Anthea Turner swings into an interview with ‘The Sun’ and shares that she had therapy over her tacky ‘Flakegate’ wedding photos
Anthea Turner never misses an opportunity to swing into action when it comes to getting herself publicity and in an interview in today’s The Sun she went into overdrive.
Aside from moaning that she was “vilified” over her posed wedding photos with a chocolate flake rammed in her inglorious gob and claiming “I apparently did this heinous thing with a bar of Cadbury’s… You’d have thought I had single-handedly manufactured Covid-19 in the laboratory and released it to the masses,” Turner bizarrely announced: “It was like being naked all the time. I felt absolutely stripped.”
Going further of ‘Flakegate,’ tiresome Turner added: “I didn’t even like it. I’m more of a Dairy Milk girl” and declared she’d “had two bouts of therapy, helping her come to terms with the episode and move on… I realise no one died, but at the time and for years afterwards it was devastating.”
In further indication of her delusionality, ‘Princess Tippytoes’ (AKA ‘Shagger Turner’) concluded: “I was the original accidental influencer… but never got a penny for it… I’m still alive and kicking.” A Cadbury’s Flake with that Anth?
Anth’s Swings Back to Flakegate – Previously, some have gone as far as to try to blow Miss Turner up on live television even. That’s how irritating she is truly considered.Anth’s Swings Back to Flakegate – Anthea Turner will never be able to live down the ‘Flakegate’ incident on her August 2000 wedding day to cad and bounder Grant Bovey. The grubby pair were paid £120,000 by OK! magazine for the rights to their wedding.
After Katie Hopkins was forced to say “sorry” to Finsbury Park Mosque, she should now be sent to where she belongs – social media’s equivalent of Siberia
Though Hopkins got off without having to pay damages as she has been insolvent since 2018 due to her previous libel loss against the equally noxious Jack Monroe, that she was forced to write the words “I am genuinely sorry” were a most deserved punishment.
That she was also made to write: “I would like to take this opportunity to acknowledge the contributions made by the Mosque to society” is even more important and now, yet again, all that this childish woman has done is to again prove that the ‘C*NT’ award she was given in February was well and truly deserved.
It is now time that “sorry” Miss Hopkins finally did the decent thing and that is to permanently shut her filth filled trap.
Hopkins was forced to issue her apology via Instagram as she was banned from Twitter in June for breaching the medium’s “hateful conduct” policy.Amongst the many lowpoints of moralising-without-morals-herself Katie Hopkins’ life was the moment she got caught having sex with a married man in a field. Of this, she shamelessly remarked: “Mark was a married man and yes I stole him. I stole my first husband as well – get over it.”
Was she really repentant? Unsurprisingly, after issuing her so-called “apology” Katie Hopkins returned to social media and uploaded a video suggesting people “clear the noise” and thus provided indication that she probably isn’t really sorry at all. She stated: “I have been through a few things in my life and they all did pass.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jgd3LhvlXqI
Hopkins then also uploaded an interview in which she ranted against the Black Lives Matter movement and suggested she’d had “more men cry on her than at any time in her life.” She also bizarrely claimed she’d “be able to look after America” if “people came home.”
Some of “not so sorry” Katie Hopkins’ most outrageous moments:
On people with dementia:
“Dementia sufferers should not be blocking beds. What is the point of life when you no longer know you are living it?”
On Ramadan:
“Ramadan typically brings a spike in violence in Middle East. I get grumpy when I don’t eat – but I don’t blow things up. Religion of peace?”
On ginger haired children:
“Ginger babies. Like a baby. Just so much harder to love.”
On ‘Highgella’ Nigella Lawson:
“A self-confessed drug-taker, spendthrift, and a self-obsessed flirt determined to show other women they were imperfect.”
On tourists stranded in Egypt after the bombing of a Russian airplane:
“I think if you are going to take your children out from school, which is ridiculous in itself, stick them in a destination that is dangerous, don’t be complaining on my television that you’ve been delayed at the airport, don’t be complaining that you don’t have any information, and don’t be coming back acting like you are a refugee from a war-torn country.”
