Friday, July 30, 2021

Governing racing

Complaints that standards of welfare in British horseracing aren’t high enough are without real merit

 

The horseracing world has been enveloped in debate in the wake of The Daily Mirror printing images of Wigmore Hall being shot after breaking his leg. Now, with news that the Queen’s horse Estimate has been stripped of its Gold Cup finish after testing positive for morphine, yet more commentary has followed about the way in which racing is run.

 

Wigmore Hall
Wigmore Hall

The Queen with Estimate
The Queen with Estimate

Whilst the Estimate decision was a formality and caused by the horse consuming feed contaminated with poppy seeds that had supplied by the feed company Dodson & Horrell, how racing is run is once again being questioned in some quarters.

 

Naturally, the images published by The Mirror upset many and Wigmore Hall’s trainer, Newmarket-based Michael Hall, himself commented:

 

“It’s a very insensitive thing to publish… [Worse than that] was that the journalist referred to Wigmore Hall as ‘it’ and that sums up his lack of understanding of the situation”.

 

“The love we have for horses, people who work with them day in and day out, no one ever calls a horse ‘it’… I just don’t see the plus side of printing [these images], it is very distressing for us. After losing one of our favourites we then have to go through this. From my point of view the journalist just shows his lack of understanding of horses throughout the piece”.

 

Equally, as has been pointed out by the British Horseracing Authority, the equine fatality rate in British racing has fallen from just over 0.3% of runners to just over 0.2% of runners in the last decade. Those involved in horseracing care about the welfare of animals and though any fatality is regrettable, it does not mean that this sport is badly governed.

 

As The Spectator added, shooting Wigmore Hall was “the kindest thing to do”. A decision to put the horse down was made instantly to minimise suffering and that Animal Aid and others attack this decision is just ridiculous. That such quarters also bring up the case of Estimate as a “welfare fail” is equally ludicrous and again shows such people to have a lack of understanding of this sport.

 

The Mirror and Animal Aid should apologise for their actions and the public should be made aware that racing, in the main, is well run and regulated.

 

 

Subscribe to our free once daily email newsletter here:

     

    The Steeple Times
    We research and background check our articles. If you believe we have made and error in some detail please get in touch, we seek always to write the truth and stand against a press owned by a self selected few. Please help us, we will accept all your likes, subscriptions and anonymous suport. The Editor and his team at the Steeple Times.

    1 COMMENT

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here

    Advertisement
    Advertisement

    Become a Patron of The Steeple Times

    Independent journalism will only remain independent if it is supported by clear-thinking people like you. We each have the command to make a real difference. Join us.

    2,668FansLike
    2,068FollowersFollow
    11,547FollowersFollow

    Subscribe For DAILY NEWS

    Please subscribe, like and share this very British site, it helps us grow. Your data is protected and The Steeple Times will send you an email at noon everyday that we rather trust you will enjoy.

    Advertisement

    Weather

    London
    broken clouds
    17.2 ° C
    18.7 °
    15.1 °
    80 %
    6.7kmh
    75 %
    Fri
    20 °
    Sat
    21 °
    Sun
    19 °
    Mon
    20 °
    Tue
    21 °