’ve often quoted in some of my books has been from a New York Times article dated January 11, 1996 written by Christopher Mason. The article describes Leslie Wexner’s New York City mansion down to the “lead lined bathroom.” It reads, in part:

“Visitors described a bathroom reminiscent of James Bond movies: hidden beneath a stairway, lined with lead to provide shelter from attack and supplied with closed-circuit television screens and a telephone, both concealed in a cabinet beneath a sink.”

In this article, Mason adds:

“When asked how long Mr. Wexner had occupied the property, Jeffrey Epstein, his protégé and one of his financial advisors, replied, ‘Les never spent more than two months there.”

After a couple more paragraphs, with details about the house, Mason adds that he reached Mr. Epstein in Florida who told him the house was now his. It is worth noting that throughout the 1980s and into the 1990s Jeffrey Epstein was listed in the public phone books as Edward Epstein. Add to this that Epstein was extremely secretive and didn’t speak to journalists unless it was pre-arranged by one of his public relations people.

Imagine my surprise when I discovered Christopher Mason who wrote the New York Times article is also Ghislaine Maxwell’s “friend”. Mason states he met Maxwell in 1989—having been introduced by “mutual friends.” Did Maxwell play the role of PR person for Epstein too? It’s a fair question that no one to date has asked.

In 1993 Maxwell hired Mason to write what is arguably the creepiest poem ever for Jeffrey Epstein’s 40th birthday. It goes like this:

Poor Jeffrey Epstein is 40, oy vey!

Life must be tough his hair is already so gray

He sure looks older but it’s clear from his smile

The older he gets, the more juvenile

Ghislaine is lavishing him with her affections

She claims he has 24-hour erections

Sounds like he’s busy, now ain’t that berserk

How does he find the time to get off to work

He wakes when the cock crows while everyone slumbers

He rivals Einstein when crunching those numbers

He taught at Dalton: the naughty boy blushes

To think of schoolgirls and all of their crushes.

Ghislaine Maxwell, daughter of infamous thief and alleged Mossad spy, Robert Maxwell, has been incarcerated at the Brooklyn Metropolitan Correction Facility in Brooklyn, New York since July 2, 2020. She has been charged with grooming minor girls for the deceased pedophile and rapist Jeffrey Epstein. Her trial is scheduled to begin on November 29, 2021.

Mason, however, is not the only mainstream media journalist who has been caught as being friends with the alleged Madam. Vicky Ward, a former Vanity Fair writer, was outed after Jeffrey Epstein’s arrest in the summer of 2019. Who outed her: yours truly. Here’s one of my many tweets attempting to bring attention to their connection:

https://twitter.com/KirbySommers/status/1160225297146494983

Ghislaine Maxwell was denied her request for jury selection in her trial to be held privately last week. Pictured here with croaked paedophile Jeffrey Epstein, the mucky madam has been denied bail on multiple occasions and has shown no attempt to reach a plea bargain even.

However, Maria Farmer, who worked with Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell and who gave an interview to Ward for Vanity Fair (which was never printed) has also been sounding the warning bell about Ward’s connection to Maxwell.

There are more. Many, many more.

Barry Diller, Chairman and Senior Executive of IAC (InterActiveCorp), owns The Daily Beast. He was a board member of Ghislaine Maxwell’s TerraMar non-profit which was quickly shuttered in July 2019 — less than one week after Epstein’s arrest on sex trafficking charges. Chelsea Clinton, daughter of former President Bill Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, sits on the IAC’s Board of Directors. She has been heavily criticized for having been paid $9 million by IAC. There are more connections through Diller’s wife—fashion maven Diane Von Furstenberg. Her son, Prince Alexander von Furstenberg, from her first marriage to Prince Egon von Furstenberg (a banker and interior designer) in the now infamous “Jeffrey Epstein black book.”

There are more mainstream media connections—frankly, too many to cover in one article. Suffice, to ask, however: “Who’s afraid of Ghislaine Maxwell?” Seems the answer is everyone.

Sex abuse survivor and advocate Kirby Sommers is the author of Ghislaine Maxwell: An Unauthorized Biography. To order it, click here.

https://twitter.com/KirbySommers/status/1451441752863354880

October 24, 2021
How did ‘Rapunzel’ Trump first meet ‘Evil’ Epstein’?

As it is revealed that Melania Trump was nicknamed “Rapunzel,” we again revisit the question of whether the former first lady was trafficked to America by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell

In August 2020, The Steeple Times asked: “Was Melania Trump trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein” and now with revelations yesterday in Business Insider that the former first lady was nicknamed “Rapunzel” by the American secret services we again revisit the story of the connections between these equally strange characters.