On Jewish politician Ed Milliband’s wife:
“Pollsters say Justine [Milliband] is the least popular of the party wives. He might stick her head in the oven and turn on the gas.”
On refugees:
“Make no mistake, these migrants are like cockroaches. They might look a bit ‘Bob Geldof’s Ethiopia circa 1984,’ but they are built to survive a nuclear bomb. They are survivors.”
On obesity:
“I don’t really like fat people… Would I employ you if you were obese? No, I would not… If you are obese, you look lazy.”
All-round plonker Phillip Schofield’s wine range condemned as “only fit for the bin” and “no more palatable than fizzy Ribena”
Known for his extremely short fuse and once described by David Dimbleby as “cretinous,” Phillip Schofield recently launched a wine range in Waitrose and on Amazon. Unsurprisingly, it’s been a total flop and was quite deservedly condemned at the weekend in The Sun as “overpriced” and “bitter.”
Priced between £19.99 and £24.99 for 2.25-litre boxes, Schofield’s was slammed by one punter as “only fit for the bin” on Waitrose’s website. They added: “The wine [was] effervescing within the bag. No more palatable than fizzy Ribena” whilst another suggested: “I don’t have anything positive to say about the flavour at all. Not pleasant drinking. We failed to finish the box.”
Prior to launching the range in April, Schofield quite pompously bragged to The Drinks Business:
“When I agreed to this partnership, I had certain conditions; I wanted to be part of the tasting team… I wanted it to be good value. The result is something I felt I could really invest in.”
Schofield – whose ‘coming out’ and alleged connections to a young man named Matthew McGreevy attracted much media attention earlier this year – unsurprisingly failed to respond to a request from The Steeple Times for comment; he was probably instead too busy nursing a hangover headache from drinking his equivalent of Sir Cliff Richard’s equally vile plonk.
Pictured top: All-round plonker Phillip Schofield on a night out with his one-time ‘friend’ Matt McGreevy; Phillip Schofield’s bag-in-box wines.
Sir Cliff Richard’s associations with wines, just like Phillip Schofield’s, have not always proved fruitful. In 2006, appearing on Gordon Ramsay’s ‘The F-Word,’ the crappy crooner had a meltdown during a blind tasting. After sipping one unnamed offering, Sir Cliff announced: “That’s rubbish. I wouldn’t pay for that. It’s tainted, it’s insipid, it tastes like vinaigrette. I’d never buy that.” Ramsay, responded by remarking: “Cliff, that’s your wine”. The singer is said to have answered: “Young man, go f**k yourself.”What a Plonker – Phillip Schofield was photographed with Matthew McGreevy on a number of occasions during the latter’s youth.What a Plonker – The television presenter with his “friend” at a later date.
As filmmaker Sean Stone suggests Ghislaine Maxwell could expose unpleasant truths for Hollywood, Virginia Giuffre scores another blow against the mucky madam
Asked during an interview last week: “What is up with Hollywood? Can it come back? Can it survive COVID-19?” by Russia Today America’sRick Sanchez, Oliver Stone’s son and fellow filmmaker, Sean, responded: “Can it survive Ghislaine Maxwell is the question, actually.”
He continued: “I still think there is a lot more that is going to come out here with this Ghislaine trial because remember who, all, has been on Jeffrey Epstein island. And there’s been more in terms of the private jets and there’s been more than Chris Tucker and Kevin Spacey and the Clintons. I think you are going to see other Hollywood icons involved… More than we imagine.”
“I don’t think it’s even about her spilling the beans. I think there is case and evidence that is being drawn up that is in conjunction with the investigation into her. A lot more will be exposed about Epstein and Epstein island. I am 100% positive on that. And the question is who will be involved, who will be implicated, who will talk.”
