Category: Corruption

  • Nasty Noxious Nabbing Naomi Campbell

    Nasty Noxious Nabbing Naomi Campbell

    As Naomi Campbell gets called out for pulling a ‘Catherine Meyer’ at the charity she runs, we remind her that her “rum chum” choice of friends including convicted sex offenders Ghislaine Maxwell and Harvey Weinstein do her no favours

    Naomi Campbell just cannot help herself. When she’s not nabbing blood diamonds, chucking cigarette butts or assaulting airline workers, this decidedly deranged piece of toerag, it was this morning revealed by MailOnline’s Adam Luck, spends her time pulling a ‘Catherine Meyer’ by using charity for her own benefit.

     

    Like the now Baroness Meyer – a quite hideous harridan elevated to the peerage by her fellow footwear loving chum Theresa May in spite of having been exposed by Richard Eden in The Telegraph in May 2011 for taking “all but £9,500 of the money that [the charity she ran, PACT] received in donations” as pay and in expenses – 51-year-old Campbell, it turns out, has allowed her charity, Fashion For Relief, to spend £1.68 million of the £1.89 million it raised on glitzy parties but allocated just £205,000 to actual charitable activities.

     

    Sir Christopher Meyer Prince Andrew Duke of York Catherine Meyer Baroness Meyer
    Guffawing gadabout and notorious grabber of money from anyone who’d give him a dime Prince Andrew pictured with the ghastly guffawing ex-charity tinbanger Lady Meyer and her pompous pillock husband Sir Christopher Meyer in New York on 14th October 2001.
    Catherine Meyer Lady Meyer Richard Eden Tim Walker Telegraph PACT
    Lady Meyer was exposed by ‘The Telegraph’ over a number of days in May 2011 for having received “almost 70 per cent” of the funds raised by the charity she then ran, Parents & Abducted Children Together (PACT). Though she technically broke no law, the public outrage that followed was quite understandable.
    Fashion For Relief accounts
    Streatham born model Naomi Campbell’s charity Fashion For Relief (FFR) – charity number 1159995 – seems to have adopted a very similar approach to Lady Meyer in allocating the funds it raises.
    Nasty Noxious Naomi Campbell
    In the past Adam Luck has called out the notoriously temperamental “drama queen” model out for the “rum chum” company she keeps. He remarked of her as she turned fifty: “No doubt Campbell plans to celebrate her half century in style, but she’d be wise to strike some old acquaintances from the guest list.”

    Now listed as having a “regulatory alert” on the official Charity Commission for England and Wales website, Fashion For Relief – which curiously claims to “raise funds via events and donations to help prevent poverty, sickness and distress, to advance education and training and improvements in conditions of life” yet seems to just spend money on brash bashes – Luck revealed is “currently under investigation.”

     

    An artist named Pierre Musa, who donated to Campbell’s ‘charity,’ told the paper he was “infuriated” by the shocking figures. He added:

     

    “The reality is that the FFR donations are a fraction of the money raised. Instead, the money has gone on extravagant events and ‘other expenses.’”

     

    “FFR gathers the richest, most influential personalities in the world to raise funds.  I have seen the donor lists and we are talking private wealth in the dozens of billions.”

     

    “It is difficult to see any philanthropic ambition in these numbers.”

     

    “I have now cut all ties with Naomi’s charity and I have contacted the Charities Commission to offer to help them with their investigation.”

     

    In response, a spokesman for Fashion For Relief arrogantly answered: “FFR is not solely a fundraising charity.” In doing so, they proved only one thing and that is that this so-called ‘charity’ – just like the then Lady Meyer’s before it – is nothing but an opportunity for a self-promoter to do yet more self-promotion. Shame on Naomi Campbell.

     

    Pictured top – Model Naomi Campbell with the since convicted sex offender mucky madam Ghislaine Maxwell and the now accused of being a financial fraudster Donald Trump and his now wife, the former Melania Knauss.

     

    Naomi Campbell Ghislaine Maxwell
    With the ‘socialite’ daughter of a pension pot plunderer turned now convicted sex trafficker and abuser, Ghislaine Maxwell.
    Naomi Campbell Virginia Roberts Giuffre
    With (circled) victim of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, Virginia Roberts (now known as Virginia Giuffre).
    Naomi Campbell Kevin Spacey
    With the accused of being a sex abuser actor Kevin Spacey.
    Naomi Campbell Harvey Weinstein
    With the film producer turned convicted sex offender Harvey Weinstein.
    Naomi Campbell Flavio Briatore
    With Bernie Ecclestone’s decidedly dubious accused of being all sorts of things associate Flavio Briatore.
  • Ghislaine Maxwell – Follow The Missing Money

    Ghislaine Maxwell – Follow The Missing Money

    Matthew Steeples suggests prosecutors at the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell are right to follow the money; where did the £500 million her father plundered disappear to?