As we previously suggested back in 2020, Jeffrey Epstein supposedly began telling anyone who’d listen that he was the one that introduced the then Melania Knauss to Donald Trump just after the 45^th POTUS came to power in 2017.

Going further, at the time, we added:

“Given the disgraced financier’s planes frequently jetted back and forth to Eastern Europe, stranger things indeed have happened [than that it was Jeffrey Epstein whom first brought the now former first lady into America]. Melania Trump could have flown on the infamous ‘Lolita Express’ and she could [even have been] one of mucky Maxwell’s recruits.”

Though photographed repeatedly with the deviant duo over the years, the Trumps – whom first met according to Wikipedia in September 1998 – have repeatedly rubbished Epstein’s claim and attempted to distance themselves from the croaked paedophile.

Responding of Epstein’s wild allegation, another man who claims to have introduced Melania Knauss – subsequently “nicknamed ‘Rapunzel’ by the secret service because she rarely left ‘her tower, aka the White House residence’” – to Donald Trump, Italian nightclub Paolo Zampolli, simply responded “NO WAY. Fake news. B.S.”

Pictured top: A mock version of Melania Trump in fancy dress (left) and a real photo of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell in fancy dress at Windsor Castle in 2006. Epstein dressed in a Navy SEAL uniform for the occasion – Princess Beatrice’s 18^th birthday party – and included both legitimate service ribbons and medals and fictitious ones in spite of the fact he’d never been a Navy SEAL.

Donald Trump – whom “wished” his one-time chum Ghislaine Maxwell “well” in July 2020 – and his wife Melania Trump have appeared in many pictures with the late paedophile Jeffrey Epstein and his mucky madam Ghislaine Maxwell. According to ‘Insider’ in July 2019: “After Trump was elected president, Epstein started claiming that he was the one who introduced Trump to then-Slovenian model Melania Knauss.”

In October 2000, the Duke of York was pictured at a nightclub alongside Ghislaine Maxwell and Heidi Klum. The theme of the bash was ‘pimps and hookers’ and for the occasion the ‘Bouncing Czech’s’ deviant daughter dressed in “a bleach blonde wig, midriff bearing top and gold pants” whilst the model wore “a black wig, red lipstick, black latex bodice and black skirt.”

Melania Trump’s outfits, due to her position on the international stage, have regularly been dissected by the media. Her “fashion fails” – unlike those of Ghislaine Maxwell – however, have not to our knowledge included dressing up as a hooker.

https://twitter.com/KirbySommers/status/1444578335477141507
In further evidence of the bizarre and frankly weird activities supposedly ‘enjoyed’ by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell this morning, crusading author Kirby Sommers tweeted: “What I will say now that I keep silent about because I was asked to is there exists a photo showing Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell at Bohemian Grove. The elite meet there once every year to worship a 30-40 foot owl god they call ‘Molech.’”

https://twitter.com/KirbySommers/status/1443985900858482700
In another recent tweet, Sommers shared an image of Donald Trump with Robert Maxwell and asked an important question. Her missive read: “Robert Maxwell was one of Donald Trump’s first forays into Russia. Did Maxwell launder money for Trump?”

October 3, 2021
Randy Andy’s ‘Eyes Wide Shut’ Creepiness

Dinner between Prince Andrew and Jeffrey Epstein is described as being like “Eyes Wide Shut with a twist” and “creepy” by journalist Katie Couric

Clearly, as can inevitably be expected of a mouse-not-a-man who claims he can’t even sweat, Prince Andrew is still failing to face up to the music in regards to the civil lawsuit he has been forced to accept having been served with.

Pictured this morning in The Sun driving his Range Rover back from Balmoral to his Royal Lodge, Windsor home and waving in a “brazen” fashion, ‘Randy Andy’ also got a mention in a Newsweek feature yesterday in which the journalist Katie Couric described his antics at an “Eyes Wide Shut with a twist – creepy and body-part art” style dinner at the late paedophile Jeffrey Epstein’s New York mansion.

Couric added: “I couldn’t imagine what Epstein and Andrew were up to, apart from trying to cultivate friends in the media. Which, in retrospect, they must have figured they’d need when the paedophilia charges started rolling in.”

Of the dinner and his stay at the Epstein residence, the Duke of York previously arrogantly remarked:

“I went there with the sole purpose of saying to him that because he had been convicted, it was inappropriate for us to be seen together.”

“Oh, in 2010, there certainly wasn’t a party to celebrate his release in December because it was a small dinner party, there were only eight or ten of us I think at the dinner. If there was a party then I’d know nothing about that.”

“At the end of the day, with a benefit of all the hindsight that one can have, it was definitely the wrong thing to do. But at the time I felt it was the honourable and right thing to do and I admit fully that my judgment was probably coloured by my tendency to be too honourable but that’s just the way it is.”