“Look, we haven’t seen the end of it. ‘Me Too’ was the beginning of this, we haven’t seen the end of it. So, COVID is a wonderful opportunity for everything to shut down and restructure, but I think there is a lot of concern in Hollywood across the board from the exposure on the Epstein thing.”
Elsewhere yesterday, Virginia Giuffre told the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan that “Ghislaine Maxwell’s desire for privacy failed to justify the continued sealing of a deposition that the British socialite has fought to keep out of the public eye” according to Byline.
Giuffre’s lawyers, Sigrid McCawley and David Boies, remarked: “Maxwell’s vague argument about privacy interests cannot justify total closure of the deposition materials [and overcome] the public’s presumption of access.”
Going further, of moaning Maxwell’s attempts to suggest she was getting “unfair pretrial publicity” and her belief that she will be place before “a tainted jury pool, especially in large metropolitan areas such as New York,” the lawyers added:
“The size and heterogeneity of such communities make it unlikely that even the most sensational case will become ‘a cause célèbre’ where the whole community becomes interested in all the morbid details.”
Still very much in their early stages, the unravelling of Miss Maxwell’s grubby activities has barely begun and now, as Sean Stone has rightly observed, there will be a lot of well-known people who’ll be resorting to the Donald Trump school of “good wishes.” It’ll be fascinating to watch them fall like dominoes.
Pictured top: Mendacious mucky madam Ghislaine Maxwell with the catty catwalk calamity Naomi Campbell at a party in New York in 2002.
Stoning the Mucky Madam – Oliver Stone’s son Sean has suggested Ghislaine Maxwell could do a lot of damage to the Hollywood elite as further details about her activities with the paedophile Jeffrey Epstein are revealed.Stoning the Mucky Madam – Ghislaine Maxwell even sat on thrones in Buckingham Palace with the Hollywood horror Kevin Spacey. Yesterday in Manhattan, actor Anthony Rapp and another man filed a lawsuit seeking unspecified damages against Spacey, accusing him of sexual assaults in the 1980s when they were teenagers.Ghislaine Maxwell’s Hollywood connections numbered the likes of the now jailed producer Harvey Weinstein. Here, she is pictured at a party for one of Prince Andrew’s daughters with that particular paedophile and her ex-lover and now deceased paedophile Jeffrey Epstein.No wonder she had an interest in the oceans – Miss Maxwell’s octopus-like tentacles have stretched far and wide and her address book included everyone from media moguls such as Rupert Murdoch (pictured) to aristocrats and actors.Prince Andrew – accused of abuse by the at-the-time underage Virginia Giuffre – is another associate who has much to fear from his long-time friend. Will she do the right thing and finally tell the truth about what he got upto on 10th March 2001 in her house at 44 Kinnerton Street, Belgravia, London SW1X 8ES? Somehow, that seems unlikely, but stranger things have indeed happened.
Jeremy Clarkson was spot on in calling out the Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s £112 million Netflix deal “just awful” and “drivel”
‘MeGain’ and her drip of a husband’s £112 million Netflix deal has quite rightly been rounded on by the majority as ridiculous and cringeworthy, but in commenting on it in The Sun yesterday, Jeremy Clarkson summed it up perfectly.
Clarkson – whom previously remarked of Prince Harry’s criticism of the Commonwealth as “muddled” and an example of someone “getting their knickers in a twist” – stated:
“They will be drivel. £100 million to make shows and films that inform and give hope? Kill me.”
“I’d be much better making their programmes, as I don’t give a s**t about anything they give a s**t about. Just awful.”
He is right and quite frankly Netflix should also be mocked for having bought the very worst example of a pap from the modern day Mrs Simpson.
Jeremy Clarkson was right to call out the Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s Netflix deal. It is something that will most deservedly motor into obscurity – as indeed it most definitely is nothing other than ludicrous.
Jeremy Clarkson has previously been lauded for telling the former Meghan Markle to “get a grip.”