    Earlier this week at the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, a JPMorgan Chase banker named Patrick McHugh testified that Jeffrey Epstein transferred at least £22.8 million ($30.7 million, €26.6 million or درهم110.4 million) to the alleged mucky madam between October 1999 and June 2007.

     

    Speaking of this potentially filthy money, at a time when it was estimated at lower sum, to Time magazine in July 2020, Jordan Waxman, managing partner of New York wealth management firm Nucleus Advisors, said: “£15.2 million ($20 million, €17.7 million or درهم73.5 million) seemed a low amount for someone using offshore accounts. It was possible that was just the tip of the iceberg.”

     

    Going further, Waxman added:

     

    “I would venture to say 20 is probably what they found so far and that the net worth would be substantially more. The other thing is Jeffrey Epstein allegedly was worth £432-or-so million ($570 million, €505 million or درهم2.1 billion). What was she doing as his No. 2 and only with $20 million?”

     

    “It could be an elaborate shell game – where the peanut’s underneath the shell and it keeps moving around and there are more and more shells.”

     

    Whilst Mr McHugh was called to the stand on Monday to describe the transactions his firm conducted between the on-off couple, what prosecutors have not yet been able to unravel – aside from the fact that Epstein likely transferred funds from other sources to Miss Maxwell also – is how the deviant actually originally met and who actually introduced them.

     

    Kirby Sommers tweet Robert Maxwell memorial lunch
    Kirby Sommers’ tweet about the Maxwell memorial evidence.
    Betty Maxwell Robert Maxwell memorial lunch
    A beaming Betty Maxwell at the event with an image of her evil conman, crook late husband behind her.

    First highlighted by crusading author of Ghislaine Maxwell: An Unauthorized Biography Kirby Sommers, ‘The Bouncing Czech’s’ dodgy daughter was pictured sitting next to evil Epstein at a memorial lunch to the pension pot plunderer on 24th November 1991. This image is telling in that the pair clearly were connected prior to Robert Maxwell’s death as if Epstein hadn’t known the tyrant tycoon, why would he a) have been there and b) why would he have been given such a prominent place on the seating plan?

     

    Going further of this image and suggesting the pair met “as early as 1988,” in September 2020, Broken: Seeking Justice podcaster Emily Saul remarked:

     

    “In addition to these accounts, there’s also a photo, snapped a mere 19 days after Robert Maxwell’s death [on the 19th November 1991], that intimately links Epstein and Ghislaine. Shot at the Plaza Hotel during a memorial event for Robert Maxwell, the picture shows Ghislaine and Epstein in conversation. Wearing a blue silk jacket, Ghislaine smiles coyly at Epstein, who is seated to her right, wearing a white bowtie and an enormous grin. It doesn’t look like a first date.”

     

     “If this is true, then the power dynamic between them shifts significantly. Perhaps she was the boss and Epstein did her bidding. Or, at the very least, they may have been equals.”

     

    “Chronologically, geographically, the idea that Robert Maxwell setup his daughter with Epstein makes sense. Epstein and Robert Maxwell both had offices at the same address, the historic Helmsley Palace Hotel in Midtown Manhattan… Robert Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein did business together.”

     

    As I have always suggested of this case, there’s a key detail that most miss the point on and that is missing money. After Robert Maxwell’s death in 1991, £500 million ($660 million, €585 million or درهم2.4 billion) vanished from his company’s pension fund and his daughter, Ghislaine, moaned about penniless and that even her knives and forks had been seized, yet within a year was living in a New York mansion and the beneficiary of at least fifteen bank accounts with balances “as high as £15.2 million ($20 million, €17.7 million or درهم73.5 million).”

     

    Interested parties should finally examine the matter of where that money actually originated and whether this charade actually centres on the matter of a Maxwell to Maxwell transaction with Epstein simply as a financial functionary. As is always the case with this story, the truth is stranger than fiction and yet again I would suggest that this evil empire was a very dirty laundry.

     

    Pictured top: Since croaked paedophile Jeffrey Epstein and since incarcerated alleged sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell at the memorial event for her father in New York in 1991.

     

    Ghislaine Maxwell and Scott Borgerson
    Whilst unsuccessfully trying to get bail for Jeffrey Epstein’s ex-lover and clear associate, Maxwell’s family and her ‘secret’ husband since 2016, Scott Borgerson, offered to pony-up £21.6 million ($28.5 million, €25.3 million or درهم104.7 million) in assets. The key question is: “How did this supposedly ‘broke’ in 1991 woman amass this vast fortune and how much else does she really have to her name?” Equally: “Where is Mr Borgerson now and why isn’t he in court to support his wife?”