Katie Couric attended the 2010 dinner alongside amongst others Chelsea Handler, Woody Allen, Charlie Rose, Prince Andrew, Eva Andersson-Dubin and George Stephanopoulos. It was supposedly her only encounter with the late paedophile.

‘Jeffrey Epstein’s Paedo Palace’ – Herbert Straus House, 9 East 71st Street, Lenox Hill, New York, NY 10021, United States of America was the setting for the dinner.

Top: Jeffrey Epstein pictured on the telephone in his decidedly kitsch ‘Bet Lynch-esque’ mansion on date unknown. Bottom: Prince Andrew pictured at the door of the residence waving as two young ladies and Jeffrey Epstein depart in December 2010.

Prince Andrew’s most ridiculous remarks

“I could have worse tags than ‘Airmiles Andy’ – although I don’t know what they are.”

“People say to me: ‘Would you like to swap your life with me for 24 hours? Your life must be very strange.’ But, of course, I have not experienced any other life. It’s not strange to me.”

“There’s a slight problem with the sweating because I have a peculiar medical condition which is that I don’t sweat or I didn’t sweat at the time and that was… was it… yes, I didn’t sweat at the time because I had suffered what I would describe as an overdose of adrenalin in the Falkland’s War when I was shot at and I simply… it was almost impossible for me to sweat. And it’s only because I have done a number of things in the recent past that I am starting to be able to do that again. So, I’m afraid to say that there’s a medical condition that says that I didn’t do it so therefore…”

“We can’t be certain as to whether or not that’s my hand on her whatever it is, left… left side … [of the photograph with Virginia Roberts] Nobody can prove whether or not that photograph has been doctored but I don’t recollect that photograph ever being taken.”

“I went [to Jeffrey Epstein’s house] with the sole purpose of saying to him that because he had been convicted, it was inappropriate for us to be seen together. And I had a number of people counsel me in both directions, either to go and see him or not to go and see him and I took the judgement call that because this was serious and I felt that doing it over the telephone was the chicken’s way of doing it. I had to go and see him and talk to him.”

“[Jeffrey Epstein’s house] was a convenient place to stay. I mean I’ve gone through this in my mind so many times. At the end of the day, with a benefit of all the hindsight that one can have, it was definitely the wrong thing to do. But at the time I felt it was the honorable and right thing to do and I admit fully that my judgment was probably colored by my tendency to be too honorable but that’s just the way it is.”

“I’ve always been told I was extremely well behaved as a kid.”

“If you’re a man it is a positive act to have sex with somebody. You have to … take some sort of positive action and so therefore if you try to forget it’s very difficult to try and forget a positive action and I do not remember anything.”

“It’s slightly complicated for people to grasp the idea of a head of state in human form.”

And finally, stating the bloody obvious: “Today is reality. Yesterday is history.”

October 1, 2021
Matthew Steeples and Shaun Attwood at CrimeCon UK 2021

Matthew Steeples and Shaun Attwood to discuss the Maxwell, McCann and Menendez cases at CrimeCon UK 2021 this September

On 25^th September at the Leonardo Royal Hotel in St Paul’s, London, editor-in-chief of The Steeple Times Matthew Steeples and True Crime Channel host Shaun Attwood will be amongst 80 speakers in attendance at the first London outing of CrimeCon, the world’s “number one true crime event.”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-EvrJdWY1ko

Matthew Steeples and Shaun Attwood will focus on the current developments in the case against mucky madam Ghislaine Maxwell, but will also discuss matters relating to the Menendez brothers and ‘missing’ Madeleine McCann.

To purchase a discounted ticket, use the code ATTWOOD.

Attwood and Steeples are billed to discuss topics they’ve covered jointly in the past and their 5.15pm to 5.45pm slot is described as:

Shaun Attwood and Matthew Steeples discuss the latest developments in some of the biggest stories in true crime. What’s in store for Ghislaine Maxwell? Is the Maddie McCann investigation a waste of money? Should the Menendez brothers be released?

Amongst other speakers present during the two day event will be the ex-chief crown prosecutor Nazir Afzal OBE, the forensic psychologist Kerry Daynes, the author Lynda La Plante, the broadcaster Anita Rani, the investigative journalist John Sweeney, the Don’t F**k With Cats star Deanna Thompson, the broadcaster Denise Welch and the investigative journalist Mark Williams-Thomas.

In addition, the conference will feature live shows, immersive experiences including crime scene recreations, a shopping area, drinks parties and a dinner.

Launched in the US in 2017, the gathering has previously “attracted thousands of visitors,” according to the Mirror. It “features criminologists, pathologists, detectives, documentary makers [and] podcasters” and all attendees must be over 18 years old.

To book tickets, click here. To get a discount, use the code ATTWOOD at purchase point.

September 8, 2021