BHS bandit Sir Philip Green’s wife’s bleating about being stuck on her yacht in Monaco is nothing but pathetic; Lady Green plainly has no comprehension of how out of touch she truly is with reality
The world said “diddums” for Sir Philip Green and his ludicrously wealthy, tax minimising wife Tina today with news that the couple cannot take their £100 million gin palace on a “family cruise” due to two staff onboard testing positive for coronavirus.
In an article titled: “Sir Shifty Cannot Be Shifted,” The Sun reported comments from Lady Green – whose grubby “Benny Hill-esque” husband ought to have been stripped of his title after having wrecked the British high street and treated his workforce so appalling – where she bleated about being stuck in Monaco and having a yellow flag of quarantine imposed on their vessel.
Lady Green plainly hasn’t learnt from her and her husband’s disastrous Prince Andrew-esque past forays into media relations. The public really couldn’t give two hoots for her situation; they’d rather the two of them did the decent thing and learnt the art of treating their employees and the British taxpayer properly.
Pictured top: A cartoon of Marie Antoinette-like Lady Green – a woman whose extravagance knows no bounds, but whose sympathy for ordinary folk could be summed up as: “Let them eat cake.”
On Twitter, ‘Metro’ mocked Lady Green and her husband and stated: “Our thoughts are with anyone quarantining on a superyacht at this difficult time.”Sir Philip Green and his wife have enjoyed a life of luxury with Bentleys and Louis Vuitton tennis racket covers whilst their workers have been forced into penury.Previously another Twitter user, @RedFlagUK, pointed out that “greedy capitalist” Sir Philip “robbed people’s pensions to purchase himself a luxury yacht.”In April, Led By Donkeys quite rightly reminded Sir Philip Green – whom was branded a cross between “Shylock and Al Capone” by the actor Steven Berkoff in The Steeple Times in September 2016 – of his contradictory behaviour alongside an image of him looking like a beached whale.
As it is revealed there is one rule for Ghislaine Maxwell and one for everyone else in the US legal system on visitations, her alleged links with the CIA and Mossad are again outed
Jeffrey Epstein and Maxwell also, according to the author of Jeffrey Epstein: Predator SpyKirby Sommers, allegedly worked for the CIA and Mossad and as a result of these dodgy connections, the mucky madam could well be in line for special treatment from the US legal system.
Whilst stories to date have suggested ‘Bouncing Bob’s’ deviant daughter is complaining about her lack of email and a desk, which indicate to the contrary, this could all be part of a distraction technique. Maxwell and Epstein most certainly had power in their vast address book and whatever may be said of this vile woman, she is still attracting the support of some of them and is far from stupid.
Aside from Donald Trump “wishing her well” in a signal that suggests he knows that she has more up her sleeve, the leakage of the story about her alleged affair with Bill Clinton was another sign that Maxwell will be playing every card she can. Don’t be surprised if she appallingly pulls off some kind of coup that disgracefully gets her off the hook in the near future. Stranger things have, indeed, happened.
News that Rupert Murdoch has teamed up with Andrew Neil and Nigel Farage to launch a new TV channel is an utter monstrosity
Rupert Murdoch, love him or loathe him, is certainly a powerhouse. He’s undoubtedly a megalomaniac and he’s definitely prepared to twist the rules, but news that he’s teaming up with Andrew Neil and Nigel Farage to launch a “right-wing news channel” named ‘GB News’ is proof that the lunatics have definitely overtaken the asylum.
Of the move, colluder with the thankfully dead paedophile Max Clifford Kelvin MacKenzie predictably and somewhat crudely remarked: “Taking on the quite dreadful Sky News. More people see my rear end than watch Kay Burley at breakfast.”
Given the parties involved, all that can be expected from this channel is the peddling of extremism, hate and bigotry and that the “fat northern… bit of a bruiser” Andre Walker took to YouTube to add: “Good on them… I really hope ‘GB News’ takes off” about sums up where this channel belongs: In the dustbin.
Friend of deceased paedophile and mucky madam Prince Andrew targeted in a protest outside Buckingham Palace; ‘Randy Andy’ now needs to do the decent thing and answer the FBI’s questions
Yesterday, video footage of a protest outside Buckingham Palace against paedophiles appeared on YouTube. It was captioned: “Anti-Prince Andrew demonstration” variously, but strangely the mainstream media have decided not to even cover the event.
Previously targeted at the palace in February with an American school bus carrying an advert featuring his face and the words: “If you see this man please ask him to call the FBI to answer their questions” by the lawyer Gloria Allred, whom represents several of Jeffrey Epstein’s victims, the Duke of York was unlikely present during either of the debacles.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hrqo4UUT_X8
A video of the protest at Buckingham Palace against Prince Andrew was uploaded to YouTube yesterday.
That’s right @RoyalFamily lol outside and see the crowds gather around and call you out. You do not deserve to be collecting taxes from the public- what are they getting out of it? A corrupt gov- well that’s what you get- protesters! #saybyetotheroyals#Justice🦋 https://t.co/17mWGITDq0
Virginia Giuffre reacted to news of the protest by taking to Twitter to state: “That’s right @RoyalFamily lol outside and see the crowds gather around and call you out. You do not deserve to be collecting taxes from the public- what are they getting out of it? A corrupt gov- well that’s what you get- protesters! #saybyetotheroyals #Justice”
Now, the heat is being turned up for the deservedly reduced royal and if he is indeed as innocent as he claims of the allegations made against him by Virginia Giuffre, he should finally do the decent thing: Answer the questions of the American authorities about his involvement in this sorry saga.
Pictured top: ‘Randy Andy’ with Jeffrey Epstein in 2010 – soon after the paedophile’s release from his first stint in prison.
Questioning Randy Andy – Prince Andrew with Virginia Giuffre at the home of Ghislaine Maxwell at 44 Kinnerton Street, Belgravia on 10th March 2001. The royal claims the photograph is a fake, whilst Giuffre has stated she is “running out of hope” that any punishment will be given for the crimes she alleges were perpetrated against her when she was a minor.Questioning Randy Andy – The American school bus that delivered a message to Buckingham Palace in February 2020.Questioning Randy Andy – The Duke of York with Donald Trump. Both associated willingly with both Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell and both need to explain their involvement with these undoubtedly deviant duo.Questioning Randy Andy – Sarah Ferguson with Ghislaine Maxwell. The former wife turned live-in sidekick of the non-sweating Prince Andrew happily accepted £15,000 from the paedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Whether it was ever repaid is unknown.
With even the ‘Observer’ turning on the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, it is time for the meddling pair to learn the art of silence
With even the Observer’s Catherine Bennett having turned on the Duke and Duchess of Sussex this morning, this ridiculous duo really now need to do one thing: Shut up.
In her column Bennett quite sensibly remarked: “[Finding Freedom is a] book that, at a stroke, exposes the embryonic visionaries to ridicule, dismays their supporters and, as demonstrated last week, delights there enemies.”
Here, indeed, is a meddling duo that have scored the biggest own goal in recent royal history and here is a couple that are now perceived to be even more ridiculous than the Duke and Duchess of Windsor. ‘MeGain’ and her drip of a husband have no sense and they employ only advisors whom pathetically pander to their ludicrous whims.
Sitting in their luxurious £11.2 million Californian mansion, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s toxic war on the media has backfired. Equally, their failure to repay the £2.4 million of public money spent on Frogmore Cottage has angered many and now, again, these supposed privacy seekers have hypocritically been making yet more video missives bleating about their pathetic plight. In doing such, they achieve only one thing: Making the public like them less and less.
Meddling MeGain – Ensconced in their Montecito mansion, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex plainly do not realise how utterly out of touch they are with the public. They would do best to avoid further publicity and jolly well learn the art of silence